NET

Game3k

$NET will make you rich

WhiteColllarCrime_69

Some of the biggest company’s not (yet) added to the S&P500 1. DDOG 2. APP 3. MU 4. HOOD 5. CRWV 6. SNOW 7. RBLX 8. NET 9. MSTR *Gamble harder hoars*

hellojabroni777

OP should have sold because a NET small loss is better than blowing your whole position. OP will learn the hard way.

Game3k

If you’re not invested in $NET Cloudflare, you will miss the biggest winner of the decade. Cybersecurity market is not going anywhere. If you want to be wealthy, you need to be invested in $NET 🚀

horseflaps

NET, RRI - intend to hold long term. Also hold COIN

Wolvshammy

Again, you called me a pumper. That's a personal attack. Just because I called you something different doesn't mean you didn't call me something. Accountability issue? I've posted multiple iterations of valuations, my guy. I constantly revise and work on the numbers, my guy. My DD is out in the open, my guy. I notice the ONE thing you continue to refuse to do is YOUR valuation, my guy. Do you know what NET debt is, my guy? It means I already accounted for the $236 million in cash, my guy, and I subtracted it from their gross debt, my guy. I didn't say they didn't show signs of healthy debt, my guy, I just highlighted the difference of a company that will shortly have half of their revenue and 98.5% less debt, my guy.

Lost-Replacement-119

In Profit: NVDA, MSFT, NET, PLTR, GOOG, GBTC, META, CRM, RKLB In Loss: UNITY, ASAN

cheddarben

Incidentally, I only own 5 individual stocks and the rest is in total market stuff or appropriate allocations of some sort or another for my age. Also, all of these but one is leftover moonshots I have already exited my original position from. 1. RDDT 600 shares. I owned just over 1400 shares and this is, by far, my biggest individual position. If they can monotize and keep the eyeballs, this has the biggest upside potential. 2. NET - 125 shares - Bought on IPO and sold the bulk of my shares a long time ago. I am just hanging on here and probably not going to sell unless shit starts to look bleak. It isn't bleak. The total return on this right now for what I have left is an eleven banger. Cloudflare has treated me well. 3. NVDA 60 shares - I bought somwhere at 100 and sold what I am going to sell for the time being. This is one of my newer investments. 4. AAPL 25 shares - I sold most of my shares. I am staying in a bit because Apple. 5. DJT 185 shares. sigh. The only one that I am not a big winner on already. I am here because he is corrut as fuck and either it will benefit this stock or I will be in a future class action. If I lose it, I deserve to lose it.

SabertoothWizard27

NET

trent_upscale

Put it all in an ira of VOO shares and lose your password LEAVE THIS SUB IF YOU VALUE YOUR MENTAL HEALTH OR NET WORTH

MoulaMan

NET has already gotten ridiculously overpriced, PLTR-style overpriced.

Game3k

$NET - Cloudflare will make millionaires. The market is vastly underestimated. $NET will 10x in 5 years 🚀

Unhappy-Goat5638

Priced in I bought after it crashed at 181$ Will hold on to these calls for a while I expect NET to go to 250$

Spankynpetey

Inflation never actually goes down. It just slows down. ADP Jobs basically show that small 🚎 ness is contracting and corporate big business continues to grow. The strain on the economy will be felt disproportionately by the small employer, so that makes sense. However, small employers represent a large part of the US economy. The Big Beautiful Bill narrowly passed the Senate, but I doubt in can pass the House, so that’s a moot point. The national debt is an entirely different issue. Wall Street obviously cares, the tax payers who will be paying that debt care and the proposed BBB represents the largest increase in taxation in history dressed up as tariffs. That’s an issue, but this administration is not going to address it. As usual, debt and cost of living increase but this time with a declining dollar and an isolationist administration. Personally, I never believe we were heading for a recession. I do believe the economy will push through but the markets will have periodic adjustments for the NET loss to the US economy. Small local retail is probably not happening under this administration.

cheddarben

If I am trading on a thesis, I go in knowing with at least an idea of what I would expect from it. Here is an example. Beyond Meat. I went in on IPO and I did the due dilligence of looking at the prospectus and looked what THEY were expecting in terms of revenue growth and thought about what they could be doing and market competition. I don't remember what I exactly valued what it would become, but it was far less than the high it hit. I 100% didn't expect it to go dumb up right away, but it did. It went from 66 to 234 in three months. I sold at the dollar value I said I was going to, as I thought that was the max value that I could gotten out of it *had they done everything they said they were going to do*. The only extra could have been market hype. I don't remember where I sold, but it was like 130 or something like that. So, I missed out? I had a banger of a run. Something I thought would play out over a few years happened in months. See, the thing is that the future reveals itself and with every quarter they are either doing what they said they were going to do or not. It is in the financial reports. Had it not jumped up so wildly, I might have sold at a loss. I don't know. I am guessing after a few financials released, I would just take the L and move on. Today, it is 3.45, so I am glad I sold and went on my way. Today, I act a tad differently. I tend to keep a chunk of them if it is a possible moonshot. So, I will make my price and then exit mostly, but keep a bit. This is why I have some NET still (also an IPO buy) and NVDA (I got in pretty late). I bought RDDT pretty hard and now have about 35% of my initial entry. I expect to keep them. My intent was to be long with it, but I doubled with a bit, tripled with a bit, and then quadrupled a bit. What else am I going to invest in? Well, only a fairly small percentage of my portfolio is in individual stocks. When I sell these, the total goes back into the main kitty... mostly total market ETFs and I keep a responsible allocation into bonds for my age. For me, the idea is to preserve what you have. You take chances, but the idea is to make those chances you take be less and less risky to your entire pot.

LeBhikariLe

NET cratering

Elibroftw

Nah I need something that is flat. I sold NET when it was flat and then it took off.

Game3k

Daily reminder to buy cyber, like Cloudflare $NET, which will make investors fortunes. 35% top line growth for $NET and $CRWD $NET will still 2x or 3x from here in the not too distant future

faenor_melkor

first of all , thanks for taking the time I think i get what you say and i agree with that, in this particularly case, it would end up being a nothing burguer (just a few $ up or down) , no way a wipe out event as in the OP, because there were only 2 contracts exercised and (fortunately) i had the cash available for those 2 contracts. "So other than some fees what does it matter if he was assigned 1 option or 100 ??" This i don't understand/I'm not 100% sure it doen't matter: I agree that at the end , the NET liquidation would be + or - few $ (1 or 100 contracts) , but , if i need the cash first, to buy the shares, how it doen't matter 1 (7k usd)or 100 (700k usd) contracts? , i mean , wouldn't the broker would first try to liquidate all my portfolio in order to obtain the maximun ammount of cash possible (also margin calls wouln't take place?) ? If some big possitions (like 70% of account ) of that accout are at a big loss (like SPY shares bought day before liberation day, for example) , the liquidation related to obtain cash for the options assigned , can touch that SPY position and realize losses ("big beautifull trump losses" ) when it will (most historically probable) "cure" themselves by just waiting (new ATHs in future) etc. That's what i mean by possibly wipe out account event. In your experience, do you know if broker would not touch that , "at the moment" lossing positions? Thanks

Game3k

If you’re not in $NET, you hate money Cybersecurity will be the winner of 2025

True-Area99

NET has also been up, and I am pretty sure CRWD is at all time highs

dvdmovie1

"Looking for stocks that can (or starting to) take off and could become big players in the near future." IMO if a growth name isn't up quite nicely in the market that has been the last two months I would question what's wrong with it. Have already started to trim a bit some of the things that are up substantially in a very short period of time, things like NET up more than 100% off the low of less than 3 mo ago and ASTS practically going vertical up 110% in a month. I'd rather wait for better opportunities in some of the better/best growth stories than buy something so-so because it hasn't run up as much. " AI, space, robotics and defence stocks are particularly great nowadays" Industrial stuff like FIX and LMB up a lot this year and over the last 5 years (LMB up 3,700% in the last 5) but nobody buys these things on here because they're not flashy companies. VST/TLN/CEG in utilities. PWR/EME. All this stuff that keeps doing well but nobody seems interested because it looks boring on the surface - yet something like PWR has far outperformed most of the mag 7 over the last 5 years. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries in Japan up a bit over 1,000% in the last 5 years. Even with tech there's barely any discussion of tech on here that's not mega cap tech - NET up a casual 100% off the low with no mention. PLTR had such skepticism and now people are asking about whether it's too late or not. Euro defense is a good theme with the spending that will occur, but Rhinemetall up 264% in the last year and 2,100% over the last 5 years already takes a fair amount of that into account.

dvdmovie1

Not really interested in making any of these large holdings. UBER and NU as smaller holdings, but otherwise no. Some of these I've never heard of. NET I think is a great long-term growth story, but I've been trimming it lately up more than 100% off the low. ASTS is another thing I've been trimming lately, that's up 110% in a month. I think these both still interesting long-term stories but there's a point where I feel like things have gotten ahead of themselves - the RSI on ASTS got to 90 before it started to turn and it's still technically overbought. There's not much I'd buy in general at this point in terms of growth. That doesn't mean that there aren't good long-term stories, but *short-term* someone buying something ASTS in the mid 50's after it's gone basically vertical in a month with a 90ish RSI is chasing out of FOMO. and last one into the investment party is often the first one out when the momentum stops and it starts correcting. Anything growth that hasn't done well in the last month or two with growth stocks soaring, I'd question what's wrong with it. Thematic bets used to play out over a year or two, now anything remotely "hot" turns into a complete pile-on and what one used to expect in a year or two now seems like 6 months or less. High quality problem but at the same time in some of these cases the move becomes so short-term excessive that it is prudent to at least trim the position and now you quickly have to figure out another bet that you hope to get right and/or wait for a better opportunity in something. "First Solar" There is a point where the solar theme will start to be totally given up on and maybe there's a decent bounce there (especially if rates actually do come down) but the fundamental story really isn't very good for the foreseeable future. Maybe eventually things turn for solar again and by that time enough companies have either combined or 0'd that the remainder will be stronger if the fundamental story ever really turns back the other way. ("Solar manufacturing is booming. Advocates say it could go bust without incentives", https://www.npr.org/2025/06/27/nx-s1-5442376/manufacturing-congress-solar-energy-tax-cuts-roll-back) "Globant" I've never gotten the appeal of these tech consulting companies (DAVA, this, Reply in Italy, there's others) and now with AI kind of question the risk of disruption.

AlaskanSnowDragon

> NET options premiums are ($909) You've lost more on your options than you've made What are you talking about. The point again is non of your gains are owed to options. You held underlyings and sold as they went up. The fact you use the ITM options as reasons to sell doesn't negate the fact none of your gains are due to options. Buy, Hold, Sell on way up. Thats your strategy...can remove the options and end up in the same place.

Jacob_Billingsley

Gotcha, yes it has been a choppy market for the first 6 months so I would expect those results. The answer to your question is clearly depicted in the balance details of the description where I said NET options premiums are ($909) and it clearly shows this on the graph.

SweetEffort8250

I only looked at celsius once and it was right before the massive run. I even watch listed options. It hurts to look at. Instead I bought Google calls which still doubled my money so I can't complain. Honestly in my roth I've only ever lost money on a single trade ever and it's webull, currently. I haven't sold so no loss yet but it's my first stock at a loss. I've been destroying SPY. My short term account I just blow up because I'm a degen. But my roth I'm a bitch and only buy shares or very far out calls for good companies. The stock has been insane though, like all of them are 50% up in the past couple months alone. Had a lot of hood, NET, usar, and bunch others I sold during the run up and just been buying webull. It's the most I've been invested in a single company. My 2nd most is sofi then it falls off to next to nothing other than SPY

GoZukkYourself

NKE Just Released Earnings ⚪NIKE Q4 NET INCOME USD 211 MILLION VS. IBES ESTIMATE USD 185.9 MILLION ⚪NIKE Q4 GROSS MARGIN 40.3% ⚪NIKE Q4 GROSS PROFIT USD 4,469 MILLION ⚪NIKE Q4 PRETAX PROFIT USD 318 MILLION VS. IBES ESTIMATE USD 233.5 MILLION ⚪NIKE Q4 REVENUE USD 11,097 MILLION VS. IBES ESTIMATE USD 10,724 MILLION ⚪NIKE Q4 EPS USD 0.14

isospeedrix

NET is absolutely bananas

LtUnsolicitedAdvice

I didn't sell everything but I sold about 50% of my trading account stocks. I kept my NVDA stock through it all. With the free cash I generated income selling options, which worked out decent. My only regret is getting out of NET, it was a stock I had a held for a long time and would have loved to ride the current momentum as well. But no worries a future opportunity will come up. FWIW, my portfolio is exactly where it was on Feb. So everything evened out I suppose.

Game3k

Cybersecurity (not AI) will win the market in 2025. Think about how geopolitical issues will grow the market. 40% rev growth ahead for $NET & $CRWD

roncifert

This is incorrect. PE is not a revenue of multiple. PE is a multiple of NET EARNINGS inclusive of expenses.

WhoLickedMyDumpling

100k loss is netted against $100 gain for $99,900 loss... unless you mean net $100 as in $100k loss against $100,100 gain, in which case yes, on the hook for the $100 NET gain. My point remains, if you're a profitable trader you get taxed less on gains

otherlordchumbucket

AS OF TODAY MY NET WORTH HAS PASSED 100K when i lost my job and started gambling out of desperation i did not expect it to go so well

Sidewaysshiba

Cloudflare $NET

dvdmovie1

In terms of things that are talked about little/not at all on here: CLPT. AUR. XMTR is potentially interesting *if* more industrial production is moved to the US. OUST (interesting example of a current OUST project: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GuHlPhjWoAAs7_U?format=jpg&name=large) PSNL is a tiny name that was thrown out post 2021 bubble that has a considerable partnership with TEM that has been expanded since the start. "Tempus is serving as the exclusive commercial diagnostic partner for Personalis’ ultra-sensitive tumor-informed MRD product, NeXT Personal® Dx, for broad patient adoption in breast and lung cancers, and for immunotherapy monitoring across all solid tumors." NET is up over 100% off the low and 63% YTD and nobody seems to talk about it on here anymore. ABBNY with it potentially spinning off its large robotics division next year.

Maakus

Regulations are loosening on robotaxis which should result in vehicle sales growth. Do I think that will result in 5x NET INCOME TODAY? Absolutely not. Tesla is overpriced. If you are bagholding it is not for robotaxi (of which there is a lot of competition), but for the humanoid robots and Teslas ability to scale manufacturing State-side. This is a play Tesla wont flesh out for another 5 years, and in my opinion, I'm gambling elsewhere. Amazon is making and most importantly, using purpose built robots and using AI to reduce employees internally today. Amazon is well priced and can flip a switch any day and turn off capex and throw oodles of money at stockholders. They can do Tesla's business and so much more and make more money doing it. Google is another opportunity cost option to explore as well, but they are in regulation limbo. Court case aside, Google is returning oodles of money back to shareholders TODAY and tick a few boxes Tesla shareholders are looking for. All of this said - aside from the ASS price, Elon Musk, and not using LIDAR(??) - Tesla is a great company. Robotaxi and FSD is a great product/service and is a game changer, and I personally have used FSD a couple times with no issues.

SonicTheHedgefundH0g

I feel the same way about buying NET at $19 a share on RH, should of freaking YOLO’d it all

Elibroftw

Portfolio: 26% in Google, 4% Air Canada, everything else is < 4%. Google is that much because it's my benchmark for stocks to invest in. My target price is $200+ which yield a 26% annualized return, and since it's a mega-cap I'm comfortable holding that much. Regrets: Selling MMM, NET too soon and all of a quantum computing stock (I still think it's overvalued, but did not expect the market to go so crazy over it). Not buying HOOD last year when it was down 7% that one day. I should've bought META. SBUX was a good play just before the CEO announcement. Would've sold for a bag right after the pop. Some stupid fuck on reddit fear mongered over XP and I sold it even though it would've been a 60% return if I still owned it. I was fucking around in my FHSA and owned TQSM at one point. Absolutely dumb move on my part. Another regret is bying STLA instead of Volkswagon. I drive a Lexus, but Audi's are cool too. Losers: INTC (100% on me), XIFR (yield traps are real lol), HUMA (I believed reddit in thinking FDA approval would be a catalyst, and it turns out to be the opposite LOL). Biases: I still think XIFR (2%) and LAC (3%) will pay out in the long term (5+ years). I'm unsure about what the future holds for HUMA (1%).

Game3k

$NET and $CRWD Cybersecurity will be the winner of 2025. Hacks aren’t going anywhere. $NET $180 to $230 fast 🚀

Game3k

If you’re not bullish on $NET then you hate money. NET going from $180 to $240 in no time

Game3k

If you’re not buying the best cyber names like $NET and $CRWD, you will miss the biggest winners of 2025

Game3k

$NET - Cloudflare is going to make many millionaires over the next few years. Real 35% revenue growth. $NET

Game3k

Remember $NET Cloudflare shares will make you rich. Cybersecurity is going no where.

philphan25

Time to buy NET?

kswissreject

Goddamn it should have sold my NET while I could, anytime prior to now

LegitimateShameHands

What is happening to NET?

caringwolf305

GCP is down not NET

Bullo

Puts on NET

kswissreject

Can NET and AMD not be assholes? Nope?

kswissreject

I went from being sad to not selling NET earlier to being happy to being sad again, goddamn it

kswissreject

Came so close to selling NET at the low premarket, thank god I didn't

kswissreject

Goddamn what happened to NET.

Revfunky

People fear what they don’t know and they don’t know stocks. This sub is named stocks yet you will struggle to find depth on the subject. It’s an echo chamber. I’ve gotten one stock pick off of Reddit in six years. I could list a bunch of stocks. It won’t help without an accompanying strategy. I build portfolios brick by brick starting with a strong foundation we can call the Core Portfolio. Once you have a strong Core you can entertain different strategies and asset classes. You should have an asset allocation juxtaposed with a defined trailing stop. Your simple question isn’t simple if you are doing it right. We know nothing about your tolerance for risk for instance. For the sake of brevity honorable mention goes to BRK.B, EQR. PSHZF, NET. I can reasonably expect these to be in a better position years from now.

robertncm

why does NET dilute shareholder? it's been a 60B cap company already

willengineer4beer

To the layman they can point to a few specific cuts in government spending they pushed through and call it fiscal austerity. Never mind the reduction in revenues and increased spending elsewhere behind the curtain. What does “NET” mean on a balance sheet anyway?

PassiveF1st

NET has been on a fucking tear

smileclickmemories

I like NET. I wish I full ported into it few years ago. but the small position I have is doing really well.

DrBiotechs

That’s not even the actual bull thesis for NET lol.

CompanyCharts

https://preview.redd.it/6kkqx781t65f1.png?width=1497&format=png&auto=webp&s=894a4e51fc4a77aa91bc5179c268b4544f360a69 Actually, not insane. Ill avoid it for lack of EPS history. Revenue Growth (TTM) / Share Latest QoQ: 4.70% Latest 1-Yr Growth: 4.70% Latest 2-Yr CAGR: 5.59% Latest 3-Yr CAGR: 5.68% Latest 4-Yr CAGR: 5.77% Latest 5-Yr CAGR: 5.67% Latest 6-Yr CAGR: 5.99% Latest 7-Yr CAGR: 6.06% Cash Flow From Operating Activities Growth (TTM) / Share Latest QoQ: 17.50% Latest 1-Yr Growth: 17.50% Latest 2-Yr CAGR: 15.06% Latest 3-Yr CAGR: 13.89% Latest 4-Yr CAGR: 11.04% Latest 5-Yr CAGR: 11.42% Latest 6-Yr CAGR: 10.02% Latest 7-Yr CAGR: 10.11% a 15-20 P/S ratio feels justified here. But NET is trading at a 34 currently. RemindMe! 1 year

littlePosh_

> $NET has been quietly building a moat, and when the market wakes up, it’s going to rip faces off This is ChatGPT

GoZukkYourself

AVGO earnings out *BROADCOM 2Q ADJ EPS $1.58, EST. $1.56 *BROADCOM 2Q ADJ. NET REV. $15.00B, EST. $14.96B

Spirit-of-investing

wtf are you talking about?NET is already ATH.

Training_Pay7522

NET is a good company, I also use their services. Bought a shitton when it felt at $40 few years ago and exited at $70 to lose money elsewhere. That being said I think Cloudflare is more or less fairly valued for their relative strength and balance sheet, it will keep raising as its revenue will raise. But I have no confidence betting they will still be there 20 years from now.

HearMeRoar80

Biggest issue with NET is that it does not make money, look at the damn P/E. This is the issue with all CDN companies, they don't make money. All the bells and whistles and AI still needs to be proven, meaning they have to make money, so far they are not making money yet, hence the sky high P/E. NET's P/E is already similar to PLTR but with SLOWER revenue growth and a commoditized business.

NewToTradingStock

Well NET better start making appointments to get in bed with President .

leomeng

They are gonna try to pump NET to $250

kswissreject

I now regret selling some NET @ $178, but I should be happy to have kept 3/4 of it.

yaris205

Should of bough more NET after crwd earnings...i fukn knew it

Piyush4758

The craziest part is not that $NET is building the backbone of the modern internet, it’s that the market still thinks it’s just a fancy CDN. Meanwhile, they’re quietly positioning themselves as the go-to infra layer for real-time AI inference at global scale. If $PLTR is the brain, $NET is the nervous system. Wall Street’s still playing checkers while $NET’s laying fiber-optic chessboards.

Successful-Notice311

I have leaps on MDB & SHOP. Also extremely bullish on NET.

a_shbli

Compared to for example CRWD, CRWV is forecasted to generate $15b revenue triple their estimated $5b 2025 in just 2 years. Market cap current $70b The market cap is almost half of CRWD, while CRWD only generates $3-4b revenue and expected to grow to $5-$6b in 2027 with a market cap of $120b CRWV may be over valued to some but compared to the market leaders it is under valued. NET have a market cap of $60b with a much smaller $1.5-$2b revenue. From the 3 CRWV is the cheapest compared to their projected revenue.

a_shbli

Compared to for example CRWD, CRWV is forecasted to generate $15b revenue triple their estimated $5b 2025 in just 2 years. Market cap current $70b The market cap is almost half of CRWD, while CRWD only generates $3-4b revenue and expected to grow to $5-$6b in 2027 with a market cap of $120b CRWV may be over valued to some but compared to the market leaders it is under valued. NET have a market cap of $60b with a much smaller $1.5-$2b revenue. From the 3 CRWV is the cheapest compared to their projected revenue.

a_shbli

Compared to for example CRWD, CRWV is forecasted to generate $15b revenue triple their estimated $5b 2025 in just 2 years. Market cap current $70b The market cap is almost half of CRWD, while CRWD only generates $3-4b revenue and expected to grow to $5-$6b in 2027 with a market cap of $120b CRWV may be over valued to some but compared to the market leaders it is under valued. NET have a market cap of $60b with a much smaller $1.5-$2b revenue. From the 3 CRWV is the cheapest compared to their projected revenue.

Top-Chip-1532

Always make your own decisions and never blindly follow no one. Quantum, PLTR and NET have been good to me so far.

deffjams09

After foolishly not taking profits from $NET during the February highs, I will happy take my profits here. Thanks Mr Market.

kswissreject

Wow did something right for once by buying back NET CCs at the low. Can't believe it.

SweetEffort8250

Actually destroying the market. After the 2nd big tariff fall i sold a lot of spy and bought individual stocks. HOOD,NET,KTOS,SOFI, USAR. When they ran i periodically sold. 60% in stock gains in just a month basicly. Also after Googles giant fall, that same day I bought 2 calls 3 months out and had 150% and 100% gain on. I sold those recently and bought MTCH calls and a fuck ton of webull stock with some Etsy. Redcat was my worse pick but I'm still up. I question if I should do more individual trading because I'm destroying the market. But it's my roth so I'm a little more of a bitch. My HOOD is up 91% on stock alone in a month and a half. I'm 60% invested in spy and 40% in individual stock. It was like 10-20% of my port in individual, problem is my individual gains is growing so much it's now 40% of my port even with periodic selling

niall_9

Google is at the forefront of AI and has the ability to integrate it into multiple profitable tech products. Advancements in AI will result in advancements in their own products. Google can buy up innovators and competitors. OpenAI doesn’t think it will even see a profit until 2029. It lost over $5B last year on only $3.7B in revenue. Meanwhile Google had over $100B in NET INCOME last year. Whats more likely - the profitable company whose own research was the foundation for the LLMs we see today is able to leverage its large coffers and own AI into its widely profitable and diverse business or a random company will burn billions and “screw” them over eventually.

Quixotus

>CITADEL SECURITIES PROFITS JUMP \~70% TO $1.7B IN 1Q 2025: FT CITADEL SECURITIES REPORTS NET TRADING REV. OF $3.4B IN 1Q: FT $10 of those billions are from me

cutiesarustimes2

CITADEL SECURITIES PROFITS JUMP ~70% TO $1.7B IN 1Q 2025: FT *CITADEL SECURITIES REPORTS NET TRADING REV. OF $3.4B IN 1Q: FT Cages rattling.

bobbybeansss

mine are mostly OTM, simply because ITM is far more expensive and years ago i vowed to only use f around money for myself on options (which isnt a lot) all my puts expire in july, but im gonna roll them into august in june. Shopify 90P, NET 135P, SNOW 150P (bought after earnings), and CRWD 300P but i realllly regret that one now. bought it when crwd was like 400 a share earlier this month

Game3k

Cybersecurity, particularly $CRWD and $NET will be the biggest winners of 2025

VotedOut

Why do you really care about my puts position or lack thereof? I'm just a tiny minnow in this market. If I don't have puts, then it's "I'm not putting my money where my mouth is." If I do have puts, then it's "My opinion is biased and not trustworthy and I'm spreading FUD to make the stock go down." I won't be able to win either way. But for the sake of your curiosity - yes, I do have puts on PLTR. Do you have calls? If you want me to show you my puts, then you show me your calls first. As for PLTR valuation, a premium valuation would be 10-20x price-to-sales, or I'll even say 30x price-to-sales is a premium valuation. But over 90x sales? That's an insane clown valuation. For reference, Cisco stock was 40x sales at its dotcom bubble peak. I don't recall a company ever going above 90x sales or even 80x sales into mega-cap territory (>$200B market cap) like PLTR has. I recall a couple large-cap stocks - SNOW and NET - BRIEFLY touching over 90x price-to-sales in the 2021 clown market peak, and not-too-surprisingly, their stocks are down in the last 4 years since then (despite their companies having grown since then) from price-to-sales multiples falling closer to reality (SNOW now trades at 15.5x P/S and $60B market cap, while NET now trades at 30x P/S and $55B market cap).

bobbybeansss

todays purchases: NET 135P 7/18, BA 165P 8/115

trumpdiego

Might full port NET and call it a day

dvdmovie1

If I had to pick one, NVDA but kinda interesting how little discussion there is of anything tech beyond mega cap tech anymore on here. NET up about 40% YTD, CRWD +30% YTD.

WestBeginning3564

I googled this. Imagine conflating a regional stock that had tanked after a quarterly *loss* with a national blue chip powerhouse with $20B *NET* revenue and a 2% dividend. Ironically Oxford Health was bought by UNH. Which BTW they traded around 50 a share. You must have puts 

Game3k

All green everything by EOD. Market has upward bias. Buy tech stocks $UBER $NET

dvdmovie1

"Google Microsoft Nvidia and meta" That's about 25% of the Nasdaq right there, might as well QQQ. Or if not, I'd pick the one or two of these names you are most confident in and maybe pick a couple others where at least one's a different industry and the other is a growth name that is not such a household name that everyone owns already like most of mega cap tech (which is still mostly lagging the S&P YTD, while things like NET are up nearly 40% YTD - not an endorsement of NET at this point, just illustrating that there's other parts of tech that have worked much better this year than mega cap tech.)

Upinsmoke58

WALMART NET PROFITS IN THE BILLIONS. Dont let these big corps whine about tariffs… bottom line : DO NOT BUY

Illustrious-Jacket68

So you then would be supportive of the current talks about the raising of taxes / new tax rate that the republicans put on the table for people making more than 2MM? What would you propose specifically? I'm talking income tax as if you're going to point at billionaires, they do not have income. so, that's separate from your argument of lower taxes on the wealthy. I'll admit that I make a pretty decent compensation. The TJA reduced one tax and because of the SALT limitation and AMT, it negated and roughly speaking, I pay about the same amount of taxes. If you look at AMT prior to the current tax act, you'll see that AMT added back in the SALT and other deductions. So, if you're saying that the 400-2MM range is getting a tax break, in NET and actual terms, that's not necessarily correct. Spoke with my tax preparer and he said that generally, that was the case for the people in that range.

Bencetown

Did you miss the fact that their net profits went up 30% from 2023 to 2024? I'm SURE they can't afford 1 or 2 billion out of the $15 billion in NET profits last year 🙄

Bencetown

Walmart's NET profits went up over 30% from 2023 to 2024 alone. Over 15 BILLION in NET profits. But won't some ody think of the poooooor multinational corporations 🥺

Red_White_And_Red

5 years ago I was a homeless heroin junkie and now I open two houses, 2 brand new cars, and clear $250k per year NET. It’s not over bro, but stop fuckin gambling!!

Ok_Advantage_8153

You need to be clearer on your though processes here. You made money. You just made less than you would have had you not written that covered call. If the market had stayed flat / risen slightly you'd have "won". It rose a lot so you've "lost". The question now is do you let it get assigned and buy another stock, or do you roll the call to keep it? The question to ask is "Do I want to keep hold of $NET even at the current price"? If yes then roll the call. If no, let it get assigned, take the money and buy something else.

Game3k

Cloudflare $NET growth is crazy. Cybersecurity, not AI, will be the real winner of 2025 $NET 🚀

Game3k

$NET will make you a millionaire

greytoc

The term 'positive delta' simply refers to having a position that is biased to the long side. Ie. if the underlying goes up, the trade is profitable. I don't really have any particular directional opinion about NET. Volatility has gone down slightly - although it is still high relative to long term average - so that's one reason why premiums may seem lower than in the past few weeks. If you are writing option contracts - you tend to be short Vega and short Theta. And you can be either long Delta or short Delta depending on the option trade.

greytoc

The way to think about it - is that this trade is done. So you have to decide on your thesis on NET if you want to have a positive delta position. That's how you decide on what to do next. For example, instead of rolling the calls, you can always just write put contracts which are otm at a higher strike if you think that the stock price will retrace.

ConnectPen8575

We broke up six months ago! Get the NET!