Reddit Posts
Whatever Happened to those Environment Tokens From the last Bull Run?
6 Ethereum Altcoins Targeted By SEC Ahead of Coinbase Wells Notice
The future of ETH POW: POWR UP | Virtual ETH mining backed by a $6M LP Pool
Quit being a crypto degen gambler thinking you're an "investor." Learn the difference.
alot of people say "long term hold" or "10 year hold"...but how many actually mean it?
What are the most unique use cases for crypto outside of blockchain platforms, defi, and NFTs — here are a few finds, add your own.
Is it wrong to invest in a project that you KNOW is a scam?
What is the story with POWR? It is up ~75% today
Bought an Alt without knowing shit about it.
Mentions
POWR was a pretty cool idea that might have had a chance. Not sure why it never took off, or perhaps that the cost of it was overinflated from the start.
I had POWR on my list and should have got in on it what even happened with that price
i usually keep an eye on liquidations on coinglass, and it feels kinda ominous that POWR and PEOPLE have been popping up a lot lately. Maybe folks are converting POWR to the PEOPLE
But POWR is supposed to tokenise this power grid!? How could you sell such a promise
Bought POWR in 2017, held it in a non custodial wallet, forgot where I put the seed phrase, found the notepad where I wrote it down, regained access to the wallet a few days ago and I woke up to the token pumping 60% since yesterday. I don't remember how much I bought my bag for but I'm in quite a bit of profit so, I think it's time to sell.
“Currency” is in the name, after all. Barely anyone would care about this esoteric tech if there wasn’t a financial imperative. I used to think I was only motivated by blockchain tech. I was inspired by a technology that mimicked nature at a fundamental level. The implications of POWR blew my mind. Patientory showed a new way for healthcare to operate when the everyone knows how inefficient it is. It took me years to realize that underneath all of that awe was greed. That I’d found something that could change the system, AND, because I was early, I could profit from it. I stopped judging myself for that. People can have multiple motivations. Curiousity and a hope/dream for financial freedom can coexist. I’m sure that’s true for you, too. The number of hours I spend reading about crypto drops to 0 without the financial incentive.
POWR is interesting I think
How does everyone feel about POWR?
Not me. I'm never that lucky. I buy stuff like ALGO and POWR.
I really like PowerLedger (POWR) Not that it pays off as an investment, but it uses blockchain in a nice way.
POWR - A project with real world use that has multiple up and running projects helping people decentralize renewable power distribution. I still have my fingers crossed for this one to make a comeback, took a hit recently as it's on the SEC securities list
Happening off shore doesn't mean it's not a security if you're selling to US investors. POWR is an Australian company and was one of the first in the SECs sights
I remember buying that in 2017 when it was the next best thing Along with POWR
AMP, POWR, ACH, BLD. I'm going for Lambo.
I bought POWR about a year ago. I think $25 was the investment. A few days later I have $6,000 on that account line. I was confused. Tried to move it to another wallet and the transaction wouldn’t go through. An hour or so later I got an email from Coinbase notifying of a transaction error. Evidently they had f’d up something big time. Took a few days and I went from $6,000 to $20.
In late 2017/early 2018 I used the profits from investing into btc and other alts (like POWR and Raiblocks aka nano) to travel to Nepal and went to Mt Everest base camp. Then I went to Madrid and lived for 8 weeks before returning to work. Recently I made some minor profits by investing in a diversified portfolio including some AI coins, and I sold them to buy a car. I’ll now build up my portfolio again.
Power ledger brings back memories. Using crypto as an arbitrage tool for the energy sector is an innovative concept. Bitcoin and PoW is more ideally suited but POWR was definitely on to something.
I got in on the POWR ICO so I'm in the black, but I'd be better off financially if I'd left it as ETH. Still, I love the POWR project and the work Powerledger is doing on peer-to-peer energy trading and funding microgrid infrastructure.
FUN hits hard You forgot POWR to
I doubt it POWR was the next big thing because of Elon and look at it now
POWR is standing by the light switch demanding POWR
Couple of hundred in BTC,ETH,XRP,POWR,FUN way back when
POWR is just trying to keep the lights on. ANT is the guy trying to get people together to play drinking games but doesn’t have any cups.
The nine tokens they are talking about are: AMP, RLY, DDX, XYO, RGT, LCX, POWR, DFX and KROM. Had to dig through the lawyers arguments to find this.
Oh boy do I have some goods for you: • EOS • NEO • ICX • ARK • REQ • POWR • HOT • FUN • OMG • NANO
POWR, especially when the Australian government granted them a million dollars allegedly.
POWR. I shouldn't, but I love that coin
Most tokens are ass. very few have actual utility except for the monetary exchange of value. Another class of altcoins are "utility tokens". These have more relevance but are subject to the adoption of their platform by end users t justify their prices in the future. examples would be Holochain {HOT} and Powerledger {POWR}. Alts in general are just cash grabs.
POWR FUN They where meant to be the next big things
tldr; The Securities and Exchange Commission has listed nine crypto tokens as unregistered securities. The tokens are AMP, Rally, Rally (RLY), DerivaDEX (DDX), XYO, Rari Governance Token (RGT), LCX, Powerledger (POWR), DFX, and Kromatika (KROM). The first seven are listed on Coinbase for trading. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.*
Don't like that they switched to Solana Plus I feel EWT is somewhat broader than POWR
I was meant to remove ICP which iv done now. But whats wrong with POWR? They seem to be doing something that no-one else in the space is succeeding with?
ICP 🤣 POWR lol This list sucks
Lol what isn't 90% down? I don't think I really have any tokens "I believe in" just ones that it seems to me will generate long term value as smart contract systems and web3 sees more adoption. Feeling like I need to reassess my PRO, POWR, and HNT tokens though. Especially Helium (HNT). Might be a "people powered network" but now I'm having my doubts about whether it's a people controlled and maintained network. Core components of the network have recently been centralized so it's beginning to just look more like a telecom that crowdsourced deployment of network infrastructure. Starting to feel like a bait and switch in terms of what the network actually is, who controls it, and whether or not it can be forked away from the core team should the community decide they're not the best stewards of the network.
Surprised to see so many coins here that are far from dead, for example LSK, NANO, IOTA, ICX, NEO and POWR. I mean they might not be doing so great in terms of price but they are definitely not dead when you look at their development, community and exchange listings. Opposite even, some of them are very active and have even gained new big exchange listings last months. Anyways one of my old fallen darlings is XEM/XYM.. looked so promising. I've held a sizable portion since 2017 and it's recent death still confuses me. Weird too since it's really hard to find any information about it.
tldr; The Securities and Exchange Commission has listed nine crypto tokens as unregistered securities. The tokens are AMP, Rally, Rally (RLY), DerivaDEX (DDX), XYO, Rari Governance Token (RGT), LCX, Powerledger (POWR), DFX, and Kromatika (KROM). The first seven are listed on Coinbase for trading. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.*
I see what your saying. Energy FUD will cause a hype cycle for energy coins. Like EWT and POWR
AMP, RLY, DDX, XYO, RGT, LCX, POWR, DFX and KROM). Not sure if thats what you mean but i read your statement as the reverse
Here are the 9 tokens which the article fails to mention: * AMP * RLY * DDX * XYO * RGT * LCX * POWR * DFX * KROM
>But explain to me how a XRP co-founder cashing out over 3 billion someone selling an asset is not a part of the howey test nor is it relevant. >and people buying expecting the price to increase isn't a security? There is no investment contract because there is no common enterprise. "In order to satisfy the “common enterprise” aspect of the Howey test, federal courts require that there be either “horizontal commonality” or “vertical commonality.” See Revak v. SEC Realty Corp" and ""(discussing horizontal commonality as “the tying of each individual investor’s fortunes to the fortunes of the other investors by the pooling of assets, usually combined with the pro-rata distribution of profits” and two variants of vertical commonality, which focus “on the relationship between the promoter and the body of investors”)" The problem in these cases the SEC is trying to stretch the definition in every way possible hoping something eventually sticks. "The Commission, on the other hand, does not require vertical or horizontal commonality per se, nor does it view a “common enterprise” as a distinct element of the term “investment contract.” -Source https://www.sec.gov/files/dlt-framework.pdf The SEC is choosing to ignore the supreme court because it cant give a detailed explanation nor can they connect what does or doesnt constitute the common enterprise which is required for there to be an investment contract. In the LBRY case they are trying to claim https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FUlgX1rVUAAtow8?format=jpg&name=900x900 Which basically saying, anything that could possibly appreciate and be traded in a secondary market becomes an investment contract. which is insane. In the Ripple case they are arguing that they dont need vertical or horizontal commonality to have an investment contract. Which is also insane and now this recent Wire fraud / Insider trading scandal with (AMP, RLY, DDX, XYO, RGT, LCX, POWR, DFX, KROM). . They are now stating these are securities A: they dont have the power to do B: In some of the cases they dont have the jurisdiction to take them to court to even determine their status (LCX is based in Lichtenstein not USA) C: They havnt named any of those founders nor companies as defendants, so they cant defend themselves over their status. D: They will use this as grounds and precedent to go after any exchange that listed these tokens in the USA. The SEC is trying Any and every possible way to try and gain power over the Crypto space. and so far thanks to Ripple in part as well as hopefully LBRY, they wont get it. next up to defend the entire space tho is a guy who committed wire fraud and insider trading. He doesnt have the capital to have 9 mini trials to determine the status of each of these assets, nor to defend coinbase (who wont get to defend themselves) He'll most likely take a plea deal with includes him having to admit they are securities and he knew they always have been / were.
With only a quick look and basic understanding this appears to be a good thing for the space as a whole, and in some ways it is. Once you dig deeper tough, the problem is that there are multiple horrible legal precedents that the SEC is trying to sneak into this case which is supposed to only be about the issue of insider trading/wire fraud **Issue #1** The first is that the SEC is stating that 9 Assets are unregistered securities in this case (AMP, RLY, DDX, XYO, RGT, LCX, POWR, DFX, KROM). The SEC is not just accusing the defendants of breaking the law. The SEC is accusing 10 unrelated, uncharged companies of breaking the law (9 assets and 1 exchange) Not only does the SEC not have the power to this, they dont give detailed legal analysis as to how they came to this conclusion. I posted this yesterday but the SEC is using the same shady tactics it is using in the LBRY and Ripple case in an attempt to regulate by enforcement and expand its power. In order for something to be a security one of the 4 prongs of the howey test is that there is an Investment contract. The supreme court has ruled that there must be a Common Enterprise in order for there to be an investment contract. >"In order to satisfy the “common enterprise” aspect of the Howey test, federal courts require that there be either “horizontal commonality” or “vertical commonality.” See Revak v. SEC Realty Corp" to explain further >"(discussing horizontal commonality as “the tying of each individual investor’s fortunes to the fortunes of the other investors by the pooling of assets, usually combined with the pro-rata distribution of profits” and two variants of vertical commonality, which focus “on the relationship between the promoter and the body of investors”)" and what does the SEC's do with this information? Well in their own words though they have stated that it doesnt matter and are ignoring this requirement. >"The Commission, on the other hand, does not require vertical or horizontal commonality per se, nor does it view a “common enterprise” as a distinct element of the term “investment contract.” -Source https://www.sec.gov/files/dlt-framework.pdf The SEC is choosing to ignore the supreme court because it cant give a detailed explanation nor can they connect what does or doesnt constitute the common enterprise which is required for there to be an investment contract. In fact, One of the assets they listed as a security (LCX) Isnt even founded in the USA, Its from Liechtenstein. This means the SEC has no grounds nor jurisdiction to take LCX to court (which would be required to make it a security) This case is going to end up needing 9 mini trials to determine the status of each of these assets and the defendants/issuers will not get to have their day in court to defend their status because they aren't named defendants by the SEC. **Issue #2** They arent going after the issuers, nor the exchange which apparently traded these "illegal securities offerings" Instead they go after a single person and his family for multiple reasons. 1. The guy is not going to have the capital to fight this because he will have to argue how and why all 9 of these assets failed to register as digital asset security's and how one exchange was operating and unregistered national securities exchange. (not gonna happen) 2. Hes going to therefore have to accept a plea deal and admit to whatever they want (including that these assets are securities and he knew they were the whole time) 3. This case will be used as the legal precedent to start going after exchanges (many of these assets are listed on other exchanges in the US) now exchanges have to either Delist the assets or face possible SEC action against them (we saw what happened when all the US exchanges de-risked by delisting XRP), it is going to cause turmoil, big fucking dips and could prolong a bear market maybe even indefinitely. Since the SEC didnt name any of the exchanges nor issuers of tokens as defendants, they wont be allowed to defend themselves in court. This is regulation by enforcement via a shady backdoor. a Commissioner of the CFTC came out yesterday and released a statement clashing with the SEC and their regulation by enforcement tactics https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/SpeechesTestimony/phamstatement072122 to clarify, I'm not trying to pass over/ignore the insider trading or fraud allegations in any way. If the allegations are true, the defendants should be held accountable for their actions/decisions. But we need to & should condemn both the defendants' alleged conduct & the SEC's unjust tactics as well.
TLDR: Coinbase has listed Te Flexa Network’s AMP, Rally Network (RLY), DerivaDEX (DDX), XYO, Rari Governance Token (RGT), and Lichenstein Cryptoasset Exchange (LCX). Others are Power Ledger (POWR), DFX Finance (DFX), and Kromatilka (KROM). SEC believes these to be securities and therefore CB “100% disagrees with the SEC’s decision to file these securities fraud charges".
POWR was supposed to be huge in 2018.
At #1 I'm going ION, at #2 I'm going QNT, at #3 I'm going ATOM, at #4 I've got EWT/POWR, at #5 we going AVAX, I'm flex-a-ing at #6 with AMP, and coming in tried and true at #7 we got BTC. ^Disclaimer: the numbers were simply fun to use and should not be used as an indication of how valuable I perceive an asset to be. Furthermore, it should not be assumed I own all or any of these tokens simply because I suggested them.^
The wrong POWR survived I guess
“The assets were: AMP, RLY, DDX, XYO, RGT, LCX, POWR, DFX, KROM. They were each mentioned in connection with alleged insider trading.”
POWR is POWR Rangers isn't.
There actually alleging 9 other crypto as securities those of which are : AMP, RLY, DDX, XYO, RGT, LCX, POWR, DFX, KROM.
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2022/comp-pr2022-127.pdf >24\. A digital token or crypto asset is a crypto asset security if it meets the definition of a security, which the Securities Act defines to include “investment contract,” i.e., if it constitutes an investment of money, in a common enterprise, with a reasonable expectation of profit derived from the efforts of others. As described in greater detail below, during the relevant period, Ishan provided material, nonpublic information about, and Nikhil and Ramani traded in, **at least nine crypto asset securities that meet this definition**. The SEC says AMP, RLY, DDX, XYO, RGT, LCX, POWR, DFX, and KROM are all securities.
POWR :’-( wanted to see that take off. Or something like it.
the SEC is alleging that there were 9 digital assets that are securities, but they dont explain their analysis for even one. They also dont sue/go after the exchange where it was traded or the issuers of the tokens AKA The people with the resources to fight back, they simply went after a guy and his family. This is quite interesting since the 9 assets in question (AMP, RLY, DDX, XYO, RGT, LCX, POWR, DFX, KROM.) would each require their own smaller trial in order to be considered a security. I find it hilarious that are now focusing on insider trading instead of the exchanges/founding company/teams. this guy is the low hanging fruit.
The SEC has just identified all of these as securities: AMP, RLY, DDX, XYO, RGT, LCX, POWR, DFX, KROM. Not sure why they aren’t dumping hard but you might want to look into it if you on a large amount of any of them.
Have a look at the token POWR . It's basically used for power monitoring/ credits. Lot more to it than that obviously but its outlined on their website. My state government in Australia has set up a few sites trialling this. The company has also set up other sites around the globe . Some big partnerships are being formed
Solana seems like a great choice in retrospective, lol Sold POWR the moment they announced the migration
I gotta ask you and everyone else that's "investing" in this space - if you look at something and see it has no real world value then why on earth are you putting your money into that crypto project? There's plenty of projects that are creating real world value or have the potential to create real world value. XYO, Propy, HNT, POWR, Audius, THETA, plenty of legitimate DeFi projects, smart contract platforms like ADA, ETH, DOT, AVAX, etc. But the crypto space is completely open for anyone to build ANYTHING on including garbage and scams. Shib, Doge, Hex, and failed experiments like LUNA and UST. If you're looking at your "investment" and think to yourself the only way I can make money is dependent on someone else being a 'bag holder' at a higher price then you're all invested and looking at all the wrong things in this space. It's like you're looking at the telephone and thinking its bad because it can be used for scams or garbage spam calls, the Internet is bad because the same reasons. If you're all putting money into 'projects' in this space but cannot come up with any reasons how the project will create real world value and how that value will accrue to it's token then you probably shouldn't be in this space because you're just going to fall for garbage, junk, and scams. I gotta reiterate too this space is permissionless and censorship resistant so there will always be plenty of garbage, junk, and scams to go around. Technologies are double edged swords like that. Combustion can be used to create engines, trains, cars, and aircraft. It can also just create very large explosions. Unless you're just gambling don't put money into anything having to do with crypto unless you can answer two very basic questions - does this project create value? Does that value accrue to the token? If you can't do that and you find yourself in zero sum games losing money then you need to be looking in the mirror and nowhere else.
I was a year too late. But then again, I did trade some ETH for POWR and FUN in 2017 🤦♂️
Oooo POWR and FUN. They were a mistake 😔. Such an idiot back the and traded ETH for both of those.
Yes, but along with LTC, VeChain, NEO, IOTA, POWR, Ripple
Anybody in to Powerledger (POWR)? I love the idea
People still don't understand that every coin is a shitcoin except BTC and Ethereum, and a couple others maybe ChainLink, VET and COSMOS are real. But this NEO was pumping around in 2017. just like many others. None of them are heard of anymore. Just like IOTA, VERGE, POWR, so many coins from 2017 which were supposed to be the next big thing. Same goes for the bullrun before that, and even this one now. ALts are literally made by people who want to cash out their coins for more BTC. You should be doing the same, not thinking that altcoins are the future. They are not.
2017 called and wants ita POWR back
We’re thrilled to announce that Kraken now supports Convex Finance (CVX), Frax Share (FXS), Multichain (MULTI), Powerledger (POWR), PlayDapp (PLA), Quant (QNT), Rubic (RBC), SuperRare (RARE) and Tokemak (TOKE)! ​ https://status.kraken.com/incidents/4mybnp6ljkwd
Almost to many to list! CRO, POWR, TRAC, CTSI…
Ooo damn, I'm in this post and it hurts. Back in 2017 when I initially invested I put money into POWR and FUN. Let's just say jt didn't plan our when I looked in November 2021
Post is by: Novel-Counter-8093 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoCurrency/comments/t9pvx8/alot_of_people_say_long_term_hold_or_10_year/ with BTC and ETH as the exception, lets travel back to 2017: the year of GNT, Funfair, District0x, PowerLedger, Funfair, Mirocana, Potcoin, Litecoin, Neo, OmiseGo, Augur, SALT, etc. just to name a few. Well let me ask, how many of you are still holding onto these, waiting for the big "pump", considering its only been 5 (long) years? And now how many of you have sold these off long ago after seeing they have done nothing but stagnate? remember how PowerLedger was backed by Elon? dont tell me there is still some of you out there still hoping POWR will hit $10 a piece. Remember how Mirocana was supposed to be this revolutionary AI trading bot, and now its gone? Coins like Monero, LTC, XLM, XPR, sure, they survived, but they have been stagnant since. How many of you actually have the patiencr to sit through that seemingly endless stagnation? *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoCurrency) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Post is by: bkcrypt0 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoCurrency/comments/sy0co9/what_are_the_most_unique_use_cases_for_crypto/ At some point the crypto market will be saturated with core blockchain platforms, NFT marketplaces, metaverses, and defi. I've been looking for more unique use cases that might, over the longer term, become sustainable businesses with real revenue outside of these market sectors. Here are a few intriguing ones. **Telecom** \- **Helium (HNT)** is building out a telecom network made up of individually-owned hotspots. The bandwidth doesn't carry a lot of data, but is being used by bicycle rental companies to track location and other internet-of-everything types of usage. They just secured a major round of funding to expand. Downside -- hotspots will eventually be saturated and returns won't be that great, but the network appears to be gaining serious traction. **Advertising** \- **Verasity (VRA)** has a proof-of-view technology that rewards ad viewers with a revenue share from what they charge advertisers. The companies that pay to advertise get view data authenticated by the blockchain. **Real Estate** \- **Propy (PRO)** is a fractional property ownership firm that utilizes its tokens and smart contracts. It provides enhanced liquidity for investors and transparency. **Energy - Powerledger (POWR)** \- according to CMC "Powerledger (POWR) is a technology company that builds software for distributed and decentralised energy markets for a sustainable future. It has developed a blockchain-based platform that enables the tracking and trading of energy, flexibility services and environmental commodities." They say they have over 30 client in 11 countries. As always, do your own deep dives. There are plenty of good ideas out there. The trick is execution and commercial traction. Happy hunting . . . \* Full disclosure: I have a very small holding of VRA and don't currently own any of the others. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoCurrency) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Definitely POWR. A token for energy credits. They’ve been expanding their infrastructure ever since the 2018 bear market, and coinbase recently listed them to make the token more available to retail.
Aren’t there a bunch of currencies like POWR and ANKR they’re tied to the energy and utilities sectors? Sounds like it might be a good time to get into those
POWR? What year is it?
Timothy Ruth says he isn't concerned about the current crypto market slump and the drops in prices. He's focused on nailing down projects that have strong fundamentals and remain undervalued. He's been investing in stocks since 2007. But after witnessing bitcoin's explosive growth, he took a serious interest in the crypto market in 2019. And while the sector is far more volatile than the traditional equities market, he says the charts are just as predictable. Ruth attended the Naval Academy, where he graduated with a degree in quantitative economics. While there, he learned technical analysis from a professor who was also a successful trader. He's also focused on trading in bear markets, a skill he realized was important after he got wrecked in the 2008 stock-market crash. Today he trades cryptos while sharing his knowledge of technical analysis with his followers on social-media platforms like TikTok and YouTube, where he's known as CryptoWeatherMan. One of his key focuses is identifying early crypto projects and getting in on the ground floor. In a previous interview with Insider, Ruth explained that picking projects that could see up to 30,000% price increases means finding them before they're widely known. This involves identifying key industries that blockchain technology could provide solutions for. He looks at factors such as the infrastructure bill to determine where big money might be spent. He then filters projects based on those sectors and identifies which small-cap cryptos have fundamentally strong projects and solid teams behind them. "It's definitely a scary venture," Ruth said, acknowledging that there are risks — and rewards — associated with investing in early-stage projects. He stressed the importance of spreading bets across multiple cryptos and not putting all of an individual portfolio into the asset class. Top five crypto projects below $1 that could surge in value Powerledger (POWR) is an operating system for new energy markets. It supports the tracking and trading of energy, flexibility services, and environmental commodities. Quantstamp (QSP) is a cyber security protocol that can identify vulnerabilities and exploits on blockchains and smart contracts. Parsiq (PRQ) acts as a bridge between Web2 projects and Web3. Ruth says this protocol will be in a strong position when companies look to transition to Web3. Hedera (HBAR) is a layer-one hashgraph base that allows developers to build fast and secure applications. Solve Care (SOLVE) is a protocol that intends to decentralize healthcare networks.
Doesn’t POWR already exist for this use case?
POWR, should have got rid of it at the peak of the coinbase listing. Now I’ll probably HODL to my grave.
So... FTM / NEAR / ROSE / POWR is my pick of alts for the next ride down. Could only get AVAX at the discount I wanted
POWR has an interesting roadmap ahead.
WHERE my POWR family at. I'm excited about this one tbh
I have decided to go heavy into POWR wish me luck.
I think POWR will see good growth this year
ADA - The cardano ecosystem will take off big time this year AVAX - I like the developments of this chain and the potential for competition with ETH in the future XTZ - Another L1 making in roads into NFTs and potential E-Sports/gaming, and banking usage POWR - Energy trading is huge business and will be more important in the future. Real world utility MCO2 - More companies and governments are looking for ways to become carbon neutral, this could be an avenue to accomplish that ENJ. - Gaming and metaverse. Really like the development and platform these guys are putting together GRT - Blockchain infrastructure play. Fills a role of indexing Blockchain data for research and development purposes. LINK - The need for decentralized data sources is huge. No one does it better.
"Also some of this POWR" Screams "i dont what is that, but its in the top gainers of the day, so it must be good"
You bought POWR and ATOM next to their ATH. Not so smart imho. Fine on ETH
I now own .05 of ETH and 4 Cosmos. My bag is looking nice. Also some of this POWR
Great to see POWR back on the rise
Glad I started a position in $POWR last week! Pumps are always nice but it feels good to invest in something local too.
POWR is another one, having to do with solar power. I think it's available on Coinbase now.
CKB, ANKR, NUCypher, COS, POWR.