NAT

nailntrm

NAT

Stunning-Builder1127

Interesting quasi AI, $DVLT at inflated discount. If you want to float a compound dividend reinvestment which has payed quarterly North of twenty years, $NAT is worth your time. My favorite wildcard is $NLST. GOOD LUCK

NotPossible1337

NAT the day after they appeared in Cramer during pandemic lockdown.

imamario

A third, no? You could by over 10 of [these](https://www.walmart.com/ip/Taqqpue-Men-s-Casual-Lightweight-Stretch-Joggers-Athletic-Pants-Summer-Relax-Fit-Drawstring-Elastic-Waist-Soft-Pants/16338257934?wmlspartner=wlpa&selectedSellerId=101645206) from Wally, for one [Lulu](https://shop.lululemon.com/p/men-joggers/License-to-Train-Jogger-Shorter/_/prod11520458?color=0001&locale=en_US&sl=US&sz=M&cid=Google_SHOP_US_NAT_EN_X_BrandShop_Incr-All_OMNI_GEN_Y24_ag-SHOP_G_US_EN_DM_M_GEN_NO_Bottoms-Pants-Joggers&gclsrc=aw.ds&gad_source=4&gad_campaignid=21471260535&gbraid=0AAAAADL8AvlXURIasOqk3rL3iJ5phnk-U&gclid=CjwKCAjwisnGBhAXEiwA0zEOR08NOsFzZf4QPIDHsoPd6ek8pCFg-EWEK_51H96lQZC5IdYBxvOT_BoC_0sQAvD_BwE). Insane

jusjones314

$NAT 3.5C 10/17 @ .13 with .82 gamma 18K vol on 2.6K OI seems strange.

v0rt

The NAT'C half of his base will go ape shit if he does that though, and I don't think the techno fascists really give a shit since the laws don't effect them anyways. Their goal seems to be to deliberately devalue the dollar. Personally I don't see the motivation some are speculating.

No_Feeling920

People no longer get static public IP addresses. This is not year 2000. Shit is shared and NAT'd.

ChemicalMental3144

NAT

Cute_Win_4651

O pays a monthly dividend and has increased for like 25 plus years, ARCC is pretty much the top BDC company out there and pays like $0.48 dividend like 8% , and SCHD is like the top dividend growth ETF if your wanting dividends look at these, cuz I did like quick math for SELF and to hold 100 shares is going to cost like $536 with a $0.073 dividend so it pays about $7 a quarter you’ll get maybe 4/5 shares extra per year but $536 into ARCC @ $22.50 is about 23.7 shares with a $0.48 divided that’s $11.37 per quarter and in O for the same price you’ll get 9.4 shares that pay a monthly dividend of $0.269 so about $2.42 x 12=$29.05 but it’s a top REIT you may want to look into them but SELF doesn’t seem bad for like extra cash maybe also look in NAT

No_Feeling920

There's way too much NAT and external IP address sharing going on today. IP based blocking used to be effective like 20 years ago. They would essentially need to ban all VPN/proxy providers, too. That would get unpopular real quick.

Narrow-Height9477

This is not financial advice. But, my personal small plays. I’m currently keeping an eye on and dabbling in: FLNC BULL NAT ZIM IINC

clappincheeks01

NAT gang checking in

volckerwasright

NAT has all the fundamentals lined up It has a low share price, it has options, and it comes up when search “tanker” on RH

Me-Regarded

Just a strategic part of it, forget the reason now. But NAT gas the world has an abundance of, especially the US.

This_Is_The_End

I'm looking at FRO and NAT

PoopGasMaster

How about a 23 question quiz which tells me what flavor of autism i have? When i was all in on NAT calls during first suez crisis (the one with the ship) imagine predicting id do that. Theres quizzes to find what pony you are on idrlabs im thinking something like that.

Early_Extension_7772

Admin made clear their near term solution is coal, and NAT GAS (all caps) for a near term solution to energy demands. The long term solution is nuclear. Solar did not win any suitors and being a primarily China dominated industry it got taken to the woodshed (or will be when bill is finalized)

ilos_monee

DXY, BRENT, USOIL, backwardation, contango, super contango, top tank, fleet sizing production lower for '26, '27, '28 NAT positioned to profit if transport gas bill is 50% lower remember that freak time oil went negative? with that super contango stuff? how "floating storage" was hot for like a couple weeks? my balls have a tingling sensation that storage is gonna get filled with cheap gas/oil, as storage gets topped, we might get people paying people to take the oil of their hands since they don't want to actually take physical delivery and with OPEC+ pumping, and US pumping, and everybody pumping, we might get sustained low prices causing folks to just store oil cheap, so they can sell oil higher in the future. At a certain point people get so fuq they commission charter ships to just sit in a port with a boat load of oil, so they can sell it in the following months. its like house flipping, or drop shipping, but like for oil ( there's a chance it could happen again, maybe? like its a hail mary get rich or die trying sorta thing )

bilingualbunny

Why NAT?

ilos_monee

i just don't get the excitement or thrill of playing leaps like i need 2DTE and VIX 30+ to feel anything now its like ... i don't even need after care after no lube bare backing, cause LEAPs are like VOO and chill i wish i could load up on 0DTE just to feel again, but i'm full port on NAT $3C '27  I guess i got a few sheckles to toss in, but i dunno maybee i'll just go buy a baconator instead

ilos_monee

I'm full port NAT calls. I'm regard and support this message.

ilos_monee

I have 40 - NAT $3C 2027 leaps as hedge on sustained summer contango and Black swan super contango with 🍂 🍁 top of tank

dweeegs

NAT/STNG gang where u at

CandidAssistance4906

Then you went all in on NAT one day and lost EVERYTHING including the phone with your login info

YoloWingPixie

As an actual cloud engineer: it depends. Azure, AWS, GCP already have large regions of data centers outside of the United States. In the shared responsibility model of the cloud, it's up to the tenants, not the cloud providers, to decide where their data is stored and processed. These companies provide a platform to use, and it's up to the customers to decide how to use the platform. There are extremely prohibitive costs in cross region data transfer rates that all cloud providers charge that disincentives building cross-region applications if you don't need it. This is true of most applications hosted in the cloud, but not the biggest applications hosted in the cloud. Cloud providers would need to change their fee structure for cross-region and perhaps even incentives this for this to work out for them and frankly I don't see that happening. So, the current situation is you have a lot of data already warehoused in the US, and companies are not going to move it unless the benefit of moving it far outweighs the labor cost and time and inconvenience of moving it, and to be clear there is zero benefit today. Furthermore cloud providers already condition companies to look at their cloud bill and loath costs like NAT Gateway charges and cross region data transfer. So it's ultimately a matter of will fee structures for network traffic change so that there are cost benefits for tenants to move their workload out of the US. And even then, most applications really don't like the latency that running your compute in another country incurs, and you can't change the speed of light. And even even then, data privacy laws and financial regulations complicates moving data between any jurisdiction these days, especially to and from the EU.

acart005

RKLB has a chance.... maybe.... sell it if it pumps at any point. No clue what NAT is. DJT is fuk

MysteriousDiscount6

yup, got some NAT GAS leaps, doing well the last couple days

Kale

I don't know a lot about networking. I thought NAT is fine for most tasks, but it's cumbersome for some things. The designers of ipv4 never realized that our phones, computers, light bulbs, game consoles, TVs, and thermostats would all need addresses. Most are fine with NAT (and it might be more secure, I've heard differing opinions on that), but some stuff like having multiple game consoles on the same router can mess with NAT. Do you even need a home router with IPV6? I don't know enough about networking to say. An Internet gateway is given a range of addresses in IPV6, right? So each device on the gateway can have its own publicly-facing address if it needs it, like game consoles and home servers. Plus, now there's juniper and Ubiquiti and pfSense filling in the gaps. Anyways, my belief in Cisco performance shows why I don't invest in individual companies in sectors I don't understand!

plzplzplztendies

NAT 5/29 8c never forget.

jeff303

Why? NAT pretty much solves it.

Generalthesecond

$NAT is the way gard

Lukaloo

Yes, mom. I'm bringing home NAT and FRO. Where's my tanker boys at from covid times?

Weekly-References

Make calls on the VIX if you’re looking for the volatility play. Foreign asset investments in necessities. Shipping puts (likely regardless of your long view as trade wars mean less product), same for steel, NAT gas and liquid gas, grains you can place puts in all the major commodities markets or the entire index… many ways to play. You can also buy business insurance debt ( like some did just before COVID, 10c on the dollar and sell for 1.3- 5 depending on AOC and collateral types. Ofcourse all of this requires you to be right about a pretty End of days black swan event and IMO you just end up as a regarded. Gl cap.

Santarini

I am a software engineer with a CCNP. Believe me, I know how it works. Judging by your inaccurate generalizations, you clearly do not. Your public IP address is dynamically assigned by your ISP from a block of IP addresses they own. Your modem gets a unique IP address--modems cannot share a single IP address that would create an IP conflict. That's basic TCP/IP networking 101. Your IP address may be dynamic, but it is certainly not anonymous. You may get x.x.x.12 today and x.x.x.182 tomorrow, but the MAC address of your modem is regustered with your ISP. Otherwise, they wouldn’t extend you an IP lease. You’re describing Source Network Address Translation (SNAT). Packets are forwarded to your public IP, and then your edge router routes traffic to private IPs on your LAN. In this case, yes, clients behind the NAT have a sort of anonymity unless someone has access to your MAC tables. There is no browser "fingerprint." It's a combination of browser build, device OS build, that is unique. You can also very easily spoof your browser agent. https://www.searchenginejournal.com/change-user-agent/368448/ Even if a nefarious actor knew the unique parameters of your HTTP requests, they would still have to prove that that unique combination was a stack a specific individual used. Learn more about TCP/IP networking if you're so concerned about people knowing about your obviously embarrassing Internet traffic.

bubbawears

Ceasefire at SPY600 Coincidence? I THINK NAT

v0rt

I know a lot of stoner MAGA's are hopeful but I just don't have the faith that the NAT'C wing will be kept in check. Have to see how it play out, either way I think there it's best to be nimble and cash heavy going forward for now.

ItsBig777

NAT GAS and CRYPTO, RIOT gonna pop to $20 this week.

ItsBig777

These NAT GAS calls I went balls deep into are going to PRINT this week.

StockJockeyNYC

EXE - \*CO. IS TALKING WITH ALL STAKEHOLDERS ON DIRECT SUPPLY FOR AI NAT GAS to supply data centers. Long as much nat gas EQT RRC BOIL and $BE

duoderf1

NAT was my biggest winner. It was a oil tanker company and the week of the first lockdowns the stock absolutely tanked from $4 down to $2.75. My brother called to tell me to buy that and FLIR (thermal scopes) because of rumors he was reading online about the short term impacts of their industries on covid. I bought NAT at $2.75 and when they started getting paid to store oil without actually shipping it, the stock jumped up to $6, I sold just under the all time high. I bought FLIR at $35 and sold at $55 before it topped out at $60.

drew-gen-x

$NAT, $DHT. and $FXY. I am more risk adverse and I am fine collecting the dividends.

purplecatfishbettie

some interesting back and forth in the comments at yahoo [https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/NAT/community/](https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/NAT/community/)

purplecatfishbettie

looks like NAT are paying a helluva dividend... i've seen a lot worse... ymmv

Wolf_of_Wynyard1

The biggest risk with this trade is Putin signing a peace deal or being assassinated because Russian gas will crash the market. I am long on NAT gas.

Humble_Increase7503

NAT was pumping NOT because oil prices were high. They were actually at $0 at the time. It was because they were at $0 that NAT pumped, bc they were just storing oil on ships at a bijallion dollars a day. I just mentioned them bc ZIM was pumping around that same time… But then, like NAT, ZIM ended up cutting their dividend, which presently is at almost nothing. Do as you will, but I think these sorts of stocks are danger danger Will Robinson

Brilliant_Pepperoni

NAT Nordic American Tankers

BigTitsanBigDicks

First off their product is not market leader. Their competitors offer better, and a lot of their sales are legacy. I thought that would go away slowly, but with recent fuckups it may not be so slow. 10 Years ago Intel made the best chips in the world, now they dont. Secondly how they got here: Culture of incompetence. That company needs a hostile takeover & cleansweep or it wont change. They had the 'too big to fail' mindset, and it was true for decades, but now the parties over & whoevers left is holding the bag. I dont wanna delve deep into sociology theory, but the 'generation that built it' was replaced by the generation that cashed in. Interpret that how you will. Lastly no matter what they do their old position is not coming back. Intel isnt going bankrupt, they will be a partial player in the field, and the US govt. will lean on them for NAT SEC reasons. But Intel used to have a product with **global** appeal that the whole world needed to be a competitive modern country. Those days are gone & will not be allowed to return. I guess a bonus point isnt about the company but about investors: Mass Delusion. The stock price has not been allowed to fall either through hopium, market manipulation, bailouts, or idk what have you.

yaboiRich

NAT gang 2020 was fun

Brilliant_Pepperoni

NAT Nordic American Tankers for the win!

NationalOwl9561

All I know is Fortinet is the only VPN I've come across that will block Wireguard VPN protocol INCLUDING Tailscale which uses fancy NAT traversal techniques.

tacocat_-_racecar

SVRA and NAT for me. I also like Rio Tinto that you mentioned.

r1ckm4n

Internet is sometimes triple NAT’d at the fucking provider level. Their electrical grid is also something worth looking at if you’ve ever wondered “how bad did I fuck up today?” The answer is “not India bad.”

Particles1101

NAT already popped. Maybe DSX?

Edge-Psychological

Dont worry jpow is currently fudging the numbers to save you bulls…… NAT

tetrisan

Sink Fox News? Have you seen how many viewers OAN has as a % of reach? Not sure how they are still broadcasting with those sad numbers. And Newsmax is ranked 72 out 110 networks (NAT GEO WLD has more viewers) 🤣

PokemonCardValues

I got out early on that rollercoaster and I'm glad I did. Put it all back where it belongs giving me dividend dreams in NAT

DaveyoSlc

$NAT & $DSX have been on a roll. they have a Divy announcement any day now. great Divy too!! $NAT $4.20 .12 Divy. $DSX $3.15 .075 Divy. I'm thinking DSX Divy is higher this time. both companies are making tons of $$. no reason the dividends not to keep flowing and the SP keep rising

pizzaboy69696

NAT

BarracudaUnlucky8584

If I go to open a Call option I see I can open it at market or at limit where I set a price. In my broker I can see "Opp, Mid, Nat" basically if opening at market the bar is at NAT and if I drop the price it goes down to Opp. I assume this is related to the other bids on this option contract? Which leads me to my question - can you monitor the order book to see all the bids and asks of an option?

sonofalando

https://openvpn.net/community-resources/how-to/ Needs to be a 0 routed full tunnel vpn meaning all traffic flows through the vpn including internet traffic. You can then configure open vpn on your iPhone or mobile decide to connect to the server when away. IPsec will have better performance that the above solution which is ssl vpn I’m sure some googling will explain how you can terminate IPsec vpn. You’ll likely need to NAT the traffic from your comcast router/modem(also known as port forwarding) to a local pc that’s acting as the vpn server. For IPsec it uses protocol 50 and UDP 500 for the NAT traversal, for SSLVPN which is posted above it uses tcp 443 by default the same port and protocol used for HTTPS traffic when you visit secure websites.

moonordie69420

got back into NAT stock. bought 100 shares and a Put, just to dip my toe in. Good idea?

Uptober

I think it's a big opportunity in the next week or 2! Yes called the widow maker but also said to turn a very red portfolio into a very green portfolio if timed right. There looks to be the rapid dip and test of 1.5 once every 4-5 years in the last 15 years, it did hit 1.6 weeks ago but should see a double bottom of about the same atleast or where I'm betting in the 1.5 - 1.55 range. I think there's still enough tensions and things to influence NAT gas on the macro level in the coming year after these lows (right on time) politically will be looked to be manipulate to the upside as much as possible after that if my tin foil hat is on. The last big waves that hit $10 didn't really get a second shoulder at $6 so that looks to be a long target.

Deep_Adagio_3318

NAT. Not very volatile but I was able to buy between $2-3. And the dividends are usually solid. I'm up almost 40% on the shares and the dividends the past couple years have made me another 20%

jwarsenal9

Cute word play, but it is a [legal term](https://content.next.westlaw.com/Search/Results.html?query=selling%20shareholder&isPremiumAdvanceSearch=False&saveJuris=False&contentType=KNOWHOW&querySubmissionGuid=i0ad6ad3a0000018e6b4981bbac6d8fd1&startIndex=1&categoryPageUrl=Home%2FPracticalLaw&searchId=i0ad6ad3a0000018e6b4981bbac6d8fd1&kmSearchIdRequested=False&simpleSearch=False&isAdvancedSearchTemplatePage=False&skipSpellCheck=False&isTrDiscoverSearch=False&thesaurusSearch=False&thesaurusTermsApplied=False&ancillaryChargesAccepted=False&proviewEligible=False&eventingTypeOfSearch=NAT&trailingSpace=False&citationSortable=False&useNonBillableZoneClientId=False&transitionType=Search&contextData=%28sc.Default%29)

CryptographerOk2928

https://preview.redd.it/q9i9aqoeoync1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=53f0b4159f81d5ee66597325ae028a116ac57482 Or buy this tanker company that’s printing more cash than it ever has because it’s a war profiting company!!!! If the analyst and online info is right it should print by 2025 or 2027 NAT CALLS !!!

Liberobscura

Good for PLTR- any espionage in public is going to be good for counter intelligence. The fucked up part if you understand this world- BA’s secret shit is done at the phantomworks, and their f18 money is all guaranteed- that isnt really ever going to be priced in, because its NAT SEC… So from an existential assesment, if youre trying to torpedo america or lower public optics this doesn’t really make sense. Most likely he killed himself because he has survivors guilt and his work likely cost lives.

CryptographerOk2928

ANYONE INTO TANKERS? Or is it just me? Read about NAT - https://preview.redd.it/hgg20kktcgkc1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=64a09cd370d73f50115604539d89d0223daf7bed CEO writing sonnets… “the best we have seen in decades” This dude is PRINTING money off of the reroutes, and current geopolitical circumstances. $4 a share, Blackrock, Morgan Stanley, and some others deep in public purchases. P/E 7 Reporting earnings next week, I think they’re going to BLOW IT OUT OF THE WATER! Get it hahaha

livingindxbhelp

If you are bag holding NAT , you are an OG here.

Opening-Somewhere218

Been lurking since 2020 NAT calls. Only recently came back once my curiosity got the best of me.

BagHelda

Take the time to check the price of NAT GAS.

BagHelda

Take the time to check the price of NAT GAS.

Creamville-

Good time to short KOLD? Realistically how much lower can NAT gas go 

Chornobyl_Explorer

Boeing AMC Gamestonk MSOS ACB (Aurora) NAT (tankers)

UNHBuzzard

Tanker gang, it’s time to rise. NAT 5c 2/16.

Calm_Cronos

Good idea. Been buying these and also CLOU, NVDA, NAT, and RXO options.

Humble_Increase7503

Bro this reminds me of 3 years ago when everyone was buying NAT and STNG. These stocks are dogshit. In and out, make your money but bounce quick if you’re in these shitty shipping stocks

Particles1101

Holding onto my NAT calls and UA puts for dear life.

Particles1101

I have calls on NAT and I am pretty happy.

Kooky_Lime1793

I go with Shipping Freighters and Containers but not the typical, partly because of what is happening in the Red Sea but I bought shares of NAT and am eyeing Matson right now.

beholdthemoldman

>ZIM already had its run up. NAT is the silent gold mine in the shipping equation. lmfao this shit is not so simple. I got rekt on nat gas (ik is not NAT) last year bc bad weather+shorts or something

iyervikas81

Anyone falling for the tanker gang again? I did and bought 300 shares of NAT for old memories

Lobsterbib

ZIM already had its run up. NAT is the silent gold mine in the shipping equation.

Aggressive_Train_673

Boil is just 2x UNG which I believe is an ETF based off the spot price of NAT gas

Marketspike

$NAT and other tanker stocks will be affected

UNHBuzzard

I’ve got another good decade of tax loss harvesting rollovers thanks to NAT.

Megarobot742

Reading this gave me PTSD from being a covid bagholder for NAT...

iyervikas81

Lol, what was the other one NAT?

JAnon19

anybody here swing trade NAT

Valianne11111

I had NAT back in 2004. Wow

butterflyfrenchfry

My 2020 NAT calls 😪

FacitBull5O

I have also been buying a few long shots like NAT

SweatyMeasurement837

NAT

Sweet_Sharist

Yup. Just an intellectual curiosity bordering on mental masturbation that has so many variables and abstractions that you’re never going to master it. Besides. There’s always a degree of black swan on the table. It cool to think about it, but unless it’s a trend based on ever evolving NAT SEC it’s not really tradable for more than a quarter.

dxbwhereisthat

Any of the OG tanker gang still holding NAT and happy about the target set at 6 USD ?

EffUtube

BoxeeBox and 4TB NAT.

livingindxbhelp

If NAT WOULD GO UP by 2 USD I would make my money back. Tanker gang knows what's up.

Liberobscura

A collapse will destroy the fiat and the blood in the streets and the overarching greed of this society being an informational and entertainment exporter will not be able to balance the demand of status quo valuations. When the money in tandem with the property values collapse the credit market will follow in suit and no one has answers to greed vanity and the pursuits of avarice that continually lead to this theme repeating. The only real proven answer to this market dynamic is war. Less people, an implied unifying purpose and opportunity for lower educated classes to stratify, and a great violent distraction. It is hard to think about big picture re writes of culture when youre being launched on and constantly fighting for your life. Travel restrictions and massive famines transition of valuations of water supplies from commoditization into defense and NAT sec. and continued destabilization of trade and birth rates. The smart guys give us till around 2032 and by 2045 global crisis and destabilization of norms almost constant war is most likely.

Wolf_of_Wynyard1

I think there is more of a bear case for CF. The link between NAT GAS and CF profits rely on a high European gas price and a low north American gas price. Their best year ever was last year and is unlikely to be repeated. So be a rainbow bear.

RayMilland

I'm in NAT and I love the big dividends they're paying.

Sweet_Sharist

Shrugs shoulders. I don’t mind. I had good role models. I remember flying in to see my dad for his eightieth birthday and he tossed me the keys to his car. He was losing his hearing. When I turned the key in the ignition I was startled by Run DMC’s Raising Hell at decibel level ten. Lol. Why let age define you? I mean I just started ‘investing’ about 28 months ago. You can always learn new tricks. I also lean more towards technology and innovation. So, that colors things a bit. I suppose the most conservative thing I am colored by is my deep interest in NAT SEC. So that keeps me diversified, or in cash, and never overextended.