Reddit Posts
Vital Energy $VUX has “more than doubled production” Operational Netbacks are high 900 BOE/D production + higher oil prices of $100 WTI now!
Vital Energy $VUX has “more than doubled production” but the market hasn’t noticed this yet – it was not yet in financials. Easy cashflow, more growth potential and a future stock multibagger using Q4 2021 numbers financials and 900 BOE/D production + higher oil prices of $100 WTI today
Vital Energy $VUX has “more than doubled production” but the market hasn’t noticed this yet – it was not yet in financials. Easy cashflow, more growth potential and a future stock multibagger using Q4 2021 numbers financials and 900 BOE/D production + higher oil prices of $100 WTI today
Vital Energy $VUX has “more than doubled production” but the market hasn’t noticed this yet – it was not yet in financials. Easy cashflow, more growth potential and a future stock multibagger using Q4 2021 numbers financials and 900 BOE/D production + higher oil prices of $100 WTI today
Anyone who does daily IWC or Microcap Index Reviews? (USA)
The beginning of the end for micro-cap (maybe). $200k IWC short.
Mentions
For that price Omega or IWC. People who think expensive watch buyers are insecure are insecure themselves.
Small caps are hot. Nobody seemed to notice IWM, small cap index hit a record high today. IWC mirco caps did as well. S&P didn't.
Broadly priced in. The past six months the Russell 1000 and 2000 are up 25%ish. The IWC microcap ETF is up 43%. No doubt if rates do go down another .5% the next couple months that will help too, but microcaps in general have already rallied decently. Some individual stock opportunities must still exist of course.
We’ll run til March or April.. IWM, IWC, and regional is done. Big indices and precious commodities will run. I’m shorting gold over the weekend. Let’s see…
Everyone, buy up WOLF. I’m trynna buy myself a IWC Portuguiser green dial 41mm on leather strap
About a decade older than 18. I got my first house in my mid 20’s. Hit 100k in my portfolio first time in my early 20’s. Married early 20’s. Got into Solana and other alt coins 2021/2022, made so much money from Solana I took a week off work to do some of the richest things I’ve done in my life with my wife. I couldn’t care less about the price of anything, flights, hotels, experiences, upgrades to first class or fast passes at Disney. Good fucking times. Once I blew most of the Solana money I bought several watches like Rolex, zenith, IWC, Hamilton, Cartier Tank, grand seikos, Pepsi dial Rolex my favorite, so many more. Since I work in commissioned sales, I can gladly tell people to fuck off, I couldn’t care less if I’m making the sale or not, I check my phone and see my stocks are up $7k past 24hrs or my crypto is up $3k past 24hrs, meanwhile I make 70-120k a year depending on commission. My coworkers hate that I don’t care anymore. They hate my new house and new cars and watches, but I still buy them all breakfast and sometimes lunch just as a nice gesture, they’re eating my food I provided for them. Discovering stocks like AMD and FAANG in the 2010s set me the fuck up. Only thing I regret is putting too much as a down payment for my cars and mortgage. I wish I would’ve put less money down and put it into NVDA or Solana instead. If I did that, I’d honestly be buying small businesses/commercial real estate, or I would rent a penthouse in NYC, retire, set a couple hundred thousand aside for my rent for the next 20-30 years, and just browse the city daily Willy nilly with my family.
IWC course is a joke. It’s a complete waste of time and money. They only sell puts in that discord. If you don’t have at least $100k in unwanted cash laying around, you won’t be able to make any trades in that discord.
IWC is exactly a discord full of rocket emoji. “I told you FAM, stock XYZ will recover!” when everyone already lost money on his trades. And that’s the guy who told everyone to trade without any stop losses or you will be constantly losing money. What a clown.
’ve been in IWC for over a year now. Not once have I felt “scammed.” Are there bad trades? Yes. That’s part of the game. But the amount I’ve learned about market structure, options flow, and macroeconomics has changed how I approach investing completely.
I’ve been in IWC for over a year now. Not once have I felt “scammed.” Are there bad trades? Yes. That’s part of the game. But the amount I’ve learned about market structure, options flow, and macroeconomics has changed how I approach investing completely.
They’re good watches. I prefer Cartier style over IWC. Cartier is not as good mechanically, but who cares. You’re surrounded by about 5 clocks at any given time of the day.
Any opinions on IWC watches?
We all make mistakes in the market. I am still profitable, and that’s the most important thing. Anyway, the purpose of this post was to keep people away from falling into this IWC trap, not to grieve about paying someone $4500. There are many retirees in the discord who have no clue about how to trade options and how the market works. This guy Corey clearly takes advantage of them, and I want this to stop.
Yes, the CBOE Volatility Index, or the "VIX" is a market indicator that generally tracks market sentiment and volitility. Often it will spike up during major events that trigger sell offs. It had a large spike at the end of December, which was followed by a downtrend in the small caps we follow here. So it's good to keep an eye on that, and other general market indicators, like the DOW, S&P, and ETFs like QQQ to do a risk assessment before buying any stock, but especially penny stocks, which are very volatile. I have a watch list just called "Market behavior", which includies DJI/DOW, SPY, TLT, the VIX, QQQ, and IWM / IWC.
Stop holding stocks that have pumped over 100%. Look at the Dilution Tracker reports. Recognize when the low cap market, and market in general is overbought. IWC is an ETF to track that in place of a true "Penny index" Keep an eye on the VIX, if it spikes hard, like it did today, you probably want to go liquid for a few days at least.
I just got a gold IWC watch, so I believe that I am safe enough
After a great December and terrible January, I'm going to start basing my trading around when the IWC is overbought or oversold.
neither, Rolex is for dilettantes and anything DJT is for gards Grand Seiko, Breitling, A. Lange Sohne, IWC are the kinds of brands you want.
Can someone pick apart this trade? I'm simulating a trade as a newb, but probability and greeks all show zero in active trader pro. I was using [optionsprofitcalculator.com](http://optionsprofitcalculator.com), but it has become flaky and changes the ticker when I hit go. I'm basing this trade mainly off the weekly chart with a weak practical knowledge. of options. I'm collecting some tickers and position ideas as non options guy. I went through the OIC course and have been reading a lot, and while all the knowledge is simmering in my head, I don't understand my platform feedback when I look at the stats for the trade. IWC - $119 Buy Oct 18 put @ $118 Sell Oct 18 put @ 105 I wish [optionsprofitcalculator.com](http://optionsprofitcalculator.com) didn't flake on me, as that seemed to give me info I could chew on. Supprised that the actual trading platform seems odd.
**Basic Stats** * Institutional Owners: 22 total, 22 long only, 0 short only, 0 long/short - change of -31.25% MRQ * Shares Outstanding 6,348,624 shares (source: Capital IQ) **Institutional Owners** From Fintel (edited) * INTRACOASTAL CAPITAL, LLC : 174,054 * Hare Joshua: 1,084,888 * ARMISTICE CAPITAL, LLC: 1,836,000 * FSMAX - Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund : 4,309 * FNCMX - Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index Fund: 500 * FCFMX - Fidelity Series Total Market Index Fund: 641 * FSKAX - Fidelity Total Market Index Fund 3,345 * VEXMX - Vanguard Extended Market Index Fund Investor Shares: 6,509 * VTSMX - Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Investor Shares: 17,623 * IWC - iShares Micro-Cap ETF: 1,044 * Tower Research Capital LLC (TRC) 2,595 * Creative Planning 10,933 BlackRock Inc.: 11,141 * Wells Fargo & Company/mn 471 * Vanguard Group Inc : 24,132 * Jpmorgan Chase & Co: 129 * Pnc Financial Services Group, Inc.: 297
IWC is up almost 20% in the last 5 as well... fishy fishy
IWC is another etf that is printing money right now Ur welcome 
iShares Microcap ETF (IWC) or First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM) probably. They mostly seem to stay under your $3B limit.
IWC's largest holding is MOD which has a market cap of $5b. The stock quintupled this year. Next biggest is CleanSpark at $4.33b, up 600% this year. So mostly they meet your criteria. SQLV's largest holding has a market cap of $3.34b.
I see that logic IVV = .03% IJK = .17% IJR = .06 IWC = .60 While ITOT is .03% Do you think ITOT is to heavily weighted to large cap and not enough mid/small cap?
Agreed. Historically cheap to the S&P. IWM, IWC, VBR. I’d take these over the index in a heartbeat. What keeps me away is the general negative outlook imo for equities. In that case, I don’t think the favorable valuation saves small caps. I think if the market goes down, it takes small caps down even further with it. Right?
Look at IWC, smaller companies.
Just watch small/mid cap etf. Real reversal comes when the little guys and equal weight S&P start moving (IWC, IWM, RSP). Till then a bounce in QQQ/SPY might be short lived.
Check out IWC, iShares Micro-Cap ETF. Note that average trading volume is very low, less than 30K.
What you’re looking for is a microcap fund. iShares has a good one with IWC, but the expense ratio is a bit high for an index fund. That’s most likely going to be par for course with most microcap funds though.
I'd be just fine with a nice Omega, an IWC, or a Hublot. They are essentially in that same range too
—-^^Largest shareholders include Vanguard Group Inc, VTSMX - Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Investor Shares, BlackRock Inc., VEXMX - Vanguard Extended Market Index Fund Investor Shares, Geode Capital Management, Llc, Natixis, FSMAX - Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund, Morgan Stanley, State Street Corp, and IWC
#BEARS G SHOCK #BULLS OMEGA SEAMASTER 300m or IWC
Microcap funds are not very popular and have very low liquidity and small net asset values. The most liquid one that I'm aware is an iShares product - $IWC. There is also a CEF - $RMT from Royce.
AUD/USD being green is a decent sign for bulls but IWC is making new lows
I am tired of fancy mechanical watches anyway Just got my IWC Mark VII Heritage and Rolex Polar Explorer II serviced. Could have bought a cheap Longines watch with the money they charged me for service/maintenance
I mean, just look at the chart . There's also reported short interest and inclusion in heavily manipulated ETFs like IWC
Would do the same. Currently looking at the IWC Mark XX with green dial.
VTI should have some small portion of even the smallest of microcaps (like the ones in IWC). It had TSLA all along, while VOO did only recently, contributing to slight outperformance of VTI
noice I have IWC Mark XVIII Heritage as my casual watch. IWC make quality piece
IWC is solid. If you want a ton of watch for the money, look at preowned Zenith’s. Incredible amount of watch for the money
Nice. I’m looking at some vintage IWC’s
First watch I bought was a IWC compass titan it cost around a third of the profit from one trade wait until you make a substantial profit otherwise you will have regrets
I love IWC but only real watch guys know it. I could add it at one point
Yes they are in the ultra luxury price range and will no doubt draw the eyes of watch enthusiasts, but if you buy a piece from IWC instead you'll get an exquisite watch and still have enough money left over to buy a fucking pony so there's that
Nice watch mate that thing is essentially bulletproof I am rocking my IWC 3511 compass titan
misc.invest.misc:55258 9 May 2017 To make money investing, buy low, compound, sell high, not as easy as it sounds. Prices are low precisely when noone has money to invest, including you. Then transaction costs can take as much as a third of your money, not just in fees, but also in missed opportunities, like price movements that take place in the time between your decision and execution. Investing in individual securities is probably too risky if you don't have enough money. But beware that a fund which diversifies your risk may cease to exist when it is so cheap it makes its organisers and brokers low fees. Indeed, brokers don't want you to buy low, because it cuts down their profits. Bagehot and Kindleberger long ago debunked them, but conspiratists still con gullible counterparties who they further con saying the theory failed not because it was wrong but because the market was rigged. And advisors have been burned by customers who overreact that they spend more of their time protecting themselves than helping their customers; Macchiavel long ago warned many will turn against their best friends if they feel they cost them money. Further many investors are confused by bonds which are cheap when the issuer is risky but the interest is high. A high yield ("junk") fund is fine for paying utility bills if you have relatively little time left to live. Deflation and depression imply negative interest rates, where the opportunity cost is not for holding, but spending, money; Negative rates may be concealed as extraordinarily high banking fees, but nonetheless cause a liquidity trap, which is the opposite of an inflationary spiral. Compounding involves exponential integrals, which are beyond most investor comprehension but which requires dividend reinvestment minimising transaction fees. Mutual funds have mutliple securities to spread risk. Exchange traded funds are mutual funds with fewer transaction costs. But funds could die long before their underlying securities. First you have a real estate ETF like RFI (5,20) into which you put money you anticipate to need for real estate, including taxes; It will go down when real estate goes down, but that is fine because so will the price of any real estate you want to buy: This is called hedging. Then you put your safest (most essential) funds into a municipal bond fund like VTEB (49,52): First it is tax free, then it is likely to be safer, although municipalities will go broke when interest rises; Again that is fine because other municipalities in the fund won't, and interest rates will rise to cover it. The municipal fund is the one you might derive income from and not reinvest (all?) the dividends. Then, depending on your age you get more of a growth fund like VUG (37,122) the younger or less risk averse you are, and a value fund like IWC (24,85) the older or more risk averse you are. You need to record the all-time highs and lows of these funds: If you have leftover income, invest it on the fund which is closest to its all-time low; If you need money (it is best not to touch your investments as the integral under a sine curve is zero) sell the one closest to its all-time high. Use the funds I used as a guide but pick your own funds, everything always changes and you may feel more comfortable with something else. Research them. ts on investing Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 To make money investing, buy low, compound, sell high, not as easy as it sounds. Prices are low precisely when noone has money to invest, including you. Then transaction costs can take as much as a third of your money, not just in fees, but also in missed opportunities, like price movements that take place in the time between your decision and execution. Investing in individual securities is probably too risky if you don't have enough money. But beware that a fund which diversifies your risk may cease to exist when it is so cheap it makes its organisers and brokers low fees. Indeed, brokers don't want you to buy low, because it cuts down their profits. Bagehot and Kindleberger long ago debunked them, but conspiratists still con gullible counterparties who they further con saying the theory failed not because it was wrong but because the market was rigged. And advisors have been burned by customers who overreact that they spend more of their time protecting themselves than helping their customers; Macchiavel long ago warned many will turn against their best friends if they feel they cost them money. Further many investors are confused by bonds which are cheap when the issuer is risky but the interest is high. A high yield ("junk") fund is fine for paying utility bills if you have relatively little time left to live. Deflation and depression imply negative interest rates, where the opportunity cost is not for holding, but spending, money; Negative rates may be concealed as extraordinarily high banking fees, but nonetheless cause a liquidity trap, which is the opposite of an inflationary spiral. Compounding involves exponential integrals, which are beyond most investor comprehension but which requires dividend reinvestment minimising transaction fees. Mutual funds have mutliple securities to spread risk. Exchange traded funds are mutual funds with fewer transaction costs. But funds could die long before their underlying securities. First you have a real estate ETF like RFI (5,20) into which you put money you anticipate to need for real estate, including taxes; It will go down when real estate goes down, but that is fine because so will the price of any real estate you want to buy: This is called hedging. Then you put your safest (most essential) funds into a municipal bond fund like VTEB (49,52): First it is tax free, then it is likely to be safer, although municipalities will go broke when interest rises; Again that is fine because other municipalities in the fund won't, and interest rates will rise to cover it. The municipal fund is the one you might derive income from and not reinvest (all?) the dividends. Then, depending on your age you get more of a growth fund like VUG (37,122) the younger or less risk averse you are, and a value fund like IWC (24,85) the older or more risk averse you are. You need to record the all-time highs and lows of these funds: If you have leftover income, invest it on the fund which is closest to its all-time low; If you need money (it is best not to touch your investments as the integral under a sine curve is zero) sell the one closest to its all-time high. Use the funds I used as a guide but pick your own funds, everything always changes and you may feel more comfortable with something else. Research them.
misc.invest.misc:55258 9 May 2017 To make money investing, buy low, compound, sell high, not as easy as it sounds. Prices are low precisely when noone has money to invest, including you. Then transaction costs can take as much as a third of your money, not just in fees, but also in missed opportunities, like price movements that take place in the time between your decision and execution. Investing in individual securities is probably too risky if you don't have enough money. But beware that a fund which diversifies your risk may cease to exist when it is so cheap it makes its organisers and brokers low fees. Indeed, brokers don't want you to buy low, because it cuts down their profits. Bagehot and Kindleberger long ago debunked them, but conspiratists still con gullible counterparties who they further con saying the theory failed not because it was wrong but because the market was rigged. And advisors have been burned by customers who overreact that they spend more of their time protecting themselves than helping their customers; Macchiavel long ago warned many will turn against their best friends if they feel they cost them money. Further many investors are confused by bonds which are cheap when the issuer is risky but the interest is high. A high yield ("junk") fund is fine for paying utility bills if you have relatively little time left to live. Deflation and depression imply negative interest rates, where the opportunity cost is not for holding, but spending, money; Negative rates may be concealed as extraordinarily high banking fees, but nonetheless cause a liquidity trap, which is the opposite of an inflationary spiral. Compounding involves exponential integrals, which are beyond most investor comprehension but which requires dividend reinvestment minimising transaction fees. Mutual funds have mutliple securities to spread risk. Exchange traded funds are mutual funds with fewer transaction costs. But funds could die long before their underlying securities. First you have a real estate ETF like RFI (5,20) into which you put money you anticipate to need for real estate, including taxes; It will go down when real estate goes down, but that is fine because so will the price of any real estate you want to buy: This is called hedging. Then you put your safest (most essential) funds into a municipal bond fund like VTEB (49,52): First it is tax free, then it is likely to be safer, although municipalities will go broke when interest rises; Again that is fine because other municipalities in the fund won't, and interest rates will rise to cover it. The municipal fund is the one you might derive income from and not reinvest (all?) the dividends. Then, depending on your age you get more of a growth fund like VUG (37,122) the younger or less risk averse you are, and a value fund like IWC (24,85) the older or more risk averse you are. You need to record the all-time highs and lows of these funds: If you have leftover income, invest it on the fund which is closest to its all-time low; If you need money (it is best not to touch your investments as the integral under a sine curve is zero) sell the one closest to its all-time high. Use the funds I used as a guide but pick your own funds, everything always changes and you may feel more comfortable with something else. Research them. ts on investing Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 To make money investing, buy low, compound, sell high, not as easy as it sounds. Prices are low precisely when noone has money to invest, including you. Then transaction costs can take as much as a third of your money, not just in fees, but also in missed opportunities, like price movements that take place in the time between your decision and execution. Investing in individual securities is probably too risky if you don't have enough money. But beware that a fund which diversifies your risk may cease to exist when it is so cheap it makes its organisers and brokers low fees. Indeed, brokers don't want you to buy low, because it cuts down their profits. Bagehot and Kindleberger long ago debunked them, but conspiratists still con gullible counterparties who they further con saying the theory failed not because it was wrong but because the market was rigged. And advisors have been burned by customers who overreact that they spend more of their time protecting themselves than helping their customers; Macchiavel long ago warned many will turn against their best friends if they feel they cost them money. Further many investors are confused by bonds which are cheap when the issuer is risky but the interest is high. A high yield ("junk") fund is fine for paying utility bills if you have relatively little time left to live. Deflation and depression imply negative interest rates, where the opportunity cost is not for holding, but spending, money; Negative rates may be concealed as extraordinarily high banking fees, but nonetheless cause a liquidity trap, which is the opposite of an inflationary spiral. Compounding involves exponential integrals, which are beyond most investor comprehension but which requires dividend reinvestment minimising transaction fees. Mutual funds have mutliple securities to spread risk. Exchange traded funds are mutual funds with fewer transaction costs. But funds could die long before their underlying securities. First you have a real estate ETF like RFI (5,20) into which you put money you anticipate to need for real estate, including taxes; It will go down when real estate goes down, but that is fine because so will the price of any real estate you want to buy: This is called hedging. Then you put your safest (most essential) funds into a municipal bond fund like VTEB (49,52): First it is tax free, then it is likely to be safer, although municipalities will go broke when interest rises; Again that is fine because other municipalities in the fund won't, and interest rates will rise to cover it. The municipal fund is the one you might derive income from and not reinvest (all?) the dividends. Then, depending on your age you get more of a growth fund like VUG (37,122) the younger or less risk averse you are, and a value fund like IWC (24,85) the older or more risk averse you are. You need to record the all-time highs and lows of these funds: If you have leftover income, invest it on the fund which is closest to its all-time low; If you need money (it is best not to touch your investments as the integral under a sine curve is zero) sell the one closest to its all-time high. Use the funds I used as a guide but pick your own funds, everything always changes and you may feel more comfortable with something else. Research them.
misc.invest.misc:55258 9 May 2017 To make money investing, buy low, compound, sell high, not as easy as it sounds. Prices are low precisely when noone has money to invest, including you. Then transaction costs can take as much as a third of your money, not just in fees, but also in missed opportunities, like price movements that take place in the time between your decision and execution. Investing in individual securities is probably too risky if you don't have enough money. But beware that a fund which diversifies your risk may cease to exist when it is so cheap it makes its organisers and brokers low fees. Indeed, brokers don't want you to buy low, because it cuts down their profits. Bagehot and Kindleberger long ago debunked them, but conspiratists still con gullible counterparties who they further con saying the theory failed not because it was wrong but because the market was rigged. And advisors have been burned by customers who overreact that they spend more of their time protecting themselves than helping their customers; Macchiavel long ago warned many will turn against their best friends if they feel they cost them money. Further many investors are confused by bonds which are cheap when the issuer is risky but the interest is high. A high yield ("junk") fund is fine for paying utility bills if you have relatively little time left to live. Deflation and depression imply negative interest rates, where the opportunity cost is not for holding, but spending, money; Negative rates may be concealed as extraordinarily high banking fees, but nonetheless cause a liquidity trap, which is the opposite of an inflationary spiral. Compounding involves exponential integrals, which are beyond most investor comprehension but which requires dividend reinvestment minimising transaction fees. Mutual funds have mutliple securities to spread risk. Exchange traded funds are mutual funds with fewer transaction costs. But funds could die long before their underlying securities. First you have a real estate ETF like RFI (5,20) into which you put money you anticipate to need for real estate, including taxes; It will go down when real estate goes down, but that is fine because so will the price of any real estate you want to buy: This is called hedging. Then you put your safest (most essential) funds into a municipal bond fund like VTEB (49,52): First it is tax free, then it is likely to be safer, although municipalities will go broke when interest rises; Again that is fine because other municipalities in the fund won't, and interest rates will rise to cover it. The municipal fund is the one you might derive income from and not reinvest (all?) the dividends. Then, depending on your age you get more of a growth fund like VUG (37,122) the younger or less risk averse you are, and a value fund like IWC (24,85) the older or more risk averse you are. You need to record the all-time highs and lows of these funds: If you have leftover income, invest it on the fund which is closest to its all-time low; If you need money (it is best not to touch your investments as the integral under a sine curve is zero) sell the one closest to its all-time high. Use the funds I used as a guide but pick your own funds, everything always changes and you may feel more comfortable with something else. Research them. ts on investing Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 To make money investing, buy low, compound, sell high, not as easy as it sounds. Prices are low precisely when noone has money to invest, including you. Then transaction costs can take as much as a third of your money, not just in fees, but also in missed opportunities, like price movements that take place in the time between your decision and execution. Investing in individual securities is probably too risky if you don't have enough money. But beware that a fund which diversifies your risk may cease to exist when it is so cheap it makes its organisers and brokers low fees. Indeed, brokers don't want you to buy low, because it cuts down their profits. Bagehot and Kindleberger long ago debunked them, but conspiratists still con gullible counterparties who they further con saying the theory failed not because it was wrong but because the market was rigged. And advisors have been burned by customers who overreact that they spend more of their time protecting themselves than helping their customers; Macchiavel long ago warned many will turn against their best friends if they feel they cost them money. Further many investors are confused by bonds which are cheap when the issuer is risky but the interest is high. A high yield ("junk") fund is fine for paying utility bills if you have relatively little time left to live. Deflation and depression imply negative interest rates, where the opportunity cost is not for holding, but spending, money; Negative rates may be concealed as extraordinarily high banking fees, but nonetheless cause a liquidity trap, which is the opposite of an inflationary spiral. Compounding involves exponential integrals, which are beyond most investor comprehension but which requires dividend reinvestment minimising transaction fees. Mutual funds have mutliple securities to spread risk. Exchange traded funds are mutual funds with fewer transaction costs. But funds could die long before their underlying securities. First you have a real estate ETF like RFI (5,20) into which you put money you anticipate to need for real estate, including taxes; It will go down when real estate goes down, but that is fine because so will the price of any real estate you want to buy: This is called hedging. Then you put your safest (most essential) funds into a municipal bond fund like VTEB (49,52): First it is tax free, then it is likely to be safer, although municipalities will go broke when interest rises; Again that is fine because other municipalities in the fund won't, and interest rates will rise to cover it. The municipal fund is the one you might derive income from and not reinvest (all?) the dividends. Then, depending on your age you get more of a growth fund like VUG (37,122) the younger or less risk averse you are, and a value fund like IWC (24,85) the older or more risk averse you are. You need to record the all-time highs and lows of these funds: If you have leftover income, invest it on the fund which is closest to its all-time low; If you need money (it is best not to touch your investments as the integral under a sine curve is zero) sell the one closest to its all-time high. Use the funds I used as a guide but pick your own funds, everything always changes and you may feel more comfortable with something else. Research them.
For sure, Its basically a way to view low beta vs high beta preference in the markets way, low beta stocks will often outperform by nature in bear markets as they’re designed to do and visa versa. It’s one of very few reliable things you can do to to help you determine future price. There’s other value / growth tickers like IWD-IWC that you can use in substitution, you just need to make them equalweighted to make it reliable
>I have done as you suggested, and the results are quite interesting. The two securities appear to be very closely correlated, with a few notable exceptions. Overall, it seems that VLUE-IWC is slightly more volatile than SPY, but this could simply be due to noise in the data. Thank you for your suggestion!
Type in VLUE-IWC into your charts and compare it to the SPY...thank me later
You still have to wind them if it was left alone for days. IWC watches are like this
Panerai too big Patek too expensive IWC too busy dial I am simple.
It’s okay but I don’t like Rolex. How about a Radiomir California or a Patek Nautilus or maybe the IWC Top Gun? The Rolex seem to need less service but too many people have them.
VTI and IWC are the largest holders of rail in their portfolios if you are looking for ETF
Depends on the watch I have Apple Watch, IWC Mark XVIII Heritage, A Lange & Sohne 1815, Shinola Runwell, Hamilton Khaki Field Automatic
Probably from being shorted. It's in the IWC etf, which is definitely shorted to shit. Financials aren't great, but the product seems solid, and after a reverse stock split, AGRX has a tiny float.
Looks like INPIXON may bounce from this ATL institutions been accumulating they have only been growing with indoor mapping getting into crypto metaverse now did a offering around .48 closing of offering should be announced any day nice time to accumulate at .28 Top holders of Inpixon sourced from 13F and NPORT filings include: Armistice Capital, Llc with 7,023,950 shares (5.64% ownership) Vanguard Group Inc with 4,900,164 shares (3.93% ownership) VTSMX - Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Investor Shares with 2,722,801 shares (2.19% ownership) VEXMX - Vanguard Extended Market Index Fund Investor Shares with 1,873,222 shares (1.50% ownership) BlackRock Inc. with 1,225,764 shares (0.98% ownership) Geode Capital Management, Llc with 991,677 shares (0.80% ownership) FSMAX - Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund with 680,814 shares (0.55% ownership) Gsa Capital Partners Llp with 569,580 shares (0.46% ownership) State Street Corp with 326,799 shares (0.26% ownership) IWC - iShares Micro-Cap ETF with 231,873 shares (0.19% ownership)
Cartier Tank, Breitling, IWC and of course Jaeger LeCoutre if you have taste
**See a loooot of bears here who fell for the media FUD last week, fear indicator now at extreme fear, lots of bears here wanting 410 and 400 tomorrow.** **They will make it extremely hard to hold puts. It's very bullish for Monday. Here's why:**  1) Friday sell off was low volume on SPY, pure panic selling from retail. 2) The most extreme fear on the on the statistics right now, and i have yet to spot a single bull in any social media right now, and everyone who is a bull for Monday gets ridiculed. 3) https://mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSS0N2RG028 Yellen claimed there will be a “soft landing” in addition to Burry calling this year 1977, where the market declined 20% but was super choppy. I predict this market will do the same, as a crash would completely demolish the democrats chances at midterms. 4) Last year, when Friday session ended at LOD like today, only one case had Monday gap down. All other cases had Monday gap up. Yes this year situation is completely different. BUT we KNOW how they love to make it hard to diamond hand puts. Just looked how they screwed everyone puts the day before CPI. 5) DIX(Darkpool Index) over 50% now, while SPY is down, whenever this happens, a short rally shortly follows, as this indicates lots of under the table activity of hedge funds buying during down days, as their darkpool order buy finishes their sale at the end of day price. 6) Small caps AND clean energy sectors, both outperforming the SPY the past month very hard. Go look at IWC and ICLN compared to SPY. All energy and small caps are making higher lows. 7) The Russian Negotiation Team has stated to the RIA, which is Russian Media, that there has been developments between Ukraine and Russia, so much so they expect a ceasefire to be signed in the next 2-3 days. I could make an actual post about this on WSB with all the charts and everything, but I don't think those normies not on the discussion thread deserve to see this
$MULN is in the following ETF's $IWC $VTI $VXF $ITOT Any SHF, or other entity with prime broker access can take a net short on any of these ETF's and then buy the rest of the basket aside from the % mullen is in to stay neutral on the position, and short on MULN. This is usually even offered as a total return swap so there is maximum leverage. As long as there is 1 share in 1 ETF, ETF's can be used as share printers. More commonly SHF's will then pack these return swaps into puts or various derivatives on the ETF, not even the stock itself, which allows them to continually kick the can with their only downside being the premium on puts/derivatives. So all in all, "no, you"
Rolex Explorer II Polar A Lange & Sohne 1815 IWC Mark XVIII Heritage Hamilton Khaki Field Automatic Apple Watch
Modsaregay’s gay story triggered an old memory: When I lived in Thailand I was friends with a rich girl. Was not attracted to her but we hung out and went to the clubs etc. I knew she was rich but didn’t know how rich until much later. She had a friend we also hung out with who was billionaire family money. We hung out at clubs etc didn’t know didn’t care - one day he decided he wanted to play gay chicken with me (he was gay obv). Talked about my dick blah blah blah right out of the gay chicken playbook. Motherfucker actually went to grab my shit and tried to be aggressive about it. I’m used to the gay advances by then whatever but this was more - it was backed by that weird Uber rich creepy entitlement. You think I’m gonna turn gay because you’re rich? You must not know I suck dick behind Wendy’s for 20 bucks and a baked potato. Anyway after that we (rich girl, rich gay dude, some other random) went to Chiang Mai in the north - beautiful hotel suite etc all private shit. I was in the room with the girl. Typically I’m a hound and would hit it, but I wasn’t remotely interested as she would make coy advances laying next to me while we watched Supernatural on CW. Room was sexy, if it was now I prob would have whipped out the iPhone and made a porn fuck it. Back then, nope. Then we went to the south of Thailand. Gay dude flew in seafood from Europe like it was a thing he does regularly. Call me poor, but Outback shrimp and a bloomin’ onion makes me horny. Went back to Bangkok because I had to come home to the US for a couple of weeks. Went to a club that night, got shitcanned, banged rich girls friend (another Uber rich girl who showed me her collection of IWC and Panerai mens watches), and missed my flight. The Uber rich are fucking predators, that’s my story. Weird entitlement that’s off-putting to us poors, and they don’t understand (or care). But hey they get to literally do whatever they want and fly in seafood from Europe because they feel like it. Literally do not ever think of how much something costs, just that they want it at that moment. I guess what I’m trying to say is I wish I was rich.
XRT holds GME, IWM hold AMC. Then there is IJR IWC and several others. All trading sideways since January.
Hey, Vacheron Constantin (even the "tilt" historique....love the overseas in rose gold though blue dial), JLC (love the reverso....the green), Richard Mille already discussed, as well as even Cartier (not for me but Santos are SUPER popular and unisex), some TAGs (160 anniv. Montreal Carrera, Monacos, Blue dreamer, etc.) are coming back despite some brand fading recently, etc. There are so many nice watches. Bell and Ross, Panerai, IWC (portuguiesser chrono on blue alligator leather white dial) Omega (007 300 model , speedy racing "fake panda") I think RM is a unique and niche market of luxury watches. Time will tell but I feel the valuations aren't sustainable and neither is their style. Certain models will hold value forever but not all models will consistently outperform like now IMO. AP is the same like you say. Yes.. Some Royal Oaks (especially rose gold, perpetual calendars) will hold forever but not all ROs will stay the same premium forever as a whole IMO. I think RM marketing is GREAT and why they are where they are and they have some incredible models, granted. But this is my opinion. Influence people market them and like them. For code 11:59 and this is only IMO you cannot go wrong with a nice dress watch with flair on an alligator leather strap, open work, even in rose gold? A model like this will be right direction for certain buyers forever. I think the royal oak will outperform it but this gives a good one two punch. Sorry for the watch talk and thanks also. Happy holidays and good luck!
I have Rolex Polar Explorer II 216570, IWC Pilot Mark VIII Heritage Titanium, A Lange & Sohne 1815, Apple Watch, Hamilton Khaki Field Automatic and Shinola Runwell Contrast Chrono. But I only wear the Hamilton or the Shinola because I am afraid of banging or scratching the other ones. Apple Watch, I keep forgetting to charge it, so I don't wear it either. Dumbest fucking hobby ever
$GS is teetering if there's anymore $IWM $IWC strength
It is not for my enjoyment - it is a classic fuck you move to people financially less successful than you. Ego play really - I got IWC Portugieser, Rolex Oyster Peprpet. and Hublot Fusion Black to enjoy
They are in talks with Richemont which is a large luxury jewelry/watch company. Including brands like Montblanc, IWC and Chloé.
Been looking into getting an IWC Portofino moon phase. So nice.
Gonna rip into more IWM and IWC, while holding my SPX & QQQ calls. Got 45K for the next dip, may even snag some VIX calls if it hits below $15.
The IWC agrees with buyout rumors.
Nice. At the bell, picked up 10x 08/25 443.00Cs, with 8x 08/23 440Ps as downside protection. Holding a good chunk of NVDA and IWC monthlies.
It's all about size. Large cap index: up 0.3% Medium cap index (IJH): down -0.7% Small cap index (IWM): down -1.1% Micro cap index (IWC): down -1.7%
Large cap index: up 0.3% Medium cap index (IJH): down -0.7% Small cap index (IWM): down -1.1% Micro cap index (IWC): down -1.7%
True. But small caps (IWM) and microcaps (IWC) are near record highs as well. In the long run stock prices reflect earnings. In the short run prices reflect the Fed’s balanced sheet. This is not one of those wah wah blame the Fed posts, I am just telling it like it is. All Delta has done has encouraged more people to get vaccines, and made it less palatable for the fed to taper their absurd streak of asset purchases too quickly.
The Russell has been sideways since February. MDY, SP600 and IWC have all done the same. Mid and small caps have definitely been struggling.
Their reputation is considerably better than it was in the Attitude Era. The IWC dumps on the WWE for doing events for rich Saudi princes, but that doesn't resonate the same way with Joe Average non-wrestling fan as lingerie models having pillow fights in the middle of the ring and Bubba Ray powerbombing women through tables.
I know plenty of assholes (me included) wear Rolex. I like the sub for 3 reasons: 1) it’s sharp and has little rounded surfaces. See how the flanks are flat and not looking like a parenthesis ? Even the crown guards are sharp, in the sense that they are a cylinder instead of an oval. 2) with the 2020 edition, all hands have excellent proportions and the base circle of the hour hand is now smaller, you notice it being large on sea dweller (look at the axis). 3) typefaces are all excellent. Beautiful and no nonsense. I like many many watches, especially the more vintage ones. My recommendation for a new cool watch would be based on my tastes only. However I can give you a few guidelines that I follow: I avoid brands that belong to luxury group. LVMH and Richemont, I avoid (I know Vacheron is one of them, but anyhow they don’t have anything I like). Many brands sell their watches as commodities that are meant to live in a trend instead of enduring through time. See for exemple Panerai, Omega, and IWC, changing the colors a bit and calling it the new 2021 edition of the same old watch. It reduces the value of the whole line because you now have too many variants. Just like your car that gets design cues changes each 2 years, the goal is simply to budge you to think the one you have is old and that the new is better, when the new is actually now built in with planned obsolescence (it can also be applied to design in the aesthetic sense). In 2 years the James Bond edition of Seamaster will look old. In 20 years submariner 2020 will look new. But ultimately wear what you enjoy. Just be wary of marketing and the fact they just want to sell shit products in the end. Watches are not luxury good more than any other thing. Patek designs the calibers to be easier to make at a cheaper cost, Rolex removes any kind of complexity (chamfers) so they produce faster and cheaper, etc. Me, I’m looking at the past because what I like today is beyond my budget or simply priced absurdly.
Any watch? My dream collection would include a Rolex Daytona, probably an omega speed master. IWC pilot, and the next in real life will probably be a Breitling Super Ocean Heritage. I know it’s not the most popular diver but I have a bit of a Breitling thing (though not the super tacky stuff) as I picked up a Navitimer earlier this year which is also part of the dream collection.
IWC and IWN are the ETFs in the micro cap 🧢 value space. WS Bets likes them. The Hedgies will be crushed with the games they play. ⬆️🆙🐘🦧😁
Y’all realize that these now-leveraged memes are in IWC, IJR, and IWM, yeah?
Any idea why IWC has been running so hard last two days? It’s literally ripping
#IJR IWC the way to play meme pop
IWC, IJR the way to play along Russel too
Man I think they’re all part of it now—not a danger But IWM and especially IWC and IJR are benefiting heavily...
So IWC calls at open tomorrow?
What teh fawck did yuw juwst fuwcken t-type about me, yuw w-widdwe bitch? I’ww have yuw k-knyow I gwadwated top of mwy cwass at MIT, awnd I’ve been invowved in numewous secwet waids wid Anonymous, awnd I h-have ovew 300 confiwmed DDoSes. I am twained in onwine twowwing awnd I-I’m teh top h-hackew in teh entiwe w-wowwd. Yuw awe noding tuwu me but juwst anodew viwus host. I wiww wipe yuw teh fawck owt wid pwecision teh wikes of which has nevew been seen befowe on teh Intewnet, m-mawk mwy fuwcken wowds. Yuw dink yuw can get away wid t-typing dat shit tuwu me ovew teh Intewnet? Dink again, fuckew. As we c-chat ovew IWC I am twacing youw IP wid mwy damn bawe h-hands so yuw bettew pwepawe fow teh stowm, maggot. Teh stowm dat wipes owt teh p-padetic widdwe ding yuw caww youw computew. Yuw’we fuwcken d-dead, kid. I can be anywhewe, anytime, awnd I can h-hack into youw f-fiwes in ovew seven hundwed ways, awnd dat’s juwst wid mwy bawe hands. Not onwy am I e-extensivewy twained in hacking, but I have access tuwu teh entiwe awsenaw of e-evewy piece of mawwawe e-evew cweated a-awnd I wiww use iwt tuwu its fuww extent t-tuwu wipe youw misewabwe ass off teh face of teh wowwd wide web, yuw w-widdwe shit. If onwy yuw couwd have known w-what unhowy w-wetwibution youw widdwe “cwevew” comment was about t-tuwu bwing down u-upon yuw, maybe yuw wouwd have hewd youw fuwcken fingews. But yuw couwdn’t, yuw didn’t, awnd now yuw’we paying teh pwice, yuw g-goddamn idiot. I wiww s-shit code aww ovew yuw awnd yuw wiww dwown in iwt. Yuw’we f-fuwcken dead, kiddo.
Yes IWM is my fav, this IWC is like the Russell 2000 on steroids. Micro caps is where WSBets plays.