MAX

DixonJabooty

I have calls. UAL is way undervalued and crushed Q1 earnings even with the MAX grounding costing them $200 million.

Mountain_Fig_9253

I’m not sure a month is enough time for the next shoe to drop with Boeing, in a way that affects United. Here are the current red flags I see with Boeing: - The FAA could further restrict the production of 737s. They are already down to single digits so there isn’t much more they can restrict and I don’t see this affecting UA. - The MAX 7/10 delays are off the table for the next year or two. That won’t affect UA. - The DOJ investigation is a HUGE potential problem for BA but that won’t have any updates in the next month and won’t affect UA. - The only potential problem I see is the latest allegation of incorrect shimming of the fuselage for the 787 and 777. Now that **could** affect UA if the 787 gets grounded but I highly doubt that’s in the cards. At the worst it will be an AD to inspect the fuselage and that’s probably months away. I’m all for profiting off of BA incompetence, but this might not capture that.

Jeffinslaw

Nice! Curious which contract you bought? I fly with them many times a month and flights are always packed. I know the MAX issues were going to affect them a little bit. Ultimately though I decided to stay out of this ER.

1average_ape

MAX pain has entered the chat

2cents-worth

Well at the very least Airbus planes don’t actively try to commit suicide, unlike the Boeing MCAS equipped MAX planes.

tinnylemur189

No amount of proper procedure would have magically given them knowledge of a system Boeing omitted from their own descriptions of the 737 MAX. Saying CRM played a role is technically true in the way that wind speed and humidity played a role. but the CAUSE was MCAS being trash and the lack of training because boeing didn't want to make pilots required to recertify in order to fly a MAX

Visual-Ad-5053

DEFENSE!!!!!!!DEFENSE!!! 1000 Times cheering NBA NEWS!!! NUGGETS WINS The NBA TITLE 2024! [youtube.com/watch?v=wuRP6A1iJkE](http://youtube.com/watch?v=wuRP6A1iJkE) NUGGETS at SPURS | FULL GAME HIGHLIGHTS | April 12, 2024 LeBron, Lakers will play Zion & Pelicans in Play-In Tournament, winner faces DEN | NBA | UNDISPUTED [youtube.com/watch?v=8W2H5AyM1Vc](http://youtube.com/watch?v=8W2H5AyM1Vc) India/Iran/Israel/USA News >>>Firstpost>>> [youtube.com/watch?v=aAn\_STdzyfQ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aAn_STdzyfQ) >[youtube.com/watch?v=sz3\_Wn4Ocb0](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sz3_Wn4Ocb0) Did Saudi Arabia & UAE Help Israel Defend Against Iran's Attack? | Vantage with Palki Sharma TRUMP TOP NEWS !! [youtube.com/watch?v=3gxq0RyBpro](http://youtube.com/watch?v=3gxq0RyBpro)  Trump finally meets his match as his campaign CRATERS (Brian Tyler Cohen) [youtube.com/watch?v=nZCQoh92sWU](http://youtube.com/watch?v=nZCQoh92sWU) Even after Soana Update fix, Some MEMES are very difficult to sell.  Buy only easy to buy and easy to sell meme on JUPUTER and RAYDIUM. Is this the next BODENLADEN >>>Benji Netanyahoo  . [dexscreener.com/search](https://dexscreener.com/search) Moving Up at the same speed as BODENLADEN started, till 15M MC in one day.  TINY MAX of 10M only !! a fraction of BODENLADEN Max of 690M Same THEME. HOLD!!!!! BENJI Till 20MC Possible with these sped. Try buying on both RAYDIUM AND JUPITER, Refresh your app a few times   TIP: ON Jupiter SWAP, Increase slippage to 1% To sell any MEME, that is hard to sell

Tiffinyrose2989

Sell splits always sell off.. TIP- never let a position go down more than 10-15-% MAX! EVER.. down 10%- takes 11% gain to break even Down 20%- takes 25% gain to break even Down 30% - takes 43% gain to break even Down 40% - takes 67% gain to break even Down 50% - takes 100% gain to break even.. Down 60%- takes 150% gain Down 70% - 233% … Always cut and re enter if you have to but never hold like that especially a small cap with 99% chance of bankruptcy over profitability..

OddMeansToAnEnd

Regard. Open your RH app and click MAX.

SuperMegaGigaUber

They did: it was called the GoPro MAX, and by and large the biggest issue was the software implementation and user experience post-shooting, which is why I think it fell hard to the 360. The fact that people don't know about this product line (which hasn't undergone any sort of product offering update since the original) and the fact that we're at the cusp of another camera announcement for insta360 makes me wonder if GoPro has given up on this section of the market and trying to (maybe) eat some of DJI's section for drones instead?

9999_6666

From the article, “Federal Aviation Administration at the 737 MAX factory in Renton, Washington, found it to be below standards on 33 of 89 parts of the manufacturing process that were examined, according to a presentation obtained by the New York Times. Production of the MAX, Boeing’s best-selling plane, has slowed dramatically.” Yikes. If it’s Boeing, I’m not going.

tjclaussen

Re: MAX Theo Profit .... Agreed. Easy decision for me; i.e. If I can take half of max I do it. Why would I leave the full risk on to gain what is now half of the reward? Also increases the win rate and lets me redeploy in a new trade \[Where my risk is now at full reward\].

OLFRNDS

Now, all of that aside, if the FAA grounds an entire segment of Boeing's fleet, then you'd see the stock dip. It happened not too long ago. I'd probably look into what that did to the stock to get an idea about what a short position could be. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_737_MAX_groundings

seasick__crocodile

>The MAX was returned to service in November 2020 Ok? I’m pointing out that 2019 is an outlier >Air travel has been back to normal for 2 years [Patently false](https://www.iata.org/en/iata-repository/publications/economic-reports/global-outlook-for-air-transport---december-2023---report/). Depending on region, recovery to 2019 levels was last year and this year. In other words, this year is when commercial air traffic will have fully recovered. https://preview.redd.it/0gjcvhb9wotc1.jpeg?width=908&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=405bef8d865fdf670afa57f021b961925cf2cf85 Narrowbodies recovered sooner, of course, but what you’re saying is straight up false. Even if it were true, air travel figures drive aftermarket business in the short term… Not OEM. Im terms of OEM, the supply chain and labor issues stemming from the pandemic still haven’t fully receded, which is why **production and delivery rates are still not at pre-COVID levels**. >Following a more than challenging 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic, 2021-23 were recovery years for the two largest commercial plane makers. Boeing still has quite a way to go before setting new all-time company deliveries records, whereas Airbus could be back to pre-pandemic levels already next year. The years you cited are terrible reference points and everything you said is objectively wrong.

zookeepier

The MAX was returned to service in November 2020. Air travel has been back to normal for 2 years. And even if air travel wasn't back, that's an airline problem, not a Boeing problem. Boeing had a backlog of orders for 10 years. They could keep making and delivering planes, even if 0 people were flying, as long as the airlines didn't cancel orders.

seasick__crocodile

MAX was grounded in 2019 and COVID severely impacted the aerospace industry, so the years you’re using to gauge profitability aren’t really reasonable tbh. If you’re looking for a reference point in terms of their potential (if they get their shit together ofc), you need to look at years prior to 2019. It’s moot if you firmly believe they’ll continue to grapple with the same issues, though.

HighCirrus

Bingo. As you wrote, its not bad contracts, it's bad execution. The question is WHY? Starliner, KC46, Air Force One, T7, 737MAX, now the 777 allegations. My feeling is that investor confidence shouldn't return until Boeing moves its headquarters back to Seattle, puts the engineers back on the factory floor and gets rid of the bureaucratic bloat that hides accountability. Was anyone fired because the door plug bolts were not installed on the 737? If not, its because the system is set up to deflect responsibility, not assign it.

Friedmanite19

Is 737-800 safe in your view? I think ryanair MAX's in their fleet. Currently debating Vueling vs Ryanair for a trip to Barcelona this summer. The ryanair trips are more convenient times but is also Boeing.

MJFields

They impressed me by finally fixing their dogshit UI. I now think MAX is the best of the streaming service UIs, although Netflix has always been pretty good.

Friedmanite19

Not sure where you're from, but the Max-9 doesn't fly in Europe. To my knowledge they fixed the issues with the MCAS. The recent engine cowling had absolutely 0 to do with it being a boeing plane. Tbh I'm also scared of the MAX, but you may not have a choice. Safety is also due to the airline do you not think? Many European airlines with Boeing planes have no fatalities (i.e ryanair)

seasick__crocodile

Lmfao. I don’t own Boeing calls and I’m not out here defending them. The amount of faulty sensors that have plagued MAX in any notable way in the past is one, the AOA sensor when an improper reading caused the MCAS system to pull the plane into a dive. If you want to flag all sensor-related landings in a year, you’re going to have to ground more than just Boeing aircraft (hint: it happens to all of them). You don’t even know what you’re talking about. You watched one documentary or news segment and decided you’re an aerospace expert, huh? I’m keenly aware of the myriad of issues at Boeing. The plane landed because that’s protocol – commercial pilots are required to do it. Before you spout off about a subject you don’t understand, do yourself a favor and look up how many emergency landings happen in a given day. Sit the fuck down and quit embarrassing yourself…

seasick__crocodile

I agree with your conclusion, but the reasons you cited are pretty hit or miss. Their issue on defense is not really poor contracts… It’s poor execution (i.e. T-7 delays, various KC-46 issues over the years, etc.), missing out on FLRAA (went to Bell’s V-280), FARA getting canceled. The picture there is mixed and long term success will come down to execution going forward, NGAD program selection, and NGAS program (last two not really worth speculating about this early). Further tanker orders are anticipated ahead of NGAS, so that’s a plus… On the commercial OE sidE, I’m not sure where you’re getting info about bad contacts, though I suppose there are likely some... If anyone has gotten bad contracts, it’s their suppliers that got locked into long-term pricing before the high inflation kicked in. They weren’t exactly flexible for any suppliers that weren’t sole source. Inventory issues are largely an industry problem due to supply chain issues (mostly on the engine side right now) that have been taking a long time to subside… They’ve only delivered one 777 this year so far as others wait for GE engines. Though stocking for their 737 ramp prior to rates being stalled hurts, too. They weren’t at “full” production to begin with as they were early in a multi-year ramp up on MAX, but the FAA has stalled rate hikes and it’s anyone’s guess how long that will take. Aftermarket is doing fine and may even get a *slim* benefit from its inability to ramp deliveries (as older aircraft remain in service and in need of repairs), though it’s probably immaterial. the good news there is that demand for aircraft remains strong enough that these older planes will keep flying for awhile. Aftermarket is where the margins come from for most aero companies, so you’re right about needing to lean on that segment. The next year is going to be tough for Boeing, at the very least. That being said, it’s not lost on many how irreplaceable they are in the aero market, so it’s hard to say how far down the stock will go.

Warm_Tzatziki

I fucked at work badly. I resigned, doing my last 3 weeks, but fuck shit hit the fan. 2 years of great performance to watch my projects and reputation falling apart like a 777MAX

1average_ape

MAX pain time calls broke me yesterday puts today save me

Dead_Or_Alive

I bought in during the last downturn after the MAX disaster and sold a few weeks before the latest one. I made money but be ready to be in it for the long haul. Fixing an airline manufacturer is not simple or easy and who knows how many of Boeings past fuck ups lurk in the shadows.

Flemingcool

The issue Boeing have is that although this incident has nothing to do with them, the media and public are running with it as being further evidence that Boeing quality is in the bin. Boeing have got to this place by trashing their own reputation with cost cutting, and ignoring real issues that cost lives (MAX crashes). The saying used to be “If it ain’t Boeing, I ain’t going”. It’s now “I’d it’s Boeing, I ain’t going”. I don’t know how they roll this back.

pheoxs

A lot of this isn’t entirely on Boeing as there’s lots of issues creeping up on aircraft’s that have been solid for decades and not solely related to their new MAX designs. One thing we really need to consider is the fact that the airline industry effectively shut down for much of the pandemic which heavily affected maintenance programs. Lots of these planes sat with minimal use and programs didn’t continue having the same level of usage and checks as if they’d been used frequently. Then we had huge labour shortages within the airline industry through ‘22 and probably causing a lot of these issues.

GS_Strategies

If you are bullish for the next week you can do this CREDIT SPRAD on NDX. SELL 120 contracts of the $17930 STRIKE expiring on Friday 12 April 2024 BUY 120 contracts of the $17925 STRIKE expiring on Friday 12 April 2024 You should receive close to $1.67 a share in premium. If you are able to fill your limit order at $1.67 a share then here is what you will win or lose MAX GAIN: $20,040 MAX LOSS: $39,960 The probability of it being OUT OF THE MONEY (this is what you want since you are the net seller of this credit spread) is 66%. Meaning there is a roughly 34% chance you lose it all. \*\*\*These probabilities have proven to be accurate only 70% of the time so there's that. This is a credit spread that assumes you are bullish for the next week. If you were bearish there's a BEAR CALL SPREAD you could do but I'm not going to figure that one out since I'm not bearish. \*\*\*\*I'm not telling you to do this. You asked a theoretical question and I gave you a theoretical answer based on current market prices. Good luck whatever you decide.

verydirtburg

You should watch the documentary “The Rise and Fall of Boeing” on Netflix. It will open your eyes. Employees of Boeing have spoken out about how terrible Boeing is. The workers are begging the company to stop rushing them and cutting corners. The workers at Boeing get in trouble if they put any safety concerns regarding the built planes in writing because Boeing does not want any proof or paper trail of them cutting corners. The people building the damn planes are the ones saying it’s unsafe. “The Federal Aviation Administration found dozens of issues throughout Boeing's 737 MAX jet production process, including mechanics at one of its key suppliers using a hotel key card and dish soap as makeshift tools to test compliance, according to a report.” [Link to article regarding card and soap:](https://nypost.com/2024/03/12/us-news/faa-audit-of-boeings-737-production-found-mechanics-using-hotel-card-and-dish-soap-as-makeshift-tools-report/)

rlfcsf

> Why do investors value stocks that don’t pay any dividends? Because they don’t pay dividends and they grow faster as a result. > I don’t really understand why people would trade stocks don’t pay any dividends because they don’t actually get any value from it Then you do not understand capital appreciation. You have work to do. > I get that people trade these stocks hoping to gain a profit by selling at a higher price to another investor, then that buyer hopes to sell it at a higher price to another investor too and it goes in a loop, but there is still no value to the stock, and people don’t get anything from the stock You claim to understand it then you state you don’t understand it but in reality you just don’t understand. [Here’s a graph of AAPL which never paid a dividend until recently.](https://www.google.com/finance/quote/AAPL:NASDAQ?window=MAX) Do tell, what is difficult to understand about it?

DarthWojak

>It's been involved in numerous successful aircraft designs. Like the 737 MAX, right? Put your money where your mouth is and go all in or shut up.

freakishgnar

NFLX definitely found a way to mass produce content cheaply. And in many respects, you can tell. MAX content is on the whole soooooo much better.

Castello-Ai

The decision to buy Boeing's dip should be carefully considered in light of the company's recent challenges and the potential for a rebound. Here's a summary of the information from the sources provided: 1. **Challenges Faced by Boeing:** The challenges faced by Boeing in 2023 include issues with its defense business, margin pressure, costly charges, manufacturing quality issues, and delivery delays in the commercial airplanes division. These challenges may impact the company's financial objectives and stock attractiveness, raising concerns about its medium-term outlook. 2. **Potential Rebound Factors:** Despite the recent decline in Boeing stock, there are several potential tailwinds that could support a rebound. The recent incident involving a 737 MAX 9 jet in an Alaska Air Group flight may have caused a spike in bearish sentiment, leading to the stock's decline. However, analysts at The Goldman Sachs Group have rolled out an outlook for 2024 that favors a breakout in the United States manufacturing sector, which could benefit Boeing. Additionally, the backlog of orders in the industry is beginning to rise, indicating increasing demand. 3. **Valuation and Market Sentiment:** The recent decline in Boeing stock may have been overdone, as 100% of all the jet orders involve either 737 MAX 8 or MAX 10 jets, and none of these orders include MAX 9 jets. This suggests that the market may be bidding up the stock in anticipation of an earnings beat. The article also discusses the valuation of Boeing and Spirit AeroSystems, noting that both stocks are being punished for the faulty MAX 9 incident, despite the majority of their revenues coming from MAX 8 and 10 models. This could indicate that the market is willing to pay a premium for these stocks, suggesting a potential turnaround.

TheESportsGuy

Dead Americans in a MAX is the only thing that'll drive it down long term. The most powerful institution in the world will prop this turkey up for as long as it has to.

sparklater

But most of the trucks on the lots are the four cylinder Turd-o-MAX model with the 8 speed (until it becomes a seven speed, usually just out of warranty) transmission. At a local dealer out of eighty trucks three were 5.3L, none were 3.0 DM, and 77 were Turd-o-MAX’s. There lies the problem.

Then_Profession8020

I’m gonna convince my friend to say fuck TJ MAX, and go work for NVIDIA, just thinking of all that info 

Then_Profession8020

So my friend turned down her NVIDIA analyst position to work for TJ MAX  I JUST STARTED BLANKLY SEEING HOW ALL THE INSIDER INFO JUST VANISHED 

27Rench27

I mean, you picked halfway up the ramp, but that’s fair, I didn’t look incredibly close because I’m one-handing my phone looking at their MAX chart lol

TheBOME2ishereLBANK

At all cost, AVOID BUYING MEME NOT AT The Exchanges, they are risky and always leads to total loss. CEX listed MEME are SAFE And has unlimited liquidity MOST MEME have a flickering Twitter account. BOME 2 Twitter is legit try it [https://twitter.com/bookofmeme2sol](https://twitter.com/bookofmeme2sol) IF, you see a very fast-moving coin on coin gecko terminal. Do not buy. At may be 1M market cap, they will pull liquidity Never BET ON BTC To go up or DOWN.  Large holders, can place bets for BTC to go down first and then they sell to make it go down. They collect bets profits and buy against the lowest. That is what Sam Bankman-Fried was sentenced Thursday to 25 years in prison for a massive fraud on hundreds of thousands of customers that unraveled with the collapse of FTX, did every day. TIP: WITH 100K very easy to make Millions, Bankman has billions and owned FTX to do the manipulation every day, playing XBOX and laying on a bean bag with Ellison, who ran FTX’s sister hedge fund Alameda Research, pleaded guilty in December 2022 and has yet to face sentencing How to buy BOME 2 in LBANK or BITMART: 500K BUY Volume has been reached already  [https: //www.bitmart.com/en-US](https://www.bitmart.com/en-US)  [https: //www.lbank.com/](https://www.lbank.com/)    Very easy: When you log on, use the buy crypto feature to buy USDT First.  When USDT is credited toward your account. Just search for BOME 2 /USDT Pair. Select the pair. To buy, move the slider up,Use MARKET. This will fill your order very Quickly with a slightly Higher price maybe, 2 USD more: LIMIT price is for 420T MEME with a very high unrealistic Max SUPLY. NOTE, this coin has only 69B MAX. With people buying a few Millions, can sell out very quickly leading to chasing the coin.  BOME Took 2 DAYS TO REACH 2B. People in MEME world is ready to buy and support any Fast-Moving MEME that is not a scam: NOTE, People are still buying with SOLANA as well IF YOU BUY, YOU Benefit, ETH benefit since the most widely used USDT is the ERC20 ETH version, SOLANA benefits since SOL is used to buy. And RAYDIUM And JUPITER swap benefits as well

zxc123zxc123

>but for those who do, it looks like bond market participants (***who are much smarter than your average regard***) Just a reminder that those "bond market participants" are not much smarter than us. They are larger institutions who have much more cash being handled by teams of smarter folks working to achieve different goals. Sure that might mean they have Ivy quants, economists, statisticians, etcetc working with programs, algos, and AI to give them correct choices and outlooks, but they are also limited to their options. Warren Buffett and Berkshire are a player in the bond space. It's not that they LOVE or HATE bonds at 3% in 2019, 0% in 2020-2021, or near 5% now. It's that they have no other option. They can only hold so much AAPL, buy so much of AXP before buying more becomes a bad investment due to high P/E buy, only buy so many companies without SEC getting up in their asses, can only takeover certain companies without the Biden admin blocking them, etcetcetc. The """"""""""""""smart money"""""""""""""" you are talking about who's buying all those US bonds? It's countries. * """"""""""""""smart money"""""""""""""" countries like China and Japan who were holding over a TRILLION in USTs paying 3% in 2019 only to have the dollar get devalued to shit when the Powell and Congress pumped US M2 from $15T to >$21T literally making money free. * Even dumber is that """"""""""""""smart money"""""""""""""" didn't sell their 3% USbonds during the 2020 to buy the dip. * Those """"""""""""""smart money"""""""""""""" also held those bonds as the US kept going through inflation where literally EVERYTHING went up 50%-9001% from burgers to cacao to diapers to stocks. * Not only that, the """"""""""""""smart money"""""""""""""" held those bonds paying 2-3% like the cuckold bitches they are even as the US started paying out 5% rates to crush inflation. * https://www.ceicdata.com/en/china/holdings-of-us-treasury-securities/holdings-of-us-treasury-securities It's not that the """"""""""""""smart money"""""""""""""" are regards. Again they are the equivalent of the US Fed and treasury with the smartest IVY equivs with the best data/tech. It's just that they ***CAN'T*** 0DTE into SPY, buy LEAPS on QQQ, or buy out AAPL. Their own government won't let them, the numbers are too big that even the biggest banks couldn't execute them, and even if they could the US won't let them and everyone is watching their moves. Global central banks and asset managers aren't looking for MAX RETURNS so they can get a yacht, lambos, hookers, and coke when allocating capital. They are looking for risk management and wealth preservation, currency stability, and supporting long term local government goals.

WeepingAndGnashing

No, I’m pointing out that your solution to the problem is asinine. It will be extremely costly and very risky. If it doesn’t work it will bankrupt the company. There is nothing wrong with reusing proven airframes or making modifications to them. It is usually safer because their failure modes and limits are well understood. It also happens to be cheaper, and that’s why most aerospace manufacturers do it. Boeing could have installed a second redundant pitot static sensor on the 737 MAX and that would have prevented both of the fatal crashes. They could have prevented the door plug blowout by having proper inspection processes. None of those things are problems with reusing old airframes. Making a clean sheet design from scratch won’t solve any of those problems. It will however create a whole new set of opportunities to miss things as they go through the learning curve. New is not always better. Doing the right thing and making money is hard. Using your de facto government mandated monopoly to literally get way with murder is way easier. The problems at Boeing aren’t management issues. Anyone who sits in the CEO’s office faces the same broken set of incentives and will make the same bad decisions. The people at the top need to face real consequences for bad behavior like jail time and bankruptcy. Making clean sheet airplanes will solve the problem? You’re special, friend.

WeepingAndGnashing

There’s what’s right for the safety of air travellers and then there’s what’s right for profitability.  This is r/stocks. We are discussing $BA and how to make money off of it, not what it would take to make people feel all warm and fuzzy when they board a Boeing aircraft. To fix their reputation, they’d absolutely have to do what you’re describing. And if they do, it will be a blood bath for their stock.  Imagine the new CEO a month into their new job saying, “yeah, I know we screwed the pooch on the last few programs and we killed a bunch of people with the 737 MAX, so to fix our image so we’re going to make a completely new aircraft, from scratch, new tooling, new engineering, new everything, trust us, we got this.” Yeah, that’s gonna make the stock go up. Good one buddy.

_bloed_

The 787 Max can also be the final nail in the coffin. The front fell off. Again By March 18, every single Boeing 737 MAX plane (387 in total) had been grounded, which affected 8,600 weekly flights operated by 59 airlines across the globe. Seriously buy Airbus.

it-takes-all-kinds

Bring back the MD-80 from the MD vaults in place of them MAX’s yo!

Emergency-Nothing457

Boeing’s problem started way before the MAX. They started when Phil Condit was hired and then they were taken over in their buyout of McDonnell Douglas.

Yellen_NoBailOut

Was on a 737 MAX 8 on Thursday night and was legitimately worried about flying.

WartimeMercy

Except this is a 737-MAX with nonMCAS trained pilots at the controls.

Sempere

"ladies and gentlemen, please return to your seats and keep your seatbelts fastened - we're in for a bumpy ride as we just realized the economy is flying on a 747-MAX. Also suck my 77 year old lady dick, we're going down."

Bomgui

Crash the stock harder than their shitty 737MAX did

Early_Divide3328

If you are a customer of Robinhood - gold is a must have if you plan to always contribute the MAX to your IRA there. It more than makes up for the $5 monthly fee. I discovered that there are still pros and cons to Robinhood compared to Fidelity and other brokerages. For instance the major pro for Robinhood is that there are no additional contract fees for option trades. But the major con for option trades in a taxable brokerage account at Robinhood involves cash covered puts. You will lose that 5% interest on any cash covered puts you sell (there is no double dipping like other brokerage accounts). Also in my retirement account at Robinhood - I don't seem to be getting any interest on my spare cash. So if you want interest on your spare cash in a Robinhood retirement account - you better park it in $SGOV or something similar. Those are the nuances I found at Robinhood. I do like Robinhood - but I find Fidelity just as good.

Sensitive_Expert8974

NEW SUPERXLLEVERAGEDJTETFx100 MAX YOUR DJT 

EnragedMoose

The only planes post-merger management team have produced are the 737 MAX and the 787. Both had issues. 777 was before them. They killed 757/767. Haven't done shit with the rumored 797. Clowns.

Przedrzag

He was the fall guy for the previous CEO who oversaw the vast majority of MAX development

BB_night

Nothing's going to change there without a major shakeup of middle and upper-management. The C-suite is only a very small part of a highly-systemic and deep-rooted corporate culture problem at Boeing and IMO it's going to take years to fix. There's an excellent documentary on Netflix called Downfall: The Case Against Boeing. I highly recommend it if you want to learn about the greed for profits overtaking safety at that company, especially affecting the 737 MAX airplane, but I wouldn't be shocked to hear of other corner-cutting at Boeing either.

mokdemos

5000 MAX flights per day...yeah dude it's a frickin bloodbath out there. Stick with Spirit and JetBlue if you're that worried though, no Boeing planes to worry about.

TheNewOP

This changes nothing. The core issues are still there, he's just a scapegoat who joined after the 737 MAX incidents.

MOIST_MAN

How are we going to explain Dennis muilenberg who was a lifetime Boeing engineer before becoming CEO and presiding over the MAX crisis?

Caberes

I think people are just fed up with the Jack Welch disciples. Most of the big issues have been a result of the decision to cut corner with the 737 successor which resulted in the 737 MAX which I think you can blame on McNerney. With that said, I still stand with Muilenburg being a fall guy.

paone00022

The guy who got fired before Calhoun was Dennis Muilenburg. He got fired for the MAX fiasco. Dennis was actually an Aeronautics engineer.

gnocchicotti

Just load up on far OTM puts for the next time a 737 MAX crashes.

AllCatCoverBand

Don’t say that too loud. I am literally on a 737 MAX right now

enfuego138

They haven’t learned anything. They’ve replaced the head of commercial air with Stephanie Pope, who was VP there from 2020-2022 and who has an accounting degree and MBA. She was a core part of the leadership team that did nothing after the 737 MAX was grounded, she’ll doing little to nothing now. Bean counters replace with bean counters.

vada_buffet

Some really fascinating insights into Boeing in John Oliver's LWT segment of all places. Convinced me to never fly on 737 MAX and 787 Dreamliner planes. Is this an actual shake up or just a moving around the deck chairs kind of situation?

This-Acanthisitta681

After conducting comprehensive research on KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR), here's a detailed analysis based on the criteria provided: ### 1. Fundamental Analysis: - **Historical Earnings and Future Potential**: KULR is forecasted to break even in 2026, with significant revenue growth expected in the coming years. The company has been actively participating in equity offerings to raise funds, which indicates ongoing efforts to scale operations and enhance technological capabilities [oai_citation:1,KULR Technology Group (NYSEAM:KULR) - Stock Price, News & Analysis - Simply Wall St](https://simplywall.st/stocks/us/capital-goods/nysemkt-kulr/kulr-technology-group). - **Financial Stability**: KULR has faced financial challenges, evident from receiving non-compliance notices from the NYSE American, though it has received acceptance of a compliance plan recently. These indicators suggest a company working through its financial stability issues [oai_citation:2,KULR Technology Group (NYSEAM:KULR) - Stock Price, News & Analysis - Simply Wall St](https://simplywall.st/stocks/us/capital-goods/nysemkt-kulr/kulr-technology-group). - **Dividend Policies**: There's no mention of current dividend policies, indicating that KULR may not be distributing dividends at this stage, which is common for growth-focused companies investing heavily in R&D and expansion. ### 2. Valuation: - **Stock Valuation**: With the stock price forecasted to potentially increase by 346.43% to a target of $1.00, and current valuation metrics, it suggests that analysts might see the stock as undervalued [oai_citation:3,KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) Stock Forecast & Price Targets - Stock Analysis](https://stockanalysis.com/stocks/kulr/forecast/). ### 3. Industry and Sector Performance: - **Position in the Sector**: KULR has underperformed compared to the US Electrical industry and the US Market over the past year, but the company's initiatives in aerospace applications and energy management indicate potential for future growth [oai_citation:4,KULR Technology Group (NYSEAM:KULR) - Stock Price, News & Analysis - Simply Wall St](https://simplywall.st/stocks/us/capital-goods/nysemkt-kulr/kulr-technology-group). ### 4. Management and Corporate Governance: - **Management Competence**: The strategic moves, such as compliance efforts and equity offerings, suggest a proactive management team. However, detailed evaluations of management's experience and governance practices were not covered in the available information. ### 5. Growth Potential: - **Innovations and Market Expansions**: The introduction of KULR ONE MAX at CES 2024 and ventures into aerospace applications demonstrate KULR's commitment to innovation and market expansion [oai_citation:5,KULR Technology Group (NYSEAM:KULR) - Stock Price, News & Analysis - Simply Wall St](https://simplywall.st/stocks/us/capital-goods/nysemkt-kulr/kulr-technology-group). ### 6. Market Conditions and Economic Factors: - **Impact Analysis**: Current information doesn't specify how recent economic factors or market conditions have directly impacted KULR, but the tech sector is generally sensitive to these changes. ### 7. Technical Analysis: - KULR's stock has shown volatility, with its price movements indicating potential risk for short-term investors but possibly rewarding for those with a long-term perspective [oai_citation:6,KULR Technology Group (NYSEAM:KULR) - Stock Price, News & Analysis - Simply Wall St](https://simplywall.st/stocks/us/capital-goods/nysemkt-kulr/kulr-technology-group). ### 8. Risk Assessment: - **Volatility and Risks**: KULR's share price has been volatile, which aligns with its status as a growth-oriented tech company facing industry-specific risks [oai_citation:7,KULR Technology Group (NYSEAM:KULR) - Stock Price, News & Analysis - Simply Wall St](https://simplywall.st/stocks/us/capital-goods/nysemkt-kulr/kulr-technology-group). ### 9. Competitive Advantage: - **Sustainable Edge**: KULR's focus on sustainable energy management and thermal solutions for challenging environments like space missions suggests a niche competitive advantage. ### 10. News and Events: - Recent developments include strategic partnerships for aerospace applications and equity offerings, indicating active efforts towards growth and compliance with financial regulations [oai_citation:8,KULR Technology Group (NYSEAM:KULR) - Stock Price, News & Analysis - Simply Wall St](https://simplywall.st/stocks/us/capital-goods/nysemkt-kulr/kulr-technology-group). ### Estimated Price Range and Analyst Recommendations: - The sole analyst covering KULR suggests a "Buy" with a 12-month price forecast of $1.00, indicating a significant potential upside from the current stock price [oai_citation:9,KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) Stock Forecast & Price Targets - Stock Analysis](https://stockanalysis.com/stocks/kulr/forecast/). ### Growth Likelihood in the Next 90 Days: Given the current data, categorizing the likelihood of significant growth in the next 90 days is challenging without short-term forecasts. However, considering the long-term growth potential and ongoing strategic initiatives, there is optimism for growth, albeit with a cautious outlook due to past volatility and financial challenges. This analysis covers a range of factors influencing KULR's potential, from financial stability and market position to growth prospects and risk assessment. For investors, aligning these factors with personal investment strategy and tolerance for risk is crucial.

Low-Wash-4036

I’m not asking for that lol I added that as an example of something I saw on the internet that was a dead end. Personally, I don’t have a trust fund, family wealth, a great job, or anything like that. I’m living check-to-check in Detroit, MI. I’m wondering how, if any of you were ever in the same boat as me, did you manage to turn only being able to save $200/week MAX (between two people) into being legit investors? If ur only here to talk trash or be rude then please go to a different subreddit. Anybody can use google/chatGPT and then come back here and be condescending. I’m looking for a seasoned vet’s advice, thanks.

pmekonnen

aricle from March 1st Boeing (BA.N) is in talks to buy its struggling former subsidiary Spirit AeroSystems (SPR.N), as both companies try to solve persistent quality problems and contain costs related to 737 MAX production, an industry source familiar with the matter said on Friday.

maiden_fan

>VTSAX Doesn't seem right: https://www.google.com/finance/quote/VTSAX:MUTF?hl=en&window=MAX

maiden_fan

VOO seems close to 10% but it's only been around since 2011. VTI seems to be nowhere near 10% CAGR given it's inception since 2001: https://www.google.com/finance/quote/VTI:NYSEARCA?hl=en&window=MAX

MiamiRalph

LET'S RALLY HARD!! MAX OUT THE CASH ADVANCES ON THE CREDIT CARDS TAKE OUT A HELOC ON THE HOUSE DRAIN YOUR RETIREMENT ACCOUNTS PULL OUT A MORTGAGE ON GRANNY'S HOUSE GME LEVELS OR BUST!!! If you don't go hard after the tendies, you'll never be remembered!

NormanClegg

Boeing is developing the Boeing Y1 to replace the 737 and 757 product lines, with the Y1 covering the 100–250-passenger market. The Y1 is expected to have an elliptical composite fuselage, new engines, and improved aerodynamics. Boeing initially targeted a launch date of 2020, but later shelved the project in favor of developing the 737 MAX. Boeing is also developing a new single-aisle jet with NASA that could replace the 737 Max. The plane's design and engine technology could reduce fuel consumption and emissions by about 30% compared to the 737 Max and Airbus's A320neo. Boeing plans to fly a full-scale prototype of the jet later this decade.

MiamiRalph

LET'S RALLY HARD!! MAX OUT THE CASH ADVANCES ON THE CREDIT CARDS TAKE OUT A HELOC ON THE HOUSE DRAIN YOUR RETIREMENT ACCOUNTS PULL OUT A MORTGAGE ON GRANNY'S HOUSE GME LEVELS OR BUST!!! ​ this is not financial advice... but if you don't go hard you'll never be remembered

Mighty-HeaIthy

DELL should be $60/share **MAX** wtf is this

ChirrBirry

It’s taking off like a 737 MAX

diseasexx

That’s MAX he can get

radragantav

Where? I saw 3/4 of it, loved it, MAX took it away

TheKingofTheKings123

Airbus are ridiculously backlogged. Despite recent troubles Boeing are still getting MAX orders and 777X orders even though this plane is taking stupidly long to certify.

OakMeisterCA

That was me in 2020. I had large BA losses ($100k+) on puts because of their MAX grounding and then the pandemic. I've banned myself from new trades on it - was tempted to lift the ban a few months ago and in the last few weeks I've been very happy to not have it.

Calfis

Was it a 737 MAX?

TheKingofTheKings123

Not even a MAX, sounds like a maintenance thing.

lildumplingzzz

i landed that one, and another 787-9MAX and Dreamliner this morning. so far, still here

Nikvest

I swear this could be a 1hr presentation MAX

Carbon-Base

This is a good point. It's very clear BA does not care for its public image from what we've seen and heard in a couple of years. The MAX planes have had serious issues in the past, and a few concerning issues recently. First it was a "software" problem, and now we are seeing "hardware" problems prominently. It's very clear that BA is not a company of engineers and researchers, but rather, a company made up of business executives siphoning out as much money as they can from buyers, contractors and shareholders. Their QC is not what it used to be, failing 33 of 89 audits is proof of that. What's worse is that they are doing nothing to improve those issues or their public image. Which doesn't paint a good picture for shareholders.

waxisfun

After the 737MAX crash in 2019, I had the same exact thought and bought some. Un fortunately it *kept dropping* I figured I'd keep hold of it long term even when the CEO of Boeing stated that the company stock probably will not bounce back to 2018 levels until 2028. With these latest issues they've hit rock bottom and continue to dig. I decided I was done and that the lose of money would at least offset any gains when tax time rolls around

UsuallylurknotToday

VIX was created by the same people that gave us the MAX airplanes that kept falling out of the sky. ^(not actually)

wildcat12321

it isn't the US's control, but they can certainly influence -- Ex/Im bank, Civil Reserve Air Fleet incentives, etc. They can continue to subsidize "research" or other areas if they really needed to. I highly doubt BCA will go under. The MAX may have many issues, but it isn't the only plane being offered and airbus does not have the capacity to take 100% of the market.

rook2pawn

Dateline NBC: He bought his wife a plane ticket.. on a Boeing Airplane. Was he plotting to kill her? Watch now as a group of 12 jurors determine a MAX flight leads to a MAX sentence.

InternalVolatility

737MAX skydiver

3rd-Grade-Spelling

Interesting WBD is trading at about 3X cashflow. WBD has too many franchises to be a value trap IMO, but I think AMCX Might be. The only big franchise I can think of AMCX having is The Waking dead, and I don't even know if that can be rebooted every few years like Batman is on WBD. I forget which one it was, but I read a while ago one of the big phone/internet/cable companies is discontinuing new installs of phone and cable and only installing internet now. Will people sign up for AMC+? I love Horror, so I looked into shudder, and decided it just wasn't worth it as there is enough and higher quality Horror on Peacock, Hulu, Paramount+, MAX, & Netflix. Any 2 of those would be better than Shudder IMO. Even Youtube premium did a horror push last October which had some impressive stuff. AMCX looks real cheap, but is revenue going to be cut in half and profit down 75% by 2030? I don't see it as a takeover either because of all the debt. Do we know how much Netflix Pays AMCX to stream Breaking Bad which as it gets older would be a depreciating asset?

Cuck-In-Chief

Yeah. My wife leaves for a week on a MAX-7. I avoided booking on an 8 because of the software issue. Now the 7’s have hull problems. I’m almost certain I would’ve booked her on an Airbus. If we weren’t doing cross-country I’d have looked for a regional jet like Bombardier. That said, odds are in our favor and I’m not worried. But the odds are looking less favorable with every in air catastrophe.

2Chris

Consumer sentiment catching up, and it’s nowhere in their value estimates. Adam Smith’s invisible hand is coming to bitch slap them in the face. I know people booking flights that refuse to book a MAX plane, and I don’t want to fly on one either. Airbus had their struggles, and now they are turning into the better option even though they are older less “advanced” planes.

BeljicaPeak

This the one? March 8, 737 MAX 8. https://avherald.com/h?article=515e3618&opt=0. “A passenger reported the aircraft had landed normally and in normal attitude, when the crew attempted to turn off the aircraft was too fast, skidded, the gear collapsed and the aircraft went off onto soft ground“

N0bb1

Sadly 0. For bigger aircrafts there only is Airbus and Boeing, so Boeing is too big to fail. Sure there is Bombardier but that is not competing in the large jet market. Maybe, eventually we might see challengers from Brazil, Japan and China rise to the ocasion and grab market shares for new contracts from Boeing, but that is only if Boeings problems persist for the next couple of years with complete grounding for an aircraft type like for the 737MAX, because only then will they switch, when they actually lost money

JonFrost

> This has resulted in a shortfall of 80 MAX 10s for 2024 due to production issues and certifications. To mitigate this issue and keep their flight schedules on track, United is considering Airbus A321neos as a stopgap solution. However, there is skepticism about Airbus's capacity to meet this increase in demand. Well in the article... > United had approached Airbus about buying A321neo jets as possible alternatives to its MAX 10 order but the planemaker's order book is full through 2030. ...they make it seem quite clear airbus cannot build neos for United

Prof_PTokyo

The information, slightly outdated, just reiterates United Airlines' delays of the 737 MAX 10 deliveries. Originally planned for delivery in 2024, the 37 MAX 10s are now delayed until post-2025. This has resulted in a shortfall of 80 MAX 10s for 2024 due to production issues and certifications. To mitigate this issue and keep their flight schedules on track, United is considering Airbus A321neos as a stopgap solution. However, there is skepticism about Airbus's capacity to meet this increase in demand. United Airlines has reportedly asked Boeing to prioritize resolving all MAX 10 issues, even if it means additional delays. United has made it clear that it will not accept any MAX 10 planes until all problems are thoroughly resolved. Despite the hurdles, UA still expects delivery of 37 Boeing 737-8s and 19 737-9s in 2024, with an additional mix of 21 aircraft slated for 2025. This demonstrates United's flexibility in fleet management approach. They will get the planes they need.

hotsoddy

“Unlike the Airbus A350, a completely new design, Boeing's next-generation 777X builds off the successful track record of its classic 777 planes” Ring any MAX bells?

ThatGuy571

Well, y’know, despite that pesky MCAS thing. Or the constant problems the FAA found during the 2+ year recertification process the MAX went through. Or the exemptions and waivers they requested for said problems the FAA found. Or those silly Dreamliner batteries. Or the other doors they found to be improperly assembled. Boeing doesn’t produce the same quality product they used to. It’s time to hold them to that and expect better. While aviation accidents are still rare, a single one kills hundreds and forever changes the lives of thousands. Aviation safety isn’t something you can skimp on and pretend it won’t be catastrophic. Murphy’s Law will come back to bite us all in the ass eventually if Boeing is allowed to continue this disregard for quality.

iamapotatopancake

jesus christ... I'm supposed to be flying to and from Arizona in a boeing 737 MAX in a little over month............. fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu........

ZeePirate

And that’s generally not the case with Boeings older aircraft the flaws have been worked out. Not true for the MAX or Dreamliner. But everything else is pretty dang tried and true

FxMastery

Ahahah Europe and Américan and some Autority stop All the 737 MAX a this Time, you even don’t know All their business problem, They sales plane faster and faster, change 3 pièces on a plane to say « Yeah it’s the Brand New Boeing » Wow bro im felling sorry for u, wish you All the best, wish u to use a bit a ur brain. If someone you know were in those 2 plane maybe your comment Will never wrote Ps: my English bad 😓

mcconohay

It was a 25 year-old 737. Not a MAX. To have a picture of a MAX in this article is misleading. To blame this on Boeing is fucking stupid.