CPC

stayingcrossfaded

A simplistic way of putting it but yes. China's banks also hold more power than people think and aren't necessarily at the whim of the CPC

Ashmizen

CPC is chase private client. He has to have $250,000 minimum in his accounts. So yeah, sure, he has $0 here but there is at least $250k, likely a lot more, sitting in his other accounts.

Ashmizen

I have CPC checking. It’s Chase Private Client checking. You need to have $250,000 in accounts with them, minimum. So the money is just sitting in another linked account for sure lol…..

Master-Cicada1480

The problem continues to be addressed at national level mainly while it would require a common approach by the CPC Network acting collectively on the basis of the UCPD and targeting the platforms used for the promotion of crypto assets and related services.

Elean0rZ

I don't disagree with any of this, but this is also a very limited view of the crypto industry and the ways in which money can be made from it. For example, crypto is a lot more than crypto**currencies**, and things like NFTs (er, "digital collectibles" in China) are already big markets. Yes, they're operating on permissioned chains and will likely continue to do so, but down the road the expectation is that the "digital collectibles" themselves will be cross-chain compatible and interoperable with non-permissioned chains elsewhere. Which is to say, there can still be a large market for the things that happen ON the blockchain, even if the "currency" usecase specifically is restricted. And in that scenario, yes, Chinese demand for NFTs would absolutely float all boats. And then there's the bigger picture of blockchain infrastructure and development. Many blockchain developers have Chinese connections, and plenty of services do too (exchanges, custody solutions, blah blah blah). The argument is that if blockchain continues to grow, it will have significant economic benefits for countries that embrace it. China is already profiting from that industry, and is well-positioned to continue doing so *even if the fruits of its people's labours aren't directly available to them* (hell, crypto is explicitly listed in the CPC's current 5-year plan). You don't have to use crypto as crypto to profit from building and providing services to the industry. It's true that Armstrong is playing on American fears around China (which is a whole other conversation), but the point is the same regardless of which country(ies) you look at. If the blockchain industry grows, and the US doesn't participate in it, then that economic impact will go elsewhere. Whether it's China or Europe or Timbuktu is irrelevant to the point.

Umilik

I feel you on that. I was a big Jody Wilson-Reybould fan (I'm indigenous, so I have some clear bias there, but she's always been such an honest & transparent person, even before she got elected with the LPC), and the moment the SNC scandal blew up, I thought they were done for good. I'm amazed that they haven't been booted from office yet. Doesn't help that the CPC picked two AWFUL leaders in a row, and that Jagmeet Singh is a parody (in my eyes at least) of a political leader.

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; Canada investigates OpenAI Canada's Personal Information Protection Commission (CPC) announced on the 4th that it has launched an investigation into... *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.*

RelativeTurbulent265

Yeah fun times so many Chinese coins were hyped back then. HPB / CPC / MAN Most of them -99% lost lots of money on those!

SoylentYellow05

I suspect it's more likely that China will turn a blind eye in order to profit from crypto in its special administrative zones while on the 'mainland' it will continue to work on it's own CBDC. I don't see any alignment between CPC policy and decentralised currencies that they can't control. They are at complete opposite ends of the spectrum.

FancyTeacupLore

This is not a bad idea. I'm sure the Adwords CPC is saturated for it though.

therealsuperbonbon

Yes, I'm well aware of all that. Never said anything about CZ having ties with the Chinese government. All I said was that he is from China, hence there is a connection. Also, it's CCP, not CPC, since we're mincing words over here

lucille_bluth_91

Lol, nah. I don't want CPC NFTs.

market_theory

Backward CPC.

proggR

PP is a clueless tool. Every time his name has surfaced alongside Bitcoin/crypto its the most cringey thing I've ever seen in our politics... and that's saying something. He claims he wants Canada to be a leading nation in blockchain. Cool... we already kind of are as uncharacteristically forward facing as it is for us. We have a large and growing blockchain developer scene, all while the Bank of Canada has been diving head first into CBDC R&D projects for years now, and is seemingly going to end up one of the first western nations adequately prepared for their release. Rather than greasing the wheels on blockchain projects specifically, we need to be prioritizing SME more generally. PP is just trying to ride the coattails of crypto to seem hip and/or with it to a younger cohort of voters. But PP is neither hip nor with it, he's just a career politician grifting from public coffers for a living, attempting to divide the populous by stirring up anger and rage. For all the complaints about Trudeau being underqualified because he was a drama teacher... the CPC sure does like picking candidates with literally 0 real world experience (Scheer and now Poilevre).

llama_bunny

I suggest u research bill c 249 introduced by MP Rempel Garner (CPC) and the response of the LIBERAL minister of finance … tldr blockchain innovation is getting funding in Canada And no it is not the government of Canada’s responsibility to enforce the on ramp of crypto payments for private businesses 🥴

zack14981

Following public health orders is also part of owning a private business. I know that you might have a hard time grasping multi-faceted concepts but there is more than one element to running a legal business. As the CPC would put it. “Don’t like it? Leave!”

ScottIBM

A misleading title. He's the leader of the CPC, and only at an election is there a remote chance he's a PM candidate. Even then, he's still just the party leader and might get the option to form the government. Until that point he's just the CPC leader.

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; The Conservative Party of Canada (CPC) elected Pierre Poilievre as the party’s new leader on Saturday. Pierre believes that Canadians should have access to Bitcoin as an alternative to the official currency, as opposed to the development of a central bank digital currency. He also wants to make Canada a hub for blockchain businesses. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.*

Spartan05089234

Ok so are you telling me that if I heard the bitcoin hype in 2021, put my money in, I WOULDN'T be hugely down? Because I'm pretty sure I would be. The fact that some people can make money on crypto doesn't take away from the overwhelming narrative in crypto of "throw your money in and watch it 10x" and if you want to pretend that isn't an issue, you should vote PPC not CPC.

PM_ME_V4G1N4

15$ well spent!! Go PP! (CPC party membership fee)

gigalongdong

CPC* It's the Communist Party of China, not the Chinese Communist Party. I think the fact that this has happened, shows the rapid decline of US hegemony across the globe. Without the petrodollar being the only currency oil is traded in, the US will lose much of its' soft power and economic influence. I'd argue that a multipolar world is an infinitely better situation than a unipolar world in general(for everyone except the US ultra rich), and therefore there will be an increase in the use of bitcoin. THIS BE GOOD FOR BITCOIN.

dotaudiences

We are happy to share our latest case study with ArsenalNFT! Great results were achieved, such as High ROI with a CPC under $0.08 targeting a mix of Tier 1 US/Canada, and International Traffic. https://dotaudiences.com/case-study-arsenalnft Any Questions? Hit my DM!

Boss-Lumberjack

The voters Trudeau is losing aren’t voting CPC in the next election lol. As long as the NDP and Liberals are comfortable with a coalition, the CPC is going to be on the outside looking in. …you don’t need the popular vote to win, you need a little more than 30% of the available seats. …American Republicans aren’t doing Canadian Conservative voters any favours right now either. If the CPC even touches the abortion issue, it’s lights out. …and they often do try to mimic Republican policy to pander to a certain segment of their voters. …it’ll be a fun one to watch, though.

Mr_1nternational

Dude. Trudeau lost the popular vote last election. O'toole and the CPC got the most votes. Trudeaus popularity has only gone down since then.

Boss-Lumberjack

Rich people tend to pay for party memberships, poor people tend not to. Most poor Canadians aren’t voting CPC, and most Canadians aren’t rich lol. Big crowds and paid memberships don’t always translate to political victory, especially in a system with more than two viable options available. …furthermore, the CPC is bleeding base support to the PPC (which is hilarious in it’s own way). ..there’s simply not enough right-leaning Canadians to support two right-wing parties. If they’re not unified they have almost no chance of usurping the leading left-wing candidate of the day (which is currently Justin Trudeau).

Mr_1nternational

He's drawing big crowds. He's the most popular CPC candidate and they have "set a record for the largest number of paid members of any political party in Canadian history." https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/cpc-leadership-membership-sales-1.6477819

Boss-Lumberjack

lmao tell that to the CPC and the unbuttered white bread they keep putting up to run against him. The lack of charisma coming out of the Conservative party is going to keep hurting them in the voting booth. Until the CPC or NDP put up a better candidate (which doesn’t seem like it should be THAT difficult), Trudeau will remain in power.

avibox954

I would be surprised because it is my belief that the elections have always been rigged by the global bankers. They would not someone like Poilievre to be the leader of the CPC.

h0twired

The party will split if Skippy wins. It will also split if Charest wins. Long story short. The CPC will remain on the outside looking in.

BeardFondler

If you're serious about it, go get a CPC membership and then vote for PP in the Conservative Party leadership election this September. The membership fee is super cheap.

perfect5-7-with-rice

What makes him irrelevant? The CPC in Canada (top 2 biggest party, always them or the liberals win) have to pick a new leader this year. PP is **By far** the leading candidate for CPC leadership according to polls (25% higher than #2). https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Conservative_Party_of_Canada_leadership_election#:~:text=During%20the%20review%2C%20held%20on,Candice%20Bergen%20as%20interim%20leader. Whoever wins the CPC vote will be automatically the PM during the next election, if the CPC wins (assuming he is not replaced before then). The party leadership race is technically the only race the PM has to win, since the federal election is technically a vote for the party, not the candidate.

ouyin2000

Even if he wins the CPC leadership, he won't automatically become candidate for PM. There's a whole other federal election to hurdle over.

ouyin2000

Mr. P.P. is not running for Prime Minister. He's candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of Canada. The CPC is only the Official Opposition at this point in time.

UranusisGolden

You dont understand Google. I was a google investor and I ll give you an opinion as such. Google founders and owners have full control of the company. Back when I owned shares they did a stock split. Class A had 1 vote. Class B 10 votes Class c has no vote. Class b only goes to them internally. Regular investors got Class A and C. This is how the owners retain control. They will do everything to keep control of the company. They don't care for investor gains. Luckily they manage the company more or less ok. They are not perfect but Google is too big to fail. CPC has been going down for years and revenue goes downhill but they are still healthy because they dominate the world as the top search engine. They won't be in crypto because they don't need crypto. They need centralized information. Decentralized anything is not something Google can index for profit.

Just-Blow-Into-It

Probably cause you said `running for PM` which technically right now he is `running to be the CPC leader`. Either way, he is still considered a candidate though.

Just-Blow-Into-It

The word candidate is a loose umbrella term by definition. You are talking about the nominee, of a political party or more technically an [Incumbent](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incumbent) rather than a `candidate`. [Candidates in elections](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Candidate#Candidates_in_elections) * In the context of elections for public office in a representational partisan democracy, a candidate who has been selected by a political party is normally said to be the `nominee` of that party. The party's selection (that is, the nomination) is typically accomplished either based on one or more primary elections according to the rules of the party and any applicable election laws. * Candidates are called "incumbents" if they are already serving in the office for which they are seeking re-election, or "challengers", if they are `seeking to replace an incumbent`. * Pierre Poilievre is a `candidate` seeking to become the CPC `incumbent`. Statement 1: True * Pierre Poilievre is one that aspires for office. Statement 2: True * A `candidate` is one that aspires to or is nominated or qualified for an office, membership, or award. Statement 3: True * `Statement 1 is true` AND `Statement 2 is true` THEREFORE Pierre Poilievre is by definition a `candidate` It doesn't matter if he never wins and becomes the leader of the CPC. He is still considered `Canadian Prime Minister candidate` (the title of this post). Unless you want to fucking argue with a dictionary?

dbdev

He’s got a great shot at being the next leader of the CPC. Definitely the best of all the other CPC leadership candidates.

discourseur

He is a known right-wing nut. He is officially running to become the next head of the Conservative Party of Canada (CPC). He was a supporter of the “freedom convoy” and got a lot of flak for it. He later said he never supported them even though he took videos.

AgentProvocateur666

I’d hardly called him a candidate for PM. Maybe more like candidate for leader of the CPC/official opposition.

YoFamYouGotADollar

It’s cool he’s pro crypto but remember folks, don’t be a single issue voter. This dude and the CPC and bonafide pieces of shit

Evan_Kelmp

Jesus this is a shit post. PP isn’t even a party leader, the guys a talking head who has never had a real job before becoming a politician. His whole political mentality is just saying Justin Trudeau sucks vote for me. I’ve always voted conservative but this guy isn’t the guy to win over JT I hope to god he isn’t the CPC leader or we are doomed again. Also we do have the freedom to use Bitcoin. Every Canadian does if they want to it’s super easy to get so I don’t know what kind of quote this even is.

tigerslices

by dropping social conservative beliefs, what do you mean? i believe stephen harper only was in power as long as he was BECAUSE he held as many centrists as possible by not going after things like gay marriage, abortion, and being as silent as he could be on environmental protections. the only way the cpc has a chance to win is if they sound more rational than the liberals. right now, that's tough - because while the People's Party of Canada makes the CPC look like a pride parade, it also removes FAR TOO MANY of the cpc's former voter base. the cpc needs to become more center than ever. appeal to feminists, even if just the Terfy ones.

FenaPugi

~~Australia~~ Liberal National Party* They're pretty much a b-tech CPC

AlexJamesCook

Aaah huh? Tell me you don't care about the residents of Ottawa without telling me you don't care about the residents of Ottawa. As for Hitler. GTFO. I FUCKING HATE THIS COMPARISON!!! IT'S FUCKING STUPID, AND BEYOND RIDICULOUS. Wanna know what authoritarianism looks like? Go to fucking Burma/Myanmar, North Korea, Iran. Be a woman in Pakistan or India. Be a woman in Saudi Arabia. THAT is oppression. The cops gave these idiots several warnings over several days to take their trucks and leave. They refused to do so. No one said they couldn't wave their placards on the lawns of Parliament House. No one said they couldn't dance in the streets. They were asked to stop blocking traffic. Furthermore, Tamara Lich is one of those, "Sovereign Citizen" types. She's a complete airhead. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. Trudeau may be a neoliberal in sheep's clothing. He may say and do dumb things, but one thing he is not doing or imploring for, is the systematic round up of citizens, locking up dissidents, shutting down parliament and arresting dissenters. If that were the case, the CPC MPs who joined the protests would also be facing severe sanctions. In fact, the entire CPC would be shutdown, Fox News would be shut off in Canada via the CRTC. There are sooo many things that Trudeau would have to do in order to be even close to a dictator. Hell, Trump is more authoritarian than Trudeau, and conservatives are licking his balls, toupee and all. Goddamn it. Please open your fucking eyes and appreciate what REAL authoritarianism looks like before employing Godwin's Law. GODDAMN IT MAN! You're supposed to be intelligent enough to utilize cryptocurrency and advocate its uses, yet you cannot differentiate between a murderous psychopath who implemented/oversaw the systematic murder of 6 million people solely based on ethnicity and a buffoon who plays dress up inappropriately. Seriously. The Australian PM is more authoritarian than Trudeau. So please, before calling Trudeau the 4th coming of the German Reich, open a fucking book about the 200 or so world leaders.

WheresTheButterAt

You don't have to like Trudeau because you dislike the CPC. Both can be bad. And they are.

ALiteralHamSandwich

No, I know the CPC is full of utterly garbage options.

p-queue

This article is quite misleading. You’d expect that from the National Review (who also have referred to crypto as something only useful to criminals.) The intentions of the government is to make crypto exchanges and crowdfunding facilitators that operate in Canada subject to the same reporting requirements as other businesses which move significant amounts of capital. This was part of their 2021 election policy and has little to do with the powers provided under the Emergencies Act. If crypto is to take the step into mainstream and really start having an impact on financial transactions these sorts of reporting requirements are necessary. The rest of the g20 is doing the same. More relevant, a CPC gov in Canada would also be doing the same. Don’t let our media turn you into a rube.

aradil

It should not be legal to fund political actions in another country. Otherwise the US could just straight up buy political parties in Canada (oops, that seems to be exactly what the CPC wants, then sweet Trump bucks).

Spotthedot99

Holy fuck this thread. Rant incoming. Several of our country's economic ports were shut down by admittedly very well organized groups, impacting jobs and money on both sides of the border. Everyone screeching for worker rights, what about those workers impacted by the blockades? Or the ones being harassed by protesters? Oh we don't care about those workers? Like the international truckers that couldn't cross the border to do their jobs, fuck them right? Literally the group the protests originally formed for, being pushed aside now that the co-opting forces can't contain themselves. And the reports that ex military and ex rcmp are involved in the tactical shut down of economic routes, do those not bother any of you? Or are those just fabrications? Just government agents crippling our economy, or I guess to your mind they're just "patriots?" Are you so anti government that you actually support a crowd funded attack on Canada? Because that's what happened. I get it. We're all into crypto for the tech and the "freedom" (shudder), suddenly. And everytime some one steps in and puts in a regulation, we got to grab our pitchforks. But seriously, this thread? Trudeau may not even be decent but fuck, the CPC and PPC have fielded actual dog shit candidates. You want to talk divisiness? How about those trash monkeys not even able to admit that climate change is an issue and wanting to regress social issues that the majority agrees with. Field an actual right wing candidate that has some personality that isn't some maga freak. Get American style politics out of Canada, thats my pipe dream. How about field a platform instead of "everything that Lib did was wrong! Freedom!" I digress. What happened was a concerted effort to cripple Canada's economy. Local agents of all stripes getting money from all across the world through various channels to cause chaos on an already beleaguered citizenship. Yall call Trudeau a pussy for doing nothing, then he takes a hard line on not protesters, but specifically the people blockading the trade routes, and you call him a tyrant. Its too early for this shit. There was an article just a few days ago saying Canada wants to be a crypto leader. I still think that can be the case, but its going to come with regulations. And unfortunately, when events like these last few weeks come up, the perception now isn't good. Its scary for everyone when a group, for whatever motivation, can hobble our economy and find international financial backing. And Trudeau has already used a national travesty (cough, Nova Scotia, cough) to push through regulations. This is definitely something to be concerned about. But, like I said before FIELD AN ACTUAL FUCKING CANDIDATE THAT ISNT SOME MAGA MEME BS. I, a life long lefty, would actually vote con of you could actually do it, cause I was done with Trudeau once he legalized weed and broke his reform promise. And Singh is great at speaking out and I think he'll be good at growing NDP voter ranks for a few years but he won't ever win. But if you want mass adoption, it's going to come with regulations. That just reality. I guess you're going to have to decide what you want? Your hobby coins to stay underground so you can be edgy anti conformist, or the coins to go mainstream so its an valid commodity? Coffee just kicked in. Time to work and wait for downvotes and counter rants.

EClarkee

Because the CPC is a dumpster fire of a party and they’re continually getting worse. They had a real shot with a moderate leader but decided he was too moderate and have now put a MAGA loving interim leader in his spot. Liberals win because CPC doesn’t know how to sway voters. Justin may be shooting himself in the foot this time for them though.

jok3r925

> Hold Chinese Crypto > Post a picture of Winnie the Pooh > Social Credit Score Drop > Your Chinese Crypto Account Frozen and your Crypto Confiscated Yeah don't think anyone who isn't a CPC Boss would want this

marsangelo

This is spot on^ i actually didnt mind o’toole on a couple topics unfortunately he was so concerned with the support of his party he was almost always double speaking. Not only did it make the platform seem incoherent i couldnt trust someone so ambivalent on the issues. This is nothing more than the CPC pandering to the far right trying to tap into the anger and frustration at trudeau and the pandemic. Basically searching for trudeau haters at this point

pudds

As long as the CPC keeps coddling the social conservative and far right portion of their base, they will never get back in power. O'Toole actually made the election close despite massive momentum for the liberals going in, because he moved the party. And yet, the CPC ousted him because that wasn't the platform he ran on during the leadership campaign. That tells me that the caucus is not interested in moving center, which means someone like pierre poilievre is probably going to win the leadership race this time. That part of the CPC is out of alignment with the rest of Canada, and all its going to do is get them more votes in Alberta where they don't need them anyway. Trudeau keeps winning because the CPC's platform does not appeal to 70% of Canadians.

pudds

See my reply to the other poster if you need more. Pierre is an asshole is simply easier to type. It's easy to find out why. I hope the conservatives do pick him, he's unelectable. (Also younger than Trudeau was when the CPC ran the "he's just not ready" ads, amusingly.)

1nva11d

Honestly this is the only guy I'd consider switching back to voting CPC for. Problem is, most of today's Conservative Party are certified left wing liberals, and every bit as corrupt/corruptible as their American Democrat counterparts.

FourSquarex4

CornPopCoin CPC

PiedDansLePlat

Lebron may have understand CPC

Changeurblinkerfluid

If you’re surprised by this, just wait until you read more about the CPC. And with that comment, I can no longer visit China.

bikbar1

Those are probably run by CPC officials themselves. They are sacrificing their ideals of communism to save people from capitalistic profits. /s

onewheelonelove

$HERO $SYS $RFOX $CPC $ZKS $CKB Mark my words

bikbar1

That's a way better decision than those CPC idiots.

1nva11d

lol fuck I love that guy If he were to lead the CPC I might even consider voting again.

bikbar1

So is CPC of China, they just don't want their citizens to be rich without their approval.

21_Bridges

Lmao. Munger really tried to shit on crypto AND praise CPC. The gall of this old dino!

_yxs_

You can tell how scummy someone is when they give praise to CPC lmao

CookieDelivery

Just the YouTube ads on his videos make him shittons of money already. Advertisers pay a lot to get seen by people interested in crypto. Ads on those kinds of videos have a very high CPC. Not saying it's a bad thing to get paid for work at all, by the way. However, every crypto YouTuber is getting way more views because it's a bull market. So they want the bull market to last as long as possible. That makes them biased and overly bullish.

baconcheeseburgarian

The metrics paint a completely opposite story of decreasing transactions, decreased monthly payouts (which suggest decreased ad revenue) and published ad rates that are half the minimum amount Google charges for CPC. I like BAT but the metrics have been absolutely terrible since July 2020.

nood1z

I dunno man, a government that actually gives a fuck about social stability is a pretty good idea I think. Isn't that what governments supposed to be doing with all that state power, maintaining the stability of the society so things like civil war or famine and starvation doesn't happen- or is government just supposed to be there to get tax money and splodge it all on weapons to attack other societies with or finding ways to pay well connected cronies and their corporations. Maybe when your last famine was in the 1970's and your society has been through what China has been through in the past hundred years or more, it effects ones perspective. China used top be poorer than the DRC! Generally speaking I think we should meet societies where they are, instead of condemning them for not having our same Western standards or sensibilities. sure we can slag the Chinese off all day for not being sufficiently American or British in their outlook, for insisting on being Chinese all the time, but at the end of the day does shit-posting on facebook really mean lot compared to the (if I recall correctly) Three Assurances and Two Guarantees to their people (food, clothing, somewhere to live, an education, and employment). I can't condemn a state that makes a big deal about those basics, many people who live in third world countries would love it if their government promised at least those things, never mind all the other stuff Western countries go on about a lot. Even with human rights, poverty reduction and ensuring everyone gets somewhere to live seems like a pretty solid human rights principals in my opinion, it can't all be just about Muh Property. Sure, it's not what your average American 'Sovereign Citizen' types might be interested in but still. CPC isn't perfect, but they've get enough right over the years and considering the US history of genocide, slavery and imperialism I really don't see why they think they get to lay into the Chinese all the time, that's all. Full disclosure, I've not been convinced by US accusations about genocide in China, I doubt the Uigurs in China have as much problems with their government than Afro Americans do, I've never seen a Uigur being gunned down in the street or slowly chocked to death by some leering pork-chop, I don't see China's prison system mostly locking up minorities, it's not even as big as the US prison state (which is vast, slavery is basically still legal there!) So far all I see is the usual WMD- grade perception management and narrative building to justify US next juicy tasty profitable Cold War they want to have. /ramble.

nood1z

That read doesn't make any sense, if they have bags to look after then why would they ban it? The CPC considers itself a democratic entity, and the fact that they do actually seek feedback from their population on their policies to a very real and meaningful degree, and learn from their mistakes- is why it is said that in the US you can change the Party but you can never change policy, but in China you can change policy but you can never change the party.

baconcheeseburgarian

They have a couple of major brands but the metrics after July of 2020 look terrible. If users are given 70% of the revenue from advertising we can see in the data that monthly average volume has dropped to it's lowest level since Brave Rewards has been active. This is a published rate that is $.16 less than the lowest rate Google charges for CPC. I've got a pretty substantial bag, but the metrics do not look promising for BAT as an ad platform. Growth has slowed dramatically over the last year.

Maleficent_Ad1004

FUCK THE CCP! USA USA USA on a serious note, why do you ignorant people keep using this "CCP" when it's officially "CPC". like, how would you feel if China kept calling you something lame like "ASU".

AhwahneeBanff

I am pro China & CPC and I love Crypto. AMA.

Maleficent_Ad1004

As for there not being a "best" - I agree, there is no best, because every country has unique contexts and path dependence. When I said "best", I meant "to the extent that they can be compared" on the most important aspects of society, since *somebody* has to be best. However, this point actually also should alleviate your hate for the CPC - this idea of historical path dependence. It is the way it is because of all the historical forces. No single individual woke up one day and decided to do evil, not in China, not anywhere. It is fundamental attribution error (in the clinical psychology sense) to say China is bad and the Chinese have no morality, etc.

poomata

It is already happening in China. Use the digital Yen against the wishes of CPC, and you’re “credit score” risk being downgraded.

ContextSwitchKiller

Thanks for providing a direct link - much appreciated! Time to break it all down & see who it does not apply to in China. Have feeling & strong hunch [Andrew Bolstein, senior vice president of Operations for the Shanghai Disneyland Resort](https://attractionsmagazine.com/shanghai-disneyland-senior-vp-gives-tour-of-new-safety-procedures/), will still be using crypto in some way/shape/form with some CCP/CPC minion watchdogs turning a blind eye.

Voidembracer

Go CPC, crypto is controlled by billionaires and extremely prone to manipulations.

Wess-L

CPC shorting the market confirmed.

xdebug-error

He probably will if max max gets enough of the CPC votes

PeterShiffindisguise

PPC and CPC seem to be the only ones who half give a shit about the regular population, so I'm not surprised.

2018CryptoTrader

While we fighting for ETH to 4K, BTC to 50k, MOON to $1, unknown coin CPC did 10x in a day and still holding . Wtf .

RandomTask100

China gov't hides deadly outbreak, kills muslims and ALSO wants to help us avoid risky investments. I don't know why, guys, but I trust the CPC. It's like they're always watching over me.

rexfordays

And your CPC goes down every epoch

GramTheDon

It's neutral overall. Yes, China expanding soft power through its companies isn't great (and every company in China has at least some ties to CPC). They are infamous for using these kinds of deals to infiltrate and steal technology from other countries. But this is expanding access to blockchain and development, which is good. And it's separate from the Chinese entity, at least in name, so that's optimistic.

gamma55

US NASDAQ-listed corporation probably has resevations about a coin with CPC-connections.

P3P3X

Yep, the CPC (copy pasta crew) are still out in force and throwing everything at the wall 👀

Elean0rZ

This "China will regret" narrative continues to be uninformed, and Bitcoin maxis continue to miss the point by making it solely about Bitcoin. China wants control over its money and wants to empower its CBDC Yuan. No shit--China's gonna China on that one. But, even as evangelists like Sylvain refuse to acknowledge it, crypto is so much more than Bitcoin, and China is among the most proactive places in the world when it comes to fostering crypto innovation more generally. They manufacture nearly every piece of hardware used to mine Bitcoin or any other crypto. They are actively using blockchain tech in smart cities, supply chain and inventory tracking, and other uses. A ton of crypto projects continue to develop and be incubated there. The top crypto exchange by volume has one foot squarely in China. We have no reason to believe the CPC doesn't hold BTC or other cryptos and profit off them. Whatever one might think about China in general, it's NOT anti-crypto.

ABoutDeSouffle

NEO, EOS, XTZ, CPC, ONE, HPB, TRX, ZIL, QTUM, who still remembers them now?

heyheoy

That can also be a case, idk if the founders of mining companies (antpools and others) are members of CPC, many Chinese citizens are from youth, but its not public

bobofartt

You’re totally right, I don’t think your fears are unfounded. For the liberals performative social policies and climate change would be catastrophic for crypto in Canada (At least under Trudeau, I’m not a JT bashed at all, I voted for him in his first election, it’s just a fact). And for the NDP having a financial system out of their control wouldn’t fly. I would picture much more strict tax policy under them. Possibly even a ban as they complain about it being a “rich person play ground” or something like that. That leaves (realistically, the PPC and Greens don’t matter and the BQ aren’t relevant for 80+% of Canadians.) the CPC. Now theoretically they would be the best party to vote for regarding this issue, but historically they haven’t followed through with their promises regarding financial policy. And as their names suggest (CONSERVATIVE) they wouldn’t be interested in a subversive financial system that plays against their donators and themselves. I honestly think our hands are tied when it comes to who to vote for, I don’t honestly think there is a party in Canada that would be “pro crypto” and the most we can hope for is that we flies under the radar of the feds until we are too big to do anything about. You have inspired me to contact both my provincial and federal representatives to ask though, until now I was just resigned to a negative outcome, but there is no harm in checking. Especially if it gives clarity. Sorry for the verbal explosion. Thank you for making me think :)

DCD-NOT-DFV

The Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) is made up of nearly 100 members standing up for progressive ideals in Washington and throughout the country. Since 1991, the CPC has advocated for progressive policies that prioritize working Americans over corporate interests, fight economic and social inequality, and advance civil liberties. The CPC champions progressive policy solutions like comprehensive immigration reform, good-paying jobs, fair trade, universal health care, debt-free college, climate action, and a just foreign policy. The caucus, which consists of 95 House members and one Senator, has been the leading voice calling for bold and sweeping solutions to the urgent crises facing this nation, including ending America’s broken for-profit health care system, raising the minimum wage, eliminating political corruption, bolstering labor protections for working families, and taking swift action to stop the warming of our planet.

rexfordays

Oh, no worries. Well, it's not too late to DCA into it. Plus staking rewards are always reducing your overall CPC.

rezz415

I wonder.... Yes, China stopped mining but do they possibly own a vast majority of over all supply of BTC. How do we know some of the top wallets aren't bases in China or belong to the CPC? Where did all the mined BTC by the Chinese (which is mostly likely also state owned companies) end up? They might have stopped mining but I'm sure they would not have left empty handed given the vastly long start time they had over the West in BTC.

k-smoooth

[yes](https://wendys-careers.com/?utm_source=Google&utm_medium=CPC&utm_campaign=Wendy%27s%202021%20-%20Major%20Markets%20-%20Branded%20Terms%20and%20Competitors&utm_content=Responsive%20Ad&gclid=CjwKCAjwruSHBhAtEiwA_qCpppdi0Xsk09USg74cNRYvSY6wSU3r0VsCcrxbGr5aNi_6Bdw_avdrahoCA_EQAvD_BwE)

GalactikosOne

It’s CPC dude. CCP, is a naughty/clever CIA concoction, to subliminally, link the CPC to the CCCP! The MsM happily lapped it up, and the rest, as they say, is history.

nineqp

There is always a catch. No business goes into China and is successful without giving the CPC something in return.

rexfordays

At least you're staking and your CPC goes down all the time.

Vivarevo

Well if you are after the dissidents, wrong thinkers, critics. Then it makes sense to lure then in with a sympathetic face. China has done it before. The Hundred Flowers Campaign, also termed the Hundred Flowers Movement, was a period from 1956 to 1957 in the People's Republic of China during which the Communist Party of China (CPC) encouraged citizens to express openly their opinions of the communist party. Following the failure of the campaign, CPC Chairman Mao Zedong conducted an ideological crack down on those who criticized the party, which continued through 1959. Observers differ as to whether Mao was genuinely surprised by the extent and seriousness of the criticism, or whether **The Hundred Flowers Campaign was in fact a premeditated effort to identify, persecute, and silence critics of the party.**

390TrainsOfficial

Are you surprised that he's spreading FUD? He's saying what the CPC are telling him to say.

rexfordays

Same same. I keep making small buys and I'm staking so my CPC keeps dropping (with the price!!!!111!killme) so I'm optimistic long term.

Zeppelin0

Very true! Now the hash rate cannot be dropped at the whim of the Chinese government, because… it already happened! Here’s what concerns me: by law, every single corporation in China is majority owned by the government. I don’t know a ton about these bitcoin mining farms, but I imagine some of them are corporate entities and have been contributing a significant amount to the hashrate. If all of that is true: we should view these entities **as** the CPC themselves. It doesn’t have to be ‘Chinese Government vs Chinese Farmers’, it can be ‘Chinese Government/Chinese Farmers vs other Farmers’. This can very well just be the country of China setting up their businesses in different jurisdictions and diversifying (and strengthening) their position economically and within the crypto markets. Please, anyone correct me if any of this is unfounded. They’re simply my uneducated musings.