Reddit Posts
A recipe for pump and why SOLORDI is not your regular PND MEME
Manta New Paradigm (confirmed) - I bridged, now what?
Is it logical to equate your bitcoin stack to a mining reward?
POV: Peter Schiff watching the Bitcoin chart since 2011. - “Ding Ding Ding.”
POV: you sell a stack one hour before a 100% pump
POV: You're the creator of an NFT or Crypto project and you post something on Twitter.
POV - I bought Bitcoin 13 years ago | My 13-Year Bitcoin Journey: "Investor to Crypto Success Story
POV: PeterSchiff watching the Bitcoin chart for 12 years now.
How I fumbled $500,000 last year at 22 years old.
Investing in crypto for me is generally just interesting
POV: Alex Machinsky, CEO of @CelsiusNetwork, in New York arrested. #UnbankYourself
Crypto is a playground for the rich and I have a feeling US Government is manipulating it....
POV: We're Stuck in an Eternal Bear Market
POV: We're stuck in an eternal bear market.
What’s to stop ETH from being the next AOL?
Mentions
Nice POV, never thought about that.
I've learned it the hard way Nowadays i send money, buy & transfer it to my ledger instantly Thank you for your POV :)
Trading and Alts are no option for me, bit thanks for your POV
Thank you for your POV :) No, mining isnt a point for me. It's not worth the investment into some rigs etc. I just want to buy BTC but have some issues with myself after the whole FTX stuff and now been trying to talk / write with OGs to find back to me and my plan from back then
This 👆. Concur with this POV.
It's fun to watch America decline from a Canadian POV. Nothing is going to stop the great train wreck of USA. Definitely not the way you organize yourselves. It's a good thing Trump showed us the US cards so we're prepared for your attempts at theft as you scramble in the midst of decline. And now your allies have zero trust in you. You're doing great, keep it up.
My POV - it’s inevitable and will happen with next 5 years.
Usually slashing is reserved for deliberate malicious activity. On Ethereum for example: From their POV, they couldn’t get the other nodes to attest so they were unable to finalize. From everyone else’s POV they were effectively inactive and leaking. Once their nodes reorganized, their TXs went back into the mempool and were placed on their rightful block
Yup, and most of those Facebook videos that are: “POV: You bought Bitcoin back in 2012” are nothing more than imaginations. I can tell you only a handful of people have held since 2012 and didn’t stop.
Not trolling. Just giving my POV. I'd love say I was wrong calling top for this cycle, and if I am wrong, I'll be the first to say it.
Starting to think we may have topped for this cycle. Hope I'm wrong, but from a TA POV, think this cycle may have peeked.
No one seems to know what POV means.
Why is the butter staring at someone working fast food? What's his POV got to do with it?
I wasn't, just pointing out the poor use of the POV.
Why are we staring at a person down on their luck? POV.
Don't forget your company is a separate entity to you. In order to change the ownership of your personal BTC to your company, the transfer would be considered a taxable event (for CGT). Also, bear in mind the BTC within the company will be classed as an intangible asset and any profits will be subject to corporation tax. From a tax POV, it would likely be better to hold a spot ETF within an ISA or SIPP, than putting it in the company.
Hi! Thanks for coming by to share your experience. What helps you make these extremely risky trades? TA? I mean, how can one spot a future gem so early? Please, explain your POV for your BONK play - what caught your attention and made you believe the risk is worth it.
Sounds good until you realize that in the future, it will most likely be a world where Bitcoin is accepted more by actual people, and there are no taxes when you buy a car off someone with Bitcoin. A Bitcoin ETF is probably a pretty stupid idea from the investors' POV. There will be lots of people who, 10 years from now, will have wished they just bought Bitcoin. You can sound smart and throw around highly intelligent terms all you want, but common sense reigns supreme here. Let me see you board a plane and take your Bitcoin ETF with you across the world. A Bitcoin ETF completely ignores the while point of Bitcoin and the creator is laughing at you
What's the fundamental difference? I don't see it. They've branded it and that invalidates it? From my POV, they're contributing 1 Bitcoin daily to this "cause" or whatever you want to call it. Until they start double counting or just flat out lying, I'd say they're doing good. Similar things happen everywhere. Money is allocated in bulk but actually distributed at smaller denominations more frequently. For example, this is common in education, research, or government. $100 million granted, but it's actually distributed weekly. The movement is all internal to the government, but the money being in the end account is what matters, because that's where it's useful.
I have to add that BTC, and realistically, all financialized markets, from the Fed's POV, are convenient sinks for excess liquidity. They saw BTC as a threat early on, but realized that it helps reduce or forestall inflation in the currency. I think that this is the idea behind the concept of a 'Crack-up boom': excess money printing inflates prices, but eventually, people want to use assets that are only representational. If too many people decide its time to realize their gains... pop.
>For me the fact that a highly leveraged purely speculative venture might hold 3% of the asset that is supposed to usher humanity into the future is reason enough to lose all hopes in BTC. Sounds like you dont understand what fiat leverage is or what bitcoin's purpose is anyway, so I'm not too worried about your loss of faith in whatever you thought bitcoin is. From a sound money POV, we have long expected BTC bought with fiat leverage, and hope to see a whole lot more of it. We need to drive the dollar to zero, and this is the way.
Whats the expected Ath for btc in your POV? is there any chances it will go more up in this cycle>?
Yeah dude, rules are kind of just thrown around every so often. Can be a little frightening from an investor POV
Rent is just not good enough in my opinion. Considering the hassle that comes with it. I understand your POV though. I Will be investing in real estate via a company where I’ll be funding so I’m still diversified in some way.
How dare you use POV accurately.
From my POV, on my situation it is. You alone can say so or not
I understand your POV, but looking at BTCs performance vs. the S&P 500 makes it hard to justify 80% investment IMO. Also, ~3% of the stocks carry the S&P 500, the rest basically lose money. I think it would be better for OP to do research on which stocks those are and consider investing in those for bigger gains.
Never, ever advise others. My sister wants investing advice from time to time. I always give the same answer. She then suggests getting together to info-share. I’ll be doing the info sharing, I’m not interested because if something goes down, it’s my fault. She says it won’t be, it will. Don’t give advice. Tell the others an interesting POV but tell them to do their own diligence, don’t take the POV as advice. Otherwise they will ask about the investment as it goes down and when you say “I sold weeks ago”, they’ll be pissed you didn’t inform them. If they need a financial advisor, tell them to go get one.
If you plan on retiring at a reasonable age i'd say you should have at least $10k in the market by mid 20s and close to 6 figures by 30. (This is from an American POV) Especially with how inflation is moving, if you don't have a significant amount invested by the end of your 20s to take advantage of compounding interest, you may struggle to retire when you want.
from his POV, a great deal is only great if he benefits the most from it, everything else doesn’t matter.
Think of from the POV of 2 people. One thinking there aren't gpo gto be those 4 year swings anymore.. they're going to get rekt of the cycle does repeat because odds are they are trading or paperhands. The other assumes there will be a big down cycle but then when they are wrong they are just pleasantly surprised. (Or.ledt behind waiting for the dip that never comes I guess) Take care.
Did you get banned for saying what you just said? Nope.. I actually value your POV and opinion because I am open to what you have to contribute to the conversation .. I am an investor and I don’t make decisions without input from both sides but f the trade
Outside of US most global powers have already banned it or disincentivized it to a certain extent. So if all the major economies become hostile, Bitcoin will still exist, and even if retail holds on because all their life savings are in it, institutions and sovereign wealth funds will exit. Recent rise from $75k to $100k+ can be attributed to an extent to Spot ETFs. So while I agree with your point too, I consider it an optimistic POV. I however like to keep the risks in mind to keep myself in check and not putting all my eggs in this basket. All eggs in one basket: Chance of +2000% gains over 10 years and -50% over ten years. Some diversification: Chance of +2000% gains over 10 years and +8% over ten years.
POV: Du hast deinen Entry verpasst
Just trying to understand your POV. You say you lose trust in BTC if only few people hold it. Is that because you fear price reactions or because you think it influences the network? I trust that I am able to create a transaction offline, broadcast it on a best effort basis & have it gets processed without censorship. That is what I trust in. And that ablility isn't compromised by large holders but it might get compromised by miner centralization.
From an investor POV, Coin or Token does matter… PEPE is piggybacking ETH, a blockchain known for expensive fees. Imagine taking profits, only for a huge chunk to be deducted… As a token, the original owners can mint new tokens anytime they want for themselves…which are basically rug pulls. Having a Layer 1 blockchain coin that requires mining prevents this. Not to mention the existing creators of PEPE are anonymous and can also come back just to mint new PEPE for themselves, which pollutes the token pool, making PEPE a high risk long term investment. This is why “BTC is king” for investors. Layer 1s are a good foundation for long term investments.
I am getting hung up on risk free, I don’t see what makes this risk free from the POV of the lender. It just sounds like a loan secured by a historically extremely volatile asset class. If the price of a token craters does that not therefore crater the value of the underlying security the loan? Sounds like pretty significant risk.
What's their website? PS. I can google, but because of phishing, I prefer to start my due diligence from your POV
Satoshi POV storyline of how and why he travelled back in time.
They could move to POV - Proof of Vitalik. He can just wave to everybody on occasion at random times. If he is ok, then Eth is ok.
Another POV: It’s a buying opportunity and a character building practice.
Unpopular POV: Newbs are late. With BTC now firmly over $100k, most newbs cannot become whole coiners. That ship has sailed …
I’m very interested from an experimental POV.
POV Bitcoin hits 1 Million and your wife is filing for divorce to live of half of your wealth with your boyfriend
You want my answe? I'll give a few. My bags POV: Yes, it will moon forever steadily. The institution money changed the game this time, really. Me caring about yoy POV: No, believe in cycle theory until proven false. The truth POV: No one knows s about f.
> That’s the slowdown I mean—spam pushes out normal transactions. Ok, that's not the definition of "slowdown" that the developers think of. Instead, we consider "slowdown" to be actual impact on CPU and memory usage that exceeds the average usage of a typical transaction. What you're describing is that the "spam" causes a high fee market, and that's definitely a concern. However, high fee markets, as we have seen with ordinals and many many times long past, resolve themselves eventually when those "spammers" run out of money. Furthermore, if those people want to make their transactions, they can and do directly submit their transcations to miners, bypassing mempools. This is trivially easy to do with things like MARA's Slipstream. When they do this, it actually makes it worse for everyone since direct submission removes information from fee estimation algorithms. Now, instead of being able to see the mempool and see that feerates are high, what you end up doing is making a transaction with a fee that you think is enough, and then finding out when a block is found that it actually wasn't. Lastly, Bitcoin is going to need a fee market eventually. Eventually, the block subsidy is going to be negligible, and miners will have to be sustained by fees. Any way you slice it, there has to be some point in time where the mempool is consistently full and fees generally increase as otherwise mining will stop being profitable and the security of the network goes down. > Without the OP_RETURN limit, a bad actor (say the CIA or someone with money to burn) could put illegal stuff, like child pornography, into the blockchain Even with the OP_RETURN limit, a bad actor can already do this. They can already do this with the inscriptions script construction, and that allows putting up to 4 MB into the blockchain whereas OP_RETURN would be limited to 1 MB. Furthermore, even without inscriptions, it's still possible to do it by creating outputs with fake hashes or fake pubkeys that actually encode the data. > They’re ignoring people who disagree (Samson Mow said there’s “no consensus”) Can you clarify what has actually been done that you think is "ignoring people who disagree"? Having read through the entire mailing list discussion and all of the comments on both PRs, I really don't think that's the case. Certainly there is no consensus, but there's been lively debate and discussion, and no action has actually been taken. Furthermore, several comments stated that they think the options should be preserved, and another PR was opened that does exactly that. That does not seem like ignoring people who disagree. > silencing critics Some of the biggest critics are wizkid057 and luke-jr. Their comments are still visible and readable, and in fact, many people have (tried to) engage them in discussion. And not just them, there's tons of comments in both PRs with debate going back and forth, each side trying to refute the other. I would not say that this is silencing critics. While several comments in the PR were hidden, these were hidden because they do not add to the converstion. Many of these are simply "Concept ACK" or "Concept NACK", which ultimately is not all that useful to the discussion and mainly ends up making it harder to read. Several comments were also hidden because they are off topic or abusive. However, I do not think any comments which left novel criticisms of the PR were actually hidden. > (Giacomo Zucco’s comments got deleted) There have not been many deleted comments. I count 4 deleted comments, and none of them appear to be from him. While I don't have a record of what the comments were, 3 of the comments were from accounts that look like spammers. 1 of the comments was actually from a regular contributor. None of the accounts look like Giacomo's. In fact, I don't think he has participated in the PR discussions at all, unless his Github name is not giacomozucco. > some devs have financial ties to projects with conflicts of interests. Can you cite any evidence for that? AFAIK, this claim seems to stem from the fact that Jameson Lopp is an investor in Citrea, a company that would benefit from this change, but are already planning on deploying their product without it. Jameson commented on the PR, but he is neither the person who opened it, nor the person who started the discussion. He's not even a Core Dev as he doesn't regularly participate in code review or submit PRs. From the perspective of the project, he's just another rando coming by to give their opinion. > They downplay risks (like past spam from Veriblock) I don't recall anyone referring to Veriblock or anyone citing risks from past spam. > and take away our choices (they removed a setting to force us to accept this) You write this as if a decision has been made and the PR merged. But no PR related to OP_RETURN has been merged. Neither Peter Todd's original PR that removes the option, nor Greg Sanders' alternate PR that leaves the option have been merged. In fact, of these 2 PRs, I think the one that's more likely to be merged is the second which leaves the option in, but of course no such merge decision has been made yet. > That's my POV. Tthe main point here is *how* this change is being implemented when it's deeply controversial. My POV is that this has been severely overblown and there's a ton of misinformation going around about what's actually happened. It seems like there's a bunch of influencers going around screaming as if the world is ending who also are getting their information second or third-hand rather than having actually participated in the discussions and reporting what they observed.
You are right, it would serve them well to do that. But many there have completely locked their POV and unfortunately it is not based on reality or facts alone, but rather emotions.
People talk about how Bitcoin is too slow and the fees are too high to use as money while happily using credit cards with * [Fees of 2.5 to 3.5% + 10 to 30 cents.](https://www.nerdwallet.com/article/small-business/credit-card-processing-fees) * [Settlement times of 1 to 3 days](https://www.fool.com/money/research/average-credit-card-processing-fees-costs-america/) The difference is that merchants have had 50 years to get used to hiding these problems from you. Besides little things like "universal adoption", the main thing Bitcoin is missing from a consumer POV is a service for chargebacks and fraud protection. Most problems in crypto are technically solvable with escrow. The real barrier is the social inertia. *Meanwhile...* what I'd love to see would be a Kaspa-based stablecoin pegged to the US Dollar circa March 31, 1999 and debasement-adjusted from there. So, as the US Dollar printer runs, the Matrix Dollar goes up to keep the real value stable. So, one Matrix Dollar would be worth about [$5 today.](https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MABMM301USM189S)
POV: You are released from jail after 7 years. DIAMOND HANDS 💎 You check your portfolio. *Straight back to jail*
Thank you for a realistic POV
It's probably because the second point threatens your POV. Both points are equally correct.
Very clear and well said, I love you POV
My POV : YOU don't know what a nazi is.
POV: You don’t know what a Nazi is.
POV: you believe Elon Musk
Op doesn't understand POV.
It's a very American POV since they're basically used to equate consumer protection with an awkward smile and a shrug emoji
POV: You forget you had short
Yes going from logarithmic to linear growth is what I'm talking about. It's just considerably less interesting from a speculative POV.
If you want them to hodl and really learn the way of bitcoin, that's a good idea. A paper wallet would suffice, tho. Since this person is not close to me, and I just want them to get a glimpse of a new POV (the one we all know), but I don't want to go through the trouble of teaching them, their coins will be in an exchange. They can take it from there. But if it was for my family, that's exactly what I'd do.
If you look at their trend for 1) Additional paid-in capital 2) Total Liabilities 3) Outstanding shares 500K BTC is much less appealing from a stockholder POV. In 10 years a BTC holder will be far better off than a MSTR holder.
POV: You're in a "how to lose all of your money as soon as possible" competition and your opponent is this guy.
POV: Thank U Mr. Trump.. Thank U.. Thank U.. Thank U Mr. Trump.. Thank U Thank U Thank U Mr. Trump.. Thank U... Thank U.. Thank U for the Trump Coin.. Thank U Thank Thank U.. Thank U for the tariffs.. Thank U for the sunday insider trade.. Thank U .. Thank U Mr. Trump.. Thank U for the Zelenskyy Clown show in ur office.... Thank U for the Psyop... Thank U ..Thank Thank U.. Thank U MAGA CULT! Thank U for ur tweet in July 2019, what u really think about crypto. This will backfire! Karma speaks for itself... only 3 Years and 11 month left... year of the snake.. try to leave 2025 with more profits then losses.. good luck! Thank U for reading!
POV: Thank U Mr. Trump.. Thank U.. Thank U.. Thank U Mr. Trump.. Thank U Thank U Thank U Mr. Trump.. Thank U... Thank U.. Thank U for the Trump Coin.. Thank U Thank Thank U.. Thank U for the tariffs.. Thank U for the sunday insider trade.. Thank U .. Thank U Mr. Trump.. Thank U for the Zelenskyy Clown show in ur office.... Thank U for the Psyop... Thank U ..Thank Thank U.. Thank U MAGA CULT! Thank U for ur tweet in July 2019, what u really think about crypto. This will backfire! Karma speaks for itself... only 3 Years and 11 month left... year of the snake.. try to leave 2025 with more profits then losses.. good luck! Thank U for reading!
POV: Thank U Mr. Trump.. Thank U.. Thank U.. Thank U Mr. Trump.. Thank U Thank U Thank U Mr. Trump.. Thank U... Thank U.. Thank U for the Trump Coin.. Thank U Thank Thank U.. Thank U for the tariffs.. Thank U for the sunday insider trade.. Thank U .. Thank U Mr. Trump.. Thank U for the Zelenskyy Clown show in ur office.... Thank U for the Psyop... Thank U ..Thank Thank U.. Thank U MAGA CULT! Thank U for ur tweet in July 2019, what u really think about crypto. This will backfire! Karma speaks for itself... only 3 Years and 11 month left... year of the snake.. try to leave 2025 with more profits then losses.. good luck!
POV: Thank U Mr. Trump.. Thank U.. Thank U.. Thank U Mr. Trump.. Thank U Thank U Thank U Mr. Trump Thank U... Thank U.. Thank U for the Trump Coin.. Thank U Thank Thank U.. Thank U for the tariffs.. Thank U for the sunday insider trade.. Thank U .. Thank U Mr. Trump.. Thank U for the Zelenskyy Clown show.. Thank U for the Psyop... Thank U Thank Thank U.. Thank U MAGA CULT! This will backfire!! Karma speaks for itself... only 3 Years and 11 month left... year of the snake.. try to leave 2025 with more profits then losses.. good luck!
Tbh I think from a government perspective it’s a brilliant move. Give some more breadcrumbs with pretty fluffy language so that crypto People who voted for trump can interpret how they wish and retain hopium. Saylor claims to have lots of creative ideas for budget neutral strategies. Also everyone claiming more countries will follow, but I don’t know am I buying that. Besides USA, which didn’t deliver in my POV, you have a handful of other countries talking about it, like Bhutan, which is my ignorance, but I haven’t even heard of it. 😅 also some scandal coming out from El Salvador in the last couple of days. I don’t claim to know anything but from a personal standpoint I think this bull run for BTC is coming to an end. It’s going to be a tough year for markets by the looks of things and this was the next hype piece BTC had going for it. Also even people into crypto are starting to get annoyed with the trump grift. Last weeks inside trading tweet, sacks today gaslighting people saying that outside of BTC the other coins mentioned on the tweet were never going to be included.
I think the same way, I think there is going to be a point where is no longer viable. Talking about code, doge coin the meme was created out of BTC’s code back then and I believe the creators improved it with some upgrades that BTC needed, if it is about code, there are “better” coins out there, the algorithm that btc is based, the SHA-2 (I think it means secure hash algorithm) comes from the NSA, I don’t quite remember the year but there was an article explaining how BTC’s code was based of SHA-2 who was created by a mathematician under the NSA, also satoshi nakamoto loosely means central intelligence, some say CIA, anyway this new money was created on an economic crisis and I don’t want to get super technical in the cycle of money, but there is a cycle where the money goes from gold based to paper to then the country in power falls and then another country replaces it as a world power (ehmmmm Us and china, like England, us, France, all the way back from rome) and regularly they take about 70 years each, it’s coincidental that the BTC came at the time where paper money for the U.S. is about to finishes its cycle. In my opinion BTC will be used for a “store of value lot at least that’s the last big use it is running around for this coin, but We needed someone to trust for then to build over it, get more coins to be real world assets and change the economic point of view, upgrade the network of money that now is being runner by banks. I believe Mr Dan pena said that if people new who satoshi nakamoto is, they will all sell BTC at the same time and the price would go to 0, IMO this is a bit extreme, but he has a point where the value of BTC is attached to the name of the inventor, taking into consideration that the creator has most of the btc. Anyway this was a great post and it’s wiiiiiiiild that they banned you for pointing out this who I think is a fair and valid POV.
leverage on a platform with margin calls... like i will never understand that. I understand fiat leverage without them; fixed term loans etc. those make perfect sense and are dip-proof. and when they have terms over 10 years, its basically free money because inflation will cover interest and more. and when you can take out new debt to cover old, you can also avoid taxes. Its great and makes you wonder how much longer fiat debt will exist. But why would you take out debt in a casino where the house can clear out a winning bet and make it a loser because of a temporary dip, AKA a "margin call"? Because its convenient? Because you dont mind risk? From the POV of someone who chooses bitcoin precisely to avoid the risks of fiat, I really dont understand margin debt. If you want to donate to the rich, you can just send money to billionaires directly.
From my POV it dies not really make sense to own actual crypto except for BTC. Everything else I only do futures trading.
> why all other crypto except BTC is a scam waiting to happen. I have written about this thoroughly from an economic and technical point of view. Most of you just keep spamming the same thing over and over again. Historical data shows a crypto's long-term value is predominantly driven by its sticky social vector, which they view the token as valuable from a social dimension. In other words, the most valuable tokens are permissionless store of value units, driven by social, not technical, consensus. ***Bitcoin has the largest and most Lindy social network using it as a store of value***. When you look at that social graph, you don't include tourists who trade within a year, then disappear for the next 3-6 years. Consequently, the most ***proven vertical of keeping value over time, having buyers perceive it as a speculative macro asset, not a tech bet.*** Now, you might argue, "The past doesn't mean the future." Just because the best use case so far is a permissionless store of value doesn't mean ***there is no room for other things, right***? You can speculate that tomorrow night will turn purple because the Martians decide to troll us. But those types of "whatever goes" speculation aren't meaningful because you can get whatever you want, untethered to reality. A more principled way to speculate is to think from 1) the fundamentals of demand and supply POV + 2) what blockchain tech can do to create goods/services to meet demand. But once you realize blockchain has inherent trappings, it becomes inefficient in doing many things in competition against alternative technologies. So why would others want to adopt an inherently inefficient technology to service their goods? So far, the data shows they only adopt the tech to make money off ppl who made money from betting on the right permissionless store of value token. In other words, ***they are just looking to turn crypto users into their customers, not much else.*** > ETH is a joke ETH joined the Silicon Valley bandwagon and branded itself as a "DApp store." This is horrible branding because it presumes crypto can attract users who aren't interested in crypto, even though every successful crypto DApp has said otherwise. > SOL SOL is taking ETH VC's floppy seconds and joined on the "DApp store" narrative. The only "breakout" DApp they got requires infinitely fast attrition of new users to sustain their revenue stream - it is not sustainable. > XRP Everything else XRP says it wants to do has been done more professionally by others. It runs on a meme narrative. > ADA It is one of the more vaporware in the top 10. If you want to bet on tech, that shouldn't be a choice. If you want to bet on ADA, you are really just betting on a meme.
From his POV, the following quote applies: “You either die a hero, or you live long enough to see yourself become the villain”
You need to look at it from another POV. Don't look at how much $ your BTC is worth. Just look at the actual number of satoshis you have. Keep stacking, hold, dont sell.
POV: when you elect a USD maxi 😂
From an accounting POV, what journal entry/to what account should I write this to?
with prices going down, you buy what you need when you need it. with prices inflating, you spend money you down't have on stuff you don't need to impress people you don't like. That's why so many folks got into debt to "keep up with the Joneses". From my POV, the former is the more sustainable concept.
So because DYDX is “well known and respected,” that automatically means they can’t have bad design or flaws? Come on. That’s like saying a major bank can’t have a system glitch just because it’s reputable. And yeah, they usually warn about liquidity and slippage, but the fact that they didn’t this time should’ve been a red flag to you, not a reason to blindly press market order. That’s on you for assuming everything was fine instead of verifying first. Markets are brutal, and exchanges—no matter how big—aren’t perfect. As for “it could happen to anyone,” sure, but it didn’t. It happened to you. And instead of adapting and taking responsibility for your execution, you’re here blaming the exchange for not holding your hand. If you’re gonna be in this game, move smarter instead of crying about what “should” have happened. And just because my POV is in the minority doesn’t make it wrong. It just means most people don’t want to admit when their own mistakes cost them money.
Consider it from the POV of the owner of that miner: Instead of using it to mine Bitcoin, they rent it out to you. So, they must think that they will earn more in rent from you than they would gain by using it to mine Bitcoin. If they could mine more than your rent, they wouldn't rent to you in the first place. Which, when you turn it around, means, that you will pay more in rent than you will earn by mining. You'll make a loss. At least if electricity costs the same for both of you. If you have greatly different costs (their electricity is very expensive, your's is free) then there might be a small sliver of a sweet spot where the rent is actually a bit below *your* mining income (with free electricity), but from their POV is still above *their* potential mining income (if they factor in their expensive electricity). But that's unlikely to be the case, and even if it is, it means that your net income from "mining - rent" won't be more than their electricity costs, i.e. very little and not worth the effort.
POV: US sells their bitcoin to “find” the missing gold. 🤣
They claim some kind of issue with my info when I tried signing up. I tried to contest their decision to deny me an account to no avail. They would not give me a reason for the denial. Pretty shitty of them, from my POV
"Bitcoin > gold" come on already... stop this. Also you are literally wishing panic so that you get richer, people arent going to buy bitcoin for that reason because its negatively seen compared to gold. Its much much more speculative and less less adopted than gold. If gold disappeared the whole stock and market will go into a bigger recession than the covid one. This isnt a debate between gold and btc and whats better, these two are literally different. Seriously we people still didnt learn that the economy isnt just about fiat or gold but a bunch different forms of money and that can include crypto in the future but not necessarily and only btc, but a bunch of cryptos ? Confirmation bias and POV must be taken into count.
I don’t understand the question. Every thing that’s happened fits with the charts. Whether Trump won or not, we’d have had the same result within this period, speaking from a TA POV.
Show us your peer reviewed study that you are citing so confidently. You just ignored mine. I think you're full of shit. Show us. And I bet even if you find a study, it will be a terrible source because you're gullible and will believe anything if it supports your POV even if it's from a geocities page.
Price increase flattens as adoption increases looking at the past 15 years. I do believe reaching 1 mil will be quick (~10 years). But post that it’s hard to see the rationale of it still increasing 70-80% per year realistic. Halving won’t be as significant etc. Tell me your POV though.
POV you can’t buy more at this very moment
Bitcoin is not going to fail. A couple of days ago I listened to an interview with Ricardo Salinas, 3rd richest man in Mexico (https://youtu.be/SiV7UhoiZM8?si=O_N6iz_IULn4l2Ns . Spanish only unfortunately). He is full on bitcoin for very interesting reasons that are different to what I thought about BTC. It really opened eyes. You don't "imvest" in bitcoin, you are 'getting out' of the FIAT deflationary scam. I've been in Crypto since 2015. But really the POV mentioned by this guy made me think differently about bitcoin.
Out of question. The they are not competent enough (for starters) and, most importantly, way too risky from their POV. Makes zero sense.
You are right, there is bullish crypto news weekly. The problem here is that from macroeconomic POV we are facing major uncertainty. High risk assets usually do not perform well under these circumstances. That is what I tried to say here.
Tech people don’t understand bitcoin in a different way that TradFi bro don’t understand bitcoin, which is also different from how the nomies on the street don’t understand bitcoin. You kinda need to mix some tech with some conservative / Austrian economic with some Libertarianism to be onboard. The tech itself isn’t that impressive. From a techie’s POV it’s just a slow database. Distributed network exists long before Bitcoin etc etc. It’s all just a long ranty way of saying, yes if you only look at the “tech” of a blockchain then it’s natural for you to be unimpressed and wonder what all the fuss is about, why the number has gone up so much.
So, bulls: What's your thesis for how much we go up from here and why? Because from my POV, given facts as we know them now, I'm not seeing anything to cause a breakout before July.
Oh this sub is totally an echo chamber. I'm not denying that. It's also filled with noobs only concerned about price. Most real bitcoiners aren't even here anymore. I just wanted to point out that a sub dedicated to specific topics, unfortunately, isn't really the place to change minds. The style of your post was not really an invite to an open debate. You very much stated your POV as fact and demanded we give props.
Would love to understand your view, happy to just listen and take it in, just want to get the other sides POV
The US would have to be in full meltdown before this happens. Control over social security, healthcare, the internet, surveillance..it's already been taken. But even then, bullets won't win. China knows this, Russia knows this. US is adopting their strategies. From a crypto POV, I think we'll be lucky enough to catch the billionaire wave and make out on top.
I would say memecoins are good for making a quick buck from a retail POV. However, in the long run, it can prove to institutions that a chain is able to maintain high volume of trades without breakdowns.
Is your position that maybe he was trying to manipulate the market 11 years ago or more like today? I have invested pretty hard into BTC and MTSR over the past 5 years. I don't jump in blindly into any investment and do a shit ton of my own research. I am not quite sure why there is so much fear over Saylor. If you look into his background and history, he is a straight shooter and also a brilliant mind. He originally thought BTC was a fad and had little to no value. But after his own deep dive, he changed his POV and now is one of the biggest advocates that both BTC and MSTR have.
The Alt season has started, yesterday you had literally a live POV of how alts move despite BTC falling. Get your bags ready
I work as a KYC analyst at s bank, so I kind od know how this works. Due to this cryptoboom I think they have just too many people to rewiev and it just takes very long. From your POV it takes ages from their PoV weeks fly by like nothing. I know this might be frustrating but I would remain hopeful. 🤞