ESG

VegetableBowl9258

Really solid write-up love how you approached this from both macro and micro angles. Totally agree on SMR’s regulatory edge being a double-edged sword. The NRC license gives it a legit moat, but the execution risk and past delays are hard to ignore. Also think you nailed the “delicate” part in nuclear, every piece of news (good or bad) gets outsized reactions because the industry still runs more on narrative than revenue. For me, the Romania deal was interesting, but I’m watching how the DOE plays its funding cards in the next few quarters. If SMRs get real domestic traction or tax incentives through ESG reclassification, the risk/reward could shift fast. Curious how are you weighing uranium prices in your thesis? Spot has been strong, but would love to know if you think supply constraints or demand spikes are baked into your view long term.

Tomieez

Did Jeff invite Mr. Environment Leo to his wedding to score high on ESG?

DaniDaniDa

Inverse ESG

DaemonTargaryen2024

The closest thing your looking for is an ESG fund

PeterParkerUber

Isn’t P&G the owner of the patent, and they gave the global license to PCT to produce the recycled plastics, so they can achieve their ESG goal of 100% recycled packaging by 2030. So aren’t P&G almost a guaranteed customer.

Pale-Manufacturer278

TMC – Iceberg Research Is Getting Mined 🔥🧊🦍 Picture this: 🚨 A lone ape in a scuba suit, diving deep beneath the waves… 💣 Planting explosive mines on a massive iceberg labeled “Iceberg Research”… 🌊 Because those clowns decided to short $TMC, a literal deep sea mining company. You can’t make this stuff up. Iceberg Research — the same jokers who have made a living trying to torpedo small-cap plays with hit pieces — decided to come after The Metals Company, which just so happens to be holding the keys to the planet’s next resource boom. We’re talking billions in metals critical for EVs, energy storage, and every green initiative Uncle Sam wants to throw money at. And their bear case? “Mining the ocean sounds hard 😢” No sh*t, Sherlock. That’s why it’ll be worth trillions when they pull it off. Let’s be real — Iceberg is shorting progress. They’re shorting innovation. They’re shorting apes going deep sea for generational wealth. Meanwhile $TMC has: ✅ Actual contracts with the International Seabed Authority ✅ A mapped resource estimate worth more than the GDP of half the world ✅ Tech and vessels already operational ✅ The only viable plan to mine battery metals without wrecking ecosystems This isn’t some ESG-friendly word salad — it’s industrial revolution 2.0 and the shorts are still clinging to surface-level research. So grab your scuba gear, apes. We’re not just going to the moon anymore — we’re going to the ocean floor to blow the lid off this iceberg. $TMC 💣🧊🌊🦍💎

Fit-Weather7748

I mean I personally don't think you can have it both ways. Either you let someone else control your investments via ETFs and you get stuck with morally ambiguous companies but you're relatively safe or you choose your own investments and risk losing money but you have companies you trust. On the other hand, you can find more ESG related ETF but then you run into the issue that you might not gain the return that you'd prefer. It may not be the answer you want to hear but the thing is, so many companies do morally ambiguous acts. If you're so keen on this being an issue then choose your own stocks and do your own research that way you can sleep at night. That's my take

FatHedgehog__

Look up ESG etfs. I think its all fugazi, but you may find something that gives you a little piece of mind.

IslesFanInNH

Returns may not be as good as others, but you can look for ESG funds or ETF’s.

raggajar

My money is on OXY! Occidental Petroleum (OXY) stands out as a top bet if Iran closes the Strait of Hormuz, a move that could disrupt up to 20% of global oil supply and send prices soaring. Unlike majors with exposure to the Middle East, OXY’s production is almost entirely U.S.-based, especially in the Permian Basin, shielding it from regional instability. As an upstream-focused company, OXY is highly leveraged to oil prices—any spike translates directly into increased cash flow and profits. The company has significantly improved its balance sheet and is committed to shareholder returns through aggressive buybacks and dividends, a strategy that would accelerate with higher crude prices. Additionally, OXY’s investment in carbon capture positions it uniquely among oil producers, offering a green narrative that may attract ESG-minded investors even during an oil rally. Backed by Berkshire Hathaway, OXY combines operational safety, upside potential, and capital discipline—making it a strong tactical play in a high-risk geopolitical scenario.

raggajar

My money is on OXY! Occidental Petroleum (OXY) stands out as a top bet if Iran closes the Strait of Hormuz, a move that could disrupt up to 20% of global oil supply and send prices soaring. Unlike majors with exposure to the Middle East, OXY’s production is almost entirely U.S.-based, especially in the Permian Basin, shielding it from regional instability. As an upstream-focused company, OXY is highly leveraged to oil prices—any spike translates directly into increased cash flow and profits. The company has significantly improved its balance sheet and is committed to shareholder returns through aggressive buybacks and dividends, a strategy that would accelerate with higher crude prices. Additionally, OXY’s investment in carbon capture positions it uniquely among oil producers, offering a green narrative that may attract ESG-minded investors even during an oil rally. Backed by Berkshire Hathaway, OXY combines operational safety, upside potential, and capital discipline—making it a strong tactical play in a high-risk geopolitical scenario.

raggajar

My money is on OXY! Occidental Petroleum (OXY) stands out as a top bet if Iran closes the Strait of Hormuz, a move that could disrupt up to 20% of global oil supply and send prices soaring. Unlike majors with exposure to the Middle East, OXY’s production is almost entirely U.S.-based, especially in the Permian Basin, shielding it from regional instability. As an upstream-focused company, OXY is highly leveraged to oil prices—any spike translates directly into increased cash flow and profits. The company has significantly improved its balance sheet and is committed to shareholder returns through aggressive buybacks and dividends, a strategy that would accelerate with higher crude prices. Additionally, OXY’s investment in carbon capture positions it uniquely among oil producers, offering a green narrative that may attract ESG-minded investors even during an oil rally. Backed by Berkshire Hathaway, OXY combines operational safety, upside potential, and capital discipline—making it a strong tactical play in a high-risk geopolitical scenario.

Ok_Magician5303

You're off to a great start by taking advantage of your 401k, especially with a 4% employer match—that's free money and a solid foundation. Your fund choices show you're aiming for a socially responsible and globally diversified approach. Here's a quick breakdown of your allocation: Parnassus Core Equity (45%): Strong choice for a large-cap, ESG-aligned U.S. fund. It’s actively managed, so fees might be higher, but it has a solid long-term track record. EuroPacific Growth (35%): Good for international exposure, especially in developed markets. Keep in mind it’s also actively managed and can be volatile, but it balances your domestic-heavy IRA. Impax Small Cap (20%): Adds growth potential and diversity. Small caps can be more volatile but offer higher upside over time. Since you're already in Fidelity index funds (FZROX, FZILX) with your IRA, this mix adds active management and sector diversity. You're also staying away from bonds for now, which makes sense with a long time horizon and rising-rate concerns, but consider adding some in the future for stability as your portfolio grows. Overall, this looks like a well-thought-out allocation for a first 401k. Keep an eye on fund fees and re-evaluate annually. Good job getting started.

DoctorBaglioni

Everything's an ESG investment by that definition... Shit's bleak.

cinJESUS

i have a friend like that but he is still pursuing ESG consulting 🤣

AdRoutine8022

Honestly, it’s not that surprising. A lot of funds have strict ESG policies now, and Tesla's been getting more heat over labor issues and governance stuff. I’ve seen other European funds drop companies over things like union problems or environmental concerns too. For example, Norway’s sovereign wealth fund dropped several companies last year for ethical reasons. I still think Tesla has potential long-term, but it’s clear some big investors aren’t willing to overlook certain red flags anymore, especially when there are other EV plays out there that feel "cleaner" from a policy perspective.

PulIthEld

The global bottled water market is projected to grow from $292.6 billion in 2025 to $509 billion by 2030, driven by rising demand for clean water, health-conscious consumers, and sustainability trends. Major players like Nestlé, Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, and Danone dominate, but Primo Water (PRMW) offers a focused investment opportunity with strong growth potential. This DD explores why water stocks are worth considering, with a focus on Primo Water as a high-potential pick, alongside safer options like Coca-Cola and water-focused ETFs. **Why Invest in Bottled Water?** The bottled water market is a stable, growing sector with strong fundamentals: Market Growth: The global bottled water market is expected to grow at a 6.4% compound annual growth rate (CAGR) from 2025 to 2030, reaching $509 billion. Still water (74% of the market) and sparkling water (7.9% CAGR) are both expanding, driven by health trends and demand in emerging markets. Consumer Trends: Consumers are shifting from sugary drinks to bottled water, with U.S. per capita consumption rising from 31.6 gallons in 2013 to 46.4 gallons in 2023. Global Demand: Over 2.2 billion people lack access to safe drinking water, boosting demand in Asia-Pacific (44.5% market share) and developing regions. Climate and Urbanization: Water scarcity and urban growth are increasing reliance on bottled water, especially in regions with unreliable tap water. **Major Players in the Market** The bottled water market is competitive, with four major companies holding significant shares and a large "others" category including private labels and regional players. Here’s the breakdown: Nestlé (NSRGY): Estimated 20–25% global market share. Brands include Nestlé Pure Life, Perrier, and San Pellegrino. North America accounts for ~56% of its water sales. Nestlé’s planning to spin off its water business in 2025, which could impact its exposure but create a new investment opportunity. Dividend yield: ~3%. Coca-Cola (KO): Estimated 15–20% share, led by Dasani (12% of still water), Smartwater, and Topo Chico. A defensive stock with a 2.86% dividend yield and a $305 billion market cap, backed by Berkshire Hathaway’s $27.6 billion stake. PepsiCo (PEP): Estimated 10–15% share with Aquafina and LIFEWTR. Water is a smaller part of its portfolio (58% of revenue from snacks), but innovations like carbon capture bottling add upside. Dividend yield: ~3%. Danone (DANOY): Estimated 10–15% share, with premium brands like Evian and Volvic. Strong in Europe and focused on sustainable packaging. Dividend yield: ~3.5%. Others (~35%): Includes private labels (25–30% of the market), Nongfu Spring (China), Bisleri (India), and smaller players like Primo Water. **Investment Pick: Primo Water (PRMW)** For a targeted bet on the bottled water market, Primo Water (PRMW) stands out as a high-growth, pure-play option: Overview: Primo Water is a North American company focused on bottled water and dispensers, with $1.77 billion in 2023 revenue (5% growth) and 20% adjusted EBITDA margins. Why Invest: Unlike diversified giants like Coca-Cola or PepsiCo, Primo is 100% focused on water, making it a direct play on market growth. Its stock price is ~$27 (June 2025), up 50% year-to-date, with analyst targets of $30–$35 by end of 2026. Growth is driven by acquisitions, office reopenings, and demand for reusable water jugs. Catalysts: Rising health consciousness and corporate demand for water coolers are boosting sales. Primo’s focus on sustainability (e.g., reusable containers) aligns with consumer and regulatory trends. Risks: High debt from acquisitions could be a concern if interest rates remain elevated. Private labels (25% market share) are also a competitive threat, but Primo’s brand loyalty and B2B contracts provide stability. **Alternative Investment Options ** Large-Cap Stocks: Coca-Cola (KO) and PepsiCo (PEP) offer stability, dividends, and exposure to water alongside broader portfolios. Coca-Cola’s scale and Buffett’s backing make it a safer bet for conservative investors. Water ETFs: Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO, 0.60% expense ratio) and First Trust Water ETF (FIW) provide diversified exposure to water-related companies, including purification and delivery. Both have outperformed the S&P 500 over the past decade. Utilities: American Water Works (AWK) is the largest U.S. water utility, with $944 million in 2023 net income and a 2.1% dividend yield. Its stock (~$130) has grown 500% since its 2008 IPO, offering low-risk exposure. Options: For higher risk, PRMW January 2026 $30 calls (~$2.50) offer leverage if the stock hits analyst targets. Coca-Cola or PepsiCo options are less volatile but still provide upside. **Macro Tailwinds for 2025** Population and Urbanization: The global population is nearing 8.5 billion, with 3–4 billion lacking reliable tap water. Urban growth and tourism (1.3 billion international arrivals in 2023) drive bottled water demand. Sustainability Trends: Companies are shifting to recycled PET and aluminum cans (7% CAGR), addressing environmental concerns and appealing to ESG investors. Economic Resilience: Bottled water is a consumer staple, maintaining demand during economic downturns. Stocks like KO and AWK are defensive plays in volatile markets. **Risks to Consider** Environmental Regulations: Bottled water companies face scrutiny for plastic pollution. Potential bans on single-use plastics could raise costs, though firms are adapting with sustainable packaging. Private Label Competition: Store brands hold 25–30% of the market, pressuring margins for branded players. Nestlé’s Spinoff: The potential sale of Nestlé’s water business (~$5.5 billion valuation) could disrupt its market position or create a new stock to watch. Interest Rates: Higher rates could impact debt-heavy companies like Primo Water or utilities like AWK. Conclusion The bottled water market offers a compelling investment opportunity due to its growth, driven by health trends, water scarcity, and sustainability efforts. Primo Water (PRMW) is a high-potential pick for those seeking focused exposure, while Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, and ETFs like PHO provide safer options. With the market set to grow significantly by 2030, now’s a good time to consider water-related investments. Disclaimer: no shit this is generated by AI

number2post

Too bad all of the people waiting in line didn’t care enough to just leave. Guess their ESG scores must be tight.

BidInteresting3775

those are bullshit. an oil company can have a high ESG rating

tamomaha

I love when other people do ESG based investing. The more dumb money in the market the better opportunities are to make money for rational people

ziggy029

I invest for maximum growth and use some of the proceeds to fund my causes and candidates. I wouldn't \*directly\* invest in a company whose business practices and social views absolutely repelled me, but that's not practical in a mutual fund or ETF. Even so-called ESG investing misses that mark because what one person considers "ethical", another might not.

EmployeeMaximum6787

TSLA got delisted from the S&P 500 ESG in 2022. S&P main Is next 

LateralEntry

Don’t invest in Palantir? If you’re interested, they have ESG funds of various sorts that avoid investing in companies that meet certain criteria. What you do with your money is up to you.

chopsui101

to find a Shariah compliant large cap company in the US you should stretch so you don't hurt yourself when you are doing the mental gymnastics it takes. It's the same with the ESG funds.....takes bad eye sight and ability to do really good mental gymnastics

Leading-Clock-1195

ESG

0regonPatriot

Yeah we all agree DEI and ESG pretty much fucked Boeing, they purposely let QA/QC slide in efforts that diversity statistics ran by inexperienced persons is more important than building planes

Ok_Boysenberry_1301

u/bignick954 Had been asking similar questions - would love your and everyone's feedback on this new app - [https://illuminate.earth/](https://illuminate.earth/) \- I find we have much more sophisticated tools available than what we used for ESG investing 1.0, I.e portfolio construction and automated shareholder voting and engagement across companies.

dissentmemo

Have you looked at ESG?

Careless_Perception4

HSBC MSCI World Ishares EM IMI Ishares EU ESG Nvidia Rheinmetall Yes, all five at ones

TheWifeysBoyfriend

Tesla's valuation is lofty, but calling it Enron-Lehman is melodramatic. Enron was fraud. Lehman was overleveraged. Tesla sells real products, runs at a profit, and holds no systemic debt risk. Yes, it trades at a premium, so do all category leaders. Toyota's P/E is 9. Tesla’s is ~45. High, but not dot-com insane, and justified (to bulls) by vertical integration, software, and energy. FSD is still Level 2, true. But others aren't ahead. Waymo and Cruise scaled back. No one’s cracked full autonomy. Tesla is dabbling in AI and robotics, but commercial viability is speculative. So was the iPhone in 2005. Carbon credits helped earnings. They're declining, but Tesla’s still profitable without them. Bitcoin and Doge were distractions, not core business. Pension and ESG exposure is real, but manageable. Tesla is big, but not systemic. Narratives drive all markets. The question isn't "bubble or not?" it’s: can Tesla grow into its valuation, or not? Time will answer, not memes.

astrophysics23

Alright you plastic-pilled legends, gather ’round. It’s time to talk about PureCycle ($PCT) — a company that turns trash into high-purity cash… and is about to turn short sellers into mulch. 📈 THE BULL CASE (AKA “WHY THIS STOCK IS A LIT FUSE”): • 🏭 Factory Online: Shorts bet Ironton wouldn’t work. It works. 90%+ uptime. Resin flowing. Bears seething. • 💵 Revenue Printing: First-ever revenue just dropped ($1.6M) — no more “pre-revenue startup” cope. • 🔬 P&G Is Testing It: Procter & f\*\*\*ing Gamble is in final stages of testing their resin. Big leagues only. They've also promoted their partnership at conferences. • 📦 15 MILLION Pounds of Resin Ready: Literal mountains of plastic just sitting, waiting for a mega-deal. • 🧠 Stanley Druckenmiller Bought In: Billionaire macro god said “yes.” Shorts should’ve said “no.” • 🫣 Short Interest is UNREAL: • Over 50 MILLION shares short • Over 36% of float • 16.8 days to cover Translation: this thing farts and shorts will panic-buy each other’s grandma’s house. 🔒 INSIDERS HOLDING TIGHT • Execs and early investors are locked in like chastity belts at Comic-Con. • That means the tradable float is TINY. Add 50M short shares on top? That’s a squeeze cocktail with a rocket chaser. ESG? MORE LIKE ES-GEESUS Recycling plastic into virgin-grade gold. Whole industry’s broken, and these guys are fixing it while shorts are still Googling “what is polypropylene.” For real though, I've spent years reviewing every conference call, reviewing technical reports, and talking to engineers. And I didn't post until now because I didn't want to post something when there was still doubt. But now, there's no doubt. These guys are gonna pull it off. ⸻ TL;DR: Bears bet on failure. They got a functioning plant and 15M pounds of premium goop instead. Stan D’s in. P&G’s testing. Shorts are trapped in a polymer death spiral. This is ESG meets WSB. Green tech with red candles for bears. Not financial advice. Just a guy who thinks plastic is sexy when it prints. Do your own DD

Far-Fennel-3032

Which funnily enough their sickening greed still leads them to being one of the largest forces pushing for climate change action (and DEI programs as part of their wider ESG which they have now rebranded as 'transition' which conservatives have yet to picked up on) with them somehow getting sued by republicans states for not investing in coal. So god help us this the push for renewable energy is being funded by the people upset that the healthcare company isn't killing enough people.

FullyLoadedClipsYT

Alright degenerates, here’s the full rundown on HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. (TSXV: HIVE) — the former crypto miner turned AI hype play that’s trying to ride both the Bitcoin rocket and the GPU gravy train. As of May 26, 2025, HIVE is rocking a market cap of CAD 427.35M, with a stock price around CAD 2.75 and 180.88M shares outstanding. Financials? Buckle up. FY2024 revenue hit CAD 114.5M, but they posted a CAD 51.2M net loss and negative gross profit of CAD 26M — not exactly stonks. Assets are solid though at CAD 307.6M, and they’re only carrying CAD 30.6M in debt, so they’re not overleveraged like your cousin’s margin account. Their P/S ratio is about 3.7x, and P/B is 1.4x, but P/E doesn’t exist ‘cause they’re not printing profits yet (diamond hands needed). They’re trying to pivot into high-performance computing and AI data centers — hence the rebrand — and are aiming to hit 25 EH/s in Bitcoin hashrate, which is giga-chad territory. They’ve got mining ops in Canada, Sweden, and Paraguay, using green energy to keep ESG Karens quiet. Gross margins are still negative (ouch), and while we don’t have exact ROE or ROA, it’s safe to say they’re not popping champagne in accounting. On the risk side, they live and die by Bitcoin’s mood swings, hardware costs, energy prices, and regulatory whiplash — so expect volatility higher than your ex’s emotions. That said, institutional ownership is around 18%, insiders own a measly 0.32%, and beta is a spicy 3.52 — so it moves faster than a YOLO options chain. TL;DR: HIVE is a high-risk, high-aspiration bet on both crypto and AI, backed by renewable energy and an ambition to be more than just another miner. If BTC moons and AI becomes the second coming, HIVE could print. If not, well… it’s not the first time this sub has collectively held a flaming bag. Do your DD, but don’t say Daddy WSB didn’t warn you.

pancake_gofer

Other parts of the world are still upgrading in ESG and green tech.

Educational-Shock-36

I met with a Fidelity advisor and felt like it was a big waste of time. They tried to move my stock investments into ESG funds.

OptimalActiveRizz

I know people are probably scoffing or laughing at this, but this is super common. This philosophy is the whole reason ESG and impact investing is a thing.

TurboSalsa

All it means is is that the companies are transparent about measuring and disclosing certain metrics related to ethical and sustainability issues, as well as having a strategy in place to improve on them, not that the underlying business itself is inherently ethical or sustainable. I could have a publicly traded company that operates a giant pile of burning tires in a public parks and still release an ESG report. Would probably be a blast to read though.

weed_cutter

I asked ChatGPT ... it says my idea (strong-form EMH) it probably more right in theory but there is academic studies (hong and Kacperczyk 2009) that support that sin stocks have a higher risk-adjusted return. My theory is essentially: If sin stocks are undervalued, arbitrageurs will buy them until they reach **fair value.** I guess it depends on short-term momentum of ESG norms (like a sudden period where big institutions avoid certain stocks suddenly). Probably opportunity in that short window.

scoberly

Check out ESG investing. There are a growing number of ETFs that invest broadly in the market while specifically excluding certain industries - weapons are a common exclusion. Vanguard's ESGV and iShare's XVV are examples. Anyway - you're starting at a great age just get it rolling!

InsaneGambler

Rising interest rates destroyed green energy stocks since most of them rely heavily on cheap capital. As for ESG, Exxon Mobil, an oil company, had a way better ESG score than Tesla!

ShadowLiberal

What the heck is an "ESG" stock supposed to be in the first place? There's groups that rate every company on ESG criteria and give them a score, which can be used by individual investors and ESG funds (in not just the US but Europe and the rest of the world) to decide if they should invest in it or not. You don't have to be a solar or renewable energy company to have a high ESG score. A lot of big companies purposely try to get themselves a higher ESG score so that they get more investors. It's part of why the big tech companies had goals about being powered fully by renewable energy by some distant year, and why some of them have had goals to become net carbon negative over their entire lifetime. Not to mention the workforces at a lot of companies are filled with people who care about stuff like that, who would probably want to pursue such goals anyway even without an ESG score (because for example a lot of people are concerned about climate change, especially in younger generations). So no, "ESG" companies are still quite investable, even if Trump wants to declare war on the whole idea of ESG investing.

kenypowa

ESG is BS. How can giant fossil fuel companies such as Exxon on it while Tesla and BYD aren't?

xiongchiamiov

There are really two things at play for most people. The first are folks who believe that green energy, or other things, are going to be more successful, which is the business evaluation. "70% of people want renewable energy but only 7% have solar panels" is in fact really great support for that, because it shows there's a lot of market opportunity for whoever can eliminate the existing barriers. The second group are folks who want to do just general broad investing, but morally believe it's improper to support fossil fuels, weapons, etc. Underperforming VTI is not an issue there because it's an intentional decision to not optimize solely for profit. That's the ESG funds. I'm not sure why the OP is discussing these together since they're fairly different.

Zealousideal-Fee3887

Green energy and ESG investments are facing challenges, but thhat doesn't mean they're not worth cons

Wrong_Phase_5581

Didn’t read all of this I’m just responding to the title : Green stocks are businesses just like any other business. Their price can rise and fall and is based on cash flow and ability to scale. Stop thinking of businesses as ESG or green unless it’s in a PR or reputation perspective. Even that has been proven not to be relevant for returns long term. Invest in solid companies

shortandpainful

I believe the stock market as it exists today is entirely immoral. It is a hypercapitalist monstrosity that directly incentivizes companies to behave immorally with regard to their workforce and the public as a whole. That being said, if you stay out of the market entirely, there are very few good options to invest in your future that do more than keep pace with inflation. You basically have two options: invest only in specific companies you actually believe in, which carries a larger amount of risk and less upside; or put your money in an index fund, which dilutes the holdings so much that you aren’t contributing directly to any one specific company very much. In the latter category, there are various ESG (environmental, social, and governance) funds that try to avoid holdings that people might morally object to, like big oil, tobacco, and weapons manufacture. The more they lean into the ESG aspect, the more muted the gains tend to be in relation to S&P 500, but you might find the exchange worth it.

startfiresintl

ESG as a codified rating system and greenwashing strategy is bs- but the principal is sound... To understand who you're giving money to and what they're doing with it... because the market in some sense at least still correlates to tangible reality... From an accellerationist standpoint you might want to make more money on the collapse and really lean into the immorality of the modern market... A more honest strategy than just ignoring what all of these companies do... And if you bet right you're only helping build someone else's dystopia...

BDNackNack

If you think non-ESG is evil and ESG is good, I have a bridge to sell you.

jginvest71

I’m in Oklahoma. If you work in any form of government, can’t have ESG in state/government retirement. If you’re a county or city, can’t do business with any financial entity that provides ESG. This ended a long relationship between Stillwater (where OKState U is) and BofA.

PoolExtension5517

He can bully big corporations to drop their ESG/diversity programs and the like, and he got a lot of support from them when it appeared his easy money policies would be good for business, but when he expects them to take a hit to their profits to support his stupidity, he’s going to get a rude awakening.

Vlmlee

More context: # Key Features of the November 2022 Update The November 2022 methodology implements updates proposed in a Request for Comment published on July 13, 2022. While specific changes are not fully detailed in the available sources, the update likely refined the integration of ESG factors and enhanced the framework for assessing event risks, reflecting evolving global challenges like climate change and geopolitical tensions. The methodology also emphasizes transparency in how adjustments are applied. 

Vlmlee

LOL, part of Moody's credit rating weighting is tied to ESG. Look beyond the headline.

Nidalee2DiaOrAfk

You say ESG; I say W company if ESG is down the toilet.

Beginning_Stay_9263

Sure the sales are off the charts for the Claire Obscure team but their ESG score has to be in the toilet. I don't see a single woman of color or purple-haired non-binary on [their team](https://www.sandfall.co/team).

jnas_19

Do you really think people care about their morals when money could be made? Especially in a stock subreddit where some people pray for mass job loss so they can make 400 bucks on their puts. We buy companies that lobby, lie and support dirt cheap labor overseas. Does anyone here even take the ESG metric seriously when deciding to buy a stock? The only time investors care about morals is when it fucks with profits.

Compound369

So many different answers, but here's my two cents. You will always wing it if you don't have some sort of portfolio allocation strategy. It doesn't need to be complex, and at first, might seem worthless. Example, are you 50/50 growth and value? Are you the 60% stocks, 40% bonds? Are you 30% growth, 30% value, 30% dividend, 10% small Cap? Or, break down your categories your own way in what's meaningful for you, ESG, micro caps, mega caps, robots, AI, quantum, infrastructure, consumer staples, utilities whatever. Your strategy will help guide your, "what to buy". Because at some point you will benefit from this allocation when your portfolio is bigger. When you have a bigger portfolio, i think it's better to have years of experience with your strategy versus now trying to figure out it. A 10% loss on a large portfolio is greater discomfort than a 10% loss on a small portfolio. Learn your lessons now and try to minimize your losses.

Alpha3031

Someone else has already mentioned ESG/ethical ETFs, [this r/ETFs comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/ETFs/comments/1hbqze7/comment/m1ihonf/) from a few months ago mentions a couple, someone else basically asking the same question. Keep in mind that all of those funds have different screening criteria, some are stricter, some are looser. Stricter means more concentration obviously, and a greater chance of diverging from the broader market.

ketralnis

* Direct indexing. Some platforms support this * Short the specific companies to hedge them out, if there aren’t many * Find an index that doesn’t include them. Usually people asking this are asking how to exclude tobacco or oil companies so there are ESG indices to do that but I doubt there is one for United Healthcare

FeverTreeCloud

Last quarter, Tesla was only profitable because of carbon credit sales. Let me tell you. Carbon credits are a scam, just like all this ESG non-sense

Ernest_EA

ESG is a scam anyway

kiakosan

Are there any ETF/similar financial instruments that do the opposite of ethical investing/ESG? I want to invest in those companies

Novel-Emotion-5208

There are actually several credible bearish perspectives on Bitcoin. While the cryptocurrency has seen impressive growth and adoption, there are legitimate concerns that could impact its long-term value: 1. Regulatory crackdowns - Governments worldwide continue developing stricter regulations that could limit Bitcoin's utility and accessibility. 2. Environmental concerns - Bitcoin's proof-of-work consensus mechanism consumes enormous energy, making it vulnerable to ESG-focused investment restrictions. 3. Technical limitations - Bitcoin's transaction throughput remains relatively slow and expensive compared to newer cryptocurrencies and traditional payment systems. 4. Market concentration - A small number of "whales" hold a disproportionate amount of Bitcoin, creating potential market manipulation risks. 5. Competition - Thousands of alternative cryptocurrencies exist with potentially superior technology, some specifically designed to address Bitcoin's limitations. 6. Mainstream adoption challenges - Despite years of existence, Bitcoin still hasn't achieved widespread merchant adoption or replaced traditional currencies for everyday transactions. 7. Volatility issues - Bitcoin's price instability makes it problematic as both a currency and a stable store of value. 8. Tether and stablecoin risks - The crypto market relies heavily on questionably-backed stablecoins that could collapse if regulatory action occurs. The educated bearish view isn't that Bitcoin will necessarily go to zero, but rather that its current valuation may not be justified by its utility, adoption rate, and the significant challenges it faces moving forward.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ You are very one dimensional.

Space-Turtle88

Supporting warcrimes and russia is fine, but Anti-DEI is a no go. Some weird conflicting ethics going on there. Definitely have their own definition of ESG at that company.

IronyElSupremo

Actually there’s been companies that screen to avoid societal ills for awhile. Calvert funds started in the 1980s for those who wanted to avoid ills and vices (no tobacco, booze, gambling, and war stocks). Now there’s funds/ETFs, and even indices with as many various “ESG” screens as you want. Deeper in there’s even global “green/ESG” infrastructure and/or an energy ETFs (Blackrock/ishares). They even have major indices or combos of with various ESG screens. Their ESG S&P-based US large cap still has 450 or so stocks out of the regular 500, for example. So a lot of companies do well by basic ESG standards. The easiest is a growth fund or growth index where it’s mostly tech with highly compensated employees (note: I’m good with the whole “killer robot” thing). There’s even tech-sector index funds with companies who hire engineers, programmers, etc.. who at least have the math skills to figure out their compensation .. or even a semi-conductor index. Combine that with an ESG value [index] fund for dividends and perhaps an ESG [index] fund for the emerging markets if you are young. The ESG developed non-US funds have a lot of their tech fwiw. Bond-wise there’s even green bonds that pay modern lumberjacks to cut trees for fire breaks, and then sell the wood for whatever including biomass alt energy projects. Probably a fund like that somewhere

DckThik

The only people that benefit from not having policies that support workforce diversity, equity, and inclusion, are those associated with the corporate entity. Same goes for ESG investing and governance. Now your shareholders aren’t in alignment with your corporate entity and those who don’t support the vision of the shareholders, don’t support the business, and should be released from service.

5D-4C-08-65

Yeah, because when people ask for advice they usually ask for the best financial choice, not the best “moral choice”. Peddling an ESG fund to someone asking for the best financial choice would be dishonest (even arguably _immoral_, ironically).

Cormyster12

Go invest in ESG so some German can tell you you're saving the environment while outsourcing industry to dirty factories and slaves

ziggy029

IMO it's more effective to just invest for maximum growth and use the gains to fund the causes you support and care most about. In the meantime, there are plenty of ESG investments for you to use.

5D-4C-08-65

You are free to invest in ESG ETFs. Or even make up your own custom allocation with your own morality score. Nothing is blocking you and you’re not alone, ESG ETFs were built exactly for people like you. Not sure what your point is.

Seastep

> ESG There's still a lot of US companies in the top holdings, so just curious why this one, and not something like SPMO which is outperforming it AND has a lower ER?

zxc123zxc123

Honestly? I think BlackRock is evil enough. They are mainly just apathetic, realist, and self-interested. They actually make very few investments themselves but create offerings the market wants. In short they just go with the flow. They were all for ESG a few years ago when there was demand for it, but then go into crypto when it's offered even though their own CEO thinks it's stupid. As for stock? Blackrock actually does pretty well investors of BLK. Maybe something like BP? Destroys the world by lying about climate change in the 60-80s, continues to pump fossil fuels, pushes bogus science regarding climate change, [skimps on investments/regulations/hiring/checks which leads to the BP oil spill](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deepwater_Horizon_oil_spill), destroy the gulf of Mexico for generations, require huge cleanup effort, ruin the lives of those that live there, and ALSO CRATER INVESTOR EQUITY (BP is down over -82% since 2007 peaks).

No-Kings

Think beyond just SP500. $HYG Bonds - Diversified Junk Bonds will have the highest yield. Over 1k bonds represented rebalancing frequently. $JEPI - Good ol dividend equities, if their yield falls below downside losses, I’d be surprised. ESG Equal Weight International Index - Global Companies with solid moral leanings are less likely to be financially unstable. Equal weight will keep you most diversified. It’s not what you do in a bull market, but a bear market that makes you a good investor.

AdministrationBig839

Ok hear me out in the billionaire thing.. The billionaires running America today aren’t entrepreneurs. They’re empire managers. They didn’t invent anything. They inherited monopolies, scaled them globally. Warren Buffett buys up broken-down companies and milks them- Jeff Bezos replaced American towns with Amazon warehouses and Chinese supply chains. The Walton family killed small business across the country—one Walmart at a time. George Soros plays currency markets like a god and funds chaos for profit. Bill Gates wrapped himself around global health and education systems—not to fix them, but to control them. These guys didn’t build America. They built a system to feed off it. But a new faction rose—one that doesn’t intergrate with the previous group. Elon Musk didn’t inherit power. He earned it by bleeding for it, building rockets when NASA gave up, building electric cars when Big Auto laughed, buying Twitter to break the media narrative. Peter Thiel said no to Silicon Valley groupthink and backed the only people who dared to speak truth to power. David Sacks called out the ESG scam and corporate censorship when no one else would. Vivek Ramaswamy left the pharma cartel and started torching the sacred cows of the system—DEI, ESG, and every fake reform. These aren’t billionaires who want to keep the system. They want to disrupt it and crash it and rebuild it from the ground up. And who do they orbit? Trump. Not because he’s “one of them” in tech or innovation—but because he’s the only one with the spine to go to war with the same enemy: The corporate cartel that gutted America. Trump is their battering ram. He’s the wrecking ball they all bet on—not just for themselves, but for the janitor, the builder, the welder, and the trucker who got left behind. And that’s why the system fears him. And this time, the rebellion is funded. (Cue in john williams star wars opening theme)

AdministrationBig839

The billionaires running America today aren’t entrepreneurs. They’re empire managers. They didn’t invent anything. They inherited monopolies, scaled them globally on cheap Chinese labor, and used Wall Street to drain the life out of middle America. Warren Buffett buys up broken-down companies and milks them dry. Jeff Bezos replaced American towns with Amazon warehouses and Chinese supply chains. The Walton family killed small business across the country—one Walmart at a time. George Soros plays currency markets like a god and funds chaos for profit. Bill Gates wrapped himself around global health and education systems—not to fix them, but to control them. These guys didn’t build America. They built a system to feed off it. ⸻ But a new faction rose—one that doesn’t play by Wall Street’s rules. Elon Musk didn’t inherit power. He earned it by bleeding for it—building rockets when NASA gave up, building electric cars when Big Auto laughed, buying Twitter to break the media narrative. Peter Thiel said no to Silicon Valley groupthink and backed the only people who dared to speak truth to power. David Sacks called out the ESG scam and corporate censorship when no one else would. Vivek Ramaswamy left the pharma cartel and started torching the sacred cows of the system—DEI, ESG, and every fake reform. These aren’t billionaires who want to keep the system. They want to crash it—and rebuild it from the ground up. And who do they orbit? Trump. Not because he’s “one of them” in tech or innovation—but because he’s the only one with the spine to go to war with the same enemy: The corporate-state cartel that gutted America. ⸻ This isn’t about tax cuts. It’s about survival. Trump is their battering ram. He’s the wrecking ball they all bet on—not just for themselves, but for the janitor, the builder, the welder, and the trucker who got left behind. And that’s why the system fears him. Because this time, the rebellion is funded

AdministrationBig839

Let me try to explain my pov here- The billionaires running America today aren’t entrepreneurs. They’re empire managers. They didn’t invent anything. They inherited monopolies, scaled them globally on cheap Chinese labor, and used Wall Street to drain the life out of middle America. Warren Buffett buys up broken-down companies and milks them dry. Jeff Bezos replaced American towns with Amazon warehouses and Chinese supply chains. The Walton family killed small business across the country one Walmart at a time. George Soros plays currency markets like a god and funds chaos for profit. Bill Gates wrapped himself around global health and education systems not to fix them, but to control them. These guys didn’t build America. They built a system to feed off it. But a new faction rose—one that doesn’t play by Wall Street’s rules. Elon Musk didn’t inherit power. He earned it by bleeding for it, building rockets when NASA gave up, building electric cars when Big Auto laughed, buying Twitter to break the media narrative. Peter Thiel said no to Silicon Valley groupthink and backed the only people who dared to speak truth to power. David Sacks called out the ESG scam and corporate censorship when no one else would. Vivek Ramaswamy left the pharma cartel and started torching the sacred cows of the system—DEI, ESG, and every fake reform. These aren’t billionaires who want to keep the system. They want to crash it and rebuild it from the ground up. And who do they orbit? Trump. Not because he’s “one of them” in tech or innovation but because he’s the only one with the spine to go to war with the same enemy. The US corporate cartel. Trump is their battering ram. He’s the wrecking ball they all bet on, not just for themselves, but for the janitor, the builder, the welder, and the trucker who got left behind. And that’s why the system fears him. Because this time, the rebellion is funded

Scary-Ad5384

Well I imagine they throw out multiple type of investments trying to appeal to multiple type of investors so they can collect fees. Remember the ESG funds?

Far_Sentence_5036

$PLBY Playboy Group DD Good work from Uzi Capital here. Some good Due Dilligence (DD) . I think degens behind wendies can get behind it. I’m a de-spac microcap with a chequered history and a prolonged period of poor share price performance (-98% from 2021 highs). I’ve been ignored for years. There’s been no online write ups for 2 years. Never discussed on Microcap Club. Nothing detailed on X (Twitter). There are 2 blog write ups in 2023: one neutral, one positive - both are outdated. Investor letters: only Greenlight has mentioned me, I was described as an “unsuccessful investment” in Q3 2022. Value Investor Club: I was pitched once in 2021, as a short. Just one sell side analyst covers me and initiated a couple of months ago. I’m also a sin stock so anyone with an ESG mandate can’t own me. Yet I’m one of the most recognised consumer brands in the world, with over 70 years of heritage and a lot has changed in the last 6 months. I was distressed until a recent debt restructuring and a transformational licensing deal with a strategic partner drastically improved my financial footing. The strategic partner is an unlisted, online behemoth, with over 70m DAUs. The licensing deal means I’ll earn at least 3x my market cap in 100% margin licensing fees over the life of the contract, with further upside if the 25% net profit exceeds the $20m per year minimum guarantee. The strategic partner has a taken a board seat. This insider, who has the deepest insights into my largest profit stream, is buying 30% of the company at a 50% premium! I suspect they see the strategic value in my brand and/or expect to end up paying me materially more than the minimum guarantee, via the 25% profit share. I’m now free cash flow positive, and focused on growing my core business, which is very high quality. I’m going back to my roots. I only have one remaining non-core asset to sell and the proceeds from that should wipe out most of my debt. My remaining core business is solely focused on licensing my iconic brand. There will no M&A and after retiring debt, free cashflow will go exclusively to shareholder returns. $20m of overhead (plus $3m SBC) is all that is needed to support this. Minimum guarantees provide downside protection, accounting for 85% of today’s licensing revenues. I’m confident that I can re-invigorate growth, now that I have the bandwidth and financial resources to do so. My China business has been weighed down by both problematic licensing partners and macro headwinds. New Chinese licensing partners have now been in place for 12 months and are ramping up. Until very recently I had neglected 2 key licensing verticles: gaming & land based entertainment (LBE) which were big revenue contributors pre-covid. My management team are also excited by the monetisation potential in new untapped verticles. Licensing revenues with c.90% gross margins combined with minimal capex, interest expense, cash taxes (thanks for multiples of my market cap in NOLs) and no working capital needs means that 80% of incremental revenue growth should drop through to free cash flow. Scenario analysis, assuming I’m a debt-free pure licensing business: A) No growth: => c.7x FCF, with c.40% FCF margins. B) LBE & gaming recover to pre-covid levels: => 4-5x FCF, with c.50% FCF margins. C) China, LBE and gaming recover to 50% of pre-covid levels: => c.4x FCF, with c.55% FCF margins. D) China recovers to pre-covid levels: => c.3x FCF, with c.60% FCF margins. E) China, LBE and gaming recover to pre-covid levels: => c.2x FCF, with c.65% FCF margins I’ll let you decide what the right multiple is for a pure play licensing business, with 90% gross margin, 40-60% FCF margins, with downside protected by minimum guarantees. Who Am I?……I’m Plby Group Inc (PLBY) aka Playboy Disclaimer: The author owns securities in PLBY….DYODD, nothing written is investment advice.

twenson

In fact, I used to be often unable to catch the rhythm, and then slowly found some of their own methods.Generally I will look at a few things: the trend of the market (especially the position of the SPY and QQQ), changes in the VIX, sector rotation (such as energy, technology in the rise or fall), and the news there is no macro [risk.In](http://risk.In) the case of SPYX, it is biased towards ESG, green energy, so if the market risk sentiment rises and the energy sector weakens, I will start to stare at it, and then see if there are any technical breakdowns or rebound weakness points - buy puts at this time, the success rate will be higher!

TopherBrennan

Learned today that my mom holds ESG funds. Normies, man. (I told her she should complain to her financial advisor about one of them holding Tesla.)

LowRelative4793

Long-Term Investment Advice I’m looking to build a long-term (15–20-year) investment portfolio. Although I already hold small positions in stocks and cryptocurrency, I’d like to focus primarily on ETFs—incorporating stocks, bonds, and commodities. I am looking for highly diversified portfolio with aggresive investment approach. Since I’m not well educated on this matter, I’ve used AI tools to shortlist a few candidates, but I’d welcome additional insight or suggestions. I’m based in Europe and trade through IBKR. Here’s the allocation I’m considering: * **iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (CSPX.L)** – 40% * **Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF Distributing (VEUR)** – 16% * **Xtrackers MSCI AC Asia ex Japan ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XAXJ.L)** – 16% * **Amundi Pan Africa UCITS ETF Acc (LGQM.L)** – 8% * **Amundi Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF (EMI.L)** – 10% * **Amundi Physical Gold ETC (GLDA.L)** – 10%

Ok-Buy-9777

They follow ESG rules, and their goal is to diversify. They invest in property aswell, also currencies. Its about wealth preservation

Vanillas_Guy

Construction, gold, and manufacturing. I've got money in some gold ETFs like OUNZ and a company(GAU) that acquires gold and other minerals. Both have been doing relatively okay. The ESG fund I'm invested in(ESGC) from invesco has been doing well too. I have a China ETF(GXC) that I suspect will grow with time.

ILikeXiaolongbao

Not an ESG investor by any means but I wouldn’t put my money near any of these orgs, even if I got a good return. Some things are more important than moneyZ

Mr_Pricklepants

I've found some well-performing ESG funds, but expenses were higher. The selection criteria didn't actually make me feel good about them anyway.

Mr_Pricklepants

Look at the top 10 holdings for funds you're considering. If they're Mag 7 and/or US-based, ask yourself whether that's the sort of international investments you're looking for now. Cast a similar eye over holdings for ESG funds. I'd they're not what you want, look for something "ex US." They do exist.

andybmcc

ESG is a scam.  Bottom one is selecting companies that are expensive to own hoping that they grow fast.  The total index fund is the most sensible.

NextStepTexas

VTSNX is more broad and diversified because you get a little bit of everything. VWILX is more focused on companies that are expected to grow more than the market average. Can do one, the other, or both. Lower expense ratio is good, but growth has recently had better returns. That does NOT mean that that will continue to be true in the future. If you don't know what ESG is, it's not important for you.

Disastrous_Equal8589

Top is ESG, middle is total international market, bottom is international growth. I’d personally go with total international

VenatorFelis

Denmarks Akademiker pension fund has divested from Tesla and removed an US asset manager both over ESG concerns. This aspect of EU-US economic relations has gotten little attention so far but could also have quite some impact given the US backtracking from environmental and other regulations.

friendlytoxicity

Does anybody have information on Camber’s relation to the Scuderi group, ESG clean energy or Simson Maxwell. Just looking for information. Feel free to DM. Any leads on all companies would be helpful.

QuantumWarrior

His support of the Dems is part of why some people hate him so much, they see Blackrock as a vehicle for "woke policy" via financially supporting outfits which follow it. Their support of investment practices such as ESG is a big part of that. There's also more farfetched ideas like somehow believing Blackrock is actually worth the trillions in assets it manages which betrays a deep misunderstanding of how asset management works.

pnw_sunny

Larry is the fucktard that got us going down the ESG path for a number of years, by forcing companies to tow the ESG line through his proxy voting. completely moronic.. He has zero credibility, just another loud mouth money changer.

Dazzling_River9903

Fink is a lifelong Democrat and BlackRock one of the few companies on the Street which pushes ESG investing - and defending it against the Trump admins ‚new policies‘. He is basically the opposite of what you accuse him of.

RiseOdd123

It’s a very specific ESG fund that doesn’t exist in an ETF, I’m basically switching share classes at the same provider.

MyLuckIsTurning

🥭 ordered a federal review of state energy regulations, targeting state laws he argues unfairly restrict domestic energy (oil, gas, coal, nuclear) production. The AG will identify and challenge state policies deemed unconstitutional or illegal, especially those involving climate change, ESG initiatives, or carbon taxes. States like NY and California explicitly named for their aggressive climate laws. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/04/protecting-american-energy-from-state-overreach/

Mr_Pricklepants

Unfortunately true. When I've looked at ESG funds, many of the stakes in them still made me want to vomit. Also, many of them have much higher expense ratios than many comparable funds. That said, you won't necessarily have to sacrifice that much performance. I owned some as long as decades ago, and they actually did quite well.

Academic-Image-6097

No, I don't. I am in an All-world ETF that doesn't do ESG inclusion. But I am re-considering this lately, as you can see. Perhaps VanEck Sustainable World ETF, but it's not market cap-weighted and does not exclude fossil fuel. Maybe iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS. The choice depends on your country, your desired exclusions and your broker, I suppose. Honestly, I might just sell it all, pay off my mortgage and hopefully sleep better at night. But that's me.

uillymac

Thanks! Do you invest in any particular ESG ETF?

Academic-Image-6097

Yes, I would say it does. Owning a part of a company that manufactures weapons, machines designed for killing people, would make you complicit. I personally don't because my religion forbids murder, and for me it logically follows that I should not take part in anything that has to do with that. As others have stated in this thread, that probably hardly matters for these companies operation, as someone else will buy their stock and the influence of a single investor is very small. But I still don't buy these stocks because I am afraid of going to hell. Then there is the point that all this stock trading perpetuates capitalism, the ever increasing accumulation of wealth, the widening gap between the owners and the workers. It's just moving numbers around without actually helping anyone. And of course, any company that you might buy might still be downstream or upstream from the industries you disavow. Steel and aluminium can be used for houses and airplanes, or for guns and rockets. Most world religion have some warning against rent-seeking: "Doomed are those who accumulate houses, those who also accumulate landed property until there is no land left, and you are the only landowners remaining within the land". Isaiah 5:8 in the Bible. Or the Qur'ān: “Those who consume interest cannot stand [on the Day of Resurrection] except as one stands who is being beaten by Satan into insanity. That is because they say, ‘Trade is [just] like interest.’ But Allah has permitted trade and has forbidden interest...” Surah Al-Baqarah 2:275 On the other hand, making moral choices under capitalism is very, very hard, and you can't help it that you were born into this world, have to exchange your labour for money, and that investing is one of the few ways of saving up your money without it getting eaten by inflation. We have to look out for our own interests. There are ESG ETFs, that exclude the worst companies, like weapon manufacturers. An example is the S&P500 Catholic Values ETF, which excludes companies in the Gambling, Tobacco, Weapons industries, and excludes companies that have had incidents with child labour in the past. If they don't exclude too many companies, these ETFs can still be profitable and diversified. There are many other ETFs like this, and I would urge you to research them. Some might also exclude fossil fuel companies, for example.

DaemonTargaryen2024

You can look at ESG funds. But you’re not going to find a “morally clean” investing strategy, it just doesn’t exist.