Reddit Posts
Apple's mixed reality headset announcement sends Unity stock soaring
The Decline of Real DD on r/wallstreetbets: Where's the Substance?
QQQ v ARKK. Peak to trough... same pattern
ARKK is set to surge at least 86% in the next 1-2 years
ARKK is set to surge at least 86% in the next 1-2 years
Cathie Wood calls Nvidia stock 'overpriced' after missing 2023 rally
Motley Fool – Luck or Skill? Independently evaluating Motley Fool's performance over the last 20 years
If you ever feel bad, remember that Cathie Wood dumped NVDA in early January when it was in the $140s
Cathie Wood said NVDA valuation was ‘very high’, dumping stock at $234 in February
Cathie Wood’s ARKK Dumped Nvidia Stock Before $560 Billion Surge, you can’t make this up
2023-05-09 Wrinkle Brain Plays - In the style of a Pirate
The rise from the ashes, when the haters have already counted us down and out, is one of the most fun parts of a cycle -- savor it, says Chris Burniske, formerly head of digital assets at ARK Invest $ARKK $ARKW. Come grow with us!!! ;-) GLTA!!!
$BFLY Gaining Momentum as Cathie Wood Scoops Up 2 Million Shares for ARKK
$BFLY IS TAKING OFF AS CATHIE WOOD SCOOPS UP 2 MILLION SHARES FOR ARKK
One of my students bought ARKK and ARKW
Thought on Set and Forget yet Aggressive Taxable Portfolio?
ARKK’s collapse in 2021 vs the Dot.com bubble. Is this the bottom for ARK? Or is Cathy Wood a false prophet?
ARK invest scoops up Coinbase ($COIN) , Block ($SQ) shares for second straight day
Dow Jones Futures Fall as Deutsche Bank Shares Sell Off on Rising Default Risks
DD: Why Blackstone's acclaimed real estate fund (BREIT) only looks good due to leverage, and faces a crisis during a housing correction
Cathie Wood investors buy the dip in ARKK after an 8-week low
Cathy Wood buys 350k shares of coinbase on Thursday, right before the 10% sell off today
Opinion: The real source of ARKK’s long-term performance
A Look At The Best & Worst From February 23 Expiration
Cathie Wood Continues Coinbase Buying
I am having trouble finding a reason not to use vertical spreads instead of buying calls or puts
ARKK lol new Nasdaq is up 5% . Roku, Roblox , Shopify all firing..
Shopify, Roku earnings coming today AM. Roblox +23% now. Cathie Wood and ARKK is getting bigger!
2023-02-15 Wrinkle-brain Plays (Mathematically derived options plays)
I have news for you: Cathie says ARKK is the new NASDAQ. Nobody more crazy and delusional than Cathie Wood. What more proof you need?
Cathie Wood says that "ARKK is the new Nasdaq". 🤣🤣🤣
Cathie Wood says ARKK is "the new Nasdaq."
They’re baaaaack. Retail participation in the stock market just surpassed the GameStop days.
Cathie hails her flagship ARKK ETF as 'the new Nasdaq'
Cathie Wood Takes Victory Lap, Calling ARKK 'the New Nasdaq'
Cathie Wood Says ARKK Is ‘the New Nasdaq’
ARKK is hot today. Unbelievable recovery time! Lol
Cathie Wood Is More Bullish on TESLA than almost anyone . ARKK v the NASDAQ over the last 6 months.
For a non-shitpost. Where would you put $15k?
2023-01-23 Wrinkle-brain Plays (Mathematically derived options plays) DD
Cathie Wood’s ARKK reigns supreme amongst 12-month thematic ETF inflows
2023-01-19 Wrinkle-brain Plays (Mathematically derived options plays)
Why I think $ARKK will double from here. I'm all in
Cathie Wood Makes Whopping $12M Buy In Tesla Stock — Offloads Xpeng For 3rd Straight Day
Cathie Wood Makes Whopping $12M Buy In Tesla Stock — Offloads Xpeng For 3rd Straight Day
tax loss harvesting to buy back in: optimum (slow) 30-day market period?
ARKK has nearly exited their position in NVDA and continued to buy the dip in TSLA. Here it is, visualized. Thoughts?
Why doesn't ARKK just buy into The Anti-ARKK ETF if market sentiment is so negative for 2023
I Suspect ARK Invest and Cathy Wood of Fraud.
Long way for us be as highly regarded as ARKK investors
Cathie Wood of $ARKK bought 221,748 shares of Tesla, $TSLA, today, so did I. (10 shares) Also your predictions for 2023.
Tesla short squeeze going mainstream! Robinhood news feed link to Investor Business Daily article.
Tesla short squeeze going mainstream!
$ZIM REGARD IS BACK WITH HIS YTD PERFORMANCE AND HIS PLAYS FOR Q1/Q2 2023 $VOO will become my new $ZIM
$ZIM REGARD IS BACK WITH HIS YTD PERFORMANCE AND HIS PLAYS FOR Q1/Q2 2023
Just sold my ARKK holdings and bought a Put for TESLA
What happened to SARK over the Christmas weekend?
Down 58% on 5/9/22, decided to do the opposite, gained 287% since for a YTD gain of 20%. How? Sold $ARKK and shorted everything!
ARKK has erased all gains for the last 5 years
What are your thoughts on ARKG ETF now as a long-term play?
ARKK: "Easy come, easy go" - Cathie Wood, probably
Cathie Wood of ARK Invest bought 74,862 shares of Tesla today worth around around $11.7 million
Cathie Wood of ARK Invest bought 74,862 shares of Tesla today worth around around $11.7 million
Can someone explain why ARKK is down 60% in the past year, but SARK is only up 50%
Why do "crap" , no earnings type companies rally the most during rallies?
Why doesn’t ARKK /Cathie Wood just buy into The Anti-ARKK ETF?
Can people shorting an ETF be counted as inflows?
Massive squeeze in Unprofitable Tech. ARKK long term chart: hold my beer
2022-10-28 Better Tasting Crayons (Mathematically derived options plays)
Mentions
Index funds hurr durr. Ask the ARKK boys how theyre doing or IWM guys or for a long while SPY guys. You can have index funds and get fucked.
I have a combination of LT longs holdings, cash, covered calls and cash/margin secured puts. I'll track all 11 sectors, and welll as SPY, QQQ, IWM, ARKK, SOX, BTC, ect, see where I am performing against all of these indices at least weekly, as well as to judge the risk across my portfolio, so I can adjust if needed, with too much or too little risk.
Holy fuck ARKK needs to crash now
She charges whooping 70bp, so she's laughing all the way to bank while bunch of bagholder holding her bags. so ARKK bagholder can def benefit from this. not Cathie
QQQ is up 34% YTD. So if you started with ARKK in January you are 1% better. Now lets compare if you bought both in March 2020.
#4 top holding. https://etfs.ark-funds.com/hubfs/1_Download_Files_ETF_Website/Fact_Sheets/ARKK_Factssheet.pdf
I really feel bad for ARKK investors and Cathie Wood fans. I can't lay my hands on it, but I believe she had originally stated that it would take 5 years to really see the value of her flagship innovation fund. I guess if by "value" she meant "worse" than it worked out because it has virtually no growth over 5 years unless you got out at the peak. Has she just done that poorly or is there something else at play here?
I would love to meet the person who bought COIN at $420 and ask them how it feels to be the CEO of ARKK.
Imagine buying ARKK at the top 
OP wrote a super cringey "DD* about ARKK and how we should all buy it diamond hands because its full of rocket emoji companies.... Then wrote this wall of anger when his shit quality post was removed.
On the first bear market, Covid, many stocks like oils were destroyed. XOP (oils) dropped from 96 to 30 in 4 months., a 68% decline. In 2nd bear the most popular stocks, ala 2000 crash, were killed. ARKK is good proxy for that with Tesla etc in it. 160 to 35 in 16 months, 88% down. On the QQQ 408 to 254, 37%. I think the #1 spot to be now is in sub 5 PE oils, that are way below their average valuations of the last 60 years.
Not true. If you compare the top 25 holdings in ARKK between mid-2020 and today, three years later: 21 of the 25 stocks are different. Only TSLA, ROKU, SQ, and CRSPR remain. That's >80% turnover in holdings in 3 years.
If you cared to read, you would know that I directly own some of the constituents of her ETF, so I do have skin in the game and I do stand to benefit monetarily if my prediction comes true. On that note, I am interested in selling up 2025 pull credit spreads on ARKK on Monday market open.
I'm gonna start buying up $COIN and $ARKK.... Yeah I think it's going again next year.
I’m not saying you’re wrong. Coinbase could go to $0 if they execute poorly. What I am saying is that for Coinbase to go to $0, it has to go above $116.30 first, to fish for liquidity. This will help propel ARKK up 86% in the next 1-2 years.
You may end up being right on several things. But, the market is forward looking and all the information you’re looking at is backward looking. While I commend you on making an effort to do some research, you are driving a car looking through the rear view mirror. The only leading indicator that is reliable is price action. I’ve specifically checked the Coinbase chart for you. The bulls have gotten destroyed over the past 1-2 years, bears have made easy money. But this is set to change very soon. Anyone that is shorting at these levels is simply providing entry liquidity to the bulls at this point. There is a ton of liquidity above $87.63 and $116.30, so the market is going to go there. Coinbase may end up going to $0, but for that to happen, the institutions need a large amount of liquidity to short this thing to $0. So usually, before going to $0, stocks will make a huge violent upward move. This violent upward move, basically a liquidity grab, will help fuel ARKK’s 86% surge over the next 1-2 years (the point of this original post). I don’t claim to know what will happen afterwards, as it’s really anyone’s guess. Good luck.
It's not zero sum, you're allowed to believe what you believe at the same time that I believe what I do. I held ARKK and ARKX and lost money on both positions, and eventually sold them. >Instead of dismissing the idea that ARKK will go up, why not actually wait and see what happens? Patience, my friend. Truly nothing in my post said this at all, you're merely interpreting what I said and projecting onto me what you think I said. Now I will tell you what I think. I truly do not believe ARKK is going to go back up 86% anytime soon, maybe on a 10 year trajectory, but it's no imminent or certain thing. Btw, I was an ARKK and ARKX investor and lost money on both positions. Honestly you just sound like you're disappointed that you were left holding the bag. This is a clever story and interpretation in your post, but I just don't see any hard data that makes your thesis make sense. I'd be open to that, but I just don't see a formed argument that makes sense. Good luck, "friend".
I don’t know anything about religion and you might be completely right about some things. Instead of dismissing the idea that ARKK will go up, why not actually wait and see what happens? Patience, my friend.
Ah yes, anyone even suggesting that ARKK will go up is Cathie in disguise😂 Wonder why Cathie would choose to say this on a Reddit forum filled with people that lose money for a living, than using a real platform like CNBC?🤔🤫
I think you have a comprehension problem. I clearly said that growth stocks are below what they were pre-COVID. This was before anyone knew what COVID was. How was that a period of mania? If anything, prices were the most rational back then. Secondly, I literally told you ARKK would go up at least 86% to reflect their true value and you’re saying I haven’t told you what the true value is🤡🙈 Their true value is 86% above from today’s prices. My exact target is in the original post at the top. $84.65 in 1-2 years time.
Your first mistake is attempting to value hyper growth and early stage companies using a PE ratio. PE ratios are usually for valuing mature companies and even when using it to value mature companies, it often leads people to neglect high quality names for low quality trash. Secondly, moats are not magically bestowed at the birth of a company, they are crafted and moulded over time. There’s also this belief that you need to be a complete monopoly to make money, a theory which has been disproved by virtually every single company in existence. These small companies are perfectly capable of carving out their own niche in a fragmented market and will do just fine. Thirdly, I said that the large institutions that drive price action have closed out all their shorts. This does not mean smaller institutions and retail investors have, in fact many will still have their shorts open. Traditionally, smaller institutions and retail investors are inferior investors and are often late to the game. They would have opened their short positions at or near the bottom and they are currently wondering why ARKK hasn’t gone to $0 yet. What do you think when these shorts start getting short squeezed by the biggest of whales on Wall St? They’ll start covering in mass, fuelling the 86% surge in the next 1-2 years. So no, having a high short interest doesn’t mean the stock will stay down and in my view, will only serve to make the upward move more violent. Lastly, this is my day job. I’ve been doing this for many years. Thought I’d share some of my insights with this sub, but I’ve been met with a 98% downvote rate😂 Oh well, you guys would rather follow investing gurus than someone with inside knowledge on how markets truly work.
Your first mistake is attempting to value hyper growth and early stage companies using a PE ratio. PE ratios are usually for valuing mature companies and even when using it to value mature companies, it often leads people to neglect high quality names for low quality trash. Secondly, moats are not magically bestowed at the birth of a company, they are crafted and moulded over time. There’s also this belief that you need to be a complete monopoly to make money, a theory which has been disproved by virtually every single company in existence. These small companies are perfectly capable of carving out their own niche in a fragmented market and will do just fine. Thirdly, I said that the large institutions that drive price action have closed out all their shorts. This does not mean smaller institutions and retail investors have, in fact many will still have their shorts open. Traditionally, smaller institutions and retail investors are inferior investors and are often late to the game. They would have opened their short positions at or near the bottom and they are currently wondering why ARKK hasn’t gone to $0 yet. What do you think when these shorts start getting short squeezed by the biggest of whales on Wall St? They’ll start covering in mass, fuelling the 86% surge in the next 1-2 years. So no, having a high short interest doesn’t mean the stock will stay down and in my view, will only serve to make the upward move more violent. Lastly, this is my day job. I’ve been doing this for many years. Thought I’d share some of my insights with this sub, but I’ve been met with a 98% downvote rate😂 Oh well, you guys would rather follow investing gurus than someone with inside knowledge on how markets truly work.
Markets tend to move 6-12 months ahead of the economy and in my prediction, I did give it a 1-2 year timeframe. When the bull market arrives, but got beaten down the most will surge the most. My technical analysis indicates that ARKK has at least 86% upside, if not more.
This. I can only see five companies from ARKK that I would actually invest in: DNA, BEAM, TXG, TWST, VERV
\> Most stocks in ARKK have been dramatically oversold, many are now below their pandemic lows despite generating significantly more revenue and free cash flow Is this true? Roku, Coinbase, DraftKings, Exact Sciences, Shopify, Crispr all have negative FCF. Square's is positive, but down from where it was pre-pandemic. Revenue is higher for most, but most are also diluting the hell out of their shares, so the per shares rates sometimes tell a different story.
I agree with OP. ARKK is beaten down I don’t like her picks as they seem old now Shop zoom draftkimgs Roku. Not exactly cutting edge anymore but it seems very likely ARKK will have it’s day again. Sure seems bottoming out now imo
>Most stocks in ARKK have been dramatically oversold, many are now below their pandemic lows despite generating significantly more revenue and free cash flow. Centuries later, tulip bulbs still cost less than the mania prices. >The reversion of these stocks to their true value will drive ARKK up 86% in the next 1-2 years. You have done exactly nothing to suggest what their "true values" are.
I agree most TA is BS, but this is how TA should be done. Price action applies to all stocks and ETFs alike, because price action represents institutional behaviour, which does not vary from stock to stock. Most stocks in ARKK have been dramatically oversold, many are now below their pandemic lows despite generating significantly more revenue and free cash flow. The reversion of these stocks to their true value will drive ARKK up 86% in the next 1-2 years.
And the "genius" of Cathie Wood has absolutely no bearing on the composition of ARKK or its positions, right?. This is idiotic. You can't apply the TA of an individual stock* to a (mis)managed fund. *TA is BS anyway.
Except ARKK is $1 and is comprised of stocks worth significantly more than $1. What’s your point? You would avoid buying something even though it will go up 86%, just because you hate it?
You might have missed the part where I said I own some of the constituents of her ETF. I stand to benefit monetarily if ARKK goes up. If ARKK goes up 86%, I will likely make significantly more than 86%
so you believe there is an 86% upside, but don't own any shares in $ARKK? You know you got top notch DD when you wont even bet on it.
True. During bull runs, garbage stocks go up significantly more than quality stocks. While I think that ARKK will surge 86%, it doesn’t necessarily mean I think those companies deserve to go up.
I don't disagree. All I'm saying is, I think ARKK has a lot of upside over the next 1-2 years. I wouldn't mind a nice 86% in 1-2 years.
I think all ARK ETFs will go up in the next few years. I only picked ARKK because it’s the most popular.
I suppose you can keep telling yourself that when ARKK goes 🚀🚀🚀 over the next 1-2 years.
ARKK is just Tesla and a bunch of literal garbage that holds it down (Roku, zoom, draftkings, etc.). Just buy Tesla
So what if ARKK goes up 86% like I predicted? You gonna stay flaccid forever?😂
Saying I have no positions is misleading as I do stand to benefit monetarily if ARKK goes up, as I own some of the constituents of the ETF. So I do have skin in the game and for the record, I’ve seen this pattern many many times before and I 100% believe that ARKK is going up at least 86% over the next 1-2 years.
I get off on watching ARKK loss porn 
That’s how you know calls will continue to print as wsb continues being bearish on ARKK. Last week $COIN was a really good long. On Thursday it rallied 6% and my return on my calls was very good! And clean price action.
This! Money is flowing back in to ARKK and I like it! My coin calls keep printing!
You're welcome to have yourself pick stocks. I'm just saying, ARKK will likely surge at least 86% in the next 1-2 years. You can't do whatever you want with that information.
Contrary to what everyone here is saying, I’m fine with ARKK at these levels.
Has is never occurred to you that human emotions swing like a pendulum? During the 2020 run up, hypergrowth stocks were likely overvalued and during 2021-2022, the market has pushed the same stocks so low that they are likely undervalued. ARKK should revert to the mean in the next 1-2 years.
Yes, I do believe this. I've seen this pattern many many times before. I don't currently own any ARKK shares, but I do own some of the hypergrowth stocks in her ETFs though. Regardless, I think people are wrongly writing off ARKK, despite their poor performance over the past 1-2 years.
Honestly, never really followed the markets back then. I didn't really get more active or paying attention to the market until 2016. That's when I bought a bunch of ARKK when I rolled over one my 401ks into a roth ira to buy a house. Since you get some tax benefits when using it for a first time home purchase and having the account for 5 years. Agreed about the labor market. I go back to covid acted as a catalyst and sped up trends that were bound to happen. We saw immigration go down since 2016 and covid led to a wave of early retirements, death and expensive childcare. I think I've been posting about that for like 6-8 months now lol. I still think it's wild people just won't acknowledge that and that it's a big reason why the labor market is tight. Kind of like a lot of inflation was transtitory in the sense of that different things were impacting the numbers, we will see the same thing to play out with CPI. I'm still bearish on the idea that consumers will travel or spend in the back half of the year, but rather hunker down and start paying down debt. Plus student loans coming back online is going to cut away like 200-300 of spending power for a lot of people.
Yeah she should. But the underlying just has to increase in value for ARKK to go up. Nothing to do with Cathy getting more money
ARKK's biggest position is Tesla, and TSLA is still oversold. Say what you will about Mr Musk but Tesla (the company) is going back to a +1 trillion valuation. They're making the Tesla Bot and on hype alone that will carry them to +1 trillion.
I'd hate to say it...because Cathie is an idiot... but I think ARKK going to go for a run the next month. (along with small caps like IWM, QQQJ) Still bag-holding a bit of ARKK, and just been waiting to cut my losses. Come on $55!
!banbet ARKK -5% 1W 
Some strength out of ARKK names pre-market: MDB +25%, $SSYS +9.8%, $DDOG +4.75%
For sure, but its one of the closest proxies we got, I kind group ARKK, XBI into those boats as well but both those are outperforming YTD. Cannabis is one of the few sectors like -20% YTD
Some coiling going on at 40 on ARKK
If you would have invested in ARKK back in 2014, you would have nearly doubled your money by now. If you would have put the same money in SPX in 2014, you would have more than doubled your money.
I keep some ARKK in my portfolio as a hedge for if the world goes regarded
Shouldn’t a tech fund be compared to a tech index of some sort? Soooo, the last five years the annual compound return of ARKK was -0.49 percent, DJUSTC returned 18.26 annually. Oooops big fucking oooops!
You did notice what ARKK has done since it's peak, right? You realize Cathie has been "dumb money" for years, right? She's like Jim Cramer only slightly less harmful. Do your own homework.
ARKK and NASDAQ aren't that comparable imo. The NASDAQ basically tracks the performance of profitable big tech companies. Where as ARKK is a fund which would be more fairly be benchmarked against unprofitable mid-cap tech since it tends not to hold many large or highly profitable companies. Although I agree, her total performance as of right now isn't great and like you I don't think much of her stock picks. I believe she was outperforming the NASDAQ by quite a margin a few years back, but I don't care enough to confirm that. Generally actively managed funds over longer periods should be expected to underperform broad market index funds, so her underperformance is no surprise. If she simply matched the performance of the S&P500 she'd be doing better than most fund managers. The "correct" way to use a fund like ARKK would be to make short to mid-term bets on speculative unprofitable tech. Anyone holding a long-term position in ARKK is allocating capital poorly.
The point is that treasuries have lower returns for lower risk. The stock market has higher returns for higher risk. ARKK is lower returns for higher risk. See the issue?
> Diversification is a real thing. Which you totally achieve by buying a small, underperforming segment of the entire market. Buying treasuries is diversification. Buying ARKK is not.
Not really. Tech stocks were destroyed only in 2022. ARKK has slightly underperformed the S&P 500 but it has *massively* underperformed the Nasdaq. Why is it underperforming a tech-heavy index? It doesn't look like the tech sector is doing badly, simply ARKK's individual picks are doing badly.
\> Don’t love all of Cathy’s picks, but they did about what you would expect during rising interest rates This is exactly my position on her recent performance honestly. Being critical of ARKKs performance over the last couple of years is as stupid as being critical of the performance of a bank fund during the GFC. It's far less that Cathie has historically picked bad growth stocks, and far more that growth stocks have been utterly destroyed the last couple of years. I'm not really sure what people want from her... Was it reasonable to expect her to pivot ARKKs strategy from speculative growth fund to defensive growth in 2021 or something? And would that even be what ARKK investors would have wanted? ARKK investors are looking for high beta speculative growth and for better or worse that's exactly what ARKK gives investors exposure to.
I'm not sure why you keep getting caught up on the whole ARKK thing. The S&P has always been the benchmark to beat for any sort of investing. If you aren't beating the S&P, you might as well invest entirely in the S&P.
I agree ARKK sucks. But not because of some irrelevant S&P comparison
Would you prefer to compare it to something more similar like the tech heavy QQQ? Because compared to that the performance of ARKK is even worse.
7% is a LONG term estimate that is often used to gauge US equity risk premium. There is nothing magical about it. ARKK hasn’t even been around 10 years. If we’re talking about how good ARKK is as opposed to another innovation tech fund then you compare it to other tech funds or at least to a tech index. If you start comparing to other investment universes then you are having a strategic asset allocation conversation which again has nothing to do with Cathie Woods specifically.
What does SPY have to do with ARKK? I think ARKK is a bad fund but comparing it to S&P is puzzling. It’s literally a tech innovation fund, do you compare EM funds and debt funds and infrastructure funds to SP500 too?
Since it’s creation ARKK has underperformed SPY by about 20%. Over the last 5 years ARKK is down 9% while SPY is up 53%.
Really says a lot about how overvalued NVDA is when even Cathy Wood won’t touch it. ARKK has a history of holding overvalued trash
A lot of world changing innovations make for poor investment categories. Buffett has eloquently made this point in relation to airlines. This is probably why ARKK is fatally flawed as an investment strategy.
ARK’s Cathie Wood Defends Missing Nvidia Rally: Tesla Is ‘Most Obvious’ AI Play https://stocks.apple.com/A-8XJ3G-xSPSeNhX1wfNxVg Talk about grapes are sour. Hahaha Cathie truly has to be one of the worst fund manager ever lmao. ARKK was Down 23% in 2021 and 67% in 2022
Cathie from ARKK on defending missing NVDA rally: "TSLA is the most obvious AI play" lmao what a cuck
Tthe $40 ceiling on ARKK is so incredibly tough to break through.
I’m usually bullish but I’m definitely selective in opening any new bullish positions given the supercharged AI rally. Lately I picked up a bunch of ARKK as a play on PLTR & TSLA
How did Cathie's ARKK innovation ETF basically just ignore AI? Presumably she does this for a living, shouldn't she have been researching this and investing in innovation, isn't she supposed to be on the cutting edge? What a disaster!
Chat GPT Version 3.0 Buys Wish Chat GPT Version 4.0 Buys ARKK
Having lost a lot in tech stocks in 2000, I cashed out put in safe heaven. Today there are 305% of what was put in. Subsequent additional investment in ibond after frustrated with stock market anemic performance gained 275% in 20 years. Total is low 6 figures. The years of deflation there was no interest or low interest (e.g. 2018). Keep in mind there were turbulent 3 years where QQQ lost -75% cumulative effect (2000-2003). I could wait for msft or Intl to return. Msft took 16 years to recover. Pentium company still struggles to this date. We had Kevin Landis First Leader etf -75% loss (yesterdays ARKK equivalent) then. The effective return is actually not much different from muni GO bond. I already possed them already alredy.
Haha I remember that pic, and ARKK was down like 70% on the year when her fan got that pic with her.
solfaucet.com can generate 1 sol in a devnet wallet. Then you can imagine it's as valuable as your ARKK holding.
\> ARKK ditched chipmaker before a 160% surge added $500 billion 