VS

Imaginary-Bowl-4424

Online shopping! It provides a much more private VS shopping experience! 🛍️ 🙌

Michael_Korleone

Quite the mystery lululemon is always packed whenever I pass by it while VS is empty

Due_Marsupial_969

Also, you should at least have a vague idea (you don't have to be a genius like Leopold Aschenbrenner) what you're hedging out or actually trading. I've found that options is more like tennis than darts. Sometimes you think you're playing your opponent's lukewarm (conservative) serves but then halfway thru the match, you realize a bit too late that the match was more about his fitness and serve placement VS your fatness and weak returns. With a comfortable lead, he all of a sudden finds his first serves. He hedged correctly. My short put strangle on RDDT has been like this, but I think I caught it in time to adjust, so hopefully things go my way again on the reddit stock roller coaster. Love options.

WistopherWalken

Cameras VS LiDAR in Autonomous Vehicles – Why single sensor approaches fail – and how to implement LiDAR cost effectively https://silannasemi.com/can-autonomous-vehicles-rely-solely-on-cameras-or-how-can-lidar-be-adapted-to-reduce-the-cost-and-power-budget/

whatsgoingonhonestly

Ai infused panties from VS :pepeuwu:

jimjamjones123

Hell ya I’d watch, though the matches will likely be similar to kimbo VS dada which was terrible. So let’s incorporate lions and give the people what they want.

I_killed_the_kraken

Today VS tomorrow. https://preview.redd.it/p9pb91rox9oh1.png?width=959&format=png&auto=webp&s=7b6786cc60f73f0872074b473be62ee2e299e4cd

IsaacVu404

As I said, theta immunity give you rooms to make mistakes on the timing, and during bad situation if things go side way and delay the direction U don’t need to win big, u need to win more, consistently with highest safety and protections if u want to do this for 10-20-30years straight. I short Tesla and Spy the day before NFR right at the top. If u do options, the reports came out wrong and you’re cooked. U can’t catch the entire move from top if u do options, because options u need to wait for confirmation, which is already late, while shorting allow you to front run any event or headline noise. So you either choose: \- Shorting Tsla directly at $384 before NFP VS - Buying expensive Puts when Tsla open at $360 with confirmation

ErdingEchoParadox

 yes, boss, thank you, boss.

EuroPoor-NoodleLover

Now this has some reasoning but GTA is mainly violent and "boy-ish" game, that girls hot enough to wear VS lingerie don't want to have common grounds with. Source : how many girls have you seen dressed as the blonde from the GTA V and she was a bombshell to say at least. Probably some e-girls will buy especially for cosplay reasons, but I don't see that as 44% growth stated in the DD. Otherwise it's a nice piece of mea... clothing, but I don't see the strong connection realise.

Nictel

What kind of man are you? Either look up the Goku VS. Freeza fight scene or Android 18.

Nilaru

So you're guessing that VS is going to buy playboy because you think it would be a good idea? Not a single ounce of actual evidence or facts or literally anything other than "yeah they should do that"? Sounds about par for the course for this sub.

Fortnait739595958

Well, this one even if the trial failed(which doesn't seems like it, but anything is possible), stil has a commercial available product already in the market, Avmapki Fakzynja Co-pack that generated 25 million in revenue in Q2, VS-7375 its not their only shot

Altruistic-Room2683

Why.? Playboy is a POS, dying brand. VS is better off burning that money.

rair21

I picked up shares after earnings at 1.20. I think it's an easy double. Excellent point about VS scaling Honey Birdette. Would be wise. Playboy can't damage VS reputation any worse than it already is right now either.

Fortnait739595958

Verastem, google VS-7375 which is in phase 2 and look for opinions of patients in reddit, facebook...

Melancholic_Noodle

Which sounds nice but in the end you're just talking allt of hot air. What matters is *performance* and I dare you and all other financial advisors to *prove your performance*. Since you obviously can't beat the market that's impossible. But let's add taxes then, prov ehownmixhvthe average person can save by correct tax planning (hint, it's less then 5 hours of a financial advisors fee). Or how about this so called safety that causes a *massive underperformance* compared to any index? In the end everyone here and the averge person is *better off paying $10 000 a year to have a guy repond "No" whenever you call". That's your "should I" guy. When you see a stock tip on reddit or discord, call him. When a sleazy financial advisor (snake oil salesman) wants to talk about *anything kit performance before/after fees* you call him. Or when Trump gets extra stupid and invades Syria because why not, you call him I statistically (my ass) guarantee "Mr no" will over 30 years cost less and perform better then any financial advisor. Anyone who claims otherwise can start calculating taxes VS your fee and we'll see how luch you "save" people. Usually a fat engative

Yachtitect

My DD concurs with your thesis. All of the E-girls I simp for have VS in their throne lists.

Fortnait739595958

Not finalcial advice, but google "verastem VS-7375" and the opinions of those in the trial to understand why it will be the next big thing against cancer

AndItsThetaAgain

VS has some terrible quality anymore, I’ve been in several times and disappointed each time. Bought nothing

Equivalent_Party3713

This is not the only bullish catalyst for VS THEY released a perfume in the last couple days and it’s printing https://preview.redd.it/038q4phg0lmh1.jpeg?width=1206&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=bd668dd75c5cc8bfca160ad57fecf2de7bf99095

JollyGreenVampire

still needs VS thong

Zipski577

Sure, but only one party ever tried to make that a thing tho. Social justice hasn’t really been a focus in America over the last few years even on areas beyond body positivity but race and gender, etc. OZEMPIC was also approved in 2017 (9 years ago). So it’s not new at this point and even the “viral” social media trends and cultural shift began in 2020. Victoria Secret just started turning it around and churning over the last year. Victoria Secret’s CFO openly said on an earnings call in late 2019 that the company evolves their marketing based on the views of of the economy when they faced backlash over lack of in inclusivity. In Q1 2025 call after Trump inauguration the CEO said they planned to strategically make marketing sexier and “reestablish the brand's magic.” Also that their “cross functional team has was reading and reacting not only to sales but what they are seeing out in the world.” Also # of plus sized models in fashion shows declined over the last 2 years. Again, “Ozempic” virality and culture came to prominence 6 years ago. [Body positivity is not ‘over’](https://www.advocate.com/health/body-positivity-is-not-over) [**How The Trump Administration’s Conservative Policies And Messaging Are Reshaping Body Image Standards For American Women**](https://ifstudies.org/in-the-news/how-the-trump-administrations-conservative-policies-and-messaging-are-reshaping-body-image-standards-for-american-women) [“But since Trump’s reelection and the abrupt attempt at a return to pre-pandemic normalcy, Underwood’s approach to organizing has shifted.”](https://www.advocate.com/health/body-positivity-is-not-over) I focus on biopharma stocks primarily and have thoroughly researched obesity drug market and pipeline, and opportunity in terms of TAM, and there is still plenty of ‘meat on the bone’ so to speak in terms of overweight ppl that can’t access or afford them. But yea the rise in weight loss drugs is prob 90% of the shift in Victoria Secret success and shift away from body positivity campaigns and messaging as a whole, for sure. But lessened fear of being canceled/ getting negative media or political backlash has allowed for shifts to become normal. 6 years ago there was still complaints about size inclusivity in things like fashion shows getting media attention, now the media couldn’t be bothered to cover something like that. Also other apparel companies like Abercrombie also have been strong in recent earnings and I think they’ve really made positive strategic changes in recent years to adapt their brand to modern fashion trends. I’m not a woman but I imagine VS has made a lot of strategic product/ fashion/ trend decisions like that that have also greatly driven their success. So there’s a lot of components outside of body positivity shit that driving success. And VS aside, body positivity fading has mainly had to do with GLP1/ obesity drug rise. But Trump hasn’t exactly been known to promote inclusivity (“Rosie ODonnell is a “fat pig”), and when dems take over I’m sure inclusivity/ acceptance as a whole will make a return to some level of importance

TheMightyAmuseBouche

I thought I'd have to scroll longer before finding someone that said this lol. VS has really tanked in quality but it hasn't gotten any cheaper, I haven't bought anything from them in years.

willzyx01

Because Lulu has too much competition from Alo now. VS doesn't have an equal competition.

RaydelRay

Has Dumb Money talked about VS?

fusillade762

Bro, they will go to SHEIN, not VS. VS is a dinosaur in the lingerie space. I'm an Internet Thongologist btw. I have a doctorate in contemporary thong from the Sonoran Desert Institute.

user-namepending

Don't know think Lucia is wearing VS because the trend is already in full force and not the reverse? She's not forecasting anything she **IS** the signal.

sg_minx

I know lots of women since I am one. The point is no one I know wears VS. Maybe activate said brain cells. VS the other.

killer_reindeer

Brother GTA 6 is going to tank VS's stock bb y the amount of virginity it is going to conserve

imphooeyd

Woman here, VS are shit grade lingerie that no longer even have 100% cotton options (wanna know how to reliably make pum pum stink? synthetic fabrics). This truly is one of the most regarded sentiments I’ve read on this sub. Hats off to OP.

Gmoney1412

Huge Q4 for VS as women try and lure their partners away from GTA6

BillNyeForPrez

Or couples making a deal that she gets to splurge at VS

BloodMossHunter

I cant believe VS marketing keeps thinking of ways. Like they put the underwear part outside outerwear so people can see victoria secret branding. Next up vs tails

Zipski577

Yes it is worth more than Lulu. Clothing trends change and companies fade away but lingerie has stood the test of time for hundreds of years. Also, Lulu’s growth plan is to double their men’s apparel segment. VS on the other hand has capitalized on me too libs not being in office and body positivity campaigns being replaced with sex appeal, hot girls, tits, and ass being restored. Also obesity drugs have become more accessible and more effective, so that will continue to bring a whole new cohort of customers that previously were ruled out of TAM for obvious reasons

HeftyBox3580

Always knew which day VS catalogs were going to be mailed the house as a kid 😏

sg_minx

Yeah? Your brain cells? Lol I don’t know a single woman who still wears VS…

VegaGT-VZ

Yep the only way this makes money is if VS licenses this as DLC I wanna know what regarded sub thought this was a solid thesis

SeemsAirworthy

I assumed this was going another direction, women buying VS to lure their men back away from the game after release.

jrlandry

Before opening the post, I assumed your reasoning was gonna be chicks spending more at VS to try and get their man’s attention away from the game lol

5appy

10/10 meta gaming, personally I have no faith in the consumer and rather chase guaranteed money in energy, chips, and defense but this is definitely a potentially clever play, gonna keep an eye on VS

BriackYOLO

“Lucia's room is pink as shit" had me dead though. If retail actually starts aping into VS because of Rockstar character art, the simulation is completely broken 🥴

muffpatty


agent674253

And then SpaceX paid $60b for a fork of VS Code 😆

Livid-Skirt-245

we are not a myth. As a woman, I am disappointed I didn't think of VS

CantaloupeSea48

Actually the United States has supported peaceful Nuclear energy. Nucleaur power only requires 3-5% enrichment VS 90% for weapons grade. Ironically, our subs and other Navy vessels require 90%. That said, Saudi Arabia has apparently agreed to being inspected by the International Atomic Energy Agency for compliance. The same deal Trump offered to the Iranians.

confectioncake

Also, fragrance is becoming more popular and Victoria's Secret is really stepping up its game in that arena. It's not a little selection anymore; it's a whole wing of the store. Bath & Body Works is probably losing customers to the VS.

sa-sa-sa-soma

what's our expertise today? geopolitical economics? china? VS lingerie was yesterday

Charming_Raccoon4361

US , russia, china, and iran VS canada and EU

wallstreetstonks

Love how VS has a higher multiple than MU.

RuleSafe6767

Pumped on light volume; they need retail to come up under it to firm up to sell. Look up the lipstick recession indicator. Yes, women who got skinny on glp1 are gonna buy themselves a couple $200 bras, but these aren't staple clothing that most women will be buying on an ongoing basis. So my guess is the VS trade is timed to perfection (quarterly results + glp1 story + stock pump), so yeah, time to fire up the WSB marketing machine.

mds4bc

Wives don't shop therel lol. Increase in VS is directly related to increase in single women of reproductive age.

whunnderbug

VS has been offering plus sizes since 2019. They were just late to the inclusivity game and lost a ton of market share to inclusive competitors, like you mentioned. Not to mention the executive scandals. The new strategic direction under Hillary Super is working phenomenally. I’d reconsider your stance and take a look at what Mrs. Super has done and is continuing to do with the company. She expanded Savage X Fenty for Rihanna and was a main driving force behind Anthropologie before that.

interstellara_

Lost 140 lbs on GLP-1s, thrift all my clothes from Vinted (app) and goodwill with the occasional splurge from Vuori. I do buy my undies brand new but… Would never touch Victoria’s Secret because there are better lingerie companies. I’m more likely to buy from Target or aerie for everyday and soma or Nordstrom for fancy shit. this advice is written by a man for men because women aren’t buying this, lmao good luck. VS bras aren’t very good for the money.

MeadowofSnow

As a woman I personally remember VS from it's hayday, both in store and online. They got rid of clothing, which they did used to have some ok clothes. They never embraced larger sizes or aging bodies... like at all. This is a huge mistake in my book. So their appeal is to a very slim margin of young women with a good amount of disposable income (thats not really a thing now). They are also now competing with every celeb like Skims and Fenti. Unless VS is getting aquired in some way I haven't heard about, I'd stay away from this one. Most likely it's just getting ripped up by private equity.

Jealous-Network3631

If im not mistaken, there was a regard who was counting the foot traffic info VS a few years back, he was not wrong lol.

Ok-Progress-6153

As far as VS goes- speaking as someone in fashion and casting… Rihanna’s fenty ate their lunch for a minute but the quality sucks and many are not returning to the brand. Also VS casting went a bit performative on the body inclusivity train, now they’ve reeled it in I think there’s a good middle ground. Would definitely predict upward sales

Skittler_On_The_Roof

It's a fun theory but I'm doubting it's actually been the driver in the 300% rally.  This is a $2B company adding $4B to the market cap.  If 10% of Americans are on GLP1s and half of them buy lingerie, that's like 20M people.  Assuming half of them are shopping at VS, that's 10M people.  That's a $400 increase per customer.  I don't buy it when it doesn't impact 90% of the population. Folks will recall the downfall of $VSXY not too long ago. It wasn't a shortage of skinny chicks causing it.  It was their inability to convince existing customers that their stuff was worth the premium over really inexpensive fast fashion competitors that were eating their lunch. It sounds like they've started to turn that around while raising prices.  Their profit increase, not actual sales, is the most impressive stat.

allurboobsRbelong2us

This trade was years in the making. VS changed their structure a couple years back when they realized the woke advertising wasn’t working. My regarded ass just didn’t listen to my obnoxious coworker who bought a bunch at the low. He also said something about Jack in the Box.

imnotokayandthatso-k

I've banged enough fat chicks to know that they also wear VS and feel plenty sexy without the zempic Immaterial.

Huge-Ad-8210

That’s a horrific photo to use for an advertisement. VS needs to return to the angels that people would change their religion for, not these couch potato hoes.

Aggravating-Blood-18

GLP 1 working here. used to be plus sized middle aged ladies buying TF outta VS because they couldn't when they were younger

Charming-Animal-8856

I love VS! All these escorts love it! Winning!

Flrg808

It is related. AI making nerds rich. Nerds hire escorts who are the only smuts still buying VS

onelifestand101

You know it’s funny as a degen and a woman on a GLP1, I should have seen this trade from a mile away. Hell I even went out and bought a VS bra which I hadn’t done in like 10 years. Instead I looked nice in my new bra as I lost thousands on DRAM, ASTS, and every other stupid stock. I guess that’s why I deserve to be here.

003E003

You don't need the 500 underlyings to have predictive power trading SPX for example. Spend some time looking at the product that Vol Signals puts out, VS3D, and I think you might change your mind. I have not affiliation but I am a customer. Knowing the customer type does allow you to track inventory over time and build accurate positions across time. It is not easy and it is not cheap. But it absolutely can be done and is being done. If you have not seen it or if you are not knowledgeable enough to know how to interpret it (some of the common thought processes around GEX are wrong).....then you are right it can't help you. If you do know, it can. Your brain has been poisoned by the "naive GEX" you have been exposed to. Once you are exposed to the correct numbers you might change your mind. All "GEX" is not the same.

2QuarterDollar

When Saylor VS Schiff ppv

West_Lavishness6689

I went full YOLO on RYCEY, cashed out earlier this year, decided to call it quits. i guess i beat SP500. had AI work the numbers based on date/average i invested and sold VS sp500 if i entered the same time and exited. Results: April 1, 2022 - April 17, 2026 Performance Comparison * **RYCEY Cumulative Return:** \~1,248.3% * **RYCEY Annualized Return (CAGR):** \~84.7% per year * **S&P 500 Cumulative Return:** \~56.8% * **S&P 500 Annualized Return (CAGR):** \~11.8% per year

OkSubject8801

Yes. Download VS code and integrate claude that way. Works perfectly I even have it doing prediction market bets for me

Dude_HaHa

If CAKE and KO can do it, I dont doubt VS at all

justpasingbai

SNDK EARNINGS? EPS 39.25 actual VS 34.52 REVENUE 8.965B actual VS 8.39B

justpasingbai

SNDK EARNINGS: EPS 39.25 actual VS 34.52 REVENUE 8.965B actual VS 8.39B THIS EVEN BEAT WALL STREET EXPECTATIONS WHY FALLING

justpasingbai

EPS 39.25 VS 34.52 REVENUE 8.965B VS 8.39B isnt this a beat even for ws?

Uhhhhhhhhhhhuhhh

Lowkey true as fuck, weighing the ups and downs the worst outcome seems to be not investing Inflation eats your savings VS absolute worst case scenario of short-mid term temporary loss if you invest sensibly You dont make money by saving money

NotGucci

>ISM U.S. MANUFACTURING ACTIVITY INDEX 55.6 IN JULY (CONSENSUS 54.0) VS 53.3 IN JUNE More K-type economy. Again recession isn't coming anytime soon, and economy still remains K-type which will contunue to drive the market high. 8k by EOY is highly likely.

duboilburner

Yeah, I used to use SPYvsGME dotcom for that. But then I realized most "GEX" was built using naive assumptions: that all calls are sold short to dealers, making dealers long the call gamma, and that all puts are bought by customers, making dealers short the put gamma. But this isn't accurate to what's actually going on. Unfortunately, the only tickers you can actually obtain the accurate positioning for in terms of what dealers are actually long and short is SPX and VIX, and for those, you do indeed have to pay CBOE a tidy sum of money to get it (or another service that buys the data from CBOE and calculates a way to display it, such as Unusual Whales' Persicope, OptionsDepth or VS3D). So, if you are to take what an actual Market maker would tell you they would do to hedge certain exposures as we move through them, it would not apply to the naive model because it's not what the market makers actually have on their books. Not saying it's not somewhat helpful info. You can at least see which strikes have the most exposure and if it's mostly puts or calls, but we don't actually know if dealers are actually net long or net short gamma at each strike using the naive model.

RedditLeagueAccount

I said unless you have a data point. Glad you do. I am fine with being proven wrong. My graphs and links were the VOO VS VTI part of the conversation. We will also run into a phase at some point where active managers might beat the passive indexes because they can predict and make profits off of the known changes different passive funds might make to rebalance or add new stocks to their holdings.

dwoj206

yes I built with claude CLI & VS Code an automated trading bot. 100K port, 2% max position size. 10% max port exposure, 5 concurrent positions total. It's a process, but it's working decently well. There's entire /r's for that shit though. We're here to lose money ourselves like real men!

-sakuranbo

I'll triple down on the retardation. American labs collapsing has zero effect on DeepSeek, Mistral, etc. AWS will continue being able to fleece enterprises by leasing them 2010-era hardware (as they have been for the past decade). If the AI "bubble" pops, maybe you'll have to go back to VS Code instead using some VC-funded fork like Cursor. That's it. You'll still be able to send your erotic roleplay transcripts to AWS/GCP/Azure. You'll still be able to use something like pi or Codex to generate code, just maybe with DeepSeek V4 Pro (which is roughly equivalent to Claude Sonnet 4.6) instead of Claude 5 Fable. Even in this scenario, hardware startups like Cerebras are in a pretty good spot, since their hardware is reprogrammable (it's a common misconception that they build ASICs, but that's just not true). TL;DR: the bubble can pop and almost nothing important changes for users or adoption.

broke_person

Another day of MAG 7 cancelling each other out LMFAOOOOOO YESTERDAY META VS MSFT TODAY APPLE VS AMAZON LMAOOO 🤌🤌🤌🤌

IvoryTowerResident

\*ARM HOLDINGS Q1 ADJ EPS $0.45 VS IBES ESTIMATE $0.40 \*ARM HOLDINGS Q1 REV $1.29 BLN VS IBES ESTIMATE $1.26 BLN \*ARM HOLDINGS OUTLOOK Q2 REV $1.38 BLN VS IBES ESTIMATE $1.34 BLN \*ARM HOLDINGS OUTLOOK Q2 ADJ EPS $0.47 VS IBES ESTIMATE $0.43 lets see if things hold

Spy300

>>US CPI (MOM) (JUN) ACTUAL: -0.4% VS 0.5% PREVIOUS; EST -0.1% >US CORE CPI (MOM) (JUN) ACTUAL: 0.0% VS 0.2% PREVIOUS; EST 0.2% >U.S. MANUFACTURING JOB LOSSES HIT WORST LEVEL SINCE THE PANDEMIC >US NONFARM PAYROLLS (JUN) ACTUAL: 57K VS 172K PREVIOUS; EST 113K Its actually surprise rate cuts

Spy300

>US CPI (MOM) (JUN) ACTUAL: -0.4% VS 0.5% PREVIOUS; EST -0.1% >US CORE CPI (MOM) (JUN) ACTUAL: 0.0% VS 0.2% PREVIOUS; EST 0.2% >U.S. MANUFACTURING JOB LOSSES HIT WORST LEVEL SINCE THE PANDEMIC >US NONFARM PAYROLLS (JUN) ACTUAL: 57K VS 172K PREVIOUS; EST 113K Its actually surprise rate cuts

Clearsky_Beyond

MU VS SNDK dump race

Spy300

>US CPI (MOM) (JUN) ACTUAL: -0.4% VS 0.5% PREVIOUS; EST -0.1% >US CORE CPI (MOM) (JUN) ACTUAL: 0.0% VS 0.2% PREVIOUS; EST 0.2% >U.S. MANUFACTURING JOB LOSSES HIT WORST LEVEL SINCE THE PANDEMIC >US NONFARM PAYROLLS (JUN) ACTUAL: 57K VS 172K PREVIOUS; EST 113K Its actually surprise rate cuts.

Spy300

>US CPI (MOM) (JUN) ACTUAL: -0.4% VS 0.5% PREVIOUS; EST -0.1% >US CORE CPI (MOM) (JUN) ACTUAL: 0.0% VS 0.2% PREVIOUS; EST 0.2% >U.S. MANUFACTURING JOB LOSSES HIT WORST LEVEL SINCE THE PANDEMIC Its actually surprise rate cuts

Spy300

>US CPI (MOM) (JUN) ACTUAL: -0.4% VS 0.5% PREVIOUS; EST -0.1% >US CORE CPI (MOM) (JUN) ACTUAL: 0.0% VS 0.2% PREVIOUS; EST 0.2% >U.S. MANUFACTURING JOB LOSSES HIT WORST LEVEL SINCE THE PANDEMIC Markets giving 1% chance of a cut seems wrong

Connect-Vehicle-4982

On the VS3D cost question — one thing to factor in beyond the monthly price: watch their free-trial billing. I did the 7-day trial, decided it wasn't for me (SPX-only, and I trade both SPX and NDX), never upgraded to paid — and got auto-charged $299 the moment the trial ended. Their own Terms, Section 6, literally say the account *"will not be charged and the subscription will be suspended until upgraded to a paid version"* at the end of the trial. I never upgraded, so by their own wording it should've been suspended, not charged. Emailed support twice, no reply, now disputing it with my bank. Not a knock on their data quality — just flagging it since you're weighing whether the $300 is worth it. If you do trial it, watch that first charge and cancel well before day 7.

Connect-Vehicle-4982

Long-time lurker — a year on here and this is literally my first comment. What finally made me post is a heads-up I wish someone had given me about the VS3D free trial. I signed up for the 7-day trial in July, looked at it for a couple of days, and decided it wasn't for me (it's SPX-only, and I trade both SPX and NDX). I never upgraded to a paid plan, and — trusting their own Terms — I moved on and forgot about it. Right after the trial ended I was charged $299. Their own Terms & Conditions, Section 6 (Subscriptions), literally state: *"The account will not be charged and the subscription will be suspended until upgraded to a paid version at the end of the free trial."* I never upgraded — so by their own wording it should have been suspended, not charged. (Section 6 + the invoice below.) I emailed their support the day of the charge and followed up 5 days later — no reply at all. **For a company that markets itself as reputable, going completely silent on a simple billing question is a strange look.** I'm now disputing it with my bank. I'm not knocking the quality of their research — just flagging the trial billing so nobody gets caught the same way. Check Section 6 before you start the trial. https://preview.redd.it/wwy9o3nmqsfh1.png?width=1249&format=png&auto=webp&s=1dcf6d08e4e8b128f29a8138dad904df2ceda36e

SnooBananas1371

Because being rich at 55+ via long term investing sucks because you don’t have much time left and you are more to halfway done with life VS being rich at 25-35 when you are young, full of vigor, and lots of time to experience everything life have to offer and not stuck in a fucking cubicle.

Independent-Use-228

AMZN is my hedge. I'm rolling the dice on AVGO VS TSM. Someone say it for me. The bank is ready.

Ltiform

Of course it Vs when I don't play the V because we've only had FAKE VS FOR WEEKS HJFGUEOHFG4QWFGJ3QWOE

MrJohnDoe_R

Tools like OptionDepth and VS3D don't use naive GEX but actual postions provided by CBOE.

Broken_leo

Argentina VS Switzerland:both teams to score in second half

I-IV-I64-V-I

BRICS VS CUM cant make that shit upp

Ehh_WhatNow

Did you watch the USA VS Australia match? Australia is terrible.

-sakuranbo

My company (and others) have migrated to Codex and GPT-5.5. Know about a dozen people who went back to VS Code from Cursor. Somehow, that means puts on MSFT...

Vizionz4K

"I know there's differences in the buisness model and margin and McD's has been growing while Wendy's has been stagnant for past couples years and, and, and.. but forget all that for a second." Why?... You want us to explain to you why the difference without using the why? I don't get your question entirely?.. Please explain to me why an apple is a fruit without giving me any characteristics and, and, and... Pretty hard right? Seriously tho, it's not just about YOUR experience, feeling ect about Wendy's VS McD's in YOUR area/place of living. McDonald's operate in more than 3.5x more country than Wendy's, that's alot. Another big point, McD's is actually a real estate company, whoch Wendy's isn't.

LarryBlink

APLD VS IREN APLD: Contracted 1.4GW, 100MW operatational IREN: Contracted 200MW, 0MW operational, RIP in pepperonis IREN bag holders

LarryBlink

APLD VS IREN APLD: Contracted 1.4GW, 100MW operatational IREN: Contracted 200MW, 0MW operational, RIP in pepperonis IREN bag holders