Reddit Posts
The New Crypto Surge: Altcoins and the Rise of KAVA
Little trick before you invest in ALTs
Native USDC and USDT officially launch within the Cosmos ecosystem, helping to alleviate liquidity fragmentation.
What Coins in the Top 200 will decline short term?
Tomorrow is April Fool's Day. Believe nothing and trust no one
Crypto Pairs Trading: Why it's easier and more profitable than what you are doing now
Crypto Pair Trading - Why it's easier and more profitable than what you are doing now
Introducing Kinu: The First Meme Coin with a Buy Bot on the Kava Chain
Would you like to see your portfolio go green (again)?
Earn Free $3 Kava Crypto | KAVA Coinbase Quiz Answers
The ANTI-SHILL post for COSMOS. Why the project could fail, and how the data tells that story.
If You Could Only Buy 1 Alt, What Would it Be? (Birthday Present Advice)
How much inflation is too much when referring to a given crypto?
With the idea of DCA being so well known, why is KAVA not mentioned at all?
I will become the next DeepFuckingValue. An in depth look into where I believe markets are heading. Please feel free to express your opinions and try not to argue <3
Another red crypto Friday. TRX (+25.28%), ANC (+17.27%) and XDC (+6.92%) showed the most active growth this week, and APE (-40.55%), GMT (-37.81%) and KAVA (-28.47%) dropped down more than others. Bitcoin’s price is $35.9k and Ethereum’s one is $2.7k.
Kava Network ($KAVA) Fake announced their partnership with Tesla as an April fools Joke. KAVA has MC of $760M the price jumped from $4.5 to 4.90 and then dropped to $4.40 after people realized it was an April fools joke.
For the Aussies: Coinspot staking added MATIC, ONE, KSM, FLOW, KAVA
Struggling with Cryptocurrency Taxes for FY21
One of the highest APYs in Crypto: KAVA a true hidden gem. Over 200% APY on your assets! NOT an ad and I DO NOT get paid by them, just trying to share an opportunity at growing your wealth.
One of the highest APYs in Crypto: KAVA a true hidden gem. Over 200% APY on your assets.
Buy 1 ETH Stake and spread across across DOT, ADA, KSM and KAVA
Thoughts on staking Dot, SOL, KSM, and Kava?
To the folks who've been in the game for years,
Top 3 financial brands to buy on December 6th: KAVA, POLY and ETN
Interchain staking with cosmos and why you should know about this…
Mentions
How can someone actually buy KAVA...
I think HNT is a scam and KAVA has the absolute worst tokenomics I've ever seen
KAVA has the most insane tokenomics, tenth of it's previous ATH price and it's already at the same mcap
KAVA will have its day soon
Just FOMO in some SOL, CRV, ZEN, STX, LINK and KAVA. To the moon
Mostly Cosmos assets. In order of bag size: OSMO ATOM DYDX TIA INJ KAVA
Not that I'm aware of. Do you have any other Cosmos assets? You can swap something for KAVA on Osmosis Zone.
Are there any KAVA faucets? I need a mere penny’s worth to unstake
I've noticed the same trends. I plan to increase my holdings in DUA, HBAR, and KAVA before the anticipated bullrun, as we expect more huge gains in the upcoming season. Just waiting for the right time.
My thoughts? You don't want to hear them. ha! I think I may be lost here. I need some advice on how to get my crypto to finish its journey to my wallet. I sent from KUCOIN to EXODUS using something called KAVA and now they tell me that my wallet doesn't use KAVA? My deposit is stuck on the chain(?) in a KAVA wallet.
#Cosmos Con-Arguments Below is a Cosmos con-argument written by gnarley_quinn. > > THE ANTI-SHILL FOR COSMOS: > INFLATION - Much too high. Staking rewards do not offset the supply increase. > There is a significant discrepancy between the inflation calculated by Messari and CoinMarketCap versus the stated inflation from the various Cosmos ecosystem scanners. > Whether it is because of some hidden lock mechanic for some tokens, and since these values are suppose to represent the circulating supply, it is not a good look for investors to have to justify why the stated inflation does not match the calculated one. > The staking rewards are averaged at 21.57% which is below the calculated inflation value, but above the stated inflation value. The staking rewards claimed on the COSMOS website also state the average APY is less than ten percent, which is significantly lower than the stated inflation. > There is a different incentive to holding which is airdrops. Depending on snapshots, you could get lucky with an airdrop that goes ballistic. > > > SOURCE INFLATION SUPPLY TODAY SUPPLY LAST YEAR > Messari 26.60 % 286,370,297 226,186,564 > Coinmarketcap 26.66 % 286,370,297 226,127,431 > Mintscan 13.82 % 313,077,417 Not provided > Atomscan 13.82 % Not provided Not provided > Cosmoscan 13.81 % 319,984,721.29 Not provided > UTILITY - Limited use. There is no reason to hold the token other than speculation > There is actually very little utility for the ATOM token. By staking ATOM, you are able to vote in Cosmos Hub governance decisions, but that is about it. There doesn't seem to be much reason to actually hold it other than it might go up or down and thus you could sell it. For context, other projects require their token to be used for fees or NFT sales. According to cryptofees, the COSMOS chain doesn't seem to actually make any money, the projects built on it do - which still doesn't seem to give a reason to hold ATOM. > DAILY ACTIVITY - It is a mystery! > Try as I might, I could not find statistics anywhere about how many addresses are actually being used on the COSMOS chain. To me, this is a massive red flag. I can find transactions on several sites quite easily, but not being able to find statistics showing me the total number of wallets created, and what percentage of them are currently being used seems impossible. This is a massive issue in terms of transparency on the chain. > Transactions > For what its worth, the average transactions seems fairly consistent, but until I can see the number of wallets that are active, I have no way of knowing if any of these are real users, bots, or just staking rewards. > MARKETCAP DOMINANCE - Falling all year > Obviously the entire crypto asset class is down this year, but if you compare like for like, you can still get a sense of whether the token is holding up well or not. > The marketcap dominance for COSMOS is roughly half of what it was at the beginning of the year. Reaching a top of around 0.6 % of the Crypto market in February, it now sits at 0.3 %. All altcoins will lose dominance in a bear market, but you would want the crypto to hold its own in the class as much as possible. Dropping 50% is not a good thing. > The dominance picked up prior to the announcement of 2.0, but has since fallen away again. > Marketcap dominance > TOTAL VALUE LOCKED - Where is it? > This value helps understand how many people are staking COSMOS and in a sense how commited investors are to the project. Yet once again this is a figure that is difficult to ascertain. > According to DefiLlama, there is no reported TVL directly for the ATOM token. Once again, they list all the projects built on top of the blockchain. The bonded tokens provided on mintscan also seem to correlate to this value. The highest individual TVL seems to CRONOS or KAVA, but I personally dont believe the locked tokens on an individual project on a blockchain should count towards the TVL on another chain. This is not necessarily a bad thing about the TVL for the ecosystem, but it begs the question again, what is the point of holding the ATOM token? > DECENTRALISATION - Some validators have too much control of the network > There are currently \~175 validators which is gives a Nakamoto Co-efficient of just 7. This is roughly the same level of decentralisation as Binance and is a terrible score. COSMOS really needs to increase the numbers of validators quickly because the distribution of tokens across the staking validators is a significant risk. > Nakamoto Coefficient > BIGGEST COMPETITION - Polkadot still higher in most cases > All cryptos are essentially in some sort of competition with each other. Due to the rationale, goals and purpose the blockchain, the biggest competitor to COSMOS is likely POLKADOT. > Again, the crypto asset class is down, by comparing marketcap dominance, Polkadot is still more than double the marketcap of COSMOS. > While Polkadot actually has about half the number of validators as COSMOS, the staking mechanism results in a much better Nakamoto-Coefficient of 85. This means Polkadot is 12 times more decentralised than Cosmos. > \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\* > CONCLUSION: > Holding the ATOM token is pretty much only for speculation - you may get some free stuff or see the price rise. > TLDR: Just read the bold headlines ***** Would you like to learn more? Check out the [Cointest archive](/r/CointestOfficial/wiki/cointest_archive#wiki_Cosmos) to find submissions for other topics.
I love memecoins but this coming year I only have my eyes on KAVA
\>"becoming one of the leading chains alongside Ethereum, Solana, and Cardano in the DeFi space" I think you forgot the KAVA Blockchain that also leads the defi space
If this is true, I would only need a $KAVA big pump.
I hope that among those altcoins you have some KAVA, answering your question, I would only be attentive to the perfect moment to exit since it is difficult to predict when the bull run will peak
It won't be long before FOMO starts and this plus the resurrection of DeFi makes KAVA a good target to keep in mind
I'm not going to lie... it's impressive, imo it needs some KAVA to be perfect but the work you did on that sheet is crazy
The crypto that is missing from your list is the project that is leading the world to web3: KAVA You should take a look at the project
We are in a similar situation and I know that you want to play it "safe" by investing only in Bitcoin but there are also a lot of good projects that you can invest in and get better returns such as Ethereum, BNB, Solana, KAVA (One of my favorites) . There are millions of opportunities out there boy
That's me with my humble $100 placed in KAVA (You are seeing the comment of a future millionaire)
If everyone here is fed up with Ethereum's high fees, why don't you simply opt for using another blockchain like KAVA?
Kinetix is a DEX that is part of the KAVA ecosystem (decentralized blockchain that combines the speed and interoperability of Cosmos with the developer power of Ethereum) Although it is a relatively new exchange, I have noticed that they really put effort into providing a quality user experience and I have not had any problems in months as a user, I recommend it.
That's not even enough for a single Bitcoin. If I were you I would diversify my investments buy ETH, KAVA or any crypto worth holding
Everyone says that BTC and ETH How about we talk about other cryptos? Projects like KAVA will have more relevance than they already have in the future Kava will lead the world to WEB3
KAVA is above $0.50 but the price does not matter, what really matters is the quality of the project and KAVA has several interesting proposals
Let's also talk about the good Crypto youtubers Crypto With James is a good channel The first video that YouTube recommended to me about this guy was a KAVA price prediction that seemed quite accurate to me since the project is doing things well. I hope this guy doesn't disappoint me in the future.
#Cosmos Con-Arguments Below is a Cosmos con-argument written by gnarley_quinn. > > THE ANTI-SHILL FOR COSMOS: > INFLATION - Much too high. Staking rewards do not offset the supply increase. > There is a significant discrepancy between the inflation calculated by Messari and CoinMarketCap versus the stated inflation from the various Cosmos ecosystem scanners. > Whether it is because of some hidden lock mechanic for some tokens, and since these values are suppose to represent the circulating supply, it is not a good look for investors to have to justify why the stated inflation does not match the calculated one. > The staking rewards are averaged at 21.57% which is below the calculated inflation value, but above the stated inflation value. The staking rewards claimed on the COSMOS website also state the average APY is less than ten percent, which is significantly lower than the stated inflation. > There is a different incentive to holding which is airdrops. Depending on snapshots, you could get lucky with an airdrop that goes ballistic. > > > SOURCE INFLATION SUPPLY TODAY SUPPLY LAST YEAR > Messari 26.60 % 286,370,297 226,186,564 > Coinmarketcap 26.66 % 286,370,297 226,127,431 > Mintscan 13.82 % 313,077,417 Not provided > Atomscan 13.82 % Not provided Not provided > Cosmoscan 13.81 % 319,984,721.29 Not provided > UTILITY - Limited use. There is no reason to hold the token other than speculation > There is actually very little utility for the ATOM token. By staking ATOM, you are able to vote in Cosmos Hub governance decisions, but that is about it. There doesn't seem to be much reason to actually hold it other than it might go up or down and thus you could sell it. For context, other projects require their token to be used for fees or NFT sales. According to cryptofees, the COSMOS chain doesn't seem to actually make any money, the projects built on it do - which still doesn't seem to give a reason to hold ATOM. > DAILY ACTIVITY - It is a mystery! > Try as I might, I could not find statistics anywhere about how many addresses are actually being used on the COSMOS chain. To me, this is a massive red flag. I can find transactions on several sites quite easily, but not being able to find statistics showing me the total number of wallets created, and what percentage of them are currently being used seems impossible. This is a massive issue in terms of transparency on the chain. > Transactions > For what its worth, the average transactions seems fairly consistent, but until I can see the number of wallets that are active, I have no way of knowing if any of these are real users, bots, or just staking rewards. > MARKETCAP DOMINANCE - Falling all year > Obviously the entire crypto asset class is down this year, but if you compare like for like, you can still get a sense of whether the token is holding up well or not. > The marketcap dominance for COSMOS is roughly half of what it was at the beginning of the year. Reaching a top of around 0.6 % of the Crypto market in February, it now sits at 0.3 %. All altcoins will lose dominance in a bear market, but you would want the crypto to hold its own in the class as much as possible. Dropping 50% is not a good thing. > The dominance picked up prior to the announcement of 2.0, but has since fallen away again. > Marketcap dominance > TOTAL VALUE LOCKED - Where is it? > This value helps understand how many people are staking COSMOS and in a sense how commited investors are to the project. Yet once again this is a figure that is difficult to ascertain. > According to DefiLlama, there is no reported TVL directly for the ATOM token. Once again, they list all the projects built on top of the blockchain. The bonded tokens provided on mintscan also seem to correlate to this value. The highest individual TVL seems to CRONOS or KAVA, but I personally dont believe the locked tokens on an individual project on a blockchain should count towards the TVL on another chain. This is not necessarily a bad thing about the TVL for the ecosystem, but it begs the question again, what is the point of holding the ATOM token? > DECENTRALISATION - Some validators have too much control of the network > There are currently \~175 validators which is gives a Nakamoto Co-efficient of just 7. This is roughly the same level of decentralisation as Binance and is a terrible score. COSMOS really needs to increase the numbers of validators quickly because the distribution of tokens across the staking validators is a significant risk. > Nakamoto Coefficient > BIGGEST COMPETITION - Polkadot still higher in most cases > All cryptos are essentially in some sort of competition with each other. Due to the rationale, goals and purpose the blockchain, the biggest competitor to COSMOS is likely POLKADOT. > Again, the crypto asset class is down, by comparing marketcap dominance, Polkadot is still more than double the marketcap of COSMOS. > While Polkadot actually has about half the number of validators as COSMOS, the staking mechanism results in a much better Nakamoto-Coefficient of 85. This means Polkadot is 12 times more decentralised than Cosmos. > \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\* > CONCLUSION: > Holding the ATOM token is pretty much only for speculation - you may get some free stuff or see the price rise. > TLDR: Just read the bold headlines ***** Would you like to learn more? Check out the [Cointest archive](/r/CointestOfficial/wiki/cointest_archive#wiki_Cosmos) to find submissions for other topics.
For DeFi tokens, I'm holding KAVA and LEVER, patiently waiting for my buy price since I got them at a higher position. My bag also includes other gems, like KREST. I've been following the DePIN narrative, especially with the Peaq network making huge developments, and more builders are joining the network.
MATIC: https://www.np.reddit.com/r/0xPolygon/s/qbPK0kapcU ATOM: https://www.np.reddit.com/r/cosmosnetwork/s/AnKMLRfEdY auto-compound ATOM rewards tutorial: https://www.np.reddit.com/r/cosmosnetwork/s/S9EGykhTz4 KAVA: https://www.np.reddit.com/r/cosmosnetwork/s/1UHEN7sOsU auto-compound KAVA rewards tutorial: https://www.np.reddit.com/r/cosmosnetwork/s/jMNUfVPE7G
Great post! These tips are extremely helpful for successful investments. I also believe in diversification, and currently, I'm holding HBAR, KREST, VET, KAVA, and more. Holding those with solid fundamentals is definitely worthwhile.
I'm betting KAVA will be next to pump. Taking my ETH profits and throwing it into KAVA
I'm going with CELR, KAVA and last bit not least...KDA, very promising
#Cosmos Con-Arguments Below is a Cosmos con-argument written by gnarley_quinn. > > THE ANTI-SHILL FOR COSMOS: > INFLATION - Much too high. Staking rewards do not offset the supply increase. > There is a significant discrepancy between the inflation calculated by Messari and CoinMarketCap versus the stated inflation from the various Cosmos ecosystem scanners. > Whether it is because of some hidden lock mechanic for some tokens, and since these values are suppose to represent the circulating supply, it is not a good look for investors to have to justify why the stated inflation does not match the calculated one. > The staking rewards are averaged at 21.57% which is below the calculated inflation value, but above the stated inflation value. The staking rewards claimed on the COSMOS website also state the average APY is less than ten percent, which is significantly lower than the stated inflation. > There is a different incentive to holding which is airdrops. Depending on snapshots, you could get lucky with an airdrop that goes ballistic. > > > SOURCE INFLATION SUPPLY TODAY SUPPLY LAST YEAR > Messari 26.60 % 286,370,297 226,186,564 > Coinmarketcap 26.66 % 286,370,297 226,127,431 > Mintscan 13.82 % 313,077,417 Not provided > Atomscan 13.82 % Not provided Not provided > Cosmoscan 13.81 % 319,984,721.29 Not provided > UTILITY - Limited use. There is no reason to hold the token other than speculation > There is actually very little utility for the ATOM token. By staking ATOM, you are able to vote in Cosmos Hub governance decisions, but that is about it. There doesn't seem to be much reason to actually hold it other than it might go up or down and thus you could sell it. For context, other projects require their token to be used for fees or NFT sales. According to cryptofees, the COSMOS chain doesn't seem to actually make any money, the projects built on it do - which still doesn't seem to give a reason to hold ATOM. > DAILY ACTIVITY - It is a mystery! > Try as I might, I could not find statistics anywhere about how many addresses are actually being used on the COSMOS chain. To me, this is a massive red flag. I can find transactions on several sites quite easily, but not being able to find statistics showing me the total number of wallets created, and what percentage of them are currently being used seems impossible. This is a massive issue in terms of transparency on the chain. > Transactions > For what its worth, the average transactions seems fairly consistent, but until I can see the number of wallets that are active, I have no way of knowing if any of these are real users, bots, or just staking rewards. > MARKETCAP DOMINANCE - Falling all year > Obviously the entire crypto asset class is down this year, but if you compare like for like, you can still get a sense of whether the token is holding up well or not. > The marketcap dominance for COSMOS is roughly half of what it was at the beginning of the year. Reaching a top of around 0.6 % of the Crypto market in February, it now sits at 0.3 %. All altcoins will lose dominance in a bear market, but you would want the crypto to hold its own in the class as much as possible. Dropping 50% is not a good thing. > The dominance picked up prior to the announcement of 2.0, but has since fallen away again. > Marketcap dominance > TOTAL VALUE LOCKED - Where is it? > This value helps understand how many people are staking COSMOS and in a sense how commited investors are to the project. Yet once again this is a figure that is difficult to ascertain. > According to DefiLlama, there is no reported TVL directly for the ATOM token. Once again, they list all the projects built on top of the blockchain. The bonded tokens provided on mintscan also seem to correlate to this value. The highest individual TVL seems to CRONOS or KAVA, but I personally dont believe the locked tokens on an individual project on a blockchain should count towards the TVL on another chain. This is not necessarily a bad thing about the TVL for the ecosystem, but it begs the question again, what is the point of holding the ATOM token? > DECENTRALISATION - Some validators have too much control of the network > There are currently \~175 validators which is gives a Nakamoto Co-efficient of just 7. This is roughly the same level of decentralisation as Binance and is a terrible score. COSMOS really needs to increase the numbers of validators quickly because the distribution of tokens across the staking validators is a significant risk. > Nakamoto Coefficient > BIGGEST COMPETITION - Polkadot still higher in most cases > All cryptos are essentially in some sort of competition with each other. Due to the rationale, goals and purpose the blockchain, the biggest competitor to COSMOS is likely POLKADOT. > Again, the crypto asset class is down, by comparing marketcap dominance, Polkadot is still more than double the marketcap of COSMOS. > While Polkadot actually has about half the number of validators as COSMOS, the staking mechanism results in a much better Nakamoto-Coefficient of 85. This means Polkadot is 12 times more decentralised than Cosmos. > \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\* > CONCLUSION: > Holding the ATOM token is pretty much only for speculation - you may get some free stuff or see the price rise. > TLDR: Just read the bold headlines ***** Would you like to learn more? Check out the [Cointest archive](/r/CointestOfficial/wiki/cointest_archive#wiki_Cosmos) to find submissions for other topics.
#Cosmos Con-Arguments Below is a Cosmos con-argument written by gnarley_quinn. > > THE ANTI-SHILL FOR COSMOS: > INFLATION - Much too high. Staking rewards do not offset the supply increase. > There is a significant discrepancy between the inflation calculated by Messari and CoinMarketCap versus the stated inflation from the various Cosmos ecosystem scanners. > Whether it is because of some hidden lock mechanic for some tokens, and since these values are suppose to represent the circulating supply, it is not a good look for investors to have to justify why the stated inflation does not match the calculated one. > The staking rewards are averaged at 21.57% which is below the calculated inflation value, but above the stated inflation value. The staking rewards claimed on the COSMOS website also state the average APY is less than ten percent, which is significantly lower than the stated inflation. > There is a different incentive to holding which is airdrops. Depending on snapshots, you could get lucky with an airdrop that goes ballistic. > > > SOURCE INFLATION SUPPLY TODAY SUPPLY LAST YEAR > Messari 26.60 % 286,370,297 226,186,564 > Coinmarketcap 26.66 % 286,370,297 226,127,431 > Mintscan 13.82 % 313,077,417 Not provided > Atomscan 13.82 % Not provided Not provided > Cosmoscan 13.81 % 319,984,721.29 Not provided > UTILITY - Limited use. There is no reason to hold the token other than speculation > There is actually very little utility for the ATOM token. By staking ATOM, you are able to vote in Cosmos Hub governance decisions, but that is about it. There doesn't seem to be much reason to actually hold it other than it might go up or down and thus you could sell it. For context, other projects require their token to be used for fees or NFT sales. According to cryptofees, the COSMOS chain doesn't seem to actually make any money, the projects built on it do - which still doesn't seem to give a reason to hold ATOM. > DAILY ACTIVITY - It is a mystery! > Try as I might, I could not find statistics anywhere about how many addresses are actually being used on the COSMOS chain. To me, this is a massive red flag. I can find transactions on several sites quite easily, but not being able to find statistics showing me the total number of wallets created, and what percentage of them are currently being used seems impossible. This is a massive issue in terms of transparency on the chain. > Transactions > For what its worth, the average transactions seems fairly consistent, but until I can see the number of wallets that are active, I have no way of knowing if any of these are real users, bots, or just staking rewards. > MARKETCAP DOMINANCE - Falling all year > Obviously the entire crypto asset class is down this year, but if you compare like for like, you can still get a sense of whether the token is holding up well or not. > The marketcap dominance for COSMOS is roughly half of what it was at the beginning of the year. Reaching a top of around 0.6 % of the Crypto market in February, it now sits at 0.3 %. All altcoins will lose dominance in a bear market, but you would want the crypto to hold its own in the class as much as possible. Dropping 50% is not a good thing. > The dominance picked up prior to the announcement of 2.0, but has since fallen away again. > Marketcap dominance > TOTAL VALUE LOCKED - Where is it? > This value helps understand how many people are staking COSMOS and in a sense how commited investors are to the project. Yet once again this is a figure that is difficult to ascertain. > According to DefiLlama, there is no reported TVL directly for the ATOM token. Once again, they list all the projects built on top of the blockchain. The bonded tokens provided on mintscan also seem to correlate to this value. The highest individual TVL seems to CRONOS or KAVA, but I personally dont believe the locked tokens on an individual project on a blockchain should count towards the TVL on another chain. This is not necessarily a bad thing about the TVL for the ecosystem, but it begs the question again, what is the point of holding the ATOM token? > DECENTRALISATION - Some validators have too much control of the network > There are currently \~175 validators which is gives a Nakamoto Co-efficient of just 7. This is roughly the same level of decentralisation as Binance and is a terrible score. COSMOS really needs to increase the numbers of validators quickly because the distribution of tokens across the staking validators is a significant risk. > Nakamoto Coefficient > BIGGEST COMPETITION - Polkadot still higher in most cases > All cryptos are essentially in some sort of competition with each other. Due to the rationale, goals and purpose the blockchain, the biggest competitor to COSMOS is likely POLKADOT. > Again, the crypto asset class is down, by comparing marketcap dominance, Polkadot is still more than double the marketcap of COSMOS. > While Polkadot actually has about half the number of validators as COSMOS, the staking mechanism results in a much better Nakamoto-Coefficient of 85. This means Polkadot is 12 times more decentralised than Cosmos. > \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\* > CONCLUSION: > Holding the ATOM token is pretty much only for speculation - you may get some free stuff or see the price rise. > TLDR: Just read the bold headlines ***** Would you like to learn more? Check out the [Cointest archive](/r/CointestOfficial/wiki/cointest_archive#wiki_Cosmos) to find submissions for other topics.
KAVA is part of the ATOM ecosystem. I've started researching it recently and it seems interesting to me.
XLM will do well I reckon, I don't know KAVA
#Cosmos Con-Arguments Below is a Cosmos con-argument written by gnarley_quinn. > > THE ANTI-SHILL FOR COSMOS: > INFLATION - Much too high. Staking rewards do not offset the supply increase. > There is a significant discrepancy between the inflation calculated by Messari and CoinMarketCap versus the stated inflation from the various Cosmos ecosystem scanners. > Whether it is because of some hidden lock mechanic for some tokens, and since these values are suppose to represent the circulating supply, it is not a good look for investors to have to justify why the stated inflation does not match the calculated one. > The staking rewards are averaged at 21.57% which is below the calculated inflation value, but above the stated inflation value. The staking rewards claimed on the COSMOS website also state the average APY is less than ten percent, which is significantly lower than the stated inflation. > There is a different incentive to holding which is airdrops. Depending on snapshots, you could get lucky with an airdrop that goes ballistic. > > > SOURCE INFLATION SUPPLY TODAY SUPPLY LAST YEAR > Messari 26.60 % 286,370,297 226,186,564 > Coinmarketcap 26.66 % 286,370,297 226,127,431 > Mintscan 13.82 % 313,077,417 Not provided > Atomscan 13.82 % Not provided Not provided > Cosmoscan 13.81 % 319,984,721.29 Not provided > UTILITY - Limited use. There is no reason to hold the token other than speculation > There is actually very little utility for the ATOM token. By staking ATOM, you are able to vote in Cosmos Hub governance decisions, but that is about it. There doesn't seem to be much reason to actually hold it other than it might go up or down and thus you could sell it. For context, other projects require their token to be used for fees or NFT sales. According to cryptofees, the COSMOS chain doesn't seem to actually make any money, the projects built on it do - which still doesn't seem to give a reason to hold ATOM. > DAILY ACTIVITY - It is a mystery! > Try as I might, I could not find statistics anywhere about how many addresses are actually being used on the COSMOS chain. To me, this is a massive red flag. I can find transactions on several sites quite easily, but not being able to find statistics showing me the total number of wallets created, and what percentage of them are currently being used seems impossible. This is a massive issue in terms of transparency on the chain. > Transactions > For what its worth, the average transactions seems fairly consistent, but until I can see the number of wallets that are active, I have no way of knowing if any of these are real users, bots, or just staking rewards. > MARKETCAP DOMINANCE - Falling all year > Obviously the entire crypto asset class is down this year, but if you compare like for like, you can still get a sense of whether the token is holding up well or not. > The marketcap dominance for COSMOS is roughly half of what it was at the beginning of the year. Reaching a top of around 0.6 % of the Crypto market in February, it now sits at 0.3 %. All altcoins will lose dominance in a bear market, but you would want the crypto to hold its own in the class as much as possible. Dropping 50% is not a good thing. > The dominance picked up prior to the announcement of 2.0, but has since fallen away again. > Marketcap dominance > TOTAL VALUE LOCKED - Where is it? > This value helps understand how many people are staking COSMOS and in a sense how commited investors are to the project. Yet once again this is a figure that is difficult to ascertain. > According to DefiLlama, there is no reported TVL directly for the ATOM token. Once again, they list all the projects built on top of the blockchain. The bonded tokens provided on mintscan also seem to correlate to this value. The highest individual TVL seems to CRONOS or KAVA, but I personally dont believe the locked tokens on an individual project on a blockchain should count towards the TVL on another chain. This is not necessarily a bad thing about the TVL for the ecosystem, but it begs the question again, what is the point of holding the ATOM token? > DECENTRALISATION - Some validators have too much control of the network > There are currently \~175 validators which is gives a Nakamoto Co-efficient of just 7. This is roughly the same level of decentralisation as Binance and is a terrible score. COSMOS really needs to increase the numbers of validators quickly because the distribution of tokens across the staking validators is a significant risk. > Nakamoto Coefficient > BIGGEST COMPETITION - Polkadot still higher in most cases > All cryptos are essentially in some sort of competition with each other. Due to the rationale, goals and purpose the blockchain, the biggest competitor to COSMOS is likely POLKADOT. > Again, the crypto asset class is down, by comparing marketcap dominance, Polkadot is still more than double the marketcap of COSMOS. > While Polkadot actually has about half the number of validators as COSMOS, the staking mechanism results in a much better Nakamoto-Coefficient of 85. This means Polkadot is 12 times more decentralised than Cosmos. > \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\* > CONCLUSION: > Holding the ATOM token is pretty much only for speculation - you may get some free stuff or see the price rise. > TLDR: Just read the bold headlines ***** Would you like to learn more? Check out the [Cointest archive](/r/CointestOfficial/wiki/cointest_archive#wiki_Cosmos) to find submissions for other topics.
#Cosmos Con-Arguments Below is a Cosmos con-argument written by gnarley_quinn. > > THE ANTI-SHILL FOR COSMOS: > INFLATION - Much too high. Staking rewards do not offset the supply increase. > There is a significant discrepancy between the inflation calculated by Messari and CoinMarketCap versus the stated inflation from the various Cosmos ecosystem scanners. > Whether it is because of some hidden lock mechanic for some tokens, and since these values are suppose to represent the circulating supply, it is not a good look for investors to have to justify why the stated inflation does not match the calculated one. > The staking rewards are averaged at 21.57% which is below the calculated inflation value, but above the stated inflation value. The staking rewards claimed on the COSMOS website also state the average APY is less than ten percent, which is significantly lower than the stated inflation. > There is a different incentive to holding which is airdrops. Depending on snapshots, you could get lucky with an airdrop that goes ballistic. > > > SOURCE INFLATION SUPPLY TODAY SUPPLY LAST YEAR > Messari 26.60 % 286,370,297 226,186,564 > Coinmarketcap 26.66 % 286,370,297 226,127,431 > Mintscan 13.82 % 313,077,417 Not provided > Atomscan 13.82 % Not provided Not provided > Cosmoscan 13.81 % 319,984,721.29 Not provided > UTILITY - Limited use. There is no reason to hold the token other than speculation > There is actually very little utility for the ATOM token. By staking ATOM, you are able to vote in Cosmos Hub governance decisions, but that is about it. There doesn't seem to be much reason to actually hold it other than it might go up or down and thus you could sell it. For context, other projects require their token to be used for fees or NFT sales. According to cryptofees, the COSMOS chain doesn't seem to actually make any money, the projects built on it do - which still doesn't seem to give a reason to hold ATOM. > DAILY ACTIVITY - It is a mystery! > Try as I might, I could not find statistics anywhere about how many addresses are actually being used on the COSMOS chain. To me, this is a massive red flag. I can find transactions on several sites quite easily, but not being able to find statistics showing me the total number of wallets created, and what percentage of them are currently being used seems impossible. This is a massive issue in terms of transparency on the chain. > Transactions > For what its worth, the average transactions seems fairly consistent, but until I can see the number of wallets that are active, I have no way of knowing if any of these are real users, bots, or just staking rewards. > MARKETCAP DOMINANCE - Falling all year > Obviously the entire crypto asset class is down this year, but if you compare like for like, you can still get a sense of whether the token is holding up well or not. > The marketcap dominance for COSMOS is roughly half of what it was at the beginning of the year. Reaching a top of around 0.6 % of the Crypto market in February, it now sits at 0.3 %. All altcoins will lose dominance in a bear market, but you would want the crypto to hold its own in the class as much as possible. Dropping 50% is not a good thing. > The dominance picked up prior to the announcement of 2.0, but has since fallen away again. > Marketcap dominance > TOTAL VALUE LOCKED - Where is it? > This value helps understand how many people are staking COSMOS and in a sense how commited investors are to the project. Yet once again this is a figure that is difficult to ascertain. > According to DefiLlama, there is no reported TVL directly for the ATOM token. Once again, they list all the projects built on top of the blockchain. The bonded tokens provided on mintscan also seem to correlate to this value. The highest individual TVL seems to CRONOS or KAVA, but I personally dont believe the locked tokens on an individual project on a blockchain should count towards the TVL on another chain. This is not necessarily a bad thing about the TVL for the ecosystem, but it begs the question again, what is the point of holding the ATOM token? > DECENTRALISATION - Some validators have too much control of the network > There are currently \~175 validators which is gives a Nakamoto Co-efficient of just 7. This is roughly the same level of decentralisation as Binance and is a terrible score. COSMOS really needs to increase the numbers of validators quickly because the distribution of tokens across the staking validators is a significant risk. > Nakamoto Coefficient > BIGGEST COMPETITION - Polkadot still higher in most cases > All cryptos are essentially in some sort of competition with each other. Due to the rationale, goals and purpose the blockchain, the biggest competitor to COSMOS is likely POLKADOT. > Again, the crypto asset class is down, by comparing marketcap dominance, Polkadot is still more than double the marketcap of COSMOS. > While Polkadot actually has about half the number of validators as COSMOS, the staking mechanism results in a much better Nakamoto-Coefficient of 85. This means Polkadot is 12 times more decentralised than Cosmos. > \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\* > CONCLUSION: > Holding the ATOM token is pretty much only for speculation - you may get some free stuff or see the price rise. > TLDR: Just read the bold headlines ***** Would you like to learn more? Check out the [Cointest archive](/r/CointestOfficial/wiki/cointest_archive#wiki_Cosmos) to find submissions for other topics.
ICX used to be a darling in this sub. And KAVA is in top 100. QNT seems to be a good project. Removing KAVA and QNT is ridiculous.
I still hold some SHIB, but it's not a huge amount. I'm hoping for a recovery in all of my portfolios, not just SHIB, but also my holdings like KAVA and ENJ. I think KREST is one of the few coins that has continued to perform well despite the bear market. I'm glad I took a chance to explore the DePIN narrative, and its EVM compatibility is a valuable addition for building on Peaq.
>70% of my portfolio are Btc and Eth, ​ ​ This is a smart move, though your gains may not be as much compared to your alt coins, but they will be a lot safer. ​ Though I'm with various other alts like XLM, that's facilitating speedy global transactions, Ride, the pioneer in automobile-based blockchain tech, KAVA, for passive income, then there's Itheum, Link, Zpay and BAT in the mix
Links to the Wagmi twitter, proposal + Kava and Kinetix Twitter accounts [https://twitter.com/danielesesta/status/1705232879180042291?s=46&t=\_2814NM9YpC9Uc\_sxeP-LQ](https://twitter.com/danielesesta/status/1705232879180042291?s=46&t=_2814NM9YpC9Uc_sxeP-LQ) [https://forum.wagmi.com/t/rfc-1-proposal-for-wagmi-dao-and-kava-partnership/12](https://forum.wagmi.com/t/rfc-1-proposal-for-wagmi-dao-and-kava-partnership/12) [https://twitter.com/KAVA\_CHAIN](https://twitter.com/KAVA_CHAIN) [https://twitter.com/KinetixFi](https://twitter.com/KinetixFi)
Yeah, I think so too. It's KAVA on CoinGecko.
BTC, DOT, ALGO, KAVA and maybe ADA or XLM.
Don't know about KAVA and CKB but sounds like a good plan
My plan until the distribution of the moons is 70% of my monthly dca in btc. The remaining 30% in DOT, ALGO, KAVA, CKB. After the distribution I will sell 25% of my moons for btc/eth.
My guess is SOL, LTC and KAVA. Maybe LINK too.
KAVA logo is pretty whack too
This week I will buy some DOT, VET, CKB, ALGO and KAVA. Besides btc of course.
This week I will buy DOT, CKB, KAVA and maybe VET or ALGO. When I buy eth I don't take btc, but I do it once every 3-4 months.
ADA, Matic, Algo, XRP, XLM, GRT, Strax, DOT, 1nch, KAVA and some more.
No, because of it's price action. I don't own any KAVA but I'm looking to trade it sometime soon.
KAVA's a strange one. Because of USDT?
I like to add to my portfolio the profits from the coins I stake. Which coins did you invest in to stake for passive income? I don't stake eth (just not sure) but I stake ADA, ALGO, ONE, ZIL, KAVA, XTZ, DOT , CKB, IOTX, CHR. Who are yours?
Yes, ASTR doesn't know anything. What about KAVA.
tldr; Kava Chain, a decentralized Cosmos-Ethereum interoperable Layer 1 blockchain, is now live on Fireblocks, an enterprise platform for managing digital asset operations. The integration will allow Fireblocks customers to safely access the expanding Cosmos DeFi ecosystem via the Kava Chain. This move will enable over 1,800 leading digital asset and crypto institutions to custody KAVA tokens and access Kava-native assets, including Cosmos-native USDt. The integration also provides a more capital-efficient option for cross-chain arbitrage. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR. Try our free crypto chatbot at https://chat.coinfeeds.io*
Sold all my KAVA at $4. Maybe a good moment to buy some coins back.
tldr; Kava Chain, a decentralized Cosmos-Ethereum interoperable Layer 1 blockchain, is now live on Fireblocks, an enterprise platform for managing digital asset operations. The integration will allow Fireblocks customers to safely access the expanding Cosmos DeFi ecosystem via the Kava Chain. This move will enable over 1,800 leading digital asset and crypto institutions to custody KAVA tokens and access Kava-native assets, including Cosmos-native USDt. The integration will also allow Fireblocks customers to engage in DeFi opportunities on platforms within the Kava ecosystem. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR. Try our free crypto chatbot at https://chat.coinfeeds.io*
Just one? Hmmm I'd go for : RIO - RWA DUA - smart wallet KAVA - DeFi lending RNDR- DePIN ETH - blockchain MATIC - layer 2 solutions.
Yes, I don't see staking phasing out in the new future. I have ETH, ATOM, and KAVA staked with plans to stake more in the coming months such as SEI, and Weaver Labs' ADE token when they become available.
USDT should be tradable now on KAVA, however, it will probably be available on Osmosis soon if I had to guess. USDC is not available at the moment, but will hopefully be released on Noble very soon.
Harmony, ICP, IOTA, OSMO, JUNO, GRT, ALGO, EGLD, EOS, KAVA
Those listed above are good coins, however I feel you should also check out some low caps since you are interested in long terms holdings. VRA, RIDE, FLUX, KAVA among others.
Exactly, we are still expecting the bull season, I will like to know those token he has that has been mooning cus my bags aren't and they will when it's bull run, tokens like FLUX, VRA, VR, SYLO, ONT, KAVA.
$KAVA, great APR for staking and attracting DeFi.
It's challenging to predict which coins will experience a 100x increase in value, but considering the current circumstances, it seems unlikely. However, I have diversified my assets and hold high expectations for all of them, including DUA and KAVA. Both projects are solid and possess great potential.
Biggest gainers this week out of the top 100 alt coins: **BCH +76%** **PEPE +64%** BSV +38% KAVA +33% AAVE +32% What the fuck?
At the long run, investing on RWA would mean that your token would be in your wallet pending the time to sell. So staking could be the right option. I believe RWA also have a staking program so you can buy and stake. I have a couple of tokens similar to that, SYLO, KAVA, CRUST CREDIT
Everyone in the crypto space should have BTC and ETH, those two are like the basic to trading, then some low caps long-term tokens, for me, I'm holding SYLO, KAVA, FLUX, ONT and ARPA for a long term.
I would say for the DeFi area and especially for the Cosmos ecosystem, it was Luna. UST was the defacto stablecoin in Cosmos, projects like KAVA and OSMO have not come close to recovering. But UST was also increasingly popular in the rest of the DeFi space. The crash wiped out lots of money in the market. Across the board, I would say FTX was worse.
More reasons to keep DCAing into your bags, holding those tokens with good fundamentals and potentials, I keep DCAing into ARPA, KAVA, SYLO, IMX, and INJ
I will check on this as I am also searching for the next investment opportunity like PEPE, from which I gained profits. I have acquired long-term coins, including MNI, which is backed by real-world assets, thereby enhancing liquidity. Additionally, I have diversified my portfolio and hold KAVA, ETH, MATIC, and ZIL.
I'll try to ride the hype for this when I have extra funds, as I have already invested my memecoin profits into long-term assets like HBAR, MNI, KAVA, ZIL, VET, and many others. How far are you now btw?
24h biggest gains are ARPA, KEY. Biggest dips are KAVA, MULTI (all according to kraken).
my KAVA bag is pumping, any news?
Any thoughts on KAVA rising before i sell :P
There is this Iranian shill with a pretty huge number of followers and whenever he suggests a coin it goes up. He suggested KAVA on May 10.
Why is KAVA rising? Gone up 50% in 2 weeks time. Was gonna sell but had to wait 22 days for the stake to release it..
Can anyone explain wth is going on with KAVA lately ? I can't find any news about it and it looks like strange pump.
I had some KAVA last bullrun, the staking was fun with such a high rewards. But sold it already, any big news out?
I hold KAVA for a long time at different price. This year, I'm including RWA projects as well. One of them is MNI, and I have no doubt that they'll offer solutions for both liquidity and DAO governance. The frequent problems this area has.
I don't even complicate things. Buy the red, sell the green. OCEAN & KAVA still looks good for accumulation. Q3 should be interesting.
**Crypto Forefront 17 May -** \- Binance announces support for Terra Classic (#LUNC) and Kava (#KAVA) network upgrades. \- Court victory for Ripple - Unredacted Hinman emails to be publicly available soon \- Elon Musk says Twitter plans to create a more efficient financial system than traditional banking. \- Bitcoin lightning company River raises $35 million amid "new wave" of institutional adoption \- European Union passes law requiring identification for all crypto transaction \- Polygon zkEVM prints ATH in transactions volume in key performance. \- Terra classic community passes four monumental burn and staking proposals \- Binance has announced the removal of certain trading pairs, which will take effect on May 18,2023. Source - Coinpedia
been diversifying into NEAR, GALA, ANKR, KAVA, LINK, ADA, MATIC, BTC and ETH because i believe we are near the bear market bottom just like 4 years ago. in hindsight 2019 was a good time to buy, expecting 2023 to be the same. lets go December 2023 bull run with ATH peak in 2025.
Only $KAVA and $ARPA showed some strength
That's true, lol. Even though the ROI on memecoins and shitcoins is higher than that of legit coins, I only invest for short-term gain. The wait is worthwhile for real coins like MNI, HBAR, ZIL, and KAVA. Various projects, but with a better future.
KAVA, WOO & LUNC also doing well in the last 24 hours. Not that I'd have any but I thought I point it out since those 3 beat ARB within the top 100.
KAVA, and hell no I don't hold it anymore.
I'll look into these options. Pepe has already brought me money. I'm investing the earnings in long-term projects like MNI as RWA gains traction. Since it is a land-backed asset, liquidity is not a problem at this time. Gotta add my KAVA and ATOM too.
KAVA evm fees are 100x maybe 1000x cheaper. Doesnt mean much.
They had a 3$ one for KAVA only a few months ago and before that 00 Token IIRC
people shilled me NEAR, GALA, KAVA and ANKR. so started DCA on these coins. my mainnstrategy is to buy the daily or weekly red candle, 50% BTC, 50% shilled coins. looking back, 2019 was the time to buy, 4 years later now is the time to buy.
AMP, KAVA, NEAR and BLUR are the ones im thinking of quitting and im tempted to put them into LTC or BTC
You’re very welcome. I’ve been into DeFi for about a year now so I know how hard it can be to get an idea for exactly a “reasonable” staking APY is coming with a real world background where banks feel threatened about exchanges offering 2% on stablecoins. I’m not gonna say to buy anything, but from my experience in DeFi the staking rewards on Cosmos seem to be fairly representative of the range of “hardly even worth it”, to the edge of what I’d even consider touching as far as staking rewards goes. I looked for a current list but couldn’t find anything in a couple mins so I’ll just look at my wallet and list 10 of those for you so you can get an idea: ATOM: 21.96% OSMO: 20.87% CRO: 12.95% JUNO: 31.57% UMEE: 17.05% EVMOS: 82.33% SCRT: 24.24% AKT: 10.53% KAVA: 15.78% INJ: 16.62% Anything in the 3 digits as far as simple staking I consider highly risky. Sometimes you’ll get that high and have it not be sketchy if you get into an LP with fixed rewards early and you’re splitting rewards with like 5 other people before other people come in and the % drops a couple hours later, but also a project listing % returns in days and not annually, that’s a bit of a red flag too. Don’t give up though, when you find a good DeFi platform it’s fantastic, I’d definitely just have a separate exploratory wallet you only keep like $20 in for that, and make sure you manually disconnect from dapps regularly.
some of my list of weird (still not sure what will survive, but I am out of these now: XTZ, FLOW, KLAY, KAVA, RUNE (oh god, runeee), NEM/XEM (got myself bunt there), SXP (did some tiny gains there in 2021), SAMO, GO, SYLO, EXF (lol, a nice dex learn there), BBOO, OCTA, ....
As an investor in DOT and ATOM I concur. Also KSM and KAVA are in my portfolio.