SHILL

Background-Paper-686

Nope. I'm giving you an opportunity to SHILL ME and EVERYONE ELSE READING the meme coin that BEATS Catgirl BASED on Vitalik's post IN The CMC Top 1000. Can you name any or...?

RightTea4247

$SHILL airdrops

poops314

Buy $SHILL /s

sarup23

Why would.u even buy this... SHILL!

RumpleHelgaskin

The original “influencers” prior to TikTok and Instagram! Getting paid to SHILL the public on subjects or products that corps, politicians, and the wealthy want disseminated to the public.

TheRealRealThang

Mitch Ray. IMO, honest, observant, discusses the real topics. Doesn't SHILL anything, ever.

DingDongWhoDis

It's already succeeding with real world adoption despite struggling with retail hype. Retail was always an afterthought for Algorand, and it's done a shit job marketing in that area. Price action will happen eventually. With zero downtime, instant finality, no forking/double spending, and no FAILED TRANSACTIONS. This concludes my "shill" effort, I now return you to the previously scheduled program of SHILL FEST 2023 (hype campaign) for all other chains, already well in progress.

CointestMod

#Cosmos Con-Arguments Below is a Cosmos con-argument written by gnarley_quinn. > > THE ANTI-SHILL FOR COSMOS: > INFLATION - Much too high. Staking rewards do not offset the supply increase. > There is a significant discrepancy between the inflation calculated by Messari and CoinMarketCap versus the stated inflation from the various Cosmos ecosystem scanners. > Whether it is because of some hidden lock mechanic for some tokens, and since these values are suppose to represent the circulating supply, it is not a good look for investors to have to justify why the stated inflation does not match the calculated one. > The staking rewards are averaged at 21.57% which is below the calculated inflation value, but above the stated inflation value. The staking rewards claimed on the COSMOS website also state the average APY is less than ten percent, which is significantly lower than the stated inflation. > There is a different incentive to holding which is airdrops. Depending on snapshots, you could get lucky with an airdrop that goes ballistic. > > > SOURCE INFLATION SUPPLY TODAY SUPPLY LAST YEAR > Messari 26.60 % 286,370,297 226,186,564 > Coinmarketcap 26.66 % 286,370,297 226,127,431 > Mintscan 13.82 % 313,077,417 Not provided > Atomscan 13.82 % Not provided Not provided > Cosmoscan 13.81 % 319,984,721.29 Not provided > UTILITY - Limited use. There is no reason to hold the token other than speculation > There is actually very little utility for the ATOM token. By staking ATOM, you are able to vote in Cosmos Hub governance decisions, but that is about it. There doesn't seem to be much reason to actually hold it other than it might go up or down and thus you could sell it. For context, other projects require their token to be used for fees or NFT sales. According to cryptofees, the COSMOS chain doesn't seem to actually make any money, the projects built on it do - which still doesn't seem to give a reason to hold ATOM. > DAILY ACTIVITY - It is a mystery! > Try as I might, I could not find statistics anywhere about how many addresses are actually being used on the COSMOS chain. To me, this is a massive red flag. I can find transactions on several sites quite easily, but not being able to find statistics showing me the total number of wallets created, and what percentage of them are currently being used seems impossible. This is a massive issue in terms of transparency on the chain. > Transactions > For what its worth, the average transactions seems fairly consistent, but until I can see the number of wallets that are active, I have no way of knowing if any of these are real users, bots, or just staking rewards. > MARKETCAP DOMINANCE - Falling all year > Obviously the entire crypto asset class is down this year, but if you compare like for like, you can still get a sense of whether the token is holding up well or not. > The marketcap dominance for COSMOS is roughly half of what it was at the beginning of the year. Reaching a top of around 0.6 % of the Crypto market in February, it now sits at 0.3 %. All altcoins will lose dominance in a bear market, but you would want the crypto to hold its own in the class as much as possible. Dropping 50% is not a good thing. > The dominance picked up prior to the announcement of 2.0, but has since fallen away again. > Marketcap dominance > TOTAL VALUE LOCKED - Where is it? > This value helps understand how many people are staking COSMOS and in a sense how commited investors are to the project. Yet once again this is a figure that is difficult to ascertain. > According to DefiLlama, there is no reported TVL directly for the ATOM token. Once again, they list all the projects built on top of the blockchain. The bonded tokens provided on mintscan also seem to correlate to this value. The highest individual TVL seems to CRONOS or KAVA, but I personally dont believe the locked tokens on an individual project on a blockchain should count towards the TVL on another chain. This is not necessarily a bad thing about the TVL for the ecosystem, but it begs the question again, what is the point of holding the ATOM token? > DECENTRALISATION - Some validators have too much control of the network > There are currently \~175 validators which is gives a Nakamoto Co-efficient of just 7. This is roughly the same level of decentralisation as Binance and is a terrible score. COSMOS really needs to increase the numbers of validators quickly because the distribution of tokens across the staking validators is a significant risk. > Nakamoto Coefficient > BIGGEST COMPETITION - Polkadot still higher in most cases > All cryptos are essentially in some sort of competition with each other. Due to the rationale, goals and purpose the blockchain, the biggest competitor to COSMOS is likely POLKADOT. > Again, the crypto asset class is down, by comparing marketcap dominance, Polkadot is still more than double the marketcap of COSMOS. > While Polkadot actually has about half the number of validators as COSMOS, the staking mechanism results in a much better Nakamoto-Coefficient of 85. This means Polkadot is 12 times more decentralised than Cosmos. > \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\* > CONCLUSION: > Holding the ATOM token is pretty much only for speculation - you may get some free stuff or see the price rise. > TLDR: Just read the bold headlines ***** Would you like to learn more? Check out the [Cointest archive](/r/CointestOfficial/wiki/cointest_archive#wiki_Cosmos) to find submissions for other topics.

PhotonicDestroyer

There are SC platforms that look better long term though BUT IM NO SHILL!

CointestMod

#Cosmos Con-Arguments Below is a Cosmos con-argument written by gnarley_quinn. > > THE ANTI-SHILL FOR COSMOS: > INFLATION - Much too high. Staking rewards do not offset the supply increase. > There is a significant discrepancy between the inflation calculated by Messari and CoinMarketCap versus the stated inflation from the various Cosmos ecosystem scanners. > Whether it is because of some hidden lock mechanic for some tokens, and since these values are suppose to represent the circulating supply, it is not a good look for investors to have to justify why the stated inflation does not match the calculated one. > The staking rewards are averaged at 21.57% which is below the calculated inflation value, but above the stated inflation value. The staking rewards claimed on the COSMOS website also state the average APY is less than ten percent, which is significantly lower than the stated inflation. > There is a different incentive to holding which is airdrops. Depending on snapshots, you could get lucky with an airdrop that goes ballistic. > > > SOURCE INFLATION SUPPLY TODAY SUPPLY LAST YEAR > Messari 26.60 % 286,370,297 226,186,564 > Coinmarketcap 26.66 % 286,370,297 226,127,431 > Mintscan 13.82 % 313,077,417 Not provided > Atomscan 13.82 % Not provided Not provided > Cosmoscan 13.81 % 319,984,721.29 Not provided > UTILITY - Limited use. There is no reason to hold the token other than speculation > There is actually very little utility for the ATOM token. By staking ATOM, you are able to vote in Cosmos Hub governance decisions, but that is about it. There doesn't seem to be much reason to actually hold it other than it might go up or down and thus you could sell it. For context, other projects require their token to be used for fees or NFT sales. According to cryptofees, the COSMOS chain doesn't seem to actually make any money, the projects built on it do - which still doesn't seem to give a reason to hold ATOM. > DAILY ACTIVITY - It is a mystery! > Try as I might, I could not find statistics anywhere about how many addresses are actually being used on the COSMOS chain. To me, this is a massive red flag. I can find transactions on several sites quite easily, but not being able to find statistics showing me the total number of wallets created, and what percentage of them are currently being used seems impossible. This is a massive issue in terms of transparency on the chain. > Transactions > For what its worth, the average transactions seems fairly consistent, but until I can see the number of wallets that are active, I have no way of knowing if any of these are real users, bots, or just staking rewards. > MARKETCAP DOMINANCE - Falling all year > Obviously the entire crypto asset class is down this year, but if you compare like for like, you can still get a sense of whether the token is holding up well or not. > The marketcap dominance for COSMOS is roughly half of what it was at the beginning of the year. Reaching a top of around 0.6 % of the Crypto market in February, it now sits at 0.3 %. All altcoins will lose dominance in a bear market, but you would want the crypto to hold its own in the class as much as possible. Dropping 50% is not a good thing. > The dominance picked up prior to the announcement of 2.0, but has since fallen away again. > Marketcap dominance > TOTAL VALUE LOCKED - Where is it? > This value helps understand how many people are staking COSMOS and in a sense how commited investors are to the project. Yet once again this is a figure that is difficult to ascertain. > According to DefiLlama, there is no reported TVL directly for the ATOM token. Once again, they list all the projects built on top of the blockchain. The bonded tokens provided on mintscan also seem to correlate to this value. The highest individual TVL seems to CRONOS or KAVA, but I personally dont believe the locked tokens on an individual project on a blockchain should count towards the TVL on another chain. This is not necessarily a bad thing about the TVL for the ecosystem, but it begs the question again, what is the point of holding the ATOM token? > DECENTRALISATION - Some validators have too much control of the network > There are currently \~175 validators which is gives a Nakamoto Co-efficient of just 7. This is roughly the same level of decentralisation as Binance and is a terrible score. COSMOS really needs to increase the numbers of validators quickly because the distribution of tokens across the staking validators is a significant risk. > Nakamoto Coefficient > BIGGEST COMPETITION - Polkadot still higher in most cases > All cryptos are essentially in some sort of competition with each other. Due to the rationale, goals and purpose the blockchain, the biggest competitor to COSMOS is likely POLKADOT. > Again, the crypto asset class is down, by comparing marketcap dominance, Polkadot is still more than double the marketcap of COSMOS. > While Polkadot actually has about half the number of validators as COSMOS, the staking mechanism results in a much better Nakamoto-Coefficient of 85. This means Polkadot is 12 times more decentralised than Cosmos. > \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\* > CONCLUSION: > Holding the ATOM token is pretty much only for speculation - you may get some free stuff or see the price rise. > TLDR: Just read the bold headlines ***** Would you like to learn more? Check out the [Cointest archive](/r/CointestOfficial/wiki/cointest_archive#wiki_Cosmos) to find submissions for other topics.

rizen808

WATCH OUT FOR THIS USER \^\^\^\^ RIVER SHILL/EMPLOYEE trying to fly under the radar. RIVER MIGHT BE A SCAM, TONS OF BUYERS CANNOT MOVE ANY FUNDS OR BTC OUT OF THEIR SITE.

rizen808

WATCH OUT FOR THIS USER \^\^\^\^ RIVER SHILL/EMPLOYEE trying to fly under the radar. RIVER MIGHT BE A SCAM, TONS OF BUYERS CANNOT MOVE ANY FUNDS OR BTC OUT OF THEIR SITE.

CointestMod

#Cosmos Con-Arguments Below is a Cosmos con-argument written by gnarley_quinn. > > THE ANTI-SHILL FOR COSMOS: > INFLATION - Much too high. Staking rewards do not offset the supply increase. > There is a significant discrepancy between the inflation calculated by Messari and CoinMarketCap versus the stated inflation from the various Cosmos ecosystem scanners. > Whether it is because of some hidden lock mechanic for some tokens, and since these values are suppose to represent the circulating supply, it is not a good look for investors to have to justify why the stated inflation does not match the calculated one. > The staking rewards are averaged at 21.57% which is below the calculated inflation value, but above the stated inflation value. The staking rewards claimed on the COSMOS website also state the average APY is less than ten percent, which is significantly lower than the stated inflation. > There is a different incentive to holding which is airdrops. Depending on snapshots, you could get lucky with an airdrop that goes ballistic. > > > SOURCE INFLATION SUPPLY TODAY SUPPLY LAST YEAR > Messari 26.60 % 286,370,297 226,186,564 > Coinmarketcap 26.66 % 286,370,297 226,127,431 > Mintscan 13.82 % 313,077,417 Not provided > Atomscan 13.82 % Not provided Not provided > Cosmoscan 13.81 % 319,984,721.29 Not provided > UTILITY - Limited use. There is no reason to hold the token other than speculation > There is actually very little utility for the ATOM token. By staking ATOM, you are able to vote in Cosmos Hub governance decisions, but that is about it. There doesn't seem to be much reason to actually hold it other than it might go up or down and thus you could sell it. For context, other projects require their token to be used for fees or NFT sales. According to cryptofees, the COSMOS chain doesn't seem to actually make any money, the projects built on it do - which still doesn't seem to give a reason to hold ATOM. > DAILY ACTIVITY - It is a mystery! > Try as I might, I could not find statistics anywhere about how many addresses are actually being used on the COSMOS chain. To me, this is a massive red flag. I can find transactions on several sites quite easily, but not being able to find statistics showing me the total number of wallets created, and what percentage of them are currently being used seems impossible. This is a massive issue in terms of transparency on the chain. > Transactions > For what its worth, the average transactions seems fairly consistent, but until I can see the number of wallets that are active, I have no way of knowing if any of these are real users, bots, or just staking rewards. > MARKETCAP DOMINANCE - Falling all year > Obviously the entire crypto asset class is down this year, but if you compare like for like, you can still get a sense of whether the token is holding up well or not. > The marketcap dominance for COSMOS is roughly half of what it was at the beginning of the year. Reaching a top of around 0.6 % of the Crypto market in February, it now sits at 0.3 %. All altcoins will lose dominance in a bear market, but you would want the crypto to hold its own in the class as much as possible. Dropping 50% is not a good thing. > The dominance picked up prior to the announcement of 2.0, but has since fallen away again. > Marketcap dominance > TOTAL VALUE LOCKED - Where is it? > This value helps understand how many people are staking COSMOS and in a sense how commited investors are to the project. Yet once again this is a figure that is difficult to ascertain. > According to DefiLlama, there is no reported TVL directly for the ATOM token. Once again, they list all the projects built on top of the blockchain. The bonded tokens provided on mintscan also seem to correlate to this value. The highest individual TVL seems to CRONOS or KAVA, but I personally dont believe the locked tokens on an individual project on a blockchain should count towards the TVL on another chain. This is not necessarily a bad thing about the TVL for the ecosystem, but it begs the question again, what is the point of holding the ATOM token? > DECENTRALISATION - Some validators have too much control of the network > There are currently \~175 validators which is gives a Nakamoto Co-efficient of just 7. This is roughly the same level of decentralisation as Binance and is a terrible score. COSMOS really needs to increase the numbers of validators quickly because the distribution of tokens across the staking validators is a significant risk. > Nakamoto Coefficient > BIGGEST COMPETITION - Polkadot still higher in most cases > All cryptos are essentially in some sort of competition with each other. Due to the rationale, goals and purpose the blockchain, the biggest competitor to COSMOS is likely POLKADOT. > Again, the crypto asset class is down, by comparing marketcap dominance, Polkadot is still more than double the marketcap of COSMOS. > While Polkadot actually has about half the number of validators as COSMOS, the staking mechanism results in a much better Nakamoto-Coefficient of 85. This means Polkadot is 12 times more decentralised than Cosmos. > \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\* > CONCLUSION: > Holding the ATOM token is pretty much only for speculation - you may get some free stuff or see the price rise. > TLDR: Just read the bold headlines ***** Would you like to learn more? Check out the [Cointest archive](/r/CointestOfficial/wiki/cointest_archive#wiki_Cosmos) to find submissions for other topics.

CointestMod

#Cosmos Con-Arguments Below is a Cosmos con-argument written by gnarley_quinn. > > THE ANTI-SHILL FOR COSMOS: > INFLATION - Much too high. Staking rewards do not offset the supply increase. > There is a significant discrepancy between the inflation calculated by Messari and CoinMarketCap versus the stated inflation from the various Cosmos ecosystem scanners. > Whether it is because of some hidden lock mechanic for some tokens, and since these values are suppose to represent the circulating supply, it is not a good look for investors to have to justify why the stated inflation does not match the calculated one. > The staking rewards are averaged at 21.57% which is below the calculated inflation value, but above the stated inflation value. The staking rewards claimed on the COSMOS website also state the average APY is less than ten percent, which is significantly lower than the stated inflation. > There is a different incentive to holding which is airdrops. Depending on snapshots, you could get lucky with an airdrop that goes ballistic. > > > SOURCE INFLATION SUPPLY TODAY SUPPLY LAST YEAR > Messari 26.60 % 286,370,297 226,186,564 > Coinmarketcap 26.66 % 286,370,297 226,127,431 > Mintscan 13.82 % 313,077,417 Not provided > Atomscan 13.82 % Not provided Not provided > Cosmoscan 13.81 % 319,984,721.29 Not provided > UTILITY - Limited use. There is no reason to hold the token other than speculation > There is actually very little utility for the ATOM token. By staking ATOM, you are able to vote in Cosmos Hub governance decisions, but that is about it. There doesn't seem to be much reason to actually hold it other than it might go up or down and thus you could sell it. For context, other projects require their token to be used for fees or NFT sales. According to cryptofees, the COSMOS chain doesn't seem to actually make any money, the projects built on it do - which still doesn't seem to give a reason to hold ATOM. > DAILY ACTIVITY - It is a mystery! > Try as I might, I could not find statistics anywhere about how many addresses are actually being used on the COSMOS chain. To me, this is a massive red flag. I can find transactions on several sites quite easily, but not being able to find statistics showing me the total number of wallets created, and what percentage of them are currently being used seems impossible. This is a massive issue in terms of transparency on the chain. > Transactions > For what its worth, the average transactions seems fairly consistent, but until I can see the number of wallets that are active, I have no way of knowing if any of these are real users, bots, or just staking rewards. > MARKETCAP DOMINANCE - Falling all year > Obviously the entire crypto asset class is down this year, but if you compare like for like, you can still get a sense of whether the token is holding up well or not. > The marketcap dominance for COSMOS is roughly half of what it was at the beginning of the year. Reaching a top of around 0.6 % of the Crypto market in February, it now sits at 0.3 %. All altcoins will lose dominance in a bear market, but you would want the crypto to hold its own in the class as much as possible. Dropping 50% is not a good thing. > The dominance picked up prior to the announcement of 2.0, but has since fallen away again. > Marketcap dominance > TOTAL VALUE LOCKED - Where is it? > This value helps understand how many people are staking COSMOS and in a sense how commited investors are to the project. Yet once again this is a figure that is difficult to ascertain. > According to DefiLlama, there is no reported TVL directly for the ATOM token. Once again, they list all the projects built on top of the blockchain. The bonded tokens provided on mintscan also seem to correlate to this value. The highest individual TVL seems to CRONOS or KAVA, but I personally dont believe the locked tokens on an individual project on a blockchain should count towards the TVL on another chain. This is not necessarily a bad thing about the TVL for the ecosystem, but it begs the question again, what is the point of holding the ATOM token? > DECENTRALISATION - Some validators have too much control of the network > There are currently \~175 validators which is gives a Nakamoto Co-efficient of just 7. This is roughly the same level of decentralisation as Binance and is a terrible score. COSMOS really needs to increase the numbers of validators quickly because the distribution of tokens across the staking validators is a significant risk. > Nakamoto Coefficient > BIGGEST COMPETITION - Polkadot still higher in most cases > All cryptos are essentially in some sort of competition with each other. Due to the rationale, goals and purpose the blockchain, the biggest competitor to COSMOS is likely POLKADOT. > Again, the crypto asset class is down, by comparing marketcap dominance, Polkadot is still more than double the marketcap of COSMOS. > While Polkadot actually has about half the number of validators as COSMOS, the staking mechanism results in a much better Nakamoto-Coefficient of 85. This means Polkadot is 12 times more decentralised than Cosmos. > \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\* > CONCLUSION: > Holding the ATOM token is pretty much only for speculation - you may get some free stuff or see the price rise. > TLDR: Just read the bold headlines ***** Would you like to learn more? Check out the [Cointest archive](/r/CointestOfficial/wiki/cointest_archive#wiki_Cosmos) to find submissions for other topics.

CointestMod

#Cosmos Con-Arguments Below is a Cosmos con-argument written by gnarley_quinn. > > THE ANTI-SHILL FOR COSMOS: > INFLATION - Much too high. Staking rewards do not offset the supply increase. > There is a significant discrepancy between the inflation calculated by Messari and CoinMarketCap versus the stated inflation from the various Cosmos ecosystem scanners. > Whether it is because of some hidden lock mechanic for some tokens, and since these values are suppose to represent the circulating supply, it is not a good look for investors to have to justify why the stated inflation does not match the calculated one. > The staking rewards are averaged at 21.57% which is below the calculated inflation value, but above the stated inflation value. The staking rewards claimed on the COSMOS website also state the average APY is less than ten percent, which is significantly lower than the stated inflation. > There is a different incentive to holding which is airdrops. Depending on snapshots, you could get lucky with an airdrop that goes ballistic. > > > SOURCE INFLATION SUPPLY TODAY SUPPLY LAST YEAR > Messari 26.60 % 286,370,297 226,186,564 > Coinmarketcap 26.66 % 286,370,297 226,127,431 > Mintscan 13.82 % 313,077,417 Not provided > Atomscan 13.82 % Not provided Not provided > Cosmoscan 13.81 % 319,984,721.29 Not provided > UTILITY - Limited use. There is no reason to hold the token other than speculation > There is actually very little utility for the ATOM token. By staking ATOM, you are able to vote in Cosmos Hub governance decisions, but that is about it. There doesn't seem to be much reason to actually hold it other than it might go up or down and thus you could sell it. For context, other projects require their token to be used for fees or NFT sales. According to cryptofees, the COSMOS chain doesn't seem to actually make any money, the projects built on it do - which still doesn't seem to give a reason to hold ATOM. > DAILY ACTIVITY - It is a mystery! > Try as I might, I could not find statistics anywhere about how many addresses are actually being used on the COSMOS chain. To me, this is a massive red flag. I can find transactions on several sites quite easily, but not being able to find statistics showing me the total number of wallets created, and what percentage of them are currently being used seems impossible. This is a massive issue in terms of transparency on the chain. > Transactions > For what its worth, the average transactions seems fairly consistent, but until I can see the number of wallets that are active, I have no way of knowing if any of these are real users, bots, or just staking rewards. > MARKETCAP DOMINANCE - Falling all year > Obviously the entire crypto asset class is down this year, but if you compare like for like, you can still get a sense of whether the token is holding up well or not. > The marketcap dominance for COSMOS is roughly half of what it was at the beginning of the year. Reaching a top of around 0.6 % of the Crypto market in February, it now sits at 0.3 %. All altcoins will lose dominance in a bear market, but you would want the crypto to hold its own in the class as much as possible. Dropping 50% is not a good thing. > The dominance picked up prior to the announcement of 2.0, but has since fallen away again. > Marketcap dominance > TOTAL VALUE LOCKED - Where is it? > This value helps understand how many people are staking COSMOS and in a sense how commited investors are to the project. Yet once again this is a figure that is difficult to ascertain. > According to DefiLlama, there is no reported TVL directly for the ATOM token. Once again, they list all the projects built on top of the blockchain. The bonded tokens provided on mintscan also seem to correlate to this value. The highest individual TVL seems to CRONOS or KAVA, but I personally dont believe the locked tokens on an individual project on a blockchain should count towards the TVL on another chain. This is not necessarily a bad thing about the TVL for the ecosystem, but it begs the question again, what is the point of holding the ATOM token? > DECENTRALISATION - Some validators have too much control of the network > There are currently \~175 validators which is gives a Nakamoto Co-efficient of just 7. This is roughly the same level of decentralisation as Binance and is a terrible score. COSMOS really needs to increase the numbers of validators quickly because the distribution of tokens across the staking validators is a significant risk. > Nakamoto Coefficient > BIGGEST COMPETITION - Polkadot still higher in most cases > All cryptos are essentially in some sort of competition with each other. Due to the rationale, goals and purpose the blockchain, the biggest competitor to COSMOS is likely POLKADOT. > Again, the crypto asset class is down, by comparing marketcap dominance, Polkadot is still more than double the marketcap of COSMOS. > While Polkadot actually has about half the number of validators as COSMOS, the staking mechanism results in a much better Nakamoto-Coefficient of 85. This means Polkadot is 12 times more decentralised than Cosmos. > \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\* > CONCLUSION: > Holding the ATOM token is pretty much only for speculation - you may get some free stuff or see the price rise. > TLDR: Just read the bold headlines ***** Would you like to learn more? Check out the [Cointest archive](/r/CointestOfficial/wiki/cointest_archive#wiki_Cosmos) to find submissions for other topics.

CointestMod

#Cosmos Con-Arguments Below is a Cosmos con-argument written by gnarley_quinn. > > THE ANTI-SHILL FOR COSMOS: > INFLATION - Much too high. Staking rewards do not offset the supply increase. > There is a significant discrepancy between the inflation calculated by Messari and CoinMarketCap versus the stated inflation from the various Cosmos ecosystem scanners. > Whether it is because of some hidden lock mechanic for some tokens, and since these values are suppose to represent the circulating supply, it is not a good look for investors to have to justify why the stated inflation does not match the calculated one. > The staking rewards are averaged at 21.57% which is below the calculated inflation value, but above the stated inflation value. The staking rewards claimed on the COSMOS website also state the average APY is less than ten percent, which is significantly lower than the stated inflation. > There is a different incentive to holding which is airdrops. Depending on snapshots, you could get lucky with an airdrop that goes ballistic. > > > SOURCE INFLATION SUPPLY TODAY SUPPLY LAST YEAR > Messari 26.60 % 286,370,297 226,186,564 > Coinmarketcap 26.66 % 286,370,297 226,127,431 > Mintscan 13.82 % 313,077,417 Not provided > Atomscan 13.82 % Not provided Not provided > Cosmoscan 13.81 % 319,984,721.29 Not provided > UTILITY - Limited use. There is no reason to hold the token other than speculation > There is actually very little utility for the ATOM token. By staking ATOM, you are able to vote in Cosmos Hub governance decisions, but that is about it. There doesn't seem to be much reason to actually hold it other than it might go up or down and thus you could sell it. For context, other projects require their token to be used for fees or NFT sales. According to cryptofees, the COSMOS chain doesn't seem to actually make any money, the projects built on it do - which still doesn't seem to give a reason to hold ATOM. > DAILY ACTIVITY - It is a mystery! > Try as I might, I could not find statistics anywhere about how many addresses are actually being used on the COSMOS chain. To me, this is a massive red flag. I can find transactions on several sites quite easily, but not being able to find statistics showing me the total number of wallets created, and what percentage of them are currently being used seems impossible. This is a massive issue in terms of transparency on the chain. > Transactions > For what its worth, the average transactions seems fairly consistent, but until I can see the number of wallets that are active, I have no way of knowing if any of these are real users, bots, or just staking rewards. > MARKETCAP DOMINANCE - Falling all year > Obviously the entire crypto asset class is down this year, but if you compare like for like, you can still get a sense of whether the token is holding up well or not. > The marketcap dominance for COSMOS is roughly half of what it was at the beginning of the year. Reaching a top of around 0.6 % of the Crypto market in February, it now sits at 0.3 %. All altcoins will lose dominance in a bear market, but you would want the crypto to hold its own in the class as much as possible. Dropping 50% is not a good thing. > The dominance picked up prior to the announcement of 2.0, but has since fallen away again. > Marketcap dominance > TOTAL VALUE LOCKED - Where is it? > This value helps understand how many people are staking COSMOS and in a sense how commited investors are to the project. Yet once again this is a figure that is difficult to ascertain. > According to DefiLlama, there is no reported TVL directly for the ATOM token. Once again, they list all the projects built on top of the blockchain. The bonded tokens provided on mintscan also seem to correlate to this value. The highest individual TVL seems to CRONOS or KAVA, but I personally dont believe the locked tokens on an individual project on a blockchain should count towards the TVL on another chain. This is not necessarily a bad thing about the TVL for the ecosystem, but it begs the question again, what is the point of holding the ATOM token? > DECENTRALISATION - Some validators have too much control of the network > There are currently \~175 validators which is gives a Nakamoto Co-efficient of just 7. This is roughly the same level of decentralisation as Binance and is a terrible score. COSMOS really needs to increase the numbers of validators quickly because the distribution of tokens across the staking validators is a significant risk. > Nakamoto Coefficient > BIGGEST COMPETITION - Polkadot still higher in most cases > All cryptos are essentially in some sort of competition with each other. Due to the rationale, goals and purpose the blockchain, the biggest competitor to COSMOS is likely POLKADOT. > Again, the crypto asset class is down, by comparing marketcap dominance, Polkadot is still more than double the marketcap of COSMOS. > While Polkadot actually has about half the number of validators as COSMOS, the staking mechanism results in a much better Nakamoto-Coefficient of 85. This means Polkadot is 12 times more decentralised than Cosmos. > \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\* > CONCLUSION: > Holding the ATOM token is pretty much only for speculation - you may get some free stuff or see the price rise. > TLDR: Just read the bold headlines ***** Would you like to learn more? Check out the [Cointest archive](/r/CointestOfficial/wiki/cointest_archive#wiki_Cosmos) to find submissions for other topics.

Lokiee0077

I once created my account at Kucoin to Buy a shitcoin named "$SHILL".

Every_Hunt_160

But if it's a way to control the population even more, and a way to centralise power like CBDCs? SHILL !

WineMakerBg

You have a point. There is only one active banner. It's meant to be used by a business entity. \[SHILL\] tag will serve as an increased market demand and increase banner cost. (more demand - higher price).

Every_Hunt_160

Always remember: The ‘Crypto influencer’ doesn’t actually do any research, he is just a PAID SHILL that is sponsored to shill you the project YOU are the product that is making the yield for the Scam-fluencer, he is not trying to make you money.

WineMakerBg

What A SHILL Sherpa is.

legionticket

Welcome to "LET ME SHILL MY BAGS" comments

Dull-Wear-3286

ASSEMBLE SHILLERS, SHILL YOUR COINS GUYS. Good luck.

goodlife123456

SHILL fam. History repeats itself! $SSB

NoKnowledgeKnow

Says who? OMG A SPELLING MISTAKE HE IS A SHILL.

amartinkyle

Lol I’m going to keep checking the price of this, and it’s most certainly going to be less. SHILL HARDER SHILL HARDER SHILL HARDER

noob_zarathustra

Instructions unclear: buying boatload of $SHILL

DingDongWhoDis

Because the cries of SHILL and CENTRALIZED and SCAM drown us out. I'm still stacking. I don't care about the noise.

ChainSentence

Thanks, i will look into that later. And in my defense, im holding LTC, do you know how easy it is to use Litewallet? (SHILL)

Oldz88Rz

If they ask about it first though then “SHILL BABY SHILL!!”

Sad_Entertainer9961

Time to SHILL guys! I’ll go with MOONS

marocbrm2

please SHILL me your TOP coins !

lackaboughs

AHAHAHAHA I FUCKING KNEW YOU WERE A SHILL! Enjoy holding those soon to be worthless fucking bags, LMAO. Jesus fucking Christ, if I had a dollar for every project with a nice whitepaper that eventually went tits up, I'd be fucking rich. Fucking trash "argument". AHAHAHAHA

TIMEWUMBO

SHILL

already_night

(This comment section is depressing. About 10% have read the rules of what they have to do, 90% just comment shit. OP said SHILL your favorite coin. Yet you have people who can't even grasp simple concepts and would comment anything for moons. I came here ready to have some fun reading comments and there's nothing to read almost.)

sproutsatoshi

SHILL! 😄 🤣

yuruseiii

My gem: $SHILL. It goes up by 1% every time someone shills their latest 'crypto gem'

tazcharts

SHILL

Frogmangy

Ready set SHILL!

Which-Ad-9338

SHILL because of its grassroots, community-based marketing

Paulymcnasty

Yall are some hardcore conspiracy therioists if i've ever seen some. All i did was ask if it was a scam or not and "SHILL, SHILL,SHILL," yall need a hug or something.

rhinoccult

I’m gonna be the first one to say this “SHILL ME A LOW MARKETCAP COIN!!!!” (Not really, just haven’t seen those words in a long tim)

ugohome

*ROLLS DICE ON REASON TO SHILL 'LITECOIN'* >marketcap

ugohome

*ROLLS DICE ON REASON TO SHILL 'ADA'* >imaginary hospital that will accept crypto >imaginary upgrades >imaginary hydra

ugohome

*ROLLS DICE ON REASON TO SHILL 'ADA'* >whales buying back >Hydra

ugohome

*ROLLS DICE ON REASON TO SHILL 'ANKR' > showing a little life down there

SerFraust

CNBC is a hedge fund owned SHILL factory. If you believe anything from there, you deserve to lose your money.

gnarley_quinn

Wait till you see the Polygon ANTI-SHILL I 've been writing....

TrifBoi

The SHILL

szerted

Definitely love ANTI-SHILL series! Keep up the great work! It's always nice seeing such quality content in here, helps learning step by step

gnarley_quinn

Remember the point of an ANTI-SHILL is to try and make it sound like there project is not worth investing. There is no way I could provide data backed evidence with a negative perspective on something that hasn’t happened yet.

gnarley_quinn

Well that didn't take long, how many others want to see a Polygon ANTI-SHILL ?

Trylks

Well… you should not have done that. I hope it was decentralized and not FTX related. There are many companies and brands adopting crypto and NFTs, start with that. Then finish with Zuckerberg, he made Facebook, boomers love Facebook. Surely your brother in law doesn't have a comparable net worth, expertise,… **DON'T SHILL THE METAVERSE** Just mention it, and distract the attention about how the top 1% and the bottom 99% have different _perspectives_ about the future of technology. Time will tell who is right…

KnackeredParrot

Happy to give OP the benefit of the doubt if a newbie. Just my sceptical radar was pinging. There have _literally_ been hundreds of posts where someone says I need X that can do A B C. I haven't found any that can except SHILL. If they then ask for more it's usually because they know others don't exist.

Electronic_Emu_7975

what did you not understand when I said CALLED SHILL GROUP?

beepbeepdip

OP is like an assassin, lurking in the shadows, waiting for the right time.. the right time to SHILL!

0ysterhead

$SHILL

SmallReflection2552

Article title should read: BTC price struggles at $21K as CRYPTO INFLUENCER AND SHILL says 'top is in' for Bitcoin, Ethereum

kirtash93

Don't forget FOMO and SHILL.

The_Chorizo_Bandit

Shill? SHILL?! I resent the accusation! I’m merely a simple krak pusher ma’am.

MaximumStudent1839

You are too emotionally attached to your investment. And don't shill crypto at workplace. Nothing good comes from it. In fact, DON'T SHILL AT ALL. Educate them if you want to learn. Don't shove it in their face if they don't care. Shoving things down people's throats is an absolutely annoying behavior - regardless of the topic.

marocbrm2

SHILL me your top performing coins this bearish week

marocbrm2

SHILL me your top coins please

Siliconb3ach

NICE TRY TIN SHILL!! 

GhostOfMcAfee

Which coin? BTC? ETH? ALGO? MATIC? Somebody comes along and finds a way to unite those chains and your response is to holler SHILL!. But for which one. Your non-responsive reply is sad. If you have a substantive response, give it. I literally asked if any other chain, anywhere, had a similar solution. Your response is to just post alternating fonts that call me a shill. That is not how reasonable people discuss topics.

111ThatGuy111

Knock Knock Who's there? SHIBA IN SHIBA IN WHO? SHILL!!

NoMaans

Mentions rocketpool once in the sentence. *SHILL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!* what? Dude gave a separate answer to other dude's situation. Thats like: "Hey where is a good spot to get ice cream?" *"oh, Millie's down the street is good"* "Why you shilling your ice cream at me bro?"

Inviction_

Buying SHILL at $13 and $18 Goodbye $1200

pavanaher9999

red_square to complete the QUIZ quests, find the answers by reading the ABOUT section on Pianity.com/about sirenblue find all the HELP and informations you need here : https://help.pianity.com/hc/en-us blue_square to complete the SHILL quest, find another discord server thant this one and post in their SHILL channel - then take a screenshot and claim your XP gem to get your XP converted to $PIA at the end of this CREW3 sprint (Aug,31) you'll need to completed and validate THE CONVERTER quest all people validating this quest will get their XP converted to $PIA alert if you want to get the @verified role, just create an account on Pianity.com and link your Discord account (the same you are using to connect on Crew3) in "settings" / then you can also validate and claim "The Merge" quest

PostalAzul

Yet again another Algo SHILL post

jadedhomeowner

You SHILL have hope I see.

captain257843489

Don't underestimate the power of a great gem #Goaty $GOATY is launching soon This project has got all it takes to make you financially free.. ✅BUSD REWARDS💰🪙 ✅BASED DEVS🧑‍🔬 ✅DEDICATED ADMINS🧑‍💻 ✅BEST SHILL ARMY 🥷 t.me/GoatyArmy

captain257843489

Don't underestimate the power of a great gem #Goaty $GOATY is launching soon This project has got all it takes to make you financially free.. ✅BUSD REWARDS💰🪙 ✅BASED DEVS🧑‍🔬 ✅DEDICATED ADMINS🧑‍💻 ✅BEST SHILL ARMY 🥷 t.me/GoatyArmy

captain6789665788

Don't underestimate the power of a great gem #Goaty $GOATY is launching soon This project has got all it takes to make you financially free.. ✅BUSD REWARDS💰🪙 ✅BASED DEVS🧑‍🔬 ✅DEDICATED ADMINS🧑‍💻 ✅BEST SHILL ARMY 🥷 t.me/GoatyArmy

Castr0-

We have to put things clear. Or is a FUD or is a SHILL. No mid terms.

puckmugger

THEY COMING FOR THE YOUTUBE AND DISCORD SHILL TRADING GROUPS!! 😂 When you realize Google owns YouTube and Microsoft owns Discord and they hoard data using their ToS and EULA... 🤣😂🤣

Extravagos

Didn't take me long to find an ALGO mention. Love me some ALGO!! (I AM NOT AN ALGO SHILL...I JUST REALLY LOVE ALGO)

One_Common7717

Current state of the economy=brink of a recession. Former fed chairman who led us into QE with no remorse, makes comment on btc. Are we speculating that this guy has anything worth listening to? Im curious why this is here? SHILL. ?

maystor_99

rofl, another shit SHILL post. But this is shill for major shit coin - BitCON. These crypto guys are delusional. Bitcoin is useless. Its useless as P2P cash as your jesus Satoshi Nakamoto have written in his fake bibble. So when that ship has sailed, bitcon con mans, promote it as a store of value. With that it fails also. It doesnt store value at all, store of value means things like gold ya know - gold is store of value cause its liquid and you can withdraw it without 50x losses or wins, and it keeps solid pace with inflation: thats the fucking point of store of value. So, PARDON me, its not completely useless. It has its use as a massive pump and dump scheme offering nothing as an asset, but hey, its offering insiders massive profits. Exchanges are fixed with its fake bitcoins synthetic price. Rarity argument is hilarious. Just cause its rare it doesnt mean nothing without having any value, and bitcoin does not have any value. You may try to respond like - hey it has value cause people believe in it. No, people dont believe in it, they know its shitcoin, they want to make money on it, again, profit calculated in US dollars or other FIAT currency which you spend on everyday things. Only if you count its value from massive electricity consumed, then it has value - useless electricity spent lol. Even as your jesus satoshi wrote in his paper the way he visioned bitcon as a P2P cash, bitcon FAILS on every single aspect of it since cash transactions are also free and anonymus and never permanently stored on a public ledger lol. Dorks gonna reply now, lightning network durr durr... another con. Nobody is going to lift bitcons node and open layers and channels. Maybe in 1992. Not in 2022. So yea, bitcoin was fun in 1992 when you connected with dial ups and shit. Self claim fixe of the corrupt banking and political system - turns out to be even worse. Even worse in a sense it gives people hope. You need me to embrace that piece of shit technology so you can unload your bags on the next sucker in line. Cause none of yall believe in that crap. You just keep building your sect so you can unload your bitcoin onto them, and they can unload on to the other, etc. etc. And thats the sort of people i really dont like - bullshit sellers. At least be a man and have balls to say "Yes, I am a part of that bullshit seller script which sells you bullshit for 50 000 dollars ". Thats cool. But to be a dirty piece of shit bullshit seller. Pathetic. Would love to meet ya in real life pricks. PS. I didnt loose any money on Luna and I'm not pissed off, just real. Im here for those who might buy this bullshit con story and loose their money. NOBODY ACCEPTS BITCON, neither will they ever, but - EVERYBODY DOES CASH. ​ And Im gonna bookmark this post and make back up of it, just so I dont have to type against this bullshit sellers again, copy paste is easier :) Have a nice day.

MaximumStudent1839

This is so fucking hopeless. NOT EVERYTHING SEC DOES IS BAD!!! Nvidia is a bunch of liars to say GPU mining is not a significant part of their revenue. They are MISLEADING their shareholders that the upcoming ETH merge has no significant impact on their profit. You know it is all hogwash once you see scalpers dropping GPU prices as the ETH difficulty bomb approaches in summer. Crypto is about revolting against Big Boys cheating out everyone with their deficits. Don't SHILL for these criminals!!!!!

Co60

>we are all paid by bank to spread FUD. Wait, you guys get real money? I've just been getting SHILL token.

irfiisme

I'll leave my sense of ego out and ask, ​ SHILL ME SOME M'FKNG 100x COINS!