CL

BunsMcCheeks

In a couple hours Mango will be like "🫲Frankly🫱 there is no deal, they tried to whack Ivanka" and it will be timed perfecly coincide with CL gap filling. Funny how that always works

RandomRocketScience

ES1 partying like the war is over at 7556 (almost up 1%), CL1 crashing to 91 (down almost 6%). Market certainly seems to think the war is over. Im not so sure.

Weekly_One8412

A problem I see with shorting USO in particular is that it’s not solely based on global oil prices. If you noticed when trump visited china, china said they will buy more oil from the US. This caused USO to pump 5% while CL and BZ dumped 1%. So it’s not a 1-1 correlation…

AgentBlackwell

CL isnt it rn

Delicious_Put_5857

>RUBIO: TOLLING SYSTEM IN STRAIT OF HORMUZ WOULD MAKE DIPLOMATIC DEAL UNFEASIBLE no worries just short more CL

Mot1on

Long CL!

Smallestsak

you are not the contrarian opinion though. Retail is slamming shorts on /CL because of the taco trade. You’re not a lone contrarian with smart money. You’re just doing the same thing all taco speculators are and it’s going to blow up because there’s no taco.

krisko11

Oil regaining. Doubt we’ll eat TACO on Tuesday july CL below 100 by Wednesday tho

Delicious_Put_5857

the government uses 100 million barrels of the SPR to suppress the price of CL futures: this is good and im a genius the stock market goes down 0.4%: this is bullshit algo manipulation the likes of which we have never seen

ModeForJoe

CL futes crashing, but apparently on nothing more than "peace talks" through pakistan and to... nowhere? ¯\\\_(ツ)\_/¯

eugenekasha

It’s due to a roll over to the new CL contract that is in contango

Inside-Arm8635

CL is still under $100…what do you mean “should have” lol

azboy

There's 1 set of European options on CL, code LCE: https://www.cmegroup.com/markets/energy/crude-oil/light-sweet-crude.html#optionProductId=1353

CHL9

Any insight into whether any of these are european? CL GC SI NG ZB ZN 6J 6E? Or the specifics of which ES NQ RTY expiries are NOT european?

OurNewestMember

This sounds on track. I think RTY works like ES and NQ where the quarterlies are American style. CME has some fun confusing documentation for interest rate products where they describe "American style" options separately from half a dozen other kinds of listings even though the others are also American style, lol https://www.cmegroup.com/markets/interest-rates/us-treasury/10-year-us-treasury-note.contractSpecs.options.html#optionProductId=317 Looks like there are interesting cases, too, like where CL options are American style but MCL has European style options. TBH, I just look at the chain to quickly check for American vs European style

CHL9

Thank you very much for your reply, appreciate it. Do you perhaps have a specific URL or other way (I'm on ToS) to check the CME spec per contract? I have only find general information on their site. I'm trying to ascertain if ALL of the CL, GC, SI, NG, ZN/B/F, 6J \*options\* are American-style, or if there are some expirations which are in fact European-style. The only ones I've been able to ascertain with certainty are ES and NQ, which are only European on the quarterlies, and I read RTY is only European. It's counterintuitive that this is not easily found published information on CME or the brokerage or anywhere.

CHL9

Thank you very much for your reply, appreciate it. Do you perhaps have a specific URL or other way (I'm on ToS) to check the CME spec per contract? I have only find general information on their site. I'm trying to ascertain if ALL of the CL, GC, SI, NG, ZN/B/F, 6J \*options\* are American-style, or if there are some expirations which are in fact European-style. The only ones I've been able to ascertain with certainty are ES and NQ, which are only European on the quarterlies, and I read RTY is only European. It's counterintuitive that this is not easily found published information on CME or the brokerage or anywhere.

CHL9

Thank you very much for your reply, appreciate it. Do you perhaps have a specific URL or other way (I'm on ToS) to check the CME spec per contract? I have only find general information on their site. I'm trying to ascertain if ALL of the CL, GC, SI, NG, ZN/B/F, 6J \*options\* are American-style, or if there are some expirations which are in fact European-style. The only ones I've been able to ascertain with certainty are ES and NQ, which are only European on the quarterlies, and I read RTY is only European.

Perfect-Loquat-7791

Not quite true, most CME futures *options* on CL, GC, SI, NG are actually American-style (early exercise possible), while “European-style” is more common in index options like SPX/SPXW. Always check the CME spec per contract. Confusion is normal here.

Accurate_Shift_3118

In all honesty, CME documentation related to exercise style tends to be oddly inconsistent. I had to check this for myself when running derivatives workflows on Runable because certain brokers’/documentation sites’ terminology differs. As far as I recall, the majority of conventional commodity-based futures options (CL/GC/SI/NG) are American-style, whereas the exercise style of index products depends on their expiry terms.

kodaksdad2020

Every time I think about going long CL again there’s a massive one hour move and I realize it’s untouchable

tesseramous

Also ibkr here. I have 20/5 access to SPX and 23/5 access to any futures options like ES, CL (oil), SI (silver) and BRR (bitcoin)

Delicious_Put_5857

me think market has been operating on major hopium of taco/resolution + active suppression of CL by US and japan. so its less freaking out, more just that reality is briefly undeniable and price is moving back towards fair value.

skyplt29

I sold a bunch of my Tilray shares two weeks ago for just under 8USD once it became clear the DOJ medical S3 ruling was another STN (sell the news) event. I held on too long after the EO on 18 Dec and did not want to repeat that mistake. Intent was to buy it all back at some point and right now under 6USD is enticing...BUT I think I have finally come to realize Tilray is not going to turnaround, or at least to the level I see some of the MSOs potentially achieving. I have come to the conclusion that Irwin Simon has diluted one too many times and there is just too much negative sentiment after that ill-timed reverse split on Thanksgiving (quite the turkey). Thinking it is time to buy some MSOs beyond CL. Tempted on Trulieve, but am cautious about Florida; will there be competition and price compression? Also thinking about buying some GTI. I listened to the conference call; impressive. Has Charlotte's Web run its course? I regret not jumping into it earlier when GeoLogic suggested .13CAD was a bargain. I note BAT exchanged debt for shares at .94CAD but CWEB is presently trading at .63 (it experienced some significant recent declines off of mid .80s). I am disappointed in Tilray, and perhaps more in myself for falling in love with a company and not letting go of the denial aspects of admitting (to myself) I made a mistake. I've been in and out of Tilray since it was Aphria. Now looking to recoup some major losses in other weedstocks. Recommendations?

BroChochOooo

I sold at 12.94 All yours, I can’t take the chance so I’ll be on the sidelines. I hope they CL. Green thumb and trul. Do amazing over the next few days.

Sufficient_Nose629

# Top Holdings Subject to change. # Fund Top Holdings as of May 04 2026 |**Name**|**Shares Held**|**Weight**| |:-|:-|:-| |NVIDIA CORP|289,213,915|7.82%| |APPLE INC|174,731,313|6.59%| |MICROSOFT CORP|88,377,097|4.98%| |[AMAZON.COM](http://AMAZON.COM) INC|116,263,007|4.31%| |ALPHABET INC CL A|69,289,784|3.62%| |BROADCOM INC|56,427,238|3.20%| |ALPHABET INC CL C|55,670,678|2.88%| |META PLATFORMS INC CLASS A|26,036,007|2.16%| |TESLA INC|33,479,922|1.79%| |BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CL B|21,829,549|1.39%|

cantgetthistowork

Treasury conditions for letting BOJ intervention slide was if they slammed CL together with USDJPY. That's why oil is capped.

Ok-Piano8789

its more like, CL traders trying to figure out whether the US federal government will allow the price to go up today

Poptart_Salad

CL trying real hard to figure out if merchant vessels being fired upon, US Navy being fired at, and UAE activating missile defense is bullish or not.

SlartibartfastMcGee

Holding a standing limit sell on CL @ $105 has been free fucking money for the past month. Remember the ABC’s: Always Be shorting Crude

version-two

Long CL and long ES here. No reason they can’t go to the moon together these days

Delicious_Put_5857

well yeah we know the govt is draining the SPR to suppress front month CL

StarMaker7

CL makes me nervous. I never know what to expect from them around Earnings... But with GTI, I expect a great report and conference call, positive for SP. Yes, I'm biased when it comes to Greenthumb. lol

BroChochOooo

Thoughts on upcoming CL and GTI financials ?

Choice_Potato_6279

What's CL? I'm using CFD

Boss1010

on /CL?

Opposite_Day_9771

June futures for international benchmark [Brent](https://www.cnbc.com/quotes/@LCO.1/) crude rose 6.84% to $126.10 a barrel as of 12:22 a.m. ET, while U.S. [West Texas Intermediate](https://www.cnbc.com/quotes/@CL.1/) added 3.14% to $110.24. US going to attack soon with three air craft carriers. The administration can't keep secrets so insiders are already buying.

cantgetthistowork

Something's going to snap either CL or SPX

playstationjeans

BE BLOOM ENERGY CORP INTC INTEL CORP COM LITE LUMENTUM HLDG VIAV VIAVI SOLUTIONS MRVL MARVELL TECHN GOOG ALPHABET INC C PWR QUANTA SERVICE AVGO BROADCOM INC NBIS NEBIUS GROUP N CIEN CIENA CORP COHR COHERENT CORP NVT NVENT ELECTRIC ANET ARISTA NETWORK MU MICRON CAT CATERPILLAR POWL POWELL INDUSTRIES LFUS LITTLEFUSE LWLG LIGHTWAVE LOGI (Gambling) AMKR AMKOR TECHNO CAT CATERPILLAR INC VRT VERTIV HOLDING DLR DIGITAL REALTY T KRKNF KRAKEN ROBOTIC LRCX LAM RESEARCH C GLW CORNING INC CCJ CAMECO CORP C GEV GE VERNOVA INC TER TERADYNE INC CL

Hot-Pop-3250

I think that CL will tank when JP reiterates that they can't do a damn thing about it I'm not betting on it though

Oxidrox

Calls on PSG winning the CL, Arsenal sure as hell aint beating them.

Delicious_Put_5857

we've never had the federal government deliberately suppress CL futures by draining the SPR

Provolone-Jones

Going full port on June CL futures after getting smoked by the huge drop in the May CL futures and using the margin from the unrealized profits to buy O&G producer stocks might prove to be the smartest thing I’ve ever done

SighRamp

CL still under 102 was rejected again prior to open not a bear market just trading in range until FOMC thru big earnings after market close tomorrow.

SighRamp

key CL 102 rejection premarket won't be bearish until that breaks and clearly holds

hyper24x7

short on MCL, long on CL. No stops. Just a wild ride to profit baby.

Significant_Speed854

8:58pm, Axios posts an article. Check the volume on ES and CL at 8:58 pm you fucking idiot.

version-two

Hmmm.. so long CL futes at open?

ModeForJoe

/CL ...lol

Significant_Speed854

Always my fear when pressing sell on ES or long on CL

YOLOdollhair

This weekend's news... WITKOFF AND KUSHNER FORGOT TO PACK THEIR TOOTHPASTE, DELEGATION TURNS AROUND \-FINANCIAL TIMES Market down -0.02% Followed by Sunday night... DELEGATION BOUND FOR IRAN WITH READY SUPPLY OF COLGATE TRIPLE ACTION MINT \-FINANCIAL TIMES Market up 0.8% Colgate-Palmolive (CL) up 0.92%

BroChochOooo

Is there any reason why they tank more ? CL is in this zone a lot. 1.27 - 1.34.

BroChochOooo

Is there any reason why they tank more ? CL is in this zone a lot. 1.27 - 1.34.

TheStrat

Perfect time to buy puts on SPY or QQQ and calls on USO or futures on NQ short and CL long

Blistorious

Gosh.. Finally after all those years 😂 GTI to 100 CL to 20 Coming soon!

Valkyrie_Skuld

Brent (/BZ) — likely the most days above $95. Brent surpassed $100/b on March 12 and continued to generally increase throughout the month, finishing the quarter at $118/b after averaging $103/b in March. Brent likely crossed $95 around March 10–11 and stayed above through end of March (~15 trading days), then held above $95 for most of April except the mid-month ceasefire dip — May WTI closed down -10.84 (-11.45%) on Friday April 17, falling to a 5-week low , and Brent dropped similarly. Rough estimate: ~28–32 trading days between the two months. WTI (/CL) and E-mini WTI (/QM) — far fewer. The Brent-WTI spread averaged $12/b in March and peaked at $25/b on March 31 , which means WTI averaged ~$91 in March and was only above $95 on the strongest tape days. WTI settled at $92.96 yesterday , so even the recent rebound hasn’t sustainably reclaimed $95. Rough estimate: ~5–10 trading days total for /CL and /QM (they move tick-for-tick since /QM is just half-size WTI).

Provolone-Jones

Up 7k on oil since Friday *is still down 5k from the May CL shenanigans*

ModeForJoe

WTF was that 50bp flash crash on ES from 8:00 to 8:10? Somebody take a big short pos on ES? or long position on CL? Barron!? B A R R O N !!!?!1!?

uvallie

Gave up on USO for anything beyond swing trades ages ago for the exact spread reason you mentioned. XOM and CVX is where I ended up most of the time. for pure oil exposure what worked better than ETFs for me was XOP or OIH which are the producers and services baskets, still index flavored but way more liquid than USO on the options side. XOP in particular has tight spreads at weekly strikes. USO has the contango drag on top of bad option liquidity so even when your call IS right directionally the fund can lag crude by a surprising amount over a few weeks, not a fun surprise if you are holding anything out to 30 or 60 dte. if you want the pure oil view and are ok with futures, /MCL is worth looking at since its 1/10 the notional of /CL so way less buying power needed per contract.

Bromoblue

So almost everything is green today, even the derived CL. Yet I'm still losing money with USO

Concept-Plastic

CL needs to die

ai-moderator

#TLDR --- **Ticker:** USO / CL (Crude Oil) **Direction:** Up **Prognosis:** Buy USO Calls / Go Long Oil **Catalyst:** High-stakes geopolitical hide-and-seek **Iranian Navy Status:** Blown up; currently managing blockades with civilian rowboats **Summary:** The U.S. is flying a massive, continuous military supply train into the Middle East while effectively choking off the Strait of Hormuz. Iran has been trying to smuggle oil out by turning off ship transponders (AIS) and hugging the coastlines of Iran and Pakistan, but the U.S. has figured out their routes and is actively seizing their ghost ships in international waters. Less oil is making it out of the Persian Gulf than the world realizes, leading to a shortage that the market is currently under-pricing.

ShariaAUSP

Drill baby drill. Both OIL and CL.

ModeForJoe

/CL is light sweet crude settled at Cushing OK oil distribution center. ME oil is medium to heavier crude, and WTI needs to be blended with heavier grades to work in most of the worlds refineries. If the heavy stuff is super expensive and scarce, the light stuff might not sell as well and be not as high in price as you'd expect. In the razor/blades model, you sell cheap razors to make bank off blades. Expensive ME barrels is the opposite and retarded version of that. I haven't found solid info on from oil industry, but I suspect that might be it... not sure tho ¯\\\_(ツ)\_/¯

Unemployable1593

CL with some actual volume today. i should definitely be taking profit here, but you know how it goes

muttur

Looks like the /CL shorting task force ran out of powder

derbilante

It looks like the last traded price for May CL contract is around $89. So what happened?

jonneh

*RISK OFF* > Silver -2.4% > > Gold -1.3% > > ES -0.7% > > NQ -0.7% > > CL +5.9%

FlatwormBig5514

It's the sheer breath of insider trading at this stage, and it's never been \*this\* clear. There are several large orders shortly before major tweets are sent out. Almost every single time. Of course, one person shorting 1,000 contracts in CL over the course of an hour isn't going to move the markets, and it will be absorbed by retail, algos, funds, etc. Then, as the news hits, the market tanks because there aren't any buyers, the insider(s) cash in, and the market moves as normal again. They do this multiple times/week at this point. His tweets move the markets. He can just tell certain people "hey, I'm sending this out in 2 hours", and they can then time the markets. It's the most blatant corruption our country has ever seen.

pmward

Sadly, the markets aside from CL stopped really caring about this around the first of the month. Good news is bought. Bad news is bought. Doesn't matter anymore.

MasterSexyBunnyLord

You would futures to hedge not the ETF for FOPs. You can use smaller futures like MGC for GC and so on too. You can also use other options too. Using ETFs would be hard because futures carry interest in their price which means prices won't align properly There is also a lot less liquidity in GC and CL options than SPX which means getting good fills on BWB is going to be very hard. Expect most entries not to fill and same for closing them out. They're American options both of them. You can be assigned at any time. The only meaningful difference is the price of the asset is from the average of the last 30 seconds of trade.

SlartibartfastMcGee

I would like my banbet on oil to be recognized. CL to $92 this week. https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/s/FL237oRSsS

kim82352

CL $75 EoD

Toe_Shanks

Kind of answered your own question there. These are not Euro style like SPX so if they're itm then yes there is an inherent risk of early assignment, but not a guarantee. If you close them out before settlement, then also yes, you won't have anything to worry about. Since the start of Iran CL has been carrying a fair amount of volatility and extrinsic value until the final moments and it only stops trading 30min before close. GC though stops trading at 1:30et so opening a trade in the morning, especially a bwb, isn't going to leave much juice to squeeze whether a credit or debit. Pennies in front of a steamroller, or fuzz off a grape as he said lol. Another thing to remember, which isn't going to apply directly here but you'll still notice. Is that the pricing on spreads is different enough between options on futures and their etf/index counterpart that it sometimes makes a strategy that works on one incompatible with the other. ES/SPX, RTY/RUT, NQ/NDX for example have a more obvious skew in their pricing because of the Euro vs American expirations. CL/USO are more loosely correlated than GC/GLD, but it still may work in your case. CL tracks WTI, it doesn't hold WTI, and it doesn't track the whole thing. USO tracks WTI by holding the front month contract, not pysical oil itself, and not the whole timeline. This causes some drag and further separates the resulting move that one might see versus the other as time goes on. Think of WTI as the whole curve, USO only tracks a slice of it at the front. So for a single or two day hedge you should be fine, but anything on a longer timeframe then USO won't provide quite as tight of a hedge as you think it will. GC/GLD is the opposite story. GLD holds bullion, not the contract, so it's a much tighter correlation without the drag that USO has and would provide a better hedge. Think of CL/USO as a derivative of a derivative, and GC/GLD as spot for spot. But with the points I made above, the GC/GLD trade you're wanting to take may not be as profitable as you think it will be because of how little time will be left once you open it. If you want to branch out to trading options on futures in the same way you have been trading, go for it. But the same strategy you're using on SPX/SPY might not work for CL/USO, GC/GLD, NQ/NDX/QQQ, RTY/RUT/IWM. But you currently have a strategy that's working. As Steve Clark said, "Do more of what works and less of what doesn't"

SwordfishLopsided

Assignment risk is real but you can mitigate it by closing the option positions, or just go long/short the respective underlying futures before close. CL and GC are as if not more liquid than SPX

Weekly_One8412

I'm new to futures, what's up with the /CL chart?

OurNewestMember

1. learn the settlement characteristics. Some options are physically settled, some financially. This also affects how close to expiration you can carry positions (see next point) 2. Learn the delivery basics. Mainly, what your broker does around that time. Many retail brokers won't let you take physical delivery, so the flow is like this: trade futures options, options are exercised or assigned (possibly early) and then the resulting futures position (sometimes only a few hours old) must be liquidated by you, or your broker will call you and tell you to close out or they will do it for you. Ie, If you're running a volatility strategy, you need to know any non-obvious dates or limits that might affect, say, your gamma positioning (eg, due to delivery rules on the underlying that will affect what you can do with the options) 3. You should definitely understand rates and also carry in general. Do you know how to find the comparable strikes between ES and SPY, for example? Do you know how to trade or avoid the dividend? 4. US taxes can get confusing for things like "mixed straddles", fyi 5. The basics: are you trading American style or European? AM or PM expiration? When does the spot/cash market stop trading? (And therefore liquidity dries up). Etc 6. Margin. Obviously futures margin is separate from securities margin. And it's risk-based. The carry on the margin/debits is a struggle for many people. Daily cash sweeps are not great, but it sounds like you want to avoid holding outrights anyway 7. More basics. 18 month options on USO have the same underlying ticker as the 0 DTE options. Not the case for CL options. Don't screw up your calculations for strikes and carry when working over any duration Anyway, nothing inherently stops you. But often hedging like this mainly adds complication (not always, though). If you want to open an options spread in CL and hedge with USO, it's possible. Not great, but it can work. IIRC, CL options are American style, so early assignment is on the table (which shouldn't be a huge deal, but carrying the outright can be a pain) -- similar to USO options anyway.

SlartibartfastMcGee

Just gonna set a little limit sell on CL futures @ $92.5 and fall asleep.

Sanpaku

[WTI ](https://www.barchart.com/futures/quotes/CL*0/futures-prices?viewName=main)and [Brent](https://www.ice.com/products/219/Brent-Crude-Futures/data?marketId=6018439) markets don't appear to be buying it.

DeezCodeNutz

What's up with that big f'n 🔨 candle on CL today?

Poptart_Salad

From what little I know about NG, it's significantly more abundant than CL and hard to transport, so it's more sensitive to local demand/supply fluctuations. And weather. From what I've looked at on the chart it seems like Spring is typically the worst season of the year for it, the strongest being the extreme seasons Summer and Winter. So yeah, I'd just wait for the inevitable weather event pop and try to get out as close to BE as I can. Personally been thinking about getting long BOIL myself but NG is weird and scary to me. But this is getting to be a 2 year low so...starting to look appealing.

Retaining-Wall

If either of these situations happen, and especially the latter, we will have many worries, CL @ $120 one of them.

ModeForJoe

The moment a navy ship is damaged or a Chinese ship is seized, /CL to $120 easy.

fuf3d

It's how the market works. When everyone was long to the gills oil last week - $120 barrel on /CL record long position - right after that flashed /CL down $20 in 3 hours - same for US equity markets, record short positions or PUTS = historic rally and the real stranger thing is it might not be over - thinking mind says it will return to mid, but the pain is greatest if it squeezes higher - software is still undervalued due to the AI bullshit selloff a few weeks prior to the war kick offs, postponement, kick 🦶 off, halftime whatever the hell that was/is so if software has the ability to rally then this week could end up with new ATH and Trump will have to bring Pam Bondi back to talk about the DOW, S&P, and NASDAQ.

absolutxtr

da fuk happend to oil (CL) at 19:34??

Consistent_Math_9482

1. Irrelevant 2. Irrelevant 3. What do you mean by “essentially frozen”? labor market is still strong, unemployment is low. Worker productivity increasing 4. Technically true compared to last quarter, but if you zoom out gdp growth is still healthy 5. Only temporary, long dated CL contracts are still trading at 50. If you disagree you are free to profit by longing CL 6. False 7. Subjective. “The market should drop” because “AI is in a bubble” is tautological 8. Absolute amount is meaningless. Normalized by GDP it is not that bad compared to other counties 9. False unless you cherry pick certain date ranges. wage growth is higher than CPI for the last 3 years

Competitive_Corgi_12

Front-month (CL/Brent 1st) can be down even with SoH traffic \~-90% because the marginal price-setter in the prompt contract right now is “probability + timing of normalization,” not today’s physical scarcity. 1) Paper is pricing a non-zero “deal / reopening” path, and it’s very headline-sensitive The last 1–2 weeks have repeatedly seen: rallies on escalation/blockade headlines, then sharp givebacks on “talks could resume / Iran wants a deal” type remarks (see ANZ 4/14: WTI gave up gains late after Trump said Iran wants to “work a deal”). That optionality compresses the front month most, because it’s the contract most exposed to “reopen next week vs next month.” 2) stress is in physical contracts 3) Buffers + policy flow (SPR) mute flat price, even as the system is stressed The market entered with buffers; SPR releases and “oil on water” delivered in March bought time (MS 3/30; “oil at sea” depletion dynamics also discussed in JPM 3/27 and the 3/17 note). 4) Demand destruction / macro-risk is being pulled forward into the prompt barrel With refinery run cuts in Asia due to crude availability (MS 3/30: +2–2.5 mb/d Asia refining curtailed; JPM notes runs down materially), the immediate crude bid can soften even while products blow out. 5) Microstructure/positioning: de-risking and vol control often hits the front first When vol spikes, systematic de-leveraging and discretionary risk reduction tend to sell the most liquid point (front month) even if the fundamental story is bullish. (General market microstructure; not explicitly in docs.) Net: the tape is effectively saying “yes, the physical situation is ugly, but we’re trading the distribution of outcomes.” If the market’s implied path shifts even slightly toward “talks resume / partial reopening / workaround flows (Fujairah/Yanbu/Iran exports) continue,” front month sells off hardest even though SoH traffic is still massively impaired.

fuf3d

Yeah it's difficult to say at this point. Sorry you lost your long response, Reddit is good like that. Hell the S&P is back threatening all time highs again, and /CL Futures are down below $100 at the moment around $95 so it's almost like the worst was priced in a week ago and people are ready to get their greed back on in the market. Bitcoin looks like it's about to retest $75,000 and if it breaks through a whole sector of the market that's been selling since late Jan/ Feb is going to rally hard as shorts are squeezed out, so there isn't any sense to be made out of the market response other than the initial reactions. I told my son that the real play is going to be selling /CL short and I'm a no-body but I've been watching the markets and attempting to trade them for years. They always act as you would expect until you enter a position for some reason. I'm still holding the MSFT $400 calls and if they go in the money in the next 3 days I'm going to be so happy I won't know what to do, only regrets are not buying more at .25 cents but I had bought them too far out and paid too much to begin with. Patience, if you don't have it the market will teach you or take all your money in the process.

DeezCodeNutz

If TACO holds tomorrow, CL to 88

SlartibartfastMcGee

!Banbet CL=F below $92 9days

DefiantDelta

Bessent can bid down CL all he wants, UCO is the truth

absolutxtr

the fuck was that massive dump CL! just took?

ModeForJoe

The /CL futes candle on 9:48AM EST looks fucking crazy, and this seems to be the tail that is wagging the SPX dog. What triggered this selloff? Or who triggered it? Is the admin selling front-month contracts while buying long-dated contracts? This is insane without any real news.

Significant_Speed854

I’m genuinely afraid to press the sell button on /ES or buy on /CL bc of manipulation

TopTrey9

CL up 8% and NQ down less than 1%…😆😆😆 one of them is lying

fuf3d

S&P opened up down 80 points CL Front month futures is up 10% $105.34 barrel. Glad I sold calls on the rally, get paid to wait.

eje0100

I got in right at 6pm long CL futures. Shit is going to $115+

Sanpaku

We'll see when crude futures markets open. [WTI](https://www.barchart.com/futures/quotes/CL*0/futures-prices?viewName=main), [Brent](https://www.ice.com/products/219/Brent-Crude-Futures/data?marketId=6018439).

TopTrey9

That higher low for CL…oil is going higher boys and girls. This could get nasty over the next few days.

fuzzywuzzy123

Oh my god. CL crude oil futures is at +8.3% 😱 You gonna be rich dawg!!