RBC

Cstooby

BROS had the misfortune of not showing 10,000% returns on AI so of course RBC cuts price target even though everything including guidance was much better than expected. Fuck you RBC. Fuck your little douchbag analysts who pay to have a woman step on their worthless balls.

TJMBeav

Its free money till it isn't. And isn'ts come up often enough that brokers have compliance officers. One of my besties is a retired Senior VP at RBC with a book over $2 billion. And he wouldn't let me sell a naked put on a $2 dollar stock.

early-retirement-plz

Don’t worry there will be another opportunity for next earnings coverage by RBC and Cleveland

darkcreamale

FISV might actually be short squeezing after earnings. Vive Chairmen of Blackrock & Former CEO of RBC on board of directors now

early-retirement-plz

When the lawsuit with Anthropic reaches its conclusion this year, this fucker is going to be instantly repriced as a critical component of the AI build out. RBC and Cleveland analysts will have to go back to delivering strap ons on DoorDash once the market realizes they’re legally regarded.

Eagerbeaver98

Yes, RBC is a fraud tanking the stonk twice with lies. Their ceo is a jackass too

Eagerbeaver98

Told you guys RBC is fraud and know absolutely nothing.

MambaOut330824

Reddit got beat down before the rest of tech. It started 3 weeks ago with a bogus report from RBC capital.

MaybeaDingoAteUrBaby

The news stories of banks trying to pump the stock back up are shameful "RBC sets price target at $400" meanwhile it keeps falling

Old_and_moldy

I think the person you are replying may have been looking at information from RBC Capital markets. Their argument is the momentum is slowing down. I’d link it but you’ll have to google it as I can’t seem to do it myself. I have no idea either way, I was just curious on who was right and did a little digging.

early-retirement-plz

My thoughts are if you fail to go long before earnings is reported, you’re going to miss out on a biblical pump. This drop was initiated back at 250/share only two weeks ago from an RBC analyst cucklord named Brad Erikson who “interviewed” nameless small/medium businesses who may or may not have experienced “challenges” with ad conversion. So basically Brad reached out to John’s Dildo dropshipping who was salty his 75 dollars in ad spend didn’t attract a large customer base. Since then it’s been in an unmitigated free fall. Tomorrow the narrative changes.

Iron-Willed

I think you’re misunderstanding the point. I was only referring to the comment that when the markets go down then the dividend payout changes and goes down too. It might for many stocks like Jepq, kind of like a rate cut will effect the interest on your trading platforms HISA. But many things matter for dividend stocks, such as price per share, number of shares, how long a downturn lasts, whether you’re adding consistently to your position, when you started etc all of that will play into the calculations. All I said was that many Canadian banks have paid the same dividend even in a down turn. If you buy say RBC stock and it goes down 20% and then say it stays that way for 2-3 quarters, you will get even better returns as you’ll get that same dividend per share on a lower price and even more if you add it to your position. I have nothing against Jepq and yes I understand stock splits.

Iron-Willed

Dividends are paid out per share so if you have less shares it matters. So if you can buy more shares with the same amount of money it would be better. But yes I said unfortunately those banks only pay out quarterly so that is a downside, but it pays a consistent or increased dividend. Just look at BMO historical payout dividend and RBC’s dividend and their stock appreciation over the years. It might not be 10% but you’ll get it and if you want to drip into shares that could even be more beneficial

Iron-Willed

Canadian banks have consistently paid out without dropping but you only get quarterly payments and the price per share has increased a lot so you wouldn’t have as many shares as JEPQ but you would get possible price appreciation like RBC which has consistently gone up steadily over its lifetime. Also, not the worst case for other Canadian banks if prices dropped as you could always buy more shares during a downturn and it will eventually come back up to even as long as you stick with the 5-6 major banks. Jepq I just saw recently but their stock price won’t appreciate much and their dividends aren’t as guaranteed although I like that it’s paid out monthly and the barrier to entry is lower at this time but much higher PE ratio but I’m not sure how much that matters long term.

jimmyfah

I have a TFSA with RBC that I use for long term index and dividend growth. I could use that account. Did you do an account transfer?

m1nhuh

I used IBKR! I'm also in Canada. The only thing is you have to pay for free options data with IBKR so keep your RBC account open or ask to open a basic cash account to have access to that sweet, free options data. IBKR is cheaper for small accounts but more expensive for very large accounts. In your situation, you should come out ahead. Assignment is also free.

Nateleb1234

New price targets on meta yet the stock decided to not listen at all and go down. Can someone explain why this happened? I have copied and pasted the price targets below. Why is the stock down 3 percent on supposedly good earnings? This makes no sense. Bank of America raised its price target on Meta Platforms to $885 from $810 while maintaining a Buy rating. Barclays Capital reiterated an Overweight rating on Meta Platforms and raised its price target to $800 from $770. BMO Capital Markets raised its price target on Meta Platforms to $730 from $710 while maintaining a Market Perform rating. Canaccord Genuity raised its price target on Meta Platforms to $930 from $900 and reiterated a Buy rating. Cantor Fitzgerald reiterated an Overweight rating on Meta Platforms and increased its price target to $860 from $750. Citigroup reiterated an Outperform rating on Meta Platforms following the earnings report. DA Davidson raised its price target on Meta Platforms to $850 from $825 while maintaining a Buy rating. Deutsche Bank raised its price target on Meta Platforms to $920 from $880 and reiterated a Buy rating. Evercore ISI raised its price target on Meta Platforms to $900 from $875 and reiterated an Outperform rating. Guggenheim raised its price target on Meta Platforms to $850 from $800 while maintaining a Buy rating. Jefferies raised its price target on Meta Platforms to $1,000 from $910 and reiterated a Buy rating. JPMorgan raised its price target on Meta Platforms to $825 from $800 while maintaining an Overweight rating. Mizuho Securities raised its price target on Meta Platforms to $850 from $815 and maintained an Outperform rating. Monness Crespi & Hardt raised its price target on Meta Platforms to $890 from $808 while maintaining a Buy rating. Morgan Stanley raised its price target on Meta Platforms to $825 from $750 and reiterated an Overweight rating. Needham & Company reiterated a Hold rating on Meta Platforms following the earnings release. Piper Sandler raised its price target on Meta Platforms to $880 from $840 and reiterated an Overweight rating. Pivotal Research lowered its price target on Meta Platforms to $910 from $930 but maintained a Buy rating. Rosenblatt Securities raised its price target on Meta Platforms to $1,144 from $1,117 while reiterating a Buy rating. RBC Capital Markets reiterated an Outperform rating on Meta Platforms with a price target of $810. Sanford C. Bernstein reiterated an Outperform rating on Meta Platforms and raised its price target to $900 from $870. Scotiabank raised its price target on Meta Platforms to $700 from $685 while maintaining a Sector Perform rating. Stifel Nicolaus raised its price target on Meta Platforms to $820 from $785 and maintained a Buy rating. Truist Financial raised its price target on Meta Platforms to $900 from $875 while maintaining a Buy rating. UBS Securities reiterated a Buy rating on Meta Platforms and raised its price target to $872 from $830. Wedbush raised its price target on Meta Platforms to $900 from $880 and reiterated an Outperform rating. Wells Fargo raised its price target on Meta Platforms to $849 from $754 while keeping an Overweight rating. Wolfe Research reiterated an Outperform rating on Meta Platforms and raised its price target to $850 from $800

RedditsFullofShit

Not just earnings but leaps. It rallied pretty hard on like 1/13 which was the Tuesday after it rallied hard the prior week. Seems likely that someone was caught selling naked calls and had to deliver. Following delivery on 1/13, the RBC analyst posted his hit piece, sinking the stock before the crucial 1/16 leap date.

RedditsFullofShit

This is entirely driven by RBC. They gotta be short Reddit. It flew up to $260 and then RBC put out some hit pieces and sank it back down to $220. From there it just continues to free fall.

Stocks_N_Bondage

You generally cannot use borrowed funds to pay for the initial option premium (you pay 100% upfront). Options "risk" is the amount you paid for them (Premium), with the assumption they can go to zero, which is why the buying power effect is zero—i.e., the cash spent on an option contract is debited from your account and can't *itself* be borrowed using margin. I.e. if you have 30k in a margin account, you can buy 30k of option contracts or up to 60k of stocks, depending on the risk of the stocks—some stock's risk profile does not allow them to be bought with margined funds. Option contracts never can be. Where the margin account is useful is when trading complex spreads—and I don't think *those* risk calculations are changing. It's the intraday risk calculations for stocks that may be updating—ThinkOrSwim/Schwab already uses a Risk-Based Concentration (RBC) model to calculate maintenance requirements based on portfolio volatility, not just fixed percentages.

principaljohnny

Since you brought it up, how accurate is RBC bank on these?

Big-Guitar-1979

$50 rated by RBC bank

Newflyer3

Cleveland Research takes this down 9%, RBC guy from a week go took it down 10%. Down 15% from the high two weeks ago. I bought calls and am ready for the face ripping rally after earnings release.

Count-to-3

This is just blatantly false. No where has Reddit said they are seeing advertising revenue drop. There was an analyst that downgraded them today, that is all. The other day, it dropped from 260-220 because of another analyst downgrade RBC. Wait for earnings, silence the haters, reach new ATHs.

Sufficient-Aide6805

If showing strangers your cock for a few hours counts as research, then I’m a one man RBC.

SadOnion2110

RBC bearing

didkhdi

I hold RBC and jpm. JPM tripled and RBC doubled since I bought them during covid

Wonko-D-Sane

The only reason here is because I know what RBC is and came wondering "Who da faq listens to Canadian bankers for investment advice on US companies" I know that the Canadian Pension Plan (Canadian federal version of US Social security), has about half 3x more its assets invested in the US than in Canada at (\~47% vs \~12% of assets) so I get why maple syrup sipping "folks eh" pay attention, but taking financial analyst advice from a bank they are forced to use due to government mandated sector cartel oligarchies is cute.

throwaway9gk0k4k569

My log says this was announced in October: 2025-10-27T21:17:01-07:00 "HON - RBC upgrades to outperform from Sector Perform, raises PT to 253 from 235. We are upgrading Honeywell from Sector Perform to Outperform following a solid 3Q25 that, in our view, marks the start of the breakup catalyst-rich phase heading into the planned 2H26 separation of Aerospace and Automation. We see growing momentum across core segments, improved visibility on execution, and a credible roadmap toward value unlock. Our sum-of-the-parts valuation implies attractive upside. With management executing well, separation milestones approaching, and ‘deal purgatory’ perceptions fading, we believe investor focus will shift to the structural upside embedded in two strong standalone franchises positioned for sustainable growth and margin expansion.""

Eagerbeaver98

Check how often RBC has lied about reddit and gotten owned by the earnings call. Rbc is one of canadas most fraudulent banks as well, the ceo pat is another jack ass

Eagerbeaver98

RBC knows absolutely nothing about reddit they've said this before and got shown up by reddit earnings call. The ceo of RBC is a crook named pat

Betteroffbroke

Slam piece. RBC Analyst got mixed reviews after calling a few businesses and asking about their ROI. Reddit has the data and has been working with businesses to create more transparency and new tools. This is nothing more than a tech company growing and an analyst pushing the stock down because they have interest. I’d rather ground my investing with data to make an informed decision, no hear-say from a banker.

TWSTrader

**Institutional background here (14 years).** The most damning line in that RBC note isn't the "mixed feedback"—it's the admission about **Organic vs. Paid ROI.** *"ROI for organically building a presence — by a person — viewed as higher than ad spend."* That is a nightmare sentence for an Ad-supported platform. * **Meta/Google:** You *cannot* replicate their ad reach with organic posting anymore. You have to pay the toll. * **Reddit:** If a company can hire a savvy intern for $60k/year to "shitpost" organically and get *better* conversion than spending $60k on Reddit Ads, then Reddit's "Moat" is leaking. The Bull case relies on Reddit forcing brands to pay. If the "Free" route is still more effective, their ad-pricing power is going to hit a ceiling very quickly.

Educational-Test9223

I’ve tried a few platforms and moomoo has been my go-to lately. The UI is clean, the charts/research tools are solid, and it’s easy to track everything in one place. If RBC is working for you there’s no rush to switch, but moomoo is definitely worth checking out if you want a smoother app experience and more built-in market info.

InternationalAge5880

RBC downgrade never fails to tank a stock

DragonfruitFar7568

bro this is actually kinda sus ngl. RBC downgrades RDDT and hood gets dragged same week? feels coordinated. rothchilds been linked to canadian banks forever and royal bank’s logo is literally a lion clutching the world lol. maybe they’re just suppressing midcaps to scoop em cheap before earnings pump. or maybe i’m just regarded again. either way i’m sitting on my hands till feb 5th

FFL_Insights

It really depends on what you plan to do over the next few years, not just what works today. RBC Direct Investing is totally fine if you’re mostly buy-and-hold, value simplicity, and like everything under one bank. Where people start to regret it later is usually fees and flexibility, not reliability. A lot of folks switch once they start caring about: lower commissions easier ETF/stock purchases better UI and reporting access to US markets without extra friction Platforms like Questrade or Interactive Brokers tend to appeal more as portfolios grow or strategies evolve, while Wealthsimple is popular for its simplicity if you’re mostly passive. If RBC works for you now, there’s no rush, just be intentional. The “regret” usually comes from staying on a platform after your needs change, not from starting on a conservative one. Curious what your long-term plan is (mostly passive vs more active)? That usually determines the best fit more than the platform itself.

RedditsFullofShit

It’s almost like- they (RBC) *need* it to go down

RedditsFullofShit

I mean isn’t it clear RBC is short? Reddit hit 263 last Friday, then tanked to 236 on no news. An 8% swing intraday. On no news. Option Friday right. Then wouldn’t you know it, delivery day Tuesday Reddit went nuts again and went up 8% back to 260…..on no news! A few upgrades but no news. And then RBC immediately after the upgrades hit, launches their hit piece to sink it back down. It’s clear RBC doesn’t want it above $250

iPhoneOver9000

I bank there as well so it’s easy to transfer funds from my RBC bank account and vice versa instantly. The rates aren’t too bad if you can qualify lower

MasterpieceOk8986

Suspicious Logic in RBC's Reddit Report: Why would an analyst focused on 'SMB ad checks' suddenly mention the Google Al contract renewal date? It's easy to miss, but in the middle of an ad platform analysis, he suddenly drops a prediction about the Al training scraping contract- something completely unrelated to the topic. This is a blatant hit piece designed to tank the stock right before a big move. Think about it

botperception

RBC - thrash company and analysts.

Trader0721

RBC analyst…that’s like a tier 4 bank…next!

PatientAd9394

RBC who?

Far-Maximum-5097

Why would you use RBC for this, they have terrible rates

Opposite_Engine_6776

RBC Capital stroked our cocks today.

lexi_con

Whoever replaces Jerome Powell as chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve in May knows one thing: If they don’t do what President Donald Trump wants, they risk being criminally prosecuted. That was the unambiguous message in Powell’s extraordinary statement yesterday, in which he vowed to continue to set monetary policy independently despite the federal grand jury subpoenas investigating his statements to Congress about alleged cost overruns in the renovation of the Fed’s headquarters. “This new threat is not about my testimony last June or about the renovation of the Federal Reserve buildings. … Those are pretexts. The threat of criminal charges is a consequence of the Federal Reserve setting interest rates based on our best assessment of what will serve the public, rather than following the preferences of the President,” he said. “This is about whether the Fed will be able to continue to set interest rates based on evidence and economic conditions—or whether instead monetary policy will be directed by political pressure or intimidation.” Markets moved back into “Sell America” mode overnight as traders digested the prospect of an incoming Fed chair who lacks independent credibility: The dollar sank 0.32% against a basket of international currencies; the yield on 5-year Treasuries moved sharply up, a sign that investors now regard U.S. government bonds as being suddenly more risky; gold futures—the traditional safe haven—rose 2.21% today to hit a new record high over $4,600 per troy ounce; and S&P 500 futures are down 0.66% this morning prior to the opening bell. Wall Street analysts are almost universally negative about the news. “The combined drop in the dollar, equities and Treasuries was a reminiscence of the ‘sell America’ days of last spring,” ING’s Francesco Pesole told clients this morning. “The downside risks for the dollar from any indications of further determination to interfere with the Fed’s independence are substantial. Again, the bond market will be the most important barometer, both on the short end of the curve if markets price back in more rate cuts, or in the long end with potential stress signs on independence risks. A sharp steepening of the curve could take the dollar on a fall.” At Invesco Asset Management, analyst David Chao told Bloomberg, “The Fed subpoena is another example of how U.S. assets are becoming less attractive … Not only is the U.S. retrenching behind its Fortress America borders, the country is also becoming more predatory.” The subpoenas may also trigger a burst of inflation, according to RBC Capital Markets’ Blake Gwinn. “Markets will start to price in greater inflation expectations, inflation risk premium, and term premium if the Fed’s independence comes under further attack,” he told the Financial Times. “We don’t appear to have hit it yet, but every action is another step closer to it.” Counterintuitively, some analysts think that the investigation now makes near-term interest rate cuts less likely, because Powell and the other members of the Federal Open Markets Committee (FOMC) will be determined to show the markets that they are guided by the data and not legal threats. “The move may also help Fed independence,” UBS’s Paul Donovan said in an email. “Powell’s defiance might signal a reluctance to quit as a Fed governor this year. There are signs the Senate may delay confirming the nomination of a new Fed Chair. Concerns about market reactions and perceptions of institutional independence (in the wake of legal challenges) may become hawkish considerations in setting interest rates.” ING’s Pesole said, “Markets aren’t ready to price in a loss of Fed independence just yet, either on the view that Powell will indeed remain firm in his policy views (as he’s pledged to), the FOMC won’t be heavily affected, or that the DOJ subpoenas aren’t likely to lead to an indictment.” Either way, there’s a real sense of uncertainty among asset managers right now. “The Fed as we have understood it as an institution over the past couple of decades is fading from view. It’s operating in a different environment,” ANZ’s chief economist, Richard Yetsenga, told the FT.

longGERN

Sold RBC for 75% gain in about a couple years

youlikeblockingsodoi

I can’t believe RBC bought shares of this shit following national bank. They’re supposed to be the biggest banks in Canada.

Racer049

$RBC Did some work with the company had no idea they had stock or were a public company. Had I bought stock the minute I met them it would be up over 30% . They make a lot of products but have a lot of contacts for military items and constant flow of them because most bearings are replaced at time intervals so steady cash flow .

Big_Function_N1

I have a ETF of Canadian banks, but TD and RBC (RY) would likely be good, but I like a bit less risk. And I have JP Morgan which has been solid, so I'll likely put more into those

oswell_pepper

> DeVocht claims that RBC mistakenly treated him like a sophisticated investor when he was anything but.

exlawyerstocktrader

“In August 2020, DeVocht contacted RBC Private Banking about obtaining a loan against the equity in his self-directed RBC trading account — then valued at $50 million — so he could move out of his rental apartment and buy a place.” Dude could have withdrawn 1% of his portfolio and had a massive down payment, but wanted full leverage.

sljxuoxada

The "big 5" banks in Canada (RBC, TD, BMO, Scotia, CIBC) are, by law, not allowed to fail. Canadian taxpayers will be forced to bail them out if there is ever a chance they might fail. Very safe investment.

PaperHandsTheDip

Sure because 10-15 years ago we were just recovering from the financial / banking crisis. All the banks were incredibly beat down. If you go back even further (ie: 30 years) the banks have outperformed the SPY quite drastically. RBC for example (Canada's biggest bank) has returned \~3420% since 1995 EXCLUDING dividends. The SPY has returned \~1400% during the same time.

PaperHandsTheDip

They're among the safest in the world due to regulations in Canada. Here's a comparison to the S&P 500. SPY: \~86% CIBC: 131% RBC: 122% BMO: 84% TD: 78% Scotia: 46% They don't look too out of line anywhere to me. Some underperformed the S&P500, some overperformed, they are more or less inline with what I'd expect

Senior_Pension3112

I check my RBC DI daily and it's about 2/3 of my total. I write it on scrap of paper and keep track of new highs in the total

Vibration548

The so-called "all in one" ETFs like the ones I mentioned are actively rebalanced to keep the correct stock & bond ratio. If you buy a stock-only index ETF then generally those just follow the index and are not actively managed. The ETFs I mentioned are available on RBC Direct Investing. https://www.rbcdirectinvesting.com/accounts-investments/etfs/commission-free-etfs.html

Johnkiiii

Thank you so much......Just a few question. Are there EFTs actively managed to rebalance or just follow the index no matter what? Another question, what is the difference between stock, bonds and mutual funds as there are some overlaps between sectors and companies? Finally, does RBC offer such an EFT? Thanks,

TortyPapa

All physical. I am in Canada. Buy through RBC Precious Metals and Bullion program via Wealth Management advisor. Monthly storage fee.

PaperHandsTheDip

But why? I have bags of RBC and TD bank, they're doing fine.

mouse1222

Yes like RBC bank

GrungeEraDixon

RBC had very reasonable margin loan rates

2020Macthedog

For a tactical option I sell at a 50% gain. If it is a gamble I dump it around a 20%ish gain. Try like hell to cut losses quick. Especially in an expensive and volatile market like our current market. For shares I buy without trying to time and only sell when I need cash for a big purchase or if I go to the mattresses. FWIW, I went to the mattresses around March when I took control of my port from a buddy (who is retiring from RBC). Sold all my positions and parked in $SGOV

Charming_Catch1982

Palantir was just mentioned in the BLOWOUT 03 Nvidia FY26 Earnings "Our new partner Palantir, is super charging the incredibly popular Ontology platform with Nvidia's CUDA-X libraries and Al models for the first time. Previously, like most enterprise software platforms Ontology runs only on CPU's. Lowe's is leveraging the platform to supply supply chain agility reducing costs and improving customer satisfaction. Enterprises broadly are using Al to boot productivity, increase efficiency and reduce costs. RBC Royal Bank of Canada] is using Agentic Al to drive significant analyst productivity to slashing report generation time from hours to minutes. Al and diaital twins are helping Unilever to accelerate content creation by 2x and cut costs by 50 percent." ⁃ Colette Kress, executive vice president and chief financial officer of NVIDIA For context The Royal Bank of Canada is a Canadian multinational financial services company and the largest bank in Canada by market capitalization and the most valueable company in Canada Folks we are earlvy in the Al build out. Palantir doesn't even need a "sales force " lol. Their product sells itself as Dr. Karp has been preaching for the last 5 vears

Character_Adorable

My neighbour probably has no sympathy for you. A resident of Sooke, B.C., on Vancouver Island, **Christopher DeVocht**, has filed a lawsuit against **RBC Dominion Securities** and the accounting firm **Grant Thornton LLP** after he lost his entire investment portfolio, which had peaked at a value of **$415 million**. He claims he received inadequate advice that led to the losses.  Details of the Lawsuit * **The initial investment:** DeVocht, a carpenter, started with an initial investment of approximately $88,000, which grew to a net worth of $415 million by November 2021, primarily through trading Tesla stock and options. * **The claim:** In his lawsuit, filed in the Supreme Court of British Columbia in Vancouver, DeVocht alleges that RBC and Grant Thornton were negligent and breached their contracts by failing to provide adequate risk mitigation strategies and advice. * **Alleged inadequate advice:** The claim states that the advisors failed to understand his evolving goal of moving his wealth into secure, passive investments to retire early. Instead, they advised him to incorporate a company for tax planning purposes and continue an "extreme concentration in Tesla" using a margin account, which allowed him to borrow money to trade. * **The loss:** When Tesla's stock price declined sharply in 2022, DeVocht's investment holding company was forced to sell shares to repay loans from his margin account, eventually wiping out his entire portfolio.

dedalolab

Wtf is RBC? Robincooked?

larrylegend1990

This is RBC which is a scam. $10 fee per trade

Little-Butterfly-441

I do trading on both TD and RBC. Although I love TD, I do have to say that RBC fills orders at lower price than limit set all the time which is great. TD fills order at exactly the limit price

flynnpark3r

Doing this on RBC Direct Investing is insane

flynnpark3r

I know the RBC app when I see it 💔💔🥀🥀

MorganShokuie

The commission of buying and selling this position in RBC would be a good chunk of his loss

Few_Ad_4453

That’s RBC??

Alternative-Leave530

Just don’t use RBC. It sucks

dp873

Bruh doing this on RBC... Are you an old timer?

CanaryUmbrella

Imagine issuing a Buy rating for a company with 300X multiple, stagnant earnings, and a CEO pay package that is 1/26th of the U.S. National Debt. Yet Deutsche Bank, Morgan Stanley, and RBC can - somehow - imagine this.

Crazy-Cook2035

He sued the bank But he’ll lose, his private banker and broker showed he was operating two separate accounts leveraging each other against He was a gambling junky He reached $26 million when he got his own personal RBC banker The call options he was asking for couldn’t be done on your run if the mill platforms He then took out a $35 million loan from his own c-corp at the slightest drop is Tesla’s share price which is degenerate level behavior

meme_investor_69

This is why I let RBC do my trading for me, it goes up and down but I’m up for the year. Worth the fee for someone like me who doesn’t know crap about stocks

Complex-Jello-2031

# Boutique M&A Specialists (VERY GOOD): **15. Leerink Partners** ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (5/5) * **🔥 BIOTECH M&A SPECIALIST** * **When Leerink covers a stock, M&A is likely** * Example: Banking ACRS (you own it!) * **If Leerink is involved, M&A probability HIGH** * **CRITICAL FOR BIOTECH PLAYS** **16. Jefferies** ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (5/5) * **🔥 M&A ADVISORY LEADER** * Example: Shopping CTOR (you own it!) * **If Jefferies is advisor, deal is likely** * **CRITICAL FOR M&A PLAYS** **17. Cantor Fitzgerald** ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (4/5) * Biotech M&A specialist * **Credible** * Example: CABA $30 target **18. Piper Sandler** ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (4/5) * Healthcare M&A specialist * **Credible** **19. RBC Capital** ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (4/5) * Canadian M&A specialist * **Trustworthy** **20. BTIG** ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (4/5) * Decent firm * **Credible**

Happy_Discussion_536

You have no idea what you're talking about. Nah so many out there still. For WSB look at wasifaiboply, pmotiveforce, duehousing, cryptohorn, The_Brand94, Aggressive_Bit_91, Violent_mud_butt, Same-Brilliant2014 Then there is the Big bank bears: |Bank|S&P 500 Price Target| :--|--:| |Citigroup|6,600| |Goldman Sachs|6,600| |Morgan Stanley|6,500| |JPMorgan|6,500| |Barclays|6,450| |Société Générale|6,400| |RBC Capital Markets|6,250| |UBS|6,100| |Stifel|5,500| Look at the $7T+ in cash sitting in MMFs.

Cold_Designer2171

Great question (and fair) -They are in a few ways. Firstly, they overlap as comparable investments in the eyes of analysts, institutional investors, and valuation models due to shared exposure to high-growth, software-driven and security-critical technology ecosystems: 1) All three are software/IP-heavy with recurring revenue streams (royalties, subscriptions, licensing). 2) They all possess the same thematic exposure: CS, IoT, AI Detection, Recurring Revenue Models 3) Hedge funds & analysts (Barclays, RBC, Morningstar) group them in the same "Secure Connected Infrastructure" / "Edge Intelligence" baskets AND they overlap in holdings: I hope that helped, love these types of questions - keep em coming fam!

ettenmoar

RBC upgraded from $106 to $116 and it's completely hidden from the interwebs

Happy_Discussion_536

Nah so many out there still. For WSB look at wasifaiboply, pmotiveforce, duehousing, cryptohorn, The_Brand94, Aggressive_Bit_91, Violent_mud_butt, Same-Brilliant2014 Then there is the Big bank bears: |Bank|S&P 500 Price Target| :--|--:| |Citigroup|6,600| |Goldman Sachs|6,600| |Morgan Stanley|6,500| |JPMorgan|6,500| |Barclays|6,450| |Société Générale|6,400| |RBC Capital Markets|6,250| |UBS|6,100| |Stifel|5,500| Look at the $7T+ in cash sitting in MMFs.

PaperHandsTheDip

Yes - macro correlations are a very real thing. My "defensive" plays right now are Canadian banks (TD, RBC), BRK (love brk), and GAP of all things. I'll hold those thru as big of a drawdown as I need - they'll be fine. Never sell significant stakes in those. Generally what I do once a bear market starts (or we get drawdowns) is just rotate my capital into BRK (or something similar) and... wait. Do literally nothing. Never go to cash (I don't like sitting out incase it bulls back). Most cash gang misses buying back in and get fucked. By staying in the market - that doesn't happen. Once a bull starts again I'll rotate the defensive things into high risk again. At the moment my portfolio is\* quite defensive, but I'm still playing catalysts with calls

OrdinaryMix4013

Tesla Has Manufacturing Scale, Vertical Integration to Bring Humanoids to Market, RBC Says jsus fuck these analyst are straight up garbage

Frequent_Optimist

Cantor Fitzgerald with the 510 raised guidance. RBC with the maintain on 500. TSLA can't fail.

PaperHandsTheDip

Pretty much. Volatility hurts - but like - I'm printing this year (6 months). Significantly more than anything else I've seen. My degen portfolio is up over 200% since the bottom. Just take that and sit it out in brk is generally a good play. It's what I usually do (also RBC, TD bank, etc). It's generally not a bad idea / play. You don't miss any runs (they do well) and you never miss buying back in. They're generally much safer in down markets too

PaperHandsTheDip

I never hold cash - I just rotate into safe shit. RBC, TD bank & BRK are my favorite. Then I never miss buying back in. If we start going up / markets turn bullish again I'll monkey back into high risk shit. \--- I trimmed a fuckton of OTM calls today across the board. Took losses on many, didn't matter. Risks too high rn. Locking in a lot of the profits I made over the last 6 months on the bull run. 7 figures is too much to lose / risk because 'I wanted to yolo'

PaperHandsTheDip

Not a bad idea to mitigate risks. I just really don't like puts personally... Prefer holding 'boring stable shit' instead (that does tend to do well). One of my favorites is RBC. \--- My folio got rekt today - lost like 500k. I'm overlevered. I'm up quite massively on this last 6month bull run (7 figures profit from degening) and figure it's a good idea to lock in all gains and just walk away until the next one. \--- I think I've already made up my mind tbh.

westernwasteland

I have moo moo and RBC but a lot of noobs use weathsimple

IncidentSome4403

RBC DI, just its usual good old fashioned glitches and crashes

Competitive_One_8953

No shares available to buy in WS or RBC

PaperHandsTheDip

RBC and TD bank are ones i like for that

Happy_Discussion_536

Banks don't need to say anything, people will buy anyway. But what they are trying to do is get people to sell. Many of them are very bearish. You should be buying. |Bank|S&P 500 Price Target| :--|--:| |Citigroup|6,600| |Goldman Sachs|6,600| |Morgan Stanley|6,500| |JPMorgan|6,500| |Barclays|6,450| |Société Générale|6,400| |RBC Capital Markets|6,250| |UBS|6,100| |Stifel|5,500|

Djcatoose

RBC has an American arm for wealth management. They offered me the cheapest ABL, so I went there. My personal banking is somewhere else

Djcatoose

I live in NY. I use RBC for... reasons. But I've lived in Buffalo NY for 37 out of 39 years.

Wonko-D-Sane

RBC... Canadian.... must be liberal to the point where you accept that the budget will balance itself so much that you don't even need a budget. Some places I know shut down operations until funding is approved, but not those guys

SpringTucky101

What in the hell is RBC?

Happy_Discussion_536

Nah look at wasifaiboply, pmotiveforce, duehousing, cryptohorn, The_Brand94, Aggressive_Bit_91, Violent_mud_butt, Same-Brilliant2014 Then there is the Big bank bears: |Bank|S&P 500 Price Target| :--|--:| |Citigroup|6,600| |Goldman Sachs|6,600| |Morgan Stanley|6,500| |JPMorgan|6,500| |Barclays|6,450| |Société Générale|6,400| |RBC Capital Markets|6,250| |UBS|6,100| |Stifel|5,500|

rubber2020

Fuck yeah congrats ($RBC)