Reddit Posts
Quick Summary of Crypto Legislations Movement in the House This Week
A NO tax coin to lead the revolution. $Anarchy is just under a week old and has been on a tear. Currently sitting a 1M MC. Don’t ask what the dev can do for you, ask what you would do as the dev!
Stellar and Stellar USDC is going to thrive
Downvote expected: In the correct NFT space with research and a lot of trial and error beforehand, there are SIGNIFICANT returns to be had.
Is ApeCoin DAO is doomed to fail by design?...
Mentions
>They need to scan people’s eyeballs to get raw biometric data first, right? Unless they invented the scanning machine themselves, which I highly doubt Why are we making assumptions when information is so easily accessible online? You could have learned how their machine works in less time it took you to write this comment. Yes lol. They invented the machine themselves, using all custom hardware and unlimited money in RD from their AI ventures, "minimal compromises" they've claimed. The machine aka Orb is their entire "genius", the only thing that makes WorldID feasible. Only everyone would rather make assumptions than learn how a new machine works, so it's DOA regardless if they've perfected their machine or not. > those scanned metrics have to be stored as some kind of data files somewhere, before they get encrypted by whatever algorithms they use to become zk signatures. Well, I don't have an Orb here to audit myself but they're not supposed to be storing anything without explicit consent (which is another can of worms, but I'll assume most people don't want to be doxxed.) To my knowledge their Orb works as a random seed generator, which stops generating once it detects a unique face, producing a unique seed for every unique person. The Orb tech is there to determine if the person is unique, a photograph, or something else all together, using entropy, which is a highly complex task and done locally. Once high enough entropy has been detected the generator stops, your keys are combined with this entropy, and at this point all images are deleted before you walk away with your new private key. Nothing in the tech *necessitates* the storage of images or biometrics, any more than your seed phrase doesn't need to be stored on a blockchain for you to use it. I don't trust these people either, but for academic purposes I'm still intrigued enough to take them at their word - the scandal would be incredible otherwise, and would spur global AI anti-trust laws which I'm sure Sam doesn't want to happen. >Yes, you can’t tell from the signature if signature A is John or Joe, but those raw biometrics data may be traceable. You can't, though. If I show you an Ethereum transaction it doesn't tell you my name, because I've never associated my name with my accounts publically before. If you had a list of all Worldcoin signatures, you'd still know nothing other than you hold a bunch of unique keys presumably that came from unique people. It's not required to offer information use the machine in the first place. Your Orb signature isn't applicable in any other application, and doesn't describe your iris or how you look, it just means you were able to stop the Orb's random seed generator long enough to take out a seed, so if that leaks *zero knowledge* gets out. Is the entropy *you used* to generate your BTC seed traceable back to your machine and to you yourself? High entropy is noise to put it simply. It really shouldn't be, with enough entropy, that's the entire point in using entropy to begin with and why we don't make seed phrases by ourselves. >Those files may be hacked by government organized hacker groups. Frankly, do we really know what goes behind the scene? Will they really do what they are claimed to do? How do we know for sure they will not hand those biometric data to governments? Sorry, I don’t think anyone knows. Those files may be voluntary handed to governments for all I know. It's already a scandal, how much worse can it get? Like I said I haven't audited the machine myself, only going off others who have plus the official documentation. This is basically the crux in my original post. "I don't think anyone knows" how ZK encryption works, so when Ethereum turns its EVM into a ZKEVM and people deploy ZKBTC people are going to say, "I don't think anyone knows how it works. Those transactions may be hacked by government organized hacker groups. Do we know what goes on behind the scenes? Will they really do what they claimed to do? How do we know?" and then what? We've cryptographically come full circle back to trust me bro, looking at a black box, and I don't know how we get beyond that intact. I could care less about Sam Altman and his boring AI dystopia, but I would like to see the L1's scale, and the only way that seems it could work is through ZK, so, fuck.
This statement just slapped me right across the face in the best way possible. The coin is DOA when you look at it this way. Great advice to protect and check yourself before hitting that buy button.
Blockchain gaming is DOA and will never bear enjoyable games. You will only hear from people, who want to make money about the good things about these "games". Guess what: no one else wants that no one really wants games with real money incentives, micro trandactions, pay2win. Can we please move on?
A further perfect reaosn why tokenized stocks will never take over. "Experts" like you are the proponents. If you think you're such a smart guy with a great plan, go raise a bunch of money and start a company to disrupt the industry. First, you wouldn't do the work. Second, you couldn't raise money because anyone with wealth knows this idea is DOA. The stock market is already easily and cheaply accessible to poor people too.
Is Litecoin mweb still difficult as fuck for a normal user to use? It’s truly one of the most depressing things about this coin, a feature that was so promising only to turn out to be DOA
No need to be an a hole.. For the record any smart phone already 'harvests' your biometric data. It's not hard to imagine any new technology being dystopian, in the end that fear is typically not warranted. For example we use public blockchains, imagine if that's all we had for all finance, terrible. If their open-source decentralized orb starts to harvest biometric data then don't use it. I can't imagine a future where this became mandatory in any free nation, most people won't use this tech as is on a volunteer basis. This isn't being run with a privacy policy, it is meant to be decentralized and distributed tech so whenever it's not or comes with a policy don't trust it because it's not the same product - it's like worrying Bitcoin's privacy policy will update some day, it should never be possible to achieve what you're worried about. There's little reason to harvest biometric data with this technology. As long as it can produce a unique identifier from high entropy that's seemingly better (more valuable) than (low entropy) biometrics which can be easily faked (and which defeats the *entire* purpose of World ID). Any network with millions/billions of *people* is going to be immensely valuable without touching biometrics. Using Reddit for example, the conjecture is Reddit *without bots* would be more valuable as bots become more prevelant, so Spez or Reddit's shareholders may pay lots for this service (login with WorldID) to rid bots from the site. If you believe most people won't care, why not start the scheme with biometrics? It would be orders of magnitude easier if people could use their own smart phone. Why spend all the money inventing a process that works without biometrics if in the end they're conceding back on it, throwing their 100 million of R&D in the trash, only to use a more obsolete tech? It doesn't make sense. I agree it's far more likely governments or third parties harvest your data than the Orb, ie the security camera in front of the Orb building will know who you are regardless of the Orb does. It's good not to trust any person you don't know, that's fine. I'm not suggesting to do that either. In the end we'll still need to trust the ZK compiler which I doubt more than 0.000001% of people could realistically audit. Like I said this whole scheme is DOA until/unless it becomes absolutely necessary (which I believe it may, some day, in the face of self replicating(wormy) AI agents). The future is bold so we need bold solutions to deal with it. It seems that either non-government ID or government ID's are the only two that could work to solve this problem, while most of the world doesn't have access to government ID's and imo governments are never better than a decentralized alternative - unless you have a better idea to prove our humanity (without biometrics or permission), or you believe AI should hold governance rights over themselves and democracy, then yeah this WorldID thing is totally dumb. Social graphs are the better solution but they don't scale well unfortunately. Maybe in 10-20-30 years that's what we'll use instead to prove humanity, but today they are so small they'll never work out before we need them. This is a problem for 2040 more than 2020, it'll make a lot more sense to weigh the pros/cons of each potential solution once we have AI showing us what happens if we continue to do nothing at all.
So I do have some answers on this that I think can help clear some stuff up! The NDAA (National Defense Authorization Act) has been passed in both the House and the Senate. The House version did not have this language it was added by the Senate and the House Leadership has made one thing extremely clear this Congress... if it does not deal with military spending they will not accept it. This crypto amendment is DOA in the House so really there is no need to worry about that. ​ The Curve hack is more interesting esp because a couple of days ago there was news about reentry attacks. Committee passed a bill sending it to the House Floor that would codify the right for people to have self custody wallets (it's the Keep Your Coins Act of 2023 btw). ​ The Curve hack is more interesting esp because a couple of days ago there was news about Reentrancy Attacks that I think I was emailed but I cannot find the article anymore. That could easily be the Lazarus Group because they have been behind the large complex attacks in the past and honestly haven't really had a breaking news one recently. ​ It might seem like there is a lot of shady or negative stuff right now but really in the last week, we have had huge huge wins in Congress for crypto. Getting bipartisan support on 3 out of the four bills in the House Financial Services Committee is huge going forward and means that this legislation could pass. The Senators who proposed all of this limiting stuff (Elizabeth Warren) won't win out in the long run because it gives them a huge target on their back for an election year. Right now there is a good chance that the Senate flips and with crypto becoming something that more and more people are considering in their elected Members destroying bipartisanship just is a bad move.
People complain about the Ethereum DOA hack and subsequent fork. But Satoshi did similar stuff with Bitcoin in the early days.
Nano did not have a decentralized distribution. Nano Foundation received Nano in a unique way that was not available to the general public. (Being given Nano without using the captcha). That is a big deal and a huge reason Nano is DOA.
Oh that's DOA for them but the xrp case had made a ripple in cryptohistory and will be used in all sorts of arguements
Why ship every when it can almost always be used locally? It's simply unnecessary with proper logistics. I either case, no one ever mentioned hydrogen except for hydrogen fuel cell vehicles, which are DOA due to the issues I previously mentioned.
There's also just a bunch of platforms that don't trigger the resale payments in the first place. So yeah, the whole 'perpetual resale percentage' thing is kinda DOA at this point.
Brics is DOA. Just an attempt by antidemocratic countries at making their dictators some money and fame...
The are a Governance token you can hold them and delegate to a DOA for voting power .. when they did the air drop their was a tutorial on how to do it ..
What about no airdrop, no liquidity mining, and only 7% of the supply going to public sale. Also, public sale prices were 3x insider prices. No airdrop is whatever, but giving 80%of the supply to the team and VC's means the network will never decentralize and it's probably DOA.
Anything that has to define it’s identity by something else is DOA
I called meta verse DOA dead idea 3 years ago. Nobody is putting on ve head sets to go into meetings and virtual worlds so they can live out there dream of being Xbox 360 avatars.
That doesn't answer my question. They can write as many "acts" and "laws" as they want, it won't stop people from doing as they please anyway. For example: look at how unsuccessful the prohibition of alcohol was, and how ineffective the current laws making drugs illegal are as well. If there's not a central company, person, or server that they can focus their leverage on and force into compliance then their laws are all DOA.
Shouldn't ever be the case of a DAO right? It's the community that dictates what happens via voting. When the dev team goes against the results anyways, the DOA has failed. If I was in that project, I'd have bailed immediately to recoup whatever I could.
DCMA does CBDC while SEC and CFTC compete. We continue to DCA into BTC and ETH while SBF and FTX deal with scrutiny from the DOJ. FUD is massive and EOY is fuzzy with the IMF. So many factors, so DYOR and remember NYKNYC otherwise your money’s FUBAR and DOA 🫣it hurt my brain writing this🫣we have a complicated world🫣
I work for mining syndicate. I transport units to hosting sites when we complete testing on them in Dallas Texas. We have found its way safer then just shipping them on a pallet. So far I have done 3 moves with the foam (last pic) and we have arrived with 100+ units with 0 DOA. Vs pallet we get a few DOAs. Do you have units your self?
Yeah, guy, lets not. The FTX reputation is shattered beyond repair, it would just be a waste of time/energy/money to try and trudge forward after EVERYTHING thats happened. FTX was FUBAR. Post-SBF FTX is DOA
I think all 3 of these are dead, with the caveat that the bird coin was DOA.
I have thought of this basic concept as well, just a decentralized dating app A dating app for cryptobros sounds DOA
Was DOA - Was always a way of bridging Bitcoin's monetary policy with the current financial system. The current financial system is broken. KYC could not have the longevity many thing it does. It goes against Bitcoin's ethos, and even much of the functionality it offers (but users use wallets running on decade-old technology stacks that don't take advantage of said advancements).
An android flavored Solana mobile phone? Wow, this will be DOA mark my words. It's too niche, mass production is out of question, so price will be probably too high to justify the value.
Same here. Do you remember when the DOA got hacked and ETH fell 50% from $20 to $10? I only bought because this happened. $20 ETH was too expensive.
I somehow don't see any Republicans, voting for that bill.. I'd say its DOA.
Bill is DOA, this will never get through the house.
fortunately his party lost the house, so this nonsense should be DOA in congress.
After watching all of the projects that want to be eth killers and the number of developers flocking to those projects, its no surprise Pulse is DOA. No good talent is going to want to work for a carnival barker. Pulsechain was just the second step in Heart's scam. He's an educated scammer and he knew Hex could only drag on for so long. Always have the next trick up your sleeve. No surprise here.
Because while maxis are now out to lunch, there was a time when their arguments were mostly right. In many ways, they still are. - Hash power was always the deciding factor over "the real" Bitcoin. The dishonest tactics to confuse the branding and support a sociopath (CW) is an extreme turnoff. As a non dev, I put alot of import on secondary social cues and red flags. It was too much to ignore. - You really do want to maximize decentralization of nodes as much as *practicable*. Bitcoin unfortunately overdesigned for node decentralization, but it has a shit mining ecosystem. ASICs are the #1 thing that ruined it, and crypto. But all the forks have the exact same problem. - Lightning Network is intuitively a good idea. Yes it suffers from problems, but it's still *minimally viable*. And it can offload a significant amount of scaling that's simply not possible on mainchain. Again though, without dynamic blocks, it's DOA. Finally, I don't *hate* the forks. At the time I did, but I hated the liars associated with it more than anything. These days however, if you want a non abomination, the forks are absolutely still an abomination. - 1 CPU 1 vote. Oops - Massively centralized supply as a result of ASICs - Unaudited spaghetti code with no bug bounties - No default privacy - Manually adjusted blocksize instead of intelligently, automatically adjusting blocks - Arcane scripting which degrades fungibility and use as money, while not being good at contracts like Eth You want the real Bitcoin? It's called Monero. Effective, digital cash. You want advanced functions, creative layer 2 constructions? It's Eth. That's where the world is moving. Bitcoin is going to be left behind in the coming years. All the Bitcoins.
CBDC is DOA, anything in the know will just transfer over to less risky (controlled) assets.
So no one told you life was gonna be this way Your NFT's a joke, you're broke Your portfolio's DOA...
DAO needs to slasho in order not end up DOA.
I agree 💯 The issue is if you create a business to do it, then you are responsible. So they never should have created a tornado cash DOA and had a governance coin. If they said this is the white paper and the code anyone can deploy it. Then it would be impossible to prosecute the devs. But i think in this case it is still fair.
Nothing can be done about the whales, even if we had a completely decentralized system, whales would still control it. DOA's can be bought just as easily as politicians so decentralized control is just giving it to the whales with the most money. However regulation can make CEXs not be involved in shady behaviour. It can make it easier to recover funds from hackers and international cooperation can help with tracing, arresting and punishing hackers and scammers. Regulation will force law enforcement to actually come up with crypto divisions to become more proficient at tracing criminal behaviour. So while regulation doesn't mean anything to the whales, it is good for your average retail investor.
Can we stop posting this shit? Every other week some clown politician "pushes a bill" that doesn't even get to votes becaues it's so DOA. Stop celebrating their political theater, you are being used.
Your hope does you credit. I don't think you are right, because of currently vested interests as much as anything else. But I have enjoyed the exchange. NFT is DOA 😉
I'm nobody, but was mentioning for many months on the Harmony forum the 1) Unfixed RPC issue 2) 80% TVL locked in 1 platform 3) DFK hack, which DFK knew about the vulnerability for months 4) ONE can shard! Yet they never had more than 1 shard ever running so who knows if it could do what it said it could do 5) then the DOA stuff 6) Then the NFT and big party expense Stuff 7) DeVinchi site drama ... some of this wasn't Harmony team, but it all starts to stack up over time. Then, Harmony gets hacked from a vulnerability that they were told was a potential risk months prior, I mean, come on didn't they learn anything from DFK! Now the fix to the hack. Clown show. 🤡 Come on man, I'm not creative enough to make all this mess up lol.
Ok makes sense thanks I don't consider the DOA hacked would have crippled ETH - the ETH founders invested and enough people with the power to force the change was effected. So they made a stupid poll and did the HF.
CKB Nervos Network thought about this and implemented upon inception. Primary issuance is capped like BTC. secondary issuance every year goes to miners, dao holders and treasury. DOA holders are protected from inflation and effectively hard cap their holdings. Miners are incentivized to secure the network long after primary issuance is fully realeased.
We'd phase out our Chinese ASICs for Korean in a heartbeat. I'm concerned about supply-chain reliability with China. Chinese ASICs don't follow any standards, random MAC addresses, high DOA rate, dangerous shipping methods (~7000lbs on 1/8" plyboard skid), and who knows if what you're getting is legit. Taiwan units are better, China mainland is all over the place. I also doubt their advertised capablility, especially on energy consumption.
It might help eth but there is nothing in it for the vested interests they would be trying to replace. And the system is poorly suited to such a use. Typo's are very common in dtaa entey, a system where it costs singificant money to amend typos is already DOA. There is nothing thay strongly links a person to a wallet. There would need to be some way to restore a wallet to a person for the credentials and laws needed to link a person and wallet. It's missing technical and legislative pieces. It's the same effort as trying to get all the vested interests to use one database with government authority with no gain on top of that. It wouldn't happen for the same reasons there isn't a unified system now.
GME is DOA, waaay tooo late to the game.
>you are less secure by using a database and server that can get hacked or compromised rather than smart contracts on the blockchain Code being on a blockchain does not make it inherently more secure than any other code. I would argue that it actually makes it less secure, as it costs significantly more to patch bugs on the blockchain than a centralized server. ​ An example of a code failure on the blockchain would be the ethereum DOA attack a few years ago.
Lmao DOA instead of DCA
But that's DAO, not DOA.
Said the same fuckin people who want to regulate a DOA as an entity. Are you kidding?
I was one those people who initially misunderstood the Solend situation. But Solend/Solana situation and DAO/ethereum hack are similar in that an entity built on top od the chain was the problem. Solend and the DOA just happened to be very players that posed a risk to underlying chain due their relative size. The underlying chains were not hacked. If I understand the harmony situation (I could easily be wrong), what got hacked was a bridge protocol that harming actually controller
Vagisil upgrade DOA
NFT, DOA and DEFI were the 3 main buzz words during the last bull market. What will be the 3 buzz words during the next bull market?
> The tools are there for anyone who want to use bitcoin/lightning in a sovereign way, but most users (for the foreseeable future anyways) are going to do it in a centralized/custodial way. If Lightning ends up as something people just use through centralized exchanges then its literally pointless. You can already trade bitcoin off-chain through a centralized exchange. Exchanges can already bundle off-chain transactions to amortize their on-chain cost, and they don't have to deal with all the limitations of Lightning to do so. >Ultimately all lightning channels are bitcoin transactions, and thus are trust-minimized. Even if you open a channel with a malicious actor and they try to fraudulently post an incorrect channel state to steal some of your funds None of this applies when you're talking about relying on a 3rd party to run a node on your behalf. It's just as trustful as trusting them to run an SQL database. >Also, your chart on the number of lightning nodes doesn't show what you want it to. For one, it's only showing public nodes and not private nodes A private node isn't using the network. if you set up a private node you can't transact with anyone else on the network apart from the one node you connected to, it does not contribute to the routing capacity of the network. It does not represent growth of the network. >It shows exponential growth in the number of public nodes up until two months ago It's not the kind of exponential growth a payment network needs to see for it to have any hope of being a mainstream payment option. At this stage in a payment networks lifespan it should be adding hundreds of thousands of users a day. Even if it was adding 17,000 every day (not every 4 years), it would still take 161 years for it to grow as big as Visa. If this was any other fintech payment network people would be calling it DOA with that little growth in such a long time. It's only blockchain magic that has people put faith in an obviously failed project. >Fees have also been low for about a year now, so there is no real incentive for the average bitcoin user to not use on-chain payments when withdrawing to their own wallet or another exchange We hit $60 average fees last year. If that's not enough to start a mass migration to Lighting, time to face its not going to happen. If you think averages fees need to be consistently >$60 for Lightning to grow then its never going to grow. Imagine how successful PayPal would have been if you needed to put $10 to deposit money and $10 to withdraw money. PayPal were straight up giving people money to open a paypal account when they first started, that's how important network effects are. >It needs to be a reliable store of value before people will want to use it as a medium of exchange on a large scale. This might take another halving cycle or two Well then lightning is in trouble because an asset with 0 supply elasticity can never become price stable unless somehow demand perfectly matches supply and halves every 3.9 ish years, which obviously it never will because economies are constantly fluctuating in their demand for currency. Demand for Bitcoin is demand for speculative gain. When price is rising demand rises, when price falls demand falls. It is doomed to speculative boom and bust until the security model deathspirals.
Ahh remembering THE DOA days
What's DOA? Can you please explain a bit more to me?
Ahem, let me fix that title for you. "A bill that is DOA 1000% and has 0 chance of ever passing wants to distract you from Congress member's insider trading stock portfolios and donor bribes by asking them for data they will never provide and that is also easily concealable is posted to a subreddit for karma and distraction." There you go.
Safemoon is DOA 2023...provided they even make it out of 2022 Possibly SHIB Seeing THETA holders is like watching a slow hanging. Strongblock both $LUNA FTM
If there's a run and USDT loses its peg and can't recover....prices of all crypto would go down significantly, BTC included. A lot of coins, especially shitcoins, ONLY trade against USDT...those coins would be DOA. The entire crypto space would shed billions, maybe in the hundreds. This can plausibly happen with any stablecoin, USDC & DAU etc. etc. but these coins are not under the massive scrutiny that USDT is...whether deservedly or undeservedly is up for much debate. But I digress
So no one told you life was gonna be this way…Your job’s a joke, you’re broke, your love life’s DOA
Interesting, I thought the DOA hack was the most engaging part! The last third felt more slow to me with the foundation/Ming drama.
It's called the DOA hack that bullshit
DOA = Dead on arrival
Not smart to hold 2 DOA projects, no.
You mean a job? Haha, ok. If they aren't paying out what I can earn already, I could literally have a regular job with benefits and still buy the same amount at the end of the day, and it would be steady, doing the same thing every day. The investments would appreciate the same. I have more control of what coin's I receive. Being an expert in one field, even if that field is just general personal assistant, is highly more likely to pay out more than doing small bit's of the same job here or there. This idea is DOA, it's about as useful as any other gimmick site on /r/beermoney . Good for a couple bucks, not a serious stream of income, and less profitable than just getting a hobby you actually enjoy that can make 10 bucks on a saturday afternoon - name literally anything that makes you happy and you can probably figure out how to make $100-$200 of crypto a year doing it.
DCA or DOA, there is no other way.
>lifespans(gpu) DOA to atleast 30+ years
buy gpu's , deduct those on your taxes and used electricity too, give the taxman manufacturers specs of used wattage and then lower power target to 50-60% and get tax deduction on your whole electricity bill. free energy , yo! if the gpu fails theres warranty and most likely it won't fail unless it's already DOA. mining is less demanding than running demanding games.
So you are calling for a pump and dump scheme, what might be a federal crime depending on where you live, to help people who lost money during a dump to get some money back? Might be better to create a DOA
If one of the top ten can collapse in 36 hours utterly fucking countless individuals. Why exactly do you believe that there’s NO WAY the same could play out for tether ? Crypto will for all intention purposes be DOA when that happens . Sure some people will continue to trade beanie babies much like they do today but no one will care . The UST folks aren’t crying their eyes out over the fact that their technology will not be adopted .
Luna is DOA Nothing is going to revive it. More to follow soon.
All Tether FUD is DOA since 9/28/21
So no one told you crypto was gonna be this way Your job's a joke, you're broke Your memecoins DOA It's like you're always stuck in second gear When it hasn't been your day, your week, your month, Or even your year, but I'll be there for you (When the rain starts to pour) I'll be there for you (Like I've been there before) I'll be there for you (until i'v hit max karma score)
Yeah like I said, developing novel technology doesn't always go as planned. The smart contract blockchain space is full is failed deadlines but yeah man, if you want to keep counting your chickens before they hatch that's all you. I'll just watch the game play out. If it's truly DOA then the on-chain data is in direct opposition to that supposed fact
The roadmap has changed dramatically over the last two years. Go back and listen: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Ja9D0kpksxw Then look at how much never happened (or how much that did, in the case of a small number of entities controlling protocol development) >Is very premature to call it dead on arrival when it hasn't arrived. I didn't say it will be DOA. It was DOA. Their story keeps changing and nobody wants to hold them accountable. Good luck, but I don't see any useful developments coming out of IOHK. They've consistently failed to deliver what they said could be done, and that was for a roadmap that had lots of research papers with a few big holes. The rest of their roadmap has very little published research, and we haven't even seen a spec for the next hard fork. We have no idea what's really in it, technically.
Just to temper expectations, there has never been a successful Algo backed stable (ust is only surving as long as Do Kwan wants to subsidize it, and he's starting to balk and back it with Bitcoin), so while it's nice development is happening on ada. I'd call this a nothing burger and don't fomo in on a likely DOA project.
There are more DOA posts on the ledger sub every day. Get a Trezor.
Gavin wood messed up a pretty big DOA as an eth dev.
It can still easily recover though if ACM have one good competition or major signing in my opinion. Look at the [GOZ token price](https://rocketfan.com/ft/GOZ) based simply on a rumor (from $0.90 and DOA on March 20, to alive and kicking at $3.99 by March 27). Thats a 3x in one week.
If you installed a new card and now the Mobo won't even post then I'd assume the card is DOA. Can you test just the new card in a different PC? Also, might get more help in the crypto mining subreddit. Not that you're not free to post here obv just mentioning.
Post is by: scott32089 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoCurrency/comments/u5datl/downvote_expected_in_the_correct_nft_space_with/ There is a sucker born every minute, and there are a LOT of projects that are DOA across all chains. My experience however, and unabashedly only in the Cardano space (shilling, y’all are missing out), is that with the right research into projects and a solid exit strategy and luck, there are a lot of returns that will make your 10-100% token returns look like a wasted opportunity. My strategy is to mint 3. Ride the hype, pull out investment and keep the ball rolling. Have had a couple lucky hits that are an immediate 20-30x investment. Trick is to take that money and be happy with that profit. Maybe reinvest into the floor for further possible future returns. If not, you’re already in “house money.” A number more the floor price bottomed out the day after drop, but over the course of a month+ has seen the floor move to 5-20x mint price. ALWAYS MINT if you can. Check the community engagement on twitter and discord, see how the project is set up, and what the white paper and roadmaps tell you. Are they realistic? Does the team have the capability to see the project to actual fruition? Etc… Rule #1 is to TAKE YOUR INITIAL INVESTMENT OUT! Could have you made more later? Maybe. Could the project flatline at the bottom after the hype dies in a couple days. WAY more likely. Find some fun money, find a chain with *low transaction costs* and maybe you can turn your coins/tokens into more than just watching the super exciting daily 5-10% returns. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoCurrency) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Unfortunately no big name brand wants this. DOA
I don't have an exchange to buy Montero off. Kraken took it off ages ago which leaves me DOA. I'll keep mining but GL to the rest of you guys
Harmony is a good example. I think it was a Binance IEO not “labs” but they took a massive stake at launch, staked and monopolized the market for like 2 years and there are rumors they just dump on the market constantly since they unstated. They also turn the wallet off constantly. If the get ahold of a project it’s DOA.
Can’t wait for the nuclear DOA to come out
DOA, a 475f election only works if you have a trader status. Hardly anyone qualifies for that. Plus, can’t discriminate capital assets.
> It s like you say I can't form an informed opinion at least you can admit you dont know what you're talking about. >If I was a ripple investor I would suggest ripple to simply give up. Buying XRP isnt an investment in Ripple... You can buy Ripple stock on linqto (not sure of spelling) >Actions that no other cryptocurrency took because ripple is a different centralized animal. XRP is agnostic, it didnt take any actions. Ripple is a company not a DOA so obviously it is centralized.... Ripple =/= XRP.