Reddit Posts
SafeStake’s Impact on Ethereum: Expanding the Validator Base to Ensure Finalization of Transactions
Ender Protocol V1 Launch - Get Early Access to the Closed Beta and $ENDR Airdrop by Minting the Ender WL NFT!
Ender Protocol V1 Launch - Get Early Access to the Closed Beta and $ENDR Airdrop by Minting the Ender WL NFT!
Ender Protocol V1 Launch - Get Early Access to the Closed Beta and $ENDR Airdrop by Minting the Ender WL NFT!
We're excited to unveil SSV Network on mainnet!
DVT's Multi-Sig For Validators Takes Ethereum Staking To New Heights
Looking forward: What the Solana community will tackle in 2023 and beyond
DogeVerseToken $DVT | Audited | KYCed Dev | Chainlink Support | Fully On-Chain GameFi Project | First Game Live on BSC | Presale On DxSale July 25th, 2022 | Free NFTs to Presale Contributors | Play2Earn – Passive Income
$DVT ''Diversity'' Crypto taking a leap ahead of shiba before they launch?
Mentions
Pectra should lower node req to 32 to 1 eth I think? And you can do similar work with DVT, steth, etc. the staking ecosystem is pretty accessible and varied these days I would say
You can do the last part with 8 ETH using Rocket Pool / Stader / DVT
Sure happy to address any specifics where I deflected, to address your points: \- Skipping over the DAO examples because again thats not protocol governance \- Just on your Lido comment, yes thats how Lido works and it's the largest one, but there are other more decentralized versions like RocketPool where individuals create their own pools and it's like a slightly more decentralized Lido. Then there's even more decentralized versions using whats called secret shared validator SSV or distributed validator tech DVT, and Obol is one example of this and Lido has announced they will be moving to a DVT based architecture so anyone can join and its fully decentralized. This tech is pretty sweet because it ensures that no single operator has full control of the validator, and their job, proposing and attesting, are performed collaboratively by the pooled participants. \- Not disagreeing that slashing and rugging Lido depositors would be very bad but from a chain security and resilience perspective it doesn't bring it down. At worst blocks would have delayed finality but still have liveness where blocks are still being produced and Bitcoin doesn't even have the concept of finality so a 34% malicious control of stake would degrade it Bitcoin block production QoS. A 67% attack would be equal to Bitcoin's 51% attack but again Ethereum is able to recover from this where stake is deleted & validators are kicked where PoW mining rigs can't be deleted. \- Home PoW mining vs home PoS staking have the same level of anonymity from an ISP standpoint. We can get into the PoW vs PoS debate if you want, but I was an early bitcoin miner and mined on the first commercial ASICs as well. I saw my profitability margins drop pretty fast as total network hash grew and my % contribution of hashes fell. Sounds like you might know something about this as well no? \- PoW is inherently a centralizing design as the network grows and you have to essentially start making serious investments in your mining setup to stay competitive. As industrial mining operators continue to grow they reap more benefits of economy of scale and also raise capital to continue to add hash power, which is good for total network economic strength, but bad for decentralization as home miners have to compete by perpetually adding and upgrading hardware.
> This is a costless attack, it can continue indefinitely But it only works on some home stakers, no one is going to be able to DDoS professionally run validators, or even those home stakers using using distributed validators (DVT)... it wouldn't be indefinite, you'd have to be very lucky to be able to attack 2 consecutive epochs!
Ethereum has DVT and lido starting to adopt this too, and still, there's lots of different node providers behind the scenes. But as i said, there's lots of more things into decentralization than nodes. If a single entity is pushing code, it's as good as having suso keys.
This article even gets some of the definitions incorrect and doesn't define them accurately enough **Better definions of these terms** 1. **Rollups** - Rollups are a specific type of Layer 2+ scaling solution where transactions are executed off-chain outside of L1 and posted to L1 where consensus is reached. If the full rollup data (can be compressed) is not posted to L1 (e.g. only the hash is posted), it's not a full rollup, and is usually called a Validium. 1. **Byzantine Fault Tolerance** - Resilience to the Byzantine Generals problem, which is a problem of reaching consensus when actors don't necessarily have to be honest. This article is incorrect that Bitcoin solve BFT. Bitcoin actually works around BFT by using PoW. 1. **Nonce** - A one-time use data. Can be used for so many use cases, e.g. as a counter for transactions, as padding, for providing randomization for encryption. These definitions it got right: 1. **Blobs** - Literally just any chunk of binary data. In crypto, it often refers specifically to temporary EIP-4844 storage on Ethereum used for rollups and other data-availability use cases. 1. **Proto-danksharding** - It's just the name for EIP-4844, which introduces blobs to Ethereum. 1. **DVT** — Distributed validator technology - Not a popular term. It does this by splitting the private key used to secure a validator across many computers. 1. **Dynamic Resharding** - Not a popular term. Similar to horizontal scaling. It's basically when a system automatically adjust/scales the number of shards depending on load.
tldr; The article explains seven confusing crypto terms that are often misunderstood even by those familiar with blockchain technology. These terms include: 1) Blobs, which are large data chunks used in Ethereum and Monero; 2) Rollups, a method for processing transactions on layer-2 protocols; 3) The Byzantine Generals problem, a theoretical issue in decentralized consensus; 4) Proto-danksharding, a transaction type for Ethereum; 5) DVT, a decentralized validator technology; 6) Dynamic resharding, a method for adjusting blockchain shards; and 7) Nonce, a number used in Bitcoin mining. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.
Why do you believe PoW is more decentralized than PoS? Mining allows for economies of scale benefits, meaning that the richer you are the higher your rate of returns. The end result is a situation like Bitcoin where almost no regular people can profitably mine, and Bitmain (through Antpool and other entities) probably accounts for >50% of block templates as well as manufacturing~90% of the mining hardware in the world -[https://np.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1d4wd9b/bitmain_likely_made_their_firmware_slow_on/] In PoS on the other hand, everyone gets almost the same returns. If you have 1 validator or 1,000 validators, you earn at the same rate... and if you don't have enough of the staked asset to run a solo validator you can split one with up to 9 friends via DVT and still earn the same rate, or run a RocketPool validator and earn very slightly more. If you don't have enough for either of these options then you can join a liquid staking pool with any amount of ether and still earn ~90% as much proportionally as the millionaire running 1,000 validators. With Bitcoin's PoS everyone in the above scenario except the millionaire would lose money trying to participate. Much decentralization!
Out of millions, about 15 reported DVT and 22 reported blood clots. That's a super low percentage and do you know the percentage of those things happening without taking any vaccine? Same. And COVID has those risks also at a higher rate than these few out of millions. They only briefly paused using astrazeneka but didn't pull it.
tldr; The article discusses an incident in May 2023 where Ethereum experienced a delay in transaction finalization due to a significant number of validators going offline. This event highlighted the need for a diverse set of validators to ensure the security and decentralization of the Ethereum blockchain. SafeStake is introduced as a solution that employs Distributed Validator Technology (DVT) to create a more resilient validator network by lowering the ETH staking threshold and allowing more participants. SafeStake's approach aims to reduce the risk of transaction finality failure and enhance the overall stability of the Ethereum network. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.
You talked about forking and nodes, which is what I was talking about, not validators which require 32 ETH. You can always run nodes for free. You can validate with Rocketpool with 8 ETH + RPL, or very soon, SSV or other DVT solutions like Diva with 0.1 ETH.
source: https://ethresear.ch/t/sticking-to-8192-signatures-per-slot-post-ssf-how-and-why/17989 > "reduce complexity" by... >"raise the min deposit size to 4096 ETH and make a total cap of 4096 validators (~16.7 million ETH). Small-scale stakers would be expected to join a DVT pool." No thanks, we want solo stakers for decentralization. And that's not reducing complexity at all.
It'll be less using Diva, and other DVT solutions
Naw, DVT technology like Diva, and SSV, which will allow people to stake with minimal amount of ETH, will be like the Stratum v2 for Ethereum. Ethereum will be just fine.
Or how about this. I’m going to launch a new cryptocurrency called DeepValueNetwork where the tokens are called DVT (deep value tokens) and the maximum supply of DeepValueNetwork will be 0.1 DVT. Is my cryptocurrency now more scarce than the Hope Diamond or space shuttles, or Bitcoin, just because it has the fewest number if arbitrary units?
The problem is that for you to become a validator, you need 32 Eth and some organisation offer stacking services like Lido who is liquid stacking provider. They are a DAO (decentralized organisation) that gives you token (stEth) when you stake with them. They let people stake through them. While they do have 30% of the total Eth staked, they are not a single entity, further more, they introduced DVT to improve decentralization :
tldr; SSV.network has launched its mainnet to address concerns about the centralization of Ethereum staking pools. The platform's distributed validator technology (DVT) aims to improve private key security and reduce downtime and slashing penalties for validators. By spreading out key management and signing responsibilities across multiple parties, SSV.network increases security and makes validator sets more robust. This launch comes as centralized exchanges and liquid staking pools hold a significant share of the total staked ETH. SSV.network offers an alternative solution that is both liquid and decentralized. The technology was previously highlighted as an important aspect of Ethereum's scaling roadmap. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.
tldr; The SSV mainnet, developed by ssv.network, aims to decentralize staking for Ethereum and other blockchains. This comes as the staking landscape has faced criticism for being dominated by centralized providers. SSV's Distributed Validator Technology (DVT) Network allows for the sharing of validators among multiple operators, increasing decentralization. The launch will see multiple teams deploying their staking dapps on the network. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.
How are you guys pro-crypto but against innovation in crypto? There is still so much to build. I don't see how funding being low can be good news. Being happy about funding being low because less shitcoins is the same as being unhappy about winning the lottery because you pay more taxes. Just a few public goods projects coming up on Ethereum that NEED funding and whose success can pump your bags: -DVT & potentially the first truly decentralized & permissionless LST from Diva -liquity v2 & censorship resistant stables like GRAI - Uniswap v4 I mentioned Ethereum because it may look like it is the chain with one of the highest variety of Dapp choice. Well, guess what, other chains need even more funding!
You are absolutely correct. I am currently running an SSV testnet node :-) As well as an Obol one. I also co-founded https://www.dvstakers.com you should come check it out! The possibilities are endless with DVT.
I also agree, we need to work towards decentralising Ethereum as much as possible, and DVT is a great way to do this. SSV Network actually got a grant from the Ethereum foundation to work on this. If it's good enough for Vitalik, it's good enough for me. I would recommend following them on Twitter to keep up with them, that's where I found the article as they published it today.
DVT is going to be huge. The SSV team do great work :-) Thanks for sharing.
tldr; Shapella has enabled withdrawals for ETH validators. Withdrawals have finally unlocked what feels like nearly pre-historic ETH. What’s next for validators? Distributed Validator Technology (DVT). DVT provides a way to distribute validators across 4,7,10, or even 13 nodes, exponentially improving their resilience and decentralization of the network. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.*
tldr; Bankless has identified Distributed Validator Technology (DVT) as an innovative protocol that aims to improve the accessibility and ease of staking on the Ethereum network. DVT’s approach involves introducing a “multi-sig for validators,” which splits control over a single private key among a group of validators. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.*
What’s the difference between DVT and what something like Rocketpool does now?
1. The Cancun upgrade will essential lower fees a bit (scheduled for later 2023). 2. The DVT upgrade will make eth pool gatherings for future validators, way easier for the average joe (not eta yet). The 3rd one is a possible solution for EVM attacks, possibly some time in the next 2-3 years.
1) The Cancun hard fork will implement EIP-4844 in the third or fourth quarter of 2023. This will herald in technology called “Proto-Danksharding,” which will turbocharge rollups. 2) Distributed Validator Technology (DVT) is another major milestone on Ethereum’s roadmap. Currently, solo staking is a technical process for validators with 32 ETH, and staking services such as exchanges are centralized. “DVT makes ‘squad staking’ easy for you and your buddies. Pool your capital and relax,” explained Bankless on April 20. Obol Labs is working on a DVT solution that it expects to be deployed before 2024. 3) The third major milestone is proposer-builder separation (PBS). This aims to address the problems caused by MEV attacks (maximal-extractable-value). PBS aims to create a “division of labor between two crucial tasks of block-building: proposing a block, and building it,” reported Bankless. This upgrade will take at least two years.
Gotta get your legs moving my guy. One can get a DVT which can cause a blood clot in your lungs.
Anyone else see DVT and just assume it was a health related coin about Deep Vein Thrombosis? lol
What does everyone think about SSV Network? Curious to know your thoughts as it's just outside the top 100 market caps and working on a system to help decentralize Ethereum more through DVT.
The process of setting up a validator really isn’t *that* difficult… you could also look into a DVT solution whenever that finally hits main net (ssv.network for example) where your validator is split into multiple shards, and the failure of any single node isn’t enough to cause the failure of the whole validator.
tldr; Bankless has updated its Ultimate Guide to Airdrops to include five new protocols. ether.fi is a liquid staking protocol that allows stakers to retain their keys and allows for the creation of a node services marketplace. The Protocol plans to integrate with EigenLayer to provide node services and implement DVT-based key sharing when it is available. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR. Get more of today's trending news [here](https://coinfeeds.substack.com).*
Dead on arrival imo. And I think we will see similar plays on SSV, DVT, eigenlayer tokens. 5 years. White paper hyped up by vitalik. No real product. No real code. Lots of words and fancy looking academic papers.
Hello Cal, there is currently an auction for 303 examples of physical cryptocurrency being held by Stacks Bowers galleries. Link: https://auctions.stacksbowers.com/auctions/3-11DVT6/spring-2023-auction-session-9-cryptocurrency-lots-8001-8303?limit=36
That’s why you have options like Rocket Pool, Stakewise v3, Stader, DVT etc.
Afaik, and not a lawyer, but there is no precedent, nor law that stops block producers from not including OFAC transactions - the current state of things with relayers is that they are over-complying. Because if that was the case, you'd hear about Bitcoin miners in the US being arrested for including OFAC transactions in their blocks, but that isn't the case. Regarding an extreme situation like you mentioned, that may be a slim possibility and you do have a point (also why I said "mainly" earlier, regarding running the same validators on 2 devices). This is also why the community was proactive about client diversity, because if a % of node client runs into a critical snag and those validators get dropped from the network, they risk huge leaking. Same goes for people running various clients on VPS services and they go down. Ethereum is all about incentivizing decentralization in that respect, because the more decentralization there is, the less risk of huge leaking for all validators involved. It'll only get better though, especially with DVT, which will allow others to help validate on different machines, which means less risk and more uptime for validators. I don't think I can link here so search up "Distributed Validator Technology\_Aditya Asgaonkar" on youtube if you're interested
You are rewarded in ETH. The rETH token essentially tracks beaconchain rewards, which are denominated in ETH. You can redeem your ETH at any moment, directly through the protocol or on a secondary market. Bridges aren't relevant in this instance. And it's possibly not going to remain the best solution forever. But it's the best right now, and it's an evolving protocol - it will change in lockstep with the latest developments. LEB8 minipools is a good example, as is DVT.
They were only $3200 at the low of the pandemic? Not to mention, Rocket Pool allows 16 ETH mini pools, soon 8 ETH mini pools, and DVT technology will allow people to pool funds together to run a validator.
You don't need any ETH to run an Ethereum node You can use services such as Rocket Pool to run a validator node, which lower the capital requirement. Currently 16 ETH, but will be 8 ETH come the time withdrawals are enabled. The barrier to entry is only going to reduce in the future with DVT.
To become a validator, you need 32 Eth and some organisation offer stacking services like Lido who is liquid stacking provider. They are a DAO (decentralized organisation) that gives you token (stEth) when you stake with them. They let people stake through them. While they do have 30% of the total Eth staked, they are not a single entity, further more, they introduced DVT to improve decentralization : *One of Lido’s proposed steps toward decentralization involves adopting “Distributed Validator Technology” (DVT) to group validators into independent committees that propose and attest to blocks together. According to Lido, this will “greatly reduce the risk of an individual validator underperforming or misbehaving.”* While it's not perfect, the ethereum developers are looking at solutions and I trust them to find a suitable longterm solution. In the meanwhile, just know that most of these 4 entities are composed of multiple validators
No doubt - Stakewise v3 and DVT coming soon. And FWIW, Rocket Pool community has signalled to self limit.
Rocket Pool Stakewise DVT You can participate with less than 32 ETH!
Yes and no... In a pure sense they are - individuals can pool funds together and run validators just using their ETH. However, there is nothing stopping a protocol pooling funds and doing the same. You have an additional layer of risk, but protocols like Rocket Pool can leverage DVT and become even more capital efficient. I would start here - https://ssv.network/
>Forced exits would be a useful feature for all LSD protocols to increase decentralization and safety. As such, it is being worked on collaboratively. Forced exits would help prevent bad actors and increase the value retained when actors do go rogue. As a result, the inclusion of forced exits may allow Rocket Pool to drop the bond requirement all the way to 2 ETH. This is a massive change. For perspective, if every current node operator switched to 2ETH pools, that would give Rocket Pool the capacity to onboard 15x as much rETH, or 2.4 million rETH. Currently, 16 node ETH creates 16 rETH, but with forced exits, 16 node ETH will accommodate 240 rETH. Without considering any increase in node operators, this upgrade alone will allow Rocket Pool to compete on the biggest stages. > >For Rocket Pool, DVT represents exciting technology that may enable an even lower bond and increase the overall effectiveness of stakers. Home stakers in aggregate tend to have slightly lower average uptime than institutional stakers, often due to unstable internet or power, but DVT would even the playing field greatly. Rocket Pool will have LEB8's this quarter, but in the longer term will able to reduce that to LEB4 with forced exits (at the Ethereum protocol level). Distributed Validator Technology (DVT) will enable validator keys to be split and so you can have an even lower bond.
DVT lets you run a validator with other people collaboratively, so in theory you can pitch in whatever amount of ETH you want; it's pretty new so it hasn't caught on just yet.
$SOL "@solanamobile: First DVT-1 units shipped today as well! You know you have a dev kit when it comes from a San FAR away place 😳"
First off, you don’t need 32 ETH to run a validator. You can do it with 16 ETH with Rocket Pool, and from February this will decrease to 8 ETH. Stakewise v3 is also coming in the New Year and there are many other SSV and DVT options that will reduce the minimum stake. Secondly, Lido may be a lot of things, but it doesn’t hold your keys. You always have custody of your assets and can unstake at any time (it’s a *liquid* staking derivative). Third, withdrawals. This is going to result in a big shift in staking distribution. The distribution you see today is not the one you will see in a few months. Hopefully everyone who is staking on a CEX is planning to withdraw and use a decentralised alternative.
>I did. You did not. We will come back to in but in a different way. I will bring it up again in this conversation. Also, I am not trying to make it seem like I am patronizing you or being rude. You are good conversation. >Yes exactly - influence is influence - it's nothing to do with how many coins you hold. You can have influence for qualitative factors and that's nothing to do with token distribution. Influence does have to do with how many coins you hold. If you hold coins, you hold Influence, at least, the more you have. The more you have, the more power you can hold if you go for it. Being a whale is power. >16 ETH to be a Rocket Pool node operator, reducing to 8 ETH in December. 0Any amount for LSD's and DVT when it is implemented. What will 8 ETH be worth when ETH is 10k? 80k? Will it not increase the barrier further and further? >You are confusing banks with other entities. Banks have strict capital requirements. VC's are the current problem. No. They're all the current problem. Banks such as Bank of America have designs on crypto, banks have openly discussed stablecoins and the future of crypto and to think that banks would not try to slide in and respect the red tape is fallacy. They don't respect us at all. >There are bonafide ponzi's within crypto, but that does not mean that crypto as a whole is. A large part of the market is speculation, but again to simply tarnish every crypto with the same brush is not appropriate. I love crypto, but Terra has shown how quick someone can rise to the top and then crash. If Terra can do it, any of the others can. What's more, with all the accusations and pettiness between many founders ( Charles Hoskinson, Vitalik Buterin, David Schwartz, Do Kwon ) they cannot be truly trusted. They are all fair to be subjected to criticism. >I agree that 90% of projects will disappear - there's only a handful that drive real value. The blockchains themselves cannot access the TVL and so not really sure what you mean here. I mean, they have the TVL themselves. Take Terra, in which I cannot recall it's peak TVL. It held though, in which all that TVL was lost. Of course, this is investment and speculation, this is the market itself in which risk vs reward. Still though, with the TVL onchain, anything is possible and we can label Terra an isolated incident if you wish, but the money was onchain. Do Kwon didn't need to do anything with the money he couldn't access in TVL, he made the money other ways. If they cannot take our money in one way, a shark will find another way to take it from us. I love crypto and let me say that I value it extremely as well.
>You did not acquire the point here. I did. > Influence is influence, the power to say or do something. Being Vitalik Buterin is influence. His words make moves alone, but he is an example. That's not transparent at all, if we don't know what influence the top holders have, nor is that decentralized. Yes exactly - influence is influence - it's nothing to do with how many coins you hold. You can have influence for qualitative factors and that's nothing to do with token distribution. ​ >So what's the barrier to entry now? 16 ETH to be a Rocket Pool node operator, reducing to 8 ETH in December. 0Any amount for LSD's and DVT when it is implemented. >They're already at the gates and do you believe that regulation is stopping them from already attempting to manipulate the market? When they are already looking at projects of their own, they have already poured in. Regulation is just lifting off the red tape. You are confusing banks with other entities. Banks have strict capital requirements. VC's are the current problem. ​ >Wym? I love crypto but it is infested and it's all about getting rich now. Terra was a domino that fell so who is next? There are some good tech but the rest are in it for the money. There are bonafide ponzi's within crypto, but that does not mean that crypto as a whole is. A large part of the market is speculation, but again to simply tarnish every crypto with the same brush is not appropriate. ​ >Above 90% of crypto projects. Not in their direct disposal, but in their blockchains. When the TVL of chains are in the billions, that's a lot of money that they are overseeing. I agree that 90% of projects will disappear - there's only a handful that drive real value. The blockchains themselves cannot access the TVL and so not really sure what you mean here.
Rocket Pool Staking pools DVT There are plenty of ways to to reduce the barrier to entry for staking
L2, eth staking, and DVT, modular blockchains rather than monolithic
I needed to do cardio exercise to stay healthy. I could barely do anything in a mask. I'd rather have Covid than diabetes. You will see people dying earlier worldwide over the next few years from easily-preventable modern epidemics such as heart issues, strokes exacerbated by sleep apnea, lung issues (from lack of cardio exercise, and from inhaling mask fibres), cholesterol, high blood pressure, obesity, blood clots and DVT. And all kinds of diabetes-related issues of course. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerobic_exercise#Health_benefits https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerobic_conditioning
Yeah, a lot of the "you can only run Ethereum nodes on AWS!!!111!" is dis/misinformation. Solana on the other hand.. needs way beefier specs. If you want to stake right now, you could either do it through a service like Lido, or a decentralized pool like Rocket Pool by either running your own mini pool with 16 ETH, or just buying rETH directly as it accrues the staking rewards and eventually tips/MEV within the token. In few months to a year, there will be solutions like SSV/DVT which will allow users to trustlessly pool funds adding up to 32 ETH to directly run validators, but that will still take a bit more time.
Rocket Pool. Also, eventually SSV/DVT tech.
Thank you so much! It turns out Mom's condition is serious. I'm working on having her transferred to a different hospital. Long story short...Mom is 78 and has a significant clot in her leg and a bilateral pulmonary embolism related to hip replacement surgery. I had surgery back in 2014 and the same thing happened to me...so I'm already well versed in this. I had to insist on Mom getting a CT of her lungs (they only ordered a doppler of her leg initially), and they took almost five hours after the initial DVT diagnosis to put her on therapeutic treatment. I've put the wheels in motion to get her transferred to a different hospital and hopefully, if she's stable enough, will have her at that hospital sometime tomorrow. Dad said he and Mom can't afford to pay for the ambulance to transfer Mom to another hospital...and I told Dad not to worry...that I'd cover it. I don't have much Crypto...but I have more than enough to cover whatever their co-pay on the ambulance is. I'm grateful for investing during the dip...because my XRP is almost double what it was when I first bought it. P.S. I hope my dreams come true too...but right now, I'll be happy for Mom to make it through this.
I was in the hospital, in February, with Double Pulmonary Embolism and DVT’s in both legs. I had a night time nurse that just wanted to talk about Cryptocurrency every night. He is the reason I bought into ADA on the Cardano network and Dogecoin. Dogecoin went very well. I wish I’d stayed in if, but I didn’t. But ADA is the bomb. It’ll take off. I’m guessing it’s going to be $25 this year and $50 in 2022. It will replace most of banking. Much faster than ETH on Ethereum network. Tell everyone you know to look at it. I’m not a financial advisor. Do what you want. But do your homework on what you buy. I did. This is the way!
I did the same thing. In February I had DVT’s in both legs and PE’s in both lungs. They were so bad I had a 7% chance of survival. A nurse in the hospital was talking about Cryptocurrency. We talked about it every night. I thought what the hell do I have to lose. Then I bought into Dogecoin at 0.049. I just sold a week ago at 0.488 and then put it into ADA, LTC, ETH and ETC. oh my god. Life changing. Then yesterday, my Hemotologist gave me good news that the meds are working.. I wouldn’t have done this if I hadn’t been in the hospital. Now I am close to retiring early. Thanks to the nurse. Thanks to Crypto.
Just don’t be one of those Traveler beggars that Annoy the shit out of the the locals. 
I've got $DVT bags doing see-saw. Up 1 cent today and then below a cent some days later. Another one is $BET. My bag is kinda stable but I'm not so worried here since I already stake $BET for monthly dividends in BTC & ETH every month [Earnbet](http://htttps://luck.earnbet.io). My last frustrating bag is $NIM & $WEBD. They run on sort of the same MO but kinda look stagnant. I've got loads in these bags and this is where I plan to get my Lambo from.
I haven't seen my DVT & WEBD pump for weeks. I've just decided to concentrate on staking $BET tokens for monthly dividends in BTC & ETH on [Earnbet](https://luck.earnbet.io). That way, I don't bother about the lack of pumps for a while.
Anyone holding $DVT bags here too? Apart from my $BET bags stacked up via my my degen wagers on [Earnbet](https://luck.earnbet.io) (I did this a lot with the $1,200 stimulus plus I don't regret it as I got my $BET bag staked for monthly dividends in BTC long term in there as well), my bag in $DVT is my most significant - about 200k units. Got some nice pumps lately and its now valued at $0.01+. I got in sometime in February last year when it was $0.0004. I guess I haven't done bad for myself. It's the race to a dollar for me and I think the next pump might do wonders.