ABC

Obsidianram

No, I referred to MSDNC / CBS / ABC / BBC / RT...ooops, Reuters...correctly.

Professional-Time-50

A lot of people believe we will see a lot lower prices before the main event comes along. Only one side will be right. Its funny because people say all the time to zoom out, we are doing great. Well if you zoom out passed this and last bull market to actually beginning of BTC, there is a very strong argument that we could still be in an ABC correction phase for last bull market. The decline from 68k to 15k could just be a wave A and we could be in a rebound wave B just before we take the last decline phase C, that could take us below any lows we have seen so far. Its not an impossible scenario, that is why the market is so split and so cautious. Its easy to get lost in fear of FOMO, but that does not prove we are in THE bull market yet. I let people believe what they choose to believe and act on those believes and I do the same. We will all get what we deserve in the end.

Monkeyinchief

How exactly do you explain the arrest of John Podesta friend Slade Sohmer, editor in chief, who bragged about debunking Pizza gate? Just for context, he got arrested this month for rapping multiple toddlers and babies. What about ABC reporter James Meek also sentenced this year for owning sadist child porn? I know it is all a coincidence has nothing to do with anything. It is like all US presidents besides Trump, who went either broke into office or with a wealth of 1 or 2 million and ending their time with usually 2 digits in the millions with an income of 400.000...just magically rich as fuck. Sure the government is her to help you. That is why we elect them 😂

aliensmadeus

ABC

EndSmugnorance

The last sentence in the post is quite naive: >Crypto exchanges are still unregulated, insecure pots of money that he — or anyone else — can raid to pay for nuclear weapons. ABC ‘journalists’ trying to ‘boogeyman’ crypto to scare people who are informed.

threeseed

ABC is Australian. You are bringing up US issues.

threeseed

This is from the ABC which is a highly respected, non-partisan news organisation similar to PBS. They aren't in the business of doing hit pieces. And they have no agenda to push about crypto one way or another. Your comment on the other hand is weirdly defensive about crypto. Nothing in life is perfect and crypto absolutely has its issues.

perky2012

A simple way is to split the 24 word passphrase into 3 groups of 8, say groups A,B and C. Then store AB in one location, AC in another, and BC in a third location. You need at least 2 of the 3 locations to recreate ABC.

RedOctobrrr

>Is it really a fork if basically everyone agrees to go ahead with a change? Yes, that's the very definition of a soft fork. There are hard forks and soft forks. The former is what resulted in two Bitcoin Cash coins (ABC and SV) where they did not agree to what needed to change and thus forged its own path, both coins continued. A soft fork is like what happens when Bitcoin adopted SegWit. Everyone agrees with the change, it takes place, and the previous iteration is declared dead because everyone moves forward with the version that changed. I've been around crypto since 2014 and have seen many, many hard and soft forks, so I got a little excited at the chance to explain them.

Upper_Swimmer3336

There will always be those who want to make a dollar quickly, they buy at the bottom and sell or dump when demand is high, it is the ABC of trading, I am not a fan of solana but right now there is a lot of insecurity in the market

Abject-Government-13

NBC Chicago Illinois Phone: +1-800- 245-6397 Website: Link PBS Chicago Illinois Phone: +1-773-583-5000 Phone 2: +1-773-509-5330 Email: Chicagotonight@wttw.com WGN/CLTV Illinois Phone: +1-773-528-2311 Email: wgntvinfo@tribune.com WYCC Illinois Phone: +1-773-224-3300 Email: info@wycc.org CBS New York New York Phone: +1-800-242-6397 Email: news@cbsnewyork.com ABC News New York New York Phone: +1-212-456-7777 Email: iwitness@wabc.com News12 Brooklyn New York Phone: +1-718-861-6818 Email: news12bkln@news12.com KFOR-TV Oklahoma Oklahoma Phone: +1-405-424-4444 Phone 2: +1-405-478-6397 KOCO-TV Oklahoma Oklahoma Phone: +1-405-478-3000 NEWS 9 Oklahoma Oklahoma Phone: +1-405-843-6641 Phone 2: +1-405-841-9956 FOX8 Johnstown PA Pennsylvania Phone: +1-814-266-8088 Phone 2: +1-814-237-2300 Phone 3: +1-814-949-8823 KDKA-TV PA Pennsylvania Phone: +1-412-575-2245 Email: newsdesk@kdka.com WTAJ-TV PA Pennsylvania Phone: +1-814-943-2919 Email: cc@wtajtv.com ABC 8 Texas Texas Phone: +1-214-748-9631 CBS 11 Texas Texas Phone: +1-817-451-1111 Phone 2: +1-817-496-7711 Email: news@ktvt.com FOX 4 Texas Texas Phone: +1-214-720-3155 Phone 2: +1-800-677-5339 Email: kdfw@kdfwfox4.com KPRC Houston Texas Phone: +1-713-222-6397 Phone 2: +1-713-778-4910 NBC 5 Texas Texas Phone: +1-800-232-5927 Phone 2: +1-800-654-5927 KING 5 Seattle Washington Phone: +1-206-448-5555 Email: newstips@king5.com KOMO 4 News Seattle Washington Phone: +1-206-404-4145 Email: tips@komo4news.com Q13 FOX Seattle Washington Phone: +1-206-674-1313 Email: tips@q13fox.com CBS 3 Wisconsin Wisconsin Phone: +1-608-273-3333 Email: c3knews@channel3000.com Email 2: rblum@wisctv.com Email 3: tips@channel3000.com CBS 58 Milwaukee Wisconsin Phone: +1-414-777-5800 Phone 2: +1-414-607-8140 FOX 6 News Milwaukee Wisconsin Phone: +1-414-214-3696 MPTV Milwaukee Wisconsin Phone: +1-414-271-1036 NBC 15 Wisconsin Wisconsin Phone: +1-608-274-1500 TMJ4 Milwaukee Wisconsin Phone: +1-414-963-4444 WISN Milwaukee Wisconsin Phone: +1-414-937-3331 Phone 2: +1-414-937-3187 Email: NewsTips@wisn.com WKOW 27 Wisconsin Wisconsin Phone: +1-608-274-1234 Phone 2: +1-608-273-2727 Email: jradske@wkow.com Email 2: news@wkow.com WMSN-TV FOX 47 Wisconsin Wisconsin Phone: +1-608-277-5189 Email: feedback@fox47.com

Abject-Government-13

Special Report With Bret Baier National / International Email: special@foxnews.com The O’Reilly Factor National / International Email: oreilly@foxnews.com Voice Of America National / International Website: Link Email: mail@vidia.org Washington Post National / International Phone: +1-202-334-7410 Email: national@washpost.com Email 2: foreign@washpost.com Washington Times National / International Phone: +1-202-636-3000 Phone 2: +1-202-636-4895 White House National / International Phone: +1-202-456-1111 Website: Link ABC San Francisco California Website: Link CBS San Fancisco California Website: Link NBC Bay Area California Website: Link KTVU Oakland California Website: Link ABC News District of Columbia Phone: +1-202-456-7777 Phone 2: +1-703-236-9555 Website: Link CBS WUSA9 District of Columbia Phone: +1-202-895-5999 Website: Link Email: wusa-assignmentdesk@wusa9.com Fox 5 DC District of Columbia Phone: +1-202-895-3000 Website: Link Email: fox5tips@wttg.com NBC 4 Washington District of Columbia Phone: +1-202-885-4111 Website: Link Email: tips@nbcwashington.com Reuters District of Columbia Phone: +1-202-898-8345 Email: tim.ryan@thomsonreuters.com Washington Post District of Columbia Phone: +1-202-334-7300 Email: metro@washpost.com ABC Chicago Illinois Phone: +1-312-750-7070 Email: WLS-TV.website@abc.com CBS Chicago Illinois Phone: +1-312-899-2200 Email: tips@cbsChicago.com FOX Chicago Illinois Phone: +1-312-565-5533 Website: Link

Abject-Government-13

NAME REGION CONTACT INFORMATION 20/20 National / International Website: Link 48 Hours Mystery National / International Email: 48hours@cbsnews.com 60 Minutes National / International Email: 60m@cbsnews.com ABC News National / International Phone: +1-212-456-7000 Phone 2: +1-212-456-7777 Website: Link Al Jazeera America National / International Email: america@aljazeera.net Email 2: ajam.press@aljazeera.net Associated Press National / International Phone: +1-212-621-1500 Phone 2: +1-202-776-9400 Email: info@ap.org BBC National / International Phone: +44-020-7743-8000 Website: Link BBC America National / International Phone: +1-212-705-9300 Website: Link Email: bbcworld@bbc.co.uk BBC Broadcasting House National / International Website: Link CBS Evening News National / International Email: evening@cbsnews.com CBS News National / International Phone: +1-212-975-4321 Website: Link Channel 4 National / International Email: news@channel4.com CNBC National / International Phone: +1-201-735-2622 Email: info@cnbc.com CNN National / International Phone: +1-404-827-1500 Text Message: 55333 Website: Link Twitter: u/TeamCNN Dateline NBC National / International Email: dateline@nbcuni.com Dateline NBC National / International Email: dateline@nbcuni.com Face The Nation National / International Email: facethenation@cbsnews.com Fox News Channel National / International Phone: +1-888-369-4762 Phone 2: +1-212-301-3000 Email: foxnewstips@foxnews.com Email 2: newsmanager@foxnews.com Twitter: u/foxnews Fox Report With Shep Smith National / International Email: foxreport@foxnews.com

002_timmy

This is the same reason people get wrecked on penny-stocks. Simply put, it's super risky to trade in an illiquid market because even if you're right about the price movement, you may not actually realize any of the gains. Put another way, let's say you decide to buy 100 shares of $ABC @ $50. Once you buy, a everyone pulls their sell orders. People also pull their buy orders. You set a sell order of 100 shares @ $100. One share sells. Now, the stock is priced at $100. You doubled your money. However, nobody else wants to buy your shares. You've spent $50,000, you've sold $100. you're still out $49,900. Now, future trading is just like that, except you're charged .25% of your portfolio value every day. Eventually, your portfolio shrinks so much that you need to liquidate your position. Effectively, you've lost $49,900 because you decided to trade an asset that doesn't have liquidity.

MinervaBlade89

No, it’s not. There’s virtually no reason for the company to know, especially not bitcoin. If OP owned a specific crypto that was being developed by a company, like ABC coin developed by ABC co. Then there could be a legitimate reason, but for an audit that should be handled on a case by case basis.

tenor_tymir

Hm, this is weird since the video in the BitBox App has it right as i would expect it to look like. That’s what got me confused since the device itself does not show it that way. ABC - i expect upper case letters abc - i expect lower case letters 123 - i expect numbers That’s how it’s shown inside the App.

tenor_tymir

Hey Dev! Nice meeting you. My BitBox02 device gives me the wrong headlines when selecting letters. Like in the middle it says “ABC“ but i can only choose numbers. When i swipe to number selection I see “abc” as the headline… and “123” gives me lower case letters… it’s switched up, but operational. Any fix coming up for that? I can send screenshots if necessary

Individual2020

Unfortunately, real state power was lost after the Civil War and the early 1900s just before WWI when they passed the 17th Amendment basically decoupling the Senate from the direct control by state legislatures. The states holding out on bitcoin still can create noise in Congress but in the end it’s all just grandstanding. The ABC agencies in the Executive Branch have all the real power today no matter who is elected as president.

lbuprofenAddict

Or the LOMNP now you know your ABC’s next time won’t you sing with me

Comicaz3

There used to be a point in time where I had cash in my wallet, but I’m at the point now where my currency lives on a plastic card. And probably one day, I’ll be using XYZ vendor’s product to pay for a coffee with ABC crypto

BreadnPaper

I'm confused about what you're saying. We make an agreement/contract. The contract mentions my contract ABC is transferring $5000 to contract DEF (yours). I send the funds through the blockchain in Bitcoin for example. The transaction is literally there on the blockchain forever.

geekbread

Amazing how the SEC, DEA, CIA, NSA, TSA, ABC, HBO, NBA, MLB, POV, BBW, and PAWG all want a part of crypto

CointestMod

#Bitcoin Cash Con-Arguments Below is a Bitcoin Cash con-argument written by Blendzi0r. > # What is Bitcoin Cash (BCH)? > > Bitcoin Cash is a [hard fork](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/h/hard-fork.asp) of Bitcoin. It was launched in 2017. [It has 32MB blocks instead of Bitcoin’s 1MB](https://www.coindesk.com/learn/2015/08/21/what-is-the-bitcoin-block-size-debate-and-why-does-it-matter/), so it can handle many more transactions per second (TPS). And that’s the main difference between BTC and BCH, as its goal was to tackle [Bitcoin’s scalability problem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitcoin_scalability_problem) without the second layer solutions. > > # What are the cons of BCH? > > **IT’S CENTRALIZED** > > BCH “inherited” BTC’s supply distribution from July 2017 when it was launched but the supply held by large addresses [has become more concentrated over time](https://coinmetrics.substack.com/p/coin-metrics-state-of-the-network-2d3) (while BTC is even more decentralized today). > > In 2019, [just two mining pools were able to perform a 51% attack](https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2019/05/24/bitcoin-cash-miners-undo-attackers-transactions-with-51-attack/). And although it was done for a good cause – to stop an unknown miner from exploiting a bug – it can serve as a prove that BCH was centralized already back then. > > ​ > > **THE NARRATIVE IS ON BITCOIN’S SIDE** > > The value of Bitcoin has gone up more than 2,000% since July 2017 while BCH has stayed below its price from July 2017 most of the time, not to mention its [ATH price of $4,355](https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcoin-cash/) (it's 86% down from ATH as of 31.10.2021). > > Also liquidity and real-world usability of Bitcoin Cash [is nowhere near that of Bitcoin](https://www.investopedia.com/tech/bitcoin-vs-bitcoin-cash-whats-difference/#citation-4). It is clear that the great majority of investors chose Bitcoin after the 2017 hard fork and BCH is seen as an inferior copy. > > ​ > > **IT HAD ITS OWN HARD FORKS** > > People cringe at Internet Computer’s name, but for me, Bitcoin Satoshi Vision (BSV) takes the cake. It’s a hard fork of Bitcoin Cash that took place in late 2018. It has even larger blocks than BCH – [2GB](https://finance.yahoo.com/news/world-record-2-gigabyte-block-130000498.html). > > In 2020, there was another hard fork that produced two new chains- Bitcoin Cash ABC and Bitcoin Node. This shows that Bitcoin Cash has failed not only against Bitcoin, but had splits among its own community, further hurting its credibility. > > ​ > > **IT'S SCALABILITY COMES AT A COST** > > Bigger blocks have certain [disadvantages](https://www.sfox.com/blog/is-bigger-better-how-to-evaluate-bitcoin-cash-based-on-block-size/). Running nodes when the blocks are big requires more resources. Also, the commissions from transaction fees are lower, which makes mining the coin less appealing. This might result in nodes being manageable only by big, private companies, making BCH even more centralized. > > ​ > > **ITS MAIN ADVANTAGE ISN’T UTILIZED…** > > Although BCH’s blocks can handle up to 32MB of data, [they have not reached even 2MB since they were introduced in 2018](https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/size-btc-bch.html#3y). What's more, their average size is currently much lower than that of Bitcoin’s blocks. > > Taking into consideration the point above about the disadvantages of bigger blocks, it makes you wonder why BCH would push for such big blocks when most of the time they don't even use 3% of their capacity. > > ​ > > **… AND EVEN IF IT WAS, THERE'S LIGHTNING NETWORK** > > [SegWit](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/segwit-segregated-witness.asp) allows second layer solutions to be implemented on Bitcoin. One of those solutions is Lightning Network which has become very popular recently after being [adopted by El Salvador](https://bitcoinmagazine.com/markets/lightning-network-bitcoin-usage-adoption-el-salvador) and [Twitter](https://www.theblockcrypto.com/post/118450/twitter-rolls-out-bitcoin-tipping-for-ios-users-via-lightning-looks-to-nfts-for-the-future). > > Lightning Network effectively eliminates the main advantage of Bitcoin Cash by allowing faster and cheaper transactions with bitcoins. Even if BCH fully utilized its 32MB blocks, it wouldn't be able to compete with Lightening Network. > > \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ > > **SUMMARY** > > Bitcoin Cash is a much worse store of value than Bitcoin and now it is also losing the electronic cash narrative, since the growing adoption of [Lightning Network](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightning_Network) makes Bitcoin a much cheaper and faster payment option. ***** Would you like to learn more? Check out the [Cointest archive](/r/CointestOfficial/wiki/cointest_archive#wiki_Bitcoin_Cash) to find submissions for other topics.

Potatotornado20

My biggest fear is: 1) On Apr 2024 halving date, Bitcoin has made a lower low, breaking under $15.5k, 2) then for the next 18 months Bitcoin has to fight its way back up and only gets to an ATH of $40-50k and is rejected, 3) then in the subsequent 2026-28 bear market, Bitcoin crashes all the way down to $3k. That scenario would look exactly like an Elliot wave supercycle, with 3 peaks to the top (the prev 3 cycle peaks), followed by a crashing ABC structure (the upcoming 2024-28 cycle that never gets back to ATH).

MrMogz

Good info! At the end of the day what Reddit did, is how normal folks can use/adopt crypto. They don’t care about all the intricacies, if it works and is better than the alternative, they’ll use it, but it has to be “as easy as ABC” and we’re not there yet, for the overall market.

slug_tamer

Ah true it's on the government funded TV channel here in Aus so free to stream. If you have a VPN you could try the ABC iview. Great show!

1011010110102

what about ledger or trezor who have the words pre-loaded onto the devices. What would stop them from keeping a database of what words are loaded onto wallet "ABC".... i never could understand why people can't just make up their own 24 words. Am i missing something here?

Silence-Samurai8357

13 years ago I was learning ABC's

Plus-Ad4019

>In your above example, if Wallet ABC has 50 UTXOs of .02 in it, can ABC send to ABC all 50 UTXOs and it'll have an output of 1 UTXO? The protocol allows it and that's indeed the outcome, but your specific wallet might warn you against (or even prevent you from) sending such a transaction.

piercena15

Just to clarify, can you send to the same address you are sending from? In your above example, if Wallet ABC has 50 UTXOs of .02 in it, can ABC send to ABC all 50 UTXOs and it'll have an output of 1 UTXO?

ProudBitcoiner

I would like you to talk more about the coin ABC, I haven't heard a good bull market story for a while. :D

FattestLion

That’s like hearing: Coin ABC went up 69,420% !! But it’s not in your portfolio

igadjeed

It's easier to airdrop and pump-and-dump by making a token on a smart chain Forking a PoW blockchain only works if there are miners willing to adopt the new coin. Several of these have happened, but are mostly ignored by the market and by miners. There's even a fairly recent PoS fork of Bitcoin Probably the most recent noticeable chain fork was the split of BCash into BCHA and BCHN. The ABC developer group wanted to levy a 25% tax on mining rewards, to fund development. This tax was overwhelmingly rejected by the BCash community, but went ahead anyway. BCHA is the fork with the tax. BCHN is BCH, with community support Acrimony with the BSV community has created numerous forks. Nobody keeps track of them

AD1AD

BCH has slowly been weeding out the crazies and wannabe dictators who show up to fill the "power vacuum" in a decentralized currency. Ironically, the next split BCH had was when one of the founding dev teams (Bitcoin ABC) was kicked to the curb for trying to impose a development tax.

Olskoolah

Not trusting this green. DXY straight up, NASDAQ futures down. B wave of an ABC correction

superberde

According to an ABC News (AU) article

igadjeed

> they did so because they weren't happy with the controversial Segwit update How you love to rewrite history Nobody in the bigger block camp hated SegWit until after the New York Group's own SegWit hard fork failed to launch BCash didn't have SegWit because its developers (the ABC group) based their larger block version of Bitcoin on a pre-SegWit base, not because they disagreed with SegWit SegWit was never controversial until months after it launched, after the SegWit2X project collapsed. The controversy was that even though they supported SegWit, some miner pools refused to signal their support in their block headers because they chose to abuse the block signaling mechanism as a way to force a debate on bigger blocks. In August 2017, they signaled for SegWit because their blocking maneuver was outmaneuvered Three months later the big block proponents claimed to be anti-SegWit, because when their SegWit2X fork failed they chose to advocate for BCash, which didn't have SegWit for the reason already mentioned. Their SegWit opposition was fake, still is fake The more interesting fork occurred when the ABC developers published an update which paid 25% of mining rewards to a developer fund. The BCash community rejected this update. Both BCH-ABC and BCH-node forks still persist

Designer_Restaurant1

I have some money in $ABC, I was going to tell my wife then I saw this post. Thanks OP

TXTHEMXXN

Hype = dolla dolla bills. If you buy ABC123 coin, then make a bunch of bs hype articles and advertise the cheese out of em, you walk away holding the bag. Rinse and repeat

SoSohso

Trust me, don't tell anyone. They ask how much of ABC do you have have you made money (worst question to thise who got in 2020, near the crash if u didn't take enough profit) try to tell you its a scam with incorrect information (then you have to spend 10 minuites answering a question that has the same answer as the next question they're going to ask). Say "Wow it went from 30k to 17k" to show that you lost a lot of money. Trust I've had all these experiences. Don't tell anyone about your crypto, if they want to let them understand crypto in their own way, whether they trade, invest, or use it As a medium of exchange.

bonsai-walrus

I recommend to read The Glacier Protocol (https://glacierprotocol.org/) at least once, even if you're not going to implement it. It walks you through all sorts of scenarios of loss, theft and extortion of private keys. What's important is to not have a single point of failure. Multi-Sig, like the Glacier Protocol, is one way to achieve that. Although I would use Electrum on Tails instead of Bitcoin Core, simply because it's more convenient. Other than that, the Glacier Protocol remains intact. Or you split the seed into parts to get redundancy. For example, you can get a Trezor One (https://trezor.io/) hardware wallet. It generates 24 word seeds. Let the Trezor generate such a seed. Write down the first 10 words on a piece of paper. Factory reset the Trezor and let it generate some other 24 word seed. Write it down on another piece of paper. Use the 1st 10 words you generated as a passphrase. This changes the whole key-set you're going to use. Be sure what the passphrase is. There is no checksum or anything. Every passphrase is valid, but every passphrase gives you a different set of keys. Now you can take another 3 pieces of paper. On paper A write: Words 1-24 of the seed. Paper B: Words 1-12 of the seed, plus the 10 words of the passphrase. Paper C: Words 13-24 of the seed, plus the 10 words of the passphrase. So you have a scheme of 3 parts, ABC and you've split it up into AB- A-C and -CA. Now put the 3 different parts into temper proof envelopes and store each at a different secure location. You can store the Trezor itself with part "AB-", because it has the 24 seed words on its internal memory, but the passphrase (the 10 words). Burn the pieces of paper you're not using. Periodically check the 3 locations, like every 6 months or so. See if the paper backups are still legible. If one part is illegible, reconstruct it from the other 2 parts. If one is missing entirely or you're suspecting someone might have had access to it, create a new wallet like before and transfer all the funds to it.

Sad-Struggle7797

[Pay-to-Pray Scam: Christian Prayer Center ABC NEWS](https://abcnews.go.com/US/owner-pay-pray-website-ordered-return-78m-consumers/story?id=37728398)

Arcosim

>and you'll have to sing the ABC song. That's not dystopian enough. What about having to sign some brand's jingle as some kind of ultra invasive marketing campaign?

KingThermos

Did the ABC song end in Zed or Zee though? So many people going to get this wrong and get locked out.

Kindly-Wolf6919

Next they'll use voice recognition crypto and you'll have to sing the ABC song. Unfortunately, many people will fail this one.

DrvKrv

The guy went from ABC to XYZ. I don't know if that's bullish or bearish.

green_man_69

There are crypto sponsors on every UFC event on ESPN/ABC.

badfishbeefcake

SBF has a fucking brother now???? This ABC soap opera is just being written by itself.

Giga79

They will expire using negative rates. Just how your purchasing power expires today via inflation, but.. combined with inflation. Foreign or used cars could come with a 50% tax to reduce their demand. Advertised to handle today's global chip shortage/climate problem without crashing the wider economy. Prices would remain steady or deflate. Inflation would appear very low if they could only remove auto from the data today. 2% inflation is their goal not how many people can drive to work. Maybe a tax only to you specifically because you are buying an excessive amount of cars, more than 1 per household. CBDCs aim is to prevent economic volitility.... The only reason there's ever been volitility is because *it is fun* to twist the make it rain money knob and everybody is happy with you, because the fallout won't be for 5-10 years, and nobody can be or wants to be that guy to put it to an end so it persists until a full on rager where people are selling fart jpgs making millions of dollars. Money printers going Brrr is human nature at this point. Only it will be brrrr to XYZ investments that are ESG compliant that the politicians have all invested into while there's a massive recession in ABC and in your business because of some arbirary tax imposed - but damn the data will look GREAT.

Giga79

BTC, ETH, and LTC Mainstream is opening up to LTC now. I'm not sure they'll learn what an [ABC] is for a while yet.

BlazeDemBeatz

BlackRock and Vanguard are two of the Big Three (every industry is clumping) passive fund asset management firms. The third, State Street, is owned by BlackRock. Whose largest shareholder is Vanguard. Together, BlackRock and Vanguard own: • Eighteen percent of Fox. • Sixteen percent of CBS, and therefore also of Sixty Minutes. • Thirteen percent of Comcast, which owns NBC, MSNBC, CNBC, and the Sky media group. • Twelve percent of CNN. • Twelve percent of Disney, which owns ABC and FiveThirtyEight. • Between ten and fourteen percent of Gannett, which owns more than 250 Gannett daily newspapers plus USA Today. • Ten percent of the Sinclair local television news, which controls seventy-two percent of U.S. households’ local TV. • A large unspecified chunk of Graham Media Group, which owns Slate and Foreign Policy.

MinimumComment7553

School taught him "ABC" now he teaches "BTC"

MinimumComment7553

School taught me "ABC" now I teach "BTC"

1nsider1nfo

Paper wallet with public and private keys PubAddress: 1David2wTTzW2pgRjBs5WAVTw8zoXmPpVF Priv (WIF): p2pkh:Kwj28i8sZSECYLttZGJL7duj4nz4Q1ToNVyXhNnvFRW1yfv9isd2 Priv (HEX): 0xF13F14B30DF239ABC113977240ABB6538B84B11ABD6CC6DD4C939F35BECEAE5

rjm101

Take the 24 word seed. Each slab contains 6 words and is labelled from A to D. In each location contains one of the 3 groups: ABC BCD DCA If you lose a slab from 1 location you still have the ABCD combination effectively making it 2 of 3.

Silence-Samurai8357

Life was fun in 2009 Learning ABC's Sleeping in class

Designer_Restaurant1

Creating a token is as easy as ABC. It's getting people to buy it that is a lot of work. Hence why I laugh when I see people saying "just make a token, rug people and get rich"

Digi_Ammaz

Exactly! Also, this community shouldnt be posting generals news or analysis all the time. There are people who do not want to know what the finance minister of USA has to about crypto today, there are newbies who joined this sub to learn the basic ABC and some even do not know how to purchase their first bag because neither they can post here, nor their are posts made for them.

information-zone

\> This should be your first red flag. Getting a real rate of return for taking zero risk and contributing nothing to the economy is a pretty fantastical thing to think can happen. To be clear, the reason I put utopia in quotes was because I wanted to call out that I do not believe this is utopia, but that it would be better than the dystopia in which we currently find ourselves. But the real point I have in quoting your reply is: I am not advocating getting a real rate of return for taking zero risk or contributing nothing. I am advocating getting a real rate of return for having provided more value than you consumed. To my mind, it is similar to sitting in the shade of a tree that you planted a decade ago. You did work, without reward, and later on you reap the benefits. If you produce X amount of value today and you only consume (X - 2) amount of value, does it make sense that tomorrow you should only have 1 amount of value? In my mind, the answer is a clear no. And that extra unit of value, where did it go? It went wherever the people who inflate the currency directed it. Those recipients are the ones who obtain a real rate of return for taking zero risk and contributing nothing to the economy. \> Say your economy is comprised of three people A, B and C ... Real production declines because people’s desire to save money has a negative feedback loop into the economy. I am OK with less economic activity, with less production. I don't see any problem spiraling down until some floor of economic activity is found. In your ABC economy, assuming A,B,C produce firewood, fish, fresh water (respectively), I am certain there would \*never\* be zero economic activity. Less, but not zero. \> Think about debt and creditors in a fixed money supply economy. ... now there are 101 dollars total in the system, which is logically impossible Obviously the use of debt would need to change. Funding for new businesses would come out of savings. Houses would be purchased with savings. All of that means, people would produce value and they they would consume value, rather than consume value and "run out the clock" until the value they need to repay is far lower than the value they consumed. \> Economies are inherently unstable \> Money is fundamentally flawed These points we agree on. \> you actually have to walk through the whole process, Here is where we disagree. It sounds to me (from your example economies) like you'd be unhappy if economic activity cratered.

CointestMod

#Bitcoin Cash Con-Arguments Below is a Bitcoin Cash con-argument written by Blendzi0r. > # What is Bitcoin Cash (BCH)? > > Bitcoin Cash is a [hard fork](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/h/hard-fork.asp) of Bitcoin. It was launched in 2017. [It has 32MB blocks instead of Bitcoin’s 1MB](https://www.coindesk.com/learn/2015/08/21/what-is-the-bitcoin-block-size-debate-and-why-does-it-matter/), so it can handle many more transactions per second (TPS). And that’s the main difference between BTC and BCH, as its goal was to tackle [Bitcoin’s scalability problem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitcoin_scalability_problem) without the second layer solutions. > > # What are the cons of BCH? > > **IT’S CENTRALIZED** > > BCH “inherited” BTC’s supply distribution from July 2017 when it was launched but the supply held by large addresses [has become more concentrated over time](https://coinmetrics.substack.com/p/coin-metrics-state-of-the-network-2d3) (while BTC is even more decentralized today). > > In 2019, [just two mining pools were able to perform a 51% attack](https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2019/05/24/bitcoin-cash-miners-undo-attackers-transactions-with-51-attack/). And although it was done for a good cause – to stop an unknown miner from exploiting a bug – it can serve as a prove that BCH was centralized already back then. > > ​ > > **THE NARRATIVE IS ON BITCOIN’S SIDE** > > The value of Bitcoin has gone up more than 2,000% since July 2017 while BCH has stayed below its price from July 2017 most of the time, not to mention its [ATH price of $4,355](https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcoin-cash/) (it's 86% down from ATH as of 31.10.2021). > > Also liquidity and real-world usability of Bitcoin Cash [is nowhere near that of Bitcoin](https://www.investopedia.com/tech/bitcoin-vs-bitcoin-cash-whats-difference/#citation-4). It is clear that the great majority of investors chose Bitcoin after the 2017 hard fork and BCH is seen as an inferior copy. > > ​ > > **IT HAD ITS OWN HARD FORKS** > > People cringe at Internet Computer’s name, but for me, Bitcoin Satoshi Vision (BSV) takes the cake. It’s a hard fork of Bitcoin Cash that took place in late 2018. It has even larger blocks than BCH – [2GB](https://finance.yahoo.com/news/world-record-2-gigabyte-block-130000498.html). > > In 2020, there was another hard fork that produced two new chains- Bitcoin Cash ABC and Bitcoin Node. This shows that Bitcoin Cash has failed not only against Bitcoin, but had splits among its own community, further hurting its credibility. > > ​ > > **IT'S SCALABILITY COMES AT A COST** > > Bigger blocks have certain [disadvantages](https://www.sfox.com/blog/is-bigger-better-how-to-evaluate-bitcoin-cash-based-on-block-size/). Running nodes when the blocks are big requires more resources. Also, the commissions from transaction fees are lower, which makes mining the coin less appealing. This might result in nodes being manageable only by big, private companies, making BCH even more centralized. > > ​ > > **ITS MAIN ADVANTAGE ISN’T UTILIZED…** > > Although BCH’s blocks can handle up to 32MB of data, [they have not reached even 2MB since they were introduced in 2018](https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/size-btc-bch.html#3y). What's more, their average size is currently much lower than that of Bitcoin’s blocks. > > Taking into consideration the point above about the disadvantages of bigger blocks, it makes you wonder why BCH would push for such big blocks when most of the time they don't even use 3% of their capacity. > > ​ > > **… AND EVEN IF IT WAS, THERE'S LIGHTNING NETWORK** > > [SegWit](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/segwit-segregated-witness.asp) allows second layer solutions to be implemented on Bitcoin. One of those solutions is Lightning Network which has become very popular recently after being [adopted by El Salvador](https://bitcoinmagazine.com/markets/lightning-network-bitcoin-usage-adoption-el-salvador) and [Twitter](https://www.theblockcrypto.com/post/118450/twitter-rolls-out-bitcoin-tipping-for-ios-users-via-lightning-looks-to-nfts-for-the-future). > > Lightning Network effectively eliminates the main advantage of Bitcoin Cash by allowing faster and cheaper transactions with bitcoins. Even if BCH fully utilized its 32MB blocks, it wouldn't be able to compete with Lightening Network. > > \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ > > **SUMMARY** > > Bitcoin Cash is a much worse store of value than Bitcoin and now it is also losing the electronic cash narrative, since the growing adoption of [Lightning Network](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightning_Network) makes Bitcoin a much cheaper and faster payment option. ***** Would you like to learn more? Check out the [Cointest archive](/r/CointestOfficial/wiki/cointest_archive#wiki_Bitcoin_Cash) to find submissions for other topics.

Leithm

I started buying bitcoin the day I heard of it in March 2013 my bags are fine thanks. I you think a bug in ABC implementation is the same as a 51% attack than you really don't know what one is.

CointestMod

#Bitcoin Cash Con-Arguments Below is a Bitcoin Cash con-argument written by Blendzi0r. > # What is Bitcoin Cash (BCH)? > > Bitcoin Cash is a [hard fork](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/h/hard-fork.asp) of Bitcoin. It was launched in 2017. [It has 32MB blocks instead of Bitcoin’s 1MB](https://www.coindesk.com/learn/2015/08/21/what-is-the-bitcoin-block-size-debate-and-why-does-it-matter/), so it can handle many more transactions per second (TPS). And that’s the main difference between BTC and BCH, as its goal was to tackle [Bitcoin’s scalability problem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitcoin_scalability_problem) without the second layer solutions. > > # What are the cons of BCH? > > **IT’S CENTRALIZED** > > BCH “inherited” BTC’s supply distribution from July 2017 when it was launched but the supply held by large addresses [has become more concentrated over time](https://coinmetrics.substack.com/p/coin-metrics-state-of-the-network-2d3) (while BTC is even more decentralized today). > > In 2019, [just two mining pools were able to perform a 51% attack](https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2019/05/24/bitcoin-cash-miners-undo-attackers-transactions-with-51-attack/). And although it was done for a good cause – to stop an unknown miner from exploiting a bug – it can serve as a prove that BCH was centralized already back then. > > ​ > > **THE NARRATIVE IS ON BITCOIN’S SIDE** > > The value of Bitcoin has gone up more than 2,000% since July 2017 while BCH has stayed below its price from July 2017 most of the time, not to mention its [ATH price of $4,355](https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcoin-cash/) (it's 86% down from ATH as of 31.10.2021). > > Also liquidity and real-world usability of Bitcoin Cash [is nowhere near that of Bitcoin](https://www.investopedia.com/tech/bitcoin-vs-bitcoin-cash-whats-difference/#citation-4). It is clear that the great majority of investors chose Bitcoin after the 2017 hard fork and BCH is seen as an inferior copy. > > ​ > > **IT HAD ITS OWN HARD FORKS** > > People cringe at Internet Computer’s name, but for me, Bitcoin Satoshi Vision (BSV) takes the cake. It’s a hard fork of Bitcoin Cash that took place in late 2018. It has even larger blocks than BCH – [2GB](https://finance.yahoo.com/news/world-record-2-gigabyte-block-130000498.html). > > In 2020, there was another hard fork that produced two new chains- Bitcoin Cash ABC and Bitcoin Node. This shows that Bitcoin Cash has failed not only against Bitcoin, but had splits among its own community, further hurting its credibility. > > ​ > > **IT'S SCALABILITY COMES AT A COST** > > Bigger blocks have certain [disadvantages](https://www.sfox.com/blog/is-bigger-better-how-to-evaluate-bitcoin-cash-based-on-block-size/). Running nodes when the blocks are big requires more resources. Also, the commissions from transaction fees are lower, which makes mining the coin less appealing. This might result in nodes being manageable only by big, private companies, making BCH even more centralized. > > ​ > > **ITS MAIN ADVANTAGE ISN’T UTILIZED…** > > Although BCH’s blocks can handle up to 32MB of data, [they have not reached even 2MB since they were introduced in 2018](https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/size-btc-bch.html#3y). What's more, their average size is currently much lower than that of Bitcoin’s blocks. > > Taking into consideration the point above about the disadvantages of bigger blocks, it makes you wonder why BCH would push for such big blocks when most of the time they don't even use 3% of their capacity. > > ​ > > **… AND EVEN IF IT WAS, THERE'S LIGHTNING NETWORK** > > [SegWit](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/segwit-segregated-witness.asp) allows second layer solutions to be implemented on Bitcoin. One of those solutions is Lightning Network which has become very popular recently after being [adopted by El Salvador](https://bitcoinmagazine.com/markets/lightning-network-bitcoin-usage-adoption-el-salvador) and [Twitter](https://www.theblockcrypto.com/post/118450/twitter-rolls-out-bitcoin-tipping-for-ios-users-via-lightning-looks-to-nfts-for-the-future). > > Lightning Network effectively eliminates the main advantage of Bitcoin Cash by allowing faster and cheaper transactions with bitcoins. Even if BCH fully utilized its 32MB blocks, it wouldn't be able to compete with Lightening Network. > > \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ > > **SUMMARY** > > Bitcoin Cash is a much worse store of value than Bitcoin and now it is also losing the electronic cash narrative, since the growing adoption of [Lightning Network](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightning_Network) makes Bitcoin a much cheaper and faster payment option. ***** Would you like to learn more? Check out the [Cointest archive](/r/CointestOfficial/wiki/cointest_archive#wiki_Bitcoin_Cash) to find submissions for other topics.

dick_slap

Pretty much, unfortunately. Still waiting for Reddit to follow their ABC's playbook! 💀

CointestMod

#Bitcoin Cash Con-Arguments Below is a Bitcoin Cash con-argument written by Blendzi0r. > # What is Bitcoin Cash (BCH)? > > Bitcoin Cash is a [hard fork](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/h/hard-fork.asp) of Bitcoin. It was launched in 2017. [It has 32MB blocks instead of Bitcoin’s 1MB](https://www.coindesk.com/learn/2015/08/21/what-is-the-bitcoin-block-size-debate-and-why-does-it-matter/), so it can handle many more transactions per second (TPS). And that’s the main difference between BTC and BCH, as its goal was to tackle [Bitcoin’s scalability problem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitcoin_scalability_problem) without the second layer solutions. > > # What are the cons of BCH? > > **IT’S CENTRALIZED** > > BCH “inherited” BTC’s supply distribution from July 2017 when it was launched but the supply held by large addresses [has become more concentrated over time](https://coinmetrics.substack.com/p/coin-metrics-state-of-the-network-2d3) (while BTC is even more decentralized today). > > In 2019, [just two mining pools were able to perform a 51% attack](https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2019/05/24/bitcoin-cash-miners-undo-attackers-transactions-with-51-attack/). And although it was done for a good cause – to stop an unknown miner from exploiting a bug – it can serve as a prove that BCH was centralized already back then. > > ​ > > **THE NARRATIVE IS ON BITCOIN’S SIDE** > > The value of Bitcoin has gone up more than 2,000% since July 2017 while BCH has stayed below its price from July 2017 most of the time, not to mention its [ATH price of $4,355](https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcoin-cash/) (it's 86% down from ATH as of 31.10.2021). > > Also liquidity and real-world usability of Bitcoin Cash [is nowhere near that of Bitcoin](https://www.investopedia.com/tech/bitcoin-vs-bitcoin-cash-whats-difference/#citation-4). It is clear that the great majority of investors chose Bitcoin after the 2017 hard fork and BCH is seen as an inferior copy. > > ​ > > **IT HAD ITS OWN HARD FORKS** > > People cringe at Internet Computer’s name, but for me, Bitcoin Satoshi Vision (BSV) takes the cake. It’s a hard fork of Bitcoin Cash that took place in late 2018. It has even larger blocks than BCH – [2GB](https://finance.yahoo.com/news/world-record-2-gigabyte-block-130000498.html). > > In 2020, there was another hard fork that produced two new chains- Bitcoin Cash ABC and Bitcoin Node. This shows that Bitcoin Cash has failed not only against Bitcoin, but had splits among its own community, further hurting its credibility. > > ​ > > **IT'S SCALABILITY COMES AT A COST** > > Bigger blocks have certain [disadvantages](https://www.sfox.com/blog/is-bigger-better-how-to-evaluate-bitcoin-cash-based-on-block-size/). Running nodes when the blocks are big requires more resources. Also, the commissions from transaction fees are lower, which makes mining the coin less appealing. This might result in nodes being manageable only by big, private companies, making BCH even more centralized. > > ​ > > **ITS MAIN ADVANTAGE ISN’T UTILIZED…** > > Although BCH’s blocks can handle up to 32MB of data, [they have not reached even 2MB since they were introduced in 2018](https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/size-btc-bch.html#3y). What's more, their average size is currently much lower than that of Bitcoin’s blocks. > > Taking into consideration the point above about the disadvantages of bigger blocks, it makes you wonder why BCH would push for such big blocks when most of the time they don't even use 3% of their capacity. > > ​ > > **… AND EVEN IF IT WAS, THERE'S LIGHTNING NETWORK** > > [SegWit](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/segwit-segregated-witness.asp) allows second layer solutions to be implemented on Bitcoin. One of those solutions is Lightning Network which has become very popular recently after being [adopted by El Salvador](https://bitcoinmagazine.com/markets/lightning-network-bitcoin-usage-adoption-el-salvador) and [Twitter](https://www.theblockcrypto.com/post/118450/twitter-rolls-out-bitcoin-tipping-for-ios-users-via-lightning-looks-to-nfts-for-the-future). > > Lightning Network effectively eliminates the main advantage of Bitcoin Cash by allowing faster and cheaper transactions with bitcoins. Even if BCH fully utilized its 32MB blocks, it wouldn't be able to compete with Lightening Network. > > \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ > > **SUMMARY** > > Bitcoin Cash is a much worse store of value than Bitcoin and now it is also losing the electronic cash narrative, since the growing adoption of [Lightning Network](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightning_Network) makes Bitcoin a much cheaper and faster payment option. ***** Would you like to learn more? Check out the [Cointest archive](/r/CointestOfficial/wiki/cointest_archive#wiki_Bitcoin_Cash) to find submissions for other topics.

CointestMod

#Bitcoin Cash Con-Arguments Below is a Bitcoin Cash con-argument written by Blendzi0r. > # What is Bitcoin Cash (BCH)? > > Bitcoin Cash is a [hard fork](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/h/hard-fork.asp) of Bitcoin. It was launched in 2017. [It has 32MB blocks instead of Bitcoin’s 1MB](https://www.coindesk.com/learn/2015/08/21/what-is-the-bitcoin-block-size-debate-and-why-does-it-matter/), so it can handle many more transactions per second (TPS). And that’s the main difference between BTC and BCH, as its goal was to tackle [Bitcoin’s scalability problem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitcoin_scalability_problem) without the second layer solutions. > > # What are the cons of BCH? > > **IT’S CENTRALIZED** > > BCH “inherited” BTC’s supply distribution from July 2017 when it was launched but the supply held by large addresses [has become more concentrated over time](https://coinmetrics.substack.com/p/coin-metrics-state-of-the-network-2d3) (while BTC is even more decentralized today). > > In 2019, [just two mining pools were able to perform a 51% attack](https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2019/05/24/bitcoin-cash-miners-undo-attackers-transactions-with-51-attack/). And although it was done for a good cause – to stop an unknown miner from exploiting a bug – it can serve as a prove that BCH was centralized already back then. > > ​ > > **THE NARRATIVE IS ON BITCOIN’S SIDE** > > The value of Bitcoin has gone up more than 2,000% since July 2017 while BCH has stayed below its price from July 2017 most of the time, not to mention its [ATH price of $4,355](https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcoin-cash/) (it's 86% down from ATH as of 31.10.2021). > > Also liquidity and real-world usability of Bitcoin Cash [is nowhere near that of Bitcoin](https://www.investopedia.com/tech/bitcoin-vs-bitcoin-cash-whats-difference/#citation-4). It is clear that the great majority of investors chose Bitcoin after the 2017 hard fork and BCH is seen as an inferior copy. > > ​ > > **IT HAD ITS OWN HARD FORKS** > > People cringe at Internet Computer’s name, but for me, Bitcoin Satoshi Vision (BSV) takes the cake. It’s a hard fork of Bitcoin Cash that took place in late 2018. It has even larger blocks than BCH – [2GB](https://finance.yahoo.com/news/world-record-2-gigabyte-block-130000498.html). > > In 2020, there was another hard fork that produced two new chains- Bitcoin Cash ABC and Bitcoin Node. This shows that Bitcoin Cash has failed not only against Bitcoin, but had splits among its own community, further hurting its credibility. > > ​ > > **IT'S SCALABILITY COMES AT A COST** > > Bigger blocks have certain [disadvantages](https://www.sfox.com/blog/is-bigger-better-how-to-evaluate-bitcoin-cash-based-on-block-size/). Running nodes when the blocks are big requires more resources. Also, the commissions from transaction fees are lower, which makes mining the coin less appealing. This might result in nodes being manageable only by big, private companies, making BCH even more centralized. > > ​ > > **ITS MAIN ADVANTAGE ISN’T UTILIZED…** > > Although BCH’s blocks can handle up to 32MB of data, [they have not reached even 2MB since they were introduced in 2018](https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/size-btc-bch.html#3y). What's more, their average size is currently much lower than that of Bitcoin’s blocks. > > Taking into consideration the point above about the disadvantages of bigger blocks, it makes you wonder why BCH would push for such big blocks when most of the time they don't even use 3% of their capacity. > > ​ > > **… AND EVEN IF IT WAS, THERE'S LIGHTNING NETWORK** > > [SegWit](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/segwit-segregated-witness.asp) allows second layer solutions to be implemented on Bitcoin. One of those solutions is Lightning Network which has become very popular recently after being [adopted by El Salvador](https://bitcoinmagazine.com/markets/lightning-network-bitcoin-usage-adoption-el-salvador) and [Twitter](https://www.theblockcrypto.com/post/118450/twitter-rolls-out-bitcoin-tipping-for-ios-users-via-lightning-looks-to-nfts-for-the-future). > > Lightning Network effectively eliminates the main advantage of Bitcoin Cash by allowing faster and cheaper transactions with bitcoins. Even if BCH fully utilized its 32MB blocks, it wouldn't be able to compete with Lightening Network. > > \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ > > **SUMMARY** > > Bitcoin Cash is a much worse store of value than Bitcoin and now it is also losing the electronic cash narrative, since the growing adoption of [Lightning Network](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightning_Network) makes Bitcoin a much cheaper and faster payment option. ***** Would you like to learn more? Check out the [Cointest archive](/r/CointestOfficial/wiki/cointest_archive#wiki_Bitcoin_Cash) to find submissions for other topics.

ShotCryptographer523

Wow, surprised Aussie ABC news is covering Bitcoin.

FlowersforAlgorand

Hypothetically, suppose you had $500 and bought 1000 tokens of "ABC" at $.50. It then drops to $.25, leaving you with a bag with $250. After it drops you decide to buy more, grabbing another 1000 tokens for $250. "ABC" then starts a run, and gets up to $.375. At this price you would have 3 possible options: Option 1 - Sell all 2000 tokens at $.375 to break even. Option 2 - Sell the recent buy of 1000 tokens for $.25 to make $125 profit. Option 3 - Don't sell anything and hope to it goes higher. What's your play?

RetardStockBot

I've only watched a single [YouTube channel](https://www.youtube.com/@BCBacker) over like last 3 years and I've learnt that Technical Analysis is no joke. The way this person utilizes Technical Analysis on crypto, stocks, metals, also narrative the Whales want to portray and how that leads to shrimps always wrong footed in tops and bottoms is just something different. Elliot waves, ABC corrections, Fibonacci retracements, super cycles (crypto super cycles are more related to stocks bull/bear cycles, not Bitcoin Halving). How the majority of people get shaken out at exactly the most worst time by the people pulling the strings behind the scenes, I know, it sounds absurd. I mentioned only a fraction of the tools this person uses in depth which totally shifted my perspective of how Technical Analysis should be utilized on crypto. This person heavily relies on using relevant public information cohesively to analyze market moves and it's scary how often predictions are correct. I want to highlight that predictions are for crypto market moves taking multiple months, even years to play out. This person thinks that we should see one more [Altcoin Season](https://www.blockchaincenter.net/altcoin-season-index/) relatively soon.

Inevitable_Doctor576

Coffee has his own show, and it's on the internet. Over the top cable TV is in the middle of it's death rattles with all the new talent self publishing. Who in their right mind would bother sharing creative control with Fox/CNN/NBC/ABC if they don't have to?

pezdal

Always remember that correlation does not always equal causation. Humans (especially reporters) want to find connections. ""Stock ABC is up on Blah Blah news." will always be said, regardless of the truth, even if the truth were known. It usually isn't. Bitcoin - and indeed most financial asset - pricing is the result of human behaviour interacting within an extremely complicated dynamic system. Someone needs cash to buy a boat at the same time that someone is sitting on the edge of a decision whether to sell or hold and all of sudden a trigger on someone's sell algorithm goes off..... price drop crosses a threshold that someone else was waiting for an execute order...... none of this has anything to do with interest rates or housing starts or binance or .... I am not saying the SEC news had NO impact, of course it played a part, but we see bigger swings on days with no news all the time.

trrrring

So ABC1234567 is not a good password?

Yeh_nah_yeh_

However, reporting from ABC seemingly misunderstands how the ATMs work. It said, “Thieves were not successful because, here’s the thing, Bitcoin is a digital currency so there’s not actual money inside those machines.” Lol, they were so close😂 just think a little longer next time guys

ChemicalAnybody6229

Just transfer to a cold wallet. As simple as ABC.

masetoja

>borg\_6s here you go: libgen.rocks/ads.php?md5=7D394651158ABC9470CBCCE538FAAA49

wildlight

z cash is a fork of BCH, so yes similar. I don't really follow z cash, the developer to orgionally released the bitcoin ABC client which was the hardfork that created BCH was basically rejected by the community after trying to implement a developer tax that would send a potion of the block reward directly to them. it was introduced as a hardfork and was rejected by the majority of clients causing the hardfork that created z cash. I personally wouldn't support a project that has developers that try and force such a significant change onto the platform. BCH development is funded entirely through crowd funding on flipstarter the decentlaized crowd funding platform built on BCH.

awfullotofocelots

I'm literally checking in on this sub and my accounts after being away from crypto since the pandemic started, and yes, it's the same shit it was then. Will they won't they on how global xyz issue will affect economic ABC.

jps_

This is a *great* question and central to the whole concept of investing in crypto. The simple answer in the present is that they are obviously worth something because people are paying for them. Things are worth precisely what someone will pay for them. No more, and no less. The harder question is figuring out what we can *expect* them to be worth some time in the future. A speculator is quite happy to buy now and flip for a profit or a loss... it's a gamble. But an investor, with a long term goal of wealth accumulation wants to have some idea that if they pay $X now they can expect $(X+dx) some time in the future, and furthermore, that (X+dx)/X is sufficiently greater than 1 for this specific investment that it's worth not putting $X in some other investment, where (X+dY)/X is likely to be greater than 1. What that means is it's not only important to say "what is this crypto worth" today, but it's also important to ask "what will it be worth when the time comes?", and not only that, to have a reasonably robust answer to the followup question "why?" With crypto, this second question is *really* hard to answer. Because we have to imagine that someone tomorrow will want PEPE because.. it's still a fad? Hmmm... ... OK, maybe get serious you say... What about ETH? After all, it's deflationary right? Well, again having less of something in the future doesn't mean automatically it's going to be worth more. If I shave my stomach, my belly button will collect less lint. By virtue of increased scarcity, it will certainly be more valuable than the lint from my presently hairy lint trap, but I have to assume negligibly more than nil is still nil. That means we need to think of a reason why ETH itself is valuable today of it's own accord. A so-called "intrinsic" value. Thus, if in the future this reason is still true, and there's less of it, we can expect and maybe even model some sort of return. And this means we have to set aside the hypothesis that it has value for the same reason PEPE has value, and ask what *else* is driving the value. And almost all of the answers we can come up with, other than "because some unknown stranger is willing to pay $2K for one of them" does not extrapolate with much certainty into the future. "Investors" who need a good logical reason for something's present value get quite concerned when they can't see it. Because it's not like the only choice is crypto or nothing. There are many places to invest. Ranging from mattress to that crazy idea your friend has. And crypto is right up there. Every dollar you invest in crypto is a dollar you can't invest somewhere else. So you are giving up that "opportunity cost". It's one thing to say that Company ABC has unit economics that take $1 of raw materials and make $1.05 in finished goods, thereby driving a profit of $0.05 every time through the cycle... making it plausibly worth $0.05 per cycle per year, for every $1 it has on hand... ... and another thing entirely to say that 1.00 ETH generates 1.07 ETH after a year, but 1.00 ETH is rationally worth ??, making it worth 1.07 x $?? That in itself is not a bad situation: it's OK to buy something now and take a chance that it will or won't be worth more later. But without that compelling reason, it means we're speculating. There are some folks who pooh-pooh speculation as an amateur's game. However, they won't get rich buying a million bucks of PEPE for a few hundred. So they all miss out on these kinds of things. But they also tend to miss out on buying stuff that turns out to be worthless. So it depends on your goals, perspective, risk-tolerance and "investment" strategy.

afkfrom

You can generate endless keys. Imagine your seed phrase is two words: "banana" and "potato". If your seed phrase is "banana" and "potato", this seed will generate a key "ABC". It will always generate "ABC" as long as you use the words "banana" and "potato". Now if you use "potato" and "banana" (the other way around), it will generate "DEF", and always "DEF". That's it for private & public key basically. Now that you generated your key, you will then use this key to have one address, or many. One key, one seedphrase, can have multiple addresses (or wallets). Just like your bank login doesn't mean "one bank account", it's just the access to the vault, then you can have your entire business within one single vault. Current practice is to use 24 randomly generated words, it's long and impossible to crack.