ZEC

Forevererer

Absolutely sacrificing. Be wary of “crypto”. After a bunch of years I only allocate to BTC (98%) and ZEC (2%) and this point.

LTP-N

Doesn't matter what you think either. All crypto is useless and we're all out here gambling, get off your high horse, you don't know any more or less than the rest of us. Before you cry and reply saying I'm salty because I obviously hold alt coins, correct, but my gamblings are 50% BTC, 30% ETH, 10% XTZ and 10% ZEC.

Bazaruta

There are. ETH is useful for smart contracts. ZEC and XMR provide privacy on transactions. HYPE is kinda like a stock, like binance and coinbase stock. Just to name a few. But true for the average coin, there is none…yet people throw money at it. When a 5 min google search would tell you that, the thing you are paying for is worthless.

Bazaruta

There are good alts, ETH, TAO, HYPE are good. ZEC kinda is too. But I agree. Most are trash, if people researched a bit before throwing money at it, they would so much better!

Bazaruta

There are good alts, ETH, TAO, HYPE are good. ZEC kinda is too. But I agree. Most are trash, if people researched a bit before throwing money at it, they would so much better!

corpski

We're in a fine place. I'm actually very unattached to the market now and would be looking very much forward to more large market drawdowns. Objectively, this so-called "bear market" has been very mild compared to cycles past. I'm not into Ondo but if you really have a good reason to believe it's going to do extremely well, you should DCA. Been here for a decade. This is not the place to tell people that you're into Solana -- people are too clueless. I said this years ago but nothing has changed here pretty much: [https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/1gamlcy/comment/ltn0jki/](https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/1gamlcy/comment/ltn0jki/) Luck is certainly a thing, but your alpha is on crypto twitter and that hasn't changed. Keep buying with every agonizing low and sell at every new breaking high. I never trade on leverage. Long-drawn cycles are my bread and butter, and I sit on my ass for months or years. But you need to get the narratives right, and this place has always had a terrible track record for that. So many commenters lack the necessary information and are too emotional, hold silly, outdated, or uninformed biases, or end up holding coins that simply have no chance to ever pump reasonably again. Also, I have no plans of ever truly exiting the market. I've made my peace with that. I have no ability to catch the highest highs or the lowest of lows. The only thing I can manage reasonably is risk. Most important of all, you need ammo. If you can't buy the dip, it'll make things exponentially harder. Make sure to do everything you can to never put yourself in that situation. Manage risks, don't stake or lend out all your stables. The biggest purpose of your stablecoins is to buy cheap coins, not to earn 3-5% per annum. With every monstrous dip, the potential for return becomes so much bigger. Always do your best to be aware of what's happening in the market and which assets actually have the biggest hype, narratives, and promise. Time lines are never always exactly the same for each coin. The narratives change every cycle. It's not that hard to know what's up if you try. Above everything else, stay objective and never be a maxi. For example, there are some truly old coins in the top 10 that I feel don't deserve to be there, and only pump because of certain reasons. I will never turn down an opportunity to make a good long-term trade off that. Since I'm a horrible daytrader, I make it up by setting solid rules, apart from setting rigid buy and sell points. I set a datum point for each coin and sell 20% of all held coins at every 25% price increase, and buy a calculated portion back with every 30-40% drawdown -- subject to the coin's MC, available liquidity, and perceived volatility. Assets that have made me the most in the last few months: HYPE (now the biggest portion of my porfolio, though I didn't intend for it to be), ZEC, BP (thanks entirely to CT). My preference is to buy with growing USD size every time the price dips further into the abyss. I do have a cut-off, where the buying simply stops, and if the price ever gets there, one would have to think - WTF happened to make it actually go that low. The 20-100x's were already made. I'd be happy with doing much less in the future. My YOLO days were back in the previous decade. There's no place for that now, and hopefully ever in the future. If an asset fails the CT narrative and consistently fails to produce results in a reasonably expected time frame when it's supposed to pump along with other assets, it may be time to consider dropping that one.

shaunj72143

I forgot about ZEC had spent one of my stimulus checks on investing in it, was just starting to explore privacy coins....forgot about it til my phone and laptop starting blowing tf up with alerts to an account that I had on the back burner so long I forgot it existed. I'm retiring after next tax season at 48. (Not even going to mention how much I made off SOL). Point being, don't judge a fledgling industry not even a whole two decades in. This would be like turning your back on Ford stocks in the 30s.

shaunj72143

Hang on to the ZEC. Glad I did.

SheKnows9797

Honestly your current approach already sounds closer to “responsible long-term allocation” than most people in crypto. The main thing I’d be careful about is changing it just for “tidying it up” rather than because your thesis on any of those assets has changed. A few thoughts: * BTC heavy + ETH + some privacy exposure (XMR/ZEC) already gives you diversification across different narratives * SOL/BNB are more ecosystem / platform bets, so swapping into them is less about simplification and more about shifting conviction * “Set and forget” only works if you’re actually comfortable holding through full cycles without reacting to short-term sentiment If anything, the bigger question is not “should I condense” but “do I still believe each of these has a reason to exist in my portfolio 5–10 years from now?” If yes, there’s not a strong need to optimize it further.

jwz9904

ZEC is the real king

Da_WooDr

Siacoin, Holochain, Amp, XRP, XLM, LTC, Dash, BCH, ZEC, VeChain, Mana, ICP, XDC, Algo, Link, FileCoin, XMR,

financeguruIB

$ZEC will lead the bull market

Aromatic-Ad7987

Hbar, Link,XLM,ZEC,

BookOfKingsOfKings

I’m no pro and haven’t held either but Ive heard sketchy things about ZEC, whereas XMR seems to have an airtight record; also privacy optional vs privacy mandated, by default (respectively)

BookOfKingsOfKings

Thoughts on XMR? Any particular reason you hold ZEC over XMR?

financeguruIB

Now we’re talking. $ZEC $TAO $SOL😎

Intelligent_Net_2786

My other bags: BTC, Eth, LInk, Sol, Hype, XLM, ZEC, Tao

financeguruIB

I’m intrigued by $BCH. I will look into it. $ZEC is one of my bags. Also considering $XMR

financeguruIB

Privacy is a big selling point for sure. Imagine it’s a 6B mcap and no exchange carries it. With the rise of AI inching closer and closer, we need privacy more than ever. I hold ZEC but i might also start accumulating XMR

Distinct-Presence52

Because ZEC is not private. Thats why they used XMR. Because it is everything people say ZEC is but without the lies.

unknowngloomth

The crypto has shifted a lot. You have to be a mercenary in this space. Either that, or you will wind up becoming a bagholders and the exit liquidity for insiders, early buyers and VCs. Finding gem is extremely hard. Crypto makes no sense. Take ZEC for instance. It was dead for years. Some enterprise came along and adopted ZEC. It was rekindled. Obviously it is still massively down from its ATH.

Serenaded

How's that little infinite minting glitch on ZEC going broski?

ZenOasisNZ

"*Zcash price crashed more than 45*% after researchers disclosed a bug that could have allowed unlimited counterfeit ZEC" ZEC is an Epstein Mossad Ponzi Scheme btw

Serenaded

Of all the things to buy right now, ZEC is probably the absolute worst thing. It's not just because of the exploit, it's almost specifically because it's pumped 20x this year. I bought Kaspa right before last cycle began as it had been pumping through the bear, then when the bull started Kaspa crabbed the entire time while everything else pumped, and then fell off a cliff when the 2025 bear began. This is your future OP.

NovastaKai

You've missed massive booms. Do these tools just hold and hold...never to use the timing element of the market or what? 🤣 i set a 2x 5x 10x reminder and take 20-30% at each interval at LEAST. Its valled damage limitation and actually securing a profit.. Siren went from 0.04 to like 4.5 in the recent months 🤣🤣 with the millions in daily vol there is plenty to be made all the time.. people are just.. people :,) ZEC!? MXR.. Even XLM went up recently about 50% 😅 idk.. if i had enough to sit back and chill i might have left it ling term but it is foolish to expect something from time alone. Attention is value*

ModernCYPH3R

Here's the simple truth: because Zcash Orchard is a private shielded pool, it's literally impossible to prove if the bug was exploited or not. The bug let someone bypass validation to mint unlimited fake ZEC inside the pool. Yes, the hard fork patched it, and yes, developers say there's no evidence of an exploit. But because the pool is a black box, any counterfeit coins made inside stay 100% invisible. Unless developers force a migration through a new audited pool, anyone claiming they're sure nothing was minted is just coping.

Educational_Cable405

The part people skip over: nobody can actually see inside the shielded pool, not even the Zcash devs. The only real check is the turnstile between transparent and shielded addresses. If someone minted fake ZEC and ever cashed it out, more value would leave the pool than went in, and that would be visible on chain. So far it hasn't happened, and that's what 'no evidence' actually rests on, not some line by line audit.

Vegetable-Advance982

They mean altcoins because by crypto being over they mean 'the trading atmosphere we've been playing around in may never come back'. Hyperliquid broke through ATHs lately. VVV, nice chart. ZEC was doing well, may or may not recover from the recent exploit. 'Crypto' is ending, and it is simply becoming 'companies that have an actual product and deliver revenue to it's token' and 'everything else'. The first group has very very few tokens. The second has been going through big waves, but now that crypto isn't the only place for degens to gamble their hearts out and get 1000x, it may never come back. That's what the guy means by 'crypto is dead'.

capnwally14

positive jobs numbers is the bearish news btw if fed isnt choosing between labor and inflation, they're more likely to respond to inflation (i.e. hikes) also there are a few other things going on: \- ZEC supply bug discovered from a generic prompt out of opus doesnt bode well for security \- Energy prices stlil super high - bad for bitcoin, which drags other majors down \- Quantum risk is ticking up (new estimates are teams need to be ready by 2029) \- .. and add in the liquidity suck of massive IPOs (SpaceX / Anthropic / OpenAI) plus major financing deals (e.g. Google's preferred offering) and ai supply chain stocks ripping

cryptolipto

Seems like everyone is focused on ZEC right now ?

yode8

I see what you’re saying. That’s true of all assets. But in the case of ZEC the long term sentiment ‘trend’ will likely never fully recover from this. You said an asset is worth what the people holding it think it’s worth, but surely there’s an aspect which the people who are not holding it can affect its value by perception or sentiment. Also I agree about the 90% thing, many top coins are down by nearly that much. But as long as they’re not trending towards zero they’re not dead

LargeSnorlax

It did go down significantly, it's down 40% today. It also had a huge run up before that, but I'm making a decent point too - The asset is literally worth what people holding it think its worth. Litecoin for example has an extremely low sentiment so it's down 90%, and now ZEC has extremely low sentiment so it's down 90%. Neither of them have any real reason to be any price other than hype for the asset (of which there is little for either) or high sentiment (lacking there too) so the prices being an equal amount down from the highs sounds about right. Weirdly, -90% from high in a bear is probably not even that bad. There's a bunch of things (Like DASH) that are 98%+.

vmarchese

Depends what you mean by pump and dump.  Did some market participants (i.e. influencers) pump ZEC, then dump their holdings to exploit this headline for profit? Absolutely! Does this have anything to do with the project maintainers or early participants? Absolutely not. This is not a classic rug pull. The only material effect this event produces is to enhance security over the long-term.

MrWonderfulPoop

I was wondering what this was about and see ZEC crapped the bed by \~42% in 24 hours. But it's not a rug pull.

TheDookieboi

All of those are valued in dollars. Not XMR. Not ZEC. If you’re looking to make purchases of those things you need dollars.

beanbalance

>obvious for everyone from the start wat? these is literally tens of millions of people who are just BTC maxis who still believe that BTc is the shit. Then there are ETH believers, ZEC, solana,... and then there are gazillion of all the shitcoin holders who though crypto is more than pump and dump. maybe YOU were among those few who knew it was "obvious from the start" but then what are you doing on this sub then?

Kandiru

DCR has the same privacy benefits as ZEC while still being auditable to protect against secret supply inflation. It does have a 10% dev subsidy, but that's controlled by PoS voters so it's spent on things to benefit everyone. There is a Dex to allow trustless atomic swaps across chains so you can swap in and out to BTC or Eth without needing to trust an exchange.

Aerocryptic

What were you doing with your life when you could have just printed an infinity of ZEC?

holiquetal

ZEC is going full LUNA. There is no way to prove there was no minting. It's going straight to 0.

CounterAdmirable4218

The winner of the privacy coin battle won’t be ZEC. Nor will it be XMR. It will be Litecoin with optional privacy.

Hannahshear

ZEC is a project developed by Israeli secret services, DYOR guys

ALth0r

Eveything is getting killed because if AI could find an exploit in ZEC code, who knows if it wont for others ?

verysillyman

ZEC the Z is for zerooo

oopssomething

ZEC -50% in a day, but TRUMP is the obvious rugpull right?

Serenaded

Hence why I just sold ZEC 3 days ago for XMR. XMR is clearly the only one in use for its usecase. ZEC's run is exhausted.

ThereIsNoGovernance

ZEC privacy is unfortunately compromised: almost all swaps/cex insist on transparent (unsheilded) transactions. It's the wannabe privacy coin that normies think is 'safer' than monero. If you want liquidity and real privacy, monero has been providing it without fail for well over a decade.

pooperdooper

It needs to go to zero. It's possible there are trillions of ZEC that were minted with this exploit. Even the researcher could have done it secretly. Nobody would know.

Serenaded

\>A bug was discovered that had been dormant for years and could in theory allow someone to mint ZEC in the shielded pool Literally everyone was saying this when it was pumping that it's shady AF and has backdoors. XMR was always the only one. ZEC is for the greedy and foolish. All these bagholders deserve it. This basically officially means XMR won the head to head. ZEC might be dumping now, XMR is going to pump out of this as it's now the undisputed king of darkfi.

akuukka

There's no way to tell if the bug has been exploited or not. If I had infinite amount of ZEC and nobody knew about it, I would only sellso much that no one would notice.

the_rodent_incident

Zoom out. ZEC isn't dumping because of some exploit. It's because it pumped like 3x in a few weeks, without being actually used as money anywhere. Basically pump & dump.

necropuddi

BTC is down like 3%, most alts are down like 5-10%, ZEC's -32% surely is just due to BTC. Makes sense.

PonkeSolWhalePro

ZEC non ha fondamenta vere come XMR

0fWhomIAmChief

Damn, Ai's wrecking ZEC? So much for being an actual contender with XMR 

Large-Cow9765

Yeah, but have you seen ZEC?

tj78492

Cardano dumping and Charles taking a break, SOL in the dumps, Bankless selling ETH, Saylor selling BTC, ZEC exploited... this is a shit show

AutoModerator

Post is by: Wise-Cow-8541 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1twxnoy/binance_links/ 🚨 Zcash (ZEC) is moving — bullish or bearish? Either way, you need to be watching the charts. I built a FREE crypto price tracker specifically for traders 👇 🔗 [bestcryptotracker.netlify.app](http://bestcryptotracker.netlify.app) ✅ Live prices ✅ Track ZEC, BTC, ETH & more ✅ Direct links to trade on Binance Not on Binance yet? Sign up through the site — takes 2 mins, and new users get exclusive bonuses when they start trading. Don't sleep on this 🔥 *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

5553331117

$ZEC 😂 😂  King grifter gonna grift, dude should have stayed in prison.

Prior_Parsley3960

**Summary:** Zcash executed an emergency network upgrade after developers found a critical vulnerability in its main privacy system (the Orchard shielded pool). The flaw was caught before any known exploitation. **Why it matters:** * Orchard is Zcash's primary privacy layer and holds billions of dollars worth of ZEC. * Developers considered the issue serious enough to temporarily halt Orchard transactions network-wide. * Funds and privacy protections were not compromised, according to the Zcash team. **What happened:** * An emergency soft fork was activated on June 2. * Miners were instructed to stop processing Orchard transactions until a fix was deployed. * The transition caused some temporary chain instability and orphaned blocks, but the network remained operational. **Impact on users:** * Funds are reportedly safe. * ZEC trading on exchanges continued normally. * Wallets that rely on Orchard (including Cake Wallet) temporarily lost ZEC transaction functionality. **Bigger picture:** * This is the latest in a series of major Zcash security patches during 2026. * Critics argue that maintaining two separate node implementations has increased complexity and created recurring consensus risks. * The incident comes while Zcash is experiencing a major resurgence, with ETF speculation, institutional interest, and a strong price rally. **Bottom line:** No funds were stolen, but a serious vulnerability was found in the heart of Zcash's privacy infrastructure. The rapid emergency response appears to have prevented a potentially much more damaging security incident.

kironet996

u still buying CRO and ZEC?

Serenaded

It's funny af how basically the entire internet agrees that XMR is the way to go and no one is ever going to use ZEC for its actual usecase as long as XMR exists.

Django_McFly

the actual news story is that a critical exploit was found in the part of the protocol where those tokens were so they did a soft fork rather than let the chain get exploited for 85% of all private ZEC. Actual article title: > Zcash Executes Emergency Fork After Critical Orchard Vulnerability Discovery > Zcash halted Orchard transactions holding over 4.5 million ZEC in an emergency fork, while the $9.8 billion network continued operating and ZEC traded near $587.

GlitteringBelt4287

Market is worried about quantum computing cracking SHA-256 Bitcoin suffered while ZEC benefited

Adventurous-Status38

FUD all you want. ZEC is making holders rich and XMR holders poor lol

Normal-Spell5339

That’s a silly take. If they were backdooring it they wouldn’t do a press release about it. All this means is making it so that you can show the origins of funds if you want, just like you can with XMR, they ship that feature with the core wallet to “prove”transactions if you choose to. It’s the same functionality in both XMR and ZEC. Google moonlight research if you want to see devs corrupting the privacy of XMR.

Normal-Spell5339

If you transact in XMR it is transparent at the ends. The entity sending you XMR knows where it went and the receiver knows where they received it from. If you buy it from Kraken or a swap site they know X address bought Y amount. Similarly wherever it’s offloaded knows the address sending to it and the transaction it’s involved in and the amount. But if the amounts aren’t exactly the same and you make use of the shielded pool at some point you have anonymity. With the coming CARROT upgrade there will be transparent pools in XMR just like ZEC. This facilitates defi swaps like actual ones not the jankey ass Haveno stuff. That’s the main use of transparent pools in ZEC, for DeFi. That’s probs why its price has been going crazy, it’s like XMR but easier to obtain. You don’t have to find an exchange that lists it you can just bridge to it.

Normal-Spell5339

What back door? Won’t it be on the same level of privacy once they implement CARROT in XMR? Transparent and non transparent pools so you can have anonymity AND bridge-Ability? And XMR will catch up in terms of privacy and be on equal footing with the ZEC once they implement FCMP++. You’ll upgrade from rings to the entire chain is your privacy ring. A lot of people have not really researched these things before forming an opinion

Saffuran

So when audits uncover an exploit you would prefer ZEC keep running so that it can be exploited than momentarily pausing transactions, patching the exploit as soon as it is discovered before it can be exploited, and then resuming activity?

Cratos007

But [$ZEC](https://x.com/search?q=%24ZEC%20OR%20zcash%3Anative&src=smarttag_click) price surged 10-14% instead of crashing??

Fit_Employment_2595

Not ZEC

kers2000

HYPE, ZEC, NEAR and ICP are showing extreme resilience. I think the revenue, privacy and AI narratives are the only ones that will print this summer.

unknowngloomth

Same thing you could wonder about other coins. Why ZEC is going up and not dumping why lab is going up like crazy and not dumping? See? Nobody knows shit about fuck specifically folks in this sub. If they did. They'd be extremely rich by now and not on Reddit

xmewsickx

ZEC is what Bitcoin should have been

xmewsickx

The market is alive and booming ZEC is the way

antistupidsociety

Now show it compared to HYPE, ZEC, NEAR over the past year lol

Saffuran

Stay out until closer to Q4 most likely -- also don't look at things outside of the top 20 or so tokens (market cap) and I tend to avoid memes in that filter as well. By the time BTC bottoms the ETH/BTC dilation iis probably going to be toward its relative lows which will be interesting for entry. Solana should also see a strong bounce (between now and Q4, SOL will probably be trading in the $30s at some point and that will be the safest entry since its fair value gap will be filled. I admit there is second-hand meme exposure there so there is a double-edged sword but I genuinely like how the system operates. AVAX/LINK will be interesting layer 2 projects to look for entries in and Real-World-Asset markets and aggregators like ONDO may be some of the biggest overall opportunities. Privacy coins/layers like ZCash and ZKsync are already showing decent strength (especially ZEC) in this downtrend and if ZEC can maintain that relative strength with Bitcoin transitioning back into a Bull Market environment, it could have the biggest boom potential of all.

xmewsickx

You could double down or swap for ZEC

babashege

Any thoughts on HYPE and ZEC? Good time to buy?

Cultural-Candy3219

At this point I’d treat the Spot ZEC as a withdrawal problem, not a conversion problem. If Binance has disabled ZEC pairs for your entity, support probably cannot make Convert magically appear again. The practical route is usually: 1. Set up a self-custody ZEC wallet, or an exchange account that still accepts ZEC deposits for your jurisdiction. 2. Send a tiny test withdrawal first and wait for confirmations. 3. If the test lands, send the rest and convert there, or withdraw to your own wallet and use a reputable swap route after checking fees, limits and KYC. 4. Keep screenshots of Binance saying the assets can be “transferred out at your convenience.” If withdrawal also fails, that is a much cleaner complaint than “I expected internal conversion.” Do not use anyone who DMs you offering to recover or convert it for you. With ZEC, also double-check the exact address type/network the receiving side supports, because a wrong or unsupported deposit can be painful to unwind.

Certain-Use8674

After Binance force-settled my original short position, a remaining positive/net long ZEC balance was still left on my account. At that stage, there was already no compensation being considered for the losses on the short position, so I simply wanted to realize the remaining losses, fully exit ZEC, and move on. In the legal email, Binance stated that the remaining assets “could be transferred out at my convenience.” Based on that wording, plus earlier support discussions, I understood that I would still be able to internally liquidate/convert the remaining ZEC exposure. Because of that, I partially transferred the remaining ZEC long exposure from Isolated Margin into Spot, expecting I could later convert it into USDT or another supported asset like BTC or ETH. But after transferring into Spot, conversion of ZEC into USD/USDT or any other supported pair was no longer available on my account. After realizing the Spot conversion was not working, I personally tried using the force close/liquidation option on the remaining ZEC that was still left inside Isolated Margin, and that portion was successfully converted internally into USDT. If I had known earlier that internal force liquidation was still possible, I would never have transferred part of the remaining ZEC exposure into Spot in the first place. Now support says the remaining ZEC can only be transferred externally to another wallet/exchange, even though this was never clearly explained earlier. I also followed up with Binance Legal again regarding this issue, but unfortunately have not received any reply so far. At this point, what frustrates me most is not even the unsupported-asset policy itself, but the inconsistent handling during the migration/restriction process. I simply wanted to close the position, realize the losses, and regain access to my liquidity, but instead the situation became more complicated at every step. The remaining ZEC is now stuck in my Spot wallet, where I cannot trade, convert, or internally liquidate it into USDT/BTC/ETH. Support is now saying I can only transfer it externally, but I currently do not even have another crypto exchange/wallet account available. Would genuinely appreciate if anyone could suggest any practical solution on how I can move or convert the remaining ZEC from my Spot wallet into USDT

jazz_king_seb

Ticker is ZEC

blkbxxx

I’ve seen a lot of bearish news regarding eth recently, and luckily had rotated out of the last of my positions last year. It’s likely to come back up, but there seems to be a consensus that privacy and AI will dominate this next cycle and so I would explore rotating into other coins (Near, ZEC, VVV)

jazz_king_seb

ZEC

blkbxxx

Look into ZEC, near and Hype. A good place to start would be X and/or what Arthur Hayes says about them

0fWhomIAmChief

99.999% of blockchains are public. The few that arent, their privacy is still questioned by critics, most namely Monero and now, the sudden rise of ZEC.

Cultural-Candy3219

On timing, I would plan for weeks to months, not days. Regulators usually first acknowledge or triage the complaint, then ask the firm for a response, then decide whether it is within scope and whether they will push for remediation. It is rarely a fast trade-support channel. So I would split this into two tracks: keep pressing Binance for a written final position now, and file the VARA complaint with a clean timeline in parallel. Include screenshots or exported statements showing the migration date, when ZEC became restricted, each failed close attempt, the force-close terms, the created net long exposure, and the price at each key timestamp. If you file, ask for a case or reference number and the expected review steps, not just a generic received-it email. I would also keep the complaint itself very dry. The strongest version is a chronology of what control failed, when you lost the ability to reduce risk, and what loss that caused.

Certain-Use8674

Binance has completely ruined my situation financially and emotionally with this ZEC issue. My short position was force closed at an adverse price, and during settlement a net long exposure was created from Binance’s side. Since then, the market has continued falling while I still don’t have execution functionality to manage or close the position myself. What makes this worse is that the technical/compliance team has shown no willingness to reclaim the losses caused by their own platform issue. At this stage, I would also like to understand how long a case filed with VARA would typically take to be reviewed and resolved. After this experience, I no longer have confidence in continuing to trade with Binance.

These-Apple-6673

AI sector looking good, i had a daily swing for RENDER and WLD breaking their range. Might be a rotation from the ZEC and HYPE profits

yefuck

ZEC and WLD having a good time. Same with HYPE. Every coin pumping though seems to be a time long gone lol

Cultural-Candy3219

The missing piece now is not whether Dubai rules can restrict ZEC in the future; it is how Binance handled the transition for an already-open margin position. Keep that distinction very clear in every escalation. A complaint package should probably be framed around four factual questions: 1. What date and time did your account legally/operationally move to the Dubai entity? 2. At that moment, what close-only process existed for ZEC positions that were already open? 3. Why did the user-side reduce/close path fail if their own notice said existing positions could still be managed until June 8? 4. Which internal timestamp did they use when deciding the final settlement price, and why was the earlier failed-close window ignored? I would avoid making the dispute sound like a request for them to support ZEC again. That gives them an easy policy answer. The stronger issue is narrower: live exposure remained on your account, the normal risk-reduction control was unavailable, and the manual fallback arrived only after several days. If their front-line support keeps repeating the VARA/privacy-coin explanation, ask for the formal complaints route for Binance Dubai FZE and send a single chronology with attachments: migration notice, first failed close attempt, each failed execution screenshot, support promises, force-close authorization wording, final close timestamp, and the price difference you are disputing. Also ask them to preserve the platform logs for your account during that window. That does not guarantee an adjustment, but it makes the case about operational control failure rather than a general trading-loss argument.

Certain-Use8674

Binance has now clarified that my ZEC restriction was triggered after my account was migrated to Binance Dubai FZE on May 20, 2026. Their position is that ZEC is treated as a restricted privacy coin under the Dubai/VARA framework, so the trading access I previously had under the old Binance entity no longer applied after migration. I understand that explanation for why ZEC may not be supported going forward. But that still does not answer the core issue: I already had an open position, the exposure remained live, but the close/reduce function from my side stopped working for several days. If a legacy position is still active, there should be a proper close-only or risk-reduction route available. Instead, I was left with live exposure, failed close attempts, and unclear pricing impact. Binance is also refusing to review or adjust the price difference between the market level where I originally attempted to close/reduce the position and the materially different level where the position was eventually force-settled several days later. From my perspective, this points more toward an operational/control failure during the migration and restriction handling process . I believe situations like this deserve proper regulatory review so that users are not left exposed without a working risk-reduction path during compliance transitions.

Cultural-Candy3219

That explanation raises a different issue than compensation: whether the migration controls were applied symmetrically. If ZEC became restricted for UAE accounts, the sensible control pattern would be to block new exposure, warn existing holders, and preserve a close-only route until legacy positions are gone. A position that remains live while the user-side close path is disabled is the operational gap I would keep pressing them on. I would now ask for a written incident timeline rather than another general policy answer: - when your account was moved under the Binance Dubai / UAE rule set - when ZEC isolated margin became unsupported for that account type - whether your position was opened before or after that restriction took effect - what close-only process was supposed to exist for legacy restricted assets - why that process was unavailable to you for several days - what exact timestamp, price source, and approval path were used for the forced settlement Their jurisdiction explanation may justify not supporting ZEC going forward, but it does not automatically explain why an already-open position had no working risk-reduction path. I would keep the complaint narrow around that control failure: live exposure, no usable close function, delayed manual settlement, and unclear pricing.

Certain-Use8674

Binance has now force-settled/closed the original ZEC isolated margin position and later explained that the issue was related to UAE jurisdiction restrictions on ZEC after the Binance Dubai migration process. However, what I am still struggling to understand is: * if the restriction was already applicable, then how was the position originally allowed to be opened and maintained, * why the execution/close functionality stopped working during an active live trade while Binance’s own migration notice stated existing positions could remain manageable until June 8, * and why the detailed explanation only came after several days and after the position had already been force-closed. I had originally attempted to reduce/close the position much earlier, but the execution functionality was not working at all from the platform side. I shared screenshots, timestamps, failed execution notifications, emails, and other records throughout the process. The position was eventually force-settled at a materially different level, which significantly changed the financial outcome from my side. What makes the situation even more confusing is that earlier my exposure was effectively a net short position, but after Binance force-settled the account to recover/repay its own margin loan exposure, a remaining positive/net long ZEC balance was automatically left in the account. At the same time, the trading functionality for ZEC remains unavailable from my side under the UAE restriction settings, meaning I currently cannot even manually manage or close that remaining exposure myself. The entire experience has honestly been extremely stressful, especially because almost all my liquidity was tied up during this period and the delays also affected my ability to meet financial obligations on time.

Certain-Use8674

Thanks again, this actually helped me think about the situation more clearly. I asked Binance similar questions in writing. Their response was basically that they can’t comment on future dispute/compensation rights beyond the agreement wording, and that the force-close would happen at whatever market price exists when the execution eventually happens. I’ve already shared screenshots of failed close attempts, timestamps, loss movements, and other records from my side, but honestly it feels like the focus is still mainly on getting me to sign the force-close authorization rather than properly addressing the execution failure itself. The difficult part for me is that almost all my funds are tied up in this ZEC position right now, so practically my liquidity is stuck while the issue keeps dragging on.

Cultural-Candy3219

The repeated force-close request may be more about creating an authorization trail than about them having already explained the bug. That does not make the delay acceptable, but it explains why support keeps pushing the same form instead of giving you a technical root cause. I would make the next message very narrow and hard to dodge: 1. What exactly am I authorizing: a market close when the operations team gets to it, a close using the timestamp when I first requested help, or some manual adjustment? 2. Does signing this preserve my right to dispute the prior access/execution failure, or does it waive that claim? 3. Can Binance freeze the exposure/valuation reference at the time the close-only route first failed, since the delay is platform-side? 4. Can any unaffected balances be withdrawn now while the ZEC case stays open? If they will not answer those in writing, ask for escalation on the basis that you are not refusing to reduce risk; you need written execution terms before authorizing a delayed manual close. Keep everything in the ticket, with UTC timestamps and screenshots. Phone/chat-only answers are much weaker later. Given your liquidity need, the real tradeoff is probably not “wait vs perfect fix.” It is whether a documented force-close that explicitly preserves your dispute rights is safer than staying exposed for more days. I would avoid signing anything that reads like a broad release of claims.

--Ivxry--

It buying ZEC 2 months ago at the 200-220 price range

AutoModerator

Post is by: tornavec and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1tnxn63/trump_freed_crypto_but_privacy_coins_are_still/ Donald Trump is widely regarded as the first 'crypto president', having dedicated himself to making cryptocurrency accessible in the United States and around the world. He succeeded in bringing high-profile investigations against crypto industry leaders to a close, and granted pardons to Ross Ulbricht and Changpeng Zhao. However, anonymous coins have not been spared — quite the opposite, in fact. New laws being considered and passed by Congress could ultimately ban private coins. David Sacks, the Trump administration's crypto czar, is promoting such a ban. U.S. crypto exchanges are taking pre-emptive action. In March 2025, Kraken suspended XMR trading for EEA clients. Binance delisted the coin earlier that same year. In April 2025, Poloniex delisted Monero globally. Zcash can still be purchased in the US on Coinbase, Robinhood and Phemex. The overall trend for anonymous coins is negative. By 2025, 73 exchanges worldwide had delisted at least one privacy coin — up from 51 in 2023. Crypto gateways provide stable support for anonymous coins. Customers can legally purchase them through Cryptomus, NOWPayments, CoinPayments and CoinRemitter. This opens up the possibility of ZCash and Monero being adopted for corporate and retail payments. Grayscale’s conversion of the ZCash Trust into a spot ZEC ETF could spark institutional interest. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*

Fit_Employment_2595

You mean ZEC

SpontaneousDream

I was too early on the ZEC trade. Sold very low at like $50 to break even. Also too late selling on the LINK trade and only made like $20k when I could've made $200k. Thankfully I got it right with a few others so in the end it wasn't a big deal.

Cultural-Candy3219

That sounds like an execution/access problem, not a normal trading-loss dispute, so I would keep the case very procedural. A few things I would do before the record gets messy: 1. Export every order, position, balance, borrow/margin and trade-history record you can still access. Save the migration notice too. 2. In the ticket, ask for a written explanation of the exact restriction applied, when it started, and what close-only path Binance expects for pre-migration unsupported exposure. 3. Ask for escalation around a manual close, force-close, or equivalent risk-reduction action. That is clearer than a generic “why can’t I trade ZEC?” support thread. 4. Keep screenshots or screen recordings of failed close attempts with UTC time, pair, error text, platform/app version, and account region shown where possible. 5. If support keeps looping, use Binance Dubai FZE’s formal complaint route first, then the relevant UAE/VARA complaint channel with ticket IDs, the migration notice, and your failed-close evidence attached. I would avoid opening unrelated new trades while this is unresolved. The cleanest argument is that you were trying to reduce an existing pre-migration exposure and the platform control prevented the risk-reduction action.

AutoModerator

Post is by: Certain-Use8674 and the url/text [ ](https://goo.gl/GP6ppk)is: /r/CryptoMarkets/comments/1tnjmo7/binance_dubai_fze_migration_issue_unable_to_close/ Has anyone else in the UAE faced serious issues after Binance account migration to Binance Dubai FZE, especially with unsupported assets like ZEC? I’ve been dealing with an unresolved execution issue for the past several days involving an active ZEC spot leverage position that I was unable to close, sell, or even force close from my side. The position was originally opened before the Dubai migration restrictions, and Binance’s own migration notice stated that existing positions/orders would remain active until the applicable deadlines. The problem is that when I attempted to actively close and manage my exposure, the execution/close function stopped working properly on my account. Since then, my case has been under continuous escalation with Binance support, technical teams, derivatives teams, and compliance/relevant teams for several days without a practical resolution yet. During this period: * I remained exposed to continued market volatility * My losses increased significantly * I was unable to access my funds * I experienced delays affecting urgent financial obligations To be fair, the support agents themselves have generally been polite and responsive, and they repeatedly confirmed the case is escalated internally. However, the lack of transparency, clear timelines, and practical resolution for such a serious execution issue has honestly been extremely stressful. I’m sharing this mainly to understand: 1. Whether other UAE users faced similar migration/execution issues after Binance Dubai FZE migration 2. How long such cases realistically took to resolve 3. Whether anyone successfully received compensation review for losses caused during unresolved execution issues Would genuinely appreciate hearing others’ experiences. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CryptoMarkets) if you have any questions or concerns.*