COM

Interesting-Hold-963

Ridiculously rich is all relative. to me it would be $20 million and over. I just surpassed $1 million this year and don't fell rich at all. Don't get me wrong, It's nice but I should have been here years ago before the DOT COM crash. I refused to take profits and almost lost it all, and have been clawing my way back ever since. I do have zero debt, so that is huge to me.

Interesting-Hold-963

I lost a ton on paper but knew it was coming. I don't sweat things anymore even being age 61 and still aggressively invest in higher risk stocks. Compare this to the DOT COM crash, this is a little blip. When the dot com crash happened, it just keep going down every day for nearly 2 years....2 YEARS! with very few rallies. It's really not that big of deal considering how much tech stocks have soared over last few years. NEVER EVER PANIC!

Aromatic_King_4100

Buy TRULIEVE TCNNF [TRUL.COM](http://TRUL.COM) FIRST USA CANNABIS COMPANY TO UPLIST TO NYSE (JUNE 10). HUGE

tabspdx

> I worked in tech during the .com. Me too, which is why I'd never call google a .COM. This is the one I worked for: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1095388/000089161899005490/0000891618-99-005490.txt

tabspdx

In .COM parlance, I'm pretty sure that it is still 1996~8.

KeyInstruction641

*Tom "Fat Cuck" Lee CEO of Bag* [*Holder.COM*](http://Holder.COM) *announced today that his 3 million dollar price target on $CORN by EOY 2027 might be a smidge too high.* *BMNR ATH 161 today's close $19*

Dude_HaHa

As soon as I buy MRVL calls, the market will tank, just like the .COM bubble.

BAD_AL_1

I was just talking to a guy today that lost $4M in the .COM bubble. Sucks to lose $100k , but now you know what not to do. If you really have no cash left, perhaps practice in Schwab's paper accounts. 2 strategies I've found that I really like are: 1. Finding breakouts on Finvis (take position and set stops; nice FinViz video: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ml0oItXZjIY](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ml0oItXZjIY) ) 2. selling Puts on levered ETFs that are in an uptrend, but having a down day (also setting up limit orders to buy back at 50% max profit). Learned from watching this guy: [https://www.youtube.com/@MarketMoves](https://www.youtube.com/@MarketMoves)

AllstarGER

Oh man, this feels so much like DOT COM bubble

Ok-Thought-9960

Nah it just ruined my favorite audio distributor (RIP DROP.COM) I hope that company falls apart and gets stuck with all the overpriced keyboards 

tacomeat99

You need to get out of those XOM calls. I doubt COM gets close that price again. Its headed back to the normal 120-130 range as long as Iran doesn't shake things up again.

Mapeague

I have one of those TVs! We got it in 2005 when my dad married my now stepmom. Those images are crisp, especially **Xham$ter.com!** That fist day was insane... she got stuck under the couch! She was struggling and asking for help, so I **COME TO XHAM$TER.COM TO FIND OUT!**

No_Faithlessness7831

AI definitely is real, especially for coding, legal work, and doing things like summarizing any type of documents or text. And there's probably a bunch of other areas that it has some application. The amount of CapEx that's being spent, I think, is 700 billion plus this year. When you look at the actual revenue coming out of these AI companies, there's a huge gap right now. This definitely has shades of 1999 just look at WDC and MU stock charts. [Micron Market Capitalization](https://pro.stockalarm.io/charts?series=MU%3Afirebase-price%3AmarketCap%3Adaily&tf=5Y&type=line&indexed=0&singleAxis=1&highLow=0&labels=0&stacked=1&axisRight=0&sd=2021-05-26&ed=2026-05-27) Increased from $80B in 2025 to over $1 Trillion. WDC, MU, CSCO, INTC all looked just like this before the .COM crash and Intel warning on revenue was the catalyst that sent the market crashing back then.

regardus_maximus

HEY RETARD, LAST I CHECKED IN 2022 WHEN WE HAD MASSIVE INFLATION BTC WENT DOWN A FUCKTON. ALSO CHECK THE [INVESTING.COM](http://INVESTING.COM) FED RATE MONITOR TOOL, IT WILL TELL YOU INTEREST RATES ARE 98 PERCENT STAYING WHERE THEY ARE. WHEN BANK OF JAPAN RAISES INTEREST RATES NEXT MONTH YOU WILL BE GAPED.

learner_1748

Did you ever ask yourself a question when computer replaced the paper work and when DOT COM replaced in person shopping or banking experience.. AI is next wave in the path, accept it and see how you can use it wisely to survive the hurricane

PNWPlayZ

it's a slow churn but our economy is fucked. At some point the market will reflect it. I don't think it'll be a .COM bubble style crash but we may give back some of this 20-30% run up that we're seeing.

bartturner

I agree 100% that the build out will take a lot longer with AI and therefore will take longer to expose the weak players. But there is ZERO/NADA/NO bubble with companies like Google. They told you so last week when they reported. They have over $230 billion of unrecognized revenue. There was NEVER anything like that with the .COM bust. I did a bit of research and no company has ever added that much revenue that quick ever before.

Rav_3d

This is not pure exuberance and euphoria. There are plenty of people like you who are skeptical. Michael Burry is saying there are similarities to the dot-com bubble. There are plenty of articles about how the market is ignoring the risk of energy prices and shortages. There are many saying that the Fed is not cutting rates anymore and may even hike later this year. In 2000 I do not recall any bubble talk. The stock market was in a new paradigm. CISCO PE over 100? No problem, this time is different. The Internet changed everything. People were piling into stocks like [PETS.COM](http://PETS.COM) that had no business whatsoever. Valuations in infrastructure companies like JDS Uniphase were off the charts. This is not like today, where the hottest stocks in the market SNDK and MU still trade at PEs well below their expected growth rate, and NVDA trades at a forward PE around 25. Yes, we are in a period of *short-term* euphoria as so many missed the historic April rally and the FOMO is extreme. The market is overdue for a pullback or at least a rest. But I'm willing to bet we are going to be a lot higher next year at this time, more than anyone thinks possible.

bartturner

It really comes down to the company. Take Google. They shared last week they have over $230 billion of unrecognized revenue. There has never been a company that added that much revenue that quick. Never in history. But this is also only one division at Google. Their cloud division. They will be adding to all their other stuff and likely to surpass $700 billion in revenue in just 2 years! I am old. Did well with the .COM era. The house I am typing this from today was purchased by selling half my CSCO in early 2000. Selling at the time was luck and not brains. But we never had anything like what Google is doing today in the .COM era.

bartturner

It is not going to end for a pretty long time. This is a lot different than the dark fiber in .COM boom/bust. Here there will not be enough capacity maybe not until 2024. By that time companies like Google are just going to be massive. Heck Google is about to add more revenue in the next 2 years than any company has ever added in history in that short of a period of time. Google is going to add over $230 billion just with their cloud division in the next 24 months!

Sufficient_Nose629

# Top Holdings Subject to change. # Fund Top Holdings as of May 04 2026 |**Name**|**Shares Held**|**Weight**| |:-|:-|:-| |NVIDIA CORP|289,213,915|7.82%| |APPLE INC|174,731,313|6.59%| |MICROSOFT CORP|88,377,097|4.98%| |[AMAZON.COM](http://AMAZON.COM) INC|116,263,007|4.31%| |ALPHABET INC CL A|69,289,784|3.62%| |BROADCOM INC|56,427,238|3.20%| |ALPHABET INC CL C|55,670,678|2.88%| |META PLATFORMS INC CLASS A|26,036,007|2.16%| |TESLA INC|33,479,922|1.79%| |BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CL B|21,829,549|1.39%|

zxc123zxc123

>long-term contracts and obligations already signed How sure are we about this again? Like "Bear Sterns and Lehman are good", "Trump will keep his promises", or "All these .COM companies promised they'll use our hardware!"?

playstationjeans

BE BLOOM ENERGY CORP INTC INTEL CORP COM LITE LUMENTUM HLDG VIAV VIAVI SOLUTIONS MRVL MARVELL TECHN GOOG ALPHABET INC C PWR QUANTA SERVICE AVGO BROADCOM INC NBIS NEBIUS GROUP N CIEN CIENA CORP COHR COHERENT CORP NVT NVENT ELECTRIC ANET ARISTA NETWORK MU MICRON CAT CATERPILLAR POWL POWELL INDUSTRIES LFUS LITTLEFUSE LWLG LIGHTWAVE LOGI (Gambling) AMKR AMKOR TECHNO CAT CATERPILLAR INC VRT VERTIV HOLDING DLR DIGITAL REALTY T KRKNF KRAKEN ROBOTIC LRCX LAM RESEARCH C GLW CORNING INC CCJ CAMECO CORP C GEV GE VERNOVA INC TER TERADYNE INC CL

Thisplacesucks011

Mr. Burry called it. He loaded up on ADBE, and SAAS, and puts on the chips makers. ##AI bubble going to make the .COM bubble look like the bubble for ants…

bartturner

This is exactly what I expected with OpenAI. To me they just seem so much like Netscape in the .COM era.

jigglyflo5

FLWS is a value trap (and kinda trash) — fundamentals + technicals breakdown Alright, let’s talk about 1-800-FLOWERS.COM ($FLWS). On the surface it looks “cheap.” In reality…it’s cheap for a reason. 🧾 Fundamentals: This business is deteriorating 1. Revenue is shrinking * FY2025 revenue: ~$1.69B → down ~8% YoY * Q2 2026 revenue: -9.5% YoY decline This isn’t a “growth company”—it’s a shrinking one. ⸻ 2. Profitability is a mess * FY2025 net loss: ~-$200M * Net margin around -13% * ROA: -25.9% (destroying capital) They literally lose money selling flowers on the internet. ⸻ 3. Earnings quality is weak * Earnings quality ratio: 0.13x (very low) Translation: 👉 Profits (when they exist) are accounting-driven, not cash-driven ⸻ 4. Margins are declining * Gross margin dropping (promo pressure + weak demand) * Operating margin down YoY This is a race to the bottom pricing business ⸻ 5. Demand is structurally weak * “Everyday gifting” = majority of revenue → “anemic” demand * Sales have been declining every quarter for ~2 years People buy flowers on holidays…not in a recession-ish consumer environment. ⸻ 6. Balance sheet isn’t great * Cash runway ~21 months at current burn * Negative earnings, low returns, mediocre financial health (Piotroski score ~4) Not bankrupt tomorrow—but not strong either. ⸻ 📉 Technicals: This chart is cooked 1. Long-term downtrend * Stock went from ~$9 (2024 avg) → ~$5 (2025) → ~$4 now * Down 40%+ in 2025 alone That’s not a dip. That’s a trend. ⸻ 2. No momentum, no buyers * Keeps making lower highs + lower lows * Any rally = sold immediately Classic dead money / distribution pattern ⸻ 3. Penny-stock behavior * Trading around ~$3–$4 range recently * Market cap ~200–300M → tiny, illiquid, easily manipulated This is not where institutions park capital. ⸻ 🧠 The core problem FLWS is stuck in a brutal spot: * ❌ Discretionary spending (first thing consumers cut) * ❌ Low moat (anyone can sell flowers/gifts online) * ❌ Amazon / local florists / Etsy competition * ❌ Seasonal revenue spikes → inconsistent earnings * ❌ Promotions killing margins So you get: 👉 declining revenue + weak demand + shrinking margins + no pricing power ⸻ 💀 Why it looks “cheap” (but isn’t) Bulls say: * “Low P/S” * “Turnaround story” * “Cost cutting” Reality: * Low multiples = market pricing in decline * Cost cutting ≠ growth * You can’t cut your way to a good business ⸻ 🔥 Bottom line FLWS is: * A shrinking, unprofitable business * In a weak demand category * With no technical support on the chart 👉 This isn’t a hidden gem 👉 It’s a value trap with a flower logo

charliesk9unit

Or lapping DOTCOM to a company's name pre-2000. FART, INC - worthless [FART.COM](http://FART.COM) \- $1 gazzillion

wentzco

Yeah I've been keeping track of TOKE the last 12 days to see what was being sold daily. There were a number of days they didn't sell any Green Thumb or Glass House but started the last 4 days. Vireo Growth and Grown Rogue have been the most affected in share price by TOKE selling. From 12 trading days ago 2.12% 22587M106 TRS 041526 CRESCO LABS INC-SUBORDINATE SWAP 22587M106 TRS 041526 348,654 $336,102.46 6.30% 377130406 TRS 041526 GLASS HOUSE BRANDS INC SWAP 377130406 TRS 041526 117,520 $997,744.80 8.91% 39342L108 TRS 041526 GREEN THUMB INDUSTRIES INC SWAP 39342L108 TRS 041526 222,442 $1,412,506.70 4.39% 39986R304 TRS 041526 GROWN ROGUE INTL INC COM SWAP 39986R304 TRS 041526 2,242,586 $695,201.66 2.30% 88105E108 TRS 041526 TERRASCEND CORP SWAP 88105E108 TRS 041526 544,261 $364,654.87 4.15% 89788C104 TRS 041526 TRULIEVE CANNABIS CORP SWAP 89788C104 TRS 041526 107,851 $656,812.59 2.20% 92767B105 TRS 041526 Vireo Growth 92767B105 TRS 041526 831,336 $349,161.12 Holdings at start of trading today 1.43% 22587M106 TRS 041526 CRESCO LABS INC-SUBORDINATE SWAP 22587M106 TRS 041526 234,483 $222,735.40 4.93% 377130406 TRS 041526 GLASS HOUSE BRANDS INC SWAP 377130406 TRS 041526 93,646 $770,612.93 6.41% 39342L108 TRS 041526 GREEN THUMB INDUSTRIES INC SWAP 39342L108 TRS 041526 147,959 $1,001,682.43 1.62% 39986R304 TRS 041526 GROWN ROGUE INTL INC COM SWAP 39986R304 TRS 041526 924,127 $252,286.67 1.76% 88105E108 TRS 041526 TERRASCEND CORP SWAP 88105E108 TRS 041526 430,042 $275,226.88 1.63% 89788C104 TRS 041526 TRULIEVE CANNABIS CORP SWAP 89788C104 TRS 041526 39,851 $255,046.40 0.95% 92767B105 TRS 041526 Vireo Growth 92767B105 TRS 041526 367,309 $148,833.61

andersonsilva1212

I would not worry about that, like the .COM boubble, a lot of companies will survive!

CuriesGhost

2040? Nuclear WW3 well before that...early 2030s... enjoy the ride down. No more NYC, and mushroom clouds in Florida - Where CENT COM, etc..is HQ (Ask AI). Mar Lago destroyed or irradiated. It's all good...

RChrisCoble

The .COM collapse took 3 years to hit bottom, and another 8 to recover to the prior S&P high. Never catch falling knife.

deadzead7

The streaming wars are just getting more expensive for us. For a stable 4K 'all-in-one' that has all the WBD, Netflix, and Paramount content in one place without the price hikes, check out ALWAYSTIVI .COM.

visionarywatts

Nice work! Can you provide an example of 1 move where you opened and closed? For example here's something I did this week: * SOLD OPENING CALL (CRWV) COREWEAVE INC COM CL MAR 20 26 $120 // Price: $4.10 // Feb-24-2026 * BOUGHT CLOSING CALL (CRWV) COREWEAVE INC COM CL MAR 20 26 $120 // Price: 0.56 // Feb-27-2026 I would work my way backwards to see what you did on a chart

blorg

There is SPXT (ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF) but I don't think this is a good idea. Besides anything else, these are the top 5 holdings: 5.15% AMZN AMAZON.COM INC 4.62% GOOGL ALPHABET INC-CL A 3.69% GOOG ALPHABET INC-CL C 3.60% META META PLATFORMS INC-CLASS A 2.92% TSLA TESLA INC Technically, none of these are "information technology", Amazon (retail) and Tesla (cars) are "Consumer Discretionary" while Alphabet and Meta (media and advertising) are "Communication Services". There is also XMAG (Defiance Large Cap Ex-Magnificent Seven ETF) which specifically excludes the "Mag 7", that would kick all of the above (plus Apple, Microsoft and NVidia). Even that, Broadcom and Micron are in the top 10 holdings. I don't fundamentally think it's a good idea to try these sort of anti-sector bets though, people have been concerned about this for 10 years and if you managed to exclude tech you would have really ruined your returns. If you are concerned about it, better to switch to something like VT which would almost halve your exposure and diversify you out to loads of other sectors (financials, industrials, healthcare/pharmaceuticals, consumer goods, etc) that are larger, relatively, outside the US.

Rav_3d

That's simply not true. The market has held up despite weakness in AI stocks. Some have corrected 50%. Software stocks are in the toilet, including the Mag 7. Only GOOG and AAPL are holding up, barely. NVDA has gone nowhere in 7 months. There has been rotation out of the AI trade into other areas, as evidenced by RSP (equal weight S&P 500) holding up better than the SPX. The "serious concern" is all just noise. People think they're smarter than the CEO's of Google, Microsoft, Meta, Nvidia. They are building the infrastructure for the future. Profitability will become a concern, just like with the Internet. When the buildout was finished, suddenly there were a hundred [PETS.COM](http://PETS.COM) that had no business. We're not even close to that. We're still in the early innings of the buildout phase, and there will be tons of profits made by the companies that supply the materials. People like to talk themselves out of investing because of bubbles and circular financing and the fact that ChatGPT says dumb things sometimes and that means AI is crap. They have no idea what is coming. This is an industrial revolution and it's just getting started.

AmericanScream

It's the 2026 version of PETS.COM.

Remarkable_Lie184

**ELEZATV**.COM hasn’t given me the usual IPTV headaches.

Useful-Journalist-33

Anyone got thoughts on how low MAPS will go? Continues to trend down long term. MAPS WM TECHNOLOGY INC COM price $0.69 Price/Earnings 9.46x Return on equity 18.24% Gross margin 95.02% Operating margin 6.21% [https://www.cnbc.com/quotes/MAPS](https://www.cnbc.com/quotes/MAPS)

Prestigious_Ear_3737

[CNBC.COM](http://CNBC.COM) Shows everything...Asia, EU, metals, oil etc

MarionberryKey7432

THEY DID THE SAME TO ME CONTACT ME AT BLACKBASSJR@ [GMAIL.COM](http://GMAIL.COM) OVER A YEAR AND THEY CHANGED MY PASSWORD AND LOCKED ME OUT OVER 1500 KEEP GIVING ME BS LETS GET THEM

TAOKEN55

There is also great information on their website [RECONAFRICA.COM](http://RECONAFRICA.COM) \----ALSO DISCORD ALSO STOCKTWITS....I have a pile of shares, the flow test set for Q2 and appraisal well Q3 along with Botswana and Gabon results, this stock indeed could go 100x IMO

LuckyFly4

I agree the premium sounded high, but my strategy is put in an order at the bid price of the selling strike minus the ask price of the buying strike. Then, I reduce my order by $0.01 until it fills. Unfortunately, due to the large variance between bid and ask on both strikes it took while to get this order filled for a good premium. Every time, I'd try to get 10 contracts filled, only one 1 would get filled. Then, I'd increase the credit price by a penny, submit it, and then decrease the offer price by a penny and one contract would get filled. Fidelity has some quirky order filling algorithm. Side topic but often I'll get a better fill price than my actual offer. Here's the exact fill details: Date Jan-02-2026 Symbol -MSTR260116P75 Symbol description PUT (MSTR) MICROSTRATEGY COM JAN 16 26 $75 (100 SHS) Type Margin Contracts +1.000 Price $0.04 Fees $0.02 Amount -$4.02 Settlement date Jan-05-2026 Date Jan-02-2026 Symbol -MSTR260116P76 Symbol description PUT (MSTR) MICROSTRATEGY COM JAN 16 26 $76 (100 SHS) Type Margin Contracts -1.000 Price $0.11 Fees $0.02 Amount $10.98 Settlement date Jan-05-2026 Now if I could only scale this to 100 contracts, $10,000 would be reserved for options strategies, but premium would be \~$700 if 14 days.

StockProfitGirl

First of all, 2000 and 2008 are totally different. 2000 was anything that had a .COM to its name people would throw money at thinking they’re going to be rich. The PE’s were over 100 in a lot of cases. It was the Wild West of investing. Almost all of these .COM businesses had ZERO in revenue. They were pipe dreams. 2008 was caused by greedy banks! Heavily leveraged and borrowing money to people that shouldn’t have been given a home loan. Today, the only thing which I see a correlation to 2008 is people that are margined out to their eyeballs. They’re using 3X leveraged funds to make big money. People are using YieldMax funds like a slot machine. If anything, a normal 10% correction will become a 20-30% correction because of margin calls. Trades will unwind quickly. If 2000, 2008, and the possibility of 2026 have in common is GREED. It’s no longer making your 10-15% yearly. It’s about making that 50% plus. If there is a AI bubble bust, it’s going to be the simple reason of mainstream media. The Mecca of Drama…

AVI_Voice

I’m not sure which new stocks I plan on investing in in ‘26, but I sure hope my IREN, COM, DVLT, and DFLI share prices rise back up next year.

Familiar_Squirrel413

[FIRSTRADE.COM](http://FIRSTRADE.COM)

MaleficentCash3310

Its sad but not tragic.. and its not yet the end of the world. Believe me I am in your shoes a year ago. Now i am slowly fighting back and recovering. I want to offer you a RED and a BLUE. If you decide to take the RED pill visit my website [www.reneyagahon.com](http://www.reneyagahon.com) sign up and see where the rabbit hole goes. But if you think you're only a guy with no GUTS and PURPOSE to fight back then take the BLUE pill and wake up the next day on the same miserable situation. Whether you are crazy or not, your life is still in your hands and nobody else. Believe me, YOU WILL THANK ME IN THE YEARS TO COME! See you in the rabbit hole! [WWW.RENEYAGAHON.COM](http://WWW.RENEYAGAHON.COM)

Turbulent-Remove-389

🔥 *FLWS* — 2025-12-17 💵 Price: $4.56 | Δ -1.5118814840325554% | 📊 Vol: 1,728,442 (src: History) 📈 ADX 45.7 | MACD hist 0.125 | RSI 66.2 | Vol× 1.34 🧲 Short: 46.0% | Call/Put OI: 5.1x 💥 Breakout Probability: *90.1%* | ⚡ Early Reversal | Trend: *Neutral* 📰 *Top Headlines:* • 1-800 Flowers (FLWS) Soars 32.8% on Exec Appointment for AI Adoption Efforts • 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (FLWS) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript • 1-800 FLOWERS.COM Q1 2026 Earnings Preview (NASDAQ:FLWS) 🧭 *Trading Guidance (Simple Instructions)* *Recommended Action:* High-conviction: shares + calls (for experienced options traders). *Confidence:* High Buy zone (shares): $4.47–$4.65 Take-profit zone: $5.70–$6.16 (+25–35%) Suggested stop: below ~$4.20. *Why this rating?* • Trend strength is solid (ADX ≥ 25). • Momentum has turned bullish (MACD histogram > 0). • RSI is in a healthy range (not extremely overbought/oversold). • Call interest is significantly above puts (bullish options flow).

peatedscaked54

I was a victim of this same situation a few months ago, but a professional expert stepped in SECRETBESTSPY(AT)GMAIL COM successfully helped me recover my funds. The recovery was done discreetly and efficiently, without leaving any form of trace at all.

WorkSucks135

PDBC, COM, GSG are all pretty flat for the last year?

ChefBoyRD-92

I was actually looking at WMT chart earlier. During the DOT-COM bubble it was right at $58 on June 30, two months later on August 31st it was below $16. The Ai pop will be brutal.

johnlovesbigwomen

YOU TALK LIKE A NOVICE WHO JUST GOT LUCKY. ADDING TO A LOSING POSITION IS RETARDED. THE WHOLE GAME IS CUT YOUR LOSSES SHORT AND LET YOUR PROFITS RUN. YOUR BS STRATEGY WAS NOT BASED ON PRICE ACTION AND VOLUME. WHICH ARE BY FAR THE TWO MOST IMPORTANT COMPONENTS OF ANY SUCCESSFUL DAY TRADING, SWING OR POSITION TRADING SYSTEM. YOUR BOGUS STRATEGY WAS FOR POSITION TRADING. POSITION TRADING IS NOT REALLY RECOMMENDED WHEN THE S & P 500 IS TRADING AT FORWARD EARNINGS OF 23.58, WHICH IS THE HIGHEST IT HAS BEEN IN 25 YEARS, OR SINCE 2000 DOT COM BUBBLE! YOU GOT LUCKY, PLAIN AND SIMPLE. I BUILT A CUSTOMIZED TRADING SYSTEM THAT CAN TRADE SIDEWAYS, UP, OR DOWN MARKETS ON ANY TIME FRAME AND IN ANY MARKET, INCLUDING FOREX. I DID THE HARD WORK MONITORING, TWEAKING, TESTING, & TRADIN https://preview.redd.it/kp7dfkl63j4g1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=000e866cda82c52d427ef6e12be8cfde2cdfe124 G MY SYSTEM IN REAL TIME! AND KNOW I WONT SHARE IT. ONLY TRADERS NUILDING

Dangerous-Confetti

At the end of the day who really GAF if the market crashes. It recovers just as fast as it crashes. Unless there is some fundamental black swan effect that crushes the banking system. AI earnings are growing just as fast as their stock price (NVDA) No reason for a sustained crash. The .COM crash had shit companies with no substantial earnings increase. We aren't seeing the same with these AI companies. WIth NVDA's guidance at 65 billion for next quarter. Only reason u should ever consider taking your money out is if you plan on retiring soon. If not then just keep adding to your ROTH or IRA

StockHawk59

I was in your shoes back in the DOT COM bubble. NEVER made that mistake again. It was an expensive experience. 💰 GOOD LUCK 💰

Blooblack

u/EveryGazelle1 **Hello. Could you explain in more detail how to identify a market bottom?** Nobody can explain in detail how to identify a market bottom. All it takes is missiles being fired in the Middle East, or Japan or China doing something strange to their currencies or to the US debt they own, or a high US unemployment or inflation report, and the markets could fall even lower. **I thought I bought some stocks at a low point, but they continued to fall.** If I’m happy with the fundamentals of a company, then even if the stock falls, I’ll continue to hold. Long-term, the stock market goes up, so as long as the company still has (and increases) its customers, and doesn’t go bankrupt, eventually the stock – if it has fallen - is very likely to retrace from its low point**, and then you’ll be back in profit. In other words, you have to let time play its part in your investments.** **How long do you usually watch to confirm a rebound?** This only applies when a stock has crashed heavily in a relatively short time, like Crowdstrike did between July and August of last year. I typically wait for a series of ever higher end-of-trading-day lows, as the stock price zigzags back upwards. The closing price each trading day needs to be higher than the day before, over and over for a series of days, maybe even weeks. Obviously, not every single day will be higher than the day before, but in a selection of say two or three weeks, most days will be higher than the ones that came before them. This tells you that the stock is trending upwards. And even if a rebound happens and I buy in, isn’t it still possible for the price to drop further afterward? Yes. You can’t always wait for a stock to crash before you step into it, because a stock might never come down to a price you like. Also, a stock might crash because the company is in trouble and then stay down. Cheap can often get cheaper, and then disappear into insolvency. So, at some point you simply have to research a company, buy what you like, and hold it for a very long time, whether it falls or not. There are stocks like FIGMA which have continued to drop since their IPO, even though the company itself is doing well. With a stock like that, I’d typically wait for it to stop dropping, and to see multiple higher lows before deciding to buy it. At some point, maybe after a particularly good earnings report, such a company will typically reverse course and start climbing. When it looks like the uptrend has been confirmed, that’s when I’d buy it. **NOTE: No strategy is fool-proof.** The Federal Reserve could say or do something that causes the entire market to fall further, or a war or Covid could break out, and this would affect any – or most – stocks that you own.   **I’m not very good at reading charts.** Then spend more time doing it. Get into the habit of looking at what a stock you like has done in the past week, quarter, Year To Date, six months, 1 year, 2 years, etc. Practice looking at the same stock in different time frames, to see if there is any obvious trend or pattern. Find YouTube videos that at least explain lines of support and resistance, moving averages, Channels UP, Channels DOWN, Double Tops and Trendlines. And get into the habit of looking for these in stock charts. If you look a stock up on [FINVIZ.COM](http://FINVIZ.COM), you’ll often find that FINVIZ automatically draw lines Channels Up, Channels Down, lines of Support and lines of Resistance on the stock. Use those lines to determine whether you’re going to buy a stock or not.  But if you’re buying stock to hold for years, the small time-frames (e.g. the past week / month / quarter) shouldn’t control your decision to buy a particular stock, unless something dramatically good or bad happened within that small time frame.

Various-Talk8881

JEFFERSON: AI-RELATED STOCK GAINS UNLIKE DOT-COM BOOM LARGELY BECAUSE AI FIRMS HAVE ACTUAL EARNINGS bullish

Enough-Radish-4973

The term AI bubble bothers me.. Nobody gives any detail on what, why etc.. Just the blanket term if it doesn't materialize into revenue. I'm imagine there was this same argument when the internet and world wide web first starting rolling out to mainstream. Even when mobile phones turned more into PC rather than for just verbal communication. The honest truth is AI isn't really as innovative as the other grand technologies listed out.. It's just we are far far more away b/c of communication and media.. Someone should take a really close look at the growth of the .COM bubble.. It was obscene..

Rav_3d

>It appears the entire world is convinced AI is a bubble. If this is the prevailing sentiment, why would this not be priced in? Bingo. If everyone thinks there is a bubble, then naturally they will have pulled their money out of the market or even gone short. But other than a few noisemakers like Burry, there is no evidence that is happening. On the contrary, the NASDAQ 100 is down around 5%, well within the range of a normal, expected and healthy pullback. The Internet was in a "bubble" in late 1996, around the time Allan Greenspan gave his famous "irrational exuberance" speech. The market gained an additional 100% before that bubble burst. In early 2000, there was little talk of a bubble. It was a new world. The Internet ushered in a revolution that made higher stock valuations the new normal. There would be amazing companies like [PETS.COM](http://PETS.COM) that would profit (somehow) from this thing. Every pullback was a buying opportunity. It's not a bubble when everyone thinks it's a bubble.

Fantastic-Ice-1402

They sold their SSL certificate business to Symantec many years ago. Their cash cow is running the .COM registry where they get a percentage of every domain name (over 100M .com alone) on an annual basis when they renew.

TraitorTrump_1776

I believe we are in a bubble. However with AI is being supported at a government level I’ve been theorizing it may be more analogous to the space race of the ‘60s not the DOT-COM of the ‘90s. With that said I think we still have a long ways to ride.

johns2289

It ain’t over til someone comes out with PETS.COM ai

bartturner

I completely agree. I really do not think it is an unpopular opinion though. BTW, I am old and lived through the .COM era. But one things that is alike is OpenAI and Netscape. The two are so much alike and why at some point here nobody will once again have heard of OpenAI. Just like young people today never heard of Netscape. It is now going to happen even faster with the news that Google will be powering the new Siri.

Rav_3d

There are always bubbles in the market. Rare earths, some nuclear names, some quantum names, for example. These companies have no real revenue or earnings yet command very high valuations. It remains to be seen if the expected AI-related demand justifies these valuations. Likely not, but who knows how much higher they can go before they collapse? As for the Mag 7, there is no bubble. These are elite leading companies with lots of cash and strong revenue and earnings growth. This is quite a bit different than the PETS.COM and similar companies built on thin air that dominated the market in early 2000.

BorderKeeper

To quote Hank Green before the .COM bubble everyone knew they were in a bubble, they just didn’t know when it would pop… *and that’s exactly when it popped!*

NoCartographer4725

By this logic there many others with higher short interest. What do you say about them. Stocks with Short Interest > 60%: FLWS (1-800-FLOWERS.COM) - 110.74% Sector: Consumer Cyclical (Specialty Retail) Market Cap: ~$279M Index: Russell 2000 (IWM) TNGX (Tango Therapeutics) - 105.95% Sector: Healthcare (Biotechnology) Market Cap: ~$964M Index: Russell 2000 (IWM) BYND (Beyond Meat) - 71.02% Sector: Consumer Defensive (Packaged Foods) Market Cap: ~$1.42B Index: Russell 2000 (IWM) ZBIO (Zenas BioPharma) - 66.68% Sector: Healthcare (Biotechnology) Market Cap: ~$1.15B Index: Russell 2000 (IWM) AIRS (AirSculpt Technologies) - 62.86% Sector: Healthcare (Medical Care Facilities) Market Cap: ~$639M Index: Russell 2000 (IWM) Source — https://scalarfield.io/analysis/4f2e237a-e112-4639-8217-8e616e9bb327

Same_College2053

[COSTPLUSDRUGS.COM](http://COSTPLUSDRUGS.COM)

patricio83

I've bought stock with **BMPA (****BMP AI TECHNOLOGIES INC COM NEW)****.**

skilliard7

Have you actually considered that their earnings could decline? It's not just margin pressure from competitors, but also risk of declining volume: 1. Right now AI makes up the majority of VC funding. Big tech is spending the majority of their cash flows on datacenter buildouts for cloud capacity to sell to these VC funded firms, and then using the revenue they earn from selling AI capacity to fund these startups. Many, such as Meta and Oracle, are starting to rely on debt. 2. 95% of AI projects are failing to achieve revenue growth or cost savings, as per a MIT study. How can 25-35% growth in earnings be sustainable if AI is not providing a solid return on capital? 3.Tech has shown historically it can pivot very quickly: In the .COM bubble, telecoms and computer hardware manufacturers grew very quickly, but then earnings nosedived very quickly as capital dried up In 2020-2021, pretty much every major tech company was going to great lengths to hire as many engineers as possible, to the point they were hiring people to do nothing, just to have them on the bench. Engineers were seen as in short supply, so it became a competition to build a skilled team. All it took was 1 MAG7 company starting layoffs to get every single major tech company copying each other cutting headcount the past few years. My point with the above is AI can be very similar. Right now, all of big tech is aligned to compete to build as much AI compute capacity as possible. If just 1 big tech company signals caution with AI and starts backing off datacenter investments and hardware purchases, the entire industry could follow very quickly.

gogo_nagra

#I DON’T WATCH BASEBALL BUT ITS THE 12th INNING WITH A HOUR FREE PASS ON FOXSPORTS.COM

Physical-Cut4371

i found this ticker in my brokerage but it's says "KODIAK AI INC. C/WTS 25/09/2030(TO PUR COM) (KDKRW)". Does this mean the warrants could be exercises in 2030 only?

Covered_claw

People said the same BS during .COM bubble and every bubble when companies were trading at such high multiples and literally were not delivering shit. Everyone should catch themselves when they overlook fundamentals entirely and just follow the hype train. That said, the hype train is great if you know when to get off, which no one does, so if you get lucky its great. AKA its fucking gambling and no one knows whats happening

Rav_3d

That is my point. [PETS.COM](http://PETS.COM) had no revenue or sound plan to get any. People saw "pets" and "Internet" and went crazy. This is not what is happening today. Money is being thrown at real companies with real revenue and real opportunities for growth.

Historical_Stage2622

[US government pours cold water on Critical Metals deal - MINING.COM](https://www.mining.com/us-government-pours-cold-water-on-critical-metals-deal/) $CRML

Historical_Stage2622

[US government pours cold water on Critical Metals deal - MINING.COM](https://www.mining.com/us-government-pours-cold-water-on-critical-metals-deal/)

skilliard7

The point is that even if the AI bubble fails to provide good financial returns, the benefits to society are large. For example. the .COM bubble meant bad returns, but technology/the internet provided a ton of value to people's lives. If you are concerned with losing 60% of your investment, don't put 100% of your money into US market cap weighted indexes(which are tech heavy atm). Put some into international stocks, some into REITs, some into bonds, maybe even 1-2% into precious metals.

Enigmabulous

The stock market will implode. P/Es are out of control, it's just a matter of whether it is within the next year or maybe two years and then how big the collapse is. When all of the signs scream "absurdly inflated market," as they did during the .COM bubble, I think we should heed the signs. That doesn't mean you can't ride the wave and make a lot of $$$ in the mean time.

Top-Meaning2626

[ORCL will be the new CSCO IN THE DOT COM ANNIHILATION](https://x.com/zerohedge/status/1972144218651926753?s=19)

Rav_3d

I have no way to know how “overvalued” the market will get. In 1999 and 2000 valuations were MUCH higher than today. If the AI revolution rhymes with the Internet revolution, the buildout will continue at a rapid pace. In 2000, the bubble burst because companies were going public that had no business. Stocks like Phone.COM were over $200 and to this day I have no idea what their plan was to generate revenue. But at the time, few cared. It was a new world, new paradigm, PEs over 100 were the new normal. Today, we are led by the Mag 7. This is quite different from what was going on in 1999-2000. I don’t understand people’s propensity to argue with the market. We should be happy the market is irrationally exuberant. We should be happy invested in leading stocks that keep making all-time highs. We should be happy that we are in a powerful secular bull market that looks like it has more in the tank. I prefer to keep my personal opinions out of it and follow a consistent long-term investment strategy. I have friends who sold stocks in 2009 and STILL haven’t gotten back in. They’ll be working a lot more years than I will.

Ready2gambleboomer

*SPY500 P/E = 30. The last time it was that high was during the 1998-2002 ,COM bubble. That's "fairly highly valued" and before half you regards were even born. Now close the fucking door." ---JPowell.* *Pepperidge Farms remembers.*

tommyboy441

I did place a banbet for GOOGL $260 by COM Friday, I would place a banbet for draining the main vein if I could

skilliard7

That's why the CAPE ratio is a better metric for measuring if the market is overvalued, because it adjusts for cyclical earnings. https://www.multpl.com/shiller-pe CAPE right now is 40x. During the .COM bubble, it peaked at around 44x.

trumpdiego

"Interested in purchasing the REGARDS.COM domain name? Please enter the information below and we will contact you:" Should I start a gofundme to buy this and start the first WSB public co. ?

Ecstatic_Job_3467

The coward was likely aiming head or COM and missed badly. Nobody aims for the neck.

Rav_3d

1995-2000 was a heck of a ride. The fact I went through it is one reason I laugh when people compare today to 2000. Look at what the market did from 1996-2000 and compare it to 2021-now. We're not even close to being as stretched as we were in 1997 let alone 2000. I vividly remember early 2000. Everyone was "buying the dip" in Internet companies that had no revenue and no real business plan. Stocks like "Phone.COM" were trading over $300 and to this day I have no idea what they did. A similar AI bubble may be coming someday, but today's market feels nothing like 1999 or 2000.

Fukreddit011

FIG is a Total SCAM…. DOT COM BUBBLE 2.0

skilliard7

Analysts extrapolating out past earnings growth too far into the future without understanding the underlying product/service or the addressable market. The tech industry trades at about 40x earnings, that's a 2.5% earnings yield. Historically, the SP500 trades at about 16-17x earnings. But the argument isn't about whether or not tech is overvalued. The discussion is about if the SP500 is diversified. Google/Meta are both entirely dependent on digital ad sales(and spending obscene amounts on AI capex that will need to pay off to justify their valuation), Nvidia/Microsoft/Amazon's earnings growth is dependent on the AI boom(selling AI hardware or leasing it on their cloud) That's a lot of concentration revolving around AI. If AI does not work out as well as markets expect, similar to the 90's .COM boom, then we could see a 50-60% decline in the SP500 like we did then.

Jaded-Influence6184

Maybe there is a parallel to AI, but people fail to factor in that the reason for the DOT COM bubble bursting, is because almost all those companies were promising a lot, but in fact had no actual plan on how to monetize what they were building. Even Amazon and Facebook were nothing but losers for a decade (or more) until they finally managed how to make a positive cash flow. The rest took their money and evaporated (along with the money). At least with AI, people are trying to figure a way to monetize it as they are growing it out. So while it is maybe a worry still, it's not as much as in 2000. In 1999 I had a coworker who was sinking all his money into dot com companies, and ended up more broke than me no long after. :D. I learned there that companies can talk a lot, but if they can't show where they will be earning, walk away.

to_the_star4

DNN is doing the same thing that Amazon did in 1999 during the .COM bubble with convertible dept that allowed then to grow and build

MillionBEAR_

WE HAVE PASSED VALUATIONS FROM THE DOT COM ERA ^(and now rate cuts are coming to add jet fuel ⛽️)

Academic-Increase951

And the "AI bubble" is not like other bubbles. They are being developed by massively profitable companies with diversified cash flows and with more cash that they can spend. It's not like the .COM bubble with high evaluations and no revenue. And AI has both known application that will be incredibly valuable plus the unknown advancements that we just can't imagine yet. If in 10 years if our society isn't completely changed.. I'd be surprised.

Amplees

35x forward PE for AMD or NVIDIA or most software names is not a BUBBLE. .COM bubble was > 100x PE for ridiculous companies

BurstingTitan88

Bears after two days… I TOLD YOU THIS IS .COM PART 2!!!!

Historical_Stage2622

[Peabody–Anglo $3.8B coal deal on the brink after mine fire - MINING.COM](https://www.mining.com/peabody-anglo-3-8b-coal-deal-on-the-brink-after-mine-fire/)

peterpeer9

> Money isn't real. # ORIGINAL QUOTE BY ME COPYRIGHT© AND TRADEMARK™ BY ME @ 2025.COM

timeye13

Continue to bleed out MNDY.COM.

AAPLx4

WTF, now I have to go back and watch some documentaries on DOT COM Bubble

timeye13

MONDAY.COM to Europa on earnings.

cryptohorn

MARKETWATCH. COM "More people are late on both their mortgage and student-loan payments — another bad sign for the ECONOMY"

Zealousideal-Rush842

FOR everybody that was skeptical about my claim in the previous post please check [FTMO.COM](http://FTMO.COM)

Mother_Dig_5829

Ay Donny jr hit up yo father real quick sum sum “Americans have THE right to their guns!!! And now you can buy them online at GRABAGUN.COM!!!!”

foshizin

Ok these indexes are officially broken. Nvida’s making .COM bubble valuations look reasonable. I’d rather buy CSCO in the year 2000 than NVDA right now.