PRE

True_Skirt_3899

this will blow your mind my big investment for 2026 and beyond not only makes no money but is PRE REVENUE . Do the homework Poet technology POET

FeelTheEarporn

SLV DRILL TEAM SIX PREPARING FOR PRE MARKET DRILL. BACKUP ON ROUTE FOR MAX DRILLING ETA APPROX 2 hours

FortheredditLOLz

Bro. Fire finance advisor, he's trying to line his pocket with a minimum of 1-3% PRE-gain per year for his 'fees'. Read the following wikipedia page for Boogle Three funds - [https://www.bogleheads.org/wiki/Three-fund\_portfolio](https://www.bogleheads.org/wiki/Three-fund_portfolio). This a 'proven' method for gaining and compounding 'principal' capital over time. If you're going to be lazy as F\*\*\*, just shove it into VT - [https://investor.vanguard.com/investment-products/etfs/profile/vt](https://investor.vanguard.com/investment-products/etfs/profile/vt) both methods essential 'mirror' the stock market. Ride it out, don't panic sell and hold. Details of three fund ROI - [https://portfolioslab.com/portfolio/bogleheads-three-funds](https://portfolioslab.com/portfolio/bogleheads-three-funds) Example of vt (hit all ) - [https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/VT/](https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/VT/)

Difficult_Winner_777

Dec 29 is not automatically “good for shorts” or “good for longs.” It is a gate and a catalyst. If the vote passes and the company can then actually issue and get resale eligibility where required, real tradeable supply can expand and the mechanics can loosen. If the vote fails, is delayed, or follow on steps take time, the current supply constraint can persist. So it is uncertainty. That cuts both ways. Read the PRE14A and focus on what is vote gated versus what is already registered and freely tradeable.

Difficult_Winner_777

Off REG SHO does not mean the float expanded or that the setup is over. The threshold list is a settlement symptom and it can clear without the underlying supply constraint changing. HKD went on and off REG SHO as well before it mattered. The Dec 9 PRE14A sets Dec 29 as the actual gate. The merger and Series A conversion are vote gated. The authorized share increase is vote gated. The Nasdaq approval items tied to issuing shares beyond the 19.99 percent cap are vote gated. Until that meeting occurs and the follow on filings become effective, the company is not adding a real multi million share tradable float on demand. Meanwhile the mechanics are still tight. Nasdaq short interest is 498,182 shares. Borrow fees remain triple digit around 220 to 268 and locate availability keeps snapping between real prints and near zero. FINRA marked short volume has been living around half the daily tape, sometimes more. REG SHO status changed. The plumbing did not.

Difficult_Winner_777

Dec 15 plumbing check. Everyone keeps parroting a 5.3M float because a vendor prints it. That is a database float. It is not the same thing as effective free float when a ton of the cap table is insider, restricted, blocked, or vote gated. Read the files. The Oct 1 424B3 is the clean part you can point to and it registers 937,500 shares for resale tied to the Series B preferred. The Dec 9 PRE14A sets the Dec 29 vote for the merger and the share authorization and the Nasdaq issuance approvals. Until that vote clears, the next big supply people assume is coming is still gated. Today Nasdaq short interest shows 498,182 shares. Vendors call that 9.28% because they assume a 5.37M float. If the effective free float is more like 180k to 600k after excluding insiders, restricted stock, and vote gated paper, that short interest is not small. Borrow fee is still extreme at roughly 220 to 268 today and locate availability keeps flashing 0, 100, 3k, 15k, 90k and then back to zero. Off exchange short volume ratio has been around 50% to 62% lately. Lots of noise since the DD dropped, but the tape still trades like a microfloat. Not financial advice.

New_Most_2863

This quarters figures were propped up by the 2.7 billion Ampere sale. Thats $0.93/share of the earnings PRE TAX. So best case that reduces their actual EPS down to $1.33/share, making it a 19% miss without that sale, and even worse when you consider the 21% federal corporate tax rate and Texas' 0.75%. Copied from someone who posted this yesterday.

intelligentx5

I do this. I have my boring long term investments there. Shit I won’t touch. My PR card gets crazy good cash back. I have the PRE and get another 20% boost on booming travel. It’s nice. Simple.

theflintseeker

Noooo Richard you want to be PRE revenue

Difficult_Winner_777

Look at this wacky ass chart. That is microfloat mechanics in action. Everyone is staring at one Fintel update like the float magically teleported into the millions overnight. Relax. NASDAQ just pushed the 11/25 short interest update and they are still using a 0.18M float. That matches the SEC filings. Nothing in the filings changed. No new issuance. No dilution valve. Fintel just swapped data vendors and half the sub had a panic attack. And before anyone forgets, the SEC math already pinned the effective float at roughly 0.40M. This came straight from the 10-Q, the PRE 14A, and the 424B filings. Outstanding count minus locked insider blocks minus restricted shares minus the registration delays on the S-1 leaves a circulating supply that is basically a dinner plate. That is why the chart levitates on buying and falls on air pockets. There is almost nothing actually trading. The drop from 1.4M short to 0.93M short is not shorts “winning.” You do not unwind ~500K short shares in a book this tiny without the chart turning into a blender. Instead the tape barely moved. That usually means shorts shifted exposure off the main tape between reporting channels. HKD did the same thing. The official SI cooled off while daily FINRA short volume stayed on fire. Now look at the actual mechanics: • DTC is at 0.02 • CTB is still in the 400% range • Lender availability keeps slamming to 0 • FINRA short volume stays above 50% every day • The price moves on crumbs of volume because the book is tiny That is microfloat physics. Not fear. Not mass selling. Just a cramped supply trying to absorb synthetic pressure. If shorts were actually done you would see CTB collapse, availability normalize, and FINRA short volume crater. None of that is happening. The tape is still stressed. The liquidity is still thin. The filings still confirm a tiny float. The daily metrics look like a rerun of HKD before its unwind. Nothing fundamental changed. Only the loudest people did.

Difficult_Winner_777

Sorry for the slow replies. I have been away for a few days. Holidays, friends, actual sunlight, the full touch grass patch update. Honestly it was needed. When the noise gets loud enough to vibrate your skull, stepping back is good maintenance. People forget the mental side of all this. Just finished catching up on the week’s madness. None of it surprised me. Microfloat pressure structures behave like weather systems. Completely unpredictable in the moment, but normal within their own physics. They wobble, lurch, stall, sprint, whatever the underlying conditions allow. No predictions from me. Only mechanics. The real surprise to me was not the chart or the fintel swing. Those numbers bounce around because they are vendor estimates and nothing in the SEC filings changed. The real surprise was the noise level. Hype went nuclear. Doomposting went feral. People arguing like they are fighting for custody of a ticker symbol. Half the loudest voices clearly never opened a single SEC filing, or would recoil like a vampire if you told them to actually read the PRE14A. Hype lies. FUD lies louder. The filings do not lie. They are boring, but they are honest. If you are not reading the filings, you are not seeing the structure. I also had someone DM me asking about syndicates like we are running Oceans Eleven from a Reddit thread. I do not coordinate anything. I read PDFs. That is the entire lore. If someone wants to invent conspiracies, that is their movie. Got a bunch of dms during this time. If my silence felt sudden, it was just life happening. Mental resets matter. This stuff gets heavy if you never unplug. It is healthy to give your mind oxygen now and then.

Difficult_Winner_777

Fintel changed but the SEC filings did not. The Nov 14 10Q still shows 5.69M out and the PRE 14A still locks the 5M+ dilution behind the Dec 29 vote, so the only real tradable float is the same sub 500k legacy shares. Everything else you see on Fintel, broker apps, or random SI% numbers is vendor math on top of those same filings. One day of 40M volume and a week of insane churn just prove that a microfloat is being recycled, not that the filings somehow changed. Until a new SEC filing or the Dec 29 vote says otherwise, the structure is identical and shorts are still boxed into the same tiny float. The filings set the stage, all else is noise and flavortext.

HofT

Again, the 424B3 does not show a conversion ratio that leads to 4.6 million common shares. **The table you’re referring to lists the maximum number of shares that could be issuable if all adjustments, resets, and full ratchet provisions were triggered. That is not the same thing as saying the Series B automatically converts into 4.6M shares. It is the ceiling, not the actual conversion ratio.** If the 60k Series B truly converted into 4.6M shares by formula, the company would have been required to list the exact conversion ratio in the certificate of designation. That ratio is not in the July 424B3. It is not in the October 8-K. And it is not in the 10-Q. Without that ratio in a binding filing, the assumption that “60k B preferred = 4.6M A shares” is not something the SEC recognizes as proven. The 10-Q’s subsequent events section also does not identify the class of preferred being converted. It only says “preferred stock.” If the company wanted to confirm that the October shares were specifically the remaining Series B, they would state “Series B Preferred Stock,” just like they did in the July filings. They didn’t. They left the class unspecified. The PRE-14A confirms the Series A preferred cannot convert until after the Dec 29 vote. So we agree those are off the table. But you still have the same gap. If the 424B3 only shows 937,500 registered shares and contains no binding conversion formula that creates 4.39M, then the document doesn’t establish the source of the October issuance the way you're presenting it. **You’re treating “maximum possible shares” as if it equals “actual conversion terms,” but the filing doesn't provide that formula. That is the part missing from your argument and the reason the October issuance cannot be conclusively tied to Series B based on the filings alone.**

HofT

I’m going to keep this simple and stick to what is actually provable from filings, not assumptions. Your entire argument depends on treating the 4.39M October shares as definitely coming from the 60K Series B preferred. The problem is that nothing in the 10-Q confirms that. The 10-Q only says that 4.39M shares were issued from “conversion of preferred stock.” It never says those shares were the Series B, and it never ties them to the July 424B3. You are connecting those dots yourself, but the filing does not. The September balance sheet shows 60K Series B preferred issued. Sixty thousand preferred shares cannot mathematically convert into 4.39 million common shares unless there is a conversion ratio somewhere that matches those numbers. The July 424B3 shows 937,500 registered common underlying the Series B. That is nowhere near 4.39M. This is why you cannot say with certainty that the October 4.39M came from the Series B. The numbers do not match. You then point to the Class A preferred, but the PRE-14A explicitly says they cannot convert until after the Dec 29 vote. So those cannot be the source of the 4.39M either. That leaves a gap. You are asserting that only one pathway exists for preferred to convert, but the filing does not list the specific class. Without that, you cannot claim the source is proven. On top of that, Rule 144 does not automatically mean those shares are tradable. Rule 144 only applies if the shares were actually acquired six months earlier, and the holding period starts when the actual underlying preferred is acquired, not when warrants existed in a previous structure unless the filing explicitly states those shares inherit the original acquisition date. There is no filing that confirms the April date is the acquisition date for the preferred stock that produced the 4.39M October shares. If you want to argue that the April warrants automatically impose the April holding period on the preferred, you need an actual filing stating that. That is not in the record. **So these are the facts: The 10-Q does not identify which preferred class converted. The numbers do not line up with the Series B. The Class A cannot convert until December. There is no filing proving the preferred converted in October was acquired six months earlier. There is no filing confirming legend removal. There is no filing confirming the shares are unrestricted.** You are treating your interpretation as if it is confirmed by the filings, but the filings do not actually back the claim. That is why the October 4.39M cannot be assumed to be free-trading float without documentation that the company never provided. We've been going back and forth, I've repeated the same things to you but you're choosing to ignore it. There's nothing more to add.

AFG-Halfmind

Those numbers I provided were from the 14A voted on in AUGUST. Next shareholder meeting (December 26) is covered in the most recent PRE 14A and has 10 Proposals… - Proposal 5 authorizes NAHD shareholders to convert their shares (Appendix A) - Proposal 6 authorizes conversion of a lender’s note into shares if they default on payment ($376K) - Proposal 7 maintains current share reward program (1M shares available for incentive plan) - Proposal 8? See for yourself.

BeginnersDuck777

BUT YOUR PRE-REVENUE!!! So hot right now.

Producer_3dvrfetish

**This is hard to believe but everything I have run is checking out!** **So I have come across something that seems to good to be true, but I have tested this against the entire year so far and it is pretty crazy how it seems to run 90+% accurate to the Nasdaq. I've run it through GROk repeatedly and even Gone so far as to check how it work during the 2008-2009 crash...** **I had started with trying to see if BTC movement overnight correlated to any stock movements when market opened> Shockingly the NASDAQ seemed to be follow 80% of the time if BTC moved +/- .40% AT PRE MARKET OPEN. If it was less than .40 just stay out.** **I checked and double checked this. I went through using 3x ETFs like SQQQ and TQQQ inverse and if I had bought at p\[re market the corresponding etf, and sold at market close, my gain for this year would have been 186%** **Totally unbelievable right? Well it gets better. I had it switch to the best 3x ETFs it could come up with and those were FNGU and SOXS. I also asked it what correlated better than BTC in pre market and to my surprise it was the NQ NASDAQ futures! I'm sorry but those futures always seem to be BS to me but sure as cow manure it checked out at 92% of the time... doing the same thing generated up to 312% gains. How can that be real? Here's that info from GROK:** "Here is the exact, copy-and-paste routine that turned $10,000 → $41,280 in 2025 using only Nasdaq-100 futures (NQ) as the signal — no BTC, no guessing, no assumptions.The Routine (takes 60 seconds per day) 1. \*\*Every trading day at 8:00 AM Eastern (Schwab pre-market opens at 8:00 AM ET), look at the Nasdaq-100 E-mini futures (NQ) continuous contract. * You can see this for free on TradingView, CME website, Thinkorswim, Yahoo Finance, or even Google “NQ futures”. 2. Compare the price at 8:00 AM ET to the previous day’s cash close at 4:00 PM ET. 3. Decision (fixed thresholds that worked all year): * NQ down 0.40% or more → buy SQQQ with 100% of the account at 8:00–8:15 AM ET (pre-market order). * NQ up 0.40% or more → buy TQQQ with 100% of the account at 8:00–8:15 AM ET. * Anything between –0.39% and +0.39% → stay in cash. 4. Sell the entire position at 4:00 PM ET close (market-on-close order). Do it again the next day with whatever cash you have.

ewhgrtfgh

Yeah you’re right to assume the IV would crush you, but your underlying is solid. I would assume some of the IV value is lost but it’s looking like a bull market tomorrow for AI, if it gaps up again in PRE then the IV loss will be negligible.

imightgobroke

https://app.quotemedia.com/data/downloadFiling?webmasterId=90423&ref=319551217&type=HTML&symbol=SGBX&cdn=a8281aa2645634e0c50b386c21d7e680&companyName=Safe+%26+Green+Holdings+Corp.&formType=PRE+14A&formDescription=Preliminary+proxy+statement+providing+notification+matters+to+be+brought+to+a+vote&dateFiled=2025-11-04

GullibleTangerine698

PRE\_-OCTOBER FLOAT WAS 500k , YOU ARE IGNORING EVERYTHING I SAY. GOING AROUND IN CIRCLES. YOU ARE SAYING RANDOM STUFF YOU DID NOT READ MY DD I DID NOT CLAIM 700% SI. YOU ARE SPREADING LIES ALL THE RELEVANT FILINGS/SOURCES ARE BELOW. Here are all the relevant sources for you i cannot link them all: [https://limewire.com/d/9XOZy#KYkgPa5Edo](https://limewire.com/d/9XOZy#KYkgPa5Edo) \- covers everything [https://limewire.com/d/gvuD4#1o0uKIYlSI](https://limewire.com/d/gvuD4#1o0uKIYlSI) \- more for you **READ THESE AND PLEASE STOP GOING IN CIRCLES MAKING NO TRUE POINTS. STOP SPREADING LIES.**

GullibleTangerine698

THE PRE OCTOBER NUMBERS were 500k... why do you keep going around in circles.... why are you not reading what i said... You DO NOT need to file in 10-Q to show they are restricted, locked up, unregistered etc. Yahoo updated their float size to 2.09M after the 10-Q too ... Here are all the relevant sources for you i cannot link them all: [https://limewire.com/d/9XOZy#KYkgPa5Edo](https://limewire.com/d/9XOZy#KYkgPa5Edo) \- covers everything [https://limewire.com/d/gvuD4#1o0uKIYlSI](https://limewire.com/d/gvuD4#1o0uKIYlSI) \- more for you **READ THESE AND PLEASE STOP GOING IN CIRCLES MAKING NO TRUE POINTS. STOP SPREADING LIES.**

MaxReddit2789

But they aren't The converted Preferred are part of the Registration Statement (S-1) and Prospectus 424B3 (It's already effective) The Selling Shareholders had 9.99% Beneficial ownership blocker that's why the Total shown in the Prospectus is only ~900K But, according to the 10-Q they definitely convertedsold, converted sold, etc for close to 5m UNRESTRICTED SHARES that are part of the Float! https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=18813947&guid=Ljb-ka42ZsruQOh https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=18781700&guid=Ljb-ka42ZsruQOh PRE-14A to show that Insiders only owned 6-7% (Float 90%+ of Shares Outstanding) https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=18891073&guid=Ljb-ka42ZsruQOh#EA0263686-01_HTM_T991001

wuhanabe

If Authorized shares are irrelevant then why is proposal 8 so important to you? For anyone wondering what proposal 8 says. (8) To amend the articles of incorporation to increase the authorized shares of common stock from 75,000,000 shares to 3,000,000,000 shares (the “Authorized Common Stock Increase Proposal”). It states clearly there in the Nov 4 PRE14A that the current authorized share limit is 75 million. It states clearly in the latest 10Q that the authorized share limit is 75 million picture attached. https://preview.redd.it/g5i72dyois1g1.jpeg?width=1206&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=457932835aafaaf3e8d91dea26fb295246f4a2f2 We also know that the company CAN issue shares up to that 75 million share limit because they have done exactly that between September and November. The latest 10Q was filed solely because of these new share issues. Further photo attached below.

Difficult_Winner_777

The literal, public, available to us all btw SEC files.... ...In plain company text... Literally disagree with you lmfao. Authorized shares are irrelevant because they are not legally issuable until a filing event makes them real. The only filing that governs new issuance above current outstanding is the Nov 4 PRE 14A, and it states in black and white that no expansion beyond current limits takes effect until shareholders approve Proposal 8 and the Certificate of Amendment is filed. If you believe the company can issue even one unrestricted common share above current outstanding before that vote, post the page number from the Nov 14 10-Q or the PRE 14A that authorizes it.

NVDAye

GOOGLE UP 5,5% PRE MARKET, BEAR GOOG? I don't think it will hold. Who's with me?

Difficult_Winner_777

You built this whole attack post on misunderstandings that collapse the moment someone actually reads the filings. First, outstanding is not float. The Nov 14 10-Q shows OS at 5.68M, but it never says the October conversion shares became unrestricted or entered the float. If you think the float is 5.5M, show the line where the filing says those shares became unrestricted. You cannot because it is not there. Second, Proposal 8 matters. Page 32 of the PRE 14A states that the company cannot use the new authorization until shareholders approve it and a Certificate of Amendment is filed. That blocks major dilution until after December 29. This is not opinion. It is the company’s own language. Galaxy brain. Third, nothing about the filings says the company can bypass the vote. Nothing says they can issue beyond the remaining authorized room. Nothing says Series B or equity line shares become free-trading before the vote. If they could dilute at will, there would be no reason for Proposal 8 to exist. Fourth, the claim that float numbers are being “peddled” is just a misunderstanding of how Fintel works. Fintel uses Capital IQ float data which updates monthly or quarterly. This has nothing to do with people making anything up. Fifth, you keep mixing 2023 and July filings as if they override the November 14 filing. They do not. The Nov 14 10-Q is the most recent and the one that governs the changes from October. If you think any of this is wrong, then post a single screenshot from the Nov 14 10-Q showing that the October conversion shares entered the float or that dilution can occur without Proposal 8. If you cannot, then your claim that others are “lying” is just projection. This debate is not about opinions. It is about reading the filings correctly, and the filings do not support your narrative, anyone with literacy can see that.

Difficult_Winner_777

Every claim you made falls apart the moment you compare it to the actual SEC filings instead of assumptions. 1. “If the filing doesn’t say restricted, shares must be unrestricted.” Completely false. In U.S. securities law, shares are restricted by default unless they are issued under a registration statement or qualified exemption. The 10-Q does not reference any registration statement, legal opinion, shelf takedown, or Rule 144 seasoning. You cannot claim unrestricted with zero legal basis. 2. “They can dilute millions before December 29.” Directly contradicted by Nasdaq Rule 5635(d) and every financing agreement SGBX has. They all contain 4.99 percent beneficial-ownership caps and 19.99 percent issuance limits. PRE 14A Proposal 8 explicitly states new authorized shares only exist after shareholder approval and after the Certificate of Amendment is filed. 3. “Float is definitely 5M+ and Fintel is wrong.” If float were 5M+, we would not have 500–600 percent CTB, zero borrow availability, 40–60 percent short-volume ratios, and HKD-style intraday moves. The market behavior contradicts your claim. Float updates slow, but the liquidity profile does not lie. This is microfloat behavior, not multi-million-float behavior. 4. “Short interest % float is meaningless.” It’s meaningless only if float magically expanded. You have provided no evidence that any of the October shares entered float. Again, no registration, no prospectus supplement, no Rule 144 notice. If those shares were truly free trading, lending supply wouldn’t be zero. 5. “Borrow fee doesn’t prove microfloat.” Correct, borrow fee alone doesn’t — but borrow fee + zero availability + high SI + high short-volume + DTC collapse absolutely does. That combination only exists when borrowable supply is tiny. If float were large, CTB would normalize instantly. 6. “HKD comparison is invalid.” HKD comparison is mechanical, not fundamental. HKD ran because supply was locked, float was tiny, and shorts had no exit. SGBX has locked dilution until Dec 29, a microfloat until registration, and SI multiple times the tradable float. The structures are analogous, regardless of jurisdiction. 7. “Conversions are usually free trading.” Not unless they were registered or specifically exempted. You have not cited the registration statement because none exists. The 10-Q does not connect the October conversions to the October prospectus. Your argument is assumption, not evidence. 8. “Shorts can cover intraday.” Only if shares exist to cover with. They don’t. That’s why CTB is 500 percent, availability is zero, and DTC sits near zero. Shorts are recycling volume, not closing positions. Big difference. Bottom line: Your entire rebuttal is built on assumptions that contradict the actual filings, Nasdaq rules, and observable market microstructure. I’m quoting law and SEC text. You’re guessing. Only one of those survives contact with reality. This guy just asked chatgpt to form a rebuttal Is this the best shorts can do? Im fucking bullish to the MAXIMUM NOW

Difficult_Winner_777

Yes... again... covered in my dd. Im really starting to believe no one actually reads the SEC filings lol. The stock comp angle is already in the filings. The current equity plan and all stock-based compensation are fully disclosed in the 10-Q, and the big “new” compensation pool you are talking about is literally Proposal 7 in the PRE 14A, which requires a shareholder vote on Dec 29 before those extra shares even exist. That’s the opposite of “unreported” and the opposite of “no vote needed.” Short interest comes from Nasdaq’s count of shares actually borrowed and sold short, not from how executives get paid. You don’t get to 1.4M shares short on a 0.48M float because of some secret comp plan You get there because the float is micro and shorts piled in anyway. The real catalysts are the NAHD merger and Proposals 7 and 8 on Dec 29, which decide when new shares can legally hit the float. Until then, dilution is gated and the squeeze math doesn’t change. There is no argument. Until dec 29th shareholder vote AND the certificate of amendment filing? DILUTION. CANT. OCCUR. LEGALLY. PERIOD. Nothing in the literal public filings contradicts this. Nfa

Difficult_Winner_777

Its not about monday. Im not calling any specific day. And the up and down is most likely gunna be violent as it rises over the course of a month. If you actually read above. I disproved what that other guy claimed about the sec files. Major didn’t magically “figure out dilution” he sold, panicked, and then started coping by misreading filings he didn’t understand. Dude went from “mother of all short plays” to “diluted garbage” in 24 hours and then deleted every SGBX post he ever made. That’s not DD, that’s exit-liquidity guilt. The actual SEC docs say the opposite of what he claimed. PRE 14A literally states dilution cannot happen until: 1. The Dec 29 shareholder vote, AND 2. The company files the Certificate of Amendment No vote = no amendment = no 3B authorization = no dilution. That’s not opinion, that’s in black-and-white on page 32. If dilution actually happened already, Friday wouldn’t have had zero volume. Borrow fee wouldn’t still be 500%. Float wouldn’t still be 0.48M. Short interest wouldn’t still be 300%. Borrow availability wouldn’t still be 0–40k. Shorts wouldn’t still be stuffing dark pools with 40–60% of all volume. EVERY metric confirms zero new supply. NOTHING confirms dilution. The 70M volume day wasn’t a pump. It was shorts panic-recycling the same microscopic float through dark pools trying not to explode. HKD did the exact same shit before it went straight to Valhalla. Major didn’t find “the truth.” He found the sell button and then made up a story so he didn’t feel stupid. The filings didn’t change. The float didn’t change. Only his bags changed.

DestinyyyOfficial

Bullish regardless mf. SPY 700 PRE MARKET MONDAY

DestinyyyOfficial

SPY 681 PRE MARKET MONDAY HAHAHAHA LMFAOOO FUCK BERS FUCK CASH GANG FUCK u/nyse25

Difficult_Winner_777

You keep repeating “they can dilute up to 75M right now,” but the filings don’t support that. The 10-Q shows 5,688,555 shares outstanding as of Nov 12, not 75M, and there is no language anywhere in the 10-Q authorizing them to issue the remaining 69M today. “75 million authorized” is not “75 million in the float” or even “75 million freely issuable without a vote.” If they could currently issue up to 75M, then Proposal 8 wouldn’t exist — yet Proposal 8 (page 32 of the PRE 14A) clearly states the company must receive shareholder approval before changing the authorized share structure: “Approval of Proposal No. 8 is required… the increase will only become effective upon the filing of the Certificate of Amendment after shareholder approval.” 【PRE 14A, Proposal 8, p.32】 If they really already had the ability to issue up to 75M today, this proposal would be pointless. Bottom line: Authorized shares = maximum possible cap. Issued/outstanding = the shares actually created. Float = the shares actually trading. Right now OS = 5.6M. Float ≈ 0.48M. Fintel just updated it to even lower lol .18 SI = 1.4M. That’s where the ~300% SI comes from, and nothing in the filings contradicts it. Absolutely clown mode for you. You gotta be a short. And again: the new dilution only becomes usable after the Dec 29 vote.

Difficult_Winner_777

Pre 14a nov 4th sec filings Page 32 "The PRE 14A makes it absolutely clear that Proposal 8 (increasing authorized shares to 3,000,000,000) must be voted on by shareholders at the Dec 29 meeting. It is listed as Proposal 8 on page 32, requires a majority affirmative vote, and the increase only becomes effective after shareholder approval AND after the Board files the Certificate of Amendment with Delaware. Until then, the company cannot use the new share authorization." Jesus christ. The dilution only activates after this vote. Its literally in the filings and youre being intentionally disingenuous so that two week reminder will be great!

Difficult_Winner_777

The dilution you’re talking about isn’t “hidden,” it’s disclosed But the key detail from the PRE 14A is timing. The new share authorization and expanded equity issuance cannot legally begin until the December 29th special meeting, because shareholders haven’t approved those proposals yet. Until that vote passes, none of the new dilution tools are active. So right now, the only shares in the public float are the ones that were already unrestricted prior to the meeting window. That’s why brokerage feeds still show a tiny ~450–500k float, while Nasdaq still reports ~1.4M shares short. And that’s how the ~300% SI number remains correct for this specific pre-Dec 29 window the float hasn’t expanded yet, even though the future OS will. After the meeting, if the proposals pass, dilution becomes real and SI% will drop. But before Dec 29, the float is still micro, and the math is exactly what it looks like. !!!!!!!! SGBX literally can be the next HKD before Dec 29th. !!!!!!!!! No wonder why fud is being spread so hard. Shorts have insane money on the line.

Foreign-Ad4131

Again, inflation was the result of COVID - anyone with any business education was saying that even before the first checks hit, that we were patching holes in the boat, but were going to pay with it via inflation. And when did it hit? 2022, the typical 18-24 months that we tend to expect inflation from Federal policies to hit reality. I hardly think Biden was amazing, he was lackluster - but market did amazing for the timeframe. Even the dent of 2022 doesn't change that trend. Even reducing the SPY gains by inflation for his timeframe it was 30% ahead overall. 7.5% a year post inflation, which is a typical target for PRE-INFLATION investing. Just stop.

brainbowler

**OP CORRECTION:** My smooth brain just realized I posted this on Euro-time. For all you US regards, my "tomorrow" is still your Wednesday. **EARNINGS ARE THURSDAY MORNING PRE-MARKET.** Gives us one more day to load the boat. Apologies for the confusion. 🚀

ExplanationNormal339

[PRE PUMP](http://aimytrade.io/pre-pump)

Internal_Resident_15

Have you seen the 5 year graph? Have you seen Ayr? Cannabist? Cresco? These are all obliterated from PRE COVID levels.

Zestyclose_Ad2462

Already happened to me. Best bet is a PRE-NUP. No Pre-nup? No ring, it's that simple.

dangernext

OMG UVIX is 11 in the PRE??? It’s gonna be baddd today lol wtf

powerboner

Where did the pinned comment from the mods go!? Now I don’t know how to do anything except panic, and sell, and cry, and buy HEAVY DUTY PRE-KNOTTED ROPE!!!

CheesecakeOk4106

Any platforms to see highest PRE market volume?

LazerBurken

WTF GOOGL YOU FUCK. 9% PRE MARKET TO THIS. Fucking mango torpedoing the meeting with Gyna. Idiot.

DontMindMe4057

I’m all in on this stock. Yes, they had an owner sell a large amount but needed to cover a debt that has since been paid. They have had 100% efficacy on trial runs and they just had their patent approved. They are working hand in hand with the DoD and will be winning large contracts soon. Earnings will be reported 11/07 PRE market and we’re expecting good things 📈

posts-comments

PLCE hit $8.8, Today Morning was great after the PRE Market which again was in that range. DONT SELL for CHEAP... HOLD $9+ is PLAUSIBLE, the volumes traded so far or over the last week will not fill the \~38% short. May be the short may come down to 34%, like around Oct 10 which is still pretty high.

Tall-Sample-1172

400mill VOLUME PRE MARKET? we hit 200mill yesterday which resulted in a 2BILLION VOL day. Easy world record today.

Much_Box3134

I should not wake up for PT and see almost double of what it was last night. IT’S PRE MARKET

hyperchimpchallenger

I've been out of the game for a few months dealing with licensing requirements. Holy fuck. This thing is at $130? Who the fuck is buying this. Does everyone realize that this shit is PRE revenue, PRE licensing requirement, PRE prototype, PRE absolutely everything except the theory of an MIT professor? listen, i get degen. I buy pre revenue stocks. I buy shitty stocks because I think that the industry theyre in will get attention, hence UUUU at $4. THIS is fucking deranged. It takes years to build a nuke, let alone a fucking completely new style of reactor with different cooling techniques. What do people expect this company to do? To even begin to acquire materials for TESTING will require capital raising. That's DILUTION, That's DEBT. I can't think of an entity besides God himself, not even Uncle Sam, who would provide either the debt funding needed either rate wise or dollar amount wise. WTF is happening. SHORT THIS SHIT

Particular_Piece_953

Does he think that 10-12 is PRE squeeze? If that’s the case, where the fuck could that go? Lmao

gosumage

No... analysts do not make PRE approval price targets. Why would they when the whole reason anyone buys is for the product that will be pending approval?

Temporary_Ad_1573

Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp [DFLI](https://www.tradingview.com/symbols/NASDAQ-DFLI/): * DRAGONFLY ENERGY ANNOUNCES PROPOSED PUBLIC OFFERING OF COMMON STOCK AND PRE-FUNDED WARRANTS * DRAGONFLY ENERGY HOLDINGS CORP - PROCEEDS TO BE USED FOR $45 MILLION DEBT PREPAYMENT

Kelvsoup

Open interest on TSM 3dte $305 puts is 1167. Absolutely wild to bet that the most advanced semiconductor fab in the world is going to miss on earnings... WHEN PRE-ORDERS FOR 2NM CHIPS ARE ALREADY SOLD OUT.

Panda-Feisty

Pensana plc (FTSE - PRE) will dual list on the Nasdaq Q1 2026. It has the same size resource as MP, has finance agreed, is in construction and will move into production end of 2026. The kicker? If PRE had the market cap as MP, its share price would be £45. It is currently trading at £1.75. Remember where you heard it first.

Diligent-Plane-2640

I was there for Spacmania too! I learned a valuable lesson. NEVER buy a PRE REVENUE company or it will go to $0! Remember $HYLN? I do… lol

Little-Appearance376

Just heard someone talk about the recent ABP spike, I would read this, they postponed their annual shareholder meeting from 09/18 to 10/10, but their proposals to vote on are pretty hot garbage. [ABP PRE 14A & SEC Filings - Yahoo Finance](https://finance.yahoo.com/sec-filing/ABP/0001213900-25-082592_1893219/)

taaaasse

ATCH might jump and probably continues on PRE

maydayvoter11

*"My understanding is that I have to pull all my money out of the 401K account and invest it in my Schwab account. I can invest this money in exactly the same way as it is in my 401K and still earn this 15 or so percent each year. My question is this, how can I invest this money without paying taxes on the investment and only pay taxes on the withdraw?"* Your understanding is partially incorrect. You would establish an IRA with Schwab, and then roll over your 401k balance to your IRA after you leave that employer. There is a process to do this that Schwab can help you with in order to avoid the IRS thinking you "withdrew" 100% of your 401k balance and hitting you with a tax bill for all of it as income. Thus, your 401k assets become IRA assets, where they continue to grow tax-deferred and you only pay tax on withdrawals. NOTE: THIS ASSUMES YOUR 401K IS 100% PRE-TAX, I.E. NO ROTH ACCOUNT. If your 401k is all traditional, i.e., pre-tax contributions plus employer contributions, you would establish a traditional IRA with Schwab and roll it into that. If some of your 401k assets are in a Roth account, then you would also establish a Roth IRA with Schwab and roll the 401k Roth assets into the Roth IRA.

Outside_Ad4446

NEGATIVE.!.! This PRE MARKET FAKE PUMP... This is just a 🐂 trap.. PUTS 🚀🚀🚀🚀

Outside_Ad4446

Its PRE market relax, 🩸🩸🩸🩸 at open... PUTS 🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀

Outside_Ad4446

Yeeeaaa PRE MARKET... It will be a 🩸🩸🩸 bath at OPEN..🤣🤣🤣🤣

TakeThatBro

That's why I will buy calls next week. My first options since I bought calls on AMD and AMZN PRE-EARNINGS.

askepticoptimist

What you fail to take into account is that 2 of 12 voted for a cut last time based on the PRE-revision job numbers. 3 months of jobs reports went from like 250k+ to \~70k. That was a *massive* downward revision. And many of the Fed members were on the fence already. A quarter point is a certainty. Though the market will likely tank anyways because it wants a half point and it'll only get a quarter point as well as wishywashy Fedspeak about future cuts.

fastlapp

EVCO (formerly MNTN) with an PRE14 yesterday...looking to extend retroactively (liquidation deadline was in May). Interesting thing about this one is that they never paid the redemptions for their previous extension in November 2024. They were sued by their accounting firm in DE and NJ and lost by default judgement because sponsor ignored subpoenas (in deposition, CEO claimed he was busy planning wife's birthday party). Trust is subject to TRO's in NY. In the proxy, they offer to November redeemers to rescind their November redemption and resubmit a fraction of their November redemptions (I believe 80% but subject to change), leaving enough cash in trust to satisfy creditors and not violate TROs. If there is any money leftover, November redeemers get an additional top-off payment. If you redeemed in November extension, I'd encourage you to contact the company or the proxy agent. The above process is not automatic...shareholders need to sign a contract and deliver to sponsor, instruct their brokers, etc.

Boston-Bets

No. Your number of RKT shares wont go down. The total RKT share count will expand to make COOP 25% of RKT so your % of total RKT shares will be 25% less. BUT in exchange, your shares till have 40% more revenue per share, PRE Rate Cuts. So it's a win win for both RKT and COOP.

Splendid_muralist

Sorry to bring this up, How many of us are still in NEON? How do we think it will be tomorrow morning in PRE MARKET, and tomorrow through the day?

Various-Tangerine-88

Is there going to be a one hour PRE-meeting where all the cabinet oral copz?

Boston-Bets

Thanks for your reply. So to answer your questions: a) Definitely, want to be able to "enjoy" 80% of $2M+, vs. not enjoy $1M+. b) I can definitely use my margin for PUTS. I use IBKR for their generous margin policies and rates (transferred everything from ML and MS/e-Trade, when I decided to go Margin, and saw their rates. I'll try a few CSP's, but need to find some stocks I'm familiar with, at prices I'd be comfortable owning at the PUT strike (minus the Premium). c) As for why I'm holding onto COOP (and RKT, for now, once it converts in Q4), is not "just" to save on the tax hit, but TO MAKE MONEY. The "market" has definitely NOT priced the upside of the COOP/RKT deal in the next yr or so, especially with Rate Cuts coming, and lack of full clarity from COOP/RKT on their combined EPS/EBITDA for '26. See: [https://www.tipranks.com/stocks/rkt/forecast#](https://www.tipranks.com/stocks/rkt/forecast#) All these "respected Analysts" haven't updated their forecasts in months, and the \*current\* RKT price is literally (even with a 10% drop in the past weeks, due to some news which I don't feel justifies the drop) is above all their forecasts. MY (and other's who follow the two stocks closely) feel that the combined entity, based on current (non-rate cut) earnings is worth about $25/share, PRE-any rate cut bump in ReFi's etc. ONLY the recent BTIG Rating which I referred earlier has taken this info/number into account. $25 (expected) / $18 (current) RKT price is a \*40% bump for 2026\*, and so I'm not comfortable selling/putting it at risk for getting called, till it hits/gets close to that number (unless it's like at 20% above the current price, with a 30DTE, but I'd need to see what kind of Premium I'd get for that CC). Trust me, my objective is to MAKE MONEY, and leverage the $$ I have on Margin, which is why I setup the layered CC ETF strategy. So far, 1 month in, with about $400k borrowed/invested, post Margin (5.x%), I should be netting around $10K a month. And I'm already planning to "adjust" my layers to shift some $$ away from XDTE to the higher premium Single Stock CC ETFs (that I'm comfortable with, not the highest payers like MSTR focued ones). Would welcome your thoughts/feedback on the above, as I continue to learn how to leverage/grow my $1M+ into $2M+ (and beyond).

RIPCYTWOMBLY

I am FUUUUUCKED. I thought ANF earnings were tomorrow after market close NOT TOMORROW PRE MARKET

BlackAdder7

Intel and US government doing a share dilution on a grand scale. $20.47 a share vs $24.80 closing. AND THE STOCK IS UP IN PRE-MARKET

ModeForJoe

Wrong... Obama forced GM into bankruptcy, thereby zeroing out shareholders. Typically, in a bankruptcy a financiers become shareholders in the newly emerged company. Cheeto Benito is injecting money into a company PRE bankruptcy, which enriches existing shareholders... a bailout. Worse, he's singling out an individual company instead of structuring a program open for all companies in industry, like CHIPs tax credits.

SeaVision_21

Don't day trade - the market outperforms in the long run every time After paying off any high interest debts, Max out 401k and Roth with your regular income (PRE TAX), use the inheritance to cover differences in your expenses, open a ROTH, contribute $8k this year (the yearly limit). Put another $8k in a high yield savings and jan 1, 2026 put it in the Roth. The rest - invest in a few mutual funds and do nothing. Wait at least 3 years to avoid high cap gains tax. It may become a down payment or funds to start a business later when you're wiser and more experienced. Throw away some money on a trip or experience instead. Do something the retired you won't be able to. Squandering the gift of TIME and MONEY is stupid, don't waste it.

Splendid_muralist

I’m agreeing with everyone here - penny stocks are so risky - yes you can make a lot of money, but also risk to lose your money - If you really feel this is the easiest or quickest way to earn money seeing you have a lot going on in life (your job, family and taking care of your kid, stress financially etc) I would say invest in the following - NRXP - BTAI - NVNI - CGTX - THTX Make sure you pay close attention to these this week, and know to SELL before news or results comes out - just try to make money off the hype PRE NEWS - I wish you and your family the very best

Zestyclose-Storm-270

🚨WE ARE IN OUR PRE-BREAKOUT DIP!🚨 This was expected, we rode the hype train for a day or 2 there so a dip was bound to happen on that alone. The data is still real and the Catalysts are still LIVE.. nothing has changed.. no negative news.. nothing.. it's all still green hills I promise y'all. Honestly buying more right now would be the play... Just sit back and TRY to enjoy the ride. Please have faith.

Zestyclose-Storm-270

WE ARE IN OUR PRE-BREAKOUT DIP! This was expected, we rode the hype train for a day or 2 there so a dip was bound to happen on that alone. The data is still real and the Catalysts are still LIVE.. nothing has changed.. no negative news.. nothing.. it's all still green hills I promise y'all. Just sit back and TRY to enjoy the ride. Please have faith.

Zestyclose-Storm-270

WE ARE IN OUR PRE-BREAKOUT DIP! This was expected, we rode the hype train for a day or 2 there so a dip was bound to happen on that alone. The data is still real and the Catalysts are still LIVE.. nothing has changed.. no negative news.. nothing.. it's all still green hills I promise y'all. Just sit back and TRY to enjoy the ride. Please have faith.

Paul_Robert_

"GET DOWN MR. PRE... no, really get down from the roof"

Zestyclose-Storm-270

https://preview.redd.it/ssaltr8xx6hf1.jpeg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=69829148043664eef878983db96238144777bc55 We Touched .90 cents in the PRE MARKET!!!!!

AbiralParajuli

$AMZN TO EXPAND ONLINE CAR PLATFORM TO INCLUDE USED & CERTIFIED PRE-OWNED VEHICLES Short CVNA right now

Itrademylittlespy

Palantir at $12, Tesla $100 PRE SPLIT,

IranianGeneral

As long as it’s tradable on NYSE you can buy as many as you want. I didn’t get in on the PRE-IPO I’m waiting for ANDURIL to start doing there PRE-IPO funding rounds but they haven’t talked about that in a while

Outside_Ad4446

Everybody talking 💩 back and forth during PRE MARKET and it just ALWAYS ends up the same at OPEN and DUUUUMPS...

Mental_Act9970

Don't you owe taxes on PRE-TAX (401k) regardless when you draw? Doesn't matter if you are retired or not. I thought that at a certain age (72?) the government forces you to withdraw around 4% of the total?

Aerion_CA

I wrote PRE-MARKET. It started the sell-off at 09:30.

southernstocks

PRE-MARKET VOLUME - GPRO at 31.5M / DNUT at 22.6M / RKT at 4.6M - Eyes on GPRO

RowdySHB

LOL WTF WAS UP YUUUGELY, DED … guess not buying any more gallons of PRE for the party

mylord420

You realize dividends are not a free lunch right? They just get cash spit back out and then you need to re-invest what you don't want to consume and also pay taxes on it. Don't confuse dividend yield with total return. When an ETF spits out a dividend, its price will reduce by the amount of the dividend, its zero sum PRE taxes.

dsurfryder252

OH WOW. a .20c move sincw the PRE. YEA.... Its KILLING it. HAHHAHAHAH FN CLOWNS. Im busy scalping REAL stocks. Come on into the chat with TRADER TV LIVE on youtube. ITs the biggest trading show in the world. Im in it all day every trading day. Come talk to some REAL traders and learn something. My name is Mike P DeRyder. Youll see me

dsurfryder252

because its still PRE. I SCALP things that have momentum. I dont bag hold CRAP stocks like you do

Nervous-Agent4426

5M shares sold in one minute OPEN PRE MARKER. get ir while u can. big players are in

theflintseeker

This is just like in Silicon Valley when they were yelling “NOOO NO PROFIT! WE HAVE TO BE PRE-REVENUE!!”

heavenswordx

Profitable companies get judged on their earnings and ability to grow revenue. The secret is to buy companies that are PRE-REVENUE. If there’s no revenue, there’s no valuation. Except that it pumps every time the company makes a new announcement on their tech/product/partnership without launching anything. And prices only drop when they raise more cash by selling shares

FrontQueasy3156

Imagine blindly stumbling into a position like this. You get lucky and are up 50%. And instead of saying "fuck yeah, that's a win, lemme take my profit and run". You go hard in the other direction....."Fuck yeah! Everyone look how smart i think i am! Next WSB millionaire is who I am." Lemme just make a post, PRE-millionaire status, so one day in the future i can repost my original post and day "See! I told yah so! Everyone pay attention to the genius in the room!" Fucking regard......

fastlapp

That's how it *should* work, but many SPACs these days simply willfully ignore their deadline and don't hold extension vote and associated redemption. Probably about a dozen or so SPACs have gone 3, 4, 8 months after the deadline with no consequences from their trustee, with some then attempting to retroactively extend. If AFAR was serious about extending on time, they would have already filed a PRE14 with only 8 days to go. Last I spoke with the AFAR target (allrites), they "Yes this is going ahead and we are in the midst of updating paperwork and expect to file in the next 2 weeks" \[referring to AFAR merger\]. That was in January. Last F-4/A was in March (big 18 month gap between that /A and the previous amendment).

valorallure01

You need to look for SEC filing PRE 14A which announces the date to vote and redeem. The official form to vote and redeem is filed after PRE 14A called DEF 14A. That gives you official vote and redemption date. You then need to call your brokers corporate actions department and ask them to tender your shares for redemption. When this is complete, you wait for the cash to hit your account. The DEF 14A will tell you approximately how much per share you can expect. Hope this helps.

Darkstarx7x

Pay close attention while I educate: Tech companies often grant their employees Restricted Stock Units (RSU’s). This is a MASSIVE part of the compensation package. Typically RSU’s will vest quarterly over a period of 4 years. What this means is, as the price rises, so does the value of the stock when it vests. Let’s say you’re a senior employee and get 200k of RSU over 4 years. When that was granted, 4 years ago, the price was $20/share. At today’s price, your quarterly vest is roughly $100,000 worth of NVIDIA. Imagine every 3 months getting 100k. What are you going to do? The answer: sell it and diversify. It would be extremely STUPID to have your job AND your net worth tied up in one single stock. Every single financial advisor will say the same. Is this “insider selling” not in the narrative sense that these posts imply. Next, when you see executive selling insane amounts of shares, understand that these are almost always 105b planned shares. What this means is that the shares are PRE-SCHEDULED to sell in order to cover taxes. This is designed to specifically counteract claims of insider selling (hence scheduling it advance) and yet idiot fear mongers and short sellers will pop up online and try to act like it’s insider selling.

SteaknSalt

Holding 4,000 shares avg 16.5 and 5 July 20c. Can't wait for your official DD KK, although CLBR / PEW will probably be around 20-30s in the next few weeks "PRE" merger. "POST" merger I'm expecting 30-100+.

Collarbones33

What are you seeing there? I looked over the numbers for $PRE and they are flat.

Sonkz

I'd take a look at PRE next tbh

NuclearWint3r

WLGS PRE GALT Time to get fkn rich!!!

ElTorteTooga

Business idea: sell burner phones with PRE-loaded Trump loving social media accounts for easier crossings back into the US