Reddit Posts
How to trade crypto delisted from CoinBase?
TIL that Pablo Escobar’s brother tried his hand making crypto tokens, 1 being a hard fork of BTC called DDX - DietBitcoin
Coinbase Will Delist 7 Altcoins From Its Platform: BarnBridge (BOND), DerivaDAO (DDX), Jupiter (JUP), Multichain (MULTI), Ooki (OOKI) and Voyager (VGX)
6 Ethereum Altcoins Targeted By SEC Ahead of Coinbase Wells Notice
How to Buy Highstreet (HIGH) and DerivaDAO (DDX) Cryptocurrency?
Mentions
I’m not representing it to be fresh news, only fresh to me :) I’ve actually be quite vocal about that throughout the whole thread! Also yes this article is for 2019, and his coins DDX, DDX 2.0, and ESCOBAR have all quite literally shit the bed. If you look on coinmarketcap for DietBitcoin you’ll find it with its symbol DDX but I could only get it to pop up by typing out the full name. I couldn’t find the rear of the coins he’s launched on there but if you check out the official websites they have one dietbitcoinICO.something, it’s an interestingly odd page it seems to promote the same cryptocurrencies Roberto claimed were “scam gringo coins made by the Americanos”. This whole little rabbit holes been pretty interesting to me researching and tying this together with the history I already knew of the family and events around them! I’m glad you enjoyed it too ❤️
You guys aren’t holding DDX too?
This article is from 2019. There is a DDX listed on Coinmarketcap, but it's a DEX called Deriva Dao.
tldr; Roberto Escobar, brother of notorious drug lord Pablo Escobar, has been accused of running cryptocurrency scams. Roberto and Olof Gustafsson, co-founder of Escobar Inc., launched a cryptocurrency called Dietbitcoin (DDX) in 2018. The coin was marketed as a faster version of Bitcoin and raised over $1 million in its initial coin offering (ICO). However, the project was abandoned months later, leaving investors in the lurch. In 2019, Escobar relaunched DDX as Dietbitcoin 2.0, an Ethereum-based token, but increased the coin's supply, reducing each token holder's investment to less than 1% of its original value. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR. Try our free crypto chatbot at https://chat.coinfeeds.io*
BarnBridge (BOND) DerivaDAO (DDX) Jupiter (JUP) Multichain (MULTI) Ooki (OOKI) Voyager (VGX). Not missing out on much..
BarnBridge (BOND), DerivaDAO (DDX), Jupiter (JUP), Multichain (MULTI), Ooki (OOKI) and Voyager (VGX). Save a click for people.
It would have been nice to know that DDX was being fucking delisted from Coinbase. Why don’t they post that shit on Coinbase so people don’t fucking buy it.
What the fuck is going on with DDX
I’m fucking done. Bought nest and it plummets 15% ten minutes after buying. I buy DDX after it falls 20% and it proceeds to fall another 15% fuck my life man
Lol bought DDX after it dropped 17% an and it still dropped another 6%. I am done grading.
tldr; Coinbase, a cryptocurrency exchange, has announced that it will delist seven altcoins from its platform. The altcoins being delisted are BarnBridge (BOND), DerivaDAO (DDX), Jupiter (JUP), Multichain (MULTI), Ooki (OOKI), and Voyager (VGX). Coinbase did not provide an explanation for the delisting. The exchange stated that it regularly checks whether the assets on its platform comply with listing standards. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR. Try our free crypto chatbot at https://chat.coinfeeds.io*
The nine tokens they are talking about are: AMP, RLY, DDX, XYO, RGT, LCX, POWR, DFX and KROM. Had to dig through the lawyers arguments to find this.
tldr; The Securities and Exchange Commission has listed nine crypto tokens as unregistered securities. The tokens are AMP, Rally, Rally (RLY), DerivaDEX (DDX), XYO, Rari Governance Token (RGT), LCX, Powerledger (POWR), DFX, and Kromatika (KROM). The first seven are listed on Coinbase for trading. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.*
tldr; The Securities and Exchange Commission has listed nine crypto tokens as unregistered securities. The tokens are AMP, Rally, Rally (RLY), DerivaDEX (DDX), XYO, Rari Governance Token (RGT), LCX, Powerledger (POWR), DFX, and Kromatika (KROM). The first seven are listed on Coinbase for trading. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.*
AMP, RLY, DDX, XYO, RGT, LCX, POWR, DFX and KROM). Not sure if thats what you mean but i read your statement as the reverse
Here are the 9 tokens which the article fails to mention: * AMP * RLY * DDX * XYO * RGT * LCX * POWR * DFX * KROM
>But explain to me how a XRP co-founder cashing out over 3 billion someone selling an asset is not a part of the howey test nor is it relevant. >and people buying expecting the price to increase isn't a security? There is no investment contract because there is no common enterprise. "In order to satisfy the “common enterprise” aspect of the Howey test, federal courts require that there be either “horizontal commonality” or “vertical commonality.” See Revak v. SEC Realty Corp" and ""(discussing horizontal commonality as “the tying of each individual investor’s fortunes to the fortunes of the other investors by the pooling of assets, usually combined with the pro-rata distribution of profits” and two variants of vertical commonality, which focus “on the relationship between the promoter and the body of investors”)" The problem in these cases the SEC is trying to stretch the definition in every way possible hoping something eventually sticks. "The Commission, on the other hand, does not require vertical or horizontal commonality per se, nor does it view a “common enterprise” as a distinct element of the term “investment contract.” -Source https://www.sec.gov/files/dlt-framework.pdf The SEC is choosing to ignore the supreme court because it cant give a detailed explanation nor can they connect what does or doesnt constitute the common enterprise which is required for there to be an investment contract. In the LBRY case they are trying to claim https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FUlgX1rVUAAtow8?format=jpg&name=900x900 Which basically saying, anything that could possibly appreciate and be traded in a secondary market becomes an investment contract. which is insane. In the Ripple case they are arguing that they dont need vertical or horizontal commonality to have an investment contract. Which is also insane and now this recent Wire fraud / Insider trading scandal with (AMP, RLY, DDX, XYO, RGT, LCX, POWR, DFX, KROM). . They are now stating these are securities A: they dont have the power to do B: In some of the cases they dont have the jurisdiction to take them to court to even determine their status (LCX is based in Lichtenstein not USA) C: They havnt named any of those founders nor companies as defendants, so they cant defend themselves over their status. D: They will use this as grounds and precedent to go after any exchange that listed these tokens in the USA. The SEC is trying Any and every possible way to try and gain power over the Crypto space. and so far thanks to Ripple in part as well as hopefully LBRY, they wont get it. next up to defend the entire space tho is a guy who committed wire fraud and insider trading. He doesnt have the capital to have 9 mini trials to determine the status of each of these assets, nor to defend coinbase (who wont get to defend themselves) He'll most likely take a plea deal with includes him having to admit they are securities and he knew they always have been / were.
With only a quick look and basic understanding this appears to be a good thing for the space as a whole, and in some ways it is. Once you dig deeper tough, the problem is that there are multiple horrible legal precedents that the SEC is trying to sneak into this case which is supposed to only be about the issue of insider trading/wire fraud **Issue #1** The first is that the SEC is stating that 9 Assets are unregistered securities in this case (AMP, RLY, DDX, XYO, RGT, LCX, POWR, DFX, KROM). The SEC is not just accusing the defendants of breaking the law. The SEC is accusing 10 unrelated, uncharged companies of breaking the law (9 assets and 1 exchange) Not only does the SEC not have the power to this, they dont give detailed legal analysis as to how they came to this conclusion. I posted this yesterday but the SEC is using the same shady tactics it is using in the LBRY and Ripple case in an attempt to regulate by enforcement and expand its power. In order for something to be a security one of the 4 prongs of the howey test is that there is an Investment contract. The supreme court has ruled that there must be a Common Enterprise in order for there to be an investment contract. >"In order to satisfy the “common enterprise” aspect of the Howey test, federal courts require that there be either “horizontal commonality” or “vertical commonality.” See Revak v. SEC Realty Corp" to explain further >"(discussing horizontal commonality as “the tying of each individual investor’s fortunes to the fortunes of the other investors by the pooling of assets, usually combined with the pro-rata distribution of profits” and two variants of vertical commonality, which focus “on the relationship between the promoter and the body of investors”)" and what does the SEC's do with this information? Well in their own words though they have stated that it doesnt matter and are ignoring this requirement. >"The Commission, on the other hand, does not require vertical or horizontal commonality per se, nor does it view a “common enterprise” as a distinct element of the term “investment contract.” -Source https://www.sec.gov/files/dlt-framework.pdf The SEC is choosing to ignore the supreme court because it cant give a detailed explanation nor can they connect what does or doesnt constitute the common enterprise which is required for there to be an investment contract. In fact, One of the assets they listed as a security (LCX) Isnt even founded in the USA, Its from Liechtenstein. This means the SEC has no grounds nor jurisdiction to take LCX to court (which would be required to make it a security) This case is going to end up needing 9 mini trials to determine the status of each of these assets and the defendants/issuers will not get to have their day in court to defend their status because they aren't named defendants by the SEC. **Issue #2** They arent going after the issuers, nor the exchange which apparently traded these "illegal securities offerings" Instead they go after a single person and his family for multiple reasons. 1. The guy is not going to have the capital to fight this because he will have to argue how and why all 9 of these assets failed to register as digital asset security's and how one exchange was operating and unregistered national securities exchange. (not gonna happen) 2. Hes going to therefore have to accept a plea deal and admit to whatever they want (including that these assets are securities and he knew they were the whole time) 3. This case will be used as the legal precedent to start going after exchanges (many of these assets are listed on other exchanges in the US) now exchanges have to either Delist the assets or face possible SEC action against them (we saw what happened when all the US exchanges de-risked by delisting XRP), it is going to cause turmoil, big fucking dips and could prolong a bear market maybe even indefinitely. Since the SEC didnt name any of the exchanges nor issuers of tokens as defendants, they wont be allowed to defend themselves in court. This is regulation by enforcement via a shady backdoor. a Commissioner of the CFTC came out yesterday and released a statement clashing with the SEC and their regulation by enforcement tactics https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/SpeechesTestimony/phamstatement072122 to clarify, I'm not trying to pass over/ignore the insider trading or fraud allegations in any way. If the allegations are true, the defendants should be held accountable for their actions/decisions. But we need to & should condemn both the defendants' alleged conduct & the SEC's unjust tactics as well.
TLDR: Coinbase has listed Te Flexa Network’s AMP, Rally Network (RLY), DerivaDEX (DDX), XYO, Rari Governance Token (RGT), and Lichenstein Cryptoasset Exchange (LCX). Others are Power Ledger (POWR), DFX Finance (DFX), and Kromatilka (KROM). SEC believes these to be securities and therefore CB “100% disagrees with the SEC’s decision to file these securities fraud charges".
“The assets were: AMP, RLY, DDX, XYO, RGT, LCX, POWR, DFX, KROM. They were each mentioned in connection with alleged insider trading.”
There actually alleging 9 other crypto as securities those of which are : AMP, RLY, DDX, XYO, RGT, LCX, POWR, DFX, KROM.
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2022/comp-pr2022-127.pdf >24\. A digital token or crypto asset is a crypto asset security if it meets the definition of a security, which the Securities Act defines to include “investment contract,” i.e., if it constitutes an investment of money, in a common enterprise, with a reasonable expectation of profit derived from the efforts of others. As described in greater detail below, during the relevant period, Ishan provided material, nonpublic information about, and Nikhil and Ramani traded in, **at least nine crypto asset securities that meet this definition**. The SEC says AMP, RLY, DDX, XYO, RGT, LCX, POWR, DFX, and KROM are all securities.
the SEC is alleging that there were 9 digital assets that are securities, but they dont explain their analysis for even one. They also dont sue/go after the exchange where it was traded or the issuers of the tokens AKA The people with the resources to fight back, they simply went after a guy and his family. This is quite interesting since the 9 assets in question (AMP, RLY, DDX, XYO, RGT, LCX, POWR, DFX, KROM.) would each require their own smaller trial in order to be considered a security. I find it hilarious that are now focusing on insider trading instead of the exchanges/founding company/teams. this guy is the low hanging fruit.
The SEC has just identified all of these as securities: AMP, RLY, DDX, XYO, RGT, LCX, POWR, DFX, KROM. Not sure why they aren’t dumping hard but you might want to look into it if you on a large amount of any of them.
The guy behind this cryptocurrency, Olof Gustafsson, is linked to various scams in the past. He sold Samsung Galaxy Fold phones covered in gold tin foil with Escobar Inc branding, but only delivered phones to influencers. Other paying customers [only received a book](https://www.pcmag.com/news/please-stop-buying-the-foldable-phone-from-pablo-escobars-brother) about Pablo Escobar's brother Roberto. This is not his first cryptocurrency launch either. Some years ago he raised money in an ICO for a cryptocurrency called dietBitcoin. The project was quickly abandoned and after he managed to get the currency listed on Cointiger. The platform [announced compensation](https://cointiger.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/360020346714-CoinTiger-Announcement-on-DDX-Compensation) for some customers who traded dietBitcoin on the site. This project is currently not listed on any trading platform. It's only sold on his own website and if you make an order you are instructed to make wire transfers to private bank accounts belonging to his wife and his father. I honestly think it's a shame that there hasn't been any real legal consequences so far.
Who knows why DDX pumped like it did? It makes NO SENSE, there is NO NEWS ANYWHERE Nothing on their Twitter NOTHING!!! WHY DID THIS TOKEN INCREASE SO MUCH? Are there some Secret Crypto News Outlets that I dont know about? WHAT THE F HAPPENED? SOMEONE EXPLAIN WHY?
I'm watching some YouTube stream and a guy says "check out DDX, been looking at for a while" Shit pumped 300% in a matter of hours - are these paid Telegram groups just pumping it or are they really onto something
Anyone have an opinion on when DDX will stop climbing?
DerivaDao (DDX) and Braintrust
I’ve had my eyes on DDX and RAD for this reason
Just bought DDX and Jasmy on Coinbase. Can I retire next year or the year after??
Here’s my low market cap moon shot coins. - ACH - DDX - Jasmy - Ankr - GTC
It would be mighty nice if DDX could keep doing the MATIC in April shit
DDX to the moon! What is Deriva DAO ????
DDX is just not going to stop, the price when it gets to SNX's market cap is gonna be 35$
Everyone talking about a dip and I'm just here staring at this new DDX bag thinking why didn't I get more
Everyone talking about a dip and I'm just here staring at this new DDX bag thinking why didn't I get more
COTI, WOO, BZRX, FTM, DDX and RAD. Feel like you woke up in a parallel Earth yet?
My DDX bag saving my Ass today
My DDX trades aging well, let's hope it last
I've been buying DDX for no rhythm or reason
Not gonna front, I pretty quickly sold the keep I bought today and got more DDX. It's an mcap thing
And with that my final DDX purchase of the day is filled, I'm loging out of the ol exchange. Fucking beautiful DCA day
Took some of my CGLD and REN profits into my DDX and XYO starter positions. No rhythm or reason, just because I wanted to
I've picked up some FORTH, UNI and DDX, as well as some SHIB because 69
DDX, it might be related to Dance Dance but I definitely own it
Still holding MATIC, UMA, STRM, SHIB, DDX, and KNC. Buncha shit coins and alts. I have some cash on the sides if the market keeps tumbling, though. Also, I’m not spouting propaganda. The mammoth run earlier this year was a pure pump and dump, and the bounce from the July lows was a failed attempt at getting back to those levels.
That’s helpful, thank you. I’m eyeing DDX right now for a few reasons: small market cap, low circulation, and it’s been beaten down hard since it began trading on CBP on August 31st. It looks like the sell offs are becoming less and less severe and almost looks to be settling (see photo in link).[DDX chart](https://imgur.com/a/6WvtwSm)
Not good at TA. What’s a good sign a base is forming? Looking at some of the newly listed Coinbase tokens, like DDX, which have come down a ton since their initial listing a few weeks ago.
Asked this earlier, but figured I’d try again. Anyone have any insights into DerivaDex (DDX)?
tldr; Coinbase has added support for Horizen (ZEN), an interoperable blockchain ecosystem. The crypto asset is trading at $94.46 at time of writing and is up nearly 8% on the week. ZEN is the latest altcoin to be listed by the exchange, which is also adding support for Rari Governance Token (RGT) and DerivaDAO (DDX). *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.*
Tokens always get pumped right before Binance or Coinbase even announce the listing. There is a VERY LARGE volume of insider trading happening today. This is so balant that you can almost predict which token will be listed next based on these insider pumps. If a mid cap token is up 120% in a day with no news, it's CEX listing announcement is imminent. DDX, XYO, GALA or almost any other token follows the same tradition trend.
Don’t know much about it, but DDX is now tradable on Coinbase and and a market cap of just $162 million
Anyone familiar with DDX (DerivaDex)? It was added to Coinbase on August 31st and has plummeted since then. Made a very small bet on it a couple of days at $6.86, and it’s still sinking. Has a small market cap of only $161.5m and a circulating supply of 26.1m.
Taking starter positions in XYO and DDX. 50+ bags isn't gonna happen sitting around waiting
What’s everyone’s take on BAND, UNI, SUSHI, and DDX? Also contemplating making an allocation to ADA, but nervous to do so after how much it’s already ran
All 5 coins in the ‘New on CoinBase’ section are tradable on Pro: RAD, XYO, DDX, RGT, and YFII
Any DDX shills. Would love to here others opinions on it, seems like a clean time to start a starter position
DDX and IOTX look like they're on sale
Any quality DDX shills, would love to here someone's opinion on it!
I'd like to be shilled on DDX if possible
@DDX - Holy low volume Batman…
https://youtu.be/DDX6xaPzQlE
https://youtu.be/DDX6xaPzQlE
https://youtu.be/DDX6xaPzQlE