MA

Amareisdk

9.5 will be back next week. It’s coasting an MA and 9.5 is the resistance test to the current support.

Due-Cat-6065

Micron finding that 50D MA

GlobalResolution77

MU crossed MA 50, lets rip

Eagerbeaver98

As someome who actually has made money with options please only do leaps or at least a couple months and PLEASE buy at the 200 day MA. If you bought at the 200 day youd be up bigger than any other gains you couldve had lmao.

mhughes2595

That is good. This builds upon yours. GOAL Build a repeatable system for asymmetric stock/options trades with defined downside and outsized upside, usually held 2–10 trading days. Accept concentrated bets, binary catalysts, options squeezes, bearish trades, premium selling, and occasional full losses — but only when sized so a total loss doesn't threaten next month's trading capital. POSITION SIZING (numeric — this governs everything below) Max risk per trade: no single position risks more than 2% of account equity at the pre-defined invalidation point. This is dollars-at-risk, not dollars-deployed — a defined-risk spread's max loss counts; a naked short's assignment/gap risk counts at realistic worst case, not premium collected. Size tiers map to a number, not a vibe: A+ → up to 2% risk A → up to 1.25% risk B → up to 0.75% risk C → do not trade (per original rule) Max total risk deployed at once: 8–10% of account equity across all open positions combined, even if every individual trade is A+. This is the difference between one bad trade and one bad week. Daily/weekly loss circuit breaker: at −4% account equity in a day or −8% in a week, stop opening new positions until the next review cycle (see Review Trigger below). This is a pause, not a ban — it forces the adversarial check to run on your own state, not just the trade. CORRELATION / CONCENTRATION CAP No more than 3 open positions expressing the same underlying driver (sector, single commodity, single narrative — e.g. "AI hardware," "bitcoin proxy," "meme squeeze"). Two tickers can be one bet; count the bet, not the ticker count. No more than 25% of deployed risk in one correlation bucket at a time. Before entry, state explicitly: "What does this position have in common with what I already hold?" If the answer is "the same reason it might go up," it's concentration, not diversification, even across different symbols. CORE PHILOSOPHY (unchanged, kept) The objective is not a perfect setup — take intelligent risk where potential reward materially exceeds realistic downside. Confirmation has an opportunity cost; do not require every breakout, VWAP reclaim, retest, MA signal, or momentum confirmation. Ask: what do we give up by waiting, and how much asymmetry do we lose? If entering earlier with smaller size offers better risk/reward than waiting for textbook confirmation, favor the earlier entry with better expected value. Do not confuse higher probability with better expected value. ADVERSARIAL RISK CHECK (unchanged — this is the strongest part of the original) For every serious candidate, try to disprove the trade first. Classify the biggest reason not to take it: FATAL — breaks the thesis; pass. MANAGEABLE — real risk, controllable through sizing, structure, entry, expiration, hedge, or invalidation. NORMAL UNCERTAINTY — uncertainty already compensated for by upside; do not demand certainty. Cost of waiting counts as a risk category too. Do not recommend a trade because premium, leverage, IV, or potential return looks exciting. Explain why the payoff exists — who is on the other side of this trade, and why. ANALYZE THE WHOLE OPPORTUNITY Company: growth, contraction, dilution, balance sheet, management, distress. Mispricing: is price wrong, and why — overreaction, misunderstood guidance, temporary bad news, improving fundamentals, valuation disconnect, underestimated catalyst, or volatility mispricing. Catalyst: what could force repricing — earnings, guidance, analysts, products, contracts, regulation, M&A, restructuring, debt resolution, squeeze dynamics, sector momentum, unusual options activity, news. Potential: realistic and stretch upside, probability-weighted outcomes, whether options improve or dilute convexity. Ask, quantitatively: if right, how much can we make (in R-multiples of risk, not just dollars)? If wrong, how much do we lose (must equal the sizing number above, not an estimate made after the fact)? What would have to be true for the market to be right and me wrong? TECHNICALS = ENTRY TOOLS, NOT VETO MACHINES (unchanged) Support/resistance, VWAP, EMA20, SMA50/200, RSI, volume, gaps, and trend structure are for entry, sizing, and risk/reward — not automatic overrides of a compelling thesis. Do not say "wait for VWAP reclaim" as a substitute for stating what evidence would actually invalidate the thesis. ENTRY MODES (unchanged, kept) ANTICIPATORY — downside definable, thesis compelling, near support, upside or waiting materially reduces asymmetry. Start smaller (cap at B-tier size regardless of conviction — anticipatory entries are structurally less confirmed). CONFIRMED — confirmation materially improves probability without materially consuming upside. CHASE — avoid after large moves unless new information raises fair value or the thesis materially re-rates. Size down one full tier from what conviction alone would suggest. OPTIONS — DEFINED RULES, NOT JUST QUESTIONS Cash-secured puts are available, not the default. Use them only when premium is attractive relative to collateral and you would want the underlying at the effective entry price (strike minus premium). Minimum quantitative bar to sell a CSP: state the annualized return on collateral at the bid, not the ask. If it doesn't clear a number you set in advance (e.g. 15% annualized), the premium isn't attractive — it's noise. Do not sell premium solely because IV is high. High IV without a defined reason (event, dislocation, squeeze) is often high IV for a reason you haven't found yet. No naked/unbounded short options risk. Every short option position has either a long option hedge, a defined max loss, or is explicitly a cash-secured put where assignment is an acceptable outcome, not a tail risk. Earnings/event binaries require explicit, separate approval — not silent inclusion because the setup otherwise looks clean. State the event and the expected move before entry, every time. SQUEEZES / BEARISH TRADES (unchanged) Evaluate short interest, float, days-to-cover, positioning, sentiment, and liquidity. A mediocre company can still be a good squeeze trade — that's a different thesis than a quality thesis, and should be labeled as such so it isn't held past the squeeze on hope. NEWS + SENTIMENT (unchanged) Always check current news for serious candidates. Determine what changed, whether priced in, analyst/institutional reaction, and relevant Reddit/social sentiment — treat crowd sentiment as a data point on positioning, not as confirmation of thesis quality. HOLDING / SELLING — WITH A DEFINED EXIT, NOT JUST A QUESTION Do not sell solely because a position turns red. Ask: did the thesis break, or did price simply move against us? But this question needs a pre-committed answer, set at entry: Invalidation level, stated in price or in fact-pattern terms, before entry. "I'll know it's wrong if X happens" — not decided after it happens. Do not refuse an early entry; only refuse an early exit on the first pullback if the invalidation level hasn't been hit. Do not average down blindly. Only add when thesis remains intact, mispricing improves, invalidation is clear, and total risk is still within the position's sizing cap above — averaging down that busts the 2% cap is a new trade decision, not a continuation of the old one. DO NOT LET ME OVERRIDE THE ANALYSIS (unchanged, kept as-is — this is good) Do not reverse a conclusion because I push back. Change it only if evidence changed. If I am wrong, tell me. Never place or submit a trade without my explicit approval. Added consequence: if a trade is placed without explicit approval, or a hard rule above is broken (sizing cap, correlation cap, no-naked-options, earnings-approval), log it and treat the next candidate's review as mandatory C-tier regardless of quality, until a review happens. A broken rule pauses the system, not just that trade. SCANNING (unchanged) Scan broadly for catalysts, post-earnings setups, temporary selloffs, mispricing, momentum/reversals, squeezes, unusual options activity, speculative small caps, and bearish setups. REQUIRED OUTPUT, FOR EVERY SERIOUS CANDIDATE Company quality · Why now · Mispricing · Catalyst · Potential (realistic + stretch, in R-multiples) · Downside (in dollars and % of account) · Technicals · Entry type (anticipatory/confirmed/chase) · Cost of waiting · Instrument · Options quality when relevant (IV, delta, spread/liquidity, OI, breakeven) · Size tier and dollar risk (explicit number) · Correlation bucket and current bucket exposure · Portfolio impact · Biggest reason NOT to trade · Risk classification (FATAL/MANAGEABLE/NORMAL UNCERTAINTY) · Targets · Time horizon · Alerts (exact prices) · Existing positions: BUY MORE/HOLD/REDUCE/SELL/EXIT · New trades: ENTER NOW/STARTER POSITION/ENTER ON PULLBACK/ENTER ON BREAK/WATCH/PASS. Be decisive. NO-TRADE RULE (unchanged) Say NO TRADE when there is no edge, risk cannot be defined, upside is insufficient, positions are badly priced, liquidity/assignment risk is poor, the move is excessively extended, correlation is excessive, or the thesis is mostly hope. Do not say NO TRADE simply because a setup is imperfect. REVIEW TRIGGER (new) Re-review this entire framework — not just the trade in front of you — whenever any of the following happens: the daily/weekly circuit breaker fires, a hard rule is broken, or account equity crosses a new $X,000 milestone. The review asks one question: did the rules fail, or did I fail to follow them? Fix the rule only in the first case. FINAL PRINCIPLE (unchanged) Optimize for: expected value × asymmetry × confirmation, not certainty × confirmation. At the current price, are we being paid enough for the risk? If yes, take intelligent risk. If uncertainty is the problem, size smaller. If waiting destroys the asymmetry, do not wait simply to feel safer.

kryptonite848

This is the instructions I currently use: GOAL Build a repeatable system for asymmetric stock/options trades with defined downside and outsized upside, usually over 2–10 trading days. I accept volatility, concentrated bets, binary catalysts, options, squeezes, bearish trades, premium selling, and occasional full losses when sized properly. Avoid lottery tickets, blind averaging down, hype-only trades, chasing, poor liquidity, and unclear invalidation. Use intraday charts mainly for entry quality. Always use @Robinhood agent when relevant. Review positions, buying power, orders, total risk, and correlated exposure. CORE PHILOSOPHY The objective is not a perfect setup. Take intelligent risk when potential reward materially exceeds realistic downside. Confirmation has an opportunity cost. Do not require every breakout, VWAP reclaim, retest, MA signal, or momentum confirmation. Ask: What do we gain by waiting, and how much asymmetry do we lose? If entering earlier with smaller size offers better risk/reward than waiting for textbook confirmation, favor the earlier entry. Do not confuse higher probability with better expected value. ADVERSARIAL RISK CHECK For every serious candidate, try to disprove the trade. Always state: BIGGEST REASON NOT TO TAKE THIS TRADE: Classify it: FATAL — breaks the thesis; PASS. MANAGEABLE — real risk controllable through sizing, structure, entry, expiration, hedge, or invalidation. NORMAL UNCERTAINTY — uncertainty already compensated for by upside; do not demand certainty. Compare risk severity with expected upside and the cost of waiting. Do not recommend a trade because premium, leverage, IV, or potential return looks exciting. Explain why that payoff exists. ANALYZE THE WHOLE OPPORTUNITY COMPANY Classify as good, mediocre, distressed, turnaround, or trading vehicle. Consider growth, balance sheet, dilution, management, and distress. MISPRICING Ask whether price is wrong. Look for overreactions, misunderstood guidance, temporary bad news, improving fundamentals, valuation disconnects, underestimated catalysts, turnaround potential, or volatility mispricing. CATALYST Identify what could force repricing: earnings, guidance, analysts, products, contracts, regulation, M&A, restructuring, debt resolution, squeeze dynamics, sector momentum, unusual options activity, or news. POTENTIAL Estimate realistic/stretch upside, downside, holding period, probability-weighted outcomes, and whether options improve convexity. Ask: If right, how much can we make? If wrong, how much do we lose? What would have to happen for the market to be right? TECHNICALS = ENTRY TOOLS, NOT VETO MACHINES Use support/resistance, VWAP, EMA20, SMA50/200, RSI, volume, gaps, and trend structure for entry, invalidation, adds, exits, and risk/reward. Technicals should not automatically override a compelling thesis. Do not automatically say “wait for VWAP/breakout/confirmation/retest.” Compare early entry with confirmed entry. If uncertainty is the problem, reduce size rather than rejecting the trade. ENTRY MODES ANTICIPATORY — Downside definable, thesis compelling, near support, upside large, or waiting materially reduces asymmetry. Start smaller. CONFIRMED — Confirmation materially improves probability without consuming too much upside. CHASE — Avoid after large moves unless new information raises fair value, momentum is the thesis, or substantial upside remains. POSITION SIZING A+ — Exceptional asymmetry + defined risk. Larger speculative sizing. A — Strong opportunity. Normal speculative sizing. B — High potential, meaningful uncertainty. Reduced size. C — Poor asymmetry, unclear thesis, hype, or undefined risk. PASS. Use size to manage uncertainty. Do not reject B setups solely because they are uncertain if potential is exceptional. PORTFOLIO RISK Check buying power, capital/premium at risk, correlation, concentration, overlapping catalysts, and whether one market move could damage several positions. OPTIONS Options are encouraged when they improve asymmetry. Evaluate strike, expiration, delta, IV, expected move, liquidity/spread, volume/OI, theta, breakeven, catalyst timing, and stock target. Give the thesis enough time. If options are overpriced, use shares. Do not buy an option merely because it is cheap. Ask: What move does the underlying need, by when, and what happens if direction is right but timing or IV is wrong? CASH-SECURED PUTS / PREMIUM SELLING Cash-secured puts are available, not the default. Use them only when premium is attractive relative to collateral AND I would want the underlying at the effective entry price. Check earnings/events, liquidity/spread, volume/OI, IV/event risk, delta, % OTM, breakeven, assignment cost, return on collateral, correlation, and account fit. Ask: Would I actually want to own this company at the breakeven price? If not, reject the put regardless of premium. Do not sell premium solely because IV is high. No naked/unbounded short-option risk. Consider a small defined-cost hedge on unusually risky positions only if it meaningfully improves the payoff without destroying asymmetry. SQUEEZES / BEARISH TRADES For squeezes evaluate short interest, float, days to cover, volume, catalyst, positioning, sentiment, and liquidity. A mediocre company can still be a good trade. NEWS + SENTIMENT Always check current news for serious candidates. Determine what changed, whether priced in, analyst/institutional reaction, and relevant Reddit/social sentiment. HOLDING / SELLING Do not sell solely because a position turns red. Ask: Did the thesis break, or did price simply move against us? Do not refuse an early entry, buy only after confirmation, then sell on the first pullback. AVERAGING DOWN Do not blindly average down. Add only when thesis remains intact, mispricing improves, invalidation is clear, and total risk is acceptable. DO NOT LET ME OVERRIDE THE ANALYSIS Do not reverse a conclusion because I push back. Change it only if evidence changes. If I am wrong, tell me. If analysis was too conservative, acknowledge it and adjust. Never place or submit a trade without my explicit approval. SCANNING Scan broadly for catalysts, post-earnings setups, temporary selloffs, mispricing, momentum/reversals, squeezes, unusual options activity, volatility mispricing, cash-secured puts, sector rotations, speculative small caps, and bearish setups. REQUIRED OUTPUT For serious candidates provide: Company quality Why now Mispricing Catalyst Potential: realistic + stretch upside Downside Technicals Entry type: anticipatory / confirmed / chase Cost of waiting Instrument Options quality when relevant: IV, delta, spread/liquidity, OI, breakeven Sizing Portfolio impact Invalidation Biggest reason NOT to trade Risk classification: FATAL / MANAGEABLE / NORMAL UNCERTAINTY Targets Time horizon Alerts: exact prices Existing positions: BUY MORE / HOLD / REDUCE / SELL / EXIT New trades: ENTER NOW / STARTER POSITION / ENTER ON PULLBACK / ENTER ON BREAK / WATCH / PASS Be decisive. NO TRADE RULE Say NO TRADE — when there is no edge, risk cannot be defined, upside is insufficient, options are badly priced, liquidity/assignment risk is poor, the move is excessively extended, correlation is excessive, or the thesis is mostly hype. Do not say NO TRADE simply because a setup is imperfect. FINAL PRINCIPLE Optimize for: EXPECTED VALUE × ASYMMETRY × OPPORTUNITY not: CERTAINTY × CONFIRMATION At the current price, are we being paid enough for the risk? If yes, take intelligent risk. If uncertainty is the problem, size smaller. If the thesis is the problem, do not trade. If waiting destroys the asymmetry, do not wait simply to feel safer.

croissant_and_cafe

You haven’t been in the market very long. There are some stocks that stayed flat for a decade. Disney, ATT, INTC. It’s always a good idea to get out of loser stocks. If a stock has turned bearish past the 50, I consider selling. If it’s past the 200 MA I sell. Aside from that, daily fluctuations shouldn’t cause you to sell. Follow your strategy.

Ok-Nose29

$NBIS now back above 21-50-100 MA

Eagerbeaver98

Dude no one cares how many depreciating assets you have LOL it still is a value trap, the only reason any stock gaining atm is because everything bounced near the 200 day MA. It doesnt change the fact all of them have been value traps. None of this is fundamental except MSFT cloud revenue for once in 3 years has actually be good. Its cute youre trying to seek my validation though, kinda pathetic moreso though. Everyone is making money right now so I dont get why you act like youve done something 😂

PandaDuckMonster

Although I preach diversification, I've never really done it myself. Realistically I've always been 95% stock, 5% ETF Starting from 2017-2018, I mainly had 5-10 that I bought: AMD at $11/share NVDA at $22/share (post split) MU at $45/ share, sold for like $55/share after holding a year (still kicking my own ass on this one) V at around $100/share MA at around $250/share NFLX - don't remember, but I actually sold this to buy the NVDA, which is probably one of the better decisions in life PYPL & DIS - LOL these were fails. I bought them before they rallied, watch them reach the top, then drop all the way down, still had gains, but not as much as if I sold the top. Given how much NVDA has risen though, I am selling them from time to time to diversify into an global ETF. I'd say I'm at around 85/15 now. Trying to diversify more now. I've made my money, now I'm trying to keep it. maybe down to like 70/30 or 60/40 stocks/ETF?

Keter_Regretter

whoa we bounced off the 200MA instead of the VWAP that was intense idk if I can take much more excitement today

Redbird232425

56 I remember the qqq craze I own mostly individual stocks kinda happy about it MSFT 20 cat 38 Nxpi 16 MU 5 Nvda I bought with pocket change never dreamed glw 19 apple 17 and 50 axon 50 Lilly 18 and 50ish MA 25 cost I could keep going 95% single stocks

WorldlyWar2143

https://preview.redd.it/3qdxt8ndizhh1.png?width=2575&format=png&auto=webp&s=e39164741146b9abeae71108fb7ffe1b1b3fd16f last time QQQ looked like this, MACD aimed up, holding against 200MA into resistance, high RSI QQQ ripped from 610 to 740 do what you want w that, im staying long

DeltaP2SavetheE

Lol, everyone here in MA blowing money making it rain like there’s no tomorrow. New whips and boats everywhere, extravagant vacations, everyone I know balling hard as fuck, economy ripping

WordsHappenedHere

What do you think algos use to trade? Vibes? They use moving averages, support and resistance, key levels, etc. All of that is surfaced by simple TA. Why do you think stocks often bounce off a 7 ema or 200d MA? Think like a computer

Dangerous_Rip5083

NYSE: MA to the moon tmrw trust

Select-Decision_83

Actually disagree a bit here 50 and 200 MA still matter for context even on 0DTE. If price is sitting right at the 200 MA you know there's gonna be a reaction there, institutions are watching those levels.

longGERN

MA

dismendie

Buffet mentioned years before tech compensations that public companies were already deceiving investor by dilution it was just not accounted for in the past. So the rules change and now we see the dilutions and we see the buybacks. Neutral isn’t as bad as 3% dilution YoY. How come the big buyback companies weren’t mentioned did Apple reduce share count or they were net neutral or BRK or Visa or MA… or Google over the longer run… Amazon was worth 160 on the top end of 2022 and like 80s on the lower end. Today it’s 270. 70% delta from the highs of 2022 and 12.5% dilution… not bad for some dilution…

SpecialistTutor4451

8-12 max. I’d keep MA, V, KO, Google, COST, LMT, CVX, LLY.

sami_regard

QQQ touching the 50 day MA is either we enter half year of bull market or we dump to much lower than last week

0RIGINAL_C0PY

>With everything going on in the Iran–US conflict the market has been getting hit hard lately SPY: $757 SPY ATH: $760 SPY 50day MA: $745 🤔

BullMarketBound

The 50-day MA lining up right at your $7.30-7.40 support zone is doing a lot of the work here, moving averages only matter as support when actual volume built up around that price too, and you've got both, so that zone is probably real rather than coincidental. Where I'd push back a little is treating the meme-squeeze high as a resistance level with the same weight as your volume-based zones, squeeze highs get set by forced short covering, not by anyone actually deciding $9 was fair value, so it's a weaker level than the $7.55-7.65 zone that formed from actual trading over weeks. Earnings context matters more than the chart here anyway, this call covers a quarter that ended before the new leadership even had a full runway, so a soft print doesn't necessarily kill the thesis and a good one doesn't necessarily confirm it either, you're really waiting on Q3 and Q4 for the real signal. Holding above $7.30 through the print without breaking down is the actual tell, not what the headline number says.

Moepenmoes

Feels good having my cash in MSFT and MA for months already, keep pumping my lovies, take your time 😎

meity-nick

I'm sorry, maybe I did them wrong - I tried to set up a 50-day moving average and a 200-day moving average. I am not ignoring the fact that almost all the candles are below the lines - what I find interesting is the candles haven't been this close to the 200-day MA line since the end of 2024 and we haven't seen upward movement in the 50-day MA since then either. If any there is any stability in the price, the 200-day MA should level out for the first time since it tipped downward in Aug 2023. It definitely pumped, and I am not saying it won't dip below $7, it just feels like maybe it found the bottom and if the new leadership can do even half of what they did at Potbelly's, this could be a $15-$20 stock in a year or two.

McGooferson

Did a valuation project on NFLX for most of the last semester of masters, fundamental model (pre split, divide all my numbers by 10) put it around $240, I thought that was too low and TA looked like monthly 50 MA was a good bet ($600), split ensured it, and that was what I went with for the presentation (manipulated model to bring it up). As others have stated, there’s not much room for growth, unless China unbans it but that’s highly unlikely as China develops its own tech sector instead of relying on America. Biggest indicator was when the talking points became cracking down on password sharing (they ran out of people willing to pay and needed to force freeloaders to pay them). My bullish talking points were that it had become a consumer utility (new pundit talking point I’ve noticed recently) and would maintain revenue streams to a large degree, AI could lessen the acquisition costs of original content, and eventually we would see a consolidation of the streaming industry where NFLX already holds a majority of market share and would end up with a majority of the licensing deals from other content companies (has begun but nowhere near the endgame of this prediction). Needs a dividend though to maintain a price floor. More recent TA shows head/shoulders putting the monthly 200 MA into play ($30 post split) would be interesting under that. Outside of swing trades wouldn’t recommend, but this isn’t financial advice. Good luck.

DRM842

But for real are you just looking for stocks that dip below their 50MA?

account-names

The G in MA\*\* stands for Grim

Serenaded

It's over when crypto pumps and ends it's bearish MA, til then this is just noise.

Direct-Spot-1693

I do but only about once a week. I just scan for the LE model on the mag7 daily, then ride moment after the PDH/PMH breaks and it retests the 8MA. Like a 80% win rate. 30% stop loss.

GeneralWartHogWash

Thanks. Are you doing it based on technicals? If so what’s your setup? 5 minute candle? Couple MA and VWAP?

Allout-Okarun

These past three months I’ve been on a roll and it’s a mix of indicators I use, geopolitics, earnings season, and AI cloud monsters. Amazon was so obvious to me too but again, risk tolerance prevented me from dumping the rest of my liquidity into it at the same time as aapl puts. I’ve been burned so many times on earnings calls I stayed away from them for years. AAPL was comfortably sailing above the 50 and 200 MA and I felt it was time it would come down to that range.

Vast_Cricket

I own both MA and V in my financial sector. Visa (V) currently offers a slightly better balance of growth, stability, and yield, while Mastercard (MA) has stronger long-term growth potential but higher volatility**.** My cost basis for both is a fraction of current trade prices. More like 20% to 35%. To me they both are buy and forget stocks. I also own UNH only because children had UNH and Atena insurance. Both I have cashed out gains and left some for cushioning. My strategy is having all sectors and own selective international etfs.

cageslutjoanna

I bought UNH after the drop not because i liked the stock but because I really like how they treat their customers. (I'm not american) Jokes aside, whenever these systemically-important, cash-rich dividend-monster quasi-monopolies have a huge drop, like COST / UNH / ASML recently did, it's a signal to buy the dip. They will always bounce back long term - if they don't, it's because something has fundamentally changed about how the economy they operate in. V and MA have nowhere else to go, they have no organic growth left - credit is becoming more expensive as we are in a cycle of rate increases. Fundamentally - any lending company will have decreased profits when rates increase. When rates increase, consumers spend less because they have to spend more on their mortgage. It costs the lender more to borrow money, and people watch out more for fees. Payments companies thrive in rate cutting environments because people can see that their money is better spent now than later. So if you're buying them you are expecting them to either find a way to nickle and dime customers more, or you are betting on them finding a way to increase their offerings via integration with stablecoins. Some of the smaller payments companies have a long way to grow. If you're in V/MA it's because youve been in them a long time and like your tasty dividends.

g3tr1ghttt

Still don’t see how your moves make logical sense. Energy prices were significantly higher last Friday than at the beginning of Iran fiasco. Going into last weekend broader tech selloff was ramping up as well as Iran situation, and it did accelerate into the week. GOOGL going against the broader trend was paradoxical rather than consequential. Also don’t see a “high note” in GOOGL closing a notch below MA50 resistance, there is room to run.

bigheadstrikesagain

From keplerfusion.com 5. Prototype Milestones Version 9 Texatron (Midland, TX): 1 MA coil current, 800 µs rise 10 keV average plasma temperature on single-shot metrics Repetition rate under active tests toward 10 Hz Closed-loop capacitor-bank recharge via recovered pulse energy Diagnostics: Thomson scattering, neutron/gamma scintillation, and Rogowski pickup loops confirm energy balance and confinement times matching predictive MHD codes.

Mighty-HeaIthy

Yes, 20MA

Mr_Snow___

does anyone know if the MA 43.7 / MA 328.9 krosskrised today?

GenesGeniesJeans

Despite yesterday’s relief rally, nothing is structurally different from earlier this week. Nasdaq 20MA a/d ratio < 1. Hedge fund leverage/debt near all time highs. Oil worries not going away. IG credit spreads starting to tick up. Yields high.

kwijibokwijibo

I prefer SUG-MA

Next_gen_investor

Even so it doesn’t matter WS is starting to look at all pic and shovel companies as a ticking time bomb as ai still hasn’t matured nearly enough to fatten their pockets more than it’s drained them. It why all semi companies are down SMH had dropped over 25% and fell below big MA against the SPY. The only reason this isn’t a bull trap is cause there’s no way you can call a \~5% recovery after a >50% drop a bull case confirmation. This isn’t a trap it’s the market pulling back to a huge demand zone that’s it. If it sandisk goes past 1600$ then there starts to be a bull case but you also have to see huge gamma to the upside in terms of options and volume

Thumbszilla

MSOS completed a MA 21 / MA 100 death cross today. The last time that happened in February it fell an additional 22ish%.

Delicious_Put_5857

20 MA is 50 pts up, todays vwap is 50 pts down, could have to withstand a 100 point range before u even get any info on whether ur retarded or not

AllCapNoBrake

The 50/200 MA Death Cross is upon r/Bitcoin again. Get them $horts ready (again) https://preview.redd.it/j286gxuqmegh1.png?width=393&format=png&auto=webp&s=be41b3bfa39934ba94cb0b1c1f8a804e4a5a278a

New_Routine9021

for Ema try the 50 and 200 day MA,usually 200MA are good entry points for most stocks as long as they are trending upwards, and use RSI if it’s above 60 don’t touch it as it’s just fomo and if it’s RSI is under 30 is usually good (as long as fundamental for the company are good), so far these have worked for me but I only do LEAPS and selling options

Eagerbeaver98

Id say if you cam afford leaps it may not be so bad to buy in even right now, things are cheap like some actual good companies like MU and sndk. Overpriced companies like arm dont have as much growth as their price before though. Id say you want to still scale in a bit, 25% to 50% in shares or 1 to 2 year options. Sometimes the index funds bounce just below 200 day MA 1 day sometimes it needs 200 day weekly average. Sometimes really good companies may bounce sooner like their 100 day MA 1 day like MU in march 31st. 

TheOriginalBushToad

NVDA back to the 50D MA eow...

Difficult-Cup-4445

What the fuck is this guy talking about? NQ/ES are nearly down to the 30 Week MA.

Kind-Airport1040

Nasdaq is down 10% a month. 50% of the stocks are below 50MA. wtf are you on about?

Thumbszilla

GTBIF had a MA 21 / MA 100 death cross yesterday. The last time that happened in February it fell an additional 17ish%, and the death cross before that in November it fell about 20%. MSOS is now 2 cents from a MA 21 / MA 100 death cross. The last time that happened in February it fell an additional 22ish%.

i_empathetic

The fact that KOSPI is mostly just chopping around... this is the least volatile start to the trading session they've had in a week. It's also right around its 200-day MA. Wishing Korea bros a bit of a support floor.

Polysorbate800

Hang Seng closed well above the 200d MA, meaningful pullbacks are damn near non-existent at this point, great strength u/agentorange001 u/daddyphatstacks So it's now above every major daily, weekly, and monthly moving average, with a bullsih cross recently completed https://preview.redd.it/qy2hm7npe8gh1.png?width=1791&format=png&auto=webp&s=c4b22e42a80a4af5a05efca823ae95bcc03c911e

JuicyJohnny69

you're supposed to use the underlying to valuate the moving averages, but yeah soxx under 100 MA

guy_cloutier

SOXL under the 200 MA. Very very bad.

Eagerbeaver98

It hasnt gone toward 200 day MA yet but it may not need to be. September worst month of the year. This is a midterm election year. Fed interest rate decisions tosay. September may be the bottom

dronix111

Of course there can be both. Forward PE is a made up number. Those earnings dont exist yet, they're just guesses. Btw., the bubble is already popping in some sectors like memory. The stocks are down 50% and havent even reached their 200D MA yet, or are still at prices last seen only a couple months ago. That is literally what a bubble is in sectors. You're seeing it right now in front of you. If they continue down another 20%, 30%, whatever, that is literally a bubble pop. I guess what you see by definition as a bubble pop is an entire index collapse like it did in 2000. We won't see that, cause the index is more diversified now. But individual sectors are different.

teh_herper

Daily 200MA: 508

GeneralWartHogWash

What’s the 200MA level on MU ?

NilliamWylander

here comes the 200MA bounce

Work-Sport-Fun

Same. Average price sitting at $830 -- but I'm starting to sell in the $1000-1050 range just because the MA200 is at $1k. I'll take a small haircut on the shares I have left because I think it'll get back to $1500+. When I say "the shares I have left" .... my Broker liquidated about half my holdings at $1650. Could have bought a decent used car for how much I lost from that liquidation. lmao. I was kind of happy it went to $2300, and was like "thank you Mr Broker" ... but now I'm sick to see how fast it came back down. lol

longGERN

Who shall I take out for dinner from my MA and V gains?

Allout-Okarun

I personally bought puts about 15 mins ago. It’s a huge risk play but I see it going down to meet to 50 and 200 MA’s. I could be wrong

StophJS

I think a hope is that it's valuation seems reasonable, it seems to be bouncing off its 200 day MA and there's already a general light cycling back toward the big established names. There's a ton of open interest on the Sept 350 calls.

TotalInstruction

I’ve got some leaps that go out to December 2028. I’ll sell if the underlying falls below the 200 day MA or if the options have about a year left, if I haven’t reach my target profit by then.

Crazy_Donkies

Personally I'm seeing quite a few stocks at their 200 MA \[and their 200MAs are on an uptrend\], growing revenues 25%, sold out to 2028, and only have 30 - 35 forward PEs. WMT has a 36. I've started buying dips: CRDO, AVGO, NVDA today. I think things can still go lower, but that's fine, I'm 20% cash.

Moepenmoes

Why do MSFT, AAPL, V and MA always go up when semis are down, and the other way around? I won't complain because they're at least keeping my port flat instead of red, but I'm not going up either 😐

i_empathetic

Time to buy Micron is when it goes to touch the 200-day MA, then go hard

Nic12312

Thanks retail for being shaken out. Weekly tap of the 20 MA on SMH, QQQ - nas 100… just in time for end of month mark up. Thanks for the shakeout bimbo 🐻

Half-Sole

Sure, do a call when MA200 crossed the MA50.

Spiritual-Goat-8711

Oil bouncing right at the 50 MA tells you this price is just computers....as a man once said "they don't know what the fuck they are doing"

Several-Village5814

21 MA crossed over 50 MA, we are in a downtrend on QQQ

PandaOk4050

Bro just hold it. On day candles it just touched 100 day MA and instantly bounced above it. Positive earnings report will send it to the moon.  The only people in the red are short term buyers. 20 day MA people are still up 15%. It tested the 100 day MA and bounced upwards. 360 day MA people are up 25%.  Its a temp downturn. 

taiyab-raja

I just went on Trump’s truth social account for the first time ever. OH MA LAWD

PandaOk4050

My chart is litterly day candles and 5 MA's. 7 , 20, 60, 100 and 360. Absolutely amazing. Shows you different references of all the traders.  If I good company is trading near 360 line, and the other lines are above current price, a catalyst will send it off to the highs within weeks. (LMT) If price is above all MA's and longterm traders arent selling off, thats when you get the new highs (Roku , O). 

Independent-Tree-985

What MA'AM needed was somebody who was tired of their minimum wage retail job to explain why its temper tantrum was not okay

Win11141

Clarity Act update; Not passing as per this week (Thursday 23 Jul) Based on publically available Intel. Republicans: 51 yes, 2 no Democrats: 2 yes, 45 no Required : 60 Votes Republicans (Likely Yes unless noted): John Thune (R-SD) - Yes Cynthia Lummis (R-WY) - Yes Kevin Cramer (R-ND) - Yes Bernie Moreno (R-OH) - Yes Tim Scott (R-SC) - Yes All other Republicans (48 total) - Yes Republican Likely No: Josh Hawley (R-MO) - Likely No Rand Paul (R-KY) - Likely No Democrats (Public Yes - Conditional): Ruben Gallego (D-AZ) - Yes (conditional) Angela Alsobrooks (D-MD) - Yes (conditional, recent criticism) Democrats (Public No / Opposition): Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV) - No Cory Booker (D-NJ) - No John Hickenlooper (D-CO) - No Mark Warner (D-VA) - No Raphael Warnock (D-GA) - No Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) - No Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) - No Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) - No Chris Murphy (D-CT) - No Jeff Merkley (D-OR) - No Jack Reed (D-RI) - No All other Democrats (\~35 total) - No / Leaning No Tally Summary: 53 Yes, 47 No (short of 60)

bulzome9

Reversal at down sloping 20MA hourly on sp500 was predictable. but I cashed out after 20 points for a nice scalp. good job to those of you that are still in the trade I think your patience will pay off and we break that 7376 low in the next 2 trading days.

bulzome9

come on just a little higher so we can short the down sloping 20MA hourly on sp500. patience of a lion. would be annoying if the market drops before we get there.

Delicious_Put_5857

shitcoin 20 MA test :popcorn:

Life-Trade-6514

QQQ daily moving average inversed last week. Spy has yet to do so and is constantly bouncing off of it. QQQ dragging (red) MA is around 712 and its bullish lag is around 710. I would expect it to hit its red drag of 712 before we see a reversal pushing back through both its bullish and bearish MA. If it can have its bullish momentum cross over its bearish momentum then we should see a push upwards for another crazy ripper. Until then I am leaning bearish. Sorry Bulls. I'll be back on your side soon hopefully.

Pete_Jones228

A few things I'm watching: • Price getting back above the 20-day MA. • Holding above support instead of just bouncing because it's oversold. • A higher low followed by a higher high to show the downtrend is actually breaking. It's definitely on my watchlist. I'm just more comfortable buying strength than guessing where the bottom is.

The_Last_Otter

What did you land on for your exit? Are you using a key chart level or MA, or just a certain distance from short strike? Yea I’ve definitely thought diamond handing eventually will burn me, just don’t want to see a months worth of gains wiped out in a day that’s my worst fear. Still working on finding the best exit plan that doesn’t create too many unnecessary losers

Significant_Speed854

Ugh we don't get those in MA either.

Significant_Speed854

Ugh we don't get those in MA

RandomC6

You need to relax and zoom out. The overall trend is still intact. On a factor view we are seeing Momentum unwind currently, while quality and low risk started to outperform (look AAPL, V, MA, etc). This upcoming earnings cycle willl probably show that hyperscaler CapEx speending is still high and Semis are still profitable well into 2027 and beyond.

w8w8dont

SPY is clearly in a 50 day MA uptrend with bounces off the pythagorean retracement.

Feeling-Clerk312

When bouncing off of a major 200 MA people get a little panicky and $ is always a bit higher…. I set alerts and it seems to work out 🤷‍♀️. Strong stable stocks, blue chips etc always seem to recover quickly too so… I just keep doing what I’m doing.

Feeling-Clerk312

Yes, and you have a defined risk/loss on a BPS. Immediately after you’re filled, go in and put a stop at 50, 60, 70, 80% whatever you’re comfortable with. When you get more comfortable, scale up, in contracts, but one more thing I do, is I screen on finviz for solid stocks/etfs and typically get a list of 10-16 that I then go through any news, earnings coming up etc, then if all looks good I set alerts on my TV charts for when the underlying is near or bouncing off the 50/200 MA…. Strong/major support levels, check one more time, then it’s go time. I also do 14-24 DTEs…. Good luck. Don’t listen to the negativity, everyone learns differently and at their own pace. Go slow n steady 👍

Throwaway37620

Why is sandisk just bouncing off the 20 day MA

piszczel

I'm buying boring stuff like MA, SPGI, CSU. It's working well so far.

sami_regard

Jan 10, 2025 is today. long for 30 days, and we dump below 200 day MA

sami_regard

Jan 10, 2025 is today. long for 30 days, and we dump below 200 day MA

Delicious_Put_5857

they gotta run these 20 MA 50 MA ES stops for sure

MarthaJulietta

I think you can look at the chart and think the market might be rolling over or at least pulling back another 5% to test the 200MA. Things can deteriorate from here rather quickly through oil shock, US political turmoil, AI fears, etc, or some confluence of factors.

NecessaryEmployer488

All I can say, is that I looked at my charts last night and it looks like we did not hold the 50-day MA and there is a lot of air down to the 200-day. I think we won't go there right away. But there are things to look at. 1) pre-earnings sell off are normally followed by a rally later into the earning season. Timing is about a turn end of next week at the earliest. 2) People are turning bearish so when enough are bearish the market turns on them.

Moepenmoes

$MSFT and $MA keeping my port green for the last 30 days already. I don't even know why I'm still holding onto my semis bags, feels like it's going to drop quite a bit more before it V's back up a little.

Throwaway37620

What does it mean when a stock falls below all it's MA lines 🤡

PenguinOfB00m

The triple top formed over 2 weeks or so last month, it was the bounce down from the 2200-2300 range. MA50 is broken, the outlook is very very bad. Without a support level it's hard to tell what is going to happen, plus most of the trades this last month were based on headlines rather than hyped. If SNDK makes a clean break under 1500 it's going much lower.

shoebucks_moonpie

Most support/resistance levels and moving averages. For example, I put a lot of money into Marvel when it recently hit the 21 day MA.

music_is_gud

Market breadth is literally expanding. You can see how many constituents are hitting 52 wk highs and how many are moving above 50d and 200d MA. It was in the 30s in may compared to 50s in July. Idk what tf you on about.