DAILY

Agronopolopogis

There are plenty of legitimate tokens that aren't a scam. It's true though, 99.999999% are, but that's because thousands get minted DAILY. # ***DAILY*** There are plenty of reputable tokens that aren't on this list. # No utility, no value.

Rizzguru

For me personally, I DCA DAILY and accumulate as much as possible as this is just gold but once I reach a number that I don't feel comfortable losing like $500-700 I transfer that amount immediately to my cold wallet, that way there's no risk if the CEX gets fucked, hacked, or the wiseasses decide I'm suddenly a drug kingpin and freeze my funds for no reason. NYKNYC

potts-tots

$RICH. Not the trump related one, the Rich Machine one. 2% DAILY interest for staking SOL. No unstaking period, only a 6% withdrawal fee for taking out your stake. Restaking and taking your gains are free and can be done multiple times a day, as often as you want. Up and running as of yesterday and yes, withdrawing works fine. It falls in the too good to be true category, but the dev team has delivered every step of the way so far. $RICH tanked on release of the rich machine because people started selling for SOL so they can stake it. Team seems to be creating a way to stake $RICH in the near future. After March 22nd, if you havent used the machine yet, it will cost a 1 time fee of 10k $RICH tokens for permanent access. And that 10k gets burned, doesnt go to team. 189m total supply.

kaaasje

Explain your calculations because by year 30 you will be dca’ing 25*365*30=273.750 on a DAILY basis (I’m not considering leap years or your initial $30)

Organic-Ad9474

DAILY $40!? Fuck I’m poor.

BitcoinBanksy

I love that all the comments have been super bearish lately. "*WE'RE GOING TO 70s!*" they scream, an hour before we ascend back up to mid 80s. **STACK SATS DAILY!**

dmx442

Hell no, fuck this ***BEST*** shit, ### Time for the first r/cc REVOLUTION WE WANT ONE THING: ##### DAILY SORTED BY NEW!

Flaky-Rip-1333

Yeah, except its not the bottom of this dip yet and there are still some to come, dude. Look at how many times 100k has been crossed, now imagine you bought each time it was under it. Also, I mentioned DAILY buys, not weekly, because there will always be price fluctuation on the same day, by 1-10%. So yeah, DCA all you want in the way you want, but there are other strategies.

PeterParkerUber

AI is potentially a bubble if it’s overvalued. But I wouldn’t compare it to the Dotcom bubble. Doing so would be an oversimplification of similarities. From what I’ve read, there was pretty much zero demand for any of the websites in the Dotcom bubble. It was pure speculation. The infrastructure didn’t exist yet, internet speeds were shit and people were still on dialup. That’s why it collapsed so badly. I don’t know about you but I’m using AI DAILY. I’m using it EVERY DAY, and I find it incredibly useful. There is a high demand for the actual products/services in AI. It’s only a bubble if valuations start way too far from reality. But it’s not the same as the Dotcom bubble where there was no real use/demand for the proposed products.

jaxsantiago

We are in a DAILY, arent we Bud?

Local_Doubt_4029

It's funny how much hate for President Trump. Biden and Harris did NOTHING for the U.S. and more shit is getting exposed DAILY. BTC is in a better place come Jan. 20th!!!!

Toblakai1979

It's actually been increasing it's usage for the past several years and is one of the few coins being used by companies like Walmart China, UFC, etc. It's DAILY transactions from actual business usage have been between 200k to over 1 million for almost 6 months. 4 years ago it did a 50x during the bull market and looks to be following a similar path this bull run.

Kike328

12M dump in an entire year on a 450.000.000.000$ MCAP… it’s not even the 0.017% of the DAILY volume

Ch40440

And?? There’s $200 Billion or more DAILY volume 🚀🚀🚀📈📈📈

Walter_Melon42

I love that I still don't know this person's actual first name despite seeing DAILY news articles

Actually-Yo-Momma

Homie it has always been this way. Go to the Shib subreddit and you’ll see people DAILY pumping saying shib will go to $1. Just a casual play to have a market cap with all of the worlds money on a meme coin!!

alwaysasking1

Yes, there are high chances, trillions of dollar circulate in globally in Forex alone, DAILY

WeedSexBeerPizza

Plus or minus 15% DAILY was so common back in the day. This ain't shit.

llamasloth007

You need to do more research before investing in a coin. If you put money in. Panic because it dropped and then sell you might as well be gambling because that’s what you are doing. Don’t buy on a Green Day. Buy on red days. And learn how to read the DAILY Charts)not hourly unless you plan to day trade. If you believe in a coin and have done research. Buy and DCA (dollar cost average) if it dips. Buy more. It will lower your average cost down. Most investors don’t make money over night. The PNUT story you read about is not common. It was also bought on an exchange you probably don’t even know how to use or find. Which is ok. Ever heard of a stop loss order? Stop limit order? I was just like you when I first started. FOMO(fear of missing out) got me just like it gets a lot of people. Over time I educated my self and I learned more through trial and error and tons of research. I still have no idea what I’m doing. But I’m more educated and able to make decisions not based on emotion. Been buying a certain coin since 2020. When I bought I was uneducated and it was pretty much bought at its ATH. Kept going down for years and I continued to buy more which is called DCA and I lowered my average cost by a significant amount. And because I did my research. Now that particular coin is doing well and I’m making significant gains. TLDR- educate yourself before investing in crypto.

_TheWolfOfWalmart_

Who cares? Apparently nobody, 18 comments in 3 days. #PIN THE DAILY.

MirrorPiNet

There is only like $3 trillion in all of cryptocurrency. There is $111 trillion in the stock market alone. Maybe the money can go there, it wont even make a difference. The foreign exchange market has about $6 trillion being exchanged DAILY. Soo in the grand scheme of things, crypto is a small market in which 60% of the market is simply bitcoin.

zxr7

Lets make a single DAILY ATH post and post it all within.

Glittering_Bench9726

Kendu is a multifaceted project. Yes it’s a memecoin, but the community has created Kendu energy drinks, coffee, jewelry, marijuana strains, commercials, media content, and many other tangible products. There is so much happening with Kendu DAILY that it’s hard to keep track of everything. Dev is doxxed, contract is renounced, and the chart is pumping while the rest of the market bleeds. Kendu is the greatest memecoin ever created with the strongest community (cult) that DeFi has ever seen!

twitch-switch

DAILY?? Isn't that a nightmare to track?

McTeezy353

This is why you don’t sell your dust and you check DAILY. I too have missed out on 10k from 30$. I cashed out 5k but could have been 15k. I check everyday, the one I mean the one day I didn’t one of my dust coins popped! Keep the faith, you know good memes so hold them!

Icy_Tour1350

For real. I stumbled upon an early X space through a reddit post and have been all in ever since! The DAILY spaces are incredible!

Luccisixx

SNOOFI IS WHAT EVERY DEGEN WANTS : community growing on a DAILY basis (almost 3k now) holder counts grow (6.5k) diamonds hands - twitter chat and reddit chat WE ARE THE CULT WE ARE REDDIT The trenches are a cold place, but with the good allies, nothing is impossible. BELIEVE IN SOMETHING.

Nanaki_TV

You have no idea how government works. The government goons prevented him from building the wall. You remember that right? All while screaming Russia Russia Russia! Meanwhile there’s 50,000 illegals coming in DAILY right NOW! But hur dir wall bad

quiteNotSureWhat

doesn't work, that macro requires extra params, tried this but failed: =GOOGLEFINANCE("BTC-USD","price", "29/07/2024", "30/07/2024", "DAILY")

Extreme_Nectarine_29

A wild *DAILY DISCUSSION* pump appears! What you do?

allstater2007

considering there were 13,000 ETH added DAILY prior to the merge, this is 10 days worth...

Zigxy

Can't really make the Bitcoin->Apple comparison. Bitcoin's value is mostly (entirely?) speculative. Apple on the other hand: - Generates over $1B in sales DAILY - Has net profit of $100B a year - Owns over $350B in assets There is *some* speculation with Apple as its market cap is pricing in some growth, but ultimately, it has so much intrinsic value, that even if a group of whales were to sell massive amounts of AAPL stock tomorrow, the price would never drop beyond a certain point. Conversely, if some whales tried selling 1m BTC, it would absolutely decimate the spot price of bitcoin.

flarept1

> V-FASTTRADE PRO Starter Plan Daily $429 It makes 429$ on a 1000$ Investment. DAILY. BIGGEST SCAM, GET HIM OUT OF THERE

GabeSter

Repinning Daily for a few hours: But you all need to realize there's a lot of ways to find the daily like scrolling hot, or clicking the DAILY Discussion - link in the sidebar: If every person that complained about the daily not being pinned upvoted the daily it would be on the top of Hot.

Holiday-Bat9204

IAM - EARN 2% DAILY AND MORE! Register: https://lam-intrust.com/register?Invitation=371428 Same as DCPTG, but this one is recent. -April 12th was the launch day; -Decent and realistic payouts so it will probably be around for some time; - Low entry investment , minimum 10USDT; - Daily withdraws; Don’t miss out on the opportunity of making some chash while it’s around, probably for the next 8/9 months, then you will probably get scammed. The sooner you register, higher is the probability of making some cash. Register: https://lam-intrust.com/register?Invitation=371428 More Info: https://t.me/WELCOME_TO_IAM

Itchy-File-8205

This dumbass question gets asked DAILY If the world goes to shit you're statistically unlikely to make it a month even with prep. Nothing will matter except your ability to defend yourself and attack others.

ImaginationFlashy290

Honestly, I personally wouldn't recommend trading for complete beginners - unless you have a tech background and experience with stocks/options trading already. if not, you have a lot to learn and will probably lose money at the start (market tuition). it involves high levels of emotional discipline, research and analysis on various different platforms. You will have to develop your own strategy and figure out how to identify trends in the many different sectors. My suggestion: go on youtube and just watch as many videos as you can about crypto, learn market psychology, fundamental analysis and how to read charts. Browse reddit and crypto twitter. if you're serious, you have to be willing to soak up new info DAILY, you have to accept that you will probably lose at first. Least stressful and 'safest' thing to do is buy btc/eth and hold.

LostRedditor5

That’s fucking sad that you have an asset so volatile you feel the need to cost average fucking DAILY and yet still think it’s a good investment lol

_DANGR_

100k CANDLES DAILY. at least that's what that other guy on Reddit said. Would love to see just one though.

bbiittccooiinn

Coingecko is saying 5400 scamcoins are launched DAILY. Coinmarketcap says there are now over 2 MILLION scamcoins. No, your scamcoin isn't special. It still only exists to enrich its developers and fleece you.

vremains

No steam for a new ATH? In case you don't know, the ETFs have been buying up like 4k-10k BTC DAILY. Now, grayscale has been selling about 4k daily, but their going to run out soon. Literally only 900 BTC are mined daily and that's about to go down to 450 in a couple weeks... The demand is going to outweigh the supply by about 10x pretty soon. How much more steam do you need? 😅

walter_h_whiteYO

Uhh yeah plus all kids growing up every year. We will never “have everyone in or out of Bitcoin.” And the USA prints so much mf money DAILY. We won’t run out of money either. This post is ignorant.

Jaxsoy

I mean clearly if I_SNIFF_FARTS_DAILY says it’s over then it’s obviously over

Holiday_Pool_4445

My biggest fear is an H.E.M.P. Otherwise, I am all for it. In fact I earned roughly $1,000 last week and I am learning from daily Zoom meetings how to make it $1,000 DAILY !!!

_TheWolfOfWalmart_

We greatly missed I_SNIFF_FARTS_DAILY

Holiday_Pool_4445

You’re right. I made about $1,200 in BTC recently, but now it’s going to be Etherium where I expect to earn at LEAST $300 DAILY.

Revenge_served_hot

WHY IS THE DAILY NOT PINNED?!?!?! And on this note: Go CRO go! 😎

Canadian_high_ape

Dont get me wrong, im bullish as fuck but.. Descending channel in 4H. Bartley in Weekly. PRZ is between 19 and 36 \+ EMA50 WEEKLY: 33900 EMA200 DAILY: 36815

Itchy-File-8205

I don't mind newcomers but if you don't have ten seconds to Google a question that we get asked multiple times per day, please fuck off until you get a clue. What's the best exchange? Why is my transaction stuck? Quantum computer will send BTC to zero! Why did my trade execute above the listed price? Why are fees so high? How safe is BTC? We get these questions DAILY. And mods are useless so it's all just a bunch of spam. BTC takes WORK to understand. In my eyes, you immediately prove that you lack the drive to 'get it' when your first idea is to waste our time on meaningless drivel

wooly_torch

OMG 😱 WHY AM I POSTING IN DAILY WHEN I COULD BE FLYING MY PERSONAL SPACESHIP 🚀 🚀 🚀 🌙 TO THE ISS TO POP CHAMPAGNE 🥂 🍾 WITH THE ASTRONAUTS 🧑‍🚀 👩‍🚀 Id like to thank everyone for witnessing my rise to financial greatness. I knew when I sold my home and took out all those loans to leverage 1000x, it would pay off. Ride or die, my grandpa would always say - and he was the leader of the Hells Angels 👼 😇 Catch me on the flip side with Elon and Bezos - you’ll be reading me in the newspapers soon when I Count of Monte Cristo my way to the top of the world and enact an elaborate revenge plot against my bitter foes. ✌️

Itchy-File-8205

All of your replies show that you don't know shit about fuck. You're just like the other hundred dumbasses that come around here DAILY thinking they've figured out a flaw in the system. Do some research instead of spamming our sub with your bullshit if you want anyone to take you seriously.

therealsandysan

Holy fuck. This is quoted DAILY at my house. Thank you for the best reference I’ve ever seen here.

fresheneesz

Nah bro, satishi has 1/15th of the total supply, $30 billion worth. The DAILY trading volume is $20 billion. Yes a huge sale of all of it would tank the price, but not anywhere near to 0. It might go down to $1000. Satoshi would be an idiot to sell all of it

RepresentativeSoil44

BTC RECIEVER NEEDED URGENTLY FOR 10000 btc DAILY, ONLY FOR SERIOUS RECIEVER

RepresentativeSoil44

BTC RECIEVER NEEDED URGENTLY FOR 10000 btc DAILY, ONLY FOR SERIOUS RECIEVER

RepresentativeSoil44

BTC RECIEVER NEEDED URGENTLY FOR 10000 btc DAILY, ONLY FOR SERIOUS RECIEVER

RepresentativeSoil44

BTC RECIEVER NEEDED URGENTLY FOR 10000 btc DAILY, ONLY FOR SERIOUS RECIEVER

RepresentativeSoil44

BTC RECIEVER NEEDED URGENTLY FOR 10000 btc DAILY, ONLY FOR SERIOUS RECIEVER

RepresentativeSoil44

BTC RECIEVER NEEDED URGENTLY FOR 10000 btc DAILY, ONLY FOR SERIOUS RECIEVER

RepresentativeSoil44

BTC RECIEVER NEEDED URGENTLY FOR 10000 btc DAILY, ONLY FOR SERIOUS RECIEVER

RepresentativeSoil44

BTC RECIEVER NEEDED URGENTLY FOR 10000 btc DAILY, ONLY FOR SERIOUS RECIEVER

RepresentativeSoil44

BTC RECIEVER NEEDED URGENTLY FOR 10000 btc DAILY, ONLY FOR SERIOUS RECIEVER

OkPerformance642

\^\^\^ That's exactly what they have been doing. Check out DMGI. Grossly undervalued, more than doubling their daily hash rate and banking BTC DAILY! Super low float compared to most of the others ...Sky is the limit fellas! Sit back, load up and ride out the storm.

jfhsdkjfhsdkjfhsdkjf

Use this google sheets function: =1000 / INDEX(GOOGLEFINANCE("CURRENCY:BTCUSD", "close", A1, A2, "DAILY"), 2, 2) 1. Open google sheets 2. put fuction in cell a2 3. put the date you want in cell a1

b1mm3rl1f3

$3k DAILY candle and we haven’t even done anything yet 🤪

CointestMod

#Cosmos Con-Arguments Below is a Cosmos con-argument written by gnarley_quinn. > > THE ANTI-SHILL FOR COSMOS: > INFLATION - Much too high. Staking rewards do not offset the supply increase. > There is a significant discrepancy between the inflation calculated by Messari and CoinMarketCap versus the stated inflation from the various Cosmos ecosystem scanners. > Whether it is because of some hidden lock mechanic for some tokens, and since these values are suppose to represent the circulating supply, it is not a good look for investors to have to justify why the stated inflation does not match the calculated one. > The staking rewards are averaged at 21.57% which is below the calculated inflation value, but above the stated inflation value. The staking rewards claimed on the COSMOS website also state the average APY is less than ten percent, which is significantly lower than the stated inflation. > There is a different incentive to holding which is airdrops. Depending on snapshots, you could get lucky with an airdrop that goes ballistic. > > > SOURCE INFLATION SUPPLY TODAY SUPPLY LAST YEAR > Messari 26.60 % 286,370,297 226,186,564 > Coinmarketcap 26.66 % 286,370,297 226,127,431 > Mintscan 13.82 % 313,077,417 Not provided > Atomscan 13.82 % Not provided Not provided > Cosmoscan 13.81 % 319,984,721.29 Not provided > UTILITY - Limited use. There is no reason to hold the token other than speculation > There is actually very little utility for the ATOM token. By staking ATOM, you are able to vote in Cosmos Hub governance decisions, but that is about it. There doesn't seem to be much reason to actually hold it other than it might go up or down and thus you could sell it. For context, other projects require their token to be used for fees or NFT sales. According to cryptofees, the COSMOS chain doesn't seem to actually make any money, the projects built on it do - which still doesn't seem to give a reason to hold ATOM. > DAILY ACTIVITY - It is a mystery! > Try as I might, I could not find statistics anywhere about how many addresses are actually being used on the COSMOS chain. To me, this is a massive red flag. I can find transactions on several sites quite easily, but not being able to find statistics showing me the total number of wallets created, and what percentage of them are currently being used seems impossible. This is a massive issue in terms of transparency on the chain. > Transactions > For what its worth, the average transactions seems fairly consistent, but until I can see the number of wallets that are active, I have no way of knowing if any of these are real users, bots, or just staking rewards. > MARKETCAP DOMINANCE - Falling all year > Obviously the entire crypto asset class is down this year, but if you compare like for like, you can still get a sense of whether the token is holding up well or not. > The marketcap dominance for COSMOS is roughly half of what it was at the beginning of the year. Reaching a top of around 0.6 % of the Crypto market in February, it now sits at 0.3 %. All altcoins will lose dominance in a bear market, but you would want the crypto to hold its own in the class as much as possible. Dropping 50% is not a good thing. > The dominance picked up prior to the announcement of 2.0, but has since fallen away again. > Marketcap dominance > TOTAL VALUE LOCKED - Where is it? > This value helps understand how many people are staking COSMOS and in a sense how commited investors are to the project. Yet once again this is a figure that is difficult to ascertain. > According to DefiLlama, there is no reported TVL directly for the ATOM token. Once again, they list all the projects built on top of the blockchain. The bonded tokens provided on mintscan also seem to correlate to this value. The highest individual TVL seems to CRONOS or KAVA, but I personally dont believe the locked tokens on an individual project on a blockchain should count towards the TVL on another chain. This is not necessarily a bad thing about the TVL for the ecosystem, but it begs the question again, what is the point of holding the ATOM token? > DECENTRALISATION - Some validators have too much control of the network > There are currently \~175 validators which is gives a Nakamoto Co-efficient of just 7. This is roughly the same level of decentralisation as Binance and is a terrible score. COSMOS really needs to increase the numbers of validators quickly because the distribution of tokens across the staking validators is a significant risk. > Nakamoto Coefficient > BIGGEST COMPETITION - Polkadot still higher in most cases > All cryptos are essentially in some sort of competition with each other. Due to the rationale, goals and purpose the blockchain, the biggest competitor to COSMOS is likely POLKADOT. > Again, the crypto asset class is down, by comparing marketcap dominance, Polkadot is still more than double the marketcap of COSMOS. > While Polkadot actually has about half the number of validators as COSMOS, the staking mechanism results in a much better Nakamoto-Coefficient of 85. This means Polkadot is 12 times more decentralised than Cosmos. > \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\* > CONCLUSION: > Holding the ATOM token is pretty much only for speculation - you may get some free stuff or see the price rise. > TLDR: Just read the bold headlines ***** Would you like to learn more? Check out the [Cointest archive](/r/CointestOfficial/wiki/cointest_archive#wiki_Cosmos) to find submissions for other topics.

Smooth_Pianist485

Set up an AUTOMATIC, DAILY dca for a relatively small amount of fiat. $1/day, $5/day, $30/day… whatever is a doable amount for you. I find this daily buy keeps the fomo away bc you know you’re always buying no matter the market conditions.

Glittering_Remote454

With only 12k you should be doing MAX of 200$ bets on 50x and aiming for 50-100% roi DAILY. If you was going to trade to maximise gains you should have been convicted in your belief and gone 5-10x DCAing the stack into futures contract, and you only DCA into the contract when you’re in loss! For future reference play the game like this it’s easier… I trade with 1-2k$ on 10x and aim for 20-40% a day profits then I bank that into btc or other alts collecting for next bullrun and go back in with the initial OR use the profits to yeeet into some 50x trades but only max 200$! Rome was not built in a day and neither will your portfolio. Leverage trading when done right can be very profitable it’s my main source of income since 2018. I say this as someone who has been in crypto since 2011 and been all in since 2013. For now just take it easy and don’t beat yourself up you know where you went wrong, you still have time before to accumulate don’t be dejected by your smooth brain moment.

CointestMod

#Cosmos Con-Arguments Below is a Cosmos con-argument written by gnarley_quinn. > > THE ANTI-SHILL FOR COSMOS: > INFLATION - Much too high. Staking rewards do not offset the supply increase. > There is a significant discrepancy between the inflation calculated by Messari and CoinMarketCap versus the stated inflation from the various Cosmos ecosystem scanners. > Whether it is because of some hidden lock mechanic for some tokens, and since these values are suppose to represent the circulating supply, it is not a good look for investors to have to justify why the stated inflation does not match the calculated one. > The staking rewards are averaged at 21.57% which is below the calculated inflation value, but above the stated inflation value. The staking rewards claimed on the COSMOS website also state the average APY is less than ten percent, which is significantly lower than the stated inflation. > There is a different incentive to holding which is airdrops. Depending on snapshots, you could get lucky with an airdrop that goes ballistic. > > > SOURCE INFLATION SUPPLY TODAY SUPPLY LAST YEAR > Messari 26.60 % 286,370,297 226,186,564 > Coinmarketcap 26.66 % 286,370,297 226,127,431 > Mintscan 13.82 % 313,077,417 Not provided > Atomscan 13.82 % Not provided Not provided > Cosmoscan 13.81 % 319,984,721.29 Not provided > UTILITY - Limited use. There is no reason to hold the token other than speculation > There is actually very little utility for the ATOM token. By staking ATOM, you are able to vote in Cosmos Hub governance decisions, but that is about it. There doesn't seem to be much reason to actually hold it other than it might go up or down and thus you could sell it. For context, other projects require their token to be used for fees or NFT sales. According to cryptofees, the COSMOS chain doesn't seem to actually make any money, the projects built on it do - which still doesn't seem to give a reason to hold ATOM. > DAILY ACTIVITY - It is a mystery! > Try as I might, I could not find statistics anywhere about how many addresses are actually being used on the COSMOS chain. To me, this is a massive red flag. I can find transactions on several sites quite easily, but not being able to find statistics showing me the total number of wallets created, and what percentage of them are currently being used seems impossible. This is a massive issue in terms of transparency on the chain. > Transactions > For what its worth, the average transactions seems fairly consistent, but until I can see the number of wallets that are active, I have no way of knowing if any of these are real users, bots, or just staking rewards. > MARKETCAP DOMINANCE - Falling all year > Obviously the entire crypto asset class is down this year, but if you compare like for like, you can still get a sense of whether the token is holding up well or not. > The marketcap dominance for COSMOS is roughly half of what it was at the beginning of the year. Reaching a top of around 0.6 % of the Crypto market in February, it now sits at 0.3 %. All altcoins will lose dominance in a bear market, but you would want the crypto to hold its own in the class as much as possible. Dropping 50% is not a good thing. > The dominance picked up prior to the announcement of 2.0, but has since fallen away again. > Marketcap dominance > TOTAL VALUE LOCKED - Where is it? > This value helps understand how many people are staking COSMOS and in a sense how commited investors are to the project. Yet once again this is a figure that is difficult to ascertain. > According to DefiLlama, there is no reported TVL directly for the ATOM token. Once again, they list all the projects built on top of the blockchain. The bonded tokens provided on mintscan also seem to correlate to this value. The highest individual TVL seems to CRONOS or KAVA, but I personally dont believe the locked tokens on an individual project on a blockchain should count towards the TVL on another chain. This is not necessarily a bad thing about the TVL for the ecosystem, but it begs the question again, what is the point of holding the ATOM token? > DECENTRALISATION - Some validators have too much control of the network > There are currently \~175 validators which is gives a Nakamoto Co-efficient of just 7. This is roughly the same level of decentralisation as Binance and is a terrible score. COSMOS really needs to increase the numbers of validators quickly because the distribution of tokens across the staking validators is a significant risk. > Nakamoto Coefficient > BIGGEST COMPETITION - Polkadot still higher in most cases > All cryptos are essentially in some sort of competition with each other. Due to the rationale, goals and purpose the blockchain, the biggest competitor to COSMOS is likely POLKADOT. > Again, the crypto asset class is down, by comparing marketcap dominance, Polkadot is still more than double the marketcap of COSMOS. > While Polkadot actually has about half the number of validators as COSMOS, the staking mechanism results in a much better Nakamoto-Coefficient of 85. This means Polkadot is 12 times more decentralised than Cosmos. > \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\* > CONCLUSION: > Holding the ATOM token is pretty much only for speculation - you may get some free stuff or see the price rise. > TLDR: Just read the bold headlines ***** Would you like to learn more? Check out the [Cointest archive](/r/CointestOfficial/wiki/cointest_archive#wiki_Cosmos) to find submissions for other topics.

Ecstatic_Builder8325

Everyone seems to be enjoying the 50-100% gains, while AMPL holders are sooo silent, not shilling their 2-4% DAILY compounded positive rebase gains since 10232023. 🤫

Ok-Teaching356

MAKE 2.5% DAILY WITH ITP Step 1 - Follow the link and sign up https://itpro.top/user/reg?inviteCode=5KLBL3 (You can download the app or the web browser once you have signed up) Step 2 - Download your desired crypto wallet. Some examples of this would be; OKX, Kraken, Binance etc. Verify your identity for whichever wallet you have chosen. Step 3 - Buying the cyrpto (USDT - Tether) You will now be buying this crypto to invest into ITP with. Buy the desired amount you would like to invest with ITP baring in mind $100 is the minimum investment for this platform. Step 4 - Putting the crypto into ITP You will go on to ITP and select the assets button at the bottom of your screen. After that press the big green button which says ‘Recharge’ and copy your deposit address. Step 5 - Putting the crypto into ITP (Part 2) Go back on to your crypto wallet and select the withdraw button. You will then enter the desired amount of crypto you wish to invest and paste the ITP deposit address in and follow through. Step 6 - Quantizing The amount will appear into ITP within a few minutes which means you have now succesfully invested with ITP and are ready to make some money. You would do this by pressing the ‘Quantize’ button at the bottom of ITP and hit the big blue button which says ‘Single start ITP quantification’. Each time you press the button it will take a couple minutes but you will need to press this 5 times a day. (Couple minutes work a day) Step 7 - ENJOY! enjoy your daily profits at 2.5% and withdraw to your crypto wallet whenever you are ready. Any questions feel free to message

CointestMod

#Cosmos Con-Arguments Below is a Cosmos con-argument written by gnarley_quinn. > > THE ANTI-SHILL FOR COSMOS: > INFLATION - Much too high. Staking rewards do not offset the supply increase. > There is a significant discrepancy between the inflation calculated by Messari and CoinMarketCap versus the stated inflation from the various Cosmos ecosystem scanners. > Whether it is because of some hidden lock mechanic for some tokens, and since these values are suppose to represent the circulating supply, it is not a good look for investors to have to justify why the stated inflation does not match the calculated one. > The staking rewards are averaged at 21.57% which is below the calculated inflation value, but above the stated inflation value. The staking rewards claimed on the COSMOS website also state the average APY is less than ten percent, which is significantly lower than the stated inflation. > There is a different incentive to holding which is airdrops. Depending on snapshots, you could get lucky with an airdrop that goes ballistic. > > > SOURCE INFLATION SUPPLY TODAY SUPPLY LAST YEAR > Messari 26.60 % 286,370,297 226,186,564 > Coinmarketcap 26.66 % 286,370,297 226,127,431 > Mintscan 13.82 % 313,077,417 Not provided > Atomscan 13.82 % Not provided Not provided > Cosmoscan 13.81 % 319,984,721.29 Not provided > UTILITY - Limited use. There is no reason to hold the token other than speculation > There is actually very little utility for the ATOM token. By staking ATOM, you are able to vote in Cosmos Hub governance decisions, but that is about it. There doesn't seem to be much reason to actually hold it other than it might go up or down and thus you could sell it. For context, other projects require their token to be used for fees or NFT sales. According to cryptofees, the COSMOS chain doesn't seem to actually make any money, the projects built on it do - which still doesn't seem to give a reason to hold ATOM. > DAILY ACTIVITY - It is a mystery! > Try as I might, I could not find statistics anywhere about how many addresses are actually being used on the COSMOS chain. To me, this is a massive red flag. I can find transactions on several sites quite easily, but not being able to find statistics showing me the total number of wallets created, and what percentage of them are currently being used seems impossible. This is a massive issue in terms of transparency on the chain. > Transactions > For what its worth, the average transactions seems fairly consistent, but until I can see the number of wallets that are active, I have no way of knowing if any of these are real users, bots, or just staking rewards. > MARKETCAP DOMINANCE - Falling all year > Obviously the entire crypto asset class is down this year, but if you compare like for like, you can still get a sense of whether the token is holding up well or not. > The marketcap dominance for COSMOS is roughly half of what it was at the beginning of the year. Reaching a top of around 0.6 % of the Crypto market in February, it now sits at 0.3 %. All altcoins will lose dominance in a bear market, but you would want the crypto to hold its own in the class as much as possible. Dropping 50% is not a good thing. > The dominance picked up prior to the announcement of 2.0, but has since fallen away again. > Marketcap dominance > TOTAL VALUE LOCKED - Where is it? > This value helps understand how many people are staking COSMOS and in a sense how commited investors are to the project. Yet once again this is a figure that is difficult to ascertain. > According to DefiLlama, there is no reported TVL directly for the ATOM token. Once again, they list all the projects built on top of the blockchain. The bonded tokens provided on mintscan also seem to correlate to this value. The highest individual TVL seems to CRONOS or KAVA, but I personally dont believe the locked tokens on an individual project on a blockchain should count towards the TVL on another chain. This is not necessarily a bad thing about the TVL for the ecosystem, but it begs the question again, what is the point of holding the ATOM token? > DECENTRALISATION - Some validators have too much control of the network > There are currently \~175 validators which is gives a Nakamoto Co-efficient of just 7. This is roughly the same level of decentralisation as Binance and is a terrible score. COSMOS really needs to increase the numbers of validators quickly because the distribution of tokens across the staking validators is a significant risk. > Nakamoto Coefficient > BIGGEST COMPETITION - Polkadot still higher in most cases > All cryptos are essentially in some sort of competition with each other. Due to the rationale, goals and purpose the blockchain, the biggest competitor to COSMOS is likely POLKADOT. > Again, the crypto asset class is down, by comparing marketcap dominance, Polkadot is still more than double the marketcap of COSMOS. > While Polkadot actually has about half the number of validators as COSMOS, the staking mechanism results in a much better Nakamoto-Coefficient of 85. This means Polkadot is 12 times more decentralised than Cosmos. > \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\* > CONCLUSION: > Holding the ATOM token is pretty much only for speculation - you may get some free stuff or see the price rise. > TLDR: Just read the bold headlines ***** Would you like to learn more? Check out the [Cointest archive](/r/CointestOfficial/wiki/cointest_archive#wiki_Cosmos) to find submissions for other topics.

Awkward_Potential_

Last week I was like "fuck reddit. Fuck r/cc. Fuck moons. Fuck the daily!". This week I'm like "CAN'T WAIT TO SEE WHAT THE DAILY US SAYING ABOUT THIS PUMP".

CointestMod

#Cosmos Con-Arguments Below is a Cosmos con-argument written by gnarley_quinn. > > THE ANTI-SHILL FOR COSMOS: > INFLATION - Much too high. Staking rewards do not offset the supply increase. > There is a significant discrepancy between the inflation calculated by Messari and CoinMarketCap versus the stated inflation from the various Cosmos ecosystem scanners. > Whether it is because of some hidden lock mechanic for some tokens, and since these values are suppose to represent the circulating supply, it is not a good look for investors to have to justify why the stated inflation does not match the calculated one. > The staking rewards are averaged at 21.57% which is below the calculated inflation value, but above the stated inflation value. The staking rewards claimed on the COSMOS website also state the average APY is less than ten percent, which is significantly lower than the stated inflation. > There is a different incentive to holding which is airdrops. Depending on snapshots, you could get lucky with an airdrop that goes ballistic. > > > SOURCE INFLATION SUPPLY TODAY SUPPLY LAST YEAR > Messari 26.60 % 286,370,297 226,186,564 > Coinmarketcap 26.66 % 286,370,297 226,127,431 > Mintscan 13.82 % 313,077,417 Not provided > Atomscan 13.82 % Not provided Not provided > Cosmoscan 13.81 % 319,984,721.29 Not provided > UTILITY - Limited use. There is no reason to hold the token other than speculation > There is actually very little utility for the ATOM token. By staking ATOM, you are able to vote in Cosmos Hub governance decisions, but that is about it. There doesn't seem to be much reason to actually hold it other than it might go up or down and thus you could sell it. For context, other projects require their token to be used for fees or NFT sales. According to cryptofees, the COSMOS chain doesn't seem to actually make any money, the projects built on it do - which still doesn't seem to give a reason to hold ATOM. > DAILY ACTIVITY - It is a mystery! > Try as I might, I could not find statistics anywhere about how many addresses are actually being used on the COSMOS chain. To me, this is a massive red flag. I can find transactions on several sites quite easily, but not being able to find statistics showing me the total number of wallets created, and what percentage of them are currently being used seems impossible. This is a massive issue in terms of transparency on the chain. > Transactions > For what its worth, the average transactions seems fairly consistent, but until I can see the number of wallets that are active, I have no way of knowing if any of these are real users, bots, or just staking rewards. > MARKETCAP DOMINANCE - Falling all year > Obviously the entire crypto asset class is down this year, but if you compare like for like, you can still get a sense of whether the token is holding up well or not. > The marketcap dominance for COSMOS is roughly half of what it was at the beginning of the year. Reaching a top of around 0.6 % of the Crypto market in February, it now sits at 0.3 %. All altcoins will lose dominance in a bear market, but you would want the crypto to hold its own in the class as much as possible. Dropping 50% is not a good thing. > The dominance picked up prior to the announcement of 2.0, but has since fallen away again. > Marketcap dominance > TOTAL VALUE LOCKED - Where is it? > This value helps understand how many people are staking COSMOS and in a sense how commited investors are to the project. Yet once again this is a figure that is difficult to ascertain. > According to DefiLlama, there is no reported TVL directly for the ATOM token. Once again, they list all the projects built on top of the blockchain. The bonded tokens provided on mintscan also seem to correlate to this value. The highest individual TVL seems to CRONOS or KAVA, but I personally dont believe the locked tokens on an individual project on a blockchain should count towards the TVL on another chain. This is not necessarily a bad thing about the TVL for the ecosystem, but it begs the question again, what is the point of holding the ATOM token? > DECENTRALISATION - Some validators have too much control of the network > There are currently \~175 validators which is gives a Nakamoto Co-efficient of just 7. This is roughly the same level of decentralisation as Binance and is a terrible score. COSMOS really needs to increase the numbers of validators quickly because the distribution of tokens across the staking validators is a significant risk. > Nakamoto Coefficient > BIGGEST COMPETITION - Polkadot still higher in most cases > All cryptos are essentially in some sort of competition with each other. Due to the rationale, goals and purpose the blockchain, the biggest competitor to COSMOS is likely POLKADOT. > Again, the crypto asset class is down, by comparing marketcap dominance, Polkadot is still more than double the marketcap of COSMOS. > While Polkadot actually has about half the number of validators as COSMOS, the staking mechanism results in a much better Nakamoto-Coefficient of 85. This means Polkadot is 12 times more decentralised than Cosmos. > \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\* > CONCLUSION: > Holding the ATOM token is pretty much only for speculation - you may get some free stuff or see the price rise. > TLDR: Just read the bold headlines ***** Would you like to learn more? Check out the [Cointest archive](/r/CointestOfficial/wiki/cointest_archive#wiki_Cosmos) to find submissions for other topics.

babydriver88

If we goo full CHRISTIAN BALE GAME IN THE DAILY this could actually turn good haha

Blooberino

For those who came into crypto in the last two years, I can't explain how good it feels to see the bull in full effect. And you won't even have to ask yourself if it's here (is this the bull?), it will be overly apparent. Seeing everything making gains of 3-5% DAILY. Seeing some alts have 25% days, followed by a 3% dip the next day, only to surge another 25% the following day. Seeing green across the board. And it seems like it can't possibly pump any more, and then it does. I can't wait for that feeling to return, just seeing gains that just keep screaming upward for months. Hold on tight!

CointestMod

#Cosmos Con-Arguments Below is a Cosmos con-argument written by gnarley_quinn. > > THE ANTI-SHILL FOR COSMOS: > INFLATION - Much too high. Staking rewards do not offset the supply increase. > There is a significant discrepancy between the inflation calculated by Messari and CoinMarketCap versus the stated inflation from the various Cosmos ecosystem scanners. > Whether it is because of some hidden lock mechanic for some tokens, and since these values are suppose to represent the circulating supply, it is not a good look for investors to have to justify why the stated inflation does not match the calculated one. > The staking rewards are averaged at 21.57% which is below the calculated inflation value, but above the stated inflation value. The staking rewards claimed on the COSMOS website also state the average APY is less than ten percent, which is significantly lower than the stated inflation. > There is a different incentive to holding which is airdrops. Depending on snapshots, you could get lucky with an airdrop that goes ballistic. > > > SOURCE INFLATION SUPPLY TODAY SUPPLY LAST YEAR > Messari 26.60 % 286,370,297 226,186,564 > Coinmarketcap 26.66 % 286,370,297 226,127,431 > Mintscan 13.82 % 313,077,417 Not provided > Atomscan 13.82 % Not provided Not provided > Cosmoscan 13.81 % 319,984,721.29 Not provided > UTILITY - Limited use. There is no reason to hold the token other than speculation > There is actually very little utility for the ATOM token. By staking ATOM, you are able to vote in Cosmos Hub governance decisions, but that is about it. There doesn't seem to be much reason to actually hold it other than it might go up or down and thus you could sell it. For context, other projects require their token to be used for fees or NFT sales. According to cryptofees, the COSMOS chain doesn't seem to actually make any money, the projects built on it do - which still doesn't seem to give a reason to hold ATOM. > DAILY ACTIVITY - It is a mystery! > Try as I might, I could not find statistics anywhere about how many addresses are actually being used on the COSMOS chain. To me, this is a massive red flag. I can find transactions on several sites quite easily, but not being able to find statistics showing me the total number of wallets created, and what percentage of them are currently being used seems impossible. This is a massive issue in terms of transparency on the chain. > Transactions > For what its worth, the average transactions seems fairly consistent, but until I can see the number of wallets that are active, I have no way of knowing if any of these are real users, bots, or just staking rewards. > MARKETCAP DOMINANCE - Falling all year > Obviously the entire crypto asset class is down this year, but if you compare like for like, you can still get a sense of whether the token is holding up well or not. > The marketcap dominance for COSMOS is roughly half of what it was at the beginning of the year. Reaching a top of around 0.6 % of the Crypto market in February, it now sits at 0.3 %. All altcoins will lose dominance in a bear market, but you would want the crypto to hold its own in the class as much as possible. Dropping 50% is not a good thing. > The dominance picked up prior to the announcement of 2.0, but has since fallen away again. > Marketcap dominance > TOTAL VALUE LOCKED - Where is it? > This value helps understand how many people are staking COSMOS and in a sense how commited investors are to the project. Yet once again this is a figure that is difficult to ascertain. > According to DefiLlama, there is no reported TVL directly for the ATOM token. Once again, they list all the projects built on top of the blockchain. The bonded tokens provided on mintscan also seem to correlate to this value. The highest individual TVL seems to CRONOS or KAVA, but I personally dont believe the locked tokens on an individual project on a blockchain should count towards the TVL on another chain. This is not necessarily a bad thing about the TVL for the ecosystem, but it begs the question again, what is the point of holding the ATOM token? > DECENTRALISATION - Some validators have too much control of the network > There are currently \~175 validators which is gives a Nakamoto Co-efficient of just 7. This is roughly the same level of decentralisation as Binance and is a terrible score. COSMOS really needs to increase the numbers of validators quickly because the distribution of tokens across the staking validators is a significant risk. > Nakamoto Coefficient > BIGGEST COMPETITION - Polkadot still higher in most cases > All cryptos are essentially in some sort of competition with each other. Due to the rationale, goals and purpose the blockchain, the biggest competitor to COSMOS is likely POLKADOT. > Again, the crypto asset class is down, by comparing marketcap dominance, Polkadot is still more than double the marketcap of COSMOS. > While Polkadot actually has about half the number of validators as COSMOS, the staking mechanism results in a much better Nakamoto-Coefficient of 85. This means Polkadot is 12 times more decentralised than Cosmos. > \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\* > CONCLUSION: > Holding the ATOM token is pretty much only for speculation - you may get some free stuff or see the price rise. > TLDR: Just read the bold headlines ***** Would you like to learn more? Check out the [Cointest archive](/r/CointestOfficial/wiki/cointest_archive#wiki_Cosmos) to find submissions for other topics.

CointestMod

#Cosmos Con-Arguments Below is a Cosmos con-argument written by gnarley_quinn. > > THE ANTI-SHILL FOR COSMOS: > INFLATION - Much too high. Staking rewards do not offset the supply increase. > There is a significant discrepancy between the inflation calculated by Messari and CoinMarketCap versus the stated inflation from the various Cosmos ecosystem scanners. > Whether it is because of some hidden lock mechanic for some tokens, and since these values are suppose to represent the circulating supply, it is not a good look for investors to have to justify why the stated inflation does not match the calculated one. > The staking rewards are averaged at 21.57% which is below the calculated inflation value, but above the stated inflation value. The staking rewards claimed on the COSMOS website also state the average APY is less than ten percent, which is significantly lower than the stated inflation. > There is a different incentive to holding which is airdrops. Depending on snapshots, you could get lucky with an airdrop that goes ballistic. > > > SOURCE INFLATION SUPPLY TODAY SUPPLY LAST YEAR > Messari 26.60 % 286,370,297 226,186,564 > Coinmarketcap 26.66 % 286,370,297 226,127,431 > Mintscan 13.82 % 313,077,417 Not provided > Atomscan 13.82 % Not provided Not provided > Cosmoscan 13.81 % 319,984,721.29 Not provided > UTILITY - Limited use. There is no reason to hold the token other than speculation > There is actually very little utility for the ATOM token. By staking ATOM, you are able to vote in Cosmos Hub governance decisions, but that is about it. There doesn't seem to be much reason to actually hold it other than it might go up or down and thus you could sell it. For context, other projects require their token to be used for fees or NFT sales. According to cryptofees, the COSMOS chain doesn't seem to actually make any money, the projects built on it do - which still doesn't seem to give a reason to hold ATOM. > DAILY ACTIVITY - It is a mystery! > Try as I might, I could not find statistics anywhere about how many addresses are actually being used on the COSMOS chain. To me, this is a massive red flag. I can find transactions on several sites quite easily, but not being able to find statistics showing me the total number of wallets created, and what percentage of them are currently being used seems impossible. This is a massive issue in terms of transparency on the chain. > Transactions > For what its worth, the average transactions seems fairly consistent, but until I can see the number of wallets that are active, I have no way of knowing if any of these are real users, bots, or just staking rewards. > MARKETCAP DOMINANCE - Falling all year > Obviously the entire crypto asset class is down this year, but if you compare like for like, you can still get a sense of whether the token is holding up well or not. > The marketcap dominance for COSMOS is roughly half of what it was at the beginning of the year. Reaching a top of around 0.6 % of the Crypto market in February, it now sits at 0.3 %. All altcoins will lose dominance in a bear market, but you would want the crypto to hold its own in the class as much as possible. Dropping 50% is not a good thing. > The dominance picked up prior to the announcement of 2.0, but has since fallen away again. > Marketcap dominance > TOTAL VALUE LOCKED - Where is it? > This value helps understand how many people are staking COSMOS and in a sense how commited investors are to the project. Yet once again this is a figure that is difficult to ascertain. > According to DefiLlama, there is no reported TVL directly for the ATOM token. Once again, they list all the projects built on top of the blockchain. The bonded tokens provided on mintscan also seem to correlate to this value. The highest individual TVL seems to CRONOS or KAVA, but I personally dont believe the locked tokens on an individual project on a blockchain should count towards the TVL on another chain. This is not necessarily a bad thing about the TVL for the ecosystem, but it begs the question again, what is the point of holding the ATOM token? > DECENTRALISATION - Some validators have too much control of the network > There are currently \~175 validators which is gives a Nakamoto Co-efficient of just 7. This is roughly the same level of decentralisation as Binance and is a terrible score. COSMOS really needs to increase the numbers of validators quickly because the distribution of tokens across the staking validators is a significant risk. > Nakamoto Coefficient > BIGGEST COMPETITION - Polkadot still higher in most cases > All cryptos are essentially in some sort of competition with each other. Due to the rationale, goals and purpose the blockchain, the biggest competitor to COSMOS is likely POLKADOT. > Again, the crypto asset class is down, by comparing marketcap dominance, Polkadot is still more than double the marketcap of COSMOS. > While Polkadot actually has about half the number of validators as COSMOS, the staking mechanism results in a much better Nakamoto-Coefficient of 85. This means Polkadot is 12 times more decentralised than Cosmos. > \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\* > CONCLUSION: > Holding the ATOM token is pretty much only for speculation - you may get some free stuff or see the price rise. > TLDR: Just read the bold headlines ***** Would you like to learn more? Check out the [Cointest archive](/r/CointestOfficial/wiki/cointest_archive#wiki_Cosmos) to find submissions for other topics.

jennyYESs

This basically stole 8.3m DAILY. That's how much his "sentence" of 4 months think he deserves.

aminok

Ethereum Layer 2 activity update: | # | NAME | PAST DAY TPS | 7D CHANGE | MAX DAILY TPS | 30D COUNT | DATA SOURCE | |----:|:----------------------|-------------:|----------:|-------------:|----------:|:---------------| | 1 | Base | 13.77 | +6.25% | 21.29 | 22.52 M | Blockchain RPC | | 2 | Ethereum | 12.05 | +3.82% | 22.37 | 30.45 M | Blockchain RPC | | 3 | zkSync Era | 11.15 | -10.77% | 15.25 | 29.99 M | Blockchain RPC | | 4 | Arbitrum One | 6.85 | +5.58% | 31.64 | 15.99 M | Blockchain RPC | | 5 | Starknet | 6.30 | -13.01% | 10.16 | 19.90 M | Blockchain RPC | | 6 | OP Mainnet | 3.66 | +2.80% | 10.43 | 9.75 M | Blockchain RPC | | 7 | Mantle | 2.97 | +23.36% | 4.25 | 6.79 M | Blockchain RPC | | 8 | Immutable X | 1.97 | -28.93% | 39.35 | 6.28 M | Closed API | | 9 | dYdX | 1.55 | -42.51% | 11.45 | 5.51 M | Closed API | | 10 | Arbitrum Nova | 1.32 | +23.86% | 10.93 | 2.76 M | Blockchain RPC | | 11 | ApeX | 1.31 | -10.27% | 1.64 | 3.36 M | Closed API | | 12 | Linea | 1.23 | -18.24% | 2.26 | 3.87 M | Blockchain RPC | | 13 | Sorare | 0.73 | -38.23% | 2.31 | 1.48 M | Closed API | | 14 | zkSync Lite | 0.68 | -6.87% | 3.29 | 1.99 M | Explorer API | | 15 | Zora | 0.64 | -6.23% | 1.63 | 2.37 M | Blockchain RPC | | 16 | Polygon zkEVM | 0.28 | -16.45% | 1.41 | 858 K | Blockchain RPC | | 17 | Metis Andromeda | 0.16 | -24.49% | 1.25 | 470 K | Blockchain RPC | | 18 | Myria | 0.13 | -47.07% | 10.27 | 689 K | Closed API | | 19 | Loopring | 0.04 | +15.58% | 1.48 | 86.85 K | Explorer API | | 20 | Kroma | 0.03 | +756.59% | 0.13 | 36.17 K | Blockchain RPC | source: https://l2beat.com/scaling/activity Mantle is seeing significant growth in activity. This project is planning to use EigenDA's ETH restaking technology to obtain massive Data Availability for its Rollup.

Collectibl3

They can take our moons BUT NOT OUR DAILY!

Affectionate_Hand_76

This DAILY. I spend considerable time here.

rootpl

But hey, look at the bright side, at least they delivered another crypto failure. I was getting worried that we wouldn't get another DAILY crypto hack today, it's been nearly 20 hours since the last one. /s

Affectionate_Hand_76

I use the technical analysis called the “DAILY THREAD”. If market drops 1% extreme fear, if it gains 1% BTC 100K EOY.

xllw

DAILY CRYPTO QUOTE: “When it is Bitcoin; bad or good news doesn't matter too much. Be the long-term HODLER. That is all that really matters in this game of risk and reward.” ― Olawale Daniel

xllw

DAILY CRYPTO QUOTE: Bitcoin is the honey badger of money - it's tough, resilient, and virtually indestructible. -Arif Naseem

Affectionate_Hand_76

Hello, I am Gary Gensler 👺 and I classify this DAILY thread as a security.

Limp-Crab8542

1. NOBODY BUT NAIVE LIBERTARIANS WANTS A PERMISSIONLESS MONEY SYSTEM THOUGH. The moment you start thinking about how this would work I practice you come to realize it would be slow, inefficient and full of scams. 2. This is a very very stupid argument. Something being based on math/code does not inherently shield it from human tendencies because…like…it’s humans that still have to use it. I mean, the internet is made of code…but obviously humans will still do awful human things with it. Crypto is just a piece of technology like any other. It’s not some special magic that solves the problem of human greed…like CLEARLY ALL THE FUCKING SCAMS THAT HAPPEN ON A DAILY BASIS SHOULD TELL YOU THAT. Do you people even think about what you type?

No_Wrongdoer9160

I'm gonna tell my grandkids how I had to cross so many obstacles to get to the DAILY.

aminok

Update on the Ethereum L2 techstrate: | # | NAME | PAST DAY TPS | 7D CHANGE | MAX DAILY TPS | 30D COUNT | DATA SOURCE | |----:|:------------------|-------------:|----------:|-------------:|----------:|:-------------| | 1 | zkSync Era | 11.86 | +11.08% | 15.25 | 29.35 M | Blockchain RPC | | 2 | Ethereum | 11.74 | +0.76% | 22.37 | 30.49 M | Blockchain RPC | | 3 | Starknet | 8.69 | +26.99% | 9.01 | 14.63 M | Blockchain RPC | | 4 | Arbitrum One | 5.88 | -11.74% | 31.64 | 17.09 M | Blockchain RPC | | 5 | Base | 4.13 | +1.99% | 15.88 | 15.66 M | Blockchain RPC | | 6 | OP Mainnet | 4.02 | +1.51% | 10.43 | 12.41 M | Blockchain RPC | | 7 | Mantle | 3.04 | +23.26% | 3.04 | 4.31 M | Blockchain RPC | | 8 | Linea | 1.65 | +20.48% | 2.26 | 3.36 M | Blockchain RPC | | 9 | dYdX | 1.47 | -36.24% | 11.45 | 5.49 M | Closed API | | 10 | Immutable X | 1.45 | -21.74% | 39.35 | 6.18 M | Closed API | | 11 | ApeX | 1.00 | -18.74% | 1.47 | 2.88 M | Closed API | | 12 | Zora Network | 0.96 | +3.33% | 1.63 | 2.49 M | Blockchain RPC | | 13 | Arbitrum Nova | 0.91 | -21.03% | 10.93 | 3.33 M | Blockchain RPC | | 14 | zkSync Lite | 0.79 | +9.99% | 3.29 | 2.01 M | Explorer API | | 15 | Sorare | 0.45 | -45.85% | 2.31 | 1.62 M | Closed API | | 16 | Polygon zkEVM | 0.34 | -0.93% | 1.41 | 985 K | Blockchain RPC | | 17 | Myria | 0.22 | -27.29% | 10.27 | 470 K | Closed API | | 18 | Loopring | 0.02 | -47.12% | 1.48 | 98.97 K | Explorer API | | 19 | rhino.fi | 0.02 | -18.89% | 0.42 | 86.14 K | Closed API | | 20 | Boba Network | <0.01 | -4.55% | 0.29 | 10.83 K | Blockchain RPC | | 21 | Public Goods Network | <0.01 | -27.03% | 0.06 | 30.76 K | Blockchain RPC | | 22 | Aztec | 0.00 | -100.00% | 0.05 | 30.00 | Explorer API | via https://l2beat.com/scaling/activity The past week saw significant growth in activity among the leading L2s, with the exception of Arbitrum One, which experienced a decline. The most noteworthy uptick was StarkNet's 27% weekly increase in activity. Mantle and Linea also continued their progress up the ranking, both making it into the top 10 on the back of a greater than 20% weekly increase in activity.

bitcoin_barry

"lazer gaze till 100k" - it was a meme that people thought would be short lived when the price was sky rocketing last year. If you want to have a chuckle, a bitcoiner nym called "yellow" committed to hosting a DAILY twitter spaces where he plays the "don't stop believing" song. He has done it every day since and its live too, he makes jokes every time. Fucking Legend! https://twitter.com/ICOffenderII/status/1699520933491278084

Giga79

Last time ETH hit $5K there were 13,000 new coins being minted through POW. $5000 x 13,000 = $65,000,000 of DAILY buy pressure just to offset miner sell pressure, to maintain the price. Today under 3K ETH are being minted through POS. That number is dynamic, maybe 5K will be minted during a bull. $10,000 x 5,000 = $50,000,000 of daily buy pressure to offset POTENTIAL staker sell pressure (they have no expenses, remember), to maintain the price. It's a different chart now, and there's less gravity weighing this one down. When ETH is around ATH again there will be buy pressure from people wanting to unlock staking yields, instead of the insane buy pressure for GPUs *at any price* which lead to worldwide shortages. 3 years ago ETH was $80. I don't think anyone can realistically predict what crypto will be worth 7-10 years away - we'd all be drastically under or over. If you asked 5 years ago I don't think very many would've predicted $2K was even possible. 7-10 years is probably fair though. $10K equals half the market cap of gold iirc, and that's crazy to imagine.

Awkward_Potential_

How dare you post that in the DAILY! You don't deserve that karma, God damn it!

slasula

wait, 24 million is lost DAILY when people die with their wallets. am I reading that correctly?

ConsistentExplorer46

I love love love InvestAnswers’s, he’s like the Econ professor you never had. He post videos DAILY.

Impossible-Injury932

Yeah I saw that argued it in MeTa and here , they tried to sugarcoat it but the reduction in THE DAILY will go DOWN 90%.

aminok

Reposting this for exposure, Ethereum Layer 2 activity over the last week: | # | NAME | PAST DAY TPS | 7D CHANGE | MAX DAILY TPS | 30D COUNT | DATA SOURCE | |----:|:------------------|-------------:|----------:|-------------:|----------:|:-------------| | 1 | Ethereum | 12.10 | -2.86% | 22.37 | 30.97 M | Blockchain RPC | | 2 | zkSync Era | 11.69 | +34.93% | 13.44 | 27.62 M | Blockchain RPC | | 3 | Base | 8.60 | +73.74% | 15.88 | 13.39 M | Blockchain RPC | | 4 | Arbitrum One | 7.05 | +2.38% | 31.64 | 18.56 M | Blockchain RPC | | 5 | OP Mainnet | 5.00 | -29.31% | 10.43 | 17.78 M | Blockchain RPC | | 6 | Starknet | 4.95 | +52.14% | 6.49 | 9.65 M | Blockchain RPC | | 7 | Immutable X | 3.56 | -8.20% | 39.35 | 6.05 M | Closed API | | 8 | dYdX | 2.46 | -21.79% | 11.45 | 6.07 M | Closed API | | 9 | Arbitrum Nova | 1.70 | +30.14% | 10.93 | 3.75 M | Blockchain RPC | | 10 | Linea | 1.35 | +85.01% | 1.63 | 2.71 M | Blockchain RPC | | 11 | Mantle | 1.34 | +13.74% | 1.63 | 2.71 M | Blockchain RPC | | 12 | Zora Network | 1.24 | -6.78% | 1.63 | 1.62 M | Blockchain RPC | | 13 | ApeX | 0.92 | -22.19% | 1.38 | 2.56 M | Closed API | | 14 | zkSync Lite | 0.81 | +41.47% | 3.29 | 1.94 M | Explorer API | | 15 | Sorare | 0.80 | +21.05% | 2.31 | 1.43 M | Closed API | | 16 | Polygon zkEVM | 0.43 | +29.12% | 1.41 | 1.75 M | Blockchain RPC | | 17 | Metis Andromeda | 0.37 | +43.42% | 1.25 | 747 K | Blockchain RPC | | 18 | Myria | 0.07 | -50.16% | 10.27 | 451 K | Closed API | | 19 | Loopring | 0.04 | +18.46% | 1.48 | 130 K | Explorer API | | 20 | rhino.fi | 0.04 | +23.77% | 0.42 | 123 K | Closed API | | 21 | Public Goods Network | 0.02 | +41.62% | 0.02 | 19.28 K | Blockchain RPC | | 22 | Boba Network | <0.01 | +32.50% | 0.29 | 12.44 K | Blockchain RPC | | 23 | Aztec | <0.01 | +0.00% | 0.05 | 106 | Explorer API | via: https://l2beat.com/scaling/activity L2s continue to see surging activity. Major growth in activity was seen on several of major Rollups: zkSync Era, StarkNet, and the newcomer–which also saw rapid growth in the prior week—Coinbase's Base. Another highlight is Arbitrum Nova, which is a massively scalable Ethereum-based validium and home to Reddit Community Points (MOON and BRICK). It followed the prior week's trend and saw rapid activity growth.

Chavarlison

Wtf are they doing that it costs 1.5M DAILY?!

aminok

Ethereum Layer 2 activity over the last week: | # | NAME | PAST DAY TPS | 7D CHANGE | MAX DAILY TPS | 30D COUNT | DATA SOURCE | |----:|:------------------|-------------:|----------:|-------------:|----------:|:-------------| | 1 | Ethereum | 12.10 | -2.86% | 22.37 | 30.97 M | Blockchain RPC | | 2 | zkSync Era | 11.69 | +34.93% | 13.44 | 27.62 M | Blockchain RPC | | 3 | Base | 8.60 | +73.74% | 15.88 | 13.39 M | Blockchain RPC | | 4 | Arbitrum One | 7.05 | +2.38% | 31.64 | 18.56 M | Blockchain RPC | | 5 | OP Mainnet | 5.00 | -29.31% | 10.43 | 17.78 M | Blockchain RPC | | 6 | Starknet | 4.95 | +52.14% | 6.49 | 9.65 M | Blockchain RPC | | 7 | Immutable X | 3.56 | -8.20% | 39.35 | 6.05 M | Closed API | | 8 | dYdX | 2.46 | -21.79% | 11.45 | 6.07 M | Closed API | | 9 | Arbitrum Nova | 1.70 | +30.14% | 10.93 | 3.75 M | Blockchain RPC | | 10 | Linea | 1.35 | +85.01% | 1.63 | 2.71 M | Blockchain RPC | | 11 | Mantle | 1.34 | +13.74% | 1.63 | 2.71 M | Blockchain RPC | | 12 | Zora Network | 1.24 | -6.78% | 1.63 | 1.62 M | Blockchain RPC | | 13 | ApeX | 0.92 | -22.19% | 1.38 | 2.56 M | Closed API | | 14 | zkSync Lite | 0.81 | +41.47% | 3.29 | 1.94 M | Explorer API | | 15 | Sorare | 0.80 | +21.05% | 2.31 | 1.43 M | Closed API | | 16 | Polygon zkEVM | 0.43 | +29.12% | 1.41 | 1.75 M | Blockchain RPC | | 17 | Metis Andromeda | 0.37 | +43.42% | 1.25 | 747 K | Blockchain RPC | | 18 | Myria | 0.07 | -50.16% | 10.27 | 451 K | Closed API | | 19 | Loopring | 0.04 | +18.46% | 1.48 | 130 K | Explorer API | | 20 | rhino.fi | 0.04 | +23.77% | 0.42 | 123 K | Closed API | | 21 | Public Goods Network | 0.02 | +41.62% | 0.02 | 19.28 K | Blockchain RPC | | 22 | Boba Network | <0.01 | +32.50% | 0.29 | 12.44 K | Blockchain RPC | | 23 | Aztec | <0.01 | +0.00% | 0.05 | 106 | Explorer API | via: https://l2beat.com/scaling/activity L2s continue to see surging activity. Major growth in activity was seen on several of major Rollups: zkSync Era, StarkNet, and the newcomer–which also saw rapid growth in the prior week—Coinbase's Base. Another highlight is Arbitrum Nova, which is a massively scalable Ethereum-based validium and home to Reddit Community Points (MOON and BRICK). It followed the prior week's trend and saw rapid activity growth.

elsphinc

I know crazy eh..this person dropping all this learning on us, IN THE DAILY!