Reddit Posts
ZScaler - still riding high and not profitable
Fidelity National Information Services
$AABB Huge DD package that points this company in the right direction..a must read!
Up 1000% and more Thank you SSL! Sell or hold?
SSL and UCO long term. Bought at covid crash 2020. Sheesh time flies
5 Top Weekly TSX Performers: Entree and Turquoise Hill Up After Oyu Tolgoi News
What Buy/Sell indicators do you use?
GoDaddy discloses recent security breach that exposed 1.2 million accounts
Sasol (SSL) Energy: Oil & Gas is Undervalued
Easiest way to register your shares
"Glacier Capital" DOES exist. Buy because you like the stock, not because of conspiracy theories held together with ducktape.
Guide: Getting Schwab's StreetSmart Edge running on your Pi
Mentions
Lmfao. I've made Python scripts with ChatGPT 5.1 just fine. Only to discover that the previous devops engineer baked a Let's Encrypt SSL into the build agents. They manually set the REQUESTS_CA_Bundle with a free .crt generated from Let's Encrypt. Turns out I shouldn't touch or upgrade the request module or any SSL related packages in the requirements.txt. Because when you do that, the .crt will go poof. AI saved me time browsing the dredge called StackOverflow. But AI will never know when, where, and how to implement code. That will forever be a human, or at least, a sentient task to be done. You are talking bullshit old man. And if a company decides to lay me off? Good luck with AI trying to find land mines like that.
They sold their SSL certificate business to Symantec many years ago. Their cash cow is running the .COM registry where they get a percentage of every domain name (over 100M .com alone) on an annual basis when they renew.
Tldr. They found a limited way to have more shares available. But now they are in the SEC SSL so think twice if doing illegal naked short selling. Stocks right is making them burn those available shares which are like fuel for them opposing us apes. The more we puah the more the burn placing this again in potential short squeeze scenario which is the play we all doing here. So buy/hold or do both
Yeah but then new keys are issued and you can have a trusted key authority like we already do for things like SSL
Too much of my portfolio is typed up in $NEXT, $AMPY, $VG and $SSL. I had DNN but sold to average down on NEXT. I think all four of these plays are undervalued and VG is being manipulated by MM
"Quantum breakthrough makes all SSL traffic decryptable"
Why would you imply iterating on a technology is a bad thing? Are cars irrelevant? The global crypto market cap is approaching $4T, you're implying that it's all illicit? If you're 401k is invested in a broad S&P500 index fund, then you yourself are already invested in crypto. Entire nations are building crypto reserves, including the US. It is annoying to use directly, which is why it's mainly used in the backend of services. Just like a thousand other internet-based technologies like SSL or TCP.
$MDB MongoDB is trash and the Indian CEO is pretty much a scammer. He is lying like he breathes. He and the company will most likely end up in lawsuit. They also have no more tech advantage… I have 3 main reasons why MongoDB will end worthless. The quotes in reason 1 and 2 are just from investor meeting from 18.09.2025, so pretty much new and you can watch it at YouTube at MongoDB‘s channel. Only by listening CEO‘s one single speech it was enough for me to understand he is a big liar (yes, I am back-end software engineer and I use all databases). ⸻ Reason 1: No tech advantage anymore while Hyperscalers eating MongoDB up • CEO Quote: “There’s limits to what these platforms can do because they were not architected from day one to be a native JSON database.” → Lie: PostgreSQL JSONB has been mature since 2014, widely used, and more powerful (especially with relational + json support it is hybrid, MongoDB is not!). And, and, and it is free! Even OpenAI is using Postgre… • CEO Quote: “We offer a semantic engine and a lexical search engine.” → Lie: Atlas Search is just Lucene — the same engine used by Elasticsearch, OpenSearch, etc. Not unique at all. • CEO Quote: “We also offer world class embedding and reranking models.” → Lie: Mongo only recently bolted on vector search. Pinecone, Weaviate, Milvus, AWS, Azure, GCP are far ahead. Mongo is catching up, not leading. ⸻ Reason 2: CEO keeps blatantly lying, speaks half-truth and presented wrong charts yesterday in Investor Meeting • CEO Quote: “In Postgres, if you add JSON support. Any document over two kilobytes in size has to do something called off-row storage… adds performance overhead.” → Lie: Half-truth. TOAST applies to all large fields (TEXT, BYTEA, XML), not just JSON. Overhead is minimal unless constantly querying huge JSON blobs. • CEO Quote: “You want to be trusted that you’re secure, available, and performant in demanding use cases.” → Lie: Half-truth. Hyperscalers’ DBs (DynamoDB, CosmosDB, Bigtable) are more trusted for mission-critical workloads. Mongo criticized for cost, scaling, and licensing. • Investor Presentation Slide: Postgres marked “X” under Flexible Model. → Lie: PostgreSQL supports relational tables and unstructured JSONB. Often more flexible. • Investor Presentation Slide: Postgres marked “X” under Native Queryable Encryption. → Lie: PostgreSQL already supports pgcrypto, SSL/TLS, TDE forks. Not unique to MongoDB. • Investor Presentation Slide: Postgres marked “X” under Run Anywhere. → Lie: PostgreSQL runs everywhere (bare metal, Docker, VMs, Kubernetes, managed clouds). • Investor Presentation Slide: Postgres marked “X” under Managed Offering. → Lie: Every cloud has managed Postgres (Supabase, Timescale, Neon, Crunchy, AlloyDB). • Investor Presentation Slide: Postgres marked “X” under Scaling & Sharding. → Lie: Postgres has sharding via Citus, CockroachDB, Yugabyte. Advantage shrinking. ⸻ Reason 3: Stock setup is broken and valuation insane • Stock has already been removed from an index, losing passive inflows. • Price action weak, volume extremely low, no retail interest. • MongoDB did buybacks with no real cash flow just to support price, while insiders keep dumping (0 insider buys in history). • CEO himself said DB market is $100B+, but MongoDB has <2% share. Despite that, its market cap is $27B — massively overpriced. • Forward P/E ~80, even higher than AWS, Microsoft, Google, Oracle — all of which dominate DB market with real profitability
New regards app dropped. Mf doesn't even have a SSL certificate for their website.
My calls going into next week; INTC, OPEN, SOFI, NIO, BULL, BTBT, ONDS, SSL, EQX, HTZ My puts are already fukked bc being ber is tarded
cool thanks for the pointer! And the SSL seems to work again.
I renewed our SSL Cert a month ago, can't believe some browsers are still showing a warning :( [About SqueezeFinder – Squeeze Finder](https://squeeze-finder.com/about-squeezefinder/) has all the info about our platform, thanks!
No working SSL? Can you give a bit more info on Squeeze Finder? What does it offer? How does it work?
These guys??? Who can’t even properly secure their own internet facing site. If you can’t secure your own SSL cert, but you claim to put out reports that talk about companies and their “safety” in the market, do you really think we should listen to these fucking clowns 🤡? It takes 1-2hrs to buy and secure an internet facing site with a SSL certificate. How long did it take them to write the $RKLB coverage? https://preview.redd.it/ewt95pamxrff1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ac12f151062c42f6169a0e32432ebe241cee5885
Not sure where that "hounded" opinion comes from. Moxie has been well respected in the security community going back to his early DEFCON days with his SSL attacks.
Just following up on this. Unfortunately, my analysis is taking longer than I thought. My curl https request couldn't verify that Google's SSL certs were up-to-date & ultimately my RAM underclocked itself.
Registered a couple domains earlier this year and ALL providers overcharge for SSL so I went with Let's Encrypt. Wouldn't touch VRSN.
if i understand correctly, so long as there are mms are culling retailers, this is alpha. thank you for sharing, it's a beautiful strategy. i have some technical questions, if you're willing to entertain: 1. it seems to me that stop losses on options, if set, should be percentage based. for example RH nudges to sell your option if it dips below 20% with a pop-up. i assume your chart is 1D or shorter. i can't imagine most retailers are monitoring their calls/puts daily to detect to set their stop losses manually by looking for "test dips" (where you've marked "SSL"). could you provide me with a counterpoint to why this thesis is wrong? 2. are there specific days exit liquidity tends to happen? i would guess it happens on expiry date (probably on retailers playing 0DTEs), since theta decay would make the options cheap for the mms to scoop. 3. the last sentence of your first paragraph suggests this happens more often than what i had in mind. how do you identify stocks on where this happens, and how frequently would you say it happens? or do you exclusively trade this strategy on SPY? 4. how do you detect if mm's take the liquidity? is there a spike in volume? 5. how long do you hold your positions? what are the indicators to sell?
# **TLDR** --- **Ticker:** SOFI **Direction:** Down **Prognosis:** Sold Puts (short position) **Reasoning:** Technical indicators (SSL channel breakdown, Accumulation/Distribution near zero, bearish Money Flow divergence, bearish MACD cross) suggest a bearish trend. Fundamental analysis adds weight with a recent downgrade to "underperform" and a $12 price target. **Expiration:** January 3, 2024 (as shown in image) **Disclaimer:** OP is new to options trading. Your mileage may vary (and probably will).
> Quantum computing is seen as the crypto killer Seen as such by whom? Naive investors? Bitcoin (and other major chains) have had quantum-resistant updates proposed and specced out for years. The network can update to a quantum resistant algorithm when the time comes. Quantum can't break our current modes of encryption, and crypto won't be the first target when it does. If quantum is attacking Bitcoin, TLS/SSL (aka the foundation of the modern internet) would already be cooked and the current banking/payment networks would have already been compromised. Crypto is safer from quantum than the current HTTPS infrastructure, because crypto can pivot to a new algorithm in a matter of hours whilst the international banking system has no such mechanism.
Honestly, I wouldn't count on AI hitting any wall soon. There's a possibility as always but for the past decade, every time there's a bottleneck in the field there's a new paradigm shift keeping the ball rolling. Hardware wall? Specialized hardware like dedicated GPUs and now TPUs kept it rolling. Storage wall? Quantization, pruning and other forms of compression. Algorithmic? Deep learning, better transformers, inference improvements. We had multi-modal AI with the current models the same way we ended up moving to multi-core processing after the transistor wall. It will keep going imo, maybe even exponentially especially with neuromorphic models and SSL being developed and refined. I'm not sure about NVIDIA's role in the future of the space as other companies are catching up with new exciting developments in AI tech but I'm not convinced the AI space itself is going to hit a wall that isn't economical in scale. Right now increasingly energy costs are looming over the space but we are already seeing players in the field investing in stuff like Nuclear energy and fusion to solve it.
I think you're missing the analysis on SSLs. They're getting theirs. They're implementing surcharges after the fact on all containers delayed at USEC ports. I don't think it's that big of a deal for MSC, Maersk, Hapag or any SSL except for the perception of traders. Who it's really going to hurt is large importers like Walmart, Ikea, Samsung and similar companies.
What would be the advantage of starting at the sensors? After all in the end you get a digital photo that's made up of ones and zeros, and you can always modify it to bypass any security measures (as long as the security process has been reverse engineered). Server timestamps would also provide little to no security (you could simply request them for the fake photo). Even if a working solution was created, I think it would cause even more harm than good, because those who would benefit the most from faking photos (e.g. opposing political parties or foreign powers (Russia, China, North Korea)) would find out a way to mark an AI generated photo as verified, no matter how costly or hard it would be. The average person would be made to believe that the verification process is almost impossible to crack, so they'd trust any photo with the verification mark — that's a malicious actor's goal. If the process is intellectually hard but not computationally intensive, then it's not enough. Programs get cracked/hacked because they're *just obfuscated*; someone with enough skill and time can bypass all restrictions. Cryptographic security on the other hand is pragmatically completely infeasible (e.g. it'd take a billion years to crack an SSL connection that lasts a few hours/days) no matter if you have access to the best supercomputers on Earth (although quantum computers may change it in the future)
I genuinely hope this works but I have no faith in it. I did some DD and said not for me. PS. It was once called Globalstar and SSL set it up https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globalstar#:~:text=According%20to%20documents%20filed%20with,and%20duplex%20data%20service%20in
They're still called steamship lines (SSL) in international logistics. I'm CEO of an international logistics company and that's the term used...but no they don't use steam anymore. It's actually bunker fuel which is made from what's left after they make diesel and gasoline. It burns very dirty.
It is commonplace, especially on the logistics/brokerage side, to still refer to them as steam ship lines (SSL)
> Do you even realize what you quoted? Like just read the first line "An Extended Validation (EV) certificate is a type of TLS/SSL certificate". You are quoting what a web certificate is. Do you think you use a web certificate for signing kernel mode drivers? lmao Yeah, sorry. I completely fucked up and pulled the EV cert definition. The process requires two certificates, an SPC and an Embedded Signature from the Microsoft Hardware Dev Center. The SPC process is mostly the same as an EV SSL certificate. It does not require any interaction with Microsoft, nor is it Cross-Signed anymore. Instead, the Embedded Signature now comes solely from the Microsoft Cert Authority. > Okay and a usermode application cannot access kernel mode APIs. To access them you need a signed kernel driver. No where does that document state it is only for User Mode applications. That document is for all software that competes with Microsoft built software, including Microsoft Defender, which uses Kernel Mode APIs, thus Kernel Mode APIs fall under that document. > "crowdstrike used their software license to publish unlicensed product" Never once did I call the product Unlicensed. I stated that Microsoft is not allowed to control access to kernel mode API's. There is a verification process for signing kernel-mode drivers, but if a company - IE: CloudStrike, writes a Kernel Mode Driver, then their software causes said driver to crash - That is no fault of the MS certification process. MS is only responsible for passing the Kernel Mode Driver thru the HLK Validation process. They do not control, test, or validate any software written ontop of those drivers. So the issue is: * Kernel Mode Driver (CrowdStrike Falcon) has full Kernel Mode API access * CrowdStrike builds driver to run Definition Files at runtime * Definition files ARE NOT validated thru WHQL * Driver passes WHQL tests * CrowdStrike builds bad definition file that tells Kernel Mode API to run bad code Dave Plummer (previous Windows developer) does a really good job of breaking down how this problem likely occurred. This problem solely exists on the CrowdStrike side - [CrowdStrike IT Outage Explained by a Windows Developer (youtube.com)](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wAzEJxOo1ts)
> Getting an EV certificate has nothing to do with Microsoft. The process is completely out of their hands. First of all I did not say anything about Microsoft to begin with, second every single valid EV certificate is cross signed by microsoft, and as of 2021 microsoft is the sole provider of kernel mode signatures. > That document outlines the way in which Microsoft must conduct business in the EU, including their Interoperability Commitment to allow third-party software to access the same API's that Microsoft uses to build competing software. Okay and a usermode application cannot access kernel mode APIs. To access them you need a signed kernel driver. > This is why Kernel Level APIs are available on Windows. Kernel level APIs are available for kernel level drivers. To access them you need a signed kernel driver. Do I have to remind what your claim was? "crowdstrike used their software license to publish unlicensed product" and "This was only possible because of EU regulation", which is vehemently false. You cannot publish an unsigned driver. > When the company applies for an EV certificate through any of the certificate authorities, the difference is the validation that they are a legitimate business with legitimate needs for an EV certificate. Do you even realize what you quoted? Like just read the first line "An Extended Validation (EV) certificate is a type of TLS/SSL certificate". You are quoting what a web certificate is. Do you think you use a web certificate for signing kernel mode drivers? lmao
Getting an EV certificate has nothing to do with Microsoft. The process is completely out of their hands. The document I linked is the agreement that Microsoft built with the EU. That document outlines the way in which Microsoft must conduct business in the EU, including their Interoperability Commitment to allow third-party software to access the same API's that Microsoft uses to build competing software. This is why Kernel Level APIs are available on Windows. EV certificate authentication does not include any sort of software validation thru Microsoft, vetting of said software, testing process, or anything beyond validation that when the company applies for an EV certificate, that they are a legitimate business with legitimate needs for an EV certificate. > An Extended Validation (EV) certificate is a type of TLS/SSL certificate that verifies that the certificate holder has undergone the most extensive level of vetting and identity background checks to certify that their website is authentic and legitimate. EV certificates are often required for high-profile brands, banks and other Fortune 500 companies. Extended validation means the certificate recipient and their website have completed a 16-point check to verify details such as: website domain, website owner, and the applicant’s legal, physical, and operational existence and identity.
EVERYBODY TALK ABOUT NVIDIA AMAZON TESLA AND ALL THAT SHIT BUT NOBODY IS TALKING ABOUT : # Sasol Limited (SSL) ARE YOU ALL BRAINLESS ?
SSL cert needs renewed, just expired today.
Fortinet has a lot of VPN alternatives too. SSL VPN is old tech (but required for many applications). It’s been under attack, especially recently- and Fortinet has had to patch it like mad. Thankfully, they also have a zero trust network access (ZTNA) configuration option as well as SASE - so when traditional VPN starts to fade, they will be ready. They have a great product set.
I had to work...there was a problem with one of the company's SSL certificates.
Was thinking about a Manley Nu Mu or SSL G Bus for the master chain. What you think
Short SSL stock. It’s a major oil company there
Just go into the config file and disable SSL, your boss won't notice. And by the time some Chinese hacker takes all your data hostage, you should be driving lambos into the sunset.
Had to go to SEC Edgar to look up company financials since I couldnt find them anywhere 🚩 15million long term debt 🚩 Website listed on Yahoo finance gives SSL error 🚩-12m share holders equity 🚩Diluting shares like crazy (taking value from share holders) 🚩 -300k net income Absolute garbage IMHO. Good luck
is there a better stock than SSL for Synthetic Fuel exposure?
Undervalued Israeli SSL that's capitalizing on a disaster. Assisting Israeli govt during Red Sea Crisis. Container rates rising, and new business opportunities are emerging. 2023 was a pretty loose freight market (cheap rates) compared to 2020-2022 covid prices. And 2024 is looking like freight prices are continuing to rise, especially on an election year. Overall a lot of moving vehicles that can send this stock to $25 by the end of the year.
A combination of dividend payout, bad news, energy market conditions and the general economy. SSL gets treated like any other defensive stock. Bad market/uncertainty it rises, good market it falls. This time it fell below its intrinsic value and is now rising to consolidate around it.
What's the deal with the SSL certificate?
Every Canadian LP CEO gets a golden parachute! The one I hate the most is SSL from HEXO that goon rekt shareholders and parachuted into Scrooge McDuck's vault.
J Pow said it himself in March when the banks collapsed. Things happen so much faster than before because of "social media". The digitalization of the finance world is a huge part of that. Information and currency moves much faster than it did a decade ago. People get the news and move their money so fast that central authorities can't act fast enough to prevent disasters like they could before. (lol, central planning is dumb anyway) Look, I'm not agreeing what the poster above you. I think crypto and even stablecoins have very little to do with it. But, cryptography as a discipline is what digital banking is built on. You login to your centralized bank using cryptographically signed tokens... that's what SSL is. So I'm saying cryptography does play a role, and perhaps that's what u/Unhappy-Goat5638 meant?? I dunno.
Malware site reported. Can’t even figure out an SSL while they hate on the worlds smartest most successful African American. Reported for racism as well. Malware and racism. Go outside. Make a friend. While you do nothing, he changes the world as we know it and advances technology the likes of which the world truly has never seen before. Believe me. Loser.
TLRY holder here. 1) dilution doesn't matter if its accretive. will it be? maybe 2) increasing authorized sharecount can prevent a hostile takeover. GGB tried to take over aphria in 2019. Irwin fought that off, doesnt hurt to take precautions. Especially now that the Montour's, AA, Surreyas are involved. They took over hexo by ousting SSL 3) i don't think anyone said this 4) saw diageo's planes in Leamington 5) maybe 1 6) $TLRY I was bearish on this news at first but reacted too quickly without reading the filings. Going to wait and see how this plays out. No point speculating
If you are on a work network, there could be something with the software they have installed on the machine or on the network that is causing the SSL certificates with the site to not work. This can be the case if the site used a new/old cert version that your companies security policy does not support (any longer)/(yet).
Hello all, There is this LTO Network company that is really company of great people I know many will now start flaming me because it is company that builds on blockchain. But company is building new way of digital collectibles called Ownables (It is NFT 2.0 actually and better than NFT 1.0 in many ways). They are also building Proofi, Universal Wallet, and like supper security comms on SSL. They are building GoLand project. And so many other projects are incoming. More about them you can find on their official webpage: https://www.ltonetwork.com/ Most of us jumped in on 20 times confirmed bottom! It is around 0.06-0.08 range and someone is EXTREMELY SHORTING US and pressuring us and we are constant losers and PROJECT IS not only "PROMISING" its delivering tech for new digital revolution! Please can you help us out and remove several of these guy that are shorting us! And we found out that CZ CEO of Binance is dumping us constantly to sustain his trash token BNB. And we are helpless, can this community jump in and help? Please!
Hello all, There is this LTO Network company that is really company of great people I know many will now start flaming me because it is company that builds on blockchain. But company is building new way of digital collectibles called Ownables (It is NFT 2.0 actually and better than NFT 1.0 in many ways). They are also building Proofi, Universal Wallet, and like supper security comms on SSL. They are building GoLand project. And so many other projects are incoming. More about them you can find on their official webpage: https://www.ltonetwork.com/ Most of us jumped in on 20 times confirmed bottom! It is around 0.06-0.08 range and someone is EXTREMELY SHORTING US and pressuring us and we are constant losers and PROJECT IS not only "PROMISING" its delivering tech for new digital revolution! Please can you help us out and remove several of these guy that are shorting us! And we found out that CZ CEO of Binance is dumping us constantly to sustain his trash token BNB. And we are helpless, can this community jump in and help? Please!
I know it's a bit more costly, but I've just gone back to newsgroups. Maxing out my internet connection in one way downloads with SSL encryption is great and don't need to jump through hoops with maintaining ratios or getting invites.
AMZN, SSL, PEGA, JBLU. I recently sold F. Also bought ME entirely on a belief that they will make a medical breakthrough but it’s not supported by fundamentals.
Their DDOS protection is the best in the market. Plus, they provide a batteries-included portal for web hosting. Cloudflare provides pretty much everything someone would need to host a website - domain registration, DDoS protection, S3-like data storage, CDN, image hosting, SSL, email, VPN and analytics. All of it from a single user-friendly portal. Individually, their service may not have a moat but collectivity, their suite of services is extremely powerful.
usu it's a short report which has even less merit. can't say that some of these LPs don't deserve these lawsuits with the way they've been blatantly mismanaged. if SSL can write a book about creating a Billion dollar startup, the guys from CGC can write one on how to blow 5B.
guys this is just a phishing website, jesus christ. it doesnt even have SSL and you all are debating how else you got scammed because you wanted to “get into crypto” oh my lord
Its hard not to be a dumpster fire when 33% of revenues went to excise taxes this quarter. I think they are okay now, didn't burn much cash from operations if you ignore the write downs. Hopeful whatever synergies they have with Tilray push them into the positives. No doubt, SSL / Montour's / AA / Vincent chiara should be in jail. Can't wait to see who the f200 partner is! /s
Hexo was and is dumpster fire. The only thing that I am glad they did was buying out Zenabis and bailing me out of my Zena investment. From that time onwards, I knew that they'll go on lose money and be bankrupt one day. I'm just surprised to see it happen so soon. Imo, I think SSL deliberately caused the company to go down this path while he walked away with a golden parachute. This is just another example of day light robbery of retail investors.
I think you'll have a fun time looking into Hexo/redecans history and all the fucked up stuff they did that ultimately led to Hexo's downfall. Adam arviv drama to kick SSL > Scott Cooper from Molson/truss beverages > hells angel > KAOS > fortune 200 Vincent Chiara bragged about prior to dilution (no partnership ever came through after boasting about it for 2 years) Adam Arviv and the Montours (they all joined the board from redecan) likely bigger crooks than the boys who bought LATAM. And now they involved with tilray/Surreya 😂 all were missing at this point is Vic.
I'm not sure what you're doing here but I use averages. In particular SSL (SSL Hybrid with all the noisy shit except the main trend line turned off, but I just grabbed the code for that section). For exits I also track RSI crossing its 50 SMA and SAR flipping to indicate a possible reversal. They're often too noisy to use for entries but if you have a strong move on something you're already in then they can provide an earlier warning than just waiting for the opposite entry signal. Basically if I'm in a play and it's doing well it will pull away from the averages. So if I get a signal from one of those 2 when not close to SSL I'll consider an exit or setting a stop loss. If it's a slow and steady it will stay nearer to SSL and I'll just ignore the other 2 and wait for SSL to cross instead. Or just keep a trailing stop loss at the SSL value. That said I use all of that as indications to get out earlier. If a play is doing well I'll just find whatever time frame is producing the easiest to read graphs and just stick stop losses at recent swing low and keep moving it up. For longs obviously. Anyway I'm done over sharing now. Though those signals look decent so I am curious what you're doing? Have you published it?
If you are doing tequila and salt short lime, or SSL as Rusty from Greek so eloquently defines, I recommend using see salt. The salt competent overpowers any tequila taste you bitch ass pussys caint handle.
* SSL error * newsletter popup * SSL error again * entire page is over half advertisements I hate mobile websites
You clearly forgot thic Vic, cam, SSL, Bruce, can trust, EMH, FSD, and almost every other LP CEO that ran their company to the ground. I've made it clear tilray is my biggest holding, until msos can uplist
My SSL shares are grateful to all of you for your sacrifice.
Look at SSL. It's a 2x in a year, 18 months imo
#Ban Bet Won --- /u/youvebeenjammed made a bet that SSL would go to 14.0 within **4 weeks** when it was 12.54 and it did, congrats you fuckin nerd. Their record is now 4 wins and 2 losses You're a part of the [WSB Discord server](http://discord.gg/Y6Zw9ZKYdx), therefore you earned 10,000 coins for your win!
I have my own web site, you can search in my update. However, I have been permanently blocked when I share (even for fun). The way you need to do is: 1. Take a nice domain (very important) appx cost $12/year 2. Take a VPS (I got it for $25/year, but you can get cheaper or free). I prefer my own control on VPS, paid $25/year 3. My preference is for LAMP OS, but you can choose Microsoft whatever you are comfortable. 4. I get mysql (maria db) free, with apache, php..etc (mandatory) 5. Get SSL certificate (for me $6/year) and link it with apache/https 6. Download wordpress (free) and install it All these can be done within a day (for me it is just 30-60 minutes work, being exp. programmer). Good Luck.
**Ban Bet Created:** **/u/youvebeenjammed** bet **SSL** goes from **12.54** to **14.0** before **17-Apr-2023 12:51 PM EDT** Their record is 3 wins and 2 losses.
The portal kind but it has to know to route internet traffic through the tunnel. Typically IPsec based tunnels can be configured that way. SSL tunnels usually only route a specific app
There are still decent oil plays out there. smaller caps with decent value and more upside than down. SSL a good example
Tradingview for charting and TA. My Stock Portfolio app for quickly checking my watchlist, alerts, news and stock data for basic fundamental analysis. If the stock is positive EPS I'll Google it's intrinsic value. I'll also Google it's real value and use the result from Microaxis. If the real value seems dubious especially compared to intrinsic value I'll also half it. For longs if it's below all three I'll consider it. I'll also check it's PE forward PE and PB first to see how I feel about it to then see if those results align with that. I'll then mark out the up to 3 valuations (intrinsic, real, 50% of real) with a horizontal line on tradingview. Indicators I use. RSI, SAR, MACD, 13 EMA, 48 EMA, 200 EMA, SSL hybrid. I don't care that much about the EMAs for entry if the stock is undervalued but seeing how they compare is useful to make sure you aren't chasing or catching a falling knife. Candle type Heikin Ashi. Timeframe daily except for choosing exit values. Getting in I'll just wait until the stock is trading more or less sideways a bit and phase in. Usually with one third of my maximum amount. If it goes against me I'll wait for it to calm down again then average down unless my conviction in the stock changes. A flip on the indicators to bullish with the SSL hybrid going red to green is also a buy signal as long as it's not too volatile. Then sit and wait. I swing trade. Once the move happens I'll find the time frame it's laddering up on the best (moving up, trading sideways, moving up). I set a stop loss at recent swing low to take profit. SSL makes it much easier to see and identify this. If it's near one of my value lines I may just set that for all my shares. If it isn't I'll set it for half my shares and just keep moving my stop loss up accordingly (or down if the trend continues down). If my stop loss is down it's for the other 50%. If it's up because it's bounced I'll set it for half of what I've got left. I'll just keep going until halfing seems pointless on the way up, I get to the value lines or I just get stopped out on the way down. Going slower and making sure I can average down just works better for me. If I try to day trade and/or use stop losses for risk management I always end up losing money in the long term. But I much prefer stop losses for taking profit so I don't sell big runners too early and miss out. And that was way longer than I expected it to be and I'm not even sure it's what you were asking but hey ho.
Hey /u/SSL-sneakers - I am a bot from /r/wallstreetbets. You submitted one or more banned tickers: TFSA. We don't allow discussion of low market cap (less than 500mm) tickers to prevent pump & dump spam and scammers.
The fucking domain and it’s SSL certificate you special needs kid?! Since when do we have to counter proof ridiculous assumptions?
TNGRF made most of the running there. Currently SSL largest position
TNGRF and SSL make up 90% of holdings
Buying SSL as we speak at a p/e of 4 with a 4% dividend yield
- Rob Mcpherson/linkedin “"Our laser focus on tackling the balance sheet, pulling back on those unprofitable products where our strengths in premium cultivation were not being leveraged and expanding further into opportunities where we know we can win, is paying off across the business." Wait...what? First of all, that's not laser focus, especially the expanding part. Second, their results, are, what's the word...freak'n awful. Sure, they are better than they have been, but that's like saying the Arizona Coyotes are doing better (and are laser focused on playing in a 5000 seat arena and getting Connor Bedard). Hexo is seeing continually declining revenue, no gross margin and still bloated operational expenses - they lose more money than the world's biggest couch cushion. SSL broke the back of this company and it's not coming back - they needed Irwin's ego to keep them afloat and they will need more help to stay alive - the long term play is to get acquired, because there is no way, in my opinion, and that of anyone with 3 brain cells, thinks that they can turn this thing into something that actually makes money. Just wait and watch - the Redee's pre-roll business will plateau - it's a joint, for gosh sakes - and the only reason it's profitable, I think, is that GRE likely gave them the capital assets to produce them. Do the math - look at their financials - think about the business and you will come to the same conclusion. And if you don't, kiss your money good-bye - it's falling into that couch. “
Imagine SSL comes back buys hexo with all his severance , pulls a wolf of Wall Street ,”I’m not fucking leaving “
Unfortunately, yes still in hexo. SSL destroyed this company. I bought because I was bullish on the drinks from truss, redecan, and the fortune 200 partnership they always spoke about. I'm not sure they can turn things around. Their recent report was grim at best and they only have a few quarters left of cash. The KAOS backstop is a complete mess, they need their share price at $0.30 to utilize it which I guess they can after they RS. But dilution at these levels will hurt the stock. At this point, I'm just waiting for tilray to take them over for pennies on the dollar. I've DCA'd alot into hexo and it's been a bottomless pit. I'd say don't do it but then again, your average is so high it wouldn't take much to drop it. Just be prepared for more dilution
-200 IQ play: Musk drop another batch of Twitter files. it look like Twitter employees is able to read your DM. bet on Certificate authority like GoDaddy? every one gonna demand encryption on everything. SSL MOON?
I am the customer. If the app I want doesn't exist in their store, I need to either give up the app or move to a platform that has the app I want. No different than exclusive titles on video game systems. Back to the shitty burger analogy. Burgerking doesn't sell Big Macs. But I fucking love Big Macs. I don't yell at Mcdonalds to let burger king sell Big Macs, I just go to McDonald's. But yes, it does suck for the developers, because short term they need to lose a massive customer base to make the leap. So is losing 30% of your revenue to apple better than losing 50% to only developing for Android? (Or whatever the demographic breakdown is for your app). That's the business decision apple is banking on. I'd wager most individual developers would lose the fight on their own, but with a growing number banding together, apple will likely cave. And again, the "don't let install from random places" is the security control, not the limit. I've said that twice now. They are making the default option to only allow installs from trusted locations, kind of like how browsers warn you of bad SSL certs. Or how corporate networks sometimes implement whitelists, etc. Can you change a setting and work around it? Yes. That's your choice. But the DEFAULT is to be more secure. The 3 app limit is dumb. Closed is the wrong word, "controlled" is more accurate. They do it with hardware as well. People bitches for decades about how often windows crashed - yeah, no shit, it's because it was trying to be compatible with an infinite set of hardware configs. Apple? Nope. Only supported in the very specific sets they allowed. Their phone is the same thing.
Literally buying SSL hand over fist. Reckon it could double in 2 years.
>I do not believe that the company is financially troubled. The timing of the SSL certificate may suggest that they will release Q4 2022 earnings on the same date as it expires, but I do not think this necessarily means that their earnings will be bad. If anything, it suggests to me that they are confident in their ability to meet or exceed expectations.
Apart from Soros, Fidelity and Vanguard have huge stakes. MSFT offered 55bn few years back for CRM, last November market cap was 200 bn +. 96% of the revenue is from repeat customers since it is subscription based. And people say the software is bad. I would say it too and never do CRM but they have the best tech brains in the industry. Guy who developed SSL, paxos or raft, top guys on database, Apache pheonix was developed in-house. PMC of Hadoop, Hbase all work there. There are lot of good companies you can invest in and CRM is one of those IMHO.
Who? SSL? He was flushed out over a year ago. https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2021/10/18/2315521/0/en/HEXO-Announces-Strategic-Executive-Changes.html
> Quantum computing will be able to simply solve those problems sometime in the next 6-7 years Ethereum (and most blockchains) all use very standard cryptographic primitives. SHA2 / SHA3 for hashing, ECC (elliptic curve cryptography) for asymetric encryption. Know what else uses those primitives? ***EVERYTHING.*** SSH tunnels, VPN traffic, HTTP over TLS/SSL, version control software, x509 certificates, pretty much all government communications, you name it. If a quantum computer rolls out that can crack those primitives, Ethereum failing will be one tiny ember on the burning log that is the finance industry, all within a huge raging forest fire that is pretty much all of the public internet. Even if SHA3 or ECC is cracked, and crypto is 10x it's current size, I think there will still be much more viable targets. Because the last thing you'll want to do is something that makes people aware you can break those algorithms. Regardless, Ethereum has already thought of this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDxpGMGSGDE > Crypto has uses but it cannot be a replacement for government backed currencies. That's just one [potential] use case among 100s (1000s even). Ethereum has DeFi, DAOs, NFTs, etc... > We can keep muddling along with the current mostly safe algorithms for fast transactions but crypto is not a currency. It is a con game covered in a techno babble bubble. that statement literally means nothing. > The way cons work best is to get the sucker emotionally attached to the con so they can’t think clearly about what they are buying. Anytime someone tells you to trust the magic box that you don’t understand they are running a con. See Bernie Madoff for details on how to start your own successful con. That doesn't explain one single aspect of how you think crypto (Ethereum being one of the leading ones) is a con. You literally haven't explained a single reason to back up your "con" claim. Good try though. Thanks for playing.
Maersk and other SSL companies will just invent new fees to make up for lowered seafreight costs. My favorite right now is OOCL with arbitrary fees they don't even bother trying to hide.
I think that's a personal thing honestly, depending on what you like to see in the markets. A scalper might find a lot of value in something like the KDJ or Relative Vigor Index but a trend trader is going to get chopped to shit using these because they will be getting countertrend buy/sell signals every few days. For what its worth, my sweetspot is daytrading and short term swing trading (10 days or less). I will share my setup that I have across 4 screens. This will be long, sorry. All my charts have full extended hours to show the full amount of data so I don't have any gaps or false moves on the indicators that are stronger than normal. The first screen is the daily chart that has a 5, 21, 63, 126, and 252 day Volume Weighted Moving Average set to calculate on the HLC3 formula. In this setup, it gives me a sort of rolling VWAP of the weekly, monthly, quarterly, bi-annual, and yearly participants. I have a 5-day Rate of Change plotted for both the ticker and SPY so I can see if the ticker is moving more or less than SPY as I only daytrade relative strength or weakness setups. I have the Trader's Dynamic Index (TDI) for momentum where I want the fast and slow period MA over the Baseline for longs and vice-versa short on standard settings and the Elder's Force Index on standard settings where I want it >0 for longs and <0 for shorts. I also have the AlphaTrends Anchored VWAP for the week-to-date, month-to-date, quarter-to-date, and year-to-date on there but I only apply those as a last check to make sure I am not buying or selling something right against one of those as price has a habit of rejecting those levels. On the 1hr chart I have a 16 period Rate of Change (1 true trading day) for the ticker and for SPY. The Force Index is also applied on standard settings and needs match the daily. I look for the TDI Baseline to be > or < 50 depending on which setup I want to trade based on my daily chart bias. On the 15minute chart I have a 2-day AlphaTrends Anchored VWAP anchored to yesterday's 4am open, where a bullish scenario would be price > yesterday's VWAP and vice-versa for bearish and the Time Weighted Average Price, a little known indicator that institutions use to gauge how to get the best fills both for today and yesterday. Yesterday's is handy, like the 2-day A-VWAP as price over yesterday = bullish, below = bearish. Lastly, I have the 5min chart for my execution screen where I have a 12-period ROC for the ticker + SPY (1 true hour of data), the TDI, the EFI, intraday VWAP, and something called an SSL Channel. An SSL Channel is simply a moving average of the highs and lows over a given period. I use a 12-period again here for the channel for 1 true hour of data. I am looking here for the 5min EFI and TDI to match the daily + hourly and for the ROC of the ticker to be outpacing SPY on the daily, hourly and 5min to give a true sense of the strength/weakness of the stock. It seems like a lot, but I have a custom scanner setup to narrow down the daily + hourly setups, and even without it, I can check all of these parameters in about a minute, which is 5x less than my execution window (the 5min chart). I am rarely left feeling like I missed a move. Of course, nothing is a sure thing, but I have done well this month, ~40% account growth in 3.5 weeks. Will that continue, who knows, but it works for me because I sat down and tested each and every one of these extensively and didn't trade a thing for almost 18 months after I almost blew up my account and I said never again. I have a setup for short term swing trades for credit spreads as well but I feel like this is already way too long. If anyone is interested, I will happily post that as it requires a different window setup and indicator setup, but only uses 1 chart, the daily.
SSL/TLS is end to end and not going to see the traffic.
With SSL (now TLS), you can still see what IP address the request is coming from, intermediary actors just can not see the contents of the traffic unless you’re on server. That’s what VPNs are for. Don’t get me started on the new AI fingerprinting technology.
As long as you use SSL there is no possible way for Google to see your traffic.
For those that don't have Tradingview and running SSL Hybrid, QQE Mod, and 200 EMA, it just hit a buy :)
If you're considering trading the volatility of your stocks that essentially means you're considering trading with TA instead of the current fundamentals you mentioned. You need some metric to decide price trend changes, the how you decide when to sell part. If you're comfortable doing that when it sounds like you're pretty good at fundamentals that's up to you. But if it means learning a new skill I don't know if I would in your position. It's took me a couple of years to get good at it and I'm only now getting consistent. To actually answer your question I use SSL hybrid to indicate trend direction. But I'd er on the side of telling you not to and to ask yourself if you're comfortable timing a sell wrong and watching it rip up another 20% when you don't own it in order to avoid it potentially going down. That said you can't go broke taking profits.
SSL made out like a bandit with that golden parachute. Worst CEO of any cannabis company out there, maybe tied with the ACB fella.
https://www.tradingview.com/script/C3MlAWCw-SSL-Hybrid/ It makes current trends easy to see as well as when they're broke. Just makes the chart way easier to read in my opinion.
I already have some of my old scripts on PSAR and RSI. So it won't take much time. But what's an SSL?
No worries. Being just SAR and RSI it's very easy to code up in a pine script strategy so you can review it. Equity curve is pretty sweet. I'm currently working on adding SSL to it to filter out some false signals too. Who knows maybe I'll publish it. Hope it works well for you.
If you saw my tradingview you'd probably think a child had scribbled on my screen lol. #Basic: RSI but change the MA to 50. Typically people use RSI above 50 is bullish below is bearish. But I find below MA bearish above MA bullish more accurate and quicker (less lagging). Parabolic SAR. I don't care about the number just if it's bullish (below candles) or bearish (above candles). My main entry is the SAR changing from one to the other and confirmed by the RSI. E.g. SAR flips bullish and RSI is above the MA is a long signal. Visa versa shorts. #More: Volatility Oscillator. This changes candles colours to show how volatile the price action is. Makes it incredibly easy to see strong moves. SSL. A form of moving average that's also coloured but follows chart shapes more closely. Makes it incredibly easy to see short term trends and breakouts. There's loads though. For example instead of volatility there's heatmap volume. And the list goes on. I follow Trade IQ on the tube to discover and learn tradingview indicators. He actually back tests them rather than claiming "omg 100% succes you be millionaire in a week's!". If you're ok with coding you may want to look at pine script too. Not to the level you're writing stuff from scratch but you're limited to 3 indicators unless you're paying. If you want something incredibly basic like SAR but want more than 3 indicators once you understand pine script enough it's trivial to copy and paste code to say add SAR to SSL in your own custom indicator and thus bipass the 3 indicator limit. But whatever you research test it for yourself. Everyone's trading styles are different. What works for me may suck for you.
Basically gives you the ability to leverage yourself with exposure to a single stock. So say you want to buy TSLA, and you know its going to go to the moon, so you want to buy EVEN MORE than you can afford (e.g. would need to take a loan to buy, aka. leverage yourself). Well, lo and behold, now you can buy this single-stock leveraged ETF and pretend like you did just that! Now if TSLA goes up, your SSL ETF goes up even more!!
or Bruce played them like a fiddle Looking at all Canadian LPs their CEOs got a fat ass package SSL from hexo is a god damn shithole CEO and got a golden parachute before he was kicked out Canadian Cannabis companies are shiet, maybe Tilray is putting the pieces together for long term domination, and CGC has the STZ backing, but everyone else is peanuts.