PR

-Authorised-

By analyst? Interesting, link? The key thing is even if this is true they will still be profitable and will have had a huge previous year of earnings, a massive turnaround story. Also that was before they grew by 22% in this PR so already out of date. They are growing. That decrease is probably on the assumption that somehow hormuz is total normal by then which i dont think it will ever be the same anyway

Crazy_Donkies

What? We are ignoring GOOG, MSFT, sovereign AI, ORCL, IBM internal, Japan models, India. We are also ignoring inference expected to grow 79% CAGR. Moreover you are listening to a PR person? You anti AI folks will listen to a PR person (PR!) but NOT the thousands of experts in consensus around the world? Yeah this is a hard pass.

account-names

Anduril press NATO release: [https://www.anduril.com/news/anduril-secures-first-nato-contract-lattice-for-eairc2-data-platform-initiative](https://www.anduril.com/news/anduril-secures-first-nato-contract-lattice-for-eairc2-data-platform-initiative) And Defense Award linking Anduril to ASTS: [https://www.sbir.gov/awards/218121](https://www.sbir.gov/awards/218121) "Titan Systems intends to work with commercial SATCOM providers such as Lynk Corporation, AST Space Mobile and Hubble Network" Missed adding anduril PR in earlier comment

Chickenuggetsman

How high do we think BATL can go?? Would it be almost the same as it March run?! But of course that time it had some company catalysts not this time around unless they give some PR https://preview.redd.it/6543zx92o2ch1.jpeg?width=1179&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c113e4908bdff1624d18194e535f889d820ac0e6

Additional_Tax_478

Really appreciate this - and that filter you described ("would a normal investor care about this?") is exactly the right frame. I use almost the same logic. On your question - a few specific things I look for first: **Source.** Is this a newswire (PR Newswire, GlobeNewswire, BusinessWire) or a paid placement? Paid newsletter drops and "exclusive interviews" on financial blogs are almost always promo. Newswire filings are at least self-reported, which is a higher bar. **Language vagueness.** Real catalysts are specific. "FDA grants approval for X indication" is specific. "Company announces strategic initiative to expand market presence" is a pump waiting to happen. The vaguer the headline the harder I look before touching it. **Timing of the news vs the gap.** If the stock gapped overnight but the news hit two days ago, someone is recycling. I always check when the filing or release actually dropped versus when the price started moving. **Who else is covering it.** If the only coverage is on ticker-focused Twitter accounts and one financial newsletter, that tells me something. If it shows up on Reuters or a sector-specific outlet, the bar is higher. The Canadian market piece is interesting - dilution mechanics are slightly different there with how some of these shells operate. Do you find the promo patterns differ much between TSX-V names and US OTC/small cap?

SDBcop

Hey, really good post. I’ve been through the exact same cycle — getting chopped up on what looked like perfect gap setups, only to realize later I was exit liquidity on paid pumps. The part you said about “real catalyst vs PR pump” is spot on. That distinction is everything in small caps. I’ve seen the same pattern way too many times: big pre-market gap on vague language, heavy volume from the usual promo accounts, then the hard rollover once the momentum traders are done. What helped me a lot was building filters that force me to answer one simple question before I even look at the chart: **Is there something today that a normal investor (not a momentum trader) would actually care about?** If the answer isn’t clearly yes, I skip it. I run a daily volume scanner that flags unusual activity across the Canadian and US markets, then I manually go through them with pretty much the same checklist you described (real news, credible source, context, risk). It’s saved me from a ton of the “feels good but it’s promo” traps. I post some of the setups I’m looking at (with the reasoning) on my site if you ever want to compare notes. Not trying to sell anything — just sharing the process. Curious — when you’re checking catalysts, do you have any specific sources or red flags you always look for first?

orsomeshitidk

I’m convinced the hype around these new models being blocked from the public is mostly just PR bullshit to justify this level of Capex without the actual product they’re building it for existing yet.

Nilaru

This company has zero revenue, zero products on the market, and is on at least its third identity. It started in 2001 as Echo Metrix (child-safety texting software), became Protext Mobility, pivoted to green tea extract (Phytofare/Plandaí), then to cannabis, and now to "RWA tokenization." It's a serial pivoter. The LOI from Venezuela is a non-binding letter from a massively sanctioned government in crisis, and an ambassador from Chad joining the board of a company with no revenue are hardly positives. You also forgot to mention that TXTM received a Caveat Emptor designation in November 2022 for its activity, and stayed there for 3 years. Also also, Deloitte is NOT auditing them. The PR statement from TXTM says they had a "preliminary engagement for a valuation". Their own materials say this for price discovery. That's not an audit opinion, and "preliminary engagement" means nothing. Deloitte has confirmed nothing publicly. And IAS 41 converts 600M to 20 billion? Where the heck do you get that? IAS 41 fair-value accounting is what already produced the inflated 505-600M figure. IAS 41 measures biological assets at market price less costs to sell, and there's no market on Earth that prices their seed stock at 20B. That would exceed the annual value of the entire legal global weed industry.

BeginningRoad1661

Fun fact they don’t have to use the rest and probably won’t. Or they’ll use a little bit just to PR it to try and pump. See IXHL

agent00F

I'm talking about what's actually happening in reality, not State Dept PR narratives. But speaking of "democracy", consider that nearly half the US gdp is healthcare or finance--would you say actual policy in those (or any) sectors is made to the benefit of the "demos"? By definition it's a plutocracy, but the real insight is if I ask again whether the US is democratic the "right answer" from up on high is "yes".

BeginningRoad1661

holding AMPG worry free overnight. debt free and literally release the 2 best pieces of news in one PR you could ask for. Weird they didn’t run it higher this morning. I think 9-10 is easy

BradKooler

Lol I'm not in PR. I like tech/was in the field, and I can see them going this route. Mars is not going to happen (who cares, if they do anything its to build a 3D printed hotel on the moon) and I really don't care about that aspect of this stock, but the Space "Cloud" compute for data backup for enterprise is a big deal if they go this route. So I like the SpaceX engineers, Elon can go fuck himself, for a tech prospective it seems very doable and worth building out.

QuadzillaStrider

This reads like PR

throwaway9gk0k4k569

Which begs the question: Why is Zuckerturd so desperate to pump? He's been throwing PR shit out desperately all month. All they have to is reduce CapEx and say they are focusing on what makes them tons of money instead of doing stupid shit. But he can't do that. Why not? It's not just psychological.

agent00F

Westerners ironically don't understand capitalism, where competition is supposed to drive profit to zero. Profits are high in the west through regulatory capture etc. The "regulation" referred to here in China was to stop anticompetitive behavior in the tech sector, which predictably reduced profit to the benefit of the consumer. Of course it's obvious why nobody can admit to any of this even if they understood it, since subjects of the empire need to regurgitate the state dept PR line as the post I replied to perfectly illustrates.

Secret_Block_8755

I took the loss yesterday, so you'll get your PR today I reckon.

MajesticBread9147

Humanoid robotics aren't going to be the limitation though. It's easy to imagine, and certainly very versatile, but unless it's for niche tasks that don't have the economies of scale to build a lot of specialized robots, being humanoid won't be much of a benefit beyond being PR-friendly. Look at all the robotics that exist and continue to be developed in manufacturing, from giant robot arms picking things up, welding, painting, or cutting, to specialized robots for dispensing glue or screwing in circuit boards. Hell, even the simple Roomba shows that humanoid robots aren't often the best option nor the limitation.

agent00F

Basically all the posts here are based on complete ignorance, from people who've literally never been on the ground and just parrot what they hear from state dept PR. The fundamental reason stocks there don't return is due to competition (involution, meaning margins go to zero), which largely doesn't exist in the west. The contrast can't be more clear if you've ever been there. People are often confused about this, but shouldn't be since the number one thing b-schools here actually teach is how to build moats and collect rent.

Ok_Ground9015

Not PR, but an 8-K. The CFO Joy L. Mbanug was let go. The new CFO is Melissa G. Podruzny. This is likely why the company has been so hush hush. We are likely to get real PR as soon as tomorrow. [https://kinstechnology.gcs-web.com/node/8366/html](https://kinstechnology.gcs-web.com/node/8366/html)

PaperHandsTheDip

Entry level, yes. But entry level jobs are disappearing as they can be largely automated. The skillset has changed / is changing. Domain specific knowledge is significantly more valuable at the moment. IE: I'm implementing things at quite literally over 10x the velocity I was pre-AI. Everything is still adhering to my designs / standards. But instead of having to write a couple hundred lines of code by hand - I can get an agent to do it. Tell it to iterate a few times & 20 minutes later it does exactly what I wanted. Implement tests, etc, and it "works". Today I created and merged \~8 PR's exceeding 4k LOC, ie. I've been working while shitposting all day. The flow has changed drastically.

OkBeginning9576

What was your old PR (any distance)?

PuzzleheadedChip2720

It's just a PR stunt so they can point at it later and say "see Anthropic does it too, it's just tit for tat"

Ok_Ground9015

You're going to miss the after hours PR on CXAI.

a_kato

Steam is only digital you didn’t care about it. Nor did anyone ever care. The reason steam is glazed is just good PR. Like they have the biggest gambling ring in the world (cs go) that they actively support and advertise in their official tournaments (not to mention a lot of other stuff like tools to sell things at scale) and they get 0 flank for it. There is no such as consistent moral in the gaming it is whatever is popular. “Unions good” until it’s time to buy GTA 6. Disks good, but not for my computer or steam deck. “Exclusivety is bad”, oh shit why would anyone buy an Xbox if no exclusives Closed ecosystems and exclusives are bad. Until it’s my favorite donkey kong bananza then it’s so good buy a switch 2. The reason steam is glazed is because it’s popular and that’s the “consensus”.

Regenbooggeit

It won’t affect it because they basically have a monopoly when it comes to next gen consoles. Nintendo has a different market. If a competitor can do better and still keep physical, it could be a huge win. Just the PR side of it will do wonders. But Microsoft is just flopping with everything they do nowadays so yeah, it’ll probably won’t matter anyway.

Ok_Ground9015

Some PR would be real nice. The silence is killing me and killing the share price as well.

ateranol

Why does cyber keep pumping, yet SaaS is standing still. Cyber is juts SaaS with good PR

Regenbooggeit

Microsoft could punch Sony in the face with PR-buttfucking their digital-only move. Just remake all the commercials that Sony made mocking Microsoft back in the PS4 era. And announce they will keep physical games. But with GamePass I think they just went balls-deep into subscription-based gaming and now people don't know why they should get an Xbox instead of a PC or PS5 when there's hardly any console exclusives.

Latter-Librarian9272

Woke virtue signaling is when studios use superficial diversity as a cheap PR strategy rather than putting in the hard work for actual representation. Instead of taking the financial risk to greenlight original stories built from the ground up by diverse creators, executives take the lazy, safe route: they reboot decades-old franchises and just swap the race or gender of established characters. It’s a performative, box-ticking exercise that lets corporate boards pat themselves on the back for being progressive, all while shortchanging minority audiences out of rich, original cultural icons of their own. It also happens when good storytelling takes a backseat to heavy-handed political lectures. When a movie or show feels like a didactic social justice lesson rather than an immersive story, it breaks the universe's internal logic and alienates the audience. Worse, studios have learned to weaponize these progressive themes as a shield against legitimate artistic criticism. If fans reject a project because the script is terrible, the pacing is off, or the franchise lore is broken, executives can simply point to their messaging and dismiss the entire backlash as toxic bigotry. It allows them to dodge accountability for making a bad product by hiding behind a social cause.

BackpackingSurfer

The entire structure of the AMD/Meta deal is not to scale meta’s compute power, meta gets 160 million shares of AMD to buy the MI450’s, it’s a pay me to buy deal where meta gets to diversify their portfolio with subsidized compute while AMD gets backed by a hyper scaler. That’s only bullish for Meta. Meta gets low cost compute supply, with Meta compute PR’s a few days ago, it’s literally a play to drive down costs of spot compute, this hurts neocloud margins.

MKeo713

I think people greatly misunderstand what’s going on at Meta. A couple major points come to mind: Yes Meta wanted to make one of or the best frontier model. But was their idea ever to follow the business model of OpenAI / Anthropic? Given they were open source from the beginning it seems clear to me that was never the plan. Instead they intend to use their models inside their own suite of products to make them more profitable. Why this approach? Meta is scarred from the shift from the web to mobile, where Apple gouged their profits simply because “hey we own the phone you’re on you have no power”. Meta even tried developing their own smartphone for this very reason. They don’t want their generative AI to be a wrapper on top of someone else’s product, they have a cash cow and need to maintain control over as many aspects of it as possible. Same reason Google developed chrome rather than existing solely on someone else’s browser. Mark saying agents aren’t where they want it to be certainly isn’t a good signal, but again take it in context. This is the same guy whose biggest compliment to his employees has been calling something “not bad”. This dude’s a harsh critic, and that’s horrible for PR when everyone else is gassing up their companies. But it doesn’t immediately indicate “wow we suck and our product is a total failure”. Yes they have lost the LLM race if you mean in terms of selling API access. No they haven’t failed in generative AI, and their continued ads growth is a testament to that. Meta takes swings, they look for opportunities in the future. Their AR glasses are an attempt to be a key player in the next platform (and I do think this will start to replace our phones over time). Not all bets work out (Metaverse, crypto wallet, facephone) but the fact that they consistently try and aren’t afraid to play dirty makes me a strong believer they’ll be around for a long time. I don’t like the company morally, but man is it a good investment 

o-p-q

I’m curious what makes you think the spectrum usage is so limited, because I haven’t heard any analysts/redditors/news or official RKLB PR mention such limitations. I feel like there must be more to the story.

javierphoenix

I believe we conceptually know how AI can exponentially improve operations and reduce cost. We understand its applications in workforce scheduling, procurement, financial analysis (comptroller), facility security, notes taking with triggered actions, market studies, decision-making by incorporating information from multiple perspectives, internal application development, customer service, revenue cycle, contract management, etc. And this is the case for Medium to Large-size companies. The integration of custom-designed AI with multiple levels of database integration takes time and stakeholder buy in to ensure the cost, privacy/compliance, cybersecurity, accuracy, scalability, governance, and quality dimensions are considered. At a higher level, HR, Upskilling, Workforce Management and Development, Business Retention, PR and Marketing, Concept Development and Strategy may be enhanced by using AI in the market and complexity it’s adoption is causing. I think thats where companies like cognizant come into play, by developing custom turnkey solutions, or a standardized approach to revamping all needed perspectives.

vagobond45

Are you his PR rep:)?

Ok_Ground9015

CXAI is coiled hard. No volume to speak of. Shorts are trapped. FTDs continue to rise. Revenue PR is needed in order for it to move. Management remains oddly silent. It's a waiting game/hostage situation. Retail is holding what they have.

Miserable_Mine_4189

You probably have more interest in this than me and know more. I am not following that closely. But seems more theatrical than anything, a squeeze adjacent PR event. Waymo is pivoting to doordash right? Was more waymo pulling away rather than uber pulling away?

cottonballpennies

The merger was meant to close last year, they don’t give proper updates. Now a portion of the merger needs to be sold off. Their debt without merger is 1.1b, it’s been decreased by $800m since the IPO, which is a good sign, but have a negative multiple because they keep getting squeezed on debt payment. They refinanced in 2 years at 14% interest, assuming they don’t need to do that if they can pay off faster but subscriptions are flat. Also, the perplexity and OpenAI PR releases were identical copies. Perplexity had the stock jump almost 300% pre market and drop into the red once market opened. They didn’t provide financials. That deal closed 6 months ago, and for the last 2 earnings they still have no revenue to show for it. One promising thing they mentioned that came out true from last earnings is they said they have ongoing AI contracts to finalize and would let everyone know soon. OpenAI was one of them that we found out last week, so I am guessing another big one is around the corner. However, even if they said they’re working with someone like Anthropic, what are the financials. We need to see numbers or this will continue decline.

Valkorion335786

If you didn’t have a Magnavox 19PR14 C221 TV growing up, just skip the GTA 6 release It’s not for you

Ok_Ground9015

I don't mind holding it. What irks me, is the quietness/secrecy. The annual shareholder meeting was without substance. The 2.0 launch fizzled. 2 more Fortune 500 contracts, but they won't say who the companies are. They have good things going, like the tripling of the revenue, the acquisition, a strong ER coming in August. SaaS is good money with all those clients. But the PR that is put out leaves much to be desired.

Ok_Ground9015

PR naming the 2 new Fortune 500 contracts possibly. We're still expecting some forward looking revenue statements as well. Any PR to keep the shareholders informed until August ER.

Ok_Wealth_3433

Haven’t even announced JLEO PR… this is going way way higher

Ok_Wealth_3433

When ASTS announces the JLEO PR, stock is going back to ATH by end of July

trake17

I think the issue is that they were likely expecting to only negotiate and sign the Mo I Rana lease, but sounds like the counter-party is interested in the full pipeline. That would drastically extend the timeline of negotiating a signed deal imo. However, I also think they picked the tenant and have been actively negotiating with them well before this PR announcement and they're in the last stages of finalizing the full agreement. The frequency of the 6K filings seems to point to very active polishing and I'd expect the definitive details of an executed agreement in the next week or two. They just didn't want the June 30th deadline to go by silently and have investors get nervous, so they had to drop something. Seems like incredibly bullish news given the expanded terms, even with pushing back the timeline a bit.

slipsbups

Wendy's PR has been the subject of good memes for a while. Definitely could go full doge.

Maxdiegeileauster

But they are also doing it for openai, doesn't really seem like a PR stunt anymore

kadsmald

Isn’t that just a PR move by Anthropic to get people to think highly of their product

mightyblend

I'd feel better if the company had any idea how to handle PR, like, at all. (I am holding bags.)

Heavy_Nothing_1158

Interesting angle here is that Walmart is not exactly a vibes-based buyer. If they are signing 15-year nuclear PPAs, it says the clean-power premium is becoming less about PR and more about power-price insurance. The CEG bull case still has to clear the boring bits: contracted prices, capex, regulatory headaches, and whether hyperscaler-style demand actually spills over to normal corporate buyers. But Walmart showing up does make the story a little less 'AI data centers need infinite electricity, please clap.'

Forte69

SpaceX will be fine without him. They are now of strategic value to the US military, which is why he’s been distanced from decision making. Tesla are also sufficiently well established that he doesn’t really add anything beyond PR for halo models that never get built.

169Huntingwood

It never gets old with you people thinking these china holding companies are legitmate businesses. Their entire purpose is to get insiders rich. The reason it pumped at the beginning of June is because of an offering they gave to select investors earlier. They will put out a PR, or manipulate the algos into pumping it then they will sell on that pump. In this case, it is very highly likely they were selling these shares at the beginning on June: [https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1852440/000121390026007481/ea0274058-6k\_jianzhi.htm](https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1852440/000121390026007481/ea0274058-6k_jianzhi.htm) That would also explain the large red candles I see on the 30m timeframe. Same thing with QMMM. They did an offering back in June 2025 for 40M shares at 20 cents when the stock is trading at a dollar. Then they PR crypto and it shoots to over 300. There's only one purpose for this, soon you were gonna see a huge knife on them selling those 40M shares but they were halted before they could sell it all.

hombredesal

*(I accidentally responded to my own post instead of your comment a week ago.)* Not what I expected as a response to my questions, but I’ll take it. You might be onto something. They’ve probably focused their R&D on making it effective at taking down drones, not making it as durable as possible. I don’t think that will be as much of a factor for LSAD as it would for standard equipment though. My impression has always been that the final product will be an attachment to something else or some kind of autonomous device because of how often the company has previously described it as scalable and versatile. Their 6/11 PR also mentioned how they’re currently on additional mounted system configurations, e.g., pallet-mounted system, crawler-mounted system. Obviously, your other points are still valid regarding whether it’s easy to repair, and how adaptable it really is in a military setting. To that end, I’m not sure. It’s possible the thing will shatter like glass if someone trips over it or explode when a little dust kicks up. However, I also doubt those concerns haven’t been raised at least once after several years of development and summit/expo showings. (And now we’re back to speculating on outcomes.) Regardless, I guess we’ll hear really soon if it flunks the demonstrations.

Grouchy-Rice5631

look at all the data on the trial? You have PR already?

Oatmeal_Raisin_

Well even the potential of a few percent of customers is a big deal for those that are particularly PR conscious. Its additional risk that is and should be considered. On top of that, there also the erosion in trust from US allies; they now want to focus more on their own solutions if there are even remotely similar offerings offered regionally, particularly in Europe.

JustCuriousForStocks

“We are entering the 27th month since the last patient enrolled in a trial with a disease that kills in 6-10 months. Dosing ad infinitum was added in the third phase and they requested to increase time between doses \*in years two and three\* What oncology med can say that? None. That’s all you need to know, at this point you either believe in the science fully or you never will. Have some conviction. I haven’t cared about a model since the 72 PR in December and I’ve got a 7 bagger and a $1.1M gain going, check my post history. I couldn’t care less about a model and I’m still adding every chance that I can. At this point Sterg nuking bear FUD like BAT mOS 14-16 at the fireside chat, this 8k signaling future change of ownership housekeeping as well as the 150M ATM shelf offering with TD Cowan are more bullish to me than any model ever could be. The writing is on the wall, either double down or hold.”

deepserket

Daily reminder that Ed Zitron is a PR guy, why are you listening to him?

Arrosis

Really hope they start revealing the Fortune 500 companies or some contracts soon. The PR yesterday was such a nothingburger.

PromotionDull8663

There are some flaws in your argument. Layoffs were never AI; thats just what companies say to look good aka PR. The whole narrative of AI to lay off people was just to market. Go up to any random person and they can tell you ChatGPT(recognized product) is taking jobs. - Its all narrative. While I agree its not as great as they say (just like any product truely), the demand IS there. Look at all the hyperscalers and Neoclouds. They're literally running max compute currently. Revenue going circular...is a problem but also not as much as it seems. I mean thats kinda how the economy/capitalism works. The real problem is companies taking stake/equity in the companies theyre investing in to pump the stock/numbers. Buying actual product though is no different, just goes through less hands.

mightyblend

Truly. Also I'm not a PR professional, but this whole week has been missed opportunities that even I would have seen coming.

SignificanceLate7002

Starting to see penny stocks put out PR that they're taking equity stakes in SPCX. QUCY today. There was another one yesterday, forget the ticker name. It's cooked.

Arrosis

CXAI 2.0 PR was such a nothingburger. No mentions of the Fortune 500 companies. No revenue figures. No disclosure of any contracts. No 8K filed. It was just a long wall of text for no reason. What are you doing CEO?

Provolone-Jones

All of you will share my outrage at 🥭 sending oil to $69 as a PR stunt when we face the fast approaching and horrific reality of running out of oil.

Achillies2heel

AI memory boom wasnt a thing until late 2025. Micron exited the consumer memory space, had bad PR off of it and I dipped. I am very much an AI skeptic personally (bubble incoming). Eventually the shovel makers will stop printing dollars of big tech or so I keep telling myself.

CallShot7029

No, TLDR he had a yelling session with all the Republican Senators yesterday, then stopped another, popular bill because he wants he’s voting act passed. He needs something and he also made a PR mess yesterday. So after the berating yesterday, if Trump says he wants a bill done I think it gets done.

Relevant-Goal-3008

CXAI cope time. If the Fortune 500 companies mentioned in the 2.0 PR are material non-public information (which they almost certainly are), CXAI will have to disclose them via a Reg FD 8-K rather than just a press release (which they haven't done yet and would likely do AH).  Hoping for an 8-K filed after 4pm ET today under Item 7.01 or 8.01 with Exhibit 99.1. If that drops with company names, it's boom time. If close happens and there's nothing, then the 2.0 announcement was treated as a standalone press release and welp, we're all suckers.  NFA DYOR

ptexpat

# CMC Reports Third Quarter of Fiscal 2026 Results PR Newswire Thu, June 25, 2026 at 3:45 AM PDT 28 min read * **Third quarter net earnings of $173.0 million, or $1.55 per diluted share and adjusted earnings of $193.0 million, or $1.73 per diluted share** * **Consolidated core EBITDA increased 78.6% year-over-year to $353.6 million** **due to strong market conditions, increasing benefits from Transform, Advance, Grow ("TAG")** **initiatives, and the contribution of the recently acquired precast businesses** * **Consolidated core EBITDA margin of 14.2% increased by 440 basis points compared to the prior year period**  * **Reduced net leverage; clear visibility to <2x well ahead of the stated goal of mid-2027** IRVING, Texas, June 25, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- CMC (NYSE: CMC) (the "Company") today announced financial results for its fiscal third quarter ended May 31, 2026. [](https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/382643/CMC_Logo_NEW_2023.html) [www.CMC.com](http://www.CMC.com) **CEO Commentary** "During our fiscal third quarter, we continued to make great progress on our strategic agenda across a number of fronts," said Peter Matt, President and Chief Executive Officer. "We substantially grew Core EBITDA, and made meaningful progress deleveraging our balance sheet. Our early-stage construction portfolio is benefiting from solid demand, along with strong booking and backlogs at attractive prices. The commercial and operating rigor that define CMC, together with the growing benefits of our TAG program, position the Company to deliver strong results in the fourth quarter and beyond."

abroadbroadband

JP Morgan is having a PR nightmare of a year huh

alexwallst19

Wendy’s has a low PR, that’s an investment.

Mminas

Anthropic has always been a PR heavy firm. There is literally no other company that could make news out of two engineers changing jobs in an ecosystem with thousands of engineers.

Relevant-Goal-3008

It's honestly a weird time to get into them. The rules changed on day trading recently, and while it's slowing down compared to earlier in the month, there's been a very large uptick on pump and dumps, kind of like crypto experienced in 2023 (and 2020 I guess) with meme coins. This has mostly been with random crap risking being delisted or Chinese holding companies. In my opinion, it's not ever going to be similar to blue chip big time stock investment. Short to medium term, unless it's something you're really interested in and confident in. The name of the game has in my experience been a rotation of industries getting the attention, where they will have good PR or something and the stock would increase, and sometimes find a new baseline - other times plummet because everyone was just waiting for their chance to sell. This is rambling and NFA. Lurk for a while, keep in mind this sub especially has gotten more gamble-y recently, and do any due diligence on anything you plan on investing serious money on. 

Physical_Anteater941

Don't let Wendys Become Annie! On the surface, Wendy and Annie have a lot in common. Their red hair and freckles, wealthy old fellas handling their PR(Dave and Daddy Warbucks.) But underneath the obvious are starkly different ginger gals. Fact, Wendy  invented The Frosty and The Baconater, Annie never invented shit! Fact, Wendy has been their for me when I've made horrible financial and life choices. While Annie, who is from the streets, gutter trash, has never employed a single person, not one. Fact Annies movie and play sucked ass. Fact, Wendys slings baked potatoes out the back door like true hustler! Support the cause, don't let Wendy become like Annie!

Ok_Ground9015

It may be a good sign that there is PR coming AH. I rode it down to .13 before the acquisition earlier this month. 

NerdsOfSteel74

Didn’t put any money into ADTX but I’d put money on the whole thing being an op arranged by a PR firm hired by management to stave off delisting.

AveryPritzi

If Wendy's was real good, their PR person would fire up Twitter again and start posting

silverfutes

Wendy's needs a new PR campaign. They need to stop coddling progressives (they poor) and reboot Wendy as a 24yr old french fry dipping baddie in a chicken nugget bikini.

Ok_Ground9015

If they wait until it gets back down to \~.17, they may be able to get it back to .30. Had they followed the momentum, or even released PR or a date when it was at .27, it would have given it a nice boost to get to where they're trying to go. But no. The car is out of gas on the side of the road and we're a long way from the next gas station.

Relevant-Goal-3008

I've been on team CXAI here for months now and I'm losing patience. June is almost over, they better swoop in with PR naming every big client they have AND unveiling 2.0 in the next week or they're doomed 

BeginningRoad1661

You can’t convince me CXAI has massive insider buying AND a big PR coming up. Under 1 million volume at open, .20 cent stock. That’s basically dead

OldLocksmith8307

Dude. That's what Antropic said 2 days before the Fable ban: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-06-10/anthropic-ceo-says-government-should-be-able-to-block-new-models After a few months of fear mongering for PR and blocking competition

EmbarrassedPart1256

I can't believe I'm saying this but I think I'm gonna load 100 shares of $CTM to DCA, set & forget type of thing. [They recently PR'ed](https://investors.castellumus.com/news/news-details/2026/Castellum-to-Present-at-Maxim-Group-Defense-Tech-and-Domestic-Supply-Chain-Virtual-Conference-on-June-25/default.aspx) that they're going to a Maxim pump & dump defense conference. The two typos at the front & center of [their IR page](https://investors.castellumus.com/overview/default.aspx) still blow my mind... "Our unique capabilities...***give us unique capabilities*** to ***DELIVERY*** comprehensive solutions?" https://preview.redd.it/mdkekghuh79h1.png?width=1812&format=png&auto=webp&s=96c8a22836d24c4e235ad5c35020f84647cea9a6

Ok_Ground9015

CXAI: 8-K filed yesterday. CEO and Director of the Board both bought a fat grip of shares. Possible PR today (1 in 5 chance).

KawasakiFever223

Im a owner op too. I believe we get a PR within the next couple of weeks

wellfelchmedead

ASX:PR1 bro easy

Bill_Clintons_Desk5

Had to fire PR to afford lettuce

TestingThrowaway100

Two brands impervious to bad PR wanting to merge is bad PR. 

thehindermost

Constellation already operates like 20% of US nuclear capacity, so they don't need SMRs to make this deal work, they're just selling power from existing plants. The SMR angle is a different timeline entirely, probably 2030s at earliest. Curious if anyone here has looked at whether the 15-year contract structure actually moves the needle for CEG or if it's just good PR.

morbidgames

A penny stock with no PR since Mar 2025, no open positions/career page, and their site is investor focused after being around since 2017. Yikes!

BeginningRoad1661

It’s been building. They have a supposed PR coming out by the end of the month. Will create a huge sell the news

rickster9

He didn’t rug pull us cause he didn’t sell any shares. All that happened was the company released a PR about the merger being finalized and consumed. People sold the news, whatever. We hold strong and get paid in due time

PmMeYourAdhd

I havent been to a Wendy's since a couple weeks before they started "dynamic pricing" and rolled out a whole gaslighting PR campaign to pretend that was going to give a discount when they're slow and not jjst a scheme to test the market to keep prices as high as possible as long as possible. If I have to look at some dumbass advertising and spyware app i dont want, just to see how much the food costs, that's too dystopian corporate hell-hole for me. If they've discontinued that, I dont know it, because they were dead to me the second they rolled that out. Their food was mid and I will hate them forever for trying to dynamic price fast food. I hope they fail.

Ok_Bunch_6334

I have 23,000 shares. I am planning to hold until they release the 150m $ PR.

blazing_straddles

In the penny stock world its all about PR and headlines. Numerous companies out there loudly buying back stock and yet somehow their sharecount grows year after year. You are pinning your hopes on a technology solution that is right now basically a power point presentation. They will likely need more than $10M to get it off the ground.

MrStaraptor

That June PR better hit, we're the 22nd

johnnyshots22

TGE news on Stocktitan regarding the share repurchase plan and a seperate PR regarding the locked up shares. Volume creeping up slowly. Great entry price .

aytikvjo

Largely true - bottom 50% of earners only account for about 3% of income tax revenue which as a whole accounts for about 50% of the tax that the government collects That bottom 50% does, however, account for about 12% of all payroll taxes collected which is a fairly large chunk of the tax collected by the government. You can make up for that by taxing the higher income tiers more and how to do that is more of a political problem than an economic one, but the math works out to about 5-6% of the total tax revenue collected by the government you'd have to cover. personally I think the whole thing is a PR move by Bezos, but the statistics are largely correct despite there being a bit more to the full picture.

hombredesal

Not what I expected as a response to my questions, but I’ll take it. You might be onto something. They’ve probably focused their R&D on making it effective at taking down drones, not making it as durable as possible. I don’t think that will be as much of a factor for LSAD as it would for standard equipment though. My impression has always been that the final product will be an attachment to something else or some kind of autonomous device because of how often the company has previously described it as scalable and versatile. Their 6/11 PR also mentioned how they’re currently on additional mounted system configurations, e.g., pallet-mounted system, crawler-mounted system. Obviously, your other points are still valid regarding whether it’s easy to repair, and how adaptable it really is in a military setting. To that end, I’m not sure. It’s possible the thing will shatter like glass or explode when a little dust kicks up. However, I also doubt those concerns haven’t been raised at least once after several years of development and summit/expo showings. Regardless, I guess we’ll hear really soon if it flunks the demonstrations.

infinitewaters107

Whenever billionaires like Zucc or Gates say they’ll give 99% of it to charity when they’re gone. But then they still sail in mega yachts and buy 1 million square foot heated mansions in Palo Alto.  wtf??? Of course you can’t take any of that money with you. I’d be more impressed if you gave it all away while you were still alive 😂. That’s wanting to buy a PR image without actually being inconvenienced. 

maximuminimum

PR task force gotta get these bearish journalists outta here

ARazorbacks

Musk’s PR team cultivated a mythology around him. Without them he’s a poor marketer with awful delivery. He just fills his remarks with jargon meant to make people think he knows what he’s talking about. I also think his autism (he’s definitely somewhere on the spectrum) gives his speech a weird cadence. My impression is he uses the weird cadence and jargon to come off as a smart guy searching for the right words to convey his awesome ideas.  You can clearly see in the timeline when he stopped listening to the PR team. That cave diver nonsense was such an unforced error…  The cave diver incident is who Musk really is. 

JuculianD

Yeah, was a great PR stunt, it turned backwards, but as my autistic friend never admits hes wrong, Musk on ketamine hired a private investigator to talk shit about the diver. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/oct/08/elon-musk-diver-vernon-unsworth-pedo-idiot

LowBread9264

You mean the PR stunt that wasn’t meant to be actually used?