Reddit Posts
EGSwap Revolutionizes Decentralized Exchanges
CCIP-075 - Adjust front page topic limit to be in accordance with sub activity [NO MOONS]
Understanding Crypto Jargon : A Guide for Everyone
Mentions
I see where you are coming from. To have a good understanding of any subjects, we need to understand the basics or the fundamentals. Then we used that information as reference to understand more complex ideas. In the context of cryptocurrencies & blockchain technology, a "hash" refers to a fixed-size output generated by a cryptographic hash function. A hash function is a mathematical algorithm that takes an input (data of any size) & produces a fixed-size output, known as a hash value or digest. Hashing plays a crucial role in the security & integrity of blockchain networks. EG, in the context of Bitcoin mining, miners use hash functions (such as SHA-256) to hash transaction data & create a new block in the blockchain. This process involves solving complex mathematical puzzles to find a hash value that meets certain criteria, known as the "proof of work." Hash functions have several key properties that make them important in cryptography & blockchain technology, including: 1. Deterministic: Given the same input, a hash function will always produce the same output. 2. Quick to compute: Hash functions can generate hash values quickly, making them suitable for use in blockchain networks. 3. Collision-resistant: It is computationally infeasible to find two different inputs that produce the same hash value. 4. Irreversible: It should be nearly impossible to reverse-engineer the original input data from the hash value. In summary, hashes play a critical role in ensuring data integrity, security, and consensus in cryptocurrency systems by providing a unique and tamper-proof representation of transaction data and other information on the blockchain. Blockchain is a hype up word which is just based on hash. As you can see, this has limitations because it is not reversible or scalable so it will struggle to transact as fast as VISA. When it's not reversible, you can't do a refund.
Welcome to the majestic realm of Big Brown Duck $BBD, the latest sensation to grace the Blockchain Galaxy! 🦆✨ Want a fair opportunity at getting a great position in a token that has huge potential? Big Brown Duck is for you! $BBD 🦆 Low MC of under 1 Mil 🦆 Liquidity is Locked 🦆 Rapidly growing community! Huge potential to develop! Don’t miss the chance to buy $BBD! Everything you need is located on the website, consider it a hub for interacting with Big Brown Duck ✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅ Chart: https://dexscreener.com/solana/cf9d1eitmch8qjnovzfjfldd7yq3hnp2ej9wkttaasnx Twitter: https://twitter.com/BigBrownDuckBBD Telegram: https://t.me/BigBrownDuck Website: https://bigbrownduck.com CA: EG68sLFdbmCmiePDyKAxkEgfUaeXsmawXnWRvejd8H3K
Never said I continue to visit the site in any post I followed the link one time observed a couple things EG the active group chat going on on the site but that's it One visit again never said I continue to visit the site . Not understanding how you're just adding things to what I supposedly said
Never said I continue to visit the site in any post I followed the link one time observed a couple things EG the active group chat going on on the site but that's it One visit again never said I continue to visit the site . Not understanding how you're just adding things to what I supposedly said
No, they are still doing work with the EG coin. And the team vested themselves early. They've even made a decent looking exchange called EGswap.
EG, the crypto for charity. Been around since the last bullrun.
Buy a memecoin that is substantially below its all time high, that has name recognition, and a solid team of people developing the ecosystem. Personally Im in to Hoge and Elongate (EG Token) for these reasons.
I feel the same about Elongate. It updated its contract and rebeanded as EG Token. Currently 200x from all time high. Look up EGSwap and EGSpectre. Theyve been building. Also doing a massive burn soon on their burn party platform. Worth checking out their socials and seeing what you think!
All ETFs I buy constantly rebalance. Investors purchase them for a certain allocation - and those allocations are specifically listed as percentages in the prospectus. EG. 5% Nvidia, 5% Microsoft, etc. At least all the ones I've bought - I have never bought Blackrock ETFs, so perhaps they work differently?
>EG I stopped mining BTC in 2011 over an excessive power bill. Should have just had less takeouts. Oh I tried the we need to buy stuff with BTC at every opportunity for the sake of adoption. Never really recovered that opportunity. > >ETH mining etc later but I missed the best times to mine and hold at the individual level of resources in, long term benefits out. Missed mining opportunities?)
EG I stopped mining in 2011 over an excessive power bill. Should have just had less takeouts. Never really recovered that opportunity.
[https://taurexbullrun.com/?rdt_cid=4316952079315832347&utm_campaign=bull&utm_medium=paidsocial&utm_source=reddithttp://paypal.me/MHAMAD1900?country.x=SA&locale.x=ar_EG](https://taurexbullrun.com/?rdt_cid=4316952079315832347&utm_campaign=bull&utm_medium=paidsocial&utm_source=reddit)
a7mad.joojoo@gma7mad.joojoo@gmail.comail.comDashboard Signupwww..googol.comhttps://zerohash.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/360021350753-What-is-Zero-Hash-Settlement-Service-https://paypal.me/MHAMAD1900?country.x=SA&locale.x=ar_EG
I'm... not sure I'd classify that as "an intimidation campaign". It's a political mailer. It's crude and the wording is questionable, but there's no threat beyond "we're gonna keep sending mailers to people who give this guy political donations" which is... not a threat, it's just informational with some rather blunt wording. EG: We're not going to keep spamming you with these. TBH feels like Tuman was playing it up for attention. Like OMG people are harassing my supporters! Mailing political messages isn't harassment unless they contain harassing, threatening, or inappropriate materials or an excessive number of them are sent.
That's not intellectually honest. EG if you wanted 10000 moons to run a contest you couldn't just get them free.
Not worthless to someone who hates bitcoin and wants to see it fail. . . EG another blockchain or new emerging tech.
I'm reading too much news about EG.5 (Eris) variant recently.
All great but that thing with the Epic Games is what I don't like. As everything that comes from PRC, we need to be careful. The Epic Games Store has very aggressive, anti-consumer business practices, and there was proof that they are harvesting data. The only thing that is protected is personal data, everything else is on their plate to take. ​ People can do what they want, but I will never install EG, I am sticking to the steam when it comes to gaming.
[about this much i think](https://youtube.com/shorts/zjxQWu2EG9g?si=isE4IHiSqPq2M-Os)
This looks like a governance poll and has been filtered for mod review prior to voting. /u/CryptoMaximalist or /u/ominous_anenome or another mod will give it a final review and let you know when it is approved or what needs to be adjusted. If everything is in order, approve the post, remove this comment. Otherwise OP should repost to correct the issue. Please verify these things * This is listed as an approved CCIP here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LhhqB4UAezNMdAwjV3evFXPD2x1JFCFHdnm8rmyRqAE/edit?usp=sharing * This has the proper CCIP-### - prefix * The poll does not include misinformation and the solution is clear and unambiguous * The poll is a governance poll (There will be a pie chart in the top right) If there is no poll at all, it may be a temp reddit glitch and work from a different platform * The poll only has 2 options, the first is supportive and second is No Change * The poll is posted on Wednesday of Moon Week (The day of the snapshot) * The poll is set to run for 7 days * The poll has [NoMoons] at the end of the title The original text of this poll is archived below: Title: CCIP-075 - Adjust front page topic limit to be in accordance with sub activity [NO MOONS] Body: # Problem: [CCIP-012](https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/oy7mva/algorithmic_limit_for_number_of_coin_posts/) is a huge positive for the sub in that, **topic limits help to keep a single trending topics/asset from overwhelming the content found on the sub**. However as the overall activity fluctuates in the sub the topic limit can have unintended secondary consequences. New low quality posts, and old posts can get stuck in the top 50 for significantly longer simply because there are not enough total posts to cycle them out. * During the 2021 Bullrun, new posts would start in the 70s and have to be upvoted to make top 50 to then take up a topic space. * As it currently stands new posts regularly start between 40-50. This means: 1. Any post regardless of quality can take a spot in the top 50 and lock up that category due to topic limits 2. Really hot posts can get stuck inside the top 50 for multiple days. **Although both of these issues are not critical**, they can create an instance where users are unable to contribute to specific topics for longer periods of times, simply because old and unpopular posts do not cycle out of the top 50 as quickly as they did when this sub was more active. # Solution Create a system where we attempt to correlate total subreddit activity to the topic ceiling, so when the sub is less active the topic threshold drops from being based off the top 50 to top 35. This will be done by using the Bitcoin price from ATH as a reference point for the topic ceiling limit. * If the price of Bitcoin falls below 40% of the ATH - (currently $27.6K) - the topic limit will consider the top 35 posts. * If the price of Bitcoin goes above 70% of the ATH - (currently $48.3K) - the topic limit will consider the 50 posts. * Anything between 40%-70% will be based off the last triggered threshold. EG. If BTC goes from 35% to 50% the limit will be based off of the top 35. If it goes from 75% to 50% it will be based off the top 50. **This solution assumes the activity of the sub correlates largely with the price of Bitcoin, and if the price of Bitcoin goes up activity will increase and if it goes down activity will decrease. This aims to create a more dynamic approach to the topic limit where total activity is considered to determine how many total posts should be considered when determining topic limits.** # Pros * Old and unpopular posts don't take up a spot in the coin limit for as long. * Gives all users more freedom in creating posts more frequently as coin limit topics will cycle faster. * Easy to implement/maintain # Cons * Bitcoin price is not a true determinate of Sub Activity, this metric assumes sub activity will increase as Bitcoin gets closer to an ATH, and decrease as BTC drops from its ATH. * Underlying changes to sub activity do occur separate from the price of Bitcoin (e.g. Moons increasing in popularity) * Popular/Trending topics in the sub will be able to have more posts made about them slightly more frequently. * If topics start outside of top 50 or top 35, users may once again experience posts that have been up for awhile but get removed because a different post triggers the topic limit and removes all limit related posts below it (this was a bull market problem, where users might get a post removed a few hours after it was posted due to a different post triggering the topic limits.) # Final Notes: Addressing this issue in my opinion is a slight quality of life benefit for sub users. Additionally limiting the top 35 posts instead of top 50 still filters nearly the first 1.5 pages of the sub to limit hot and trendy topics from overwhelming the sub. **Although I do not anticipate any problems as a result of this CCIP - If this change creates unintended long term consequences later on - future CCIPS can always be created to repeal or modify this CCIP. Any potential future changes could begin by looking at:** * Finding a way to calculate limit ceiling by looking at total approved posts. * Finding a way to calculate limit ceiling by using Unique Sub Views. * Removing Posts from counting towards the topic limit after X number of hours. \-Poll by u/GabeSter *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoCurrency) if you have any questions or concerns.*
This looks like a governance poll and has been filtered for mod review prior to voting. /u/CryptoMaximalist or /u/ominous_anenome or another mod will give it a final review and let you know when it is approved or what needs to be adjusted. If everything is in order, approve the post, remove this comment. Otherwise OP should repost to correct the issue. Please verify these things * This is listed as an approved CCIP here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LhhqB4UAezNMdAwjV3evFXPD2x1JFCFHdnm8rmyRqAE/edit?usp=sharing * This has the proper CCIP-### - prefix * The poll does not include misinformation and the solution is clear and unambiguous * The poll is a governance poll (There will be a pie chart in the top right) If there is no poll at all, it may be a temp reddit glitch and work from a different platform * The poll only has 2 options, the first is supportive and second is No Change * The poll is posted on Wednesday of Moon Week (The day of the snapshot) * The poll is set to run for 7 days * The poll has [NoMoons] at the end of the title The original text of this poll is archived below: Title: CCIP-075 - Adjust front page topic limit to be in accordance with sub activity [NoMoons] Body: # Problem: [CCIP-012](https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/oy7mva/algorithmic_limit_for_number_of_coin_posts/) is a huge positive for the sub in that, **topic limits help to keep a single trending topics/asset from overwhelming the content found on the sub**. However as the overall activity fluctuates in the sub the topic limit can have unintended secondary consequences. New low quality posts, and old posts can get stuck in the top 50 for significantly longer simply because there are not enough total posts to cycle them out. * During the 2021 Bullrun, new posts would start in the 70s and have to be upvoted to make top 50 to then take up a topic space. * As it currently stands new posts regularly start between 40-50. This means: 1. Any post regardless of quality can take a spot in the top 50 and lock up that category due to topic limits 2. Really hot posts can get stuck inside the top 50 for multiple days. **Although both of these issues are not critical**, they can create an instance where users are unable to contribute to specific topics for longer periods of times, simply because old and unpopular posts do not cycle out of the top 50 as quickly as they did when this sub was more active. # Solution Create a system where we attempt to correlate total subreddit activity to the topic ceiling, so when the sub is less active the topic threshold drops from being based off the top 50 to top 35. This will be done by using the Bitcoin price from ATH as a reference point for the topic ceiling limit. * If the price of Bitcoin falls below 40% of the ATH - (currently $27.6K) - the topic limit will consider the top 35 posts. * If the price of Bitcoin goes above 70% of the ATH - (currently $48.3K) - the topic limit will consider the 50 posts. * Anything between 40%-70% will be based off the last triggered threshold. EG. If BTC goes from 35% to 50% the limit will be based off of the top 35. If it goes from 75% to 50% it will be based off the top 50. **This solution assumes the activity of the sub correlates largely with the price of Bitcoin, and if the price of Bitcoin goes up activity will increase and if it goes down activity will decrease. This aims to create a more dynamic approach to the topic limit where total activity is considered to determine how many total posts should be considered when determining topic limits.** # Pros * Old and unpopular posts don't take up a spot in the coin limit for as long. * Gives all users more freedom in creating posts more frequently as coin limit topics will cycle faster. * Easy to implement/maintain # Cons * Bitcoin price is not a true determinate of Sub Activity, this metric assumes sub activity will increase as Bitcoin gets closer to an ATH, and decrease as BTC drops from its ATH. * Underlying changes to sub activity do occur separate from the price of Bitcoin (e.g. Moons increasing in popularity) * Popular/Trending topics in the sub will be able to have more posts made about them slightly more frequently. * If topics start outside of top 50 or top 35, users may once again experience posts that have been up for awhile but get removed because a different post triggers the topic limit and removes all limit related posts below it (this was a bull market problem, where users might get a post removed a few hours after it was posted due to a different post triggering the topic limits.) # Final Notes: Addressing this issue in my opinion is a slight quality of life benefit for sub users. Additionally limiting the top 35 posts instead of top 50 still filters nearly the first 1.5 pages of the sub to limit hot and trendy topics from overwhelming the sub. **Although I do not anticipate any problems as a result of this CCIP - If this change creates unintended long term consequences later on - future CCIPS can always be created to repeal or modify this CCIP. Any potential future changes could begin by looking at:** * Finding a way to calculate limit ceiling by looking at total approved posts. * Finding a way to calculate limit ceiling by using Unique Sub Views. * Removing Posts from counting towards the topic limit after X number of hours. \-Poll by u/GabeSter *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoCurrency) if you have any questions or concerns.*
\*maxx3141 the goat💯 
Bridging i guess, it is a pain to get your crypto where you want it. EG getting eth to arb nova
VET being listed at CB? Reminds me this movie [scene](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g42EG7LD1UY). Better late then never.
Consistent purchase of crypto, at a regular interval, regardless of price. EG. Buying $100 of BTC, every Friday regardless of the price.
>\- You can choose when to DCA out > >\- You can choose when to DCA in These deserved one line and yes when you DCA in/out you do it manually I address that in my post. ​ >\- You are able to capitalize full from large price movements (something that is dampened when in a liquidity pool) This is trading not DCAing in/out ​ >\- You asset is not affected by the preformace of the other. EG: Normal moons would NOT be affected by price movements of ETH if you were HODLing, but would be affected if you were providig liquidity. This is a fair point when referring to a moon/eth pool but is not fair if we're referring to a Moon/USDC pool. ​ >\- The number of tokens you own does not randomly change with DCA, (you are in control), whereas in a liquidity pool its based on the pool ration It's not **randomly changing** it's changing as people trade in the pool in real time. Your interval DCA in/out will cause you to have more/less of the asset over a period of time, again this more goes to your first point of you control the DCA in/out.
I'm sorry but this is a load of BS. DCA (in and out) is VERY different from impermanent loss. A few differences: \- You can choose when to DCA out \- You can choose when to DCA in \- You are able to capitalize full from large price movements (something that is dampened when in a liquidity pool) \- You asset is not affected by the preformace of the other. EG: Normal moons would NOT be affected by price movements of ETH if you were HODLing, but would be affected if you were providig liquidity. \- The number of tokens you own does not randomly change with DCA, (you are in control), whereas in a liquidity pool its based on the pool ration ​ ​ If you would like some decent sources, [here](https://academy.binance.com/en/articles/impermanent-loss-explained) is a good article by Binance Academy explaining impermanent loss . And [here](https://academy.binance.com/en/articles/dollar-cost-averaging-dca-explained) is another good article explaing the bascis behind DCA
I think there needs to be a limiter. I'm all for bought moons providing voting weight - and have brought it up before; but I think the following 2 rules should also apply. Bought moons have a 50% voting weight. Bought moons threshold is 50% of your total earned moons. EG. I have earned 100 moons. I have bought 5000 moons. 50% of 100 = 50 50% of 50 = 25 In this scenario, my voting weight = 125. This allows for people to 'buy some power' but only within limits of their contribution, thus preventing 'hostile takeovers' - but also allowing newer contributors more weight.
The penalty is: for 1 comment over 50 you are penalised 1 karma, this steps up by 1 for every 5th comment, EG 56th comment you lose 2 karma, 61st you lose 3 karma, etc etc
ahahaha none of those mate. my country has 500% import tax on vehicles so I'm looking at smt like an EG Hatch hopefully lol. maybe build that when i get the funds.
Unfortunately there's been crypto site hacks that have collected account info like email addresses that could identify targets. EG [Coinmarketcap](https://www.idstrong.com/data-breaches/coinmarketcap-data-breach/)
Oh. You're literally shilling your own doodoo. 
> The difference with web3/NFT games will be you can actually sell into a currency and not just steam credits essentially. (Yes I know other sites existed but for the majority of kids they just sold on steam for steam credits). > > This will pave the way for the so called ‘metaverse’ where communities are somewhat connected through the potential for cross game compatibility with your skins. > > **Imagine** buying a Ferrari and now you can bring it across to GTA, racing games, hell maybe fortnite! Ahh, the ol' reliable- IMAGINE!! WEB3. There's currently no reason to implement this. Rockstar will gladly sell you shark cards, and sell you a digital ferrari in GTA V, but nor them, or Epic games is interested in allowing you to resell or use that in Fortnite. EG will want you to purchase it again. And Rockstar is not interested in giving you a cut. They don't need your "digital" ferrari, to sell to others, they can just infinitely copy and paste more ferraris and sell them for full price. They have no incentivize to cannibalise on their own profits doing this. There is currently no reason, other than gimmicks, to do anything of the sort. All P2E games are also pretty much garbage at this point. The big dogs that currently run the industry have an opposite interest in this deal, they want things to remain as is, where they rake in all the cash.
Couple of points here... First, they're saying it *may* bring down fees, but until the change goes live it won't be clear what if any effect it has on those fees. Second, the price to validate an Eth transaction is still going to be a couple orders of magnitude higher than that to validate a traditional credit card or bank transaction. Third, the big thing here that the article goes into, but no one in the comments seems to be catching, is that this means there's going to be data on Ethereum that's transient. EG, it's not permanent. This is *huge* for both Ethereum's future direction *and* for crypto regulation in general, since it's likely going to be pointed to to show that removing data from the chain is *possible* with the right code changes... which has always been true, but this is going to be a proof of concept. It also, more generally, moves Eth and Blockchain in general closer to just being a weirdly public database... which raises even more questions about what the actual value add is.
To an extent, this is my first full cycle on things other then Bitcoin. I’ve minimised my holdings to what BTC, ETH and other healthy projects. I’ve DCA’d into those projects but I’ve limited myself and not gone silly. I’ve tried to diversify my hold of those coins, EG 60% of my portfolio is one coin. I’m trying even that out. I’m still checking the price everyday. I’ve also taken more ownership and got a cold store wallet where I hold the majority of my holdings.
> 1 Wei is 10^-18 Ethereum No. Ethereum is not a currency; it's the name of the network. Ether is the name of the currency that on the network. Therefore, 1 wei is equal to 10^(-18) **ether**. **Sources**: [CME Group](https://www.cmegroup.com/education/courses/introduction-to-ether/defining-ether-and-ethereum.html) > MOON - Something said to imply a token/coin rising in price quickly. Expecting high returns. Also r/CryptoCurrency's native token Also, MOON is not r/CryptoCurrency's native token. First of all, r/CryptoCurrency isn't a network on the blockchain. It's just a subreddit. > - Gas - The fees that you need to pay to make a transaction on the blockchain. Each blockchain will have different gas fees. GAs is paid in the blockchain's native token. EG: BTC got Bitcoin, ETH for Ethereum, BNB for BSC, etc etc As you correctly pointed out, gas is paid for in that network's native token. Since MOONs aren't being used to pay gas fees (incentive miners to add blocks to the blockchain), it's not a native token. **Definition:** [Investopedia](https://www.investopedia.com/what-are-native-tokens-6754173).
I guess the ony utility they'd provide in this situation is to change such items from being a closed-community offering, to one you can use in a variety of communities. EG, a 3D player avatar that you can use in different games, considering so many games use either Unreal or Unity.
The WWE and Endeavor Grp are merging. EG is the parent company who is the actual buyer at 51%
Greetings EG4N992. Your comment contained a referral link which directed to koinly.io/?via=. This is in violation of Rule II - No Spam. As a consequence, you will be banned from r/CryptoCurrency. *** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoCurrency) if you have any questions or concerns.*