IR

PapaCharlie9

You should always write LEAPS. LEAPS is an acronym like IRS. You don't have one IR agent, two IRS agents. It's always IRS and it is always LEAPS. Also LEAPS can be puts or calls, so you should specify. "I buy 1 ATM LEAPS call."

NiceRoyal9102

I’m so regarded for trusting that earnings picture on this instead of just checking IR site

Noafrojo

I have friends who work in IR (international relations) I read them takes on WSBs when geopolitical events occur it’s free comedy

NewAtmosphere2443

There isn't only one answer in IR.

faggie_dees

MRVL: The IR guy should be fired. They comingled the DSP numbers, non AI customer ASIC, compute ASICs, everything into AI that expectations went as high as $3B and now we are disappointed vs. the expectations. Why we are down. Hope helps your decision. Good luck.

MatrixOrigin

>We are probably #1 in Germany Wait a sec, they seemed damn confident they were #1 in that press release. Maybe the Curaleaf IR tweet questioning their claim had him hesitant on camera 😂😂

WorgenFreeman559

Nothing different. Buy dips on AMZN and META and chill, they’re leaders for a reason. Feeling stupid? Buy some OPRA, FOUR, GIL. AI utilities set won’t hurt either: IR, JELD, WMS, MPWR, PWR

Foe117

So can two cameras working together, even multiple overlapping cameras to see depth, Teslas disadvantage here is that there are depth blindspots outside the triple forward cameras, The rearward and forward side cameras are heavily disadvantaged. There is a cost inefficiency however, a high fidelity Lidar sensor is needed for the level that Waymo is using it. About 25k-40k if you want Waymo mechanical spinning lidar unit, then there's hybrid solid state lidar, which is a sensor on a galvanometer scan which can range from a field of view like a cone with long range, about 1.5k per unit, but highly impractical given how it operates, it uses a small sensor to scan an area, and best used for scanning buildings, then there's solid state which is the holy Grail, instantaneous speed and no need to compute a merged camera image, the cost of that still exceeds 4-8k per unit, and you'd need at least 2 per vehicle. Until price goes down a significant amount, it would be unwise to commit something where camera tech can equally improve, like low light performance and IR projection for low visibility.

10lionstribe

So, this is what I got: First I contacted the IR guy at the company. He answered quickly and referred me to my broker (in my case Interactive brokers). So, I contacted them and they said as following: https://preview.redd.it/wh0w2l910asc1.png?width=2376&format=png&auto=webp&s=2804dda1498e7e5142004a1312d390db914de556 So, I went and downloaded the doc from OCC and that is (next post)…

MaximusBit21

Does anyone know when the next monthly metrics come out? (As in roughly what date and is it published via their IR page)??

Many_Easy

Assuming their IR gets back to you. I’ve contacted them before and did not receive a response.

SmokedduetoTLRY

Just email IR (TLRY) and solve it.

acardboardpenguin

You know the ER Analyst in this post (Dan Ives) got charged by the SEC for improper accounting in a previous IR role right? It’s always weird when people not in the industry fall for marketing attempts by bucket shops.

PapaCharlie9

I've been fighting this "leap" and "LEAPs" battle for years, but only recently came up with the IRS (not IR, not IRs) bit.

randyranderson-

Oh that was a typo. I meant to write IR going up not down. Woops.

randyranderson-

That’s what I’m not sure I’m understanding practical terms. IR going down should also leads to slower earnings growth and stock price slumps. Considering how high rates were hiked, there should have been a more considerable drop in stock prices. But the PE ratio for the S&P500 is indicating that prices are at a stable point. Perhaps there’s just other confounding factors that explains this?

randyranderson-

That’s what I’m not sure I’m understanding practical terms. IR going down should also leads to slower earnings growth and stock price slumps. Considering how high rates were hiked, there should have been a more considerable drop in stock prices. But the PE ratio for the S&P500 is indicating that prices are at a stable point. Perhaps there’s just other confounding factors that explains this?

locked_in_the_middle

😂 at IR vs IRS analogy. Great analogy, but Something tells me you have first hand experience there. Good problem to have!

Visible_Sentence_399

What’s IR?

jeopardy_loser

nah stuck at home on IR 

theduderino38

A LOT Acreage Holdings Wana brands Jetty Several other smaller ones on their IR pages https://www.cnbc.com/2022/10/25/canopy-to-speed-entry-into-us-cannabis-market-with-new-holding-company.html

SPAC_Time

Supposed to be GTIWW on OTC Pink on March 15, but didn't happen. "[Graphjet’s warrants will be delisted from Nasdaq](https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2024/03/14/2846566/0/en/Graphjet-Technology-The-World-s-Only-Direct-Biomass-to-Graphite-Producer-Completes-Transaction-and-Will-Begin-Trading-on-Nasdaq.html#:~:text=Graphjet%E2%80%99s%20warrants%20will%20be%20delisted%20from%20Nasdaq) and begin trading on the OTC market under the symbol “GTIWW” on March 15, 2024. " Investor relations isn't answering shareholder emails about it. IFINW is still a SPAC, and they appear to still be trying to close the Seamless Group deal, so *perhaps* those will be relisted if/when that business combination closes. However, their IR contact refuses to respond to emails as well. CAUD / CAUDW was ASPA / ASPAW, completed business combination four months ago, they likewise haven't listed the CAUDW warrants, CEO told a shareholder he's given the assignment of CAUDW to other employees handling 'past issues'. Not an encouraging trend.

RoughOptions

You were trading tail risk and got burned. You were using sub par models and it failed. There's a market for tail risk too. Unfortunately you were, likely, the least influential, and least equipped, component in that market. What's more, the market was larger than just that option chain, but the OTC and all other flows, including FX and IR. Structure is more important than being right about one variable.

Making_Money_Now_1

Common Cents Investing video, again..seriously. The guy barely did any diligence on the Company and came out with one of the weakest arguments to be seen for anyone that has done the work. **Following, I will tackle some of his misunderstandings/misconceptions:** * **Let's consider the concept of 'priced for perfection.’ In the realm of deep-dive due diligence, it becomes evident that several public companies are in the same space as Aduro. For instance, there's PureCycle, a mechanical recycling company with significant limitations and a lack of IP, yet it is valued at an impressive enterprise value of 1.4 billion USD despite being pre-revenue. Then there's Agylix, with a Pyrolysis technology, valued at 243MUSD and generating a loss-making revenue of around 15MUSD. And let's remember Mura, another iteration in this space with the latest private investment by KBR at over 1BnUSD valuation with a plan to recycle up to 1M tons of plastic waste by 2030. So, when I look at all these less effective comparables and the current valuation of Aduro, I am blown away by anyone who says Aduro is anything but undervalued, especially when we put this in the context that plastic upscaling is one of many verticals that Aduro is addressing and that they can address the 80%+ of that market that none of the other 70+ technologies in this space touch** * **Contrary to the claim that revenue growth is challenging, a deeper dive reveals that Aduro is poised for significant growth. With six companies, five of which are multi-billion dollar players, testing and potentially collaborating with Aduro, the company is set to generate substantial revenue. Aduro’s projection of two of these companies increasing their testing revenue from 100-200k/year to 500-1M dollars per year could result in 1 to 2M dollars of revenue for Aduro. This, combined with the transition from R2 plastic to R3 plastic and the potential for additional collaborations, could see Aduro generating c. 10MUSD by 2026, more than enough to sustain the company's growth or c. 13MCAD/year, which is more than enough to cover Aduro’s burn by then assuming the burn doubles from current levels (from 5 to 6M/year to 10 to 12M/year). This places no value on other potential customers wanting to test the technology through the Customer Engagement program, nor does it touch on any licensing revenue that they might have by then. It also places zero value on any of the other verticals Aduro has (heavy oil, renewables, etc.), which will most likely bring in revenues and/or grants to Aduro.** * **Addressing the Go public and giving away 55% of the Company to the RTO holders. Again a very high-level superficial claim as Aduro’s management decided to align themselves with shareholders and not get their entire Equity holding unless they hit certain milestones, so when they agreed to that initial RTO structure, they only received one-third of their share ownership, and then they received another one-third post third party validation, with one last tranche pending (although they have met one of the six criteria to be granted the rest of their shares. Additionally, Aduro would have been purchased for equity by a large US O&G in 2020, whereby Aduro would have sold for a massive premium relative to the RTO route. COVID-19 happened, and Oil went negative, and that deal fell apart. At the time, Aduro's main focus was heavy oil upgrading. Then, as they needed more capital during COVID-19, the only route they found (as non-capital market people) was going through the RTO route via Dimension Five, which was owned and maintained by Zimtu Capital for two years plus. The terms of the RTO were not ideal, but it was either that or 11 years of work down the drain..in any case, anyone who has done their diligence realizes that a significant value got unlocked since the IPO, and in reality, the main vertical today, being plastic was pursued post the IPO via the funding obtained since the IPO.** * **Addressing the Investor Relations again: as far as I know, there are the following active IR contracts: 1) OTBC - these are the same network that got Aduro in Jake Tran's YouTube channel, which I follow. Jake is very selective in the Companies he covers, and none of the companies I have seen outside of Aduro are public. I view this as the only actual IR contract right now and I think the extension is mainly to get new/signficant YouTube coverage from similar channels 2) Crystal Research: this is not an IR contract in my opinion; Jeffrey Kraws:** [**https://www.linkedin.com/in/jjkraws/**](https://www.linkedin.com/in/jjkraws/) **is a well-followed analyst (mainly covering Biotech stocks and pre-revenue disruptive Tech) and has access to a massive network of investors, which he will approach once their research report is ready. So, the 50,000 USD that Aduro has paid is for the cost of putting the research report together and distributing it. Jeff often appears on mainstream media outlets such as CNBC. It would be a fantastic exposure for him to mention Aduro on such outlets in due course  3) ArrowHeads, at this juncture, are being paid to set roadshows to meet investors in the US, which is excellent as the Company needs to expand its footprint towards family offices and institutions in the US instead of the retail crowd. Arrowhead is doing this for 50,000 USD over six months (c. 8.4k per month). I asked Mariusz, and he advised that he is not under contract (as in he is not getting paid by Aduro for his videos etc). As for Ryan from Independent Investor, the guy charged Aduro 6k to create 12 videos and owns over 50k shares he paid for. As far as the latest video they did with the View Point project, which was paid for earlier in 2023 and took two months+ in preparation, Aduro only covered the cost of production, which was c. 50kUSD and the View Point team would make their money via ads on major TV channels. In a nutshell, I think those who keep harping on the excessive IR contracts are clueless and have no idea what took place vs reality**

jbasket444

Investing is not a team game, and nobody is telling you that it is a team game here. I have also mentioned before in previous posts that this setup is feasible with or without retail participation. I cannot speak for anybody else and what they say. Again, as mentioned, if you don't believe my statement and interpretation/best estimate about the dividend strategy, contact IR about the dividend strategy then. I base it from personal experience. YMMV.

jbasket444

They will pay a dividend as many institutional investors hold millions of shares in RILY, and the full cut of dividend will result in a huge selloff. Fully cutting the remainder of it is a true last resort. Feel free to call their IR if you don't believe I am right that this would be their corporate strategy.

Jessejames275

A guy tried to use ChatGPT to make "As much money as possible" and... it didn't go as well as he thought... [How One Guy Tried Using ChatGPT to Launch a Business With Just $100 (businessinsider.com)](https://www.businessinsider.com/how-to-use-chatgpt-to-start-business-make-money-quickly-2023-3?r=US&IR=T#:~:text=A%20guy%20tried%20using%20ChatGPT,the%20AI%20chatbot%20gave%20him.&text=Jackson%20Greathouse%20Fall%20asked%20ChatGPT,website%20about%20eco%2Dfriendly%20products.)

ben_salander27

Auto is the majority around 90% Services ~5% Energy ~3% As revenue grows these will grow too. Percentages can stay small or the same and the revenue can grow quite a bit. Tesla IR has a bunch is slides outlining everything.

AnotherGreatDane

Read get rich with options. Also when you buy: always buy in the money AND minimize intrinsic value as IR is worth noting but hope. And the opposite for puts.

zhouyu24

Hi sorry I deleted my comment. I don't see that actually. Tell me what you mean specifically. [2023 Q4 Quarterly Update Deck (tesla.com)](https://digitalassets.tesla.com/tesla-contents/image/upload/IR/TSLA-Q4-2023-Update.pdf)

Only_Regret_2221

Again the attacks are nothing more than a distraction. Have you found a date? I have email IR directly at $HOLO hoping for clarification. You can assume what you’d like. Good day sir

dontgetbannedagain3

https://www.businessinsider.com/a-standard-feature-is-proving-deadly-on-armored-suvs-2012-2?IR=T#:~:text=According%20to%20the%20Washington%20Post,Mexico%20when%20the%20incident%20occurred.

Accomplished-Tell223

i guess etrade ameritrade charles schwab anything that trades penny stocks or for more guidance check the companys website and contact IR [cbih.net](http://cbih.net)

UsuallylurknotToday

Good luck with your pro gaming or pro lying career. Surely your parents Tucked enough away in their IRÁ that you can live off of it until you’re 35.

kill1anotherpop

Future is bright because halving + hopefully IR drop by JPOW, and etf buy pressure is huge

ZENOXEON

Guided numbers include SBC as per footnote 2 on page 12 for Q4 IR report.

PapaCharlie9

Too bad there is no such thing as a "LEAP", otherwise the pun would have been a winner. People, it's always LEAPS, because it's an acronym, like IRS. You don't say "an IR" and you don't say "a LEAP."

Old-Improvement-1333

I exercised my IR call last week. I was up over 500% and I wanted to exercised before the ex div date. Over all I want to own the shares long term so I was able to buy at a 10%+ discount

RockyCreamNHotSauce

Just repeating bull analysts projections. Gary Black sliced his estimates down to 1% growth after meeting with Tesla IR. Troy is gradually reducing his projections too. It started with 470-480k consensus. It’ll be 420-430k by end of the month.

spirited_redemption

https://www.businessinsider.com/nvidia-stock-cathie-wood-ark-cisco-ai-internet-bubble-microchips-2024-3?international=true&r=US&IR=T Thoughts on Cathie's comments?

Necessary-Onion-7494

I was looking into what companies are there with forward PE lower than 30 and I bumped into IR. Sat to see that the only conversation is from 3 years ago.

zarconi

you should really mention this is paid promotion as you are an IR firm paid for services. And judging by the upvotes and lack of comments on all your post, look to be trying to manipulate the system to get this more views

self-assembled

Specifically blocks all IR light.

ameerricle

Nice, more $45k vehicles during high IR rates. Exactly what a saturated market needs. Start making smaller crossovers and cheap LFP battery packs versions

czarxander

Yes, it is... Per the IR: "CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (Nasdaq: CRWD), a global cybersecurity leader that provides cloud-delivered protection of endpoints, cloud workloads, identity and data..." Endpoint security has, is, and will always to be the bulk of their sales. To say otherwise is misinformed.

AP9384629344432

> the numbers are still good Care to expand? Which numbers specifically are you referring to? I'm assuming it's not the operating margin which is now lower than that of Toyota. Nor is it the automotive revenue growth which is 1% YoY. Total revenues were up 3% thanks to the newer energy storage business + services. But those are tiny portions of the overall business. Apparently saboteurs just cost them $1B in damage in their German plant. The numbers are going to be bad in the near term due to Chinese EV competition and brutal price cuts in the sector. The cash position is good I guess. If you want to construct a bull case, you have to look ahead at least 1-2 years and assume their non-auto tech developments are big successes. Aswath Damodaran is actually somewhat neutral/bullish on Tesla, if you watch some of his recent valuation videos / interviews, and his reasoning gives some probability that its futuristic bets turn successful. [You can see a full detailed valuation here](https://aswathdamodaran.substack.com/p/tesla-in-november-2023-story-twists) Morgan Stanley's analyst just took his price target to $320 from $340, but more importantly, after a meeting with Tesla IR said management indicated auto gross margins could continue to worsen in 2024. His 2024 adjusted EPS estimate is $1.51 (implying 116 forward P/E). Street estimate is $3.07 (forward P/E of 57). So if this analyst think the stock is a double, it's not because of near term earnings. His model shows a massive spike in earnings in 2026 and after, which is why his price target is so high. The CEO appears to spend most of his time Tweeting and fighting unrelated legal battles. Moreover, his 20% stake in Tesla is more of a liability as it is a pool of capital he may sell down to finance his other interests. In summary: You have to be a believer, and have conviction that the current troubles are surmountable given the valuation. But the downside risk is always going to be large when the valuation is as high as it currently is. Me personally? I don't find auto companies good investments.

Kooky_Lime1793

I just received this from IR   "Our earnings release is available at [Vermilion Energy Inc. Announces Results for the Year Ended December 31](https://www.vermilionenergy.com/invest-with-us/press-releases/press-release-detail/?id=122831). There are after-market trading hours that we have to consider, so material releases are typically made after 15:00 MT (17:00 ET)."

Kooky_Lime1793

no its not out yet, IR said it would be at 'Market Close'

Bxdwfl

[https://investors.carvana.com/\~/media/Files/C/Carvana-IR/documents/cvna-earning-release-q3-2023.pdf](https://investors.carvana.com/~/media/Files/C/Carvana-IR/documents/cvna-earning-release-q3-2023.pdf) page 3. far right column.

jbasket444

It may. This is why I have weeklies expiring before the dividend, incase of the PnD before it. Note that the insiders often buy stock with the dividends they receive. I'm expecting the dip to be short lived. I had a call with IR, and they told me that keeping the dividend was essential for many funds to stay invested (millions of shares accordingly). The dividend lowers liquidity as a result, as these investors typically don't actively trade.

bugsmaru

Just want to let you know you’re 100 percent right but for some reason being smart gets you downvoted in this sub. Your parents are paying a financial advisor to lose money relative to the stock market. Listen to Warren buffet: https://youtu.be/gj2IR6ah_EQ?si=goF4b8zpc9zMtiaW Read John Bogle’s book, common sense investing. Read Malkiel’s a random walk down wallsteet. You are on the right track. Everyone else in this sub is wrong.

CompSciFutures

Google is playing, they’re just not being noisy about it. You know how secretive Goggle are about their flagship products. The other stuff is just “labs” projects (yes some quite profitable). I’ve been watching the changes to their search index very closely for many years and I think what we’re seeing is that they’re quietly integrating LLMs into the search engine itself, without obviously changing the UX and progressing cautiously and carefully so that things l like hallucinations don’t cause problems like what we recently saw with LexisNexis. Sidebar on Bing: I was watching Bing closely as well after it was rebuilt (literally had lunch with a bunch of InfoRec specialists shortly after they finished it so I had the DL), but stopped using it recently as it became obvious the search engine isn’t safe to use anymore in many ways since the core microsoft team took over: - malvertising getting inserted into premium placements right above the search box, - lots of unsafe links to sites with drive by downloads, - someone worked out how to manipulate the inverted indices so that Bing’s results didn’t match the internet, - surfacing stolen content directly into the search UI, and - too much psyops risk, like the UI was almost hypnotic and dreamy at times. Dunno where it’s at now, but it got so bad that I just couldn’t keep running experiments anymore and no amount of VM isolation could create a safe environment. Back to Google: The most obvious thing to the untrained eye is more multi-modality to the image and video results returned and a lot more “question answering” styled search results. Question Answering has been an open research topic in IR for decades and what Google are doing with it and AI is impressive. You possibly haven t noticed, but that’s okay, that’s the intention - to be seamless. To the trained eye that can do Forensic Information Retrieval, the index is being updated weekly. These are not just small changes to the boosting section of the ranking like the usual SEO update that we’ve seen in the past - these are big changes to the architecture of the inverted indices themselves and everything that sits on top of that, like fundamentally changing the way search is done, but incrementally. Out of all the AI companies doing AI with LLMs, Google is the only one that understands that LLMs are just another information retrieval system and that all the theory and rigour that goes with that still applies. The rest are just plowing ahead into an abyss of Gilbert Spaces [sic], like cowboys at a rodeo trying to win the big race: do they know if they are in the right race? The changes Google are making are technically massive and the journey a bit bumpy, eg the problems Elon recently complained about, but to the average user they are non-obvious at first glance. Those biases will be fixed and are symptomatic of LLMs and not in line with the making the world’s information available. Small bump that will be fixed, nothing to see here nothing to see. They’ve been trying a lot of new things for quite some time, and I think are currently trying to get a couple top secret algorithms that aren’t publicly known to work in concert with the LLM - that will take some time, its counterpart took 2 years to get right (but started to see some production use within the first months of development). There won’t be any announcements about any of this until the changes are considered finished: for example, Quality Score was well integrated into the rankings and ad platform long before it was announced. If you want to test it yourself, think of your search query as a prompt and that there is a context window in the background of that search box, so you can split your single “innermost thought and desire” (what we define a search query as) across a sequence of search queries now, sort of like chain of thought reasoning, but more user friendly / requiring less overt planning. To test it, type your “innermost thought and desire” into the search box for your “first query”, then do some some subsequent queries to expand/change/uodate the scope and add stuff to the context window, then repeat the first query and see how much the results have changed - if you do it right, the results will be VERY different. This is what we call finding the “current context and disposition of the user”, ie, what they are thinking about vs what they typed (NB. I’ve used the word context twice here and they both have different meanings: first is from LLM, the second is from Information Retrieval fields). Dynamically changing the search results by conditioning recent queries into the ranked results (“10 blue links”) for the latest query isn’t new, but changing the results so dramatically most certainly is. In the past when you went back to that first query it wouldn’t change that much: this is totally different. It’s looking like they’re trying to quietly move us to a world with all the power of perplexity, ChstGPT and MJ, without: - any of the legal issues associated with stealing content and rendering it directly into the search results, - negatively affecting all those small businesses that are dependent on Google traffic to survive, and - with the same user experience we have grown to know and love. This is what is meant by “Don’t be Evil”. Keep in mind, Google is over 90% of search worldwide, so any dramatic change to the UX is going to affect alot of people and that simple UI metaphor of “one box, 10 blue links” has been a winning strategy for a very long time. Think it through: given all those constraints, all those stakeholders, all those pre-existing expectations, how does one deploy powerful AI at scale at Google? Obviously through the flagship product, their search engine, but how? You are witnessing it before your very eyes, but you can’t see it. Look again based on this new information, and you might just catch a glimpse of a major commitment to AI at Google. Now that you know how to look, keep looking every week and watch it progress - it’s quite entertaining. Then go look at a screenshot of Windows 3.1 vs Windows 11 - same, but different, yeah? Which one has AI baked into it? Which one should and shouldn’t? Do you want your AI to get all up in your face and demand commands from you, or do you want it to be an invisible assistant, quietly making your digital world easier and more frictionless so that your real world is better and you have more time for it? So, the question is not who is in the AI race - the question is, who is in the right race? You know, like the fable of the tortoise and the hair. Place your bets gentlemen, place your bets. .\p

Schmuf84

Where would the news be published? I had a look at their IR side but it somehow looks like it wasnt updated in quite a while.

Atriev

It's all found on the IR page of their website. The document is quite long and it's confusing to look at. Pre-IPO, you can see that they divided their share ownership into "founder," "management," and "sponsor." Whenever you invest in this stock, you're buying "Dutch Bros OpCo." But that's not the end of it, after the IPO, you now have different classes of common stock. I don't want to get into it but this shit is fucking complicated. Moral of the story, VIEs are generally created to benefit/protect the voting rights of the founders/corporate holders, not the shareholders.

Atriev

It's all found on the IR page of their website. The document is quite long and it's confusing to look at. Pre-IPO, you can see that they divided their share ownership into "founder," "management," and "sponsor." Whenever you invest in this stock, you're buying "Dutch Bros OpCo." But that's not the end of it, after the IPO, you now have different classes of common stock. I don't want to get into it but this shit is fucking complicated. Moral of the story, VIEs are generally created to benefit/protect the voting rights of the founders/corporate holders, not the shareholders.

blevster

Totally—I advise companies with their IR messaging. This is something that happens all the time with companies who were burning cash. Oddly enough, the CEO and CFO are often on board with changing the calc, but defer to the GC or head of accounting who are against due to the risk that they’ll trigger a response from the SEC.

beninho2

I’ve googled and didn’t find a definite answer, besides contacting the IR department of the current company, which I’ve done. Figured people here might know more or have had a similar experience before, hence the question. If you’ve got nothing helpful to say, maybe just don’t? :)

Jeff__Skilling

.....have you watched any Disney (and, really, their Marvel and LucasFilms franchises) over the last 5ish years? There's a noticeable change and.....I'm just having a hard time believing that said very noticeable change was catalyzed by somebody in corporate finance / strategy / corp dev / IR....... Like, it's **very** clear that around 2018 - 2020 somebody new was brought in to a leadership role, because that change is, as noted above, quite palpable.....not sure who that person is / could be tbh (....and not necessarily Kathleen Kennedy, but......of the same ilk)

Bronco4bay

Companies are not laying workers off like crazy, Jesus Christ are you people capable of even reading the IR reports you goon over in this subreddit? If a company hires 30000 people during the pandemic years but lays off 2000 this year, that is NOT A CRAZY LAYOFF.

rt9o

They're given at analyst conferences. You can check the company's IR page for the webcast the day of the presentation

JesusWantsYouToKnow

That's fair, but Toto's nicer model for example *definitely* rely on "tech" to function. There things learn your habits and try to save power by only pre-heating the seat when it thinks you'll be around to use it, for example. They also have IR remote controls and user profiles that set defaults for things like seat and water temperature, *positioning*, and stuff like that. The basic "turn a knob" bidets are so much better than using TP, but there _is_ tech in use as you get out of the entry level class. Now, if they ever want to connect my bidet to the internet I'm out.

SevereAd6270

I took a cursory look at their financial statements and guidance, and I think you’re right. Their IR made me chuckle—they have a disclosure on short selling (from early 2023) LOL & goes onto explain GAAP (with examples to boot). BUT the market is bullish on anything AI right now. Then you absorb that their ticker is literally “AI” & what ideas that will put in all the dearly beloved regards’ minds. Plus, lingering effects from last week’s boom. My thinking is flat post-earnings if beat OR precipitous drop if it’s a miss/met. Best of luck to you!

mr_molecular

Read there last quarterly reports and listen to the calls on their IR pages.

Dogs_For_Congress

Just keep getting automated replies: “Many thanks for contacting the Flutter IR team. Your patience is appreciated as we work to answer your investor query.” OP, any luck?

Ermahgerd_Sterks

NVDA drops 0.01 and bears be like: OMG HERE IR IS THE BLACK SWAN DOT COM CRASH 2.0 SELL SELL SELL SELL REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

mr_molecular

I contacted AYR IR to see if the AYR warrants would eventually be listed on the OTC. IR was very responsive, unfortunately the warrants will not be listed on the OTC. My broker, Fidelity charges a $33 international trading fee to trade these warrants.

raidx90

I followed up with the IR team at Flutter today again. Will report back once I hear anything.

Ill-Ad3311

Just like 4IR , will come and be gone like a fart in the wind

Bossie81

Bought back in. I figured. Either they announce a BO Or Takeda or Ono is buying shares. There is NO explanation whatsoever for this movement. So, went back in at 2 euro. Willing to average down if it tanls Had an email convo with Michael from IR, he pointed out data is to be expected

SPAC_Time

Looks like some SPACs have come up with a new devious way to make SPAC investing even riskier; this time with the warrants. Of course we all know that if the SPAC liquidates, the warrants expire worthless. But what happens when the SPAC completes the business combination, but then refuses to list the warrants on any exchange? This just happened with Chenghe Acquisition Co ( CHEA CHEAW ). CHEAW warrants were delisted by NASDAQ on October 12, 2023; and have not been listed on any exchange since. The prospectus said they will not be listed after the business combination, [which just closed yesterday](https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2024/02/15/2830425/0/en/Semilux-International-Ltd-and-Taiwan-Color-Optics-Inc-a-Taiwan-based-provider-of-LiDAR-and-ADB-components-and-solutions-together-with-Chenghe-Acquisition-Co-Announce-Closing-of-Bus.html), while the common stock starts trading as SELX today. "[Chenghe has not made application](https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1990950/000121390023099895/ff42023a2_semiluxinter.htm#:~:text=Chenghe%20has%20not%20made%20application) for the SPAC Public Warrants to be listed on the OTC markets, and Chenghe is not aware of any plan of CayCo to apply for the listing of CayCo Warrants on any stock exchange after the Closing " It also happened with Abri SPAC I ( ASPA ASPAW ), which completed the business combination with Collective Audience on November 3, 2023. The ASPA prospectus said: "[We have filed a listing application with Nasdaq](https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1854583/000121390023081115/f424b30923_abrispac1inc.htm#:~:text=Combined%20Company.%E2%80%9D-,We%20have%20filed%20a%20listing%20application%20with%20Nasdaq,-to%20list%20the) to list the Combined Company’s shares of Common Stock and Warrants on Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol “CAUD” and “CAUDW”. " Then when the business combination closed, "[On November 3, 2023, the Company](https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1854583/000121390023084420/ea187789-8k_collective.htm#:~:text=On%20November%203%2C%202023%2C%20the%20Company%E2%80%99s)’s Common Stock began trading on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol “CAUD.” the warrants to purchase Common Stock will begin trading on OTC under the symbol “CAUDW”. " However, CAUDW is still not listed on any exchange. One warrant holder [has detailed his experience](https://www.reddit.com/r/Spacstocks/comments/18fuymm/collective_audience_appoints_technology_visionary/) with CAUDW on r/spacstocks, they have repeatedly attempted to contacted IR, who have essentially ignored them with a "sucks to be you" attitude. If the SEC allows this behavior, SPAC warrant investors end up trapped with warrants that cannot be publicly tradeable, which will show a $0 value in their portfolio, and which will remain there until they expire in five years before the holder can finally declare the loss. Or, if the company should do well enough that the warrants end up in the money, have to cash exercise the warrants in able to achieve the gain, rather than sell them.

CaptainHoey

I bought a bunch of IR calls for earnings today simply because they have the same name as my girlfriend’s last name. wish me luck regards.

BitterAd6419

Their IR is already below zero. They gonna pivot now and make it -1 % ?

Sober_Snoop85

Dan Ahrens : Happy that after lots of communicating with  @BNYMellon & @Curaleaf_IR  we got $CURA $CURLF off the non-permissible list & ready to custody. Soon across BNYM & @Pershing. I still have transaction work to follow. Happy #ValentinesDay #MSOGang #cannabis. Share! --> this is a big deal 

Jeff__Skilling

> How does this happen? Who's fault is it? CFO and the entire IR dept. Baffling how fucking ***nobody*** tied out the fucking ER PDF before posting it...

LetsPlay30k

I mean for the general public, not insider knowledge. For example, AMAT report their earning at 4pm tomorrow, at that exact time, should I go to their Investor relation page, SEC or news like yahoo and Bloomberg. I don’t think the news would be as fast as IR page and SEC, would they?

ItinerantDrifter

“Happy that after lots of communicating with @BNYMellon & @Curaleaf_IR we got $CURA $CURLF off the non-permissible list & ready to custody. Soon across BNYM & @Pershing. I still have transaction work to follow. Happy #ValentinesDay #MSOGang #cannabis. Share!” - Dan Ahrens on Twitter/X

BoomTownRat71

Having been on the governence end of an earnings release, and this is a major problem. There are multiple layers of controls involved in preparation and disclosure of earnings, and these things rarely happen. I’d pin this on the IR team who ultimately has to make sure that the release conforms with the audited financials filed on 8-K.

slumdungo

I mean, I hear you, but this isn’t an accounting error. This is a reporting error. IR and FP&A are probably getting lit up tomorrow (even though there are numerous guilty parties here). This smells like a burnt out finance department that was grinding till the last minute.

ListerineInMyPeehole

I don’t get how this happens. How many sets of eyes were on this? The annual forecast should have been done and locked last month. They had a solid 2 weeks to finish up their IR documents.

smashmouthallstar420

Yup. I work in IR. Reporting, legal, external auditors, the CFO and CEO all serve as "extra eyes" for earnings releases.

ListerineInMyPeehole

Head of IR and possibly Comms + Legal

_mynameisclarence

IR guy / girl is for sure fired.

BillysCoinShop

He said the same thing last time, and he let a few go under to be bought up by Goldman etc. for cents on the dollar, while simultaneously opening up a loan facility which small banks used to take money and then literally put that money into the Feds repo facility for IR arbitrage. It’s like when he says “we need to keep rates elevated to fight inflation” but is simultaneously printing trillions for Congress and then wondering why inflation won’t go down.

ninkorn

Bruh, heads will roll at Investor Relations, Public Affairs and Legal @ Lyft after that typo in the press release, which also went to SEC That shit is supposed to get scrubbed and scrutinized throughly by multiple people (accountants, lawyers, PR, IR) for 3 weeks before the earnings. 🤡 show over there at Lyft

JamesBondMI6007

IR isn’t moving downward until June at the earliest, Powell already said regional banks are going to default and he’s okay with that. 

BillysCoinShop

Everything is bullish because: Higher IR for longer means more risk of default, which means Powell will have to capitulate faster And Lowering IR is bullish because it means Powell has already capitulated

Basedshark01

Lyft IR junior - reveal yourself

Spectacl323

The analyst on Lyfts IR team who wrote **500** bps EBITDA expansion instead of **50** bps..

fastlapp

Emailed IR and they said: "Unfortunately, your warrants have an exercise price that exceeds the $4.875 bid and will have no value assuming the transaction closes." Ofc, they are wrong and probably just unfamiliar with 4.4. But given the half warrants and remaining term, don't think it will be much.

AlphaSh_t

Don’t be silly, it’s Wall Street, the equity research analysts work with the company’s IR on the models to the extent they legally can get away with

raidx90

Thanks. I also reached out to their IR team (different email). Let’s see what they say.

zetaconvex

https://www.businessinsider.com/forgetful-investors-performed-best-2014-9?r=US&IR=T O'Shaughnessy: "Fidelity had done a study as to which accounts had done the best at Fidelity. And what they found was..." Ritholtz: "They were dead." O'Shaughnessy: "...No, that's close though! They were the accounts of people who forgot they had an account at Fidelity."

PapaCharlie9

There is no such thing as "LEAPs". LEAPS is an acronym, like IRS. LEAPS is not the plural of LEAP, just like IRS is not the plural of IR. It's also clearer to specify put or call. So one LEAPS call, two LEAPS calls. My first feedback is that you have too much concentration in SPY and QQQ. You already have SPY and QQQ shares, why have calls on SPY at all? What is that buying you that you couldn't get through, for example, calls on XSP or SPX? Or just skip the calls altogether? Second, cash is not a hedge for anything, least of all calls. Puts could be a hedge. So could shorted shares. What is it that you think the cash is doing, other that accumulating opportunity cost?

chrisfs

thanks for the reminder I need to get on my taxes or the IR is going to be on my butt something fierce

PapaCharlie9

> Im think about buying a Deep ITM LEAP on nike. I think the stock is oversold, and id like to buy the dip. > > Im interested in using Deep ITM LEAPs to use leverage and not tie up took much of my capital. There is no such thing as "a LEAP" and "LEAPs" is not the plural or LEAP. LEAPS is an acronym, like IRS, so you don't drop the S to form the singular. It's not one IR audit, two IRS audits. It's one LEAPS call, two LEAPS calls. Always spell it out as LEAPS and then add put(s) or call(s) to make it clear which one you are talking about. ------------- I agree with the other reply that you can avoid tying up more capital by buying shares, just less than 100 shares. Spend that 20% of your account on shares instead of a call. The only thing you would be giving up is leverage, but you gain: * Dividend payments * Marginable equity * No worrying about an expiration date * No worrying about theta decay Is the screenshot supposed to provide additional information? Because it doesn't seem to have any connection to your post, since it's about TQQQ puts.

frankjohnsen

They have some stats on their marketing in the presentation: [https://investor.elfbeauty.com/\~/media/Files/E/ELF-IR/documents/event-and-presentation/elf-beauty-fq3-fy24-earnings-presentation.pdf](https://investor.elfbeauty.com/~/media/Files/E/ELF-IR/documents/event-and-presentation/elf-beauty-fq3-fy24-earnings-presentation.pdf) Somewhere around page 45-50

thealphaexponent

The company that merged with the company formed from the merger of the Boston & Albany and NY Central went bankrupt. After a lot more M&A action, etc., CSX owns most of the assets of what used to be Boston & Albany. You can contact their IR but unlikely they'll come back with much. On the other hand, the stock certificates might have collectible value.

_hiddenscout

Anyone here follow PRIM? Another infrastructure company that deals with more energy and pipeline infrastucture. Seems to have a lot of growth coming in. Just announced like 1.1B worth of projects today: [https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20240205999134/en/Primoris-Services-Corporation-Receives-Projects-Valued-at-Approximately-1.1-Billion](https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20240205999134/en/Primoris-Services-Corporation-Receives-Projects-Valued-at-Approximately-1.1-Billion) This is their latest investor presentation: https://ir.prim.com/\~/media/Files/P/Primoris-IR-v2/presentations/2023/the-power-of-primoris-investor-presentation-nov-2023.pdf

SpaceCatVII

UMC sales increase Jan: [https://www.umc.com/en/IR\_Financial/monthly\_sales\_revenue?param1=2024](https://www.umc.com/en/IR_Financial/monthly_sales_revenue?param1=2024)

SpaceCatVII

UMC Jan 2024 sales out: https://www.umc.com/en/IR_Financial/monthly_sales_revenue?param1=2024