RSP
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight ETF
Mentions (24Hr)
-80.00% Today
Reddit Posts
Anyone following Brenmiller $BNRG?
Easiest way to track SP500 Equal Weight w\Dividends re-invested?
[News] A January "rout" in megacap tech stocks this month is now the Wall Street consensus, according to the BofA equity team.
[NEWS] A January "rout" in megacap tech stocks this month is now the Wall Street consensus, according to the BofA equity team.
WHY jobs +339K yet unemployment increased to 3.7% + Fed + Market
Hey, I’m 69 and looking into asset allocation for my long term buy and hold portfolio.
Need ideas about securing a Retirement Savings Plan (RSP) against Stock Crash.
Ideas about securing a Retirement Savings Plan (RSP) against Crash.
This market strategist says stocks could gain 8% to 15% from here — giving anxious investors a perfect opportunity to sell
Canadian investing question regarding limits within the registered account (RSP)
Market Perspective: Recent Trends & Thoughts for the End of Year
Market Perspective: Recent Trends & Thoughts for the End of Year
Calculating return on stocks (what am I doing wrong?)
I don't understand the annual rate of return calculations for stocks
Market Perspective: Recent Trends and Performance in Charts
19 year old long term investor , RSP or VTI ?
Seeking advice on getting started in ETFs in a Covid market
$SWBK - Bird Plans to Go Public via SPAC at $2.3 Billion Valuation
Do rebalancing ETFs generally realize capital gains for shareholders?
The 100 Year Portfolio: A Look at Using the Dragon Portfolio as a Retail Investor
Mentions
JEPI, VDC, PFIX and some RSP might do the trick I guess?
Throw in some XMHQ with that RSP. XMHQ +6.11% YTD
Moving forward I have been slowly allocating my fund towards RSP. Currently it's 10% of my etf right now.
RSP/Equal Weight S&P: +5.15% YTD SPY +0.9% YTD
RSP.... SCHD... QQM... All good, schd finally jumped, rsp holding steady, qqqm down a bit
RSP doing well so far! Very interesting
I knew it. I stopped buying at $510 and started buying beat down Google instead. Then when Google ran up I started buying RSP.
Consumer staples. Look at an equal weigh S&P like RSP vs SPY. It crushes. People are rotating into McDonald’s, Coca Cola, hormel, etc
You see, in the much longer term, I may not even disagree, but I will just be stunned if there isn’t even a minor wriggle by RSP on tech getting killed. Best case scenario is that this is 2021 but I have some doubts as if a move below this range occurs, it may be big.
Rotations. $RSP is up today. RSP is if all 500 companies in the S&P were weighted equally. It shows people are rotating out of tech and into defensive stocks
Even RSP was up like .8%
$RSP was up all day, from the open.
Agree, RSP is green so it's tech sector that drives the price action today, GOOGL's earning will make or break SPY tomorrow
$RSP is up bigly on the day. You're just a bad stockpicker.
RSP making new highs while SPY falls. Get used to it
RSP is up 4% on the year retard
RSP is 4% on the year already, it's a big rotation, and you aren't in it
RSP KO and CVX. Best offense is a good defense
The real bubble is RSP and IWM.
RSP is green... large cap tech is eating it, hope my msft recovers 😬 how do I apply for welfare?
I think RSP is rebalanced quarterly but yes transaction cost is higher. Expense ratio for RSP is 20bps while VOO has an expense ratio of around 3bps. Just looking at historical returns, it performed better during market downturns by a couple of %. However the last 3 years its lagged behind by around 10% annually which combined with that much higher expense ratio leads to a lower return. Just better to buy the index etf and hold over a decade or so to get the weighted avg return
>constant buying and selling Nope. For example RSP, the most prominent S&P500 equal weight ETF is rebalanced quarterly.
Rally is broad (RSP, SPY QQQ IWM), VIX is dying. Looks good to me unless PLTR rugs!
Am I stupid for thinking of doing this? So I’m sure we all know that a lot of etfs are heavy into the big 7 and well the crazy growth that can’t be sustained has me thinking of moving away. I’d rather play it safer for long term growth and spread out to etfs like XLI, XLF, XLE, XLV, VBR, VXUS, and RSP. My goal is long term growth for retirement. Thoughts on this? I’d rather not get fucked when this shit bursts by keeping most of my money in VT or something.
Equal weighted SPY (RSP) went green lmfao
I'm sorry to say it, but yes, the Nasdaq is strong enough to pull everything down with it on its own if it's getting blitzed as badly as 9-11 AM. If you actually look at the sector watch page, it's half green, half red, and RSP is flat. This is a tech led selloff maybe made worse by margin blowouts in other stuff.
RSP is holding where it is because MSFT is getting ripped to shreds. Options selling and dispersion trade leads to correlations between big tech and RSP being very low
Disagree. If MSFT wasn't getting ripped to shreds, RSP would probably be up modestly. Long story short here is YES, the Nasdaq is strong enough to push and shove everything around without help.
I’m mid 50s, so a bit different stage of my investing life, and have been concerned about the heavy tech concentration in the typical S&P 500 and even Total Stock Market Index funds. Part of my strategy to reduce that concentration is to buy some RSP - equal weighted S&P 500.
It's worth paying attention to options on products with high daily trading volume, as their bid-ask spreads and execution rates tend to be much better. While I also think RSP is decent, it's worth quickly learning about others to make trading easier.
Just guessing here so take it with a grain of salt - this could be a dumb idea- but I like these puzzles: A synthetic RSP could be going long SPY short the top weighted stocks. So Write options against SPY but go long against the top weighted +dozen stocks. You should have liquidity but sizing will be the main issue and such a strat may be more suited to an institutional account.
Since RSP is the dominant/most-popular equal-weight SP500 fund, looking for something similar with better liquidity will just lead to frustration.
RSP is about it. Just gotta deal with the occasional shitty fill or set the limit and hope it gets filled.
For most of last year, investors were warned that hiding out in Big Tech was becoming a dangerous move. Turned out that wasn’t great advice.Up until November, the Magnificent Seven technology giants, including Nvidia Corp, Microsoft Corp. and Amazon.com Inc., accounted for most of the market’s double-digit advance. Since then, though? It’s been a different story.The long-forecast rotation from tech is set to enter its fourth month, and few on Wall Street expect it to end. A version of the S&P 500 Index stripped of market-cap bias has jumped 6% since early November while the standard version has added just 1.6%. Materials, health care and consumer sectors have supplanted tech at the forefront. Small caps in the Russell 2000 Index have soared more than 7%. The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight exchange-traded fund (RSP) has taken in $4.8 billion this year through Friday, the third-most among about 1,500 US equity-focused ETFs. Rotation Gathers Pace Optimism that the American economy is set to take off has fueled the rotation, with companies whose fortunes are closely tied to the business cycle attracting investor cash. At the same time, artificial intelligence investing has become less monolithic in the tech sector, with investors starting to choose winners and losers.“Street expectations for the next few years suggest that whether due to fiscal policy changes, monetary policy changes, the long-awaited industrial cycle or a mixture of all three, growth is set to broaden out considerably,” said Andrew Greenebaum, senior vice president of equity research product management at Jefferies LLC.The optimism is not without risks. The labor market remains cool, geopolitical tensions have heightened and domestic unrest may lead to another government shutdown. And, of course, calls for tech’s demise have failed to materialize for years now.Still, there are signs of measurable improvement in market breadth and earnings growth expanding into erstwhile laggards. Big Tech profit gains that have long outstripped the rest of the S&P 500 are set to narrow at the same time investors are becoming more concerned about massive tech capital outlays.“Tech sector and Magnificent Seven leadership have stalled since the end of October, with investors embracing the call for broadening earnings growth,” Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer at Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, said in a Jan. 26 note to clients. “Consider preparing for new equity index leadership.”Greenebaum points to three areas in the market when conveying the “realness” of the rotation to clients. The first is the Russell 2000’s outperformance compared to large caps at the same time cyclicals in the S&P 500 have taken up the mantle from tech. Investment flows into small caps have “improved considerably” over the last several months, he said. Finally, he expects small caps to deliver a bigger rate of earnings growth.The latter point can be seen in expectations for profit growth for US indexes for 2025, 2026, and 20207. The Russell 2000 is expected to slightly edge the S&P 500 for the 2025 full year, with projected earnings per share for the period at 13.5%, compared with 12.8% for the more popular large-cap benchmark, based on Bloomberg consensus estimates.There remain doubters — and that’s an opportunity, according to Trivariate Research LLC founder Adam Parker, former chief US equity strategist at Morgan Stanley. His team found, using AI apps to parse Wall Street forecasts, that the consensus heading into 2026 was to overweight tech and financials. They’ve been dead last.At the same time, none of the shops he canvassed advised jumping into energy or materials. Neither have clients of his who manage portfolios inquired about the resources producers. His firm is taking that as a contrarian signal.The past week also saw a surge in inflows to cyclical stocks, according to Deutsche Bank AG data compiled by strategist Parag Thatte. Investors poured a record $6.5 billion into materials, $3 billion into industrials, $2.9 billion into financials and $1.7 billion into energy. In contrast, tech funds logged $1.4 billion in outflows, their sixth in the last eight weeks.Thatte notes that previous surges in cyclical positioning and flows like after the 2024 elections have petered out. The latest began in mid-November after signs of a broadening in earnings growth.“A continued broadening, which is our forecast, is key for the rotation to sustain,” Thatte said. Alexandra Semenova is a reporter for Bloomberg News covering US stocks and investment strategy. She is also a regular contributor on Bloomberg Television and Bloomberg Radio.
XLF, and RSP red this pump on spy can only last so long
My equal weight sp500 (RSP), mid cap (IVOO), and small cap (VIOO) ETFs have finally started taking off in the last month. I feel like this rebalancing is overdue given the run VOO has had.
If you’re worried about spy being overweighted tech, you could do RSP which is equal weight SP500. I’d also throw in some XLF (SPDR Financials ETFs) XLE (spdr energy)
The us market has been rotating since September's rate cut. That doesn't mean dump us stocks in general, it means be cautious with mag7. Problem is the international markets have already taken their big gains (Korea?!). So international has its own risks and US is worth considering because of perennial strength of US consumer. Setting metals and financials aside, look at the sectors that have taken off: biotech, healthcare, oil services, even agribusiness. And we know it's late cycle because just in the last few weeks we see Consumer Staples. RSP and IWM are at all time highs but I imagine they will also be the first to decline before any big crash. (Bias, I hold CL, PG, MDLZ)
RSP is about as close as you're gonna get. You still own the entire S&P 500 economy, but the Magnificent 7, (mostly heavily engaged with AI for the most part), combined make up only ~1.4% of the fund instead of ~30%
>What do you mean training for RSP? I mean that I use swipe style typing and don't proof read to catch mistakes. Reasoning, not training
What do you mean training for RSP? Didn’t realize the overlap was that significant. I’ll look into that going forward.
What's your training for the RSP? On including QQQ(M): Remember this has heavy overlap (over 80% by count) with the S&P 500 (looking at total market instead may increase that a little more). Look only at the inclusion criteria, not past returns (as they’re a terrible way to judge future returns, at least in the way most people tend to believe). Do they make sense to you? Does it make sense to over weight these stocks based on the inclusion criteria of the fund? They don’t to me, I view it as complete nonsense. For US to international: * https://investor.vanguard.com/mutual-funds/profile/portfolio/vtwax - Global market cap weights (be sure to switch from “Regions” to “Markets”). This can be a great default position. * https://investor.vanguard.com/investing/investment/international-investing - Vanguard 40% of stock is recommended to be international. * 2022 Survey of target date funds: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bogleheads/comments/rffoe7/domestic_vs_international_percentage_within/
K style economy with short date Tbill injection leads me to think IWM and RSP will see more growth for short-medium term than SPY/QQQ... my ongoing thesis
Equal weight index is a good option to get more exposure to the smaller of the large caps in S&P 500. Look up RSP.
you talking about RSP? cuz SPY more like "top 7 companies in the USA"
You have RSP and the other 493 stocks to thank for that!
If there’s anything US retail investors don’t like, it’s having to think about something other than VOO. They don’t care about unreasonable valuations or concentration risk. They don’t even like the idea of an equal-weight ETF like RSP because they’re so convinced that Big Tech stocks will continue to outperform everything forever.
I'd vote RSP right now. There is a lot of broadening out and defensive rotation. It's hard to say if the mag7 will continue to perform, which is heavily weighted in the VOO.
I think RSP will overtake VOO this year.
1) the rally has been narrow because it IS narrow. Look up dispersion trading. Mag 7 has carried the index for quite some time now. This is not new news. If anything the dispersion trade is finally falling apart. RSP (equal weight) up with SPX down. 2) guidance is still strong. Everyone’s holding their breath for the cards to come crashing down. Earnings are still strong. Guidance is still strong. 3) low volatility begets low volatility. It’s self reinforcing. And when macro risks are hedged and the hedging doesn’t pay out, that Vega crush pushes markets up. Learn your Greeks!
I understand what you are asking. but i'm a little bit confused on your questions/thoughts about executing on that view. Basically you feel like you have to much exposure to the Mags or even Tech / AI in general through the S&P 500. Not surprised as I know many feel that way from an absolute perspective. There's a couple of ways you can reduce that exposure. You can do different asset classes like non-US or different US market caps like small caps. another way to reduce that exposure but keep buying the S&P 500 names is via equal weight ETF like RSP which still gets you Mags but less weight. Other ways to achieve that is since S&P 500 is heavier on the growth side you can add more to a value tilt ETF too. I'm not aware of any rule based thing in the Roth that can do that. but since you are thinking wholistically i would recommend using a good old spreadsheet to help analyze your portfolio for you so you can get a sense of weighting. Even if you data dump into a spreadsheet then load it into GPT or Gemini can show you your weights pretty quickly and easily so you can make that decision on how to reallocate or allocate new funds to certain funds you prefer. Hopefully i understood what you were trying to get at.
I hear you there and do have some RSP, really what I'd love is VOO just with a few taken out or a max weight of 5%
I mean if you think VOO is over invested in Mag7, then you are looking for RSP. If RSP isn't what you want, then you are basically saying that you think you can pick stocks better and to that I say good luck.
I just did this. Sold SPY and bought RSP just to dial back tech exposure. If I want more tech, I’ll just buy individual stocks.
One of the largest equal-weight ETFs, RSP, [hasn't had a capital gains distribution in at least the past 5 years](https://www.invesco.com/us/en/financial-products/etfs/invesco-sp-500-equal-weight-etf.html#Distributions-%26-Yields). Most properly-managed ETFs with decent trading activity should be able to avoid capital gains distributions by selectively paying out appreciated stock in kind for redemptions.
50% VT. 10 % BA , 10% HON , 10% GOOG, 10% RSP . Last 10% speculative picks im feeling drones and space personally ONDS , RKLB ,and ASTS .. buy on red days . likely no 1 will agree with me and im ok with that
RSP is green I think spy will rocket soon!!
It's very heavily weighted towards the Magnificent 7. Tech takes a big hit and so do you. There are some S&P 500 etfs that are equally weighted so you don't die if any sector takes a big hit. Then you can put other money into stuff you believe in. I'm in RSP.
ah yes Let me be delusional enough to think that regional banks/banks, oil, and industrials are enough to push the SPX to a +10%/RSP +15% while the tech sector falls 20% on the year. Not. If it weren't for it being a new money flows period, we'd be seeing real issues here and as it is, tech is starting to pull everything else down with it again this afternoon.
Generally investing in passive broadly diversified funds like VOO and VTI make sense. As pointed out elsewhere, they overlap so pick one. The issue now is becoming that a few large tech consituents are an extremely high percentage of the index. It is worth temporarily considering an allocation to RSP, equal weighted S&P 500. I am also a big believer in global diversification, so consider adding an international developed (VE or IDEV) and an emerging ETF (EEM or VEA).
Money going into small caps, just like it always does in Januarys. Check IWM and RSP returns higher than S&P
i remember saying IWM and RSP will outperform SPY and QQQ, to which a certain boltard called me a retard.
If you want to see what the actual broader market looks like, compare to RSP. Equal weight sp500 is outpacing SPY = everything not tech doing well
XMAG -- your cost is going to be substantially higher though. .35 vs .03 with VOO. I know there are some other that equi-weight sectors. RSP is one I think and it looks like the expense ratio is .2 VTI is supposed to be more balanced with an expense ratio of .03, but even that tech is 32-ish percent.
I was thinking more like equal weight fund like RSP. Seems like a good hedge against over concentrations of top 7 companies.
Anyone who moved from SPY and Qs to RSP and IWM are too big brained for this sub
RSP up half a percent, 🌽 popping off with trash like gamestore We'll probably catch a bid on Monday if we don't have any weekend surprises
This is one of the more thoughtful portfolios I've seen posted here. you have a clear thesis, explicit criteria, and not just chasing the same 10 stocks everyone else owns. A few observations: What i like: \- the themes are real and underinvested: grid hardening, european defense, and space commercialization aren't crowded trades yet \- european defense exposure (Kongsberg, Leonardo, Saab, BAE, Safran, MTU) is timely - nato spending commitments aren't going away \- grid/energy plays (Nextracker, First Solar, Array, Hammond Power, Fluence) benefit from AI data center buildout without being AI stocks \- position sizing is sensible - nothing over 6%, so no single name blows you up \- RSP as core instead of SPY reduces mag7 concentration Things to consider: \- 24 individual positions is a lot to track, at some point it becomes a personal ETF, might be worth consolidating your lower-conviction 1-2% positions. \- 14% cash is meaningful, intentional dry powder for opportunities, or still deciding where to deploy? \- limited overlap with what everyone else owns means you'll have periods where you lag the index while mag7 runs, are you prepared for that mentally? Overall: you've done the work, the framework is solid, the themes make sense, and you're not overlapping with the crowded trades. This is what "active management" should look like - clear thesis, diversified bets within the thesis, reasonable position sizes. Good luck in 2026.
If you think 2026 will be another 15+% gain , VOO is no brainer. By the way, that would make it four year in a row higher than historically average and double digits gain, very rare. Or you can go with RSP, USMV purposely tame mega cap weighted VOO, just to sleep better at night. SNP is about 88% gain last five year, some 40% drop can wipe it out. Sure that is highly unlikely, how about 20%, 10%? 2027 and everyone’s beloved 2055 is to the moon for sure, just 2026 what do you think?
Yeah, unless something suddenly changes over the next few days, we might have to rule out 7200+ into February (which I’d slightly favor). Might get a tap of 7k at most and then “potentially” retest 6100ish. Doesn’t mean it can’t happen, but technically it would not be favored until tech shows some signs of really pushing hard because if the Dow/RSP have more in it, the index quoted would likely tap out just before 50k for at least a couple months…
-RSP outperforms SPY. I love the setup for everyone not mag 7 this year. This is like the second or third try at this, so eventually I'll be right. -Energy outperforms the S&P. Let's just measure it as XLE beats SPY. -Software has a banner year. The whole AI will replace legacy software narrative has run it's course. Most of these software applications are so integrated into enterprise operations that they will not go away. -SPY is up more than 10% Self explanatory.
There are plenty of options beyond the S&P 500 with far less AI bubble risk and lower valuations. Don’t have to buy bonds. \- RSP: equal-weight S&P 500 \- AVUV and AVDV: small-cap value \- VXUS: international ex-US \- XMHQ: mid cap quality
Max TFSA, max RSP contributions and put it all into VEQT. When you reach 1 million start buying other types of assets.
Up 27% in my play around account TFSA Up 14% in managed account RSP
That is true. VOO is tech heavy even though not as bad as QQQ. There's RSP which is equal weighted S&P500 which has not gone up as linearly as VOO in the past five years, but is surely going up on a longer time horizon. Another option is to have some exposure into international equities but they have not done well at all (take VEU for example). Or like you mentioned, we should pick and choose assets and allocate and manage manually. These days, even GLD is not a bad idea.
Based on his statement SPX didn't close higher than it opened either. Market open $6778.06 vs close $6774.76. Neither did QQQ, DJI, or RSP. What he's intentionally ignoring is the AH jump leading up to today's open. I'm not sure what significance that has...maybe it means something to some people? But yes, during normal trading hours everything went down.
Sure. SPY closed lower... But SPX closed higher. QQQ up 1.45%. DJI? up. RSP? up. It's ridiculous to imply today was bearish.
I would just buy an equal weight S&P ETF like RSP
Not sure if you could remove them, since there is weight to them and is probably hard to rebalance, meaning something else needs to take it's spot. I think looking at the equal weight is probably something closer to what you want. Something like the SPXEW or RSP.
The smart bols would have moved to either IWM or RSP by now drooling, cockeyed bols still sitting in Qs and SPY.
Because you’re only watching mega tech. Look at RSP.
Sorry and welcome. I'm 50% VOO and 50% equal weight S&P (RSP). I'm tired of paying short term cap gains to tie S&P performance.
A lot of overlap. I would switch out RSP for VOO.
Equal-weight S&P 500 (RSP) and international equity (VXUS)
There are plenty of academics skeptical about the FF5 model and other anomalies. For instance, Aswath Damodaran has seen no effect of the size premium since the early 1980s, when it was first observed by Banz. Andrew Lee has not seen any factor premium observed out of sample. The data from the Fama-French data library suggests that. After the FF3 model was established, the size premium has been zero in the US and positive but nearly zero (not statistically significant) in Developed ex-US and Emerging markets. It's been strongly negative in the US and negative in Developed ex-US and Emerging after the FF5 model was established. The investment premium has similarly been negative in the US (and essentially zero in Developed) after it was introduced as a factor in the FF5 model. I'm inclined to believe Damodaran's interpretation that "you have to do something to get something" for these factors. In any case, the smaller companies in the S&P 500 would still be considered large cap using the break points for Fama and French. There are better ways to decrease exposure to the Mag 7, if you were inclined to do so, than to use the RSP. There are much better ways to tilt towards SMB if you believed in the factor premium.
Just buy the equal-weight S&P 500 (RSP).
Consumer staples have almost never been this cheap as a sector (notwithstanding the overvaluation of COST and WMT). The tech sector has rarely had valuations as high as they are now. AAPL at a P/E of 37? C’mon. I’m in favour of buying the equal-weight S&P 500 (RSP) instead of VOO.
Try RSP. It's been a champ recently.
Equal weight is a volatility reducer period IMO. I hate when my RSP part of my portfolio is doing well because that means I’m losing money as a whole. If this equal weight thing spreads and becomes a contagion we may have a repeat of 2022 despite earnings growth.
I don’t think I’ve ever seen a week where so many analysts and tv pundits mentioned the RSP *this much*… Time to make some larger bets on the Mag 7, you mfers don’t fool me lol