GE

EpicDOgeMC

You're conflating two claims. "Google will keep dominating" ≠ "GOOG will beat the index." The second requires the market to have *underpriced* the first. Outperformance doesn't come from a company being good, it comes from it being better than the price already assumes. If the dominance is obvious to you, it's obvious to every analyst alive and it's in the multiple. Will GOOG still exits and make lots of money? Of course. Is it worth more then analysts who also believe that are pricing it? Thats an entirely different question. And your being influenced by hindsight bias a lot. Cisco and GE looked as unstoppable in 2000 as meta and google look today. You invested in those back then, you would be screwed.

DuePomegranate

>high Schiller P/E ratio, which tends to revert to historical values No, this tendency didn't spring out from some fundamental theory. The guy invented it too early in 1988, before accounting standards were changed in the 90s, before Quantitative Easing was put in to action, before tech companies rose to the top of S&P500. Basically soon after he invented it, the long term average started to go up, and maybe the reversion should be to a linear upwards-sloping line, not a horizontal line. Looking at Mag7 and the other top companies of S&P500 today, do you think that their earnings 10 years ago should be weighted just as much as their earnings last year? Don't you think that looking 10 years back has become increasingly irrelevant? The top 10 companies in 1988 were IBM, Exxon, GE, Philip Morris, Shell, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Walmart, AT&T and Coca-Cola. It made much more sense to look at 10 years of earnings back then.

AskMoomooProduct

I say follow the money. Right now the biggest winners are the picks-and-shovels plays such as makers of key semiconductors (e.g. Micron, SK Hynix), key electrical components/infrastructure (e.g. GE Vernova, Eaton), chip designers (e.g. Broadcom, Nvidia), and so on. Essentially if your materials form difficult (or impossible) to substitute parts for the AI buildout your profits and stock have done well. The critical question is on whether this is sustainable, obviously, as jumping in now means jumping on the bandwagon/hype train. And that \_could\_ work of course, but it's far from guaranteed. I also like thinking about which companies will be most affected and are utilizing it best downstream. Think Eli Lilly or those companies making the medical devices. Eli Lilly is in similarly frothy territory, to be clear, and there are no clear answers. Pitching my book a bit I think there are further opportunities in the knowledge markets fueled by AI (see Moomoo and its clear plays on AI-driven enablement of its clients.)

thinktankdecibel

Ahh got it. Makes more sense but still going to be hard to time this stock. I see them as the next GE Vernova, but it’s going to take years before the market reaches that conclusion. 

Electrical_Regret537

All the picks and shovels have been picked up. We're retail my brother, we're always behind. Checkout GE Vernova, already ran and is main power for many centers. Veritv for cooling already ran. Most energy ETF's already ran. Any aspect of this I could think of has ran. Now obviously you can think they'll keep going, but the farther out you go from the core buildout the more risky it is. Photonics already ran a ton. There's so many angles but institutions were way ahead.

grandfatherdog

Does high oil prices kill defense stocks? GE, RTX, LMT, BA, and HON all bled today.

ValueSeeker1

Exactly what earthwormdeath said. The index has turnover — companies that stagnate get replaced by ones that grow. Enron, GE, Lucent — all once in the S&P 500, all replaced over time. You don't get that natural selection holding individual names.

ZealousidealTrip6900

The stock market is like a poker game. Everyone put their money in the chip pile. The people who are better players, the hedge funds who spend millions a year on Auto Trader programs and hyper speed internet trading are the best players. You should never do stuff like this on your own unless your ether a time traveler who knows the future outcomes or your in Trumps inner circle and know his accouchements will swing the prices one way or another. My friend did this with $500k on GE and other stocks a few years ago. He lost half the value.

Beneficial-Ad-7771

I made 2 big mistakes in the last 12 months. First mistake was I was balls deep in Micron at $155 and I averaged up when it first popped towards $200. I ended up selling most of my position and just scalped Micron for the rest of the year. If I had held my position with the short term drawdowns, I'd be up 10m+ lol. Second mistake was Planet Labs. Similar situation to Micron. Bought a ton around $12, 15, 18, 20, and averaged up. Stock hit $30 briefly in January before pulling back to like $19-20 lows. I got scared and sold for a loss. I got back in later but if I had held my original position would've been up 2m+ by the time it got to $50. I know T1 Energy will do just as well. They're in the middle of building up their G2 and once it's live, margin expansion, value adds, vertical integration, and more will be unlocked. I think by EOY base case is $15-20, bear case is $6-10, bull case is $25-30. By next year I can see this getting to $30-50 if not more depending on the amount of offtake agreements they close. What makes me hold on to this despite the drawdown is Intertek gave this an A. Less than 2% of solar manufacturing facilities got an A in 2025. It got added to state street semi index in June along with Russell 2000 and 3000. These are meaningful milestones. Lastly I don't see another company like T1 Energy at this price. If someone asked me why is T1 Energy different to all these other companies, this is my response. It's trying to become a smaller, vertically integrated U.S. energy infrastructure company, not just a solar manufacturer. If I had to explain what it does, I would say this is how T1 Energy is built up and trying to get towards. * **30% First Solar** → Domestic manufacturing. * **20% Fluence** → Battery storage and energy management. * **20% GE Vernova** → Grid and infrastructure ambitions. * **15% Bloom Energy** → Broader integrated energy solutions. * **10% Quanta Services** → Engineering and project execution. * **5% AI/data center exposure** → An end market, not the core business. This is not what T1 is today. It's what I think management is attempting to build. If management successfully executes G2, integrates KORE/NRI, expands customer relationships, and demonstrates sustained profitability, then I think investors may gradually begin valuing T1 less like a pure solar manufacturer and more like a diversified energy infrastructure platform.

Fast-Farmer-6517

GE? GE is trash. Samsung is way better.

DrumpfTheBern

How many of y’all sell a stock right before it skyrockets? Like I sold AMD the day it hit $200 back in March. HOOD and RDDT two weeks ago. GE back at $60. Anytime I sell, that’s when y’all gotta buy.

Lazy-Gene-7284

Ok story time. I was lucky enough to have a business doing well during the worst crash since the great depression (08-09). First I started doubling in in late October which was WAY too early. Waited a bit and from January on I bought more every single day. It went down for 42 straight days🤦‍♂️. I got to the point that I bought even on margin in March, but I’ll be honest with you I wanted to hide under the desk. Then, thank God, we finally hit the bottom and started to bounce at S&P 666. Thanks to some of what I did I’m now happily retired since 62 with more money than I need. But I bought some utter shit then too like Sirius / Xm , GE was no picnic either. Anyone who tells you there aren’t moments you feel like selling to turn off the pain is either lying of oblivious.

Dr-McLuvin

Ya we just got a new GE fridge and Ive not been overly pleased with the quality. The prob is it’s a built in and is not a standard size so it cost a ton. They’ve already been out to fix it twice in the first year and that’s just unacceptable.

Voenker

I reject the GE tax system.

Exotic_Possible_6680

Not at all… ask GE or AMCR or HON

Previous_Guitar5027

I bought GE in the early 2000's as my largest investment. They were a diversified company with great fundamentals and an unbreakable moat. Er. Then it collapsed. I rode it all the way down. Something to remember is strong companies can change their composition. GE sold off a lot of the stuff that made them diversified. As Employee280.... says above "I don't foresee a world in which AMZN ever has competition." Ok, hypothetical: what if they spun off their cloud business (high margin) as a separate company? Shareholders would get some stock of each but the nature of AMZN's dominance would change. Today you have companies like SPCX, GOOG, META, AMZN that are combinations of different businesses and products... but this business tactic was popular before until it wasn't.

MeowTheMixer

Not always a death sentence, depends why Honeywell just completed a reverse split after their spin off GE completed a reverse split in 2021 Both were done to adjust price/or share count to that of peers. Reverse splits done to keep the stock price above delistment levels are bad

619Hondafan

Voo ALK GE

EColli93

GE exploded afterward - and GEV

sewardpark2

MU, GE, and BX. Close fourth is GEV. BX is killing me this year.

KilaManCaro

Moderna, GE, RITM,

AmbitiousFigure1323

I believe GE had a reverse split right after the new CEO started and it performed very well after.

WinstonSalemSmith

GE though.

Alert_Win359

GE vernova earnings and ROIC are superior to Siemens

Successful_Car1670

GE the most famous example you can not only survive but soar assuming you do something drastic like break up the compqny

Frequent-Length-9966

$0.47 from GE dividend, I’m going to be stinking rich I tell yah!

Frequent-Length-9966

AVGO, AMAT, GE, GOOGL, SPCX and LIN are a few of my favorite names.

PartialDischage

The vast majority of index returns are driven by less than 5% of companies. The issue is that it is very hard to know who those 5% are over time. If you pick one in the 5% you are going to look like a genius. But it's far more likely you will pick one in the 95% that under performs the index. You mention a downturn where the index can fall 50%. You'd be right. But with an index you never have to worry about losing all of your money. Because you are diversified. With an individual stock, it could end up going bankrupt or declining massively to never recover. Look at Cisco after the Dot Com boom. Look at GE after 2008. Look at Kodak. These were massive companies that earned their stock holders tons of money for decades. Until they didn't.

Ok-Recover-7566

Pulling a GE.

defiantnoodle

Get GE Vernova too! I have both

UnObtainium17

yeah, I have sold most of my MU the day after this latest earnings. Moving the gains to DCA into LLY, GE, MELI and SCHD.

FootballRegular16

GE caught that falling knife

hopn

Welch drove the company to the ground and the two CEOs that followed didn't help until Culp took over in 2018. Now i have been following GE most of 2019 and since. I Went ALL IN bsck in May 2020. Im doing ok today.

UnObtainium17

moving a bit of gains into LLY, GE, WMT and SCHD. we out here.

w8w8dont

This theorys dum af. Boomers dont want mu. They want boomer stocks like GE and MSFT. And theres more retards here at night than market open

Neccesary

What are your guys thoughts on GE? Thinking of calls for earnings in next few weeks 

CrayComputerTech_85

I had DRIP in GE for almost 20 years. The spin-off in part just made my retirement lock in last fall. $MSFT was $20 something during the 2008 financial crisis. I didnt start DRIP on that until it broke $120. Long terms goals are long term goals. I'm buying more MSFU during this slide too.

sssiim

The narrativ doesnt change. Trump wants GE and Ford to start defensive manufacturing. These are way better positioned than major auto manufacturers. Avex 90-100 EOY

FatDunsparce

If all OSRS players buy Wendy stock maybe we get Wendy's next to the GE. Then I will finally get cooking 99

be_easy_1602

This is kind of a dumb post bro… Most actual rich people like you’re talking about don’t have the time to be “trading” or don’t want to spend their time like that. Your theory only works with people that made money though. There’s also tons of rich people that have held terrible companies into huge losses. Definitely some bag holders on Snapchat or Peloton and many more. No one brags about their losses except wallstreetbets. The key is to pick a good company with good management, but sometimes that’s really hard. And sometimes good companies go bad, look at GE’s decline, restructuring, and rise. Disney’s 10 year return is basically 0%, but it’s a company with an unmatched product. Like your whole post is “stop day trading and invest in an undervalued company!”, ok great let’s find those undervalued companies!

cuteman

>They are so far from being able to achieve that it is laughable. How many years did it take Amazon to overcome Walmart in total revenue? A feat that seemed impossible. Until it wasn't. >It would be similar to the Wright Brothers trying to claim that they could put a man on the moon right after their first successful flight, the gap is that large. How long did it take SpaceX to surpass incumbent launch costs by 2 orders of magnitude? Starship reduces cost by 3 orders of magnitude relative to incumbent aerospace companies. Furthermore how was a start up able to surpass Boeing, Raytheon, Northrup, GE, Lockheed, etc?

RichardAdams1973

I’m long on this play. I like GE Verona just expensive

Puzzled-Intern-7897

SAP has already reached 20, and I think the floor will be around 15. I won't sell my position in SAP, as I think it's a good company, even though my position is under water. These ERP companies are safe bets, as they have steady cashflows and basically hold their costumers hostage, as transition costs are super high. Imagine a firm like GE or Siemens having to migrate from their SAP solution to something that was internally created via Claude Code

Vast_Cricket

15% gain in 10 days. GE Vernova is one that I am after.

Jealous_Archer_4522

Bob Nardelli left GE and ran HD for the entire decade of the 90's and the stock stayed stuck, when the big funds finally forced him out they paid him a quarter of a BILLION dollars to buy out his contract, while shareholders made nothing (I sold when I got even after ten years). Chrysler paid him TWICE that to take them into bankruptcy.

ConKinc

GE realize that the MRI machines were too noisy so they left and started focusing on aerospace.

Separate-Extent7360

ge healthcare is the only one that's probably fairly cheap right now. Ge vernova has been talked about quite a bit among professional investors as an industrial AI adjacent play. GE Aerospace is also well known as a very dominant Jet engine/defense contractor.

drcornwallis23

Red everywhere except good ole GE and GEV which I never trade options on

StiffmeisterSteve

nice i also play osrs. trying my luck at the GE. idk i guess i thought its a leap with good delta so ill buy it. i had shares at first but i got greedy. idk…

stickman07738

Yes, it has been nice. I loaded up on GE @$6 pre-split. I was going to off-load the Power group, but very happy I did not.

Ok-Armadillo-5634

GE over the last five years 425% probably my best play I ever actually held long term.

shibbledoop

GE, obviously

SerMumble

Never forget companies like AT&T, worldcom, enron, citigroup, GE, American international group, etc. A lot of people did just sat on them forever. There is a certain level of forgetfulness and stubborness that can be really troublesome as a human gets older 👍

Nuclear_N

I matched my kids contribution about that age. We bought GE at 7 bucks, and he sold it at 30 for college. He ended up with about 30k. Now GE was in a dip for 2008. I would stick to an index ETF, and reinvest dividends.

YourChildhood5762

Children. Plenty of time to begin reinvesting when he's 20. In the meantime, he's 10 and needs an education in more than the stock market. Sally down the street thinks he's kind of cute for a boy. My dad gave me one share each of General Electric and General Motors. I grew to like the cars in the GM annual report when I was in my teens but GE was dull. Both paid me a dollar or two every quarter and that kept my interest up so I didn't sell them as soon as I turned 18 to get money to buy an Insane Clown Posse album. Of course both went bankrupt so I was left penniless. But it was the principle of the thing.

Witty_Ad_898

US policy has been dominated by an ongoing market bubble since the 70s. All those Reagan cuts to boost the economy were in part to address massive overvaluations for stocks such as GE.  The problem is the US failed to maintain regulations to prevent the markets from repeating the same bubble.  The whole thing was set to crash but the 90s tech boom infused the economy with enthusiasm and new ways to create debt in the form of capital investments, ie computing and internet infrastructure along with the educational system to create the new class of tech workers. We’ve been teetering on bubbles on top of bubbles ever since.

Frequent-Length-9966

Yeah I missed my chance with both GE’s

ericclaptonfan3

GE Vernova is one I am in also

Responsible-Meringue

GE is a poor example to use. Jack Welch squeezed that tube of toothpaste dry and didn't stop when it cried for mercy.  Not defending a conglomerate but it was an ok business prior, that probably would have still been an ok business today. Without a madman at the helm.... Shit. Elon...

ThorgoodThe3rd

Yeah trade me in the GE I’ll double your money

RightFoot0fGod

GE is really good at making things that spin. Like washing machines, or jet turbine engines, or the GAU-8 Avenger 30mm cannon. They’re real good at making things that spin.

WillTheGreat

See, Jack Welch also sold off all of GE's valuable assets to boost earnings until they didn't have any valuable assets left to make money, he didn't know he can lie about potential products and never bring them to the market to boost shareholder value.

PralineTechnical5685

Run, do not stop!! 4 Pillars of ivesting: Entry - when to buy stock Risk Mg't (protect capital - stop losses)0 Profit taking strategy - don't watch profits evaporate Exit Plan - highest you think stock will go, take $ then reinvest elsewhere Motley Fool - buy hold do not sell no matter what - dividend cut, corp illegal activity, competition instead watch asset like FMC or UPST drop 90% and still issue buys. 5 year graphs - good companies stay good what a crock of crap GE bad then $4500 invest 3 years later $60,000 INTEL 60 - 17 stayed at 20 range now $100+

Gogs85

Oh how history repeats itself. Conglomerates used to be a much bigger thing like 50 years ago. I mean if a company can do everything it’s probably a safe investment right? But it turns out that they actually got pretty shitty returns. A company that does one thing well doesn’t neccesarily do everything well. Hell GE not that long ago had to spin off a ton of business lines into separate companies because of poor performance.

xyz17j

It’ll be the new GE! Conglomerate

charliebottle

This is what everyone who buys the ketamine junky's IPO will need down the line, a reminder that your doq will love you more and stand with you through thick and thin. Enjoy the production and the carnival ride! [dooloop Hands Free Dog Poop Holder](https://www.chewy.com/dooloop-nature-called-dog-waste-bag/dp/380693?utm_source=google-product&utm_medium=organic&utm_content=dooloop&srsltid=AfmBOoqALT7j7QFzs22qNg08ROh9nAsiy-40OjgA8MsVXSNY_A8pzma29GE) https://preview.redd.it/362747hdxu6h1.jpeg?width=1123&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=89a7824de41723048991a6460b055b0bbecfd254

Bderken

GE has been a good stock to buy into…

Katjhud

GE Vernova has been reaallly good to me!

Look_its_Rob

Are you implying a business' current worth is based on the impact they have had in the past? Do you think we should buy into GE?

Fiscal_Fidel

People used to say that about GE. I'm not a Microsoft bear, I just thought the idea of its "X" company don't worry, was funny.

harrison_wintergreen

these types of posts are a little amusing. there's a vast network of professionals globally who are following every intimate detail of the copper industry and copper trading. AI won't work without electricity, so better buy GE Vernova, Siemens Energy, and Mitsubishi Power which make critical components for electric plants. In fact, better buy Duke Energy, Hydro One, China Yangtse Power and Algonquin Power that operate the power plants.

roke34442

Still not true. They have diesel generators for backup use in case of grid failures. The Abilene Stargate campus appears to use **natural-gas-fired turbines as a major on-site power source**, not diesel generators as its primary source of electricity. Crusoe installed a fleet of GE Vernova gas turbines to provide large-scale power for the campus. However, data center campuses of this size also typically have **emergency backup generators**. Recent reporting based on Texas air-permit filings claims the Abilene site includes **62 diesel backup generators totaling about 191 MW** for ride-through and emergency power if the grid or on-site generation fails. These are described as emergency units that would normally run only during outages or testing, not continuously. So the simplified answer is: **• Primary power:** Texas grid + large on-site natural gas turbines. **• Backup power:** Apparently yes, diesel emergency generators are part of the design according to permit filings.

Deathb3rry

great share. I come from BE which is tanking like crazy these two weeks, then I saw GE and it is faring even worse since the Apr22 results which should have been a popoff yet spun a major huge bear run, any idea why?

SLV_SQUEEZE

that's not really true, take a look at many stocks across different industries: \- JNJ \- JPM \- GE \- MAR / HLT \- WMT \- CAT \- CVX There have been huge winners in industrials, manufacturing, commercial goods, travel, tech, finance, etc. believing that semi conductors are the only thing driving the market is nothing more than a myth.

XorAndNot

Help me out with a thing Nvidia Intel Googl GE Anthropic Does that work?

makeammends

Interesting looking at what ended on the higher side of the day's range in my lengthy reddened watchlist. AMPH and GE were the standouts. Anyone grab those? (didn't buy them, but did pick up SIVEF on the dip -and SOXL which dipped on Me.)

Vast_Cricket

These are retired jet engines from passenger jets actually owned and operated by GE or data center users? This stuff is noisy, polluting the air while the cost of the jet engine skyrocketed. Years ago people proposed to use discarded ICBM rocket engines to generate MHD power as a way to recycle discarded weapons met with noisy, polluting chemical waste. Only USSR demonstrated that could be done having a power plant in Siberia. I suspect this will be on hold and replaced by possibly small clean nuclear power generators on trailers.

tripstermcgee808

GE is riding data center supply and outlook sentiment because that’s what they talk most about and what most people see when they think of their gas turbine or wind turbine business, but don’t forget they produce a healthy offering of critical grid infrastructure components. Namely long-lead medium and high voltage components that if you don’t secure well in advance you’re unable to energize half billion dollar projects or make much needed transmission upgrades. I’m long GE, along with a few other names in domestic and global suppliers.

dvdmovie1

"However, if the mobility division was economically attractive, " Tons of great companies have come from spin-offs where the value isn't being realized within the larger company. CEG is an example of a very successful spin-off. Look at how well GE's break up has gone for 2 out of the 3 names (and I still think GEHC is interesting.) "do it now or after the carve out?" If you think the stock broadly is very attractive now, I'd say no vs SPGI ex-mobility later that is possibly higher/less attractive.

PuzzleheadedCamel323

If this is interesting, gas has low upfront capex globally and is comparatively cheap in the US. However, its price is volatile. For a reference, check out the historic Henry Hub gas prices and compare it with the expected lifespan of a gas turbine, which is 25 years. Power plant owners will always keep this source of headache in mind when planning capacity expansion and will try to hedge and pass on the opex volatility onto the consumer (e.g. utility ot DC operator). Periods with high gas prices stifle overall demand but also boost demand for highly efficient combined cycle technology. This is more of an added insight and not really a contribution to the GE Vernova stock discussion. 

PuzzleheadedCamel323

Worked at GE's competitor for quite a few years. 1. Gas turbines were marketed as a "bridge technology" until renewables and nuclear would have picked up, creating a moderate but steady demand. Globally there is only a handful of companies that can make decent gas turbines and only 3 (3.5 if you count Ansaldo) that have combined cycle technology. The technology is the moat. 2. Data centers broke this notion because they need relatively clean power fast. Gas can provide this. The demand for turbines skyrocketed. Prices increased.  3. The whole industry underwent massive cost cutting which should be done by now. 4. The stock price increase is the reflection of 3. and 4. 5. The wind energy has low margins and low technological edge. There is no moat in wind and no room for one company to make it big. 6. Batteries are evolving fast but batteries provide power optimisation, they cannot generate electricity unless charged. I also do not see moat in batteries. My view is that GE Vernova stock will trail the AI wave. Once the momentum is gone, it will go back to the status quo before the AI (cyclical, little growth). The only possible game changer could be small-scale nuclear power.

Ornery_Cantaloupe_20

Too bad GE isn’t in the weed sector how about naming one of those lol

MatrixOrigin

We've also never seen MSOs uplist. In other sectors, there are plenty of examples of successful RS when there's a goal outside printing shares. GE for one.

Commercial_Ease8053

List of the only green stocks I follow (as of 8:45am) \- Apple \- chipotle \- Coke \- Disney \- EBay \- Leonardo \- FedEx \- GE \- Home Depot \- J&J \- JP Morgan \- Lilly \- McDonald’s \- Everpure \- Root \- United Health \- Walmart

DavidThi303

GE, Siemens, & Mitsubishi are the main manufacturers. They all have a 4 - 6 year lead time on delivering turbines. They're running their existing factories at max but GE & Siemens have said no new factories and Mitsubishi is considering a new factory but has not broken ground. If you want reliable power, and they do, it's gas, coal, or nuclear. There's no remaining rivers in the U.S. to dam for hydro. Geothermal is still in the experimental stage. And renewables are not reliable and the battery cost to make then reliable is gigantic.

ApplicationAlive1050

Is GE the only one who provides power generation for data centers? Are gas turbines the only source of generating power for data centers. The point also still stands that they aren’t slowing down production. This article says the exact opposite.

DavidThi303

[https://www.utilitydive.com/news/ge-vernova-gas-turbine-investor/807662/](https://www.utilitydive.com/news/ge-vernova-gas-turbine-investor/807662/) GE Vernova is increasing production in existing plants but not building additional capacity. Ordering a turbine today will be delivered in 2029.

TowerNo77

It might be worth investing in Honeywell the parent company that still has a 46% stake in it. The stock price is currently down following the split. It will share the profits but offloads the debt. There will be some uncertainty as they are also about to split the aviation division off too but splits like this often result in a greater upside for all divisions when the dust settles (e.g. GE Vernova). 

Highspiritz9

Why now? And why so much too? GE and Philips with much deeper pockets are also bringing out their own hand held devices as a direct competition.

aka_crashoverride

ughh sold my GE calls waaaay to early

aka_crashoverride

NBIS was a little wild. but has good interest. ASTS has too much regard hype for me. I traded GE and have been happy.

throwaway9gk0k4k569

There are two NatGas generator company IPOs happening this week. I don't want to get banned, so I'm not going to name them, but one happens today, and the other next Tuesday. The one today is an older and well-established company based out of Germany, but it's from the assets of the old GE business sold to them in 2018. Remember how Germany was getting all of their energy from Russian NatGas up until recently? Yea well. That's mentioned in the prospectus, which is worth reading. Anyway, this one is a dump on retail because they loaded the company up with debt to pay off the private holders first, then you get to buy the bags. It's a good deal if you think energy costs are going to continue to be a problem for a few more years. The other one is a newer company based out of Houston. The company was established back in 2006 or 2008? I can't remember. It was right around the fracking boom and they took advantage of cheap NatGas. This company is risker and not making a profit yet, but has explosive growth. They are the provider for Hyperion, and others. I work in tech and am familiar with their products. Both are interesting.

Any_Pomegranate1134

I think this is a beautiful damaged stock not a damaged company this is classic GE and caravan when they were still under $5. they are trying to repair their company back to a creditable company # analyst Price Targets for 2026/Next 12 Months * **Consensus**: Limited coverage (only 1–2 analysts actively covering). * **Average Price Target**: **$5.00**. * **Implied Upside**: **+125% to +150%** from current levels (\~$2.00–$2.14). * Ratings lean toward **Strong Buy** from the few analysts, but this is based on very thin coverage. * Current stock price (as of June 3-4, 2026 close): Around **$2.00 – $2.14** (highly volatile, with recent swings). * Market cap: Roughly **$40–50 million**

Rabid_Platypies

Exactly. Just look at GE’s split

T-Zing

Not doxxing myself bro, but it's a one of the biggest energy technology companies in the world, like GE Power or ABB

DeathCobro

You should read into GE Vernova $GEV

Helpful-Cut-4903

i’d probably keep both tbh. GE Aerospace feels like the safer long term hold and GEV has the more exciting AI grid/data center angle but also more risk after that run wouldn’t chase GEV here. maybe just add on pullbacks. i’ve been checking stuff like this in Finnext too mostly as a quick second opinion on forecast and news momentum before adding

UnObtainium17

I have sold out of META couple of months ago on a very little gain. Moved the money to LLY and GE on the dip. I figured if META gains a lot after I sold, I can totally live with that.

Scared-Signature-452

Great advice, thank you, but doesn't always work? GE has been a winner for me since 2024 but has stalled lately.

moorhound

Jensen don't know shit. GE Vernova is the next trillion-dollar company