GS

Nerfarean

GS level pampin

OyG5xOxGNK

When I first got into the whole GS thing I was thinking "even outside of the 'to the moon' sentiment, it *was* an undervalued stock." I had not realized though the difference between share price and company valuation/number of shares. I think it's just something not intuitive to a lot of new traders. But I thought the evaluation of SpaceX was a big thing in the news, something that should have trumped that ignorance. Who knows.

claytondpark

Yeah jpm and GS just recently hit ath that shiet needs to get dumped

Rare-ish_Birb

DJIA is controlled by financials, GS largest constituent. If it lets go, look out below.

Guilty_Rooster_6708

Any chance he’s a GS analyst in disguise?

Honest_Bruh

Because it's regarded. GS IPO'd in 1999 😂😂

horesebeblind

Financials appear ready to roll. MS, JPM, GS. Maybe some industrials FDX? Rotation is inevitable. But I can’t say when

Rare-ish_Birb

Feels toppy. Sitting on mostly cash until we get a larger correction. Won't take much if they raise rates at next FOMC 6 weeks away. Riding some weeklies puts on JPM, GS, WMT, KRE. Calls on VRTX and TMO.

Majestic-Baby-3407

Full text of Iran deal [https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/17/us/politics/us-iran-agreement-deal-text.html?unlocked\_article\_code=1.q1A.GS9m.-ees0yZiSoJv&smid=url-share](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/17/us/politics/us-iran-agreement-deal-text.html?unlocked_article_code=1.q1A.GS9m.-ees0yZiSoJv&smid=url-share)

Rare-ish_Birb

Idk, but I invited GS, MS and LPLA too.

realdeal505

I think if you got it at IPO price, it actually wasn't a bad buy. Some of the the big FIs (Morgan, GS, Everscore) think it is going to be 330-480B in revenue by 2030. At 10-15x earnings that is 3.3T to 7.2T market cap. Ironically ARK is lower on it with only 200B projected.

zxc123zxc123

You mean VOO. VT is getting SPCX allocation immediately. S&P500 will wait until it can meet the 1 year profitability requirement. At earliest summer 2027. Meanwhile VOO is heavily concentrated in GOOG/GOOGL/BRK/BAC. GOOG/BAC who bought into SPCX at a way lower price pre-pandemic. BRK who has shares in GOOG/BAC. Then JPM/BLK/GS/MS who will make money off the SPCX ipo. The real winners are those dumping the bags or making money as the middle men.

SnowTard_4711

No. The float on SPCX - as huge as it is, is something like a couple of days of what changes hands in the market daily. It’s not going to collapse the system. Even if SPCX went to zero tomorrow - the economy doesn’t end because of that alone. If - on the other hand - SPCX goes to zero because something fundamental happens, then people might take it as a sign that the broader economy is fucked. Then the market tanks - but not really because SPCX tanks - because of whatever made SPCX tank. Like 2009. The markets didn’t exactly crash because Goldman Sachs failed. They failed because people realized that the same crap that doomed GS was also happening everywhere else too and they were all hooked up. So - SpaceX doing deals with all the AI companies, who are cross-pumping the AI names, who are all doing deals with the chip manufacturing companies…. Oh shit….

AMadWalrus

So you admit you pulled the numbers out of your ass? Idk what you mean by "did valuation for a living", unless you mean you did fairness opinions? I worked at GS/MS in their top IB team so understanding how companies are valued is my bread and butter. I'm going to assume your quality of experience isn't comparable to mine because no one that is a peer of mine in terms of expertise on this topic would either describe it as "did valuation for a living" nor would they have disagreed with my original comment (thus this conversation wouldn't be happening). You should just admit you have no idea what you're talking about, because people that actually understand finance can see through your BS.

greenpride32

Investment bankers (let's say at shops such as GS JPM MS BAC etc) work on these deals - and then you've got employees at both FOX and ROKU - I'd be shocked if there weren't leaks - and that's why there always are.

insbordnat

oh please. next you're going to tell me that people from SpaceX sat on a call with the bookrunners determining how much every non-bookrunner of the tombstone got allocated, and then they had some visibility into the book this morning to see how things were shaping up and getting subscribed, and then they had the audacity to ultimately determine who got what before they closed the book, and then those allocated investors had some preference as to who they were going to allocate to based on their allocation, and that those retail brokerages (IBKR, Schwab, Etrade, etc.) didn't get their full requested allocation and filled based on their ultimate allocation. it's all a conspiracy, and investors at the rinky dink ass brokerages got the shaft while the big boys at GS, BAML, Citi, MS, WF, and JPM had some pull to allocate to their institutional clients or something ^(/s if it wasn't obvious)

HckyStrms

Oversubscribed numbers are seemingly bullshit. Deal team bankers at GS think it trades down 40% inside 30 days. MS initial value had it under a T and they got so insulted they only gave them a small portion of econs...sellside street really seems to think this is bullshit.

kuedhel

"30% revenue growth"? These are rookie numbers. MS and GS analysists predict 100x revenue growth in 2027. It is like every person in US will pay $3000 subscription fee to SpaceX service. Because they will not launch 100x satelites.

Relative_Baseball180

Put datacenters into space with a reusable rocket. The biggest issue with AI is terrestrial datacenter compute. In other words, not finding enough space nor electricity on this earth to power all the compute we need for AI. That is where the idea of putting a satellite in space with data centers being powered by the sun becomes a real thing. Its why Morgan Stanley/GS projected that Space X achieving over $3 trillion in revenue by 2040 if I recall is a possibility. They've already setup contracts with Google to do this. In addition, people will be able to rent out Grok AI inference from space using starlink.

ExplanationNormal339

Following [$GS](https://aimytrade.io/ticker/gs?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=comment&utm_campaign=RobinHoodPennyStocks&utm_term=GS&utm_content=template_1781020592975_j09wyn) for a while now. I try to look at the data before forming a view. Not advice, just.

minaminonoeru

A few major conglomerates. That’s right. Samsung – Semiconductors, Electronics Hyundai – Automobiles, Steel LG – Electronics, Batteries, Robotics SK – Semiconductors, Petrochemicals Hanwha – Defense, Aviation HD Heavy Industries – Shipbuilding Hyosung – Electrical, Machinery GS – Petrochemicals POSCO – Steel ...and other large conglomerates are leading the Korean economy. But isn’t that the case in other countries as well? *Translated with* [*DeepL.com*](https://www.deepl.com/?utm_campaign=product&utm_source=web_translator&utm_medium=web&utm_content=copy_free_translation) *(free version)*

carloo90210

Goldman Sachs (GS) when it was in $90 range and still riding it.

kuedhel

I probably should make better description. No doubt GS, JPM and VZ use AI. But they have 15 P/E and not projected to grow at 10% y-o-y. I worry about companies valued at 1T with 100x projected revenue growth that have AI business as the primary driver of this revenue growth.

kuedhel

GS projects 100x revenue growth. MS projects 1.7T revenue by 2030. Mind you, there is no people in the world who has 1.7T combined to pay for all the AI they may want. But sure. Perhaps Google will pay for [X.AI](http://X.AI) datacenters. [X.AI](http://X.AI) will use these money to pay for NVIDIA chips. NVIDIA will pay this money to Google for something else. All three will post this as revenue. or something like that.

Spac55

This week Berkshire invested $10 Billion in $GOOG for AI-expansion Berkshire total $GOOG holding~$26.6Bn It reminds by 2018,when $BRK.B push ~$36Bn stake in $AAPL Also $5Bn each stake in $BAC & $GS, when all worry for GFC $5B stake in $UNH Got $TMHC at $6.8Bn Watch $MU $AVGO possibly next

RaikouVsHaiku

If anyone reads this and is inspired to buy into the IPO just wire me the money instead because you’re retarded. “Chief Futurist at ARK” - GS predicts a 100x increase in AI revenue by 2030 when Elon is leasing compute to GOOG because no one uses Grok.

WhaleSmacker17

Perhaps because "they" (large instituional investors, GS in spacex case) are underwriting these IPOs?

imdaviddunn

1. This should be taken with a grain of salt. It is likely marketing, just the type of thing stated during roadshows, but without one, they have to ensure interest. And 30% retail, MS/GS need headlines. 2. For all of this talk of over subscription, I’ve never seen so many people on social media saying they won’t participate. But maybe it’s just what pops up for me. Maybe there are tons of people promoting buying it. 3. We will see if Elon can continue the con.

TDAdams

Great conversation guys. One idea that has worked out for me has been to buy the brokers and forget about them. GS MS JPM and IBKR Bet on the house, not the gamblers.

Ghearik

GS and MS must have industrial knee pads for all the deep throating of Elon and his "ideas". Like seriously. This is a fucking scam 100%.

Consistent_Rule101

I think this IPO will go flop with the way GS and MS are propping it.

darkrose3333

GS is underwriting and facilitating the IPO

itsnotshade

Yea it’s bizarre. I thought the Reddit IPO was a little hyped, but this one is everywhere with only institutions seeming to be excited. You have GS analysts giving revenue estimates only a total moron would believe. Looking forward to them talking about their gangbuster’s bag selling / trading revenues next earnings call.

PurpleReign123

Correct! But these companies are paying GS *bigly* IPO fees, so GS is not writing nice stuff about them. Pump *baby* ***pump***!

Particular-Macaron35

I bet GS will cancel the initial public offering and buy all the shares themselves!

Chaminade64

Well, let’s see….GS is accepting the mandate to sell the stock, Morningstar has no economics at work.

Tookerjobz

Puts on GS

Practical_March2024

[Goldman Sachs expects SpaceX’s AI revenue to increase 100-fold by 2030](https://www.ft.com/content/516cd0e5-a402-4b6c-8035-d688dc5f0cf4) I am assured now ...after all GS has assured me ..

Longjumping-Speed511

Setting aside the fact that GS has a strong vested interest in the success of this IPO, how exactly do they propose SpaceX does this?

crackpipecardozo

If this doesn't play out, could GS be on the hook for some sort of negligent misrepresentation?

EnaBoC

Buying GS I guess. They make money on the trade/flow so technically you'd win no matter which way it goes.

TheQuarrelsomeEmu

I mean aren’t these two different things? GS is saying they think revenue will increase over the next 5 years, Morningstar’s valuation is what spcx is worth right now. They’re not the same…

StockMechanic

GS expects a whole lot of retail bag holders

Sexy_Kumquat

GS can go smoke a fat one

Crazy_Donkies

You're why I only scan WSB for tickers and don't take advice. GS is the 5th largest bank in the world.

MaleficentClaim9426

GS, well done

the_deadzone

NBIS - neocloud with the NVDA cosign. Set to become the next hyperscaler. RKLB - space. Need i say anymore? MRVL - optical hardware. AI buildout over the next couple of years. GS said combined packaged optics tam will grow >5x towards 2030. Multibagger potential. Also recent NVDA cosign GOOG - fullstack AI buildout. Complete self reliance. Will dominate the mags probably

DressPrestigious7088

Everyone is talking about DELL that no one realized GS is over 1000$.

PurpleReign123

Trust the vampire squids at GS to concoct a scheme for their *clients* to screw ~~suckers~~ investors who buy into passive funds. In the long run, they will *kill the goose that lays the* ***golden eggs*** for them.

PurpleReign123

No need to stress yourself, dude. Plenty of other similar opportunities heading your way soon. If this SpaceX nefarious scheme works well, the vampire squids at GS will implement same for all incoming IPOs too including OpenAi and Anthropic. Very soon, all the passive funds will be holding 3-5% of their moneys in massively overpriced stocks they are forced to buy.

istamanti_

Also this isn't a bear market thesis, its simply a bullish energy & commodities thesis. JP GS MS are under reporting the severity of the incoming collapse because they are sell side and need to sustain consumer optimism so that they can sell Elon's bag.

MybobbyB

Mes objectifs sont simples pour moi RML a ce stade par anticipation et en comparaisons a son voisin PPTA pourrait allez chercher 700/800M$ des son introduction Nasdaq. Ce qui va la debloquer pour aler plus haut c est le JORC fin d annee et les permits validés Apres 1,5B$ ne me choquerai pas car elle a l usine deja en place et donc poeut deja recevoir des contrats Je le répète PPTA valorise 3,4B$ mais n a pas d usine. JP morgan et des Goats de l or sont in c est tout RML j aimerai que Sprott et Morgan Stanley/GS soient in ca serait top avec Barrick why not Voila tout dependra comment le marché anticipe ou pas mais 700M$ pour une miner exploratrice qui switch le developpement et passe direct en production ca fait boom Bon week end les amis

HazelCuate

did you use the FRED's GS10 series? [https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/GS10](https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/GS10)

HywayKind

JPM, XLF, GS, MS... suspiciously up

HywayKind

when there's a big flurry of put buyers, you think it doesn't pump the financial sector? look at XLF, JPM, MS, GS

ChairBorneRanger

Booster GS1-7E03 "No, It's Necessary" LULZ

RoyalFail6

GS did say we had a 50% chance of hitting 800 by EOY…if u don’t pick some calls up, u just hate free money 🤣

RandomRocketScience

All price targets are just guesstimates. We have 10M barrels a day of reduced supply, and we need to balance and Demand and Supply through price. So far SPR releases have disrupted price discovery. I cant tell you what price leads to that amount of demand destruction, but $115 a barrel was not nearly enough. Im mostly referring to estimates from JPM and GS, this is a screenshot of JPMs oil forcast. Notice how the worst case they are estimating is full opening in july, which seems implausible at this point. FT headlines a couple weeks ago were estimating $200, but I cant find them right now. https://preview.redd.it/tw0jc6zm3t3h1.jpeg?width=1224&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f265273bb929100d5579d8650edaff9a430edaf1

PurpleReign123

Vampire squids at Goldman concocted the nefarious schemes to force index-linked funds and ETFs to buy SpaceX shares shortly after IPO. If the vampires managed to convince ipo investors to hold on tight to their shares for say 15-20 days, the index funds and ETFs (or those who invested in these) are going to get royally screwed. If this is successful, GS will repeat same for the OpenAI and Anthropic IPOs too. Get out of the index funds and ETFs whilst you can. Hope the vampires’ scheme flop, and hope they get stuck with a lot of shares which quickly go underwater.

Fwellimort

Ah y es. This is the stock GS just re-rated again. What a meme. Imagine being so retarded you buy and sell by what analysts do price targets on.

OPINION_IS_UNPOPULAR

Do you think he's 1K or GS? (stolen from r/UnitedAirlines) https://preview.redd.it/t5oxq645zg3h1.jpeg?width=959&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=52a303ebff75aa3c575e1288c2904b79b300fa5b

123supreme123

Probably GS stock. If half stock won't work for Ryan Cohen for ebay, it won't work for OP with a pre-op TS hooker

Alicyclobacillus

This is how it seems to almost always go Stocks start dumping for no apparent reason Then the media makes up a headline and pretends that's the reason for the dump Then stocks dump more, some more and more for months The rally right now will end when GS, or MS, or JPM, or Saudi royalty, etc., decides it ends.

AMadWalrus

Bahahah I am GenZ actually. Also my university didn’t have a business school - most ivies don’t have one. I was also at GS/MS in one of their IB groups that all the Ivy kids cream their pants for, but now I’m fully remote making $350k a year wfh in Europe (hence the time zone). Yikes man I’ve never seen anyone wrong this many times in a day.

CrayComputerTech_85

Well...like the global stock rep from GS said on Bloomberg the other day, "its not just the US, we've been spending money like a drunken sailor on shore leave the past decade and penance is due" or some such. Out of control debt and spend is the norm...as long as it's manageable. Until it isn't. I hold the stock so.....*shrug*

claytondpark

GS ticker is so fucking manipulated, trading options on it is so difficult

clubdirthill

Did $GS pivot to manufacturing DRAM what is happening?

Apple2o

How dumb am I for loading up on MS and GS instead of mag7 or memory?

Forward_Editor_5895

As someone who owns C, BX, GS, and small positions in BA and MU, they are all down since the trip. NVDA, whose CEO also went and is my #1 position, was up for the week.

yrrag1970

Their CS is horrible and GS

clubdirthill

GS is going to make so much money dumping the SpaceX bags on retail

Ok-Clerk393

When I joined nasa back in 2016 we had to take a day long class about ethics, stocks, etc. I remember asking if holding defense contractor ETFs was allowed as a GS-7 ($50k/yr lmao). Insane to me the president can own individual stocks.

Bluesquare9

HIMS early August — peptides play… TSLA mid-July — SpaceX IPO play… GS a couple weeks — just a nice chart… P a couple weeks — earnings + run-up play… Biggest concern is TSLA honestly, and maybe GS diving.

Bluesquare9

P calls, HIMS calls, TSLA calls, GS calls

Rare-ish_Birb

CAT, and it's financier, GS, at your service.

gob_magic

Just a recommendation. Cross check numbers. I’ve had some weird experiences of both Claude and GPT missing some common sense numbers or inverting them. I use LLM mainly for formulas for Google Sheets, where all my analysis lives. Going to move all this to a IPython notebook because GS gets slow with all the formulas and manual editing.

Single-Adeptness-769

GS MS please just rip so I can close out before we have our scheduled red day tomorrow

greenpride32

No idea what is your definition of "margin", but at the brokerage it is effectively a loan and there is no such thing as cheap. Why would they give you a low rate when their money market would pay a higher rate? Places like SOFI and HOOD typically don't even give full lots on IPO allocations as they cater to lower value accounts. If you actually have capital to buy 5k shares of CBRS with no intention of flipping, not sure why you are at Fidelity instead of a private wealth account where the big IPO's are underwritten. You'd have much better chance at getting allocation. Now more seriously if you were at a GS/JPM/MS private wealth, you would never get such an allocation, not even close.

neverseengreen

NVDA TSLA AAPL BLK BX BA C GE GS MU QCOM These are the 🥭 port tickers, im gonna to throw $1k at each in my lame stock only account

Acrobatic-Song-3151

I started buying around $120, was firing a $10,000 bullet about every $10 down until I was all in. I believe it bottomed near $50 intraday, but that was almost two decades ago. I’ve never traded GS again. 

AlpacaDream7

GS 970 tmrw

thewhorecat

Sure. It was widely reported that Buffett was not only a net seller of stock leading up to the financial crisis of 2008 but years before he said he was having trouble finding attractively priced investments. As Buffett was reducing exposure he was building up tens of billions in cash and treasury bills. Stocks Buffett sold were PetroChina, which he bought cheap in the early 2000s and sold almost all of it in 2007. He sold Johnson & Johnson, Procter & Gamble, Moody's, and Anheuser-Busch shares. Now, during the financial crisis he made some sweetheart deals with that stored capital. He invested $5 billion into GS in preferred shares that paid a huge dividend (and got the kicker of warrants), GE preferred shares, $5 billion in BofA preferred shares that came with a warrant kicker (which led to him being a greater than 10% holder when he exercised those warrants at $7.14 per share). He did acquire some shares leading up the financial crises such as KO, Amex, and Burlington Northern Sante Fe, which he fully acquired in 2009. He has had a long conviction in KO and Amex. While Buffett does say he doesn't try to time the market his actions somewhat say otherwise. He tends to get very conservative during times of euphoria. If you look at today, Buffett/Berkshire has again been a net seller and now has nearly $400 billion in cash and Treasuries on the books. Berkshire has been a seller of shares in Apple, BofA, Amazon, Citi, and T-Mobile (amongst others). I don't take it that Buffett or Berkshire is expecting an imminent crash but he is again being very cautious while parts of the market are becoming euphoric. We will have to wait and see if he is right this time around.

mixtape312

Do you think the regards at GS and JS read the Daily Discussion thread?

TomatoSpecialist6879

MU in 2019 & 2020: "MU pleas fly again" MU in 2026: "Next stop the JADES-GS-z13-0, furthest galaxy from the Milky Way"

ExplanationNormal339

$11. 98 on [$GS](https://aimytrade.io/ticker/gs?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=comment&utm_campaign=RobinHoodPennyStocks&utm_term=GS&utm_content=variant_1778251476831_qtwpn) is the only level I'd care about here, since losing that probably opens the path toward $7. 49 fast.

huyou007

For me it's easy. I have noticed most of the world is winner takes all - finance: GS/MS/JPM, beverage: COKE, Search: GOOG, Cloud: AWS, Social Media: Meta, Chips: TSM。 By buying the winners of each industry, you have the best chance of continuous growth, and minimal risk that they will go belly up. I for one, have been holding GS/MS/JPM/AMZN/GOOG/META since 2015, the returns vary between 300% and 1000%, with very few nights that I lost sleep. Of course, by doing so you won't catch the stocks that goes up 30x in one year, but I am fine with that in exchanged with peace of mind.

TradeTheBones

**BABA setup is loaded and probably the best single-name China play right now.** The catalyst stack inside one week is the whole story: * Wed May 13 — BABA Q earnings * Thu-Fri May 14-15 — Trump-Xi summit * Two binaries inside 48 hours, almost no other China name has this proximity **Tape (5/7 close $141.45):** * YTD -9.18%, off Mar 30 lows +15.96% * RSI 54, neutral trend * Above SMA20/50, below SMA200 ($148.49 = key level) * Death cross still active, BB position 0.98 (extended) * Outperforming the basket: KWEB is -17% YTD, BABA -9% **Pattern engine, 4 bearish vs 1 bullish:** * descending_channel bearish 85%, target $110 * descending_channel bearish 85%, target $108 * falling_wedge bullish 85% (reversal signal) * descending_channel bearish 80%, target $128 * bear_flag bearish 80%, target $132 The bullish falling_wedge is specifically the pattern that signals downtrend exhaustion. All five simultaneously = stock at the resolution point of a 6-month bear pattern. Up resolves to $165-175 (SMA200 reclaim), down clusters $108-132 (-25%). **Barclays put a clean trade on the page this morning (Catalyst Watch 5/7):** * Buy 15-May $145 BABA calls * Reference $140.70, cost $4.10 (2.9%) * Implied earnings move 6.2% * Breakeven $149.10 Interesting wrinkle: implied 6.2% is *below* BABA's 7-9% historical earnings-week move. Option is actually cheap vs realized history *before* pricing the Trump-Xi optionality on top. **The Barclays cross-desk alignment:** their vol desk published yesterday saying Trump-Xi is being priced as a non-event by FXI/ASHR vol curves. Today their equity desk says "buy BABA calls into earnings." Two desks at one firm pointing same direction. That alignment doesn't happen often. **Three ways to play it:** * FXI 1m straddle — cheap event vol, both directions, Trump-Xi pure * BABA 5/15 $145 calls — directional, stacked binaries * ASHR 5/16 calls — cheap onshore directional, summit alone **Risks:** * Cloud/e-commerce miss on May 13 (the AMD-style "beat but miss the take-rate" equivalent) * Tariff escalation surprise (~15% probability per most desks) * Already extended into catalyst, BB 0.98 * Still below SMA200 **My take:** sized at 50bps via Barclays 5/15 $145 calls, it's a defined-risk directional play on a calendared event stack. The honest contrarian read: this all depends on Xi delivering anything. Busan was muddle-through, GS framed today as "talks-not-deal." If both binaries land in muddle-through zone, the call expires worthless and BABA drifts back to the $128-132 cluster the bearish patterns flag. The 4-vs-1 pattern count isn't a coincidence. Pass if you think KWEB underperformance signals macro weakness in China consumer/cloud. Add if you believe the binary stack is mispriced vs historical earnings-week IV expansion. Sources: Barclays Stock Catalyst Watch 7-19 May, Barclays ETF Compass 5/7, GS Basics 5/7.

BlackKnightsOptions

If you told people in GS JPM etc in 2015 that fucking commodities like chips and memory would get priced this high of a premium you'd have gotten laughed out of the firm

ChangeFatigue

eBay bought out one of the biggest tcg market places about two years ago. If GS is looking to move deeper into nerd collectibles this is a move that would consolidate a lot of it.

RSomnambulist

Their debt is more than 2x their entire Ebay holding. I don't think this pump is going to put a dent in that assuming they dump, which will put the stock into freefall because people will see it as an obvious dump. Napkin math 7% drop on 10B 6% gain on 2B (5% of 47B) This is just a bad play all around and makes Cohen look dumb and like a grifter at the same time. Not that Burry is any sort of genius, but he just pulled out of GS on this news and had a substantial holding.

Mirikado

They don’t. GameStop has less than $9B in cash from the meme stock run. TD Securities, a Canadian investment bank, is willing to loan them $20B to make it a leveraged buyout. They are proposing a $56B buyout for GameStop. Half cash, half stock ($28B each). GameStop can get the cash part with TD Securities but Idk how they can get $28B in stock offer considering their current market cap is $10B. Even the fucking GS CEO didn’t even have an answer for that lmao.

elpresidentedeljunta

They love him, because they still have GS shares from back in the day, when they bought at the top. And he´s gonna get them back there.

Noble_Bastard

I find it hilarious that RC fan boys will ride his cock into the sunset, even though he already rug pulled them once with Bed, Bath and Beyond. His biggest accomplishment at GS is having it trade within its liquid cash range. When pushed today about how he was going to fuck over shareholders again for his own personal gain, the best he could do was say "I guess we'll see what happens".

wxlverine

Nah I don't think so. He doesn't like CNBC or Sorkin, they've always just talked shit or turned every positive about GS/RC into a negative. Whether it's the accumulation of the war chest, or 7 profitable quarters despite declining revenue etc. I wouldn't want to discuss anything with them either as it's going to be in bad faith. I hate Fox but Charles will likely get a much better interview out of RC as he's always been far more receptive to what he's trying to do with GS. It's just a lot of noise. Everybody is screaming dilution but RC has also been speaking with the managers of foreign sovereign wealth funds which have much longer timeliness than the private equity firms in the States. I'm just an idiot who's barely been following along though, so what the fuck do I know.

rightovahere

Lol GS just upped Samsung's FY27 and 28 earnings estimates by like 50%. And this is with MU already projected to make about $300 in cumulative EPS from FY26-28 before any revisions.

gotnothingman

I said he failed to do what he critisized the old board for. And he failed to grow the business. Gamestop has been shrinking for years, thats not growing - ergo, he failed to grow it. Now he is trying to merge with a much larger company, thats not organic growth but we can disagree there. In regards to e-commerce, I was specifically talking about his letter to the board of GS and turning GS into an e-commerce juggernaught. Which as of present, he has failed to do. Until the deal goes through, objectively, he has failed to grow GS and failed to turn it into an e-commerce juggernaught. You can disagree, but those are the literal facts of the matter. We can definitely disagree on him buying ebay being growing GS, and I will give you that. I dont think using debt and diluting shareholders to purchase a bigger company really counts as growing the business, but that is my opinion and I can respect your position saying it does count.

Appropriate_Net_4281

Is this a viral marketing joke? How in the world could GS have even remotely that amount of money? I thought for sure they’d be bankrupt by now.

DarkR124

Lmao EBAY at 13% AH right now. GS at almost 8%. Wild.

ApathysLastKiss_

Just got done listening to a podcast with a guy from Goldman Sachs, and they were talking about this very thing. GS considers themselves a market maker for those who want to offload risk, and those who want to buy risk be sure of potential returns. So someone like GS is going to lend the money to GME, and then turn around and securitize that, and sell the debt to risk taking investment firms. If GME makes good on that debt, everyone wins. If they default, well, the lender has already covered their ass buy selling it as a product to someone who was willing to roll the dice.

Phimb

Why do you guys gaslight yourselves with your own shitty mathematics? It went from $4 to $400 then went to $100. Shit's done. So many delusional bagholders in every single GS thread it's unreal.