YES

Impressive_Pilot8415

$SOL YES, $RNDR NO. Good luck.

Dottie__Hinkle

Would you take the $300 to a casino? If so, HODL this for years and perhaps you can thank him then if it goes 🚀 This $300 will be a good teacher. And YES! The up and down is absolutely normal Don’t stress it If a bee farts, the price will move swiftly No rhyme no reason so just hold for as long as you can afford to.

Agreeable-Sleep-1589

YES!

RiceMofo

YES. If this doesn’t convince you then try NO

IPconfigEARTH

YES!

Just_Avocado2761

YES there is app where you can meet locals, its called CryptoLocal but till now only on android

AutoModerator

Post is by: Ok-Mud7765 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1r151jp/ocp_onchain_consensus_protocol_lite/ A short overview for discussion. Full whitepaper and mechanism details are available separately. # One-liner If Bitcoin gave us value on-chain, OCP aims to give us facts on-chain—a permissionless layer to turn real-world disputes into programmable, finalized on-chain consensus, without oracles or a single authority. # The gap we’re targeting Real-world questions (“who won?”, “did it happen?”) are hard to get as trustworthy, programmable finality on-chain. Oracles add a single point of failure; on-chain courts often decouple consensus from capital; prediction markets still lean on external settlement. The “last mile” of consensus—bringing a dispute on-chain and resolving it irreversibly—is still messy. # Core idea * Consensus as a settleable asset. OCP is a thin protocol layer: anyone can bring a binary dispute on-chain; the protocol finalizes it through a stake–challenge game. * Proof of Commitment (POC). Authority comes from verifiable capital at risk, not identity or claims. We don’t assume people tell the truth; we assume being wrong is expensive. * Three outcomes: YES, NO, or INVALID (event cancelled / unverifiable / ambiguous). INVALID works as a circuit breaker and refunds everyone instead of forcing a binary result. Output is Finalized Consensus—one canonical on-chain fact per event that contracts and other apps can read. We frame it as “capital-confidence”: what outcome capital is willing to lock in, not a claim about objective truth. # Why it might matter for Ethereum * Oracle-free prediction markets and other apps that need “fact finality” without a central data source. * Optimistic-style governance: propose by staking; default pass unless someone stakes to challenge. * Sync / L2 context: as execution gets faster, “is the input true?” remains slow. OCP is designed so consensus can be referenced at “same-speed” for atomic flows (economic pre-finality, INVALID as a circuit breaker when facts are ambiguous). * Longer-term: a programmable layer for “value on-chain”—not only facts but preferences and alignment targets—readable by contracts and agents. # What we’re not claiming We’re not claiming OCP outputs “truth.” It outputs consensus that was expensive to form and to challenge—which is what many applications need. It works best for publicly verifiable, time-bounded events; edge cases (non-verifiable info, heavy ideology, no one willing to challenge) can produce “expensive errors.” That’s the intended design boundary. Happy to discuss design tradeoffs, L2/composability use cases, or integration ideas in the thread. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

shadowfax888

By them you mean my life fall faster. YES SIR buying more now 🫡🔥🧨

KateR_H0l1day

# YES

angelwolf71885

If you bought on an exchange like Coinbase or Robinhood then YES BTC is very traceable CB requires an ID and photo of your face to send coins and you gotta submit the same to get an account and RH requires them to sign up so you can be traced toa specific wallet and the sent to wallet can be tracked from there so even if the coins leave the exchange into “ self custody “ they can still be tracked and tied to you

moonkingdome

Sure. Could your dog become president sure.. Can pigs fly.. Urghhh.. Did stellantis just lose 20+% in value YES. Did silver drop 45+% in this year. YES the market is going down all over..

SecureWriting8589

#YES

BlueChipCryptos

YES. Before March 31. There is also a date in the video

SnooMaps8507

YES

biba8163

Reminder that BMNR investors voted YES to increasing the number of shares from 500 Million to 50 BILLION.

Loose_Development_24

Solana from 91 to 84 in one hour. YES!

TupacAmuru88

YES

Fun_Barracuda_1421

if you are asking for clarification whether you are extra stupid on reddit, the answer is YES

IPconfigEARTH

It has happend to many people... But you see, millions of people get scammed, barely some speak up... No one shares their mistakes... They wont get insta likes... hahah.... YES! It happened to me... And the story is about come backs!

Blueberry_Dependent

Double YES

Blueberry_Dependent

Who told you I'm selling. For me BTC is like a ticket to a better old age future. I don't see it as quick getting rich thing. I won't get rich now or in 10 years but maybe after 30 years it will be a good financial cushion supporting the small pension which I will get. Do I care about price -YES, why - Because I want to buy more sats with less fiat. This is the goal. As the price goes down more I buy more (or as much as I can financially) , as the price goes up I buy less and less

AutoModerator

Post is by: Glittering_Tax3904 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: https://zarub.io/?ysclid=ml5hm3yug8522639914 **Zarub is a SCAM. They mislead users and profit from fees.** I’m writing this to warn others. On **January 17, 2026**, I wanted to pay for a pair of shoes from a specific online store. That store did not accept my crypto card. I contacted Zarub support in advance and asked a very clear and specific question: **is it possible to pay on this particular website** (I included the link). Support replied clearly and unambiguously — **YES, payment is possible**. After that, I: * opened an account with Zarub * transferred USDT (with fees) * paid Zarub’s service fees * paid to open a Zarub card And immediately after that it turned out that payment was **impossible** — the transaction simply wouldn’t go through. I contacted support, sent a screenshot, and asked what the problem was. They suggested “trying a VPN” (didn’t help) and said the issue was passed to a technical specialist. Then the classic scam behavior started: * **2 days** — silence, I remind them * **5 days** — silence again, I remind them * then suddenly they ask me to send my **ID** so they can forward the request to a technical specialist ❓ **What were you doing for the previous 5 days?** I send the ID — again, no response. On **January 25** (already **8 days later**) they write that the request was “duplicated” and I need to “wait”. Another **3 days** pass, and I directly ask: 👉 **If payment is not possible — refund all my funds.** Only then, **after 11 days**, they reply: > So: * first they assured me that payment was **definitely possible** * I spent money on fees and card issuance * they dragged things out for 11 days * and in the end: “most likely, we can’t” But that’s not all. To get **my own money back**, Zarub demands an additional **$8 withdrawal fee**, on top of: * transfer fees * service fees * card issuance cost I told them directly: * the card was opened **ONLY** because of their assurances * I don’t need it for any other purpose * I was misled and they simply made money off me I demanded a **full refund**. Five days later, they replied that they can refund the money **minus all fees**, meaning **more than 20%** of the transferred amount would be lost. **Conclusion:** Zarub either doesn’t understand how its own service works, or knowingly lies to customers to profit from fees. Either way — **stay away from them**. If anyone needs it, I have **all the proof** — screenshots of the correspondence are available via DM. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

Bakkerrs

Answer is ALWAYS YES!

JustLTFD

How short sighted are you? You should be saying "YES" because in 3 years he runs out of money. You can't say NO because he has 3 years of money worth. In reality that's only for dividend payments and doesn't include large debts that are coming due. He also wants to keep the cash fund with cash in it to keep people buying his preferreds. He's got 1-1.5 years before he starts selling

uncapchad

1. Do not answer DMs or take any advice, help, follow links etc from private chats 2. If you plug the Nano in does it power up? Do you remember the PIN that you set on your Ledger? If NO, you'll have to go through a recovery process with the 24 words. Post a comment and someone will tell you how to go about that. 3. If YES then * Download the official Ledger Live app from https://www.ledger.com/ledger-live. * Connect your Ledger Nano device via USB. * Pass the genuine check (device verifies it’s authentic). * Enter your **PIN** to unlock the device.  * Once unlocked, Ledger Live will **automatically detect your accounts** and display your balances — no seed phrase required.  * ✅ **Important**: Never enter your seed phrase on your computer. If any app asks for it, it’s a scam. The seed phrase should **only** be entered directly on your Ledger device during setup or recovery. 

TheAudacityofHopium

Does cashapp allow withdrawals? I looked and I don't see an option to with mine, which I've had for months. By the way, message to OP: YES you can do it. If you buy a bit of Bitcoin from a peer then you can start using that in the application called Bisq as escrow to buy much more. The key is to find a way to get non-KYC Bitcoin now and then use it properly to get even more later. Issue with Bisq is that you do need a bank account with something like Wise, Revolut, or Zelle. I don't know how you'd manage that, TBH, but if you have access to one of those, then accumulating Bitcoin should, in theory, be possible for a minor.

dca-bot

YES

DustyReboot

Legally it’s often not classified as gambling, BUT it’s a form of speculative betting AND it hits the same dopamine circuits as gambling. So YES, it is!

whitehotpro

"Are you just living day to day? Are you lost and confused? 'I want to feel alive!' It's easy. You can't think about the past. 'Why did I do that?' It'll just turn to anger. You also can't think about the future. 'Will it be okay?' It just turns to worry. In that case, hold on for dear life! Stake your entire life on the HERE and NOW! YES! If you stake your life now, you will be alive!"

Ztoxed

Yes, its gambling. Simple answer. Anyone tells you a hype answer they are fabricating. Might as well use a slot machine. YES: I Have CRYPTO, But I am not delusional in seeing this as and investment op. Its a huge risk, and risks can be fun. But you can not measure anything to determine a outcome. Those on Youtube, get lucky, no one knows the direction. If they did, the stock market would close and a better option chosen.

Fox_0693

While YES it is true that, at the age of 14 I did watch the Man That Saw Tomorrow, narrated by Orson Wells While I have struggled with the super-natural - aka ghost and what not I find it hard to believe in such things I am a man of proof - and more proof and if you think there is no more proof THEN you must go find more because there is always more proof until there is truly none. I believe that - I found \[indescribable really\] - I just don't know how to prove it. I do not believe a man can predict the future - at all But I also do not discredit Nostradamus I do believe that a modern man can find educated guess and then investigate those 'alleged findings' If nothing turns up dig harder before you give up. If nothing is there - remember - most things appear to be hidden in very plain sight You could be right at it and all the while, look right past it. He is a man He is a mimic He does bleed ................................and he/they can be stopped but I do not know how to do it without being laughed at - not being taken seriously and then - ............................................................................................ \[a moment of silence\] ................and will SOMEBODY PLEASE!!!! Tell Tom Hanks that I didn't lose my joy - \- it was taken from me. \-SYS- save your souls p.s. - this is EAR TH - the listening place A place where gods come to whisper, talk, and to scream

Fox_0693

I would like to comment to the person that made the Nostradamus statement........... While YES it is true that, at the age of 14 I did watch the Man That Saw Tomorrow, narrated by Orson Wells While I have struggled with the super-natural - aka ghost and what not I find it hard to believe in such things I am a man of proof - and more proof and if you think there is no more proof THEN you must go find more\\ I believe that - I found \[indescribable really\] - I just don't know how to prove it. I do not believe a man can predict the future - at all But I also do not discredit Nostradamus I do believe that a modern man can find educated guess and then investigate those 'alleged findings' If nothing turns up dig harder before you give up. If nothing is there - remember - most things appear to be hidden in very plain sight You could right at it and look right past it. He is a man He is a mimic He does bleed ................................and he/they can be stopped but I do not know how to do it without being laughed at - not being taken seriously and then - ............................................................................................ \[a moment of silence\] ................and will SOMEBODY PLEASE!!!! Tell Tom Hanks that I didn't lose my joy - \- it was taken from me. \-SYS- save your souls p.s. - this is EAR TH - the listening place

Hot_Philosopher3199

I just jumped because the price was going crazy, then I moved it to cold storage and "forgot" about it. Someone a couple weeks ago asked "if anyone loses money buying Bitcoin." The answer is absolutely YES. Only buy what you can forget about for at least 3 years. AND be prepared for AI stocks to way outperform BTC for a while! If the goal is to stack more bitcoin then investing elsewhere to buy more BTC later is a solid option.

No-Shine-9919

I would first get a ticket for the train, so YES. After that it may not matter whether it rises or falls because you are on board, if it falls I would ask myself if I still see a sense and if so then I would operate a steady DCA. But of course everyone has to decide for themselves how convinced they are of BTC. Wish you the best luck ;)

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; The article examines the microstructure of wealth transfer in prediction markets, focusing on Kalshi, a CFTC-regulated platform. It highlights systematic biases where liquidity takers (Takers) disproportionately favor affirmative 'YES' bets, leading to losses, while liquidity makers (Makers) profit by exploiting these biases. The study of 72.1 million trades reveals a longshot bias, with low-probability 'YES' contracts underperforming. Makers benefit from structural arbitrage rather than superior forecasting, capturing an 'Optimism Tax' from Takers' emotional and biased betting behavior. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.

kironet996

YES, they are very proud of their lord and saviour DJT

i_have_chosen_a_name

It's very simple. You buy yes or no shares that pay out 1 dollar if they mature. So if you buy 10 yes shares for 1 cent each you have spend 10 cents and if the thing happens you get payed out 10 times a dollar. If not you lose your 10 cents. When a market is created, there are initially zero shares and no pre-defined prices or odds. Market makers interested in buying YES or NO shares can place Limit Orders at the price they’re willing to pay When offers for the YES and NO side equal $1.00, the order is “matched” and that $1.00 is converted into 1 YES and 1 NO share, each going to their respective buyers. For example, if you place a limit order at $0.60 for YES, that order is matched when someone places a NO order at $0.40. This becomes the initial market price. After that all the yes and no shares are just being traded between the holders of them so every dollar is accounted for.

Moose_Corn

YES

radamec17

yes yes YES!

Bitcoin-Revolution

It’s always a good moment to start HODLing BTC. Waiting to time the market is a bad idea. There’s a possibility that BTC go down… YES, but the conditions that make you unsure of buying are just due to a lack of understanding about what is BTC. Keep doing research about the tech. Don’t listen to AI crypto trading bot.. price doesn’t matter when you swallow the orange pill, you will understand. Stop listening to price prediction. Buy BTC and enjoy the ride.

Icy-Inflation-5903

YES

Crypto-Camel420

YES! Join the whole coiners

Annual-Society7153

YES, YES, YES and yes in the top 20 languages * 是 (shì) or 是的 (shì de) * sí * yes * हाँ (hāṁ) * sim * হ্যাঁ (hyām̐) * да (da) * はい (hai) * ہاں (hāṁ) * हो (ho) * అవును (avunu) * 是 (sī) * evet * 예 (ye) or 네 (ne) * oui * ja * vâng or có * ஆம் (āma) * ہاں (hāṁ) * ya or iya

AutoModerator

Post is by: True-Hat4188 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoIndia/comments/1q3s506/need_advices/ Hello, friends! A couple days ago i received cryptocurrency to my trust wallet via p2p. BUT. The verification service soon showed me a high risk of AML 67%. What should i do about all this? What are the chances that my wallet will be blocked? Idk what to do. And YES i verified the wallet through a trusted website (amlcheck. uk), so it is not a mistake. I'll be waiting for your advices. Thank you! Have a great evening/day *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

Temporary_Shine_6373

in three years? a definitely YES. In short term if he's not willing to lose then no. Many including myself don't hold it for spending immediately but rather think of decades of holdings.

Negative_Associate30

Also crypto : NO!!!! Bitcoin: YES

dLoneRanger

Ledger - NO! Trezor - YES!

No-Put7619

Last month I posted that I was calling December 2025 the Crazy Eights. I said this because it seemed like every time I checked the price it was crossing $88888.88. I just found out Tether bought 8888 Bitcoin in December. Coincidence? 🤔 YES! But it's still funny. 😆 I know it's dumb but I have to entertain myself somehow.

Ninjanoel

everything you are spouting is the post-hoc rationalization for the Nixon shock, it's nonsense propaganda. YES I know what you saying is the "accepted" thinking, but it's all just rationalizing something after the event happened. When everyone sat down and had a think and freely chose their system, they CHOSE deflation over inflation. that is just plain truth. THEN they were forced into a bad situation against their will, and NOW you've got all these reasons why it's not a bad situation. completely laughable.

Helluvacapybara

YES! Message me on eve, lets play!

Kakkarot1707

There has literally only happened to one exchange out of the blue where everyone was in the dark…and a sketchy ass child ran it….the ones like cashapp and Coinbase that are backed by huge trusted multi-billion dollar banks are NOT going to go under randomly…unless the banks behind the scenes go under and they are NOT….If they did, you would have ample time to get out. Binance i would NOT trust, especially if you are in the usa. So if you have coins onba reputable exchange that initially had other services….your couns are safe, and storing in offline storage is pointless in my opinion. If / when crypto becomes a currency then YES everyone should go cold storage

SventuraOscura

The fact that you know the original supply, but CAN'T know all the transactions (apparently, since they can be tracked back), means YES. the bug was abused, since literally there are fake ZEC running on exchanges and being traded DAILY. Basically, Supply is 1000, ok, 1000 in on the pool (But you can't know for sure), 500 exits the pool, (but 1000 are still inside, but you don't know it), Boom. 1500 ZEC total. Easy math, Easy check to do, since isn't privacy shielded at all. It takes 10 Minutes MAX.

FJ1989finance

every week is the better option but..YES

Ikki_The_Phoenix

BTC is a store of value and medium of exchange. Its entire purpose IS trading/exchange. Saying "Bitcoin is useless if you can't trade it" is like saying: "Money is useless if you can't spend it" "Language is useless if no one speaks it" "The internet is useless if no one connects to it" YES. THAT'S THE POINT. They're NETWORKS. Networks require participation.

Everest2017

YES!

nugymmer

The REAL question is this: Should EVERYONE just stick with BTC? The answer is of course a resounding YES. Why? Look at your favorite shitcoins. How well have they held up? Not so great, yeah? Right?

franfishy

tl;dr YES fundamentally, BTC matters most for now technically, BTC follows TA the best, just choose a few indicators that you want to learn, backtest it to at least 2021, you will find that it behaves / follows many of the common indicators principles also given that altcoins are in deep sh1t right now post 10 Oct, there's basically no +EV in trading them unless you're really seasoned. maybe you can share more on some basic strats you plan to use, whether you're trading with leverage or spot only, what's the timeframe you intend to trade with?

En1one

YES! but WHAT does it mean ?

Conscious-Opposite88

YES! i made nice money trading on last December on alts👍⭐ i Never hold alts more than week!⭐

ReliantToker

YES!

unthocks

YES!

Impressive_Tale5475

Investing YES! Trading NEVER!

nailntrm

YES!! And so was yesterday and tomorrow!!

pasafe

YES. Final answer.

Spirited_Syllabub488

YES, totally soaked in discouragement... My model was perfectly giving returns on BTC for the past 7 months with no RED closing month.. But in November, books closed in RED. Also December is not looking great so far. My model catches hidden pattern perfectly with 70% accuracy but this 2 month is not feeling well, after 7 GREEN month streaks. But drawdown is under control, just the mental cause..... Else my model works fine and we will recover soon from this little DD.

Wonderful_Writer_133

What if it makes your AI girlfriend infinitely divisible? Hmmm? What then? Does that make you a super cuck? HInt: YES!

notlooking743

YES! I fully stand by my 150k end of year prediction.

shockwagon

YES if you dont need that money in the next 5-10 years, and you're completely convinced and bullish on blockchain with bitcoin being a store of value. NO if both of the above aren't true. NO if you're trying to make your money back in 3-5 years

North_Appointment410

YES!

codingwithcoffee

Here is my entire strategy for successful Bitcoin investing: Do I have money? YES -> Buy Bitcoin NO -> Earn Money -> Buy Bitcoin Wait patiently. Ignore the noise. Let Bitcoin do its thing… That’s it.

Kie_ra

1.  Idk somewhere between 50-70% 2. bit stressed  3. never sold a. single satoshi  4. not selling my house and putting 100% of my net worth into BTC 5. YES - i don't  6. lmao no, i don't wanna be the product making someone $ and I have stable employment 

Total_Accident1982

I would say YES. It helps me to ignore my emotions when taking financial decisions, like accepting risk or loss from a pure technical view. So I make up my mind about what needs to be done kind of sober and then execute it after a good smoke to not care too much about it and sleep well with the decision ;)

Blade_Runner_69

Yes I don't agree with mocking noob holders because they panic sold, but there are a lot of bots, stock market bros and R buttcoin morons that purposely come here to mock BTC holders CONSTANTLY, they deserve no mercy. NO MERCY.... YES SENSEI.....!🙏🏽

bongosformongos

How many negatives do you want in 1 sentence? YES.

Majestic_Can_6363

nobody knows, but i think YES

unthocks

YES!!!!!! THIS!!!!!

Calm-Professional103

If you’re saying that we’re living in an economic dystopia, well YES. We’ve been here before. It’s a cycle that repeats itself over and over. You can plan for it or you can be its victim 

downtherabbit

Haha YES

Flaky-Coffee-9942

YES

ecnecn

[https://www.iso20022.org/faq](https://www.iso20022.org/faq) Scroll down to: **Are there any cryptocurrencies that are compliant with ISO 20022?** Cryptocurrencies are not inherently ISO 20022 compliant. There is a lot of confusion and misleading information on the web referring to ISO 20022 compliant cryptocurrencies but those statements are not correct **Can a blockchain company be ISO 20022 compliant?** (...) But at the protocol level, blockchains themselves are not inherently ISO 20022 compliant Official ISO Standards Organization FAQ..... NOT COMPLIANT WITH CRYPTO, NOT MADE FOR CRYPTO, JUST AN UPDATE FROM THE OLD PROTOCOL FOR MESSAGES (ISO 15022) This is the official Registration Authority for ISO 20022: ISO 20022 - Registration Authority **SWIFT SC** Avenue Adèle 1 B-1310 La Hulpe Belgium **YES SWIFT**, Swift literally helped to create ISO 15022 and ISO 20022... banks must literally show SWIFT that they implemented the ISO 15022 to ISO 20022 update the right way and get their green light from SWIFT What is with XRP and the whole ISO spam bots?! Crypto isnt even running on ISO 15022 messaging protocol.. For people with knowledge the whole ISO spam is borderline insane, what a win?! Some insane people even posted that ISO 20022 could lead to a win XRP vs. SWIFT.... when SWIFT is the Registration Authority and co-creator of that messaging protocol standard... really?! Whoever created that crypto/ISO myth is the biggest pump-troll ever.

Every-Requirement128

WHEN....... then YES... if it hits 50k, you will wish to buy NOTHING at 86k but.. it's 50:50 because YOU KNOW jack sht.. as ME... .)

borderlin33

YES milion LMAO

KarimHann

YES IT IS !!! But dont sell remember BUY HIGH SELL LOW ! Rule nr 1 make no profit

SnowBeltBJJ

YES

Deslock77

YES! I already bought back again after selling everything at 93k. Will sell all again at 90k, cant wait!

Ifureadthisyoulldie

Anytime I’ve pondered this question a year or so  later the answer was….. YES. I should have bought it. 

notmarduke

YES, about time.  Schiff, cramer, mcribs!  Mortgage the house!

General-Cover-4981

YES! I had some Bitcoin, sold before the first crash. Bought again. Sold and made some profit but very, very little ROI. I would have been better off taking those same funds and putting them into the AI stocks that really took off.

Remarkable_Mess6019

YES

Beneficial_Poet_7983

Given past performance, YES. Look at how many times it has pulled back circa 50%. * August 2012: -56% ...  * April 2013: -83% ...  * December 2013: -50% ...  * December 2017-December 2018: -84% ...  * March 2020: -50% ...  * May 2021: -53%

Useful-Reporter612

I would hate to say YES. Remind me year 2008 and might worse than 2008.

ihatearguingonline

Are you upset? I'm good bud 😂. You're repeating yourself a lot, it's kinda boring... I admitted several times, YES ICP has been bleeding to BTC since launch... Its launch was poorly timed and manipulated and it hasn't been around that long. Every time BTC dropped 90% in the past you had normie stock bros saying the same kind of shit. Yes, so far BTC has been destroying ICP's price action. Some of us are talking about potential in the *future*, based on things other than just green and red candles. This conversation has gotten very boring...all the best to you though, your English is pretty good overall

RastaBooties

YES, ICP is the wave function of interoperable integrated operables, nothing else in the field matches the operability and changeability of its interchangeability on the tilted axis. Anyway, $1000 soon.

unthocks

YES

IntelligentVersion32

YES

Scorpio780

60 Senate votes are needed to open the government House Vote (Oct 19, 2025 – Passed 220–212): Republicans voting YES (to open government): 220 Democrats voting YES: 0 Senate Procedural Votes (13 total, latest Oct 28: 54–45): Republicans voting YES: 52 Democrats + caucusing Independents voting YES: 3 (Fetterman, Cortez Masto, King) Stop lying to people. The crypto markets will be in a much better position if the Democrats would vote to keep the government open but none of them are voting yes. If it would have stayed open tons of ETFs would have been approved during October and the biggest thing, The Clarity Act would be passed by now.

Budget_Eye5861

When you only show the 3 UP years and not the 1 DOWN year, you're not doing it right. YES - it's over :-P

haxsen

1. Their buy/sell exchange market is totally biased, whatever you buy will be expensive / whatever you sell will be cheaper - FOR THEM - like a considerable margin unlike other CEXs. 2. I could not withdraw USDC / USDT - the minimum is 50 USD and fees is 25% - YES 25%. 3. How to get out: Buy a smaller value coin like ANKR (0.001$ right now) and withdraw it to your ETH address to escape ridiculous fees and save yourself.

haxsen

1. Their buy/sell exchange market is totally BS, whatever you buy will be expensive, whatever you sell will be cheaper FOR THEM - like a considerable margin unlike other CEXs. 2. I could not withdraw USDC / USDT - the minimum is 50 USD and fees is 25% - YES 25%. 3. How to get out: Buy a smaller value coin like ANKR (0.001$ right now) and withdraw it to your ETH address to escape ridiculous fees and save yourself.

Bubbly-Wave-2878

Add a third outcome (no contest) at the contract level. It settles to 1 if the bout is ruled nc; otherwise it pays 0 and the usual YES/NO winner pays 1. This lets traders price nc risk instead of forcing a 50/50 post-hoc split.