SYNC

tonyspankss

So first typo I meant 20,000 not 2000 Also I’m loving $SYNC. Anyone else?

AdamFitri2005

Low caps I'd recommend VRA, DUEL, AXGT, CLORE.AI, SYNC, DGI

owlsearch

Fully agree! For anyone new to crypto, here's a guide with screenshots on how to buy and stake SYNC: [https://www.reddit.com/r/syncus/comments/1980wma/guide\_how\_to\_buy\_and\_stake\_sync/](https://www.reddit.com/r/syncus/comments/1980wma/guide_how_to_buy_and_stake_sync/)

R2SDdesigns

It’s not rounding up but I’m using $SYNC token as a sort of savings account. Has 70% APY right now.

Grandmabird

Actually want to be EARLY for a change? This is your opportunity. $SYNC will 100x from here. This is your chance to make it

Grandmabird

Actually want to be EARLY for a change? This is your opportunity. $SYNC will 100x from here. This is your chance to make it

Infamous_Try_3257

For 15% bonus when staking use the referral code LP123 It’s still very very early to get in this project $SYNC #SYNC

EyeAdventurous1031

use ref code : $FREN when you stake $SYNC.

owlsearch

When staking SYNC, make sure to use referral code REDDIT for maximum rebate!

Umarzy

I don't see much traction for SOL. I think INJ & ARB are likely the next big L1/L2s in the next bull. ATOM is unique, it's here to stay. The interchain security is a game changer. Especially when rewards start rolling out for Cosmos Hub stakers. Maybe ALGO & ADA will survive, I'm not following much on them. Also, upcoming projects will do extremely well. I think CREDIT, ZETA, SYNC, and SEI will be some of the best performers in the next cycle. The coming months will be interesting.

Umarzy

Well, looking at the adoption rate, and comparing crypto as an asset class vs stocks/real estate, we are still early. If you're buying before the halving, you are definitely earlier than others. I will stick to ETH, ATOM, and MATIC, then add a couple of promising upcoming tokens- WLTH & SYNC. This year presents ample time for accumulation.

Umarzy

I'm invested in L2 & DeFi projects. So I currently hold ARB, CTSI, OSMO & GRAIL. I'm earning staking rewards for staking CTSI at a 20% APR, and GRAIL rewards on Camelot LP farm. In the coming months, I would include ADE & SYNC once they launch. I think that's the only change that would happen, for now.

Feuvriermc

I reinvested 50% of the profits into ETH. And keeping the other part in USDT for new upcoming tokens- ADE & SYNC. I would be buying these when they launch.

kirtash93

Another tip: If you use Google Authenticator *DONT SYNC* it with your Google account

Umarzy

Q2 generally usually have new projects launching. The good part about that SUI is the vesting for the public sale, so less sell pressure. I'm personally awaiting the token launch of SYNC (Syncswap) & ADE (Weaver labs) happening this quarter as well.

BusinessBreakfast3

L2s are more centralized then their L1 counterparts. Not holding anything against them, proud holder of ARB and hopefully SYNC one day.

cryptomhanks

There is a project called syncswap which confirmed it’ll have a SYNC token in the future. FYI, for any airdrop hunters.

cryptomhanks

There is a project called syncswap which confirmed it’ll have a SYNC token in the future. FYI, for any airdrop hunters.

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; MicroStrategy has acquired an additional $150 million worth of bitcoin, bringing its total holdings to $138,955. Polygon and ZK SYNC have launched the first zero-knowledge proof Ethereum virtual machines (ZK EVMs). MetaMask has added a “sign-in with Ethereum” feature, allowing users to authenticate web services with their wallets. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.*

johnknapik

“It’s gonna be mayyy” -N*SYNC

upboatsnhoes

Yes. ZK SYNC too...

hyperinflationUSA

I know you won’t invest in technology companies, but **are you afraid that the internet will hurt some of the companies that you do invest in, such as The Washington Post or Wells Fargo? Thank you.** WARREN BUFFETT: Well, that’s an absolutely terrific question. You know, I may turn my money over to you. (Laughter and applause) There’s probably no better question we’ll get. And I hope Charlie answers in an appropriate vein considering your age. (Laughter) We do not — we have no — you know, it’s no religious belief that we don’t buy into tech companies. We just don’t — we have never found one — as conventionally defined — we’ve never found one where we think we know enough about what the business will look like in 10 years that we can make a rational decision as to how much we pay now for that business. In other words, we have not been able to find a business where we think we know what that bush will look like in 10 years, and how many birds will be in it, so that we know how many birds we can give up today to participate in that future. Not any — there will be wonderful things, as Charlie so colorfully explained, that will evolve from many of these companies, but we don’t know how to make that decision. And you’re absolutely right that we should be thinking all of the time about whether developments in that tech area threaten the businesses that we’re in now, how you might counter those threats, how we might capitalize in opportunities because of it. It’s a very, very, very important part of business now and will become more important in the years to come, including many of our businesses. For example, you mentioned The Washington Post. Even closer to home, we own a newspaper called The Buffalo News in Buffalo, New York. We own all of that. So we’re in a position to make our own decisions of an operating nature as to what we should do in respect to the internet. And believe me, Stan Lipsey, who’s here today, who runs that paper, and I have talked many, many hours, including considerable time yesterday about what we are doing on the internet, what we should be doing, what other people are doing, how it threatens us, how we can counter those threats, all of that sort of thing. And newspapers are a category that, in my view, are very threatened by the internet because we had an example — The internet is terrific for delivering information. We have a product, World Book, that’s terrific for delivering information. And 15 years ago, print encyclopedias were the best tool, probably, for educating not only young children, but for educating me or Charlie when we wanted to look up something on a subject. And the World Book is a marvelous product. But it requires chopping down trees, and it requires operating paper mills, and it requires binding it and printing, and it requires a delivery of a 70 pound, you know, UPS package. And it’s a — It was put together in a way that was, for 4- or 500 years, the best technique for taking that information and moving it from those who assembled it to those who wanted to use it. And then the internet changed that in a very major way. So we have seen firsthand, and experienced the business consequences of the improvement offered by the internet and the delivery of information. And newspapers, although not as immediately susceptible to that problem, still face that overpowering factor. When you eliminate the delivery cost — I mean, we pay a significant percentage of our circulation revenue to our carriers, and we pay additional money to the district managers, and we pay for the trucks to deliver the product out, and we pay for huge printing presses, and all of that sort of thing. And people do chop down trees in order to give us the raw material to transmit information in Buffalo, you know, about what the Buffalo Bills did yesterday, on Sunday, with all the details. And now you have the internet that has virtually no incremental unit cost to anything and can deliver the information instantaneously. So it’s a big factor for newspapers. And the newspaper world in my view will look very, very, very different in not that many years. And I find it kind of interesting, because the people in the newspaper business are a little schizophrenic about this. They see this. They’re afraid of it. They’re, in almost all cases, trying to combat it on some way operationally. But some of them, at least, continue to go out and buy papers at a price that sort of reflects the economics that used to exist 20 years ago, when it’s — to me it’s very clear that it doesn’t exist anymore. So they sort of have their billfold, you know, in the past, even though they see the future. And, you know, I think, probably, they’re making mistakes in many cases. All of our businesses, virtually — Coca-Cola will not be affected in any significant way by the internet, you know? The razor and blade business won’t be. Although you could dream up things about distribution or so on, but I think that it’s very unlikely. But other businesses we have — our insurance business, particularly at GEICO, will be very affected by the internet. Now, that may turn out to be a big advantage to us over time. I wouldn’t be surprised if it is. But our retailing businesses are all threatened in one way or another by internet developments, and there may be some opportunities there, too. But it’s a change. It’s a change in — it’s going to be change in the world — how the world gets entertainment. It’s going to be a change in the world — how the world gets information. And it is incredibly low cost compared to the — most of the methods of conveying entertainment and information now. SYNC VIDEO TO PARAGRAPH

hyperinflationUSA

even better 2000 https://buffett.cnbc.com/video/2000/04/29/morning-session---2000-berkshire-hathaway-annual-meeting.html >The question about the high tech stocks and possible fallout, any time there have been real bursts of speculation in the market, you know that — it does get corrected, eventually. Ben Graham was right when he said that in the short run it’s a voting machine, and the long run it’s a weighing machine. Sooner or later, the amount of cash that a business can disgorge in the future governs the value it has — that the stock commands — in the market. But it can take a long time. And, I mean, it’s a very interesting proposition. For example, if you take a company that, in the end, never makes any money, but trades — changes hands — representing a valuation of 10 or $20 billion for some time, there’s no wealth created. There’s a tremendous amount of wealth transferred. And I think you will see, when we look back on this era, you will see this as a period of enormous amounts of wealth transfer, but in the end the only wealth creation comes about through what the business creates. There’s no magic to it. If a company that’s not worth anything sells for 20 billion and 5 percent of it changes hands, somebody takes a billion dollars from somebody else. But investors as whole gain nothing. They all feel richer. It’s a very interesting phenomenon. But they can’t be richer except — as a group — unless the company makes them richer. And it’s the same principle as a chain letter. If you’re very early on a chain letter you can make money. There’s no money created by chain letters. In fact, there’s the frictional cost of envelopes, and postage, and that sort of thing. So the net, there’s some money destroyed a little bit. And there’s money destroyed by the frictional cost of trading and investing, and that comes out of investor’s pockets. But the manias that periodically take place — and not just in stocks. We had a similar mania — not necessarily similar — we certainly had a mania in farmland here in Nebraska 20 years ago. And land which couldn’t produce, we’ll say, more than 70 or $80 an acre would sell for 2,000 an acre at times when interest rates were 10 percent. Well, that math will kill you. And it killed the people who bought it at those prices, and it killed a great many banks here in Nebraska who lent based on that sort of thing. But while it was going on everybody thought it was wonderful, because every farm was selling for more than the similar farm had sold for a month earlier. And it was momentum investing in farmland. And, in the end, valuation does count. But it can go on a long time, and when you get a huge number of participants playing with ever increasing sums, you know, it creates its own apparent truth for a — what can be for a very considerable period of time. It doesn’t go on forever. And whether it has fallout to the whole economy, like it probably did in the late ’20s, or whether it’s just an isolated industry where the — or sector — where the bubble bursts and it really doesn’t affect other values, who knows? But five or 10 years from now, you will know. SYNC VIDEO TO PARAGRAPH

badeand

SYNC - First Crypto bonds - 3,5M market cap

badeand

SYNC - Crypto bonds that locks liquidity

Wooden-Day5445

buddies, I want to give advice. Have a look at Syncronauts NFT. It looks very promising. Use ur CryptoBonds as collateral in SYNC Network’s P2P lending system, which allows u to get even more financial flexibility with your locked liquidity

badeand

SYNC

Shaaz1790

🔻🔺BABYHARMONY 🎶 ▶️🖇NEW ALL TIME HIGH IS SOON WITH NEW WHITEPAPER◀️➖After thousand X from launch,it is stable and continue its uptrend 🔝 .BABYHARMONY Team is well planned and creates a drastic change in last 1 month .many new upcoming programs ,listings are soon .Continuos contest is held day by day .guys lets join the party and earn well 👉🏻 HOLD BABYHARMONY 7%EARN ONE💶 👉🏻⛓Lkd 1yr 👉🏻🐳Anti-Whale 👉🏻CMC 🔖 👉🏻CGC🔖 👉🏻SYNC➖BABYCAKE & ONE ↔️24hr active group &VC available 🌈Twt:@BabyHarmonyfair

coffee4dd1ct

Pls check linksync.. $SYNC just launched.. worth to check.. CMC soon, Certik paid in full already.. gonna be awesome..

darkstarman

1. THERE'S NO SUCH THING AS A WALLET SYNC OR RESYNC 2. I never heard of Ronin 3. ENTERING YOUR SEED PHRASE IS NOT A THING

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; The SYNC Network recently introduced a new asset class called CryptoBonds to the DeFi space. The cryptoBonds are time-locked NFTs that generate rewards for their holders. The value of 1,800 CryptoBond created so far has seen an average increase of over 203% which easily covers the recent downtrend in crypto. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.*

henfadin

Thanks for answering, that makes good sense. Actually also one of the reasons I only hold that one among ETH and an even more unknown one: SYNC. I just believe that MDX could become huge, looking at their roadmap.

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; The SYNC Network has launched peer-to-peer lending against CryptoBonds, a new asset class of time-locked, reward-generating NFTs. Borrowers on the platform can use the cryptoBonds as hard collateral to borrow capital. The duration of the loan and the rates of interest are dynamic and agreed upon by the borrower and lender. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.*

milonuttigrain

The DeFi and NFT platform, SYNC Network, recently announced the launch of peer-to-peer lending on its platform to offer heightened security to lenders.

Double_d5050

Like N'SYNC buy buy buy

R0B0C0P33

This is ripe for an N'SYNC parody.

CryptogeniK_

SYNC Network, just because ya know hopium ;)

Extravagos

I use SYNC for Android

CryptogeniK_

I concur! Good job op! You should consider adding Chia Network (XCH) and SYNC Network (SYNC)

CryptogeniK_

Pretty good! I would add Chia Network (XMR) and SYNC Network (SYNC)

WombatLover2000

Yea I know that exchanges set their own price but there's usually a correlation with tx fee. Like Harmony for example on binance is 0.002 ONE to withdraw. Anyways I was gonna buy some VET and test it out myself but VTHO withdraws are suspended and I assume I'd need that in SYNC to do anything. Sadness.

dagger_spell

Ledger works with SYNC. Useless information seeing as you don’t have one.

Hookahista

I leave my VET on the official SYNC wallet, no need to constantly renew the locking period

Fluffy-Importance436

Like SYNC. Tradeable NFT crypto bonds. Low entry, huge upside and the team is actively working on their next release for multichain support. [SYNC](https://syncbond.com/)

Fluffy-Importance436

Check out SYNC - Tradeable NFT crypto bonds. Up to 300% yeild. Great project, low entry, huge upside and the team is very active working on thier next release for multichain support. Thank me later. [SYNC Bond](https://syncbond.com/)

Fluffy-Importance436

When you're all done with the Elon DOGE rug check out SYNC - Tradeable NFT crypto bonds. Great project, low entry, huge upside and the team is very active working on thier next release for multichain support. Thank me later.

XInceptor

Smartkey (IoT project already being implemented in cities), SYNC (crypto bonds), Superbid (Auction platform for influencers)

XInceptor

OMI (NFTs from major licenses), TRAC (supply chain and blockchain integration), and SYNC (tradeable crypto bonds as NFTs)

XInceptor

Well you asked so I’ll name just a few. ADA (next gen blockchain. First blockchain based on years of peer reviewed research) SYNC (Crypto Bonds. First in the space) CHAIN (Gaming coin that’s been integrated with Call of Duty. Fortnite is next. Lower cap with plenty of room to grow) ORN (Exchange aggregator giving access to liquidity from major CEX and DEX all in place, keep coins in your wallet, NFT market aggregator announced, low gas fees, been in testing for awhile going live on the 31st)

XInceptor

Not financial advice, but this is what *I* would do. 40% SKEY (IoT project), 35% ADA (next gen blockchain), 25% SYNC (crypto bonds). It’d be higher risk, but high reward. I’d let profits flow from highest marketcap (ADA) to lowest (SYNC). Majority of people you ask here would likely tell you BTC/ETH/maybe one smaller alt

XInceptor

SYNC (crypto bonds) and SKEY (irl IoT project that’s already being utilized). There’s others but those two I’m most excited for and don’t get attention for now

XInceptor

High risk high reward? Check out SYNC. First ever bonds in crypto, very small marketcap. Seeing the strong DeFi trends, I’m personally expecting it to at least do okay. Always dyor. Something that people sleep on? Check out TRAC and SKEY. So far I don’t think there’s been a big boom in IoT projects but they’re the ones that have real world application and both of these are continuing to be implemented for irl uses

frank__costello

> Crypto Bonds was a missing link for crypto before SYNC "CryptoBonds do not share anything in common with traditional finance bonds and do not represent a debt obligation owed by a person to the holder of the CryptoBond. They are called ”bonds” because they are created by ”bonding” tokens representing the creators share of a decentralized liquidity pool" With that being said, I do know other projects building bonds :)

badeand

Crypto Bonds was a missing link for crypto before SYNC. With crypto steadily getting the same financial instruments as fiat markets the future for crypto really looks bright.

CryptogeniK_

I think $SYNC is going to come out on top

bitbuggs

You're new to crypto and going right to low-caps? Good luck my friend. My low cap picks are Agave and SYNC. But I already made a good profit from both so be careful. Also, with low caps a few hundred go a long way. Its All about risk management.

XInceptor

ENJ because it has a big use case in gaming, the largest part of the entertainment industry. It’s starting to get price action to reflect this. SKEY because it has massive use case irl and is already being adopted in Polish cities and households. SYNC because it’s first form of bonds in the crypto space.

XInceptor

Since you asked sure. Always check them out yourself though. Look into ADA (next gen blockchain) and ENJ (gaming/NFT platform/blockchain), they both have a lot that’s going to be happening throughout the year. For a couple that are a bit smaller, higher risk but more potential, take a look at ORN (exchange aggregator) and RARI (governance for an NFT platform). For a one that’s still has a lot of room to grow check out SYNC (crypto bonds).

Brainz33

Check out SYNC and ANRX. I have a bag of each and I am very bullish about their future. You can create crypto bonds with SYNC and ANRX is a gaming/NFT mixture.

XInceptor

Just a heads up you’re gonna get downvoted because your asking about something outside of the top 10 on this subreddit. Check out SYNC

Chucktownbadger

SYNC is one I’m in currently and have been watching closely for months now. Current MCAP of $21M and a full diluted MCAP of $24M. SYNC is a DeFi project offering up bond market functionality. Basically, the bonds time lock LPs in the pools to ensure liquidity and pay out SYNC tokens in “interest”. When a bond is created you get an NFT as well that can be traded in the event you need some personal liquidity. The team is currently working on collateralized loans against bonds and a number of other features and additional pairs right now. The product is fully functional and the team is very active on both Telegram and Discord. Check out the website for more info. Syncbond.com

badeand

Check out the bond collections from SYNC

Chucktownbadger

TRAC, SYNC, and MATIC. I’m still digging more into the NFT space and what’s out there but surely those will pop too.

badeand

SYNC - Real

NotherSmartyPants

Awesome write up. SYNC will go far, got some on the nice dip!

badeand

Once again I'm glad to be a SYNC holder. Crypto-bonds are going to be mainstream.

Rednitrous18

What are you talking about? This isn't even SYNC related.

i_let_it_slip

All I'll say about SYNC is that my free coins on Kucoin are now worth $6, all others are sub 1 cent. My version of the uniswap airdrop aha.

AbsoluteFireTrades

You are saying the coin itself, SYNC has potential to 25x right?

Rednitrous18

You can create your own Bonds with SYNC tokens. At the moment there are not a lot of sales for Bonds as many people are waiting for the launch of swappable to list there bonds.

Loose_with_the_truth

So is it better to buy the SYNC tokens on Uniswap or to buy the Crypto Bonds on the Dapp, or to buy them on Raribles?

ComicWeaver

I've been following Ivanontech a long while now, he was the one that posted this token on twitter on the day it released. They are supposedly a group of student of his academy that bundled their vision and created SYNC. The team is public.

badeand

As a SYNC holder I have no idea what dip you are all talking about :)

badeand

SYNC :)

badeand

SYNC - MC: 4,3M USD, SUPPLY: 113,147,194 Pretty new, but seems to be the only real crypto bond with a market for selling and buying bonds. That means you can stake with high return but still sell the staking position if you want to move fonds elsewhere. This is definitely filling a gap in the market and making crypto more of a full financial market. So far only listed on Uniswap and Bilaxy. [https://app.syncbond.com/](https://app.syncbond.com/)