IR

Horror_Stock6024

MBOT up about 20% this week on announcement of their first office-based customer (ELMNT IR). Purchased/ agreed to a 12mo supply of LIBERTY systems. ELMNT IR co-founder, Dr. Steinberger, is singing its praises. Think it's seen its bottom, but NFA

wantingfutility

yeah but is any mgmt that worked with him still around? sounds like horrible governance. IR is nonexistent. C suite should be backing up the truck and buying at these levels. Very sus the last few days with high volume and near 52 week lows.

FreakUCK

 Spend that money, little man. Still gonna kick ya off this land.

ExplanationNormal339

The only stated evidence is a timestamped IR-site absence, not a company confirmation. That supports treating the Q3 reporting schedule as unknown rather than assigning a date. Was an earnings press release also unavailable?

BadaBingSil

* **meta:** revenue **$64.60b vs $63.33b expected**. gaap eps **$3.83**, but that includes a **$9.89b legal charge**. excluding it, eps was **$7.40**. q4 revenue guide **$73b-$76b** and 2026 capex narrowed higher to **$135b-$145b**. strong core business, but insane spending and negative **$2.12b free cash flow** are the problem. [meta release](https://s21.q4cdn.com/399680738/files/content_files/Meta-09-30-2026-Exhibit-99-1_FINAL.pdf) * **tesla:** revenue **$28.10b**, slightly below roughly **$28.34b expected**. adjusted eps **$0.50 vs $0.45**, but gaap eps was only **$0.22**. automotive gross margin excluding credits improved to **18.1%**, while operating margin was **2.6%**. mixed print, better underlying auto margin and cash generation, weak actual profitability. [tesla deck](https://assets-ir.tesla.com/tesla-contents/IR/TSLA-Q3-2026-Update.pdf) * **lrcx:** initial headline is **$8.20b revenue vs roughly $8.15b expected**, so another record-ish AI/memory equipment print. full guidance and call details are still filling in. the real meta headline is not “eps disaster.” it is **revenue beat + $7.40 underlying eps, offset by gigantic capex and cash burn**.

SpicA332

ㄴ person who miswrote GH/IR as GH/R.

SpicA332

yeah you are amateur. offset means anyway paid the A\\R, although it's not money. of course Gh/IR is normal

littorio

By audit report, do you mean quarterly financial statements with independent auditor review report? Because Samsung Electronics do release their financial statements both in Koreans and English on their IR page, and their earnings call is also translated to english live during call. So yes, rest of the world can know other “half” of the AI industry you are referring to.

jocem009

Not the first nor the last betrayal remember the kurds I sure do, wrote my bachelor thesis tryna explain why the US acted they did came to the conclusion that irrationality played a good part aside from regular schools of IR

Valkyrie_Skuld

IR made me pissed off literally all the time

Bravadette

IR

Valkyrie_Skuld

is it XR or IR because I'd rather take nothing than take IR

Imaginary_Rooster622

They wouldn't be repaying this if they didn't think IR refund was imminent

Life-Industry-1131

Everyone I drafted died Benches in each league have a 1-2 rounder on IR

imustbegthequestion

Be banished to H3LL in the Ecuador pit mines with IR3N.

Valkyrie_Skuld

Girl you have someone on IR switch him out

AzureLainCapital

Officially filed on Edgar yesterday voluntarily https://investorshub.advfn.com/stock-market/USOTC/protext-mobility-id-TXTM/stock-news/99404790/form-8-k-current-report There really is no “see how it plays” if you get in it’s based on due diligence and believing they execute Execute what? The uplist cause if that happens price should re-rate 600 million dollar asset base that may convert to $10B+ Before factoring in the rest of the business pipeline that is still getting worked on Uplist alone with institutions getting in (if they get in) Moves the price alone Odds of them executing? Like I said the chairmen has near 900m shares accumulated over 2 years, never sold, and never diluted the company with debt or notes Actually that 8K came with a video from the IR side that hints at tsx (Toronto stock exchange) and hints at jse In short they literally tell you the roadmap/goals/intentions Just waiting now This is not a “nothing happened in 1 month it’s a dud” It’s a hold as long as fundamentals get better over time and in the last 2 years things have only gotten better Price sucks due to otc liquidity but that’s what the uplist is for…

Guinness

Muse is just a cloud hosted version of OpenClaw. All of these people handing Facebook their logins and personal information are [dumb fucks](https://www.businessinsider.com/well-these-new-zuckerberg-ims-wont-help-facebooks-privacy-problems-2010-5?IR=T). They "trust him".

dbixon

Hello "fellow investor". Happy to give my thoughts: \> CEO said... Does that suggest Clyra may be further along than your write-up assumes? Unfortunately BioLargo has a very long history of projecting-then-failing aggressive timelines. For example, around this time last year, the CEO said he thought the BioClynse launch would take place in Q1/Q2 of 2026, which obviously didn't happen. I've spoken with their IR representative (from Darrow) about this, and he said that unexpected delays tend to happen when involved with a partner whose decisions are made independently, as is the case here (CEO has confirmed it's entirely in the partner's hands). Because of this, **my write-up doesn't assume any particular timeline, only stating that submission for FDA approval is due "soon".** \> A fellow large investor believes that Clyra will be worth well north of $500 million... do you think that is a realistic outcome? That would be great, and I'm certainly not ruling it out, but for now Clyra has to get its product on shelves first. Echoing what I said previously, BioLargo has a very long history of offering large potential valuations and peppering their presentations with "best-case-scenario" numbers. One particular investor has gone to great lengths to saturate social media with these wishful projections (maybe we're talking about the same person). While I appreciate that person's persistence and thoroughness, I think some damage has been done, as all of their projections have fallen short thus far and people grow tired of the boy who cried wolf. After all, the stock is at an all-time low. That person's believers are all currently holding bags and rightfully upset at the moment, which is why **I'm encouraging potential investors to watch for now, not buy.** Perhaps things would be different if this was the first time blast-off news was "right around the corner" rather than the fifteenth time. \> What would be your trigger to buy? Focusing on Clyra/BioClynse, I offer four triggers to buy depending on your risk profile: Aggressive = when the FDA application is submitted, Medium = when the FDA submission comes back approved, or Conservative = when the first material purchase order is made (which should align with identifying the major partner), or Super-Conservative = when first revenue is reported. FDA review typically takes 90 days, so that's plenty of time right there for medium-risk investors to noodle. \> If investors wait until recurring revenue is obvious, do you think the risk/reward will still be as attractive? I believe so, yes. 8c/shr may (hopefully) be the ground floor, but new investors can wait until this hits 15c (45M market-cap) and still get in lower than most current shareholders. Given how depressed existing shareholders are at the moment, I anticipate some "break-even" selling as the stock begins to rise, creating enough liquidity for new investors to hop in before it (hopefully) rockets. \> Could much of the repricing occur between now, launch confirmation, and the first visible sales ramp? Anything's possible, but I highly doubt it. What would be the catalyst for such a repricing? As I said before, this isn't the first time in BioLargo's history that blast-off news is "right around the corner." One merely has to search for $BLGO here on reddit to see. Even if someone claimed to have insider information and the FDA application was being submitted tomorrow, I doubt that would move the needle much, as there have been too many head-fakes. This is why **I'm encouraging potential investors to watch for now, not buy**. If BioLargo's thesis ever begins to legitimately take off, there will be plenty of time and liquidity to secure a decent entry point. Hope this helps!

Ill-Ad1603

I’m building a probabilistic equity-research agent implemented as a modular research application that 1. Collects evidence 2. Normalizes and validates that evidence 3. Runs multiple specialized analytical engines 4. Identifies conflicts and interactions between variables 5. Determines what the market already expects 6. Builds conditional future paths 7. Synthesizes those paths probabilistically and determine the most probable 6–12 month trajectory 8. Produces a traceable investment-research conclusion What I’m building isn’t an AI trading bot, a stock-picking tool, or something that tells you whether a stock is a “buy” or “sell.” It also isn’t primarily a DCF model that tries to calculate what a stock should be worth. It’s more like an equity research engine. You give it a stock, and it thoroughly analyzes everything that could influence its performance over the next 6–12 months, the company’s fundamentals, earnings and analyst expectations, catalysts, competition, valuation, macroeconomic environment, and market narrative/sentiment. It then tries to determine the most probable trajectory for the stock over the next 6–12 months, rather than simply giving you a bull case and a bear case. The output is essentially a probability distribution of possible price trajectories, for example, what probability the system assigns to the stock ending up around $X, $Y, $Z, etc., based on the information and expectations available today. So the goal isn’t to tell you what to buy. It’s to build a very thorough, evidence-based model of where a stock is most likely headed and what factors could cause that trajectory to change This engine will make API calls to SEC, FRED, BLS, CME Fedwatch tool, Individual company’s IR page, and various news sources such as Reuters, Bloomberg to fetch live data that feeds into the Narrative engines. Any thoughts on this?

Soger91

Lmao you're a radiology resident and you think the tech is garbage? You can scream and deny all you want, AI radiology tools are being rolled out into production at hospitals regardless. AI CXR reporting, AI CT head reporting for stroke patients. The stroke physicians love it because it means getting woken up at 3am they don't even need to engage their brains anymore, just check their phone for the image highlights with *no* radiologist input and decide on thrombolysis or no thrombolysis. And even in my own field, were seeing AI rolled out for lesion detection during endoscopy. Yes, Fuji has a terrible stack with false positives all over the screen, but plenty of other companies have excellent polyp detection tech. I've no idea why you think sticking your head in the sand is a valid path forward. I don't think radiologists are going to lose their jobs (and definitely not IR), but just claiming "the tech is bad, it'd unusable" doesn't change the fact that we are using it.

imustbegthequestion

IR3N ceasefire rejected. To the midterms we go... TALLYHO!

gzolax

sniff that IR

elatedplum

Question on the basics - the article says the 2 year note is the “most sensitive” to expected IR changes. But aren’t longer duration bonds more sensitive to interest rates?

C2theC

Yeah, we’re all looking at the same data, and the heads of IR can only pitch you so much. There’s only a few conclusions to be drawn and no one is willing to stick their neck out at the moment to try to break through that massive call wall at 1000. Maybe next monthly OPEX, maybe.

imustbegthequestion

Have you met Mossad? Trick question… YES YOU HAVE AMD YOU NEVER KNEW. OMAN FUCKED UPM HOW ELSE DON’T THE HOUTHIS INVADE THEIR IMPERIALIST COLONIZER AZZES. IR3N. LORDT HAVE MERCY YOU DUMB REGARDS.

Valkyrie_Skuld

Move him to the IR spot or drop him and pick someone from the waver wire

PapaCharlie9

LEAPS is an acronym, like IRS. LEAPs is not the plural of LEAP, just like IRS is not the plural of IR.

MarthaJulietta

The condo next door to me is for sale again- Sold in Jan 21 for 195k. HOA was $350, Interest rates 3% Now listed for 250k w/ HOA at 800 and IR at 6.7% I wanna buy it but Jesus Christ the the monthly payment has gone from ~1400 to ~2200. With the 10yr screaming off the launch pad I dont know if I should wait or if I'm being penny smart and dollar foolish

CollegeSorry5923

Do y'all think the IR3n w4R and 9/11 [#NvRForgetxSentinelS555.00.pp] ate relatable for trading stocks. It is 1st September of 2026... 25... Years... So.... 🙄

Le7emesens

You're right, i think it's not going to end well, problem is what events will trigger the de-QE that's been going on for decades... Glacier melting flooding nyc? IR skyrocketing? Another Covid? US defaulting on its bonds...

sigmaluckynine

1) If you're talking about adopting legal code and writing system, guess with that logic China is just a vassal state of the global West. Considering the Chinese uses a legal system that's similar to the West and uses Pinyin. See the ridiculousness of that statement? Also, Koreans do use English heavily - as for adoption of Chinese, you do realize it's only the literary elites that learned how to read/write Chinese. That was the whole reason for Hangul 2) You still haven't said much about if Yuan and Qing were Chinese. And yes, I did use them on purpose to poke on a sensitive topic considering you seem like one of those crazy far right Chinese nationalists. Even if they adopted the legal code, it still wasn't Chinese. The Yuan dynasty was very Mongolic and as for the Qing, you forgot about the queue. 3) The Nazis didn't admire the US for colonialism you idiot. They admired the US for racism. About the Philippines, that again isn't colonialism. America exercises a very different form of imperialism. It's neither good or bad, it just is. It'd be like when people say China is exercising colonialism in Africa - that's a ridiculous statement. It is imperialism however. Also, your bit about mocking countries as a vassal state - you do not even understand what a vassal state is, how would you mock a country when you literally don't even understand what that means. This is so frustrating because you say these things and I'm sure you think it sounds clever, but it's not. It's actually really stupid. 4) The US hasn't done anything even remotely close to thr Philippines for close to a century. Again, most of America's imperialism is based on gun boat diplomacy and they're really good at it. Venezuela is as close as it gets and why I mentioned it's the first crack in the American system - it's incompatible to how they built their system and if they don't resolve it, it's going to create a wedge. As far as American capabilities diminishing, you have to understand that it's based on a relative. The American economy is still a gigantic apparatus. Their military is still the largest. And they do have an extensive network that they can rely on. The problem is Trump - we'll have to see what happens in the next 2 years and even the mid terms but you're talking about a relative decline. Not terminal. As far as the IR bit, it's not an appeal to authority. It is an appeal that you are out of your depth. You bring up Dunning Kreuger but you don't seem to understand this point about the whole research - the people that falls within that range are people that doesn't know enough about the subject that they're overally confident. That's you. You keep bringing up points that are infantile and frankly stupid. If you've had formal education on it you'd realize your arguments doesn't make any sense - like the whole colonialism bit

imustbegthequestion

https://preview.redd.it/fvnlokdicjmh1.jpeg?width=1206&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=36fc1165b56a1b5b8e0fff888b5da882b382a32b Bring all Michael's home Pedro. IR3N is obliterated

agent00F

1) Korea like many others in the region adopted the *literal* Tang legal code bureaucracy architecture philosophy etc, ie. totality of culture. Korea never remotely adopted literal english etc. 2) The cultural mass of the CN civilization is exactly why those "foreigners" still used chinese legal code etc etc, and even spoke chinese. Not even the commies were able to succeed w/ the cultural revolution to change its basic nature, eg. the imperial exam is still around in the gaokao. 3) The US was so successful at colonialism that nazi germany literally used it as the model for their own expansion. Philippines is a pristine example of colonization, with obedience even decades after the US kicked them to the curb. But really "colony" is being used loosely here to mock the vassals, but you knew that. 4) The reason venezuala (or iraq etc) can't be the success that philippines was is US state capacity has massively diminished from its height. Its deep state is now filled with people of your level with obvious consequences, which is very much worth pondering over. Speaking of which, don't you find it a bit amusing pretending to know history cus you "studied IR" like that's supposed to impressive people who don't know it's parody level propaganda? Which is again the very problem the empire faces in its late stage.

imustbegthequestion

She is a TREAT TAR HEEL PRICELESS FIRM GEM. RESPECT HER RIFFS AND BLITHERIMGS. IR3N, I'M COMING FOR YOUR KEY. IT'S MUTING MINE BY RIGHT

sigmaluckynine

I find this super ironic that you keep going off about Dunning-Kruger and not realizing how much you don't know. I actually formally studied IR. From what you wrote, you haven't and it's glaringly obvious. 1) Korea was not a Chinese state. China, starting from the Ming, built a suzerain system - Korea for all intent and purpose was an independent kingdom but the Ming had a direct influence on the country. This is very much the same as how the US practices and built it's imperial system after Bretton Wood. 2) You're saying how are people oblivious to their own history but you're forgetting that a bulk majority of modern Chinese history is not even Chinese. You have the Yuan dynasty that last for 200 years. Then you have the Qing which last for about 300 years. That's about half of China's recorded history. Which also goes back to the Korea being a Chinese state by choice bit - it was only under Ming. Korea prior was under the Mongols and had a close kin relationship, even the Liangdong area were under a Korean administration leading up to the Ming rebellion. Before that, you had the 3 states period that actively fought against the Tang and Sui, specifically Goguryeo. After Ming, the Qing had to force the Koreans back into the Suzerian system through war. You're saying stuff about history but you don't even know basic regional history. 3) US is not a colonial empire. You do not seem to understand what colonialism means. Even if we apply the usage to not mean settler colonialism it's still not colonialism. Again, they've built the American empire that mirrors heavily on how the Chinese built their empire - it's a suzerian system. That's, again, also why it's possible for China to try to get S. Korea and a lot of other Asian states to jump ships into a Chinese system. It's, again, why the Chinese appealed to pan-Asianism a couple of years ago about this. The US also knows that. On the flip side if the US tries to move towards a formal colonial system it would destroy their own international order. That's why Venezuela was such a disaster - it's the first shot to slowly destroy the current international order on top of the other compounding forces accelerating the process. But sure, go off about Dunning Krueger. Bet you don't even know anything about the actual study

imustbegthequestion

Rwanda better beware. I conquered China, Russia, IR3N, ARGENTINA AND MEXICO. THE AFRICAN UNION PUNISHES OUR OWN BEFORE WE SURRENDER TO THE HAGUE. MUGABE NKRUMAH FOR DINNER? I'M FEELING LIKE GROUNDHOGS SOUP

Capital-Pineapple961

But it also depends. Can US sell the new bonds at lower interest rates? If they can sell, they can use the money to buy back higher IR bonds

torokunai

starlink has 40 subpanels in the folding array collecting ~1kW, so spitballing it, they need to add 40 1kW IR radiators on the other side.

torokunai

it's operating in a vacuum-sealed environment like being in a big Thermos, so has to shed heat via IR EM emission. Basically for every 600W solar panel facing the sun they need a 600W light bulb pointing the other way.

Felixdaga1

The agents generate a rating and rationale. I then transform rating to holdings. You can see their outputs here: [https://www.fintel.capital/strategy](https://www.fintel.capital/strategy) All the tools are point-in-time controlled by the platform, so if model does a web search or price call it can only access data up to the backtest date. All its prompts fed by the platform are also controlled so it will only see "Evaluate this stock...etc". That said it could still have look ahead bias from training knowledge, aka which company became the winner. For longer backtests I just factor it by discounting some of the performance and focus on the iterative impact - e.g. if I swap a model how do the metrics change, what inherent factor bias it has. I then run backtests after the model knowledge cut-off (model I'm using was May 2025 cut off) where even the model does not know wt would happen after. That said, across the pre- and post-cut off tests I ran the performance (IR) and characteristics are very similar. And I separately had agents checking the pre cut off decisions and saw no sign of knowledge leakage; When there are tools and data the model can rely upon it rarely defaults to training knowledge. \^ this is how I validate/evaluate my agents. I iterate the loop to improve. If you want even deeper look of why I landed on the agent architecture (why openclaw is shit for investment) read this [https://felixdaga.github.io/Optimized\_Agent/posts/2026-07-16-optimizing-ai-agents-for-alpha-generation/](https://felixdaga.github.io/Optimized_Agent/posts/2026-07-16-optimizing-ai-agents-for-alpha-generation/)

longGERN

My broker sent me a trade confirmation. I believe that came directly instructed from Amazon IR

Ok_Function2282

You should be going to the company's IR pages shortly before earning season starts, they will have a date announced that you can put in your calendar if you care that much.  But following earnings shouldn't have anything to do with your immediate investing decisions. Earnings are a 3-month, trailing representation of the business, with a little bit of (non guaranteed) guidance sprinkled in. You don't want to be buying or selling based on an earnings call.

wentzco

Excellent Read - August 2026 Investor Presentation - [https://s23.q4cdn.com/291493418/files/doc\_presentations/2026/08/Vireo-Q2-IR-Deck\_FINAL.pdf](https://s23.q4cdn.com/291493418/files/doc_presentations/2026/08/Vireo-Q2-IR-Deck_FINAL.pdf) Same store sales increased 7% YOY in Q2 2026 given integration and optimization efforts - that's huge. In Q2, Vireo eclipsed a billion dollar run rate in a proforma basis. On a sequential proforma basis, revenue per share was up 23%. I get a strong feeling that acquisitions will be speeding up even faster than the pace they are on. They almost are literally saying that. It isn't slowing down for sure. Personally I think Marimed will be their next acquisition though definitely many more private companies will be scooped up as consolidation fills in the map.

KirbyQK

Literally the only problem is making them cheap enough to launch that the economics are better than building data centres here on Earth. All the problems described in this thread are extremely easy to solve with existing technologies. You send them up in very small modular units. You put solar panels on the sun side, and a regular old radiator of the same size as your power capacity on the space side to radiate the heat as IR. If the unit fails, you de-orbit it, it's just one in a giant swarm of processors. But it will just take a very, very long time to make them cheap enough to launch into space. The per KG price would need to be drastically lower than even projected at the moment. In an idyllic society we'd regulate the fuck out of data centres using up all our power, water and polluting our environment with contaminants and noise, to the point that it was actually cheaper to build them in space. But we won't get there for a decade or two at the earliest I'd say.

SnooWalruses3471

This is why you read the 10-Q instead of the transcript. Earnings calls are IR scripted, footnotes aren't. Nice breakdown, appreciate someone actually going line by line instead of just parroting the 'AI supercycle' narrative.

Substantial-Writer58

I think they have a pretty good idea what to do with collectibles. I invite you to visit the IR Page (https://investor.gamestop.com/news-releases/default.aspx) and have a look at the last few quarter reports

LandCruiser76

Hi there CFD Specialist who focusses on thermal simulations- Not space based but I have several peers who do orbital trajectory, satellite thermal management systems, and satellite refuling. But doing View Factors and radiation simulation is a part of my job. Black body radiation is the primary method for cooling in space. You can move the energy around the satellite easily but releasing the energy as IR radiation is about as good as it gets. Its a dog shit way to do it, but its what we've got since you need to get rid of the energy. On earth you use conduction, and take hot metal, and cool it by making hot air, or liquid, or a giant block of metal that you have to let cool off later. But in space there is NOTHING. There is no way to transfer the energy easily. Lets use your logic here. ISS is about 120kw (averaged) a Data center that turns a profit is about 10MW. (about 9880kw more) Using your 800kg rad needs to be about 84 bigger to keep up with the just the power usage adjustment. It costs about 3k usd per kilo to put it in orbit. So about 202,000,000 bucks for shipping the radiator to orbit. Now stack that with the cost of the chips, the fact that there is no way to service them, the coms and telemetry, the solar panels, and it get more insane. And by then the usable service life for a data center is like under 5 years before its obsolete. There are currently data centers that aren't even done yet, getting full re designs to meet the new compute requirements. Is it technically plausible- yes. Is it efficient - no. Is it cost effective- no Will it yield any result in the next 5 years- no.

Loose-Dream7901

It’s almost as if you can call IR mixed with reading and actually get fluid conversations. Conjecture would infer this was not done soundlyx

PapaCharlie9

Sorry, LEAPs is a pet peeve of mine. CSPs and CCs are meant to be the plurals of CSP and CC, respectively. One CC, two CCs. LEAPS is **not** the plural of LEAP. LEAPS is an acronym, like IRS. You don't have one IR, two IRS, and you don't have one LEAP and two LEAPS. If you want to form the plural, have LEAPS modify the thing you want many of, like one LEAPS call, two LEAPS calls.

lk1191

this is wsb, we don't like to hear dirty words like macro issues IR fundamentals. go hard or go home

TechTuna1200

Reddit IR were handing out “bag holder” carabiner clips not that long ago [https://www.reddit.com/r/redditstock/comments/1vb4gx6/just\_received\_this\_in\_the\_mail\_lmao/](https://www.reddit.com/r/redditstock/comments/1vb4gx6/just_received_this_in_the_mail_lmao/)

DumbComment101

Reddit IR was literally giving out branded “bag holder” carabiner clips in the past two weeks leading up to this earnings. It’s all the DD I need. Imagine giving out thousands of these only to post terrible earnings and make the “bag holder” meme come to life. That would be some 3D galaxy brain chess. They are going to smash and I’m extremely confident in the thesis above being more important than any deep dive you could do right now. I’m dead serious.

Purple-Commission861

Where are people seeing SK missed? Not even on their IR page

Mammoth-Cry8936

The thing that helped me most was separating "keeping up" from "deep dives," because they're different jobs and trying to do both every day is why you fall behind. For keeping up, the trick is fewer sources, not more. I stopped grazing Yahoo/Google News because the signal to noise is brutal and you end up reading the same wire story reworded five times. One good morning newsletter that filters for you beats skimming ten tabs. Morning Brew for breadth, or something narrower if you want depth. For the deep dives, don't do them live. Earnings calls aren't a "catch up before work" thing. I let the quarter happen, then on a weekend I'll pull the actual press release and the transcript for the 2-3 companies I actually care about. Reading the release yourself once is worth more than ten hot takes about it. Transcripts are on the IR site or Seeking Alpha, and honestly reading the CFO's guidance language directly tells you more than any article. Also... this forum plus finance Twitter for the pulse, but treat Twitter as a lead generator, not a source. See something, go verify it at the primary.

touuuuhhhny

u/rddt_IR with the clearest case of signalling since the SEC introduced rules to prevent signalling.

RedPlumpTomato

My AI Slop Analysis: AMFN -- HARD AVOID One-liner verdict HARD AVOID. American Fusion Inc. is a 26-year-old shell corpse that got Weekend at Bernie's'd into a fusion energy concept in March 2026, slapped a ticker change on it, and is now trading at half a billion dollars in market cap on ninety-nine thousand dollars in actual cash -- enough to cover their operating burn for about 22 days before somebody has to print more shares and start the whole sorry dilution treadmill over again. --- Three names, zero businesses, one very tired shell. This company was born in the nineties as Tech Laboratories Inc. and proceeded to accomplish absolutely fuck-all for a quarter century before becoming Renewal Fuels Inc. -- another concept that dissolved into the OTC ether -- before finally landing its third identity as American Fusion Inc. in March 2026, roughly 72 hours after completing a reverse merger with a private entity called Kepler Fusion Technologies on February 27. That reverse merger is where a pre-revenue helium-3 fusion concept called Texatron got stapled to a zombie ticker and handed a nearly three-billion-share float, which is not how legitimately transformative fusion energy companies typically launch themselves into the world. The management team assembled to steward this corporate rebranding was not some seasoned deep-tech VC consortium flush with strategic capital. It was one guy holding every C-suite title simultaneously -- CEO, President, Secretary, Treasurer, AND Director, a full royal flush of corporate governance in a single pair of hands -- who has not spent a single goddamn dollar of his own cash buying open-market shares in over two years of running this company. A Costello-shaped hole in the cap table. The share count story for AMFN is genuinely unhinged, and you need to understand it before you think about touching this ticker. The 10-Q for Q1 2026 shows 2,997,301,029 shares issued and outstanding on the balance sheet as of March 31 -- call it roughly three billion shares -- which at the current price of $0.1671 makes the market cap approximately $500.8 million. That alone should give you pause. But Note 10 of the same filing discloses a subsequent event that is wild even by OTC pink-sheet standards: a court-ordered cancellation of 1,683,000,000 shares tied to a dispute involving Justin Costello, the prior RNWF-era operator who pleaded guilty in January 2023 to federal securities fraud for running a $35 million pump-and-dump scheme -- posing as a Harvard MBA billionaire war veteran to systematically defraud retail investors across a web of OTC shells. A federal court nuked 1.683 billion of his shares. By the May 20, 2026 filing date, the cover-page share count had dropped to 1,636,801,029. But here is the part that tells you exactly what kind of operation you are looking at: between the court cancellation and that cover-page date, the current management had already issued approximately 322 million fresh new shares. The court blew up a billion and a half Costello ghost shares, and the new team's immediate institutional response was to dilute right back up. This is not an accident. This is the whole business model. Twenty-two days of runway and a share printer. At March 31, 2026, American Fusion had $99,594 in the bank. Their Q1 operating cash outflow was $415,931. Their net loss for the quarter was $669,750 -- more than six times what they lost in Q1 the prior year -- because now they carry public-company overhead: patent filings, IR marketing, compensation, and a physicist on salary developing technology that has produced zero prototype test results, zero third-party validation, and zero published test data. That $99k is not a strategic reserve. It is a rounding error with delusions of grandeur. The only reason this company breathes as a going concern is that they raised $513,000 in Q1 through unregistered stock sales, and a May 6, 2026 8-K shows they were back at the trough immediately with a new material agreement AND a dilution event in the same filing. Add up what the market is actually buying: roughly $500.8 million in market cap, plus $491K in debt, minus $99K in cash, gives you an enterprise value of approximately $501.2 million for a company with no revenue, no prototype, and 22 days of runway. The CTO has real credentials, a real plasma physics career, and a published theory about nuclear war on Mars. Dr. John E. Brandenburg holds a legitimate PhD from UC Davis, spent real time at Lawrence Livermore and Sandia National Laboratories, carried Top Secret clearances, and built a decades-long plasma physics career. He is also publicly and on-the-record the author of a theory that ancient nuclear weapons annihilated a Martian civilization. He presented at a Fermilab conference on July 23, 2026 -- a real venue -- and American Fusion's own accompanying press release felt morally obligated to include the sentence that participation "does not constitute scientific validation or endorsement of the technology." When your own promotional material preemptively disclaims scientific endorsement for the thing you are promoting, you have reached an entirely new tier of accidental corporate honesty. The Texatron concept is an idea wearing a patent portfolio as a costume, and ideas in patent-portfolio costumes do not deserve half-billion-dollar market caps at development stage. The catalysts have already fired, and you are standing behind the confetti. The July 23 Fermilab presentation and the Texas Tech Testing referenced in the concurrent news release were the freshest catalysts in this story -- and the market had already taken the stock on a nearly 60% single-day rip to approximately $0.20 on July 21 before handing back about 16.5% to settle at current levels. That move is done. If you are looking at AMFN right now thinking you are getting in front of a catalyst, you are literally standing behind the curtain trying to catch confetti after the party ended. There are no upcoming binary events on the calendar -- no dated readouts, no FDA gates, no earnings inflection, nothing concrete on the horizon. You are post-pump and post-peak, sitting at the part of the chart where early buyers are deciding whether to hand their bags to you (3/3) One hundred and sixty-seven thousand percent, and the crowd already did its job. The stock's 52-week low is $0.0001. At $0.1671 today, that is a 167,000% move -- a number so cosmically stupid it wraps back around to being clarifying about what this thing actually is. Penny-stock communities have been flooded with explicitly promotional language around AMFN, breathless comparisons to legitimately funded private fusion companies that have nothing substantive to do with this ticker, and the classic "you still have time to get in" energy that means, with zero ambiguity, that someone who got in cheaper wants you to fund their exit. A sentiment alert on this name fired in mid-July at $0.079, and the stock subsequently peaked at approximately $0.20 -- a 153% move from that alert price. That move is in the books. There is not a single institutional shareholder in this company. Not one fund has touched it. The people who got paid on AMFN got in at sub-pennies, and the only remaining question is who writes their exit check. VERDICT: HARD AVOID. American Fusion Inc. is a zombie shell with three names and zero businesses that stuffed a physics concept with no test results into a nearly three-billion-share float, handed it to a one-man management operation that hasn't spent a cent of its own cash on the stock it runs, carries the legacy of a convicted federal fraudster baked into its corporate DNA, has 22 days of cash left as of its last filing, and is valued at north of half a billion dollars on the strength of promotional press releases and a retail crowd that already ran it 167,000% from the 52-week low. The pump is done. The catalysts have fired. There is no fundamental thesis here. Stay far the fuck away. .

GPUssydestroyer

IR prob, XR doesn’t decrease my app

bakedscallop

[https://www.skhynix.com/ir/UI-FR-IR06/](https://www.skhynix.com/ir/UI-FR-IR06/) Based on the official website, isn't the ER due on 29 July instead?

Advanced_Divide_4641

IR calls for earnings? 8/21 90C 95C? IV is low.

CMTTrader

Netflix IR website -> Financials tab isn't even working. Whole page for Earnings is blank/buffering lmao. What a shit company

ihopethisworksfornow

Just got out of a preliminary meeting with a team who wants “a database” for one of their initiatives. Head of IR says whatever we make needs to be scalable to all clients not just their group. Ok, bigger lift but that’s normal stuff. In the meeting, asking about data sources. What exists where is it, etc. one of these people starts saying they were thinking of using google sheets to track the data. I need to get out of here man.

EmbarrassedPart1256

I saw a post last night on **$ITP** where someone (likely one of the largest, if not *the* largest shareholders) was actively communicating with IR regarding their earnings report filing. Jus the fact that there's actually someone to respond to the emails is enough to make me raise my eyebrows. It's pretty close to as low as it's been & there isn't that far to go before it gets to $0.00. I loaded up on it. I'm also holding **$NIXX** & **$CAPS** FWIW, chilling, not tryin to time the market for now as I keep losing that way.

AfterbanggFN

Lottery numbers are pretty insane actually, leading defense platform in NATO in 10 years time? Contracts with the us selling MAMC containers. Subsea energy transfer and the potential future of charging satellites from earth doubling their lifespan with technology that’s surpasses any of the big names because of the blue laser wavelengths capabilities over IR. I mean there’s a lottery ticket bull case where this is a 50+b market cap company in 10-15 years, no question. But realistically a shorter term, 1-3 year jump up to a 5b market cap is looking extremely realistic. Currently sitting at a market cap of approximately 38m.

JohnKeyDonkey

And Golden Dome!!!! (Even though they have no working product and no EO/IR capabilities)

ImpressionAny1078

honestly the best free approach is just following the IR pages and earnings calendars for the upstream suppliers/partners. for MU specifically you'd want ASML, TSM, SKH on your watchlist since their results move the whole memory space. google finance and seeking alpha both let you set up watchlists with news alerts. subreddit alerts (via reddit or third party) for the main tickers help too. takes like 30 mins to set up and you stop relying on luck. But if you are lazy and want all catalysts at one place chack my bio i have built a tool just for that, i hope mods wont take me behind the barn for the plug :D

steady_compounder

The boring answer is you need a repeatable watchlist process, not a magic feed. Earnings calendars, company IR pages, a few industry sources and alerts for the names you actually own will get you most of the way there. If you try to monitor every second-order catalyst for every adjacent company, you will drown in noise pretty fast.

AdDapper5909

They'll likely beam it via IR radiation. You do realize this problem is already partially solved via SpaceX satellites, right? What a circlejerk of Elon hate lmao.

Lori-Lightfoot

IR's attacks are all intercepted/hit nothing/no casualties or launched at empty US bases, bullish

MitchCurry

EDGAR, IR pages, and my brokerage. I like to make money so I invest for the long-term rather than trade. 

jason_abacabb

The heat is a huge issue, but solvable with bunch of heat pumps and IR radiators. The real issue is the second one. It will always be cheaper to build terrestrial and power it here than lift it into space.

maciekzprawej

2G Energy AG (ticker 2GB) - energy solutions: gas engines+cooling (high energy efficiency), currently more available then gas turbines. Silimiar to INIO (on Nasdaq since June 2026, already +12,4%). They've just received first big orders from data centers (new orders in 1H26 +260% yoy); they say new orders in 2026 should amount to 725 mEUR (66% of market cap). 21x EV/EBITDA in 2026, net cash, 10% EBIT margin. You can read analysts' reports on their IR page [Analyst reports and studies | Investor Relations | 2G Energy](https://2-g.com/en/investor-relations/analyst-coverage)

SirMcWaffel

That’s factually incorrect. The money spent on space exploration is 100% spent on people and companies on earth. A huge amount of technology that is being developed as part of space projects ends up in everyday household items that benefit everyone. That being said, unless space becomes a self-sustaining economic force, it’s not worth investing a penny on the stock market, because nearly all money comes from government contracts. You’re better off investing in companies who use the spin-off technologies and market that towards products for terrestrial use. Some examples: CMOS sensors, IR thermometers, LASIK, Cochlear implants, aircraft anti-icing systems, earth observation for agriculture and land surveying, solar panels, GPS, dry lubricants, gold plating…

PKLeor

Mattel IR, hire this Redditor pls

ChokaMoka1

VOO and chill as much as you can: Roth, IRÁ, Brokerage. 

GallopingIdiot

https://www.reddit.com/r/SipsTea/s/IR8A8b84uu This is who is in charge of the people making stock price targets. You can make it too.

EmbarrassedPart1256

I can't believe I'm saying this but I think I'm gonna load 100 shares of $CTM to DCA, set & forget type of thing. [They recently PR'ed](https://investors.castellumus.com/news/news-details/2026/Castellum-to-Present-at-Maxim-Group-Defense-Tech-and-Domestic-Supply-Chain-Virtual-Conference-on-June-25/default.aspx) that they're going to a Maxim pump & dump defense conference. The two typos at the front & center of [their IR page](https://investors.castellumus.com/overview/default.aspx) still blow my mind... "Our unique capabilities...***give us unique capabilities*** to ***DELIVERY*** comprehensive solutions?" https://preview.redd.it/mdkekghuh79h1.png?width=1812&format=png&auto=webp&s=96c8a22836d24c4e235ad5c35020f84647cea9a6

Background_Basil_431

Otis is no longer the largest vertical transport company in the world. Kone has purchased TKE, and will surpass both Otis and Schindler in size. Add to that, Otis equipment is the worst of the big companies by far, has the worst technology, and customers utterly hate them. They just lost a sure fire win at Marina Bay Sands IR2 project as well.

PapaCharlie9

LEAPS is not the plural of LEAP. LEAPS is an acronym, like IRS. You don't say one IR agent, two IRS agents, right? Same with LEAPS. No, it is not better risk/reward than just owning stock. The only advantage a LEAPS call has is leverage, and since you are going deep ITM, you are giving up most of that advantage, while keep all the disadvantages: time decay, expiration date, inability to add-on or risk-off a few shares at a time, can't DCA, don't collect dividends, etc.

iHateThisPlaceSoBad

Many like it https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/s/IR1SvRqvO3

EmbarrassedPart1256

I will not freebase cocaine…I won’t do it! Going to be traveling today & tomorrow so I may not get much of a chance to trade; I may just load $RDGT & let it cook. Let’s see what I can get into in the PM. https://preview.redd.it/cfzdom34bm7h1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=8d35d8969e0ded969b24fb07b348be98b2d628c4 Peep the $CTM IR homepage; they literally don’t give a fuck. Even though I brought it to their attention, asking them if they’re proud of having this fucked up of an intro. They’ve since changed Tammy’s bio & post news, but yet need a “web overhaul” to fix blatant typos? Asking repeatedly, no one ever told me how these JVs financially affect Castellum, how the money is split. I’d have to see a lot more of those $250M headlines to get excited. That’s potential revenue, likely over 5 years: $250M/2 (assuming the JV is 50/50) is $125M. Assuming a \~10% margin that’s $12.5M, divide by 100M shares that’d be OS with all the employee options & that’s added value of \~$.10-.12/share… in one year. And again, that $250M is the ceiling, not guaranteed.

Maleficent-Row1840

CO2 effects are dwarfed by water vapor. The cloud cover(albedo) and TSI (SWIR) are by far the major driver of terrestrial temps…..not long wave IR backradiation. “Low-level reflective cloud cover has declined by about 1.5% per decade over the last 20 years. This reduction darkens the Earth, allowing more sunlight to reach the surface. This decline acts as a significant positive feedback loop, directly accelerating global warming and contributing to recent record-high temperatures. \[[1](https://www.science.org/content/article/earth-s-clouds-are-shrinking-boosting-global-warming), [2](https://newsbase.com/story/shrinking-cloud-cover-may-be-driving-record-global-temperatures-scientists-warn-368053), [3](https://www.reddit.com/r/climatechange/comments/1h7j823/why_has_it_been_even_hotter_than_expected/), [4](https://www.ehn.org/scientists-link-record-heat-to-declining-cloud-cover), [5](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h8alh8p92is&t=2)\]” Much of the cloudiness decline is due to reduced particulates and natural variability If you studied a bit you would know these things.

LavenderGourami


version-two

I’ve survived more of them than Belushi. He’ll be aight. Source: prescribed 30mg IR addy + 1mg zanny daily

quaintplum

Since when did r/pics become r/gazapics and why are IR and Russian bots so rampant on reddit

Professional-Sell136


sweetplantveal

His pay package is for the trillionaire headline and for the voting shares he 'gets' before he gets them. Never in my life have I heard of voting shares that haven't been awarded. But here we are. I think one of the milestones was a million people on Mars. Even if it's a thousand, how close do you think we are to a mars colony where you live underground in a corporate colony with no chance at a journey home? The other milestone is compute in space. The main waste product is heat. It's f'n hard to radiate heat in space instead of having the sun cook you. You get full radiation but there's nothing conducting heat away. You've gotta do it in IR and that scales on surface area. Size and weight are at a premium in space launches. And the chips have a service life of what, 3-5 years? Data centers in orbit is the stupidest thing I've ever heard of and my buddy working on Artemis agrees. It's about the corporate control and ego. He's not hitting the milestones as written.

RealPennyMuncher

IR ready to bust🟢

four_twenty_4_20

I sent Cresco IR an email the other day. *I was wondering if you could let me know if you're working on plans to separate your medical from rec cannabis business to allow for uplisting as Trulieve recently did.* Their response: *Thanks for reaching out, and for the thoughtful question.*  *To address it directly: a Trulieve-style restructuring is not a comparable path for Cresco. Trulieve's approach deconsolidated its mixed-use operations to leave a medical-only consolidated entity, which fit its predominantly medical revenue base. Cresco's revenue is materially weighted toward adult-use markets, so a medical-only structure would not reflect our business and is not the route we view as appropriate for our footprint.*  *More broadly, we believe the meaningful path to a US national exchange for a company with our profile runs through the federal reform process now underway rather than through a structural carve-out under current exchange rules. We continue to position the business to be ready to access those markets as the regulatory framework evolves, and we will communicate any developments through our public filings and disclosures.* So, not plans to try to uplist in the short term.

RealPennyMuncher

$IR lets goooo 🟢

DA2710

Called the IIPR short here right around 128. Trades at 58 today. Posted the positions along the way. Saw right through the IR fuckery and smoke and mirrors reporting

RealPennyMuncher

CBRE🟢 WFC 🟢 RSG🟢 ABT 🟢 CTAS🟢 IR🟢 MDT🟢 SSNC🟢. Munch munch munch 🦧🍿

Miamiconnectionexo

the thing actually keeping institutions quiet is dilution. sub-$2 biotechs with no revenue fund phase 3 trials by burning cash and selling shares, usually through an ATM or a raise right after good news. before you size anything, pull the latest 10-Q and check cash runway and shares outstanding. alzheimer's has the worst clinical failure rate in the industry, and "3,000 institutions briefed" is an IR talking point, not a position. trade the readout, keep it small, and assume a raise is coming.

volckerwasright

Trulieve Announces Uplist to NYSE $TCNNF $TRUL Soon to be TRLV! https://investors.trulieve.com/2026-06-05-Trulieve-Announces-Uplist-to-NYSE https://x.com/Trulieve_IR/status/2062852328919580967?s=20

EmbarrassedPart1256

$GMEX really is an enigma… 🧐 It’s very scammy in a lot of ways: the phone number on their website is 123-456-7890, someone said their IR email is undeliverable, & the overall sentiment of longs on ST, holding since the last business. There’re old headlines of a class action lawsuit as well. And yet, they’re hella active on LinkedIn.. Why is JPMorgan holding 50K shares?

-Authorised-

Ahahah Godspeed. Fyi the IR firm will be running that not the company. They made the video

RealPennyMuncher

$IR 🟢

TexanBulldog

TACH filed their IR deck. OpenPayd is profitable and the team is finalizing a $100M PIPE. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/2009183/000182912626005925/titanacq_ex99-2.htm

teamtheis50

I'm relative new to this group, so please be easy on me.... Has anyone done research into the importance of Tantalum? Based on my findings, it seems like it will be the most valuable material needed for next-generation integrated photonics and everything involving quantum computing at scale. I've researched and found there is only 1 place in the US where it can be mined, and the publicly traded stock that controls it is USAR. Can anyone verify this and get back to me? Thanks! Summary Material Comparison |**Property \[**[1](https://opg.optica.org/oe/fulltext.cfm?uri=oe-32-7-12291)**,** [2](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340215053_Tantalum_pentoxide_nanophotonic_circuits_for_integrated_quantum_technology)**,** [3](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10800353/)**,** [4](https://preprints.opticaopen.org/articles/preprint/Visible_Integrated_Photonics_with_Tantalum_Pentoxide/30611234)**,** [5](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/394003551_Tantalum_Pentoxide_Integrated_Photonics_A_Promising_Photonic_Platform_for_Third-order_Nonlinearities)**,** [6](https://physicsworld.com/a/tantala-3d-integrated-circuits-deliver-a-rainbow-of-laser-light/)**,** [7](https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acsphotonics.4c01485)**,** [8](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-10379-w)**\]**|**Tantalum Pentoxide (\\(\\text{Ta}\_2\\text{O}\_5\\))**|**Silicon Nitride (\\(\\text{Si}\_3\\text{N}\_4\\))**|**Advantage of Tantalum**| |:-|:-|:-|:-| |**Transparency**|UV to Mid-IR (\\(\\sim \\)300–8000 nm)|Visible to Mid-IR|Superior UV and visible light operations| |**Nonlinear Refractive Index (\\(n\_{2}\\))**|\\(\\sim \\)7.2 to 7.8 \\(\\times \\) \\(10\^{-19}\\) \\(\\text{m}\^2/\\text{W}\\)|\\(\\sim \\)2.4 \\(\\times \\) \\(10\^{-19}\\) \\(\\text{m}\^2/\\text{W}\\)|3x stronger optical light manipulation| |**Thermo-Optic Coefficient**|\\(\\sim \\)2.3 \\(\\times \\) \\(10\^{-6}\\) \\(/\\text{K}\\)|\\(\\sim \\)2.5 \\(\\times \\) \\(10\^{-5}\\) \\(/\\text{K}\\)|10x less drift; far less thermal noise| |**3D Integration**|Deposits at room temp without warping|Requires high-temp processing|Enables damage-free multi-layer 3D chips|

Ok_Support_6454

> [Company] did not immediately respond to [news organization's] request for comments. I love finance journalists. They shoot an email to IR with 'tis true?' 5 minutes before publishing an article.