Reddit Posts
Passive Bitcoin Mining with GoMining (+5% extra TH/s with code)
Perspective: 4 years ago NANO was the same price as today but was sitting on 40th place by marketcap, now is out of top 200
Bore Ape Sons Club | hyper-deflationary token | Big Marketing Campaign | strong community
Whale Number 3 (1P5ZEDWTKTFGxQjZphgWPQUpe554WKDfHQ) has moved its fund to a new wallet (1LQoWist8KkaUXSPKZHNvEyfrEkPHzSsCd). Who owns this wallet??
Tracing Alex Jones's / InfoWars' Bitcoin "donations"
CatBoy | Leading BSC Project | Metaverse | Mystery Box / Booster Pack NFT Staking | Smart Rewards | D.A.O | CZ Follows | CMC & CG Trending
CatBoy | 0% Buy Tax | Leading BSC Project | Metaverse | Mystery Box / Booster Pack NFT Staking | Smart Rewards | D.A.O | CZ Follows | CMC & CG Trending
OUTER RING - New mmo - Tech Demo Ready - Beta ready to JUN/JUL
Mentions
I think I finally got the idea, although I’m not 100% sure I would have found it without the hint about 20 and 26. The first thing that bothered me was the numbers 32, 16, 8, 4, 2 and 1 on the six cards. That can't be accidental. They are exactly the binary weights, and six binary choices give 2⁶ = 64. And there are exactly 64 positions on the 8×8 card. So I started thinking that the six cards are really just six switches. For every number from 1 to 64, we can record whether it appears on each card or not. That gives a unique six-bit code for every number. Then the hint about 20 and 26 suddenly becomes interesting. Apparently, apart from the 8-card, 20 and 26 behave the same way. But if they were also the same on the 8-card, they would have exactly the same six-card code. That can't happen, because every number has to have a different combination. So 20 and 26 MUST be opposite on the 8-card. That looks like the first little piece of the whole construction — basically an initial condition from which the rest can be worked out. Then there is the 180° rotation. At first I thought that was just a theatrical part of the trick, but it seems to be another clue. A card is either flipped or not flipped, so again we have a binary operation. When I think about combining those independent binary states, XOR starts to make sense. So the magician isn't really doing arithmetic with the number the volunteer is thinking of. He is decoding the six yes/no answers. The Franklin square is what makes this much more constrained. Its 2×2 sums and broken-diagonal sums give enough relationships between the positions that the card distributions can't be arbitrary. The resulting construction can be described with fixed XOR values: 32 → 26 16 → 22 8 → 10 4 → 36 2 → 43 1 → 63 Once the magician knows which cards contain the chosen number, he just combines the corresponding values using XOR (with the fixed offset). And now the original 38 trick makes much more sense. The volunteer says, “I can't find this number.” That means the number is absent from all six cards. In binary language, that is simply 0. There is only ONE such combination out of the 64 possibilities. So the magician doesn't need to see the cards at all. He knows exactly which position that combination corresponds to, and in this particular Franklin-square arrangement that position contains 38. That's the part I really like about the puzzle: the magician isn't somehow guessing 38. The information has already been encoded before the performance even starts. The two things that finally made it click for me were: First, 32-16-8-4-2-1 immediately screams “six binary bits”, and six bits giving exactly 64 possibilities can't really be a coincidence. Second, the 20/26 clue tells us that this isn't just a generic binary-card trick. Their forced difference on the 8-card gives an initial condition, and the Franklin-square constraints then pin down the rest of the construction. So I think the real secret is the combination of binary encoding + the special Franklin-square constraints + XOR. And the magician's “38” is just the most amusing example because the volunteer accidentally gives him the easiest possible code: all six bits are zero. If iam correct: 1GajcPPZYUCeCV8LQ126qM1iJjBYEFpf1g
I think I finally see the trick. At first I thought the answer was simply that “not found on any card” means 000000, so there is only one possible position and that position happens to contain 38. But that isn't enough, because the magician has to be able to do this for ANY combination of the six cards. The first important clue is the six card values: 32, 16, 8, 4, 2, 1 These are binary weights. Six yes/no answers give exactly 2^6 = 64 different combinations, which matches the 64 cells of the 8×8 front card. So each number from 1 to 64 has its own six-bit pattern depending on which cards it appears on. The second clue, for me, is the 180° rotation. Rotating a card swaps the holes and non-holes, which is basically a binary toggle. That points naturally toward XOR rather than ordinary addition. The front Franklin square isn't just a random magic square. Its numbers can be generated from the six binary choices by an XOR rule. Using the cards on which the number DOES appear, the magician can calculate: N = 1 + (37 XOR K32 XOR K16 XOR K8 XOR K4 XOR K2 XOR K1) where you only include the K for a card if the number appears on that card. The six fixed keys are: 32 → 26 16 → 22 8 → 10 4 → 36 2 → 43 1 → 63 So, for example, if the volunteer says the number appears on the 32-, 8-, and 1-cards, the magician does: 37 XOR 26 XOR 10 XOR 63 = 10 and then adds 1: 10 + 1 = 11. So the number would be 11. The famous 38 case is just the special case where the number appears on none of the six cards. Then all six cards are in the “absent” state. Using the equivalent absent-card version: N = 1 + (19 XOR 26 XOR 22 XOR 10 XOR 36 XOR 43 XOR 63) which gives: N = 38. So the magician doesn't actually need to see the seventh card or know the numbers printed on it. The six yes/no answers are enough because they form a 6-bit code, and the Franklin square has been constructed so that this code is an XOR/linear mapping to the final number. The two things that led me there were: 1. Six cards with weights 32,16,8,4,2,1 obviously give 64 binary states. 2. The 180° flipping is a strong hint toward XOR: each card is basically one independent binary toggle, and XOR is exactly the operation for combining independent on/off bits without carries. I also think the 8, 9, 6, 4 and 8964 clues are deliberate. The whole puzzle seems to be built around 8964 / June 4, 1989, which explains the final political message as well. So the real “magic” is not guessing 38. The magic is that the six perforated cards encode a 6-bit state, and the Franklin square is an XOR-based mapping of those 64 states to the numbers 1–64. (If you think iam correct so let me have it 🤲 1GajcPPZYUCeCV8LQ126qM1iJjBYEFpf1g
I think the trick is basically a binary coding system. The six cards have 32, 16, 8, 4, 2 and 1 holes. That immediately made me think of binary, because these are the six powers of 2: 32 + 16 + 8 + 4 + 2 + 1 = 63 With six cards, each card can be either turned or not turned, so there are 2^6 = 64 possible combinations. That's exactly the number of positions on an 8×8 card. So the six cards aren't really telling the magician the number directly. They are giving a 6-bit code which points to one of the 64 positions on the seventh card. In the example, the 32, 16, 8 and 2 cards are turned, while the 4 and 1 cards aren't. That gives 32 + 16 + 8 + 2 = 58 and therefore the complementary value is 64 - 58 = 6. The back of the seventh card has 6 at that position, while the front has 9, so the answer is 9. The interesting part is the second number. The magician is behind the partition and sees absolutely nothing. The volunteer says, "I can't find this number." That means the number is not present on ANY of the six cards. In binary terms, all six bits are therefore 0: 0. There is only one such combination. So the magician already knows exactly which of the 64 positions on the seventh card corresponds to it. In the particular arrangement used in the trick, that position contains 38. So he can simply call out "38" without seeing any cards. The two things that gave it away to me were: 1. The numbers 32, 16, 8, 4, 2, 1 are obviously binary weights, and six binary choices give exactly 64 possibilities. 2. The sentence "I can't find this number" is actually information. It means none of the six cards contains it, which is the unique 000000 combination. Therefore the magician doesn't need to see the cards at all. I also think the 8×8 Franklin square and the 8964 clue are extra layers of the puzzle. The Franklin square gives the 64 positions a very distinctive arrangement, while 8964 is clearly meant to point toward the June 4, 1989 Tiananmen Square event. So the magic isn't really supernatural at all. The information has already been encoded into the six cards and the fixed arrangement of the seventh card. The magician only has to recognize the code. if iam correct then 🤲 1GajcPPZYUCeCV8LQ126qM1iJjBYEFpf1g
Solution to the 0.008964 BTC puzzle The trick is a 6-bit encoding disguised as six perforated cards. The six cards are labelled: 32, 16, 8, 4, 2, 1 For any number from 1–64, each card answers a yes/no question: does that number appear through the holes on this card? Six binary answers give exactly: 2⁶ = 64 possible states So every number from 1 to 64 can have its own unique six-card pattern. The clever part is that the mapping can be expressed with XOR. Using the cards that contain the number, the solution is: N = 1 + (37 XOR K₃₂ XOR K₁₆ XOR K₈ XOR K₄ XOR K₂ XOR K₁) where the keys are: - 32 → 26 - 16 → 22 - 8 → 10 - 4 → 36 - 2 → 43 - 1 → 63 Only include the keys for cards on which the number appears. Example If the number appears on cards 32, 8 and 1: 37 XOR 26 XOR 10 XOR 63 = 10 Then: 10 + 1 = 11 Therefore the hidden number is 11. The famous “38” moment The volunteer says: «“I can't find this number!”» That means the number appears on none of the six cards. So all six cards are absent. Using the equivalent absent-card formulation: N = 1 + (19 XOR 26 XOR 22 XOR 10 XOR 36 XOR 43 XOR 63) Calculate: 19 XOR 26 = 9 9 XOR 22 = 31 31 XOR 10 = 21 21 XOR 36 = 49 49 XOR 43 = 26 26 XOR 63 = 37 37 + 1 = 38 So the magician can immediately say 38. There is no supernatural guessing: “I can't find it on any card” gives the magician the unique all-zero 6-bit state, and that state maps to 38. The seventh card / Franklin magic square provides the physical presentation of the mapping, while the six cards provide the binary information. So the core mechanism is: 6 binary cards → 64 states → XOR mapping → one unique number (1–64). That explains how the magician can determine the number without seeing the cards. 1GajcPPZYUCeCV8LQ126qM1iJjBYEFpf1g
They all have longs I’m sure and they just added more not to be LQ
If you had used Ada for what it is for, instead of just buying some and waiting blindly forever, you would have earned a lot. Loot at LQ, SNEK, BODEGA, FLOW, STRIKE projects (and tokens)
What’s that meme: [https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTYQRlp02m6JRx5GtvwBCBzfsj3dO7Exre6LQ&s](https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTYQRlp02m6JRx5GtvwBCBzfsj3dO7Exre6LQ&s)
What's happened to SUI? Looks like they rushed their tech..🙄 https://x.com/RoundtableSpace/status/1884492498665361759?t=5wvHJwNi3jqlG2Qlnhn5LQ&s=19
SUI hacked lol.. https://x.com/RoundtableSpace/status/1884492498665361759?t=5wvHJwNi3jqlG2Qlnhn5LQ&s=19
https://youtu.be/mScpHTIi-kM?si=LQ5IxaF3ek4Ag6ye
On the move right now so I don’t have time to give a breakdown. Here are the projects I’m stacking : IAGON (IAG), liqwid finance (LQ), LENDFI (LENDFI), minswap (MIN), dexhunter (HUNT)— and Snek, but this is a memecoin
I think the market makers will like the idea. The herd will buy then they sweep LQ before they can actually take it up.
Look at [Taptools.io](http://Taptools.io), basically CMC but for ADA Eco-System. Last year alone plenty of 10x plus opportunities. We are starting to see inflow of ADA back into the ecosystem. Borrow and Lending is what is booming right now and DeFi should be next. Some recommendations would be, LENFI, LQ, BTN, HUNT, MILK, SNEK, IAG, INDY
>I do not believe private blockchains or DLTs will overcome the efficiencies of a centralised trusted solution Yawn. So youre just in denial then? [https://youtu.be/PrWQ9OBYrxA?si=gYjPuV-bS8LQ6IzI&t=350](https://youtu.be/PrWQ9OBYrxA?si=gYjPuV-bS8LQ6IzI&t=350) > I googled the transaction thing. Couldnt find jack [https://risk.lexisnexis.com/about-us/press-room/press-release/20210714-true-cost-of-failed-payments](https://risk.lexisnexis.com/about-us/press-room/press-release/20210714-true-cost-of-failed-payments)
The stock-to-flow hopium model: https://x.com/100trillionUSD/status/1816773896198119872?t=vHfs3xJn6iYOzc-apdf-LQ&s=19
> For one thing, you didn't have PoS for the longest time. First let's be clear that this is Ethereum, not "you". Second, PoS in Ethereum's form did not exist before. Third, Upgrading Ethereum while it's running without downtime is a much more difficult task than launching from scratch. > Even now, when you do technically have it, it's still not ideal b/c you have to give custody of your coins to an SPO; this defeats the whole point of self-custody. I have no idea what an SPO is, but it doesn't really matter because you can self custody and stake yourself as a solo validator. If you want to move goal posts and say "but muh 32 eth", you can still use a liquid staking token which is also self custody. > With Cardano, you can stake your coins and receive interest every epoch (5 days) without giving up custody. You keep custody but you are delegating because cardano is delegated proof of stake, which centralizes the chain. > More than that, you can't scale on L1 to more than 20-30 TPS or whatever the rate is for ETH L1; Yes, when you want to keep the chain decentralized and not make it dPoS (see above) this becomes a challenge. This isn't 2017 anymore though, L2s are here to stay and a proven path forward for scaling. > with Cardano, you can theoretically and practically scale on L1. It appears everything with cardano is theoretical > Like I said in my top-level comment, you can send multiple different assets to multiple different receivers with the same transaction. That's great because otherwise you'd need to wait to do another transaction since CH thought it was a great idea to use UTXOs > For example, I can send ADA to Friend A, LQ to Friend B, and SNEK to Friend C all in one transaction. Good luck finding 3 friends that are willing to use cardano
For one thing, you didn't have PoS for the longest time. Even now, when you do technically have it, it's still not ideal b/c you have to give custody of your coins to an SPO; this defeats the whole point of self-custody. With Cardano, you can stake your coins and receive interest every epoch (5 days) without giving up custody. More than that, you can't scale on L1 to more than 20-30 TPS or whatever the rate is for ETH L1; with Cardano, you can theoretically and practically scale on L1. Like I said in my top-level comment, you can send multiple different assets to multiple different receivers with the same transaction. For example, I can send ADA to Friend A, LQ to Friend B, and SNEK to Friend C all in one transaction. Finally, with ETH, there's no secure way to upgrade the chain, which is why all these changes usually take years. With Cardano, we change shit all the time without breaking the security model; it's possible b/c governance is built in.
Cardano isn't "under 100 TPS" in the same way that ETH L1 might be (it was 20-30 TPS last I checked); a sender can send many, potentially hundreds or thousands, of different assets to different receivers in one transaction on Cardano, which they very much can't do on Ethereum. Example: I can send ADA, LQ (governance token for Liquid lending protocol), and SNEK (memecoin) all in one transaction, along with hundreds or thousands of other Cardano-native assets, but it would take me hundreds or thousands of transactions to send all those assets on Ethereum. Cardano has more like 500 TPS ON AVERAGE as of last year once you factor that in (probably could handle a lot more), but scalability has improved a lot since then. This explanation is completely wrong. Cardano obviously doesn't store every UTXO in memory; it uses a SQL database that gets persisted to disk (e.g., SSD). The reason for the minimum UTXO amount, like another commenter said, is to keep an attacker from spamming the network with many tiny UTXOs containing dust. The minimum UTXO amount is now set at 1-1.5 ADA, but it can be changed as a governance parameter whenever the holders want; they just pass it through their governance system, which was meticulously designed so this kinda stuff could be changed. Go watch some YouTube videos or something with an actual open mind instead of spewing this brain-dead bullshit to get upvoted by other toxic ETHbros
Buying depends on your location. There are a lot of cold wallet options that will be recommended. Check this very informative site from James Lopp https://www.lopp.net/bitcoin-information/recommended-wallets.html Personally, I use a coldcard, and I highly recommend it. Here is a longer tutorial from BTC Sessions, but V very thorough. https://youtu.be/FAYmE5-40PQ?si=k08h1LQ1cIoKg4NH
Ahhh better then taking out 50k and losing 99% of it like I have this season and then lost 20k in my own personal money (not to leverage), but I own a house that I should be able to take equity out of it and then loosen the repayments. In the last bullrun lost 8k on leveraging oil fucked up a paten and LQ myself stupid me, so I’ve never touched them again and never will, we’ll if you can you’ll have to get a second job tell your family and just smash it out with down payments as much as you can to pay it back faster.
It was at 200k MC & 18k LQ just a few hours ago & growing 🚀
>Took my ADA and invested it in Cardano Native Tokens.. AGIX up 320% last 30 days, WMT up 80% last 30 days Iagon up 80% last 30 days, NuNet up 122% last 30 days, OrcFact up 30% last 30 days, LQ up 30% last 30 days, COPI up 40%.... Bravo!!!
I went against the naysayers.. invested in CKB and COTI since I was holding ADA. Both up 300-400% 🤷♂️ Took my ADA and invested it in Cardano Native Tokens.. AGIX up 320% last 30 days, WMT up 80% last 30 days Iagon up 80% last 30 days, NuNet up 122% last 30 days, OrcFact up 30% last 30 days, LQ up 30% last 30 days, COPI up 40%....
I moved BTC from Coinbase to Ledger over the weekend for the first time. I did some smaller transfers first to be sure before moving larger amounts. It worked well. I even helped a friend do the same. Please enter your seed phrase here and I can help you too! (KIDDING!) I used this video as a guide. It was helpful, and it feels great to have BTC in the vault! https://youtu.be/9skbU7ICKjY?si=O6leloyp5LQ14_wD
Do not sell until you meet your objectives (which should be far away still imo). NFA though lol. If you want to gamble away, do it without selling, I mean, if you have some to spare right now. Maybe buy some Cardano native tokens, they are prime to explode in the bull (search about NEWM, WMT, LQ...)
Yeah I dont fuck around with SUNDAE/HUSKY/LQ or any of that silliness. I was part of the LQ airdrop and sold it all immediately for $18k. I rather just hold my ADA and keep it staked while auto purchasing more every week.
Got only 28$ worth of LQ,but gonna be fun to see how it gonna increase now. Maybe withing 5 years it's 50 $
Diversify with LQ, Noot, and ADA.
Song feels appropriate https://youtu.be/TP8NoCcf1LQ?si=y5dX_ktuif91gjHj
Apparently it was originally added in August. Was just noticed yesterday. https://twitter.com/tier10k/status/1716957293936533549?t=zuyOOmA4mzvk_BQsTuK9LQ&s=19
Yeah, some of us have/had some serious bags. Now not so much. And as usual I've never "cashed" anything out. Only provided LQ. Even threw some money into moons, because I believed in this community, but reddit said, noooo
The dream. Stacking up untill I can put it into LQ, take the fees/interest from that, and use that as an extra income/ reinvest into other projects
Links to the Wagmi twitter, proposal + Kava and Kinetix Twitter accounts [https://twitter.com/danielesesta/status/1705232879180042291?s=46&t=\_2814NM9YpC9Uc\_sxeP-LQ](https://twitter.com/danielesesta/status/1705232879180042291?s=46&t=_2814NM9YpC9Uc_sxeP-LQ) [https://forum.wagmi.com/t/rfc-1-proposal-for-wagmi-dao-and-kava-partnership/12](https://forum.wagmi.com/t/rfc-1-proposal-for-wagmi-dao-and-kava-partnership/12) [https://twitter.com/KAVA\_CHAIN](https://twitter.com/KAVA_CHAIN) [https://twitter.com/KinetixFi](https://twitter.com/KinetixFi)
Then you put everything into LQ, and live your best life
Is there any big brain out there, that could answer a question ? Just read about that 20+ mill phishing on this sub. And though about extra security measures. Let's say I have one software wallet and one hardware wallet. Sw is interacting,staking, liquidity providing,etc . Hw is clean, never interacting with dexes. If sw is providing LQ, you get LQ tokens. Can you send those tokens to your hw and just leave them be there until you wanna "cash" out. And when "cash" out, you send LQ tokens to your sw. Then do the actions needed. (Sw use dex, send tokens to hw, hw sends back, sw uses) . My question is. If using a sw to interact with dexes. And hw to store those tokens. Is it impossible for someone to drain hw? Since it never do anything besides basic transactions from and to your own wallets.
Question. Short: can you transfer liquidity tokens to a hardware wallet? Hi I'm stupid, Ive been wondering, since we heard about people getting their wallet drained because of x. So I've been thinking, couldn't you use a software wallet, provide liquidity, and then send LQ tokens to the hardware wallet, making it impossible for it to "unstake" ? And one just sends LQ token back to a wallet to unstake, when wanted . Or am I overthinking this ?
I agree, I don't feel like most of the discussions in here are LQ either.
Donuts does a similar thing, it costs 250 donuts to make a post and you can recuperate by earning them back in a high quality posts. It does limit the amount of LQ posts so it's not a bad idea. The exact deduction shouldn't be too high though.
Gonna be that stupid one who either looses every seed phrase made, or I'm gonna hold until I die. But I hope I never need to cash out honestly, would be fantastic if I ever got to that point where I could sell 80% of interest gained from staking, delegating, LQ providing and lending. Live of that. But that's an insane wish
Sold minimal amount, buying back slowly. Main strat is whenever we have a new ath, I sell little bit to eth, and put that into LQ.
Both of those sub had nothing but bot and paid shill activity for months and months on end. That 'cult' was fabricated to sucker newbies in to be exit LQ
what's up, folks? one question has been wondered in my mind lately... wen moons' deposit/withdrawal on CDC?  u/fredzoor
 Kraken
Dunno of I have a fell everything price. I'm more hoping to slowly out everything into LQ, and take the profits from that, as cashing out. I understand this will most likely not be the play and definitely not the most profitable "short" term. But if my hopes n dreams comes true, it will be way better to get little over an "infinite" period of time. That "fast" money. //// And if it dies it dies. It's a fun adventure. and I'll stay poor.
wen moons? 
I'm not sure it has already been asked today😶 wen kraken listing moons? wen? 
so.... wen moons? 
I want to always put like 24% of my moons as LQ each month, set and forget type deal!
Except how defillama has chosen to count what is 'tvl' has been entirely subjective. It counts Lido in this case for eth and yet does not count staking under Ourobouros as TVL, nor LQ staking under Liqwid for example. That already would put it at #2 behind Ethereum. But of course, we must paint the narrative
20% is 20% If you only have 100 moons versus 1000 or 10000 moons in the LQ, you'd still be getting a 20% reward. But transaction fees, IL and KM penalties can hit harder, depending on your time in the pool as well. Another factor depends on if you're selling moons for ETH, or providing your already owned ETH for the liquidity pair.
It’s from over leveraging. I had a 5x link perp open and it dropped out of nowhere. My LQ is like $5.80 so Btc would have to go below 25k I’d think. I’m still in the red but not worried cuz I’m not on 25-50-100x
Damn that's amazing to hear. keep on stacking Just wondering. You have around 4k moon now, do you put some into LQ on nova? I would believe for you. Grinding moons and putting 25% into LQ. After a few months you could start getting a few dollars extra every month passively, that don't effect your karma multiplier.
So do you. Keep grinding. Also remember putting less than 25% of total moons earned by distrub. into LQ won't effect your karma multiplier. So you can earn a little moons on the side. (Started myself this distrub)
Whatever the price 0.5 , 1, 2.5, 5, 10, 25, 50$ . I'll put 24.9% of distribution into LQ. No way I'm selling everything . You would be like selling your land when having oil right under.
Yeah, it starts small. Before you know it, you got a big bag of moons. Invest that into LQ, endless stream of money for cocaine.
LQ. Should have dumped all mine before it hit mainnet but I derped there. Was able to dump em all @ 40 ADA each. Got about ~6300 ADA out of it but lesson learned for sure.
Anyone knows at what point it's more worth to have everything into lq vs holding for karma multiplier+ distrub rewards ? I don't get much each cycle, but i think i could get more just having everything inn LQ. Also, isn't there a impermanent loss reward thingy? Does that get effected by karma multiplier ?
that near 100ETH probably wiped out some shitcoin LQ, oof, pays to follow the V man I guess
DJED didn't actually flash crash, CoinGecko has recently added WingRiders as a pricing source and has been reporting the wrong prices for multiple tokens on the dex. You can see the same thing from a similar time period with [iUSD](https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/iusd) and [Liqwid](https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/liqwid-finance). When CoinGecko was reporting that Liqwid (LQ) was around $0.40 on WingRiders, the actual price on WingRiders was just under $10.
Forever long https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TjD4B3Vh9LQ&pp=ygUMZm9yZXZlciBsb25n
Big brain moves right here. I recently just supplied some ada to LQ
MILK, MIN, AADA, WMT. Other notable ones on my list which I haven’t bought into are; LQ, GENS, MELD.
Need LQ to drop mainnet
Yeah right...Anubody that follows that loser that calls himself a whale is a freaking moron. https://twitter.com/saylor/status/1608086703843180544?t=1cMEX3GmpkAlWRsmwwp0LQ&s=19
I’m not familiar with other projects. Chia does go a bit farther than just tokenizing carbon but provides immutable transparent databases. Many companies have gotten behind and announced partnerships with Chia. Below is a recent talk at the Asian climate summit. Chia presents at 12:30. It is a bit dry in my opinion but I would recommend at least looking into the chain if you’re interested in real world uses. I think this one will come through on its promises https://youtu.be/g9m_XL8u9LQ
lame. AI is weak it's rhymes are weak. https://youtu.be/uPfIIn5V_LQ
Looks like you can use trust wallet on the binance chain. It’s just a clone of ethereum so it will give you an idea how it all works. Here’s a video I found that might help https://youtu.be/HWvFF3ZA2LQ
Bryan Miller, FTX General Counsel, former Sullivan & Cromwell Partner with Jay Clayton, former Legal Counsel to Gary Gensler at the CFTC explains at Bitcoin Expo 2022 how what @FTX_Official did a few months later provide government with the ammunition it needs to regulate crypto https://youtu.be/QsEsgwjfNME https://nitter.net/Leerzeit/status/1591554396567080960?t=JQb_xkXsphdweFYe-0o9LQ&s=19
Listen to the man telling us himself. Bryan Miller, FTX General Counsel, former Sullivan & Cromwell Partner with Jay Clayton, former Legal Counsel to Gary Gensler at the CFTC explains at Bitcoin Expo 2022 how what @FTX_Official did a few months later provide government with the ammunition it needs to regulate crypto https://youtu.be/QsEsgwjfNME https://nitter.net/Leerzeit/status/1591554396567080960?t=JQb_xkXsphdweFYe-0o9LQ&s=19
Bryan Miller, FTX General Counsel, former Sullivan & Cromwell Partner with Jay Clayton, former Legal Counsel to Gary Gensler at the CFTC explains at Bitcoin Expo 2022 how what @FTX_Official did a few months later provide government with the ammunition it needs to regulate crypto https://youtu.be/QsEsgwjfNME https://nitter.net/Leerzeit/status/1591554396567080960?t=JQb_xkXsphdweFYe-0o9LQ&s=19
Bryan Miller, FTX General Counsel, former Sullivan & Cromwell Partner with Jay Clayton, former Legal Counsel to Gary Gensler at the CFTC explains at Bitcoin Expo 2022 how what @FTX_Official did a few months later provide government with the ammunition it needs to regulate crypto https://nitter.net/Leerzeit/status/1591554396567080960?t=JQb_xkXsphdweFYe-0o9LQ&s=19
Crypto.com https://twitter.com/whalechart/status/1591187969628856320?s=46&t=aAxwz2FiRnc8d5_Z-KV0LQ
Ask and ye shall receive: https://twitter.com/whalechart/status/1591187969628856320?s=46&t=aAxwz2FiRnc8d5_Z-KV0LQ
I didn’t downvote 1. They present a risk to the network - https://notes.ethereum.org/@djrtwo/risks-of-lsd 2. They are against the ethos of Ethereum and home staking - https://twitter.com/marceaueth/status/1580630154597974016?s=46&t=PMlVJ06JC0g4LQ6mz6ZtMQ 3. They are a rent seeking business that is governed and funded by VCs. They market themselves as decentralised but are anything but.
Here is a [Nitter link](https://nitter.net/marceaueth/status/1580630154597974016?s=46&t=PMlVJ06JC0g4LQ6mz6ZtMQ) for the Twitter thread linked above. Nitter is better for privacy and does not nag you for a login. More information can be found [here](https://nitter.net/about). --- *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoCurrency) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Give Ada time in terms of pos it years ahead of eth and defi has only begun on Cardano. Ada doesn’t have a launched stable coin like eth yet and that’s were most of eth’s value comes from. As soon as more Defi protocols, services and stable coins like Djed you’ll see money flood in to Ada. Cardano’s alt coin are going to pop off next bull run too. Don’t sleep on. Min Milk Meld LQ Wmt Hosky
[Klaus Schwab: We penetrate the cabinets](https://youtu.be/_2IP_LQ4A6A)
[Klaus Schwab: We penetrate the cabinets](https://youtu.be/_2IP_LQ4A6A)
LQ in Q4! So excited. After Vasil -> testnet -> then mainnet. Gunna be awesome.
hardly. it's barely at the start. not even main net yet. will go main net in a couple weeks or so. looking at what LQ did on cardano, AADA could easily X many times from here.
AADA is a native token (DeFi) on Cardano network. [AADA on taptools](https://www.taptools.io/charts?pairID=0be55d262b29f564998ff81efe21bdc0022621c12f15af08d0f2ddb1.39b9b709ac8605fc82116a2efc308181ba297c11950f0f350001e28f0e50868b) [AADA on coinmarket cap.](https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/aada-finance/) Should follow the same trajectory as LQ (another defi token on cardano network).
I've been doing the math too in case AADA hits as high as LQ. if it does, holy crap I'm rich. lol
The real star on Cardano network is AADA. What a rip, but good God, if it follow in LQ's path it has so much higher to go.
DripDropz.io on Cardano is THE faucet to use, letting you withdraw multiple assets at once (thanks to eUTxO) while also accruing compounded rewards if you choose to use the faucet consecutively (once every 5 days). I’ve used it every epoch since it dropped in January this year and have made pretty substantial returns. Example: Liqwid Finance dropped tokens worth around ~80 ADA/LQ into the faucet that could be redeemed for ~5 ADA > turning into around 70 ADA gain for absolutely minimal work. Another example: received ~1000 cNETA tokens that turned into 300 ADA for absolute minimal work / effort on my behalf.
Sleeper along side MILK, LQ, DANA.
TLDR: Collateralized NFT Bond Peer to Peer Lending/borrowing of native tokens on Cardano. Only 29.5M fixed supply of DAO (governance) token (AADA). Yea sure. It's lending/borrowing protocol using smart contracts. Loans are collateralized and generated in the form of an NFT bond. Borrowing and interest for loan can be paid out in native Cardano tokens. To make it easy you want to borrow 1000 ADA, you put 750 AADA as colleterial, pick a time frame (from 1 day out to 1 year max) we'll say 7 days and offer 50 ADA as interest. It's a peer to peer loan, so I come along and accept the loan. Out of my wallet 1000 ADA (plus network fees) goes into the protocol and I receive an NFT bond with the loan details (interest/expiration) and the collateral. You receive 1000 ADA and a redemption NFT bond. Now a couple of things can happen: 1.You pay the loan back in time by providing the initial amount loaned +interest and NFT then you receive your collateral back. 2.You fail to pay the loan back then I as the lender (NFT bond holder) I receive your collateral with the NFT I hold. 3.During that period I decide that I'd rather have my liquidity back, so I sell the debt on the market place to recoup some of the ADA I loaned out and someone else collects the collateral or loan depending on whether or not you pay off the debt (short term I don't see that happening, but longer term loans it's likely). 4.During that period you decide that you will be unable to pay off the loan and in order to recoup some of your collateral you decide to sell that loan on the market, someone picks it up for a percentage then pays off the loan to collect the collateral. So unlike a complete liquidation you're able to recoup some of your loan. Why a loan? Mostly because you don't want to sell your collateral (due to believing it will increase in value over time and/or you don't want a taxable event from the sale, will be really nice when a stable coin comes online). Same goes with you don't want to sell your collateral but would like to farm/LP native tokens in pools. BUT if you don't want to do any of that (which is understandable) AADA is a DAO token with a fixed supply of 29.5M tokens. There is no inflation. The token has voting rights, can be staked or provide LP to receive a portion of the transaction fees. Strategic Partners (funders) and core team only hold 16% of supply. NFT bonds are a first on this chain or any chain. SPECULATION Because of the low supply I expect to see price action similar to LQ (has about a 21M supply, went from value 7ADA per token up to 115ADA before dropping with the rest of the market to the 50s.
Aside from the raspberry pi and storage, it looks like the case is made up of this: [https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07WXK38YM](https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07WXK38YM) with this: [https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B073S3LQ6Q](https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B073S3LQ6Q)
Wow. You are really full of bullshit. Stop spreading FUD. Two things for you: **First thing, about the wallet:** You are talking about his wallet that sent all the funds to Coinbase [https://bitinfocharts.com/bitcoin/address/1P5ZEDWTKTFGxQjZphgWPQUpe554WKDfHQ](https://bitinfocharts.com/bitcoin/address/1P5ZEDWTKTFGxQjZphgWPQUpe554WKDfHQ) And then those funds were inmediately withdrawed to this other new wallet: [https://bitinfocharts.com/bitcoin/address/1LQoWist8KkaUXSPKZHNvEyfrEkPHzSs](https://bitinfocharts.com/bitcoin/address/1LQoWist8KkaUXSPKZHNvEyfrEkPHzSsCd) It doesn't take a master on computer science to follow where the funds ended. So [1LQoWist8KkaUXSPKZHNvEyfrEkPHzSs](https://bitinfocharts.com/bitcoin/address/1LQoWist8KkaUXSPKZHNvEyfrEkPHzSs) is where the funds of [1P5ZEDWTKTFGxQjZphgWPQUpe554WKDfHQ](https://bitinfocharts.com/bitcoin/address/1P5ZEDWTKTFGxQjZphgWPQUpe554WKDfHQ) are now. The owner of 1P5 just moved them to 1LQ **Second thing, about Saylor:** This wallets (1P5 or 1LQ) **are not** Saylor wallets. There is **ZERO** evidence or proof about that. [This wallet is a Coinbase one, and it is for OTC sales. So when you see big movements out, that means OTC funds or companies are buying](https://twitter.com/SUPREMEBAYC/status/1549869852608847874)
Sounds like a good plan! Did you know that if you leverage on cross margin with binance you can DCA 50k or whatever dollar amount you have in at 1x and then extract it your money down to 100x after it gets in the green? When you DCA in that way your chance of LQ is 0 for longs and slim for shorts.