FIN

goredcrasp

Kuji. Low MC high TVL. Fast, decentralised. All coins in circulation, no dilution to happen, real yield I still expect to become a trend once DeFi-chains really kick in. Team works to bring more liquidity and oracle trading in FIN (juju’s own very user friendly DEX) bringing more liquidity around the price movement. Real fees, real yield, real potential. Fast, secure, cheap to use. I have a big bag…

Mullick

Change it to a FIN for Finney and I’m in

silent_tongue

Basically everything. You can - stake in the wallet and gain real yield in multiple coins, - place LP in BOW, buy/sell on FIN, -has its own stablecoin USK that you can mint by collateralising Atom, stAtom, Dot, weth and many more, - lend and borrow on GHOST, - and my favourite which is bidding for liquidation on OCRA.

thedarkpampers

Kujira's FIN

Morning_Star_Ritual

Nice write up. Here’s my take: it was a security but time has passed and we can’t go back and regulate something that has evolved. ETH is in the same sort of spot as btc was before the March, 2013 FinCEN guidance paper: **Users of Virtual Currency** **A user who obtains convertible virtual currency and uses it to purchase real or virtual goods or services is not an MSB under FinCEN’s regulations. Such activity, in and of itself, does not fit within the definition of “money transmission services” and therefore is not subject to FinCEN’s registration, reporting, and recordkeeping regulations for MSBs.** Before this it sort of was “is it legal for us to use this? Will we one day be regulated out of existence? Im just a snow plow polisher, so grain of salt, but I feel we will soon finally have some sort of legal event that finally removes the cloud over ETH….and any fear of it being a security will go the way the fear of bitcoin “even being legal to use” ETH is over 50% of my holdings. But I don’t fool myself. After the DAO Hack fork it sort of is clear that ETH is closer to a firm then gold or corn. And I prefer not to think about what The Merge or Shapella means when we try to debate both sides. Which we should always do. At this point I believe if Vitalik and the Foundation disappeared ETH would be fine. Wind the clock back to certain points in ethereum’s existence….I’m not sure that would be the case at all. What is key is to go back and look at all the arguments defending ETH. One of the strongest ones was ETH being POW. Here’s the Sauce if you rightfully want to read sources yourself and not trust the judgement of a mouth breathing snow plow polisher who watches YouTube tutorials on how to change a lightbulb. https://www.fincen.gov/sites/default/files/shared/FIN-2013-G001.pdf If you want to firm up your own view on the matter, here’s a descent 2018 WSJ article on the issue. https://www.wsj.com/articles/worlds-second-most-valuable-cryptocurrency-under-regulatory-scrutiny-1525167000 As well as a Cointelegraph 2018 article if you don’t want to be paywalled. https://cointelegraph.com/news/it-never-was-a-security-ethereum-under-the-regulatory-spotlight

luckor

May I interest you in the new Luckor FIN? It has luck in the name! Can’t fail with that. Quick, get some of the 99 trillion minted $LULZ, they were last traded at $1 each (by me).

BrOhio_216

Yeah maybe it's just me coping with my own remiss apathy. But no I don't buy in bc I don't trust the system itself and every knowledgeable FIN guy I talk to says sure you can play with maybe 2 or 3 percent of your investments by buying in but more than that isn't smart l.

JoeFlowFoSho

Kujira has cross chain functionality, it's liquidation hub has Weth, BNB, DOT, and PAXG. FIN, their CLOB Dex has pairs for all of those too trade, and on BOW you can provide liquidity and get fees and incentives like any other LP. The big difference is the yield you earn is non-inflationary. Not quite Thor-chain level cross chain but pretty close. Worth checking out

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; Finnish fintech Membrane Finance has been granted the FIN-FSA Electronic Money Institution license to build the first regulated EUR-based, full-reserve stablecoin in the EU. EUROe will enable near-instant payments globally for a fraction of the cost of traditional alternatives. The product is excepted to launch in early 2023, and a waitlist is now open. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.*

prthu001

The the Euro Stablecoin is by a Finland based fintech company. They have already got FIN-FSA Electronic Money Institution license – the first in the EU, for issuing fully backed and regulated EURe Stablecoin.

thedarkpampers

I'm deep in Cosmos. I use Kado to on and off ramps. It works with Osmosis, Junoswap and Kujira FIN.

MOON_rwethereyet

Exactly.. and this entity will never accept a blockchain-based "proof of ownership" i fear.. And you can always steal a physical object.. but all we can do is make it harder for thieves to falsify the corresponding documents. Also the car's original manufacturer could mint an NFT on their own BC, for every car/FIN upon production. But again there you have your central entity.

MOON_rwethereyet

But if you think about it, how do we proove our ownership of a car irl? Usually by a (written) contract, including the car's FIN and most countries will also have a registration DB. In a developed country, its hard to falsify those and not get caught.

chivakenevil

This is exactly why you shouldnt be speaking when you know nothing. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWIFT](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWIFT) IN YTD August 2022, SWIFT recorded an average of 44.8 million FIN messages per day

tiktaktok_65

As someone that works in operations for 16 years inside a bank/broker dealer and is using SWIFT in all BAU activity, I totally disagree with your assessment. It kinda shows that you do not work in the industry, because a lot of your statements lack any kind of insight into the complexities and nature of SWIFT or domestic RTGS payment rails. (Read: REALTIME GROSS SETTLEMENT) Not sure where you get delay from the roadmap - SWIFT ISO standard changes always take a long time for implementation simply because it essentially requires the whole financial service industry to adapt to the new standards and ensure compatibility within all their individual systems and amongst all technology vendors. that takes time and is normally a phased approach through all message types. We are are currently all busy implementing CBPR+ with target release date end of this year, which requires us all to be able to at least consume MX formated messages. I think you may be unaware to the complexities involved in adapting the hundreds of different message MT formats to MX, considering that all financial entities generate/consume SWIFT messages in one way or another at some point in their system flow. SWIFT is not just payments, but also security, forex, money market, structured products, swaps, corporate actions, statements, confirmations and SSI and other forms of message types. It's OUR message platform and every message type has hundreds sometimes thousands of different parametrisation options - that complexity is required to fully capture the particularities of all asset types and the respective servicing requirements, which is also market specific. The quality of domestic payment rails varies greatly between countries and regions, obviously the USA lacks behind compared to countries such as Switzerland that are planning to introduce instant payments in August 24 on back of the switch from FIN+ to Scion, wihch is the routing protocol intended to replace BGP and is a path based architecture that comes with a radical improvment to security. SWIFT GPI is essentially a cross-border tracking function that works within the current ISO 15022/20022 SWIFTnet environment and involves regular domestic RTGS payment rails that already support instant payments, rolling that function out to clients is what this is all about. As Switzerland most of them are in process of updating to support realtime/instant payments to clients but obviously with different timelines, that is just the nature of global fragmentation, SWIFT's big function is simply to track the payment status across all domestic payment network providers and their respective correspondent banks. They provide GPI as an industry initiative that pushes for new standards and binds every participant that sign's up to GPI to adhere to the rules. SWIFT GPI is not a magic payment network developed by SWIFT. You are still ignoring one imprortant fact that dominates the financial industry, the lack of resources to make big shifts from legacy systems, because IT has never enough resources or budget available to make fundamental changes - so interoperability is a key requirement in the industry and the reason why its onion shells everywhere, if you seek to capture any kind of business that isn't just "add on" you need to support legacy systems. SWIFT doesn't compete with Ripplenet. If you knew SWIFT and worked with SWIFT, you would understand that. But you don't and it shows. Again SWIFT is more than just payments. SWIFT is totally able to support realtime settlement, not sure where you get your information, SWIFT is a messaging platform. Participants on SWIFT exchange messages that instruct legally binding actions or information. Any participant can capture SWIFT message flow STP into their systems and import them into their systems or execute actions based on that. It's all a question of system architecture and workflows at each SWIFT participant. Most don't do a true STP implementation, because AUDIT requirements within the industry sometimes dictate maker / checker procedures, but that is industry practice that is guided by regulation. SWIFT has nothing to do with counterparty risk - i can send a SWIFT message to any SWIFT participant directly, it's there in seconds, all entities are regulated banks, financial institutions or large corporate clients. We interact directly with each other. there's no intermediary, if you consider a network such as SWIFT being a CP risk, well then this is true with Ripplenet as well. We already have T+0 markets such as China Stock Connect, that settle in realtime and which is a process that SWIFT fully supports. Settlement batches is a practice mainly in securities settlement, which is market specific, payments between domestic banks over domestic RTGS payment rails settle all in realtime. banks tend to effect payments for clients with a delay, for various reasons. anyways, your post is a good example of someone uninformed and lacks the perspective of an insider and your attitude shows one of the core problems in this sub: ignorance.

azidesandamides

Funny how that movie is soooo 1999 and about 20 more people who worked in FIN came out since then and said... yep everything happening is true... I worked for x big bank... all happened..

DrinkMoreCodeMore

Sideshift.ai FIN

Hank___Scorpio

Buy btc and eth. Don't buy shitcoins as any large percentage of your portfolio. Hold for 3 cycles. There. Subreddit FIN. All the people who figured this out back in 2017 have mostly moved on from this sub as there isn't much left to say or read.

ChiTownBob

FIN.....A.....LY! I'm so sick of uphold.

Arcc14

Ya that Luna play I just made was a hassle, BTC > usdc celsius > coinbase > atom > Keplr > osmosis > Luna >terrabridge > anchor > terraswap > anchor FIN 😂 can be a lot of work but soon the apps will have to compete with the likes of CEX’s and DEX’s that are seem-less and fluid

TwoFesticles

Last year Arizona established the Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Study Committee and their initial report was due 12/31/21. (source: [https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/55leg/1R/summary/S.2544FIN.DOCX.htm](https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/55leg/1R/summary/S.2544FIN.DOCX.htm)). Have you seen that report or have a link to it? I find it interesting that this new bill is introduced within a month of the initial report and would love to see what the committee said to prompt this legislation.

frozennorth0

“with money harder to get there will be less money to invest in crypto,” “the market is crashing very intensely.” Nasdaq is not generally considered“the market.” SPX 6% off of all time highs. “*We* can already see people cashing out their stock market gains.” “With the market going down we could see a situation like 2008.” You mean when people began losing their homes, jobs, and large financial institutions were on the brink of collapse? I think today is a little different. This looks like an assignment I turned in to my FIN101 professor freshman year when I tried to pretend to be a seasoned investor and knew everything about market crashes and where the market was headed.

snowkeld

You're absolutely wrong about it having no effect, though you're right about the tax part. Bitcoin is not virtual currency per regulations or IRS code. It is also not foreign currency. https://www.fincen.gov/sites/default/files/shared/FIN-2013-G001.pdf Omg, was going to link to the IRS definition, but they CHANGED IT! It was: https://web.archive.org/web/20210112235053/https://www.irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/virtual-currencies It is now: https://www.irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/virtual-currencies

MeatRack

Optimus also intends to be a cross-chain yield optimizer utilizing BTP. Suspect strategies like that will be voted on with the FIN token after a few months of BTP operating. Will be pretty cool to have it automatically moving around $USDC or $bnUSD to different protocols to maximize stablecoin yields across multiple platforms.

Tonymt881

Let’s not forget that Optimus will be live on ICON in a few weeks, optimizing the yield from Balanced (and later OMM). These are very exciting times for ICON. ICX/BALN/OMM/FIN should gain traction any day now.

nroose

Was looking again at this. This link: [https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BN.FIN.TOTL.CD?most\_recent\_value\_desc=false](https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BN.FIN.TOTL.CD?most_recent_value_desc=false) is dollars. Your link was "LCU", which is local currency. The dollars one looks a little different.

Devilsb5

There’s one hurdle BTC needs to get over. Worldwide acceptance. Right now if you had a case full of $63,000 or someone’s cell phone or laptop, I’m pretty sure most would take the case of fiat. FIN

Brickwater

FIN

CalibanZZ

ICE and FIN airdrops on ICON network in coming months

aesgan

I invested in "Distributed Autonomous Vehicules" DAV ICO. Never delivered, everything shut down. 20k down the drain. I also invested in FIN/NOM ICO, from the owners of Cryptopia (hacked), Tabtrader app for phone and some mining pools. Money disappeared, no accountability. 10k down the drain. gg

blablablablabla78

that guy doesn't even understand that SWIFT is a financial messaging platform and not a fucking payment system, you instruct payment orders that are sent in realtime via FIN MT messaging protocol to local bank correspondent BICs, these then execute domestic or foreign payments on their respective RTGS platforms - the payment details follow market practice standards set by banks and intermediaries, the payment is done based on the details of the payment order. (t+2 is a formal b2b payment cycle) also SWIFT is not only for payment messages but also allows the exchange of authorised messages that bear legal authority comparable to duely signed fax or letters, it provides further message types for FX/Money Market/Standard Settlement Instructions/Cash Instructions/it allows Broadcasts that can be country/region/continental or global (sample OFAC lists)/major part is Security Messages for EQ/FID etc /Corporate Action processing/Statements/Trade Confirmations etc etc. all of that message type content is exchanged based on an international agreed financial message ISO standard in fucking realtime. (essentially SWIFT allows entry/generation of hundreds of different MT messages with hundreds of mandatory and optional data field options that cover all aspects/asset classes of the financial universe) source: working with SWIFT in my day-to-day for a global IB, most of these messages are created and consumed automatically. the delay happens in core banking applications that require exception based or manual handling depending on the sophistication of their respective integration. decade old legacy system landscapes, tight budgets and lack of IT resources is what keeps banking slow and inefficient. also SWIFT can easily integrate crypto message formats if it needs to, probably will be part of the next ISO standard after 20022. in essence: Ripple is no SWIFT competitor, Ripple is a global payment solution that competes with domestic RTGS payment platforms. However claiming Ripple is a SWIFT competitor is fine but misleading marketing. SWIFT also maintains a physical seperated global tier1 backbone that physically connects banks with leased lines to service bureaus(SWIFT certified ASPs). it runs on mpls but may change to scion. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/112017

blablablablabla78

that guy doesn't even understand that swift is a financial messaging platform and not a fucking payment system, you instruct payment orders that are sent in realtime via FIN MT messaging protocol to local bank correspondent bics, these then execute domestic or foreign payment on their respective rtgs platforms - the payment details follow market practice standards set by banks and intermediaries, the payment is done based on the details of the payment order. also swift is not only payment messages but also authorised messaging platform that bears legal authority comparable to duely signed fax or letters, it provides messages for FX/Money Market/Standard Settlement Instructions/Cash Instructions/Broadcasts that can be country/region/continental or global/Security Messages/Corporate Actions/Statements/Trade Confirmations etc etc. all of that message content is exchanged based on an international agreed financial message ISO standard.

Somewhere-Special

XDC Xin FIN

Chesterbobby

Dumbest thing you can do. DONT GIVE FIN ADVICE TO FRIENDS smh

Due_Camel875

Thanks to DOGA THE COIN YAH I CAN FINALLY EAT POR FIN 🙏 ... yah... DOGA coins to the MON

LiberumInfantis

That closing "FIN" was the perfect dramatic flourish.

snowkeld

FIN-2013-G001 is the first document on the stack. Anything else published after and refers to the terms defined in this document are effected, including IRS Notice 2014-21.

wolfpacw

For seven years, trainer of dolphin! Do you have a DORSAL FIN!?! 🤣

clemfandang00

I'd like to make a deposit. Which wallet sir? Uranus plz...... *Unzipping sound. Fades to black... FIN.

RiverRatDoc

I hope you hit that goal. I’ve been in crypto for 8 years, but as the money grew, emergencies came along. (e.g. in June 2017 I was out of town & my car got totaled. Insurance covered a lot, but BTC had a wild upswing during that time & so I cashed out 60% of what I held because I needed the money. // one of my kids is poly medical, so there have been times I have had to pull from my “HODL-ings”.) But I’m rooting & pulling for you. My examples aren’t meant as a pity story, but as an example that crypto can grow your money bettter than any FIN-Institution.

UsefulAd5546

Did someone saw FIN-BEL yesterday? At the end of the match a girl in a tanktop ran on the field and promoted "WTF-coin" a crypto. LOL

KNTXT

Here's a quick list of banks that have been known to close/limit accounts related to crypto transactions: SEB (SWE), Nordea (FIN), Danske (DEN), Swedbank (SWE), Lloyds (UK), HSBC (UK), Bank of Ireland (IRE), AIB (IRE), Permanent TSB (IRE), Westpac (AUS), ANZ (AUS), JPMorgan Chase (US), Wells Fargo (US), Bank of America (US), US Bank (US) Keep in mind that this list was compiled mostly as a result of a quick Google search and some banks may have changed their stances on the issue already. For example, US Bank is actually starting to offer crypto custody services for their clients. However, **my personal opinion is that since these entities didn't support Bitcoin in the past, they do not deserve our support in the future**. They can backtrack all they want, truth is we don't need them. Boycott the motherfuckers is all I'll say.

FusionOfAlloy

Bingbon. No vpn or anything. Check out their Twitter they are legit I have used them a long time. Use my referral link please. https://invite.bingbon.com/CT1FIN

HenryHenderson

I'm looking into FIN at the moment. There are links to Microsoft apparently being shown on Twitter. Are you still bullish on Definer?

Tvmouth

I hope peter doesn't become suicidal when stacks of pieces of paper don't cause other humans to pretend to respect him anymore. If my only power and comprehension of reality was *"big stacks mean people like me!"* then it makes sense that my entire personality and self esteem would be destroyed by stupid little numbers on a phone screen. He's obviously got some weird FIN fetish that requires "money" to be a physical object he can... throw or beat people with...? self flagellation with stacks of quarters or something? Anyway, we're devaluing his sex life. (probably a bubble anyway)