DHT

_Kinoko

As a developer I feel the need for having crypto or everything decentralized is exaggerated by the community. The cloud is so distributed , reliable and easy to use it doesn't really matter. And if it does then why should crypto be involves or the public even care, it will be like websockets, redis or DHT. Regarding the libertarian dream I just don't see it at this point due to regulation, the nuisance of the software, the need for KYC fiat on/off ramps, taxation and the fact it's not a currency really at this point. Listen, I love decentralized tech like bittorent, etc but if I have to upload a picture of my face to buy crypto and get taxed when I buy stuff with it then it's worst than fiat or even silver/gold. If I can earn crypto and exchange it without surveillance then the libertarian thesis is alive, until then I'm just using it for speculation, as are most.

strings___

Take for example Bitcoin's block chain. It is not a database. If you look at real world use cases other then blockchains for merkle trees. None of those are databases either. For example BTRFS, GIT, ZFS, IPFS. Hint all of this are file systems. Again why? because of the ability to do fast self verification. To continue to refer to blockchains as databases is not only wrong but it continues to feed the false narrative that Blockchains are just inefficient databases. As for the age of Merkle technologies. I'm not seeing the point here. In the context of Bitcoin the novel solution to money is not about one piece of technology but the sum of all the parts that matter. Proof of work, as you mention being a piece. But also things like using a DHT (distributed hash table). Yes all of these technologies have been used before. But it's the combination of these technologies that made and still makes Bitcoin unique.

sombralkem

>You can set your acceptable fee rate below the default, but the default is 1 sat per vbyte or else you get ejected. The reason the default exists is because of spam (like people trying to vote in the mempool lol) So you'd have to come up with some kind of peering system probably using a DHT > >Now its great and all when voting is acceptable to everyone, but have you ever heard of "botting"? Good points. Network congestion is definitely not the objective though. Is botting a thing on the mempool?

nerd2ninja

You can set your acceptable fee rate below the default, but the default is 1 sat per vbyte or else you get ejected. The reason the default exists is because of spam (like people trying to vote in the mempool lol) So you'd have to come up with some kind of peering system probably using a DHT Now its great and all when voting is acceptable to everyone, but have you ever heard of "botting"?

strings___

If you cant handling talking or understanding merkle trees, distributed hash tables (DHT), and cryptography. You probably shouldn't be a PhD student.

Bassfaceapollo

Appreciate such posts. Just want to rectify some things - >In decentralized storage, data is broken up into smaller pieces and distributed across a network of storage providers, rather than being stored on a centralized server. This reduces the risk of data breaches and makes it more difficult for hackers to access or corrupt the data. Not necessarily. It entirely depends on what centralized and decentralized storage services you are comparing. As much as I hate the big 3 cloud bois, S3 is still the go to storage provider for a good reason. It is technologically ahead of whatever the "Web 3.0" space has to offer right now. Also, distributed infrastructure implementations exist already. Sure a central authority controls them but you still get the security benefits of using them, not everyone is using a single server to store everything. >Decentralized storage solutions also offer greater privacy and control for users, as they do not have to rely on third-party companies to store and manage their data. Privacy and data sovereignty depend on the decentralized storage service of choice. If I share a file via IPFS but then want itnto to be taken down then it might not be possible because someone else might still be pinning the file. If you want complete control over your data then just self-host Pydio Cells. Privacy is also questionable, I don't recollect Tor/I2P compatibility for any decentralized storage services and IPFS based solutions are P2P. Also, while DHT crawlers might not be as common as with torrents but I'd imagine the same should apply here to some extent, so using the public DHT means your privacy goes kaput. >On top of that, many decentralized storage platforms use a form of distributed storage called IPFS (InterPlanetary File System) which allows data to be stored in a decentralized way. IPFS uses a combination of content-addressable storage and a distributed hash table to store files in a decentralized way, rather than storing them on a centralized server. IPFS isn't a storage per se. IPFS is a protocol that allows one to deterministically retrieve data via content based addressing. The data itself still needs to be stored somewhere, be it your local PC or a traditional server. To ensure files on IPFS are always available one needs to pin a file. Which disregarding the technical aspects is conceptually similar to BitTorrent's seeding. IPFS isn't the only data retrieval protocol either, there's also good old BitTorrent and Hypercore (Dat). But these protocols differ from one another at a technical level. Filecoin, Jackal (Cosmos chain) are basically ways to incentivize people to ensure that data is always available on IPFS. Think of them as the incentive layer to IPFS. I haven't heard of ANT and Skale, so won't comment on them. But about the rest - 1. Ocean - It's a data marketplace. I know you didn't refer to it as a storage solution, but I find it weird to be placed alongside the rest. 2. Band - It's a oracle trying to play catch-up with LINK. It's relevance in the storage space is minimal. 3. SAFE - It's been a while but this seems closer to GNUnet or Freenet. Not at a technical level but rather at a philosophical level. Safe wishes to create an alternate internet. They even have their own protocol stack fleshed out on top of the existing IP suite. It's a decent project, haven't looked at them in a while. I wonder if they have a proper product now. Btw, they're not a storage service either. So shouldn't be in this discussion. They're what you bring up when discussing Tor, I2P, Nym, Lokinet etc. 4. Storj and Sia - I only have a cursory understanding of Storj but Sia is a good example. It doesn't use IPFS (as you correctly pointed out) but it can be used in conjunction with it. A new email service called Telios does this. They store encrypted emails on Sia and use IPFS to retrieve them. Overall good post OP. Just wanted to point out some technical misunderstandings in the post.

MisterRGnome

It's absolutely true that alts have no ultility and are scams. They are scams because they advertise properties they do not and cannot have. Blockchains don't scale as they are infinite append only databases, provide no anonymity or censorship resistance, imply no decentralization, blockchains have essentially no valuable properties of themselves and are more or less glorified linked lists. The properties people value in Bitcoin are emergent from independent and aware actors securing and verifying for themselves their bitcoin usage - which you can't really even do on all these other centrally controlled illegal securities adopting buzzwords and fighting for VC cash. Just like the valuable properties of bittorrent have nothing to do with rar archives or DHT's but instead with your independent ability to seed and leech what you want, your choices as network participants using software you control from volunteer developers are where the value begins to emerge. How you store and handle data is just that, nothing special. These buzzwords are effectively being used by companies to push horrible scams and illegal securities. Avoid blockchain like a plague. If you think you have value of its base data structures like merkle trees and hash linked lists use those. But don't use a blockchain or any of this "defi" lying insecure nonsense. Some simple litmus tests anyone of any skill level can apply to avoid these shitcoin scams: If it had an ICO, it's centralized. If it has a company operating it, it's centralized. If it uses proof of stake, it's centralized. If it has anything but volunteer adhoc developer contributions and funding by community members, it's centralized. If it has an autoupdate mechanism or only one repo, it's centralized. If it uses PoW but lacks a majority of the possible hashpower for that algorithm on the planet, it's a minority chain and unsecured. If you don't understand the code enough that you could help reimplement it, you don't understand the code. Most shitcoins are downstream of bitcoin repos for this reason. Companies that trade in scams are at extremely high risks, as are their users who don't use those high risk products. A shitcoin exchange is as dangerous as it's shittiest shitcoin. Blockchain is a buzzword, a nearly useless append only, unscalable infinite linked list. It has no properties of immutability or censorship resistance whatsoever, as easily provable by running one and editing it yourself. Borrowing/lending is no different from leverage in that you can and will get liquidated. Youtube, reddit, telegram, discord, twitter - these are NOT places to educate yourself. Go read a codebase!! If you lack this skill it is a necessary one to learn, there is no substitute. Most code is english-readable as are developer discussions and protocol specifications. You can always read abstracts. I make these points because it is you, this community's members who still don't understand why shitcoins are scams, who are the indirect cause of so much fucking suffering in this ecosystem and so many goddamn scammers. You MUST learn and do better if we're ever going to see a population of informed, sovereign, fully validating and node running protocol members. It's certainly not the case that Bitcoin cannot improve, that's why we have BIP's. It's that shitcoins have yet to do anything of value. If they did, we'd simply adopt it in Bitcoin. To-date there is nothing but junk engineering and the building of scams going on in that space. What novel things people think come from altcoins, like monero ring sigs, are in fact renamed Bitcoin technologies like bulletproofs and confidential transactions. Shitcoins are preying on user ignorance. Your ignorance. Stop being ignorant.

MisterRGnome

Blockchains don't scale as they are infinite append only databases, provide no anonymity or censorship resistance, imply no decentralization, blockchains have essentially no valuable properties of themselves and are more or less glorified linked lists. The properties people value in Bitcoin are emergent from independent and aware actors securing and verifying for themselves their bitcoin usage - which you can't really even do on all these other centrally controlled illegal securities adopting buzzwords and fighting for VC cash. Just like the valuable properties of bittorrent have nothing to do with rar archives or DHT's but instead with your independent ability to seed and leech what you want, your choices as network participants using software you control from volunteer developers are where the value begins to emerge. How you store and handle data is just that, nothing special. These buzzwords are effectively being used by companies to push horrible scams and illegal securities. Avoid blockchain like a plague. If you think you have value of its base data structures like merkle trees and hash linked lists use those. But don't use a blockchain or any of this "defi" lying insecure nonsense. Some simple litmus tests anyone of any skill level can apply to avoid these shitcoin scams: If it had an ICO, it's centralized. If it has a company operating it, it's centralized. If it uses proof of stake, it's centralized. If it has anything but volunteer adhoc developer contributions and funding by community members, it's centralized. If it has an autoupdate mechanism or only one repo, it's centralized. If it uses PoW but lacks a majority of the possible hashpower for that algorithm on the planet, it's a minority chain and unsecured. If you don't understand the code enough that you could help reimplement it, you don't understand the code. Most shitcoins are downstream of bitcoin repos for this reason. Companies that trade in scams are at extremely high risks, as are their users who don't use those high risk products. A shitcoin exchange is as dangerous as it's shittiest shitcoin. Blockchain is a buzzword, a nearly useless append only, unscalable infinite linked list. It has no properties of immutability or censorship resistance whatsoever, as easily provable by running one and editing it yourself. Borrowing/lending is no different from leverage in that you can and will get liquidated. Youtube, reddit, telegram, discord, twitter - these are NOT places to educate yourself. Go read a codebase!! If you lack this skill it is a necessary one to learn, there is no substitute. Most code is english-readable as are developer discussions and protocol specifications. You can always read abstracts. I make these points because it is you, this community's members who **still don't understand why shitcoins are scams**, who are the indirect cause of so much fucking suffering in this ecosystem and so many goddamn scammers. You MUST learn and do better if we're ever going to see a population of informed, sovereign, fully validating and node running protocol members.

whitslack

Bitcoin's peer-to-peer network is quite different from a DHT. In fact, as decentralized data dissemination protocols go, it's just about the polar opposite of a DHT. Whereas a DHT is a structured network, Bitcoin's peer-to-peer network is unstructured. Connections between nodes in the Bitcoin Network are essentially randomized, and information propagates by flooding. Connections between nodes in a DHT are structured based on a node's address in the DHT, and information propagates by nearest-neighbor resolution and routing.

igadjeed

> I just took it for granted as it just works like BitTorrent Bittorrent trackers are centralized. The bittorrent DHT is not. Bitcoin is similar to the bittorrent DHT - a connection to one peer enables access to the entire DHT

thulle

It's a ok number, but analysis is lacking. Lots of regular services post higher uptimes. But as can be seen in the thread, uptime becomes a bit weird when talking about distributed networks. Torrent DHT beats btc anyway. I file this under the regular bs hype-posts to keep self/sect/community in high spirits when the exchangerate graph looks depressing.

BakedPotato840

It's gonna be interesting to see how this plays out. >Keet.io is a Peer-to-Peer Chat App, built with the Holepunch platform that allows anyone to create apps that don’t use any servers >Keet will allow users to schedule audio and video calls, send text chat and share files for free, Bitfinex and Tether said in a statement shared with The Block on Monday. The Keet app is powered by a technology called Distributed Holepunching (DHT) that allows users to locate and connect to each other "using only cryptographic key pairs upon authorization." >The Holepunch protocol is currently closed source and plans to move to open-source code in December. Once open source, anyone can build applications on the protocol and make money, Ardoino added. >Holepunch will also integrate the Lightning Network in its protocol and the tether stablecoin (USDT) to support a default payments system.

MrRGnome

You can have any number of people contributing to anything in a way they control and have it be decentralized. DHT torrents are decentralized. Ad hoc community organizations are decentralized. But just like how miners are not responsible for our properties of decentralization, they are responsible for our properties of economic security. The problem with PoS is it does not fulfill the role of economic security or decentralization. The economic security is locked in at whatever the cheapest price to acquire a minority stake ever was and it 99% of shitcoins conflate the roles of nodes and miners/pos. The resource management is so poor in shitcoins that only a few full nodes ever run and the few validators serving all these users become the protocol.

suninabox

> Seeing as how Bitcoin uses DHT. basically it's a bittorrent network already Apart from the not being free to use, having terrible speed and capacity and not being useful for anything except greater fool speculation.

strings___

Seeing as how Bitcoin uses DHT. basically it's a bittorrent network already. Bitcoin was greatly influenced by bittorrent.

igadjeed

> You had claimed that Bitcoin Core also uses a DHT Would you like me to edit my comment to make your misquote true?

whitslack

Right, that's what I'm saying. There are many ways to do peer discovery. Bitcoin Core implements two that I know of (DNS seeds and unstructured gossip). You had claimed that Bitcoin Core also uses a DHT (related to Kademlia) to find peers. I am pretty sure that's not true, as I've never seen any Kademlia code, or indeed any DHT code in general, in Bitcoin Core.

whitslack

Bitcoin nodes gossip the addresses of other nodes they know about. There's no DHT involved in that.

whitslack

>Nodes use a variant of Kademlia Are you certain about that? I've never seen any evidence of Kademlia in Bitcoin Core. And there's currently no use for a DHT in Bitcoin.

selphfourgiveness

Yes, it’s closely linked to the DHT candlestick pattern, converging with the 200-day moving hair loss average

estebanabaroa

>pubsub is or uses pubsub in a context that I've never seen It's not regular pubsub, it's "peer to peer pubsub". It's a pubsub, but p2p, anyone can join, subscribe, publish. The libp2p project has an implementation of this https://github.com/libp2p/specs/blob/master/pubsub/gossipsub/gossipsub-v1.0.md >public key based addressing Public key based addressing is what IPNS is. "Public key based addressing" is an appropriate way to describe IPNS https://docs.ipfs.io/concepts/ipns/ >Why do you even need a public key? You need a public key pair to use the public key hash (the "ipns name") to create a rendez vous point for the P2P swarm. In bittorrent/ipfs this rendez vous point is the hash of the file. In ipns, it's the hash of a public key. The reason it has to be a public key, is because the "data" (ipns calls it ipns record) needs to be signed by the private key it, otherwise anyone could publish new data to this rendez vous point. >Proof of Balance Proof of balance is just one of the optional ways to combat spam. If a community owner wants to issue a token and only lets people who hold this token post in his community, we will allow him to do that. If someone doesn't like crypto and doesn't want to use crypto at all in his own subplebbit, we will also allow him to do that. The protocol lets community owners use any challenge they want in order to post. But having at least one challenge type is essential, otherwise your pubsub will get DDOSed. >Even around hundreds of users hitting an IPFS server Plebbit doesn't use servers, people run their own IPFS nodes, which gets bundled with the client. Also cloudflare-ipfs.com is an IPFS gateway that has hundreds of users hitting an IPFS server. >reddit servers are more than 1000x more efficient than IPFS servers Reddit has hundreds of millions of uncached database queries to serve, plebbit has no database query, all requests are IPFS or IPNS request, which are static files, and the bandwidth is distributed amongst all peers using Kademlia DHT (Bittorrent/IPFS p2p swarm design).

striata

It's not federated, it's distributed using IPFS/DHT. There's a distinction there, but in both cases this has absolutely nothing to do with blockchain or cryptocurrency.

gkaykck

I'm trying to read the whitepaper, and here are my issues, 1 - The author doesn't understand what pubsub is or uses pubsub in a context that I've never seen. Pubsub systems normally just carry messages from publishers to subscribers but they usually forget about the messages after they are delivered. The author seems like thinking you can subscribe to a pubsub message even after the published went offline, which is wrong. 2 - >In Bittorrent, you have "content based addressing". The hash of a file becomes its address. With "public key based addressing", the hash of a public key becomes the address of the subplebbit. Network peers perform a DHT query of this address to retrieve the content of the subplebbit. Each time the content gets updated, the nonce of the content increases. The network only keeps the latest nonce. There is no content here. "public key based addressing" doesn't make sense. Why it's a public key? Why do you even need a public key? What is the private key doing here? It makes somehow even less sense when used in the next sentence to "content based addressing". 3 - >The captcha service can be replaced by other "anti-spam strategies", such proof of balance of a certain cryptocurrency. For example, a subplebbit owner might require that posts be signed by users holding at least 1 ETH, or at least 1 token of his choice. "Proof of Balance" is something I heard the first time. I don't really want to go into details of why this won't work, but just imagine some subreddits being able to bypass the captcha services of reddit and then try to imagine how your frontpage would look like. 4 - >This might be fitting for celebrities wanting to use their subplebbit as a form of "onlyfan", where fans pay to interact with them. Classy. 5 - >Proof of balance/payment are deterministic so the P2P pubsub network can block spam attacks deterministically. ??? What is "poorly described here" is sounding a lot like IPFS. I'm curious what they are doing in their repositories, [https://github.com/plebbit/plebbit-js](https://github.com/plebbit/plebbit-js) \-> "wrap around the IPFS APIs used by Plebbit." Ah ok, mystery solved. What it is a thin wrapper around IPNS and IPFS. It's not an incredible idea, it's not a "new" idea, it's not even blockchain or crypto, not sure why it's in this subreddit. It's a peer-to-peer messaging system with a short cache. That's all. Also, it doesn't need a whitepaper, it just needs 1 page of project description and that's it. [https://github.com/plebbit/whitepaper/issues/5](https://github.com/plebbit/whitepaper/issues/5) \-> No idea how to do spam filtering [https://github.com/plebbit/whitepaper/issues/3](https://github.com/plebbit/whitepaper/issues/3) \-> No idea if IPFS can scale that much(hint, it can't, I know because I'm working with IPFS daily. Even around hundreds of users hitting an IPFS server/hour is too much, reddit servers are more than 1000x more efficient than IPFS servers) And there is a lot of funding pushed from gitcoin. So it seems like a project with high ambitions, good funding but poor planning to me. But anyway, what do I know in a world where SHIB is still in TOP15 in market cap :) So good luck!

i_have_chosen_a_name

Well it only launched like 4 months ago. It has Viegage.com which is a financial construction that replaces the mortgage (and also allows people to home finance with using crypto) It has https://blockng.money/#/mint which is a crypto punk fork that has proof of punk mining. It has it's open opensea called https://oasis.cash/ It has 12 dexes or so, the most interesting one is mistswap where the dex token rewards are algorithmic based on trade volume + governance to prevent wash traders from wreaking havoc. SmartBCH also does tx randomization which makes front running a lot harder and expensive. It is connected to wallet.hybrix.io which works over DHT and TOR and allows decentralized non custodial swaps between 32 blockchains and 500 tokens and smartBCH. (and they are working on a bank router so it will have non custodial and decentralised fiat in and out gates). Coinflex is integrating with it, they have a really nice AMM system and also the first exchange that had perpetual futures with delivery (before Bakkt) https://coinflex.com/dao Really it has a lot already in the 4 months after launch. About 3500 - 5000 daily users at the moment. And since BCH is very well supported. I can do my yield farming, using hop.cash on to virgocx and from yield farming to CAD on my bank account takes about 15 to 20 minutes. Or I spend the BCH direcly on newegg.ca or on amazon using purse.io So yeah, it's really great to have DeFI on top of Bitcoin Cash. And it burns BCH as well, has burned 263 worth of gas fees in the last 4 months. https://smartbch.fountainhead.cash/grafana/d/GUnTOBGnz/smartbch?from=now-5m&to=now&refresh=5s&orgId=1

ymgve

Some of these are completely unrelated though. There are no blind signatures, no DHT, no property titles in Bitcoin.

lesner555

Thats true. Its the DHT in testosteron that causes it lmao

SupahJoe

IPFS allows distributed file storage that doesn't rely on a known web server location (similar to torrents+DHT). SVG allows direct on chain storage of an image.

i_have_chosen_a_name

I have used sideshift.ai for that, for years ... and you don't need an account with them and merchants don't even need to know about them. Also hybrix allows exactly the same as Flex (works with 32 blockchains and 500 tokens) and runs decentralised on TOR and DHT. Anything that is not decentralised won't be robust enough to survive what's to come. Building centralised layers on top of decentralised layers is not wise. You are taking away power and control from people but offer them a little bit of convenience and comfort. But once the decentralized user interfaces also offer that convenience and comfort then how can they still compete with something hat works the same but offers more power and control? Also flexa wants to make money on being a middleman so system that cut out the middleman will have lower overhead costs and out compete them.

twitterInfo_bot

I just swapped over BNB and BCH to SmartBCH. Non custodial and decentralised. Runs over TOR and DHT. Using Hybrix. Making a video now. We are going to need 500 people running a hybrix node and allocate 1 BCH and 1 sBCH.Then from 500 tokens and 32 blockchains assets can be swapped *** posted by [@BCHpizza_org](https://twitter.com/BCHpizza_org) Photos in tweet | [Photo 1](http://pbs.twimg.com/media/FBLDWyVX0B4YzOe.jpg) ^[(Github)](https://github.com/username) ^| ^[(What's new)](https://github.com/username)

RedactedRedditery


masixx

DHT or any Blockchain itself doesn't provide methods to authenticate real world goods. The subject has been discussed multiple times.

masixx

OF is a easy to use platform. Crypto is not. Sorry to destroy your wishful thinking but no cheap bitches on DHT anytime soon for you guys.

OfficerTruth

HOT- Target entry: $0.0095-$0.0103 Price at time of writing: $0.0116 Resistance: $0.012, $0.0131, $0.01375 Support: $0.01025, $0.0096, $0.0087 Current market cap: $2.06B Ethereum address: 0x6c6ee5e31d828de241282b9606c8e98ea48526e2 Holochain intends to offer a distributed framework for generalized computing that supports programming and application development, something the Holochain team believes other crypto-projects do not offer. Holochain is a data integrity protocol for distributed applications that uses a Distributed Hash Table (DHT) that in essence gives every participant their own "chain". Holochain is not a blockchain, despite what the name implies; publishing information on a DHT is similar to using a service like BitTorrent. On top of Holochain sits Holo, a distributed network of hosts and users sharing and consuming computing power to host decentralized applications (dApps), data repositories, etc., and hosts are paid for their services. But in the same way Holochain is not a blockchain, according to the development team, Holo is also not a token: it's an "asset-backed mutual-credit crypto-accounting system" that Holochain designed for use between participants and for immunity to volatile or speculative habits common to crypto projects. Exchanges: Binance, Coinex, Gate.io, Uniswap

unc4l1n

Holochain uses a DHT as its way of accessing data and communication between nodes is via gossip, like Herera. Fundamentally different from a DAG.

cheapdrinks

If you're not too far gone then try PRP therapy. It's much cheaper and way less invasive than a transplant and you don't risk the side effects of the oral medication like Finasteride or have to go through months of having a scabby gross looking scalp like with a transplant. Basically they take a vial of your blood, spin it in a centrifuge and extract the platelet rich plasma (PRP) then inject it back into your scalp. They use super fine needles that only go just barely under the skin so it doesn't hurt much at all. They usually recommend 6-10 sessions with each one 2 weeks apart as well as using minoxidil daily, then a single maintenance sessions every 3-6 months after to maintain it. Each session is quick too, you get your blood taken, wait 10 mins for it to spin then they prick your head with it for 10 mins and you're on your way so it's easy to fit in once a fortnight. You can also use something like Nioxin shampoo which blocks DHT in the scalp (Finasteride is basically a DHT blocker) and a copper peptide serum if you want to boost results further. The earlier you start the better the results are going to be. If you've already lost most of it then there's only so much you can get back but if you start as soon as you notice visible thinning then you should have really good results as it will dramatically slow your losses while the new hair grows. [Have a look at some before/after pics to see what kind of results you get,](https://www.hairandskinscience.com.au/before-afters/) it's not night and day like a transplant but you'll get a lot back. My hair started thinning suddenly at a young age (thanks dad) and I'm about 7 sessions in and I can see *tons* of new hair growing (been checking with a mirror and a flashlight lol) and even though they're not fully grown yet you can't see my scalp through my hair at all anymore when before I started it was getting pretty bad. Very happy with how it's going so far.

timee_bot

View in your timezone: [5/5/21 19:00 UTC][0] [0]: https://timee.io/20210505T1900?tl=%F0%9F%92%8E%20Diamond%20Gains%20%F0%9F%92%8E%20%24DHT%20%7C%20Presale%205%2F5%2F21%2019%3A00%20UTC%20%7C%20BSC%20Gem%2C%20Frictionless%20Yield%20done%20in%20a%20unique%20way%20based%20on%20time%20held.%20Easy%20to%20see%20this%20having%20a%20huge%20run%20as%20it%E2%80%99s%20the%20first%20project%20to%20use%20this%20new%20reward%20system.

SenatusSPQR

So the main things that I know of, and keep in mind I'm not the most technical person, is that horizontal scaling is being talked about (https://forum.nano.org/t/horizontal-scaling/1502), as is vote stapling. Random sampling, DHT network overlays, vote storage/replay are methods that are mentioned that I genuinely don't understand well enough, but maybe your Googling skills are better than mine, haha.

kun1z

Those can already be used to attack the bitcoin network and it is not a problem. 1. A person can specify the nodes/IP's they want to connect to (whitelist). 2. A person can subscribe to a service that provides public blacklists. (this is how your ad blocker works in your internet browser) 3. VPN's and Proxy IP's are publicly listed, as well as most Tor exit nodes. Google them, you can ban them right now in your firewall. 4. Nodes auto-ban IP's that share malicious transactions. More reading: https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/95896/what-if-all-the-8-peers-of-the-node-are-malicious https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Weaknesses#Denial_of_Service_.28DoS.29_attacks For 11~ years everyone has tried to attack the bitcoin network and failed miserably. They've also tried to attack the bittorrent networks, DHT networks, ThePirateBay, etc, it's all meaningless. Decentralization was designed specifically, from the ground up, to prevent attacks. It's the whole point.

GroundbreakingLack78

Instructions unclear, sold at DHT.

wildgift

1. Yes 2. I really wanted something like this (basically, a DHT backend for apps, similar to couchdb). 3. I like the fact that sysadmins (are supposed to) get paid for hosting apps on their hardware. 4. Been meaning to learn Rust.

customsbytoy

Holochain is a good speculative coin, the concept is brillaint as blockchain is actually pretty inefficient and holochain’s aim is to create a new system using a DHT... very early stages but good investment assuming they can deliver

Eggy98

Wow! Dhedge has a 36m MC... Lets look at the comparison, you tell me which one is the potentially undervalued defi gem: Note that dext doesn't have Circ supply, which is only 8-10 million iFund for UNIFUND: From DEXTools: **$IFUND** * 1 ETH:**31251.36839233 iFUND** * Pool created:**10/2/2020 03:15** * Fully diluted Market Cap:**$1,966,012.35** * Total Supply:**36,809,279 iFUND** **VERSUS** $**DHT** * Market Cap: **$32,998,105.32** * Circ. Supply: **8,293,043.016 DHT** * 1 ETH: **419.1494332 DHT** * Pool created: **9/17/2020 13:04** * Fully diluted Market Cap: **$397,901,051.02** * Total Supply: **100,000,000 DHT**

Able-Coast-4900

OGN XDC STMX FRM DHT APY FRONT MTA to name a few

customsbytoy

Holo chain fixes a lot of these, ironically blockchain has some pretty significant design flaws, some of which Holo’s DHT system fixes

Qwahzi

Nano uses gossip-about-gossip message propagation, every node isn't sending messages to every other node for every transaction, and PRs are capped at 1000. One signature can vote for 12 transaction hashes at once, and a DHT network overlay + (replayable) vote storage is being researched to further improve transaction propagation and validation efficiency

TheTomiestTom

Alright I've learned my lesson, I've swapped my DHT dHEDGE coin for an even worse shitcoin!

TheTomiestTom

I have asked before but instead of getting downvoted, I'd like explanations why you don't like it. DHT dHEDGE : worth holding?

TheTomiestTom

Hello guys, it seems that most of us are in a bit of profit from the bullrun.... **I want to give crypto to friends**. Not huge amount as I didn't make life changing money, but not a smidge either. Free money is always good anyway. Here is my dilemma : where do I take this from to give them? I have failing coins and well performing coins : * \-Should I take the amount from well performing coins and risk to not let the amount withdrawn multiply (possibly)? * Or should I just sell my failing coins to avoid even more loss from those disappointments (for info : AVAX, CRV, 1INCH, DHT) (edit ; actually I believe in DHT it's an outsider that might soar one day I think)

thebongofamandabynes

The big bois mostly + a few alts that I think will do well (SNX, DHT, etc) No early retirement for me yet but I did find my potential moon shot (BNB). Got in early. Real early. So far, so good.