Reddit Posts
Mentions
yep: Figured I’d post this here looking for help, more sources and validation in this. A video of Hal Finney giving a presentation surfaced from Crypto 98 I found the event program info page and found that there was a man there named Satoshi Hada and Toshiaki Tanaka https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/646763.706338 We can finally pinpoint that there was a Satoshi in the same building with Hal Finney at a Crypto event in 1998. I then Googled "Satoshi Hada Naka Moto" I found one tweet who also pieced this together with no replies at the time. He also put the names of the research papers together https://twitter.com/H_D_BE_2002/status/1742628299489137069 He linked a research paper with the following names on it talking about public and private keys (you have to view it in archive.org) https://researcher.draco.res.ibm.com/researcher/view_person_subpage.php?id=899 Satoshi: SATOSHI Hada Naka: Toshiaki TaNAKA Moto: Naohiko UraMOTO Now put all 3 names together - Satoshi Naka Moto I then started researching the names and things like projects and timelines all check out. It is funny that while all these names talk about public, private keys, blockchain and crypto, NONE talk about Bitcoin. I then googled "satoshi hada" Cypherpunk to see if he was part of that and an email surfaced here from December 2001. https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xenc-xmlp-tf/2001Dec/0001.html I then went to Satoshi Hada's twitter here https://twitter.com/satoshihada His tweet from 2017 caught my eye, someone made a comment in backwards text in 2021 saying Satoshin Nakamoto almost 3 years to the day of my discovery It looks possible that Satoshi Nakamoto is a combination of at least 3 people that were IBM researchers involved in early blockchain research work that predates bitcoin. OR it can be another person or group that admired their work and took a piece of each of their names. I believe Hal Finney was not Satoshi Nakamoto and he also did not know him personally based on interviews with Fran Finney. I believe he was on that mailing list that when the white paper went out, saw it and got involved. I also feel these 3 men worked on it and moved on to other things with their lives and kept it a secret!
DISCUSSION New theory on Satoshi Nakamoto (self.CryptoCurrency) submitted 23 hours ago by christofooch0 / 0 🦠 Figured I’d post this here looking for help, more sources and validation in this. A video of Hal Finney giving a presentation surfaced from Crypto 98 I found the event program info page and found that there was a man there named Satoshi Hada and Toshiaki Tanaka https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/646763.706338 We can finally pinpoint that there was a Satoshi in the same building with Hal Finney at a Crypto event in 1998. I then Googled "Satoshi Hada Naka Moto" I found one tweet who also pieced this together with no replies at the time. He also put the names of the research papers together https://twitter.com/H_D_BE_2002/status/1742628299489137069 He linked a research paper with the following names on it talking about public and private keys (you have to view it in archive.org) https://researcher.draco.res.ibm.com/researcher/view_person_subpage.php?id=899 Satoshi: SATOSHI Hada Naka: Toshiaki TaNAKA Moto: Naohiko UraMOTO Now put all 3 names together - Satoshi Naka Moto I then started researching the names and things like projects and timelines all check out. It is funny that while all these names talk about public, private keys, blockchain and crypto, NONE talk about Bitcoin. I then googled "satoshi hada" Cypherpunk to see if he was part of that and an email surfaced here from December 2001. https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xenc-xmlp-tf/2001Dec/0001.html I then went to Satoshi Hada's twitter here https://twitter.com/satoshihada His tweet from 2017 caught my eye, someone made a comment in backwards text in 2021 saying Satoshin Nakamoto almost 3 years to the day of my discovery It looks possible that Satoshi Nakamoto is a combination of at least 3 people that were IBM researchers involved in early blockchain research work that predates bitcoin. OR it can be another person or group that admired their work and took a piece of each of their names. I believe Hal Finney was not Satoshi Nakamoto and he also did not know him personally based on interviews with Fran Finney. I believe he was on that mailing list that when the white paper went out, saw it and got involved. I also feel these 3 men worked on it and moved on to other things with their lives and kept it a secret! 239 commentssharesavehidereportcrosspost
> Satoshi: SATOSHI Hada Naka: Toshiaki TaNAKA Moto: Naohiko UraMOTO i had to re-read this line so many times because you didn't put line breaks. i think this is supposed to read: Satoshi: SATOSHI Hada Naka: Toshiaki TaNAKA Moto: Naohiko UraMOTO
Dwayne The Rock Johnson is SATOSHI????
Dorian Nakamoto lived 3 blocks from Hal Finney. SATOSHI WAS DOXXED IN 2014 AND HAD TO RETRACT. Horrible boondoogle of work. >Prentice ***Satoshi Nakamoto, a 64-year old ex-engineer and programmer*** living in the small exurb of Los Angeles known as Temple City. [Nakamoto had even seemed to give *Newsweek* a tacit confirmation of its theory when he told the magazine's reporter](http://mag.newsweek.com/2014/03/14/bitcoin-satoshi-nakamoto.html) that he was **"no longer involved in that,"** a quote confirmed in essence by local police who witnessed the interaction. >Just hours after *Newsweek*'s story hit the Web, I received an email from an old cryptography community acquaintance of Finney's who has asked to remain anonymous. The email was titled **"What are the odds?"** ***It pointed out that Hal Finney had lived for almost a decade in Temple City, the same 36,000 person town where Newsweek found Dorian Nakamoto. Finney's address was only a few blocks away from the Nakamoto's family home.*** [https://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2014/03/25/satoshi-nakamotos-neighbor-the-bitcoin-ghostwriter-who-wasnt/?sh=6f30489f4a37](https://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2014/03/25/satoshi-nakamotos-neighbor-the-bitcoin-ghostwriter-who-wasnt/?sh=6f30489f4a37) [https://www.newsweek.com/2014/03/14/face-behind-bitcoin-247957.html](https://www.newsweek.com/2014/03/14/face-behind-bitcoin-247957.html)
https://dl.acm.org/profile/81100626271 Satoshi Hada - IBM research. -> look at colleague collaborations = Toshiaka Tanaka (KDDI Research) -> Most frequent co-author = Sinsaku Kiyomoto (KDDI Research). SATOSHI NAKAMOTO. Both Satoshi and Toshiaka stopped publishing in 2010. Whilst Sinsaku is still publishing to this day. This last guy who seems to be still active is publishing papers about blockchain, hashrate and a lot of other computer science cryptology stuff: https://scholar.google.ch/citations?user=ddUqg-AAAAAJ&hl=el I think Satoshi Hada and Toshiaka Tanaka are Satoshi Nakamoto and made Bitcoin. That’s why they went off-grid in 2010. They probably own a lot of the invention to their co-author and researcher Sinsaku Kiyomoto, which is why his name is partly used in the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto. That or Sinsaku did not have any stake or much involvement after the initial idea was formed. Which is why he did not feel the need to go off the grid and continue his research in the field.
This is silly. Bitcoin is infinitely divisible. That's not why it's silly though. Bitcoin has a total market capitalisation that goes UP WHILE THE PRICE OF INDIVIDUAL BITCOINS DOES which makes bitcoin SAFER as an investment because it means sky-high demand which is what the fear is supposed to about - that demand will not exist. You purchase a share of the total outstanding available bitcoin and fixating on what ONE bitcoin costs is silly. It's an arbitrary subdivision. You might as well be fearmongering about what ALL bitcoin costs (the total capitalisation) or what ONE SATOSHI costs. This "one bitcoin costs x which is a lot" fixation is absolutely silly and means nothing. The total capitalisation is the REAL number. 1 Bitcoin is just where the decimalisations are. 210 million bitcoins could've been issued instead of 21 million and the market capitalisation (AND THE OUTCOMES OF INVESTMENT) would be \*exactly the same\*.....
"The root problem with conventional currency is all the trust that's required to make it work. The central bank must be trusted not to debase the currency, but the history of fiat currencies is full of breaches of that trust. Banks must be trusted to hold our money and transfer it electronically, but they lend it out in waves of credit bubbles with barely a fraction in reserve. We have to trust them with our privacy, trust them not to let identity thieves drain our accounts. Their massive overhead costs make micropayments impossible." -SATOSHI fuck the ETFs self custody your bitcoin
Yes yes I agree, this is my great reveal !!! I AM SATOSHI!!! YESYES !!!
#Bitcoin Cash Pro-Arguments Below is a Bitcoin Cash pro-argument written by Blendzi0r. > # What is Bitcoin Cash (BCH)? > > Bitcoin Cash is a [hard fork](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/h/hard-fork.asp) of Bitcoin. It was launched in 2017. [It has 32MB blocks instead of Bitcoin’s 1MB](https://www.coindesk.com/learn/2015/08/21/what-is-the-bitcoin-block-size-debate-and-why-does-it-matter/), so it can handle many more transactions per second (TPS). And that’s the main difference between BTC and BCH, as its goal was to tackle [Bitcoin’s scalability problem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitcoin_scalability_problem) without the second layer solutions. > > # What are the pros of BCH? > > ​ > > **IT’S MORE SCALABLE THAN BITCOIN** > > As mentioned in the introduction, BCH has bigger blocks than Bitcoin. It allows the network to handle more than 200 TPS compared to Bitcoin’s 7. [Transactions on Bitcoin Cash are faster and transaction fees are lower](https://www.investopedia.com/tech/bitcoin-vs-bitcoin-cash-whats-difference/#citation-4). > > The average transaction fee on BCH network usually stays substantially below one cent while an average transaction fee on Bitcoin network is usually much above $2 and during congestion, like earlier this year, can even reach [more than $60](https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/bitcoin-transactionfees.html). > > ​ > > **IT’S BASED ON BITCOIN…** > > As a hard fork of Bitcoin, BCH offers many benefits of Bitcoin fundamentals, like anonymity, reliability (they both use the same cryptographic hash functions - [Secure Hash Algorithm 2](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHA-2)), limited number of coins that will ever be issued ([21 million](https://decrypt.co/34876/why-is-bitcoins-supply-limit-set-to-21-million), same as Bitcoin) and, last but not least, the codebase. > > ​ > > **… BUT IT HAS MORE FUNCTIONS AND UPGRADES…** > > BCH is utilizing smart contracts, including [Cashscript](https://cashscript.org/). Cashscript will bring [DeFi](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decentralized_finance) into Bitcoin Cash, so it might compete with other DeFi platforms. There are also other developments like CashSuffle and CashFusion that [further improve privacy on social networks](https://changelly.com/blog/btc-vs-bch/). > > And while Bitcoin had it's last upgrade in 2017, Bitcoin Cash is upgraded regularly. The [last upgrade](https://news.bitcoin.com/bitcoin-cash-upgrades-successfully-network-works-as-intended/) was applied in May this year and was focused on improving the user-experience and double-spending protection. BCH developers are also aware of the past tensions that resulted in hard forks and decided to implement [CHIPs](https://bch.info/en/chips) that are supposed to make future upgrades more off-centered, independent and overall smoother. > > ​ > > **… AND IT’S CLOSER TO WHAT SATOSHI NAKAMOTO INTENDED** > > In July 2017 [Roger Ver](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Ver) and others stated they felt that adopting BIP 91 (that would later activate [SegWit](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/segwit-segregated-witness.asp)) favored people who wanted to treat bitcoin as a digital investment rather than as a transactional currency. That's why Bitcoin Cash was created. > > In the [whitepaper](https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf), Satoshi Nakamoto intended Bitcoin to be a transactional currency - “an electronic cash system". But today, it needs to rely on the second layer solutions in order to achieve that, therefore [some people argue](https://www.newsbtc.com/news/bitcoin/roger-ver-bitcoin-cash-is-a-better-investment-than-bitcoin/) that Bitcoin Cash is closer to what Nakamoto described. > > ​ > > **IT’S ONE OF THE MOST ACCEPTED CRYPTOCURRENCIES** > > As of 21.10.2021, [1168 merchants accept Bitcoin Cash](https://acceptbitcoin.cash/). And despite the fact that Bitcoin has risen in value since the hard fork while Bitcoin Cash has dropped in value a little, it’s still one of the most popular coins and the project is continuously developed. > > ​ > > **SUMMARY** > > Although Bitcoin Cash supporters claim that it can do whatever Bitcoin does but better and although it is one of the most popular cryptocurrencies that is constantly updated, it's impossible to deny the fact that it has lost against Bitcoin when it comes to adoption. And, unfortunately for BCH, it's all about adoption. ***** Would you like to learn more? Check out the [Cointest archive](/r/CointestOfficial/wiki/cointest_archive#wiki_Bitcoin_Cash) to find submissions for other topics.
Extra Satoshi's will always be extra SATOSHI'S
YOU OWN EVERY SINGLE SATOSHI & NOBODY can take IT away from you but yourself. Of course, you need to take them off the exchange.
YES, absolutely! you'll have a millions SATOSHI's with this portfolio. And tell your friends as well. We need more like you.
#Bitcoin Cash Pro-Arguments Below is a Bitcoin Cash pro-argument written by Blendzi0r. > # What is Bitcoin Cash (BCH)? > > Bitcoin Cash is a [hard fork](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/h/hard-fork.asp) of Bitcoin. It was launched in 2017. [It has 32MB blocks instead of Bitcoin’s 1MB](https://www.coindesk.com/learn/2015/08/21/what-is-the-bitcoin-block-size-debate-and-why-does-it-matter/), so it can handle many more transactions per second (TPS). And that’s the main difference between BTC and BCH, as its goal was to tackle [Bitcoin’s scalability problem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitcoin_scalability_problem) without the second layer solutions. > > # What are the pros of BCH? > > ​ > > **IT’S MORE SCALABLE THAN BITCOIN** > > As mentioned in the introduction, BCH has bigger blocks than Bitcoin. It allows the network to handle more than 200 TPS compared to Bitcoin’s 7. [Transactions on Bitcoin Cash are faster and transaction fees are lower](https://www.investopedia.com/tech/bitcoin-vs-bitcoin-cash-whats-difference/#citation-4). > > The average transaction fee on BCH network usually stays substantially below one cent while an average transaction fee on Bitcoin network is usually much above $2 and during congestion, like earlier this year, can even reach [more than $60](https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/bitcoin-transactionfees.html). > > ​ > > **IT’S BASED ON BITCOIN…** > > As a hard fork of Bitcoin, BCH offers many benefits of Bitcoin fundamentals, like anonymity, reliability (they both use the same cryptographic hash functions - [Secure Hash Algorithm 2](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHA-2)), limited number of coins that will ever be issued ([21 million](https://decrypt.co/34876/why-is-bitcoins-supply-limit-set-to-21-million), same as Bitcoin) and, last but not least, the codebase. > > ​ > > **… BUT IT HAS MORE FUNCTIONS AND UPGRADES…** > > BCH is utilizing smart contracts, including [Cashscript](https://cashscript.org/). Cashscript will bring [DeFi](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decentralized_finance) into Bitcoin Cash, so it might compete with other DeFi platforms. There are also other developments like CashSuffle and CashFusion that [further improve privacy on social networks](https://changelly.com/blog/btc-vs-bch/). > > And while Bitcoin had it's last upgrade in 2017, Bitcoin Cash is upgraded regularly. The [last upgrade](https://news.bitcoin.com/bitcoin-cash-upgrades-successfully-network-works-as-intended/) was applied in May this year and was focused on improving the user-experience and double-spending protection. BCH developers are also aware of the past tensions that resulted in hard forks and decided to implement [CHIPs](https://bch.info/en/chips) that are supposed to make future upgrades more off-centered, independent and overall smoother. > > ​ > > **… AND IT’S CLOSER TO WHAT SATOSHI NAKAMOTO INTENDED** > > In July 2017 [Roger Ver](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Ver) and others stated they felt that adopting BIP 91 (that would later activate [SegWit](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/segwit-segregated-witness.asp)) favored people who wanted to treat bitcoin as a digital investment rather than as a transactional currency. That's why Bitcoin Cash was created. > > In the [whitepaper](https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf), Satoshi Nakamoto intended Bitcoin to be a transactional currency - “an electronic cash system". But today, it needs to rely on the second layer solutions in order to achieve that, therefore [some people argue](https://www.newsbtc.com/news/bitcoin/roger-ver-bitcoin-cash-is-a-better-investment-than-bitcoin/) that Bitcoin Cash is closer to what Nakamoto described. > > ​ > > **IT’S ONE OF THE MOST ACCEPTED CRYPTOCURRENCIES** > > As of 21.10.2021, [1168 merchants accept Bitcoin Cash](https://acceptbitcoin.cash/). And despite the fact that Bitcoin has risen in value since the hard fork while Bitcoin Cash has dropped in value a little, it’s still one of the most popular coins and the project is continuously developed. > > ​ > > **SUMMARY** > > Although Bitcoin Cash supporters claim that it can do whatever Bitcoin does but better and although it is one of the most popular cryptocurrencies that is constantly updated, it's impossible to deny the fact that it has lost against Bitcoin when it comes to adoption. And, unfortunately for BCH, it's all about adoption. ***** Would you like to learn more? Check out the [Cointest archive](/r/CointestOfficial/wiki/cointest_archive#wiki_Bitcoin_Cash) to find submissions for other topics.
No. I AM ~~SPARTACUS~~ SATOSHI.
The DOJ confirmed they met with the “SATOSHI’S” (pretty sure it was DOJ). It’s David Schwartz, Hal Finney, Clif High and Arthur Britto. Schwartz is NSA, Britto is the most famous and prolific man no one has ever seen and the others speak for themselves.
Enjoy the theories!: [Who is Satoshi Nakamoto? You WON'T Believe This!!](https://youtu.be/udUydSKMcUM?si=upUmkPDbjRUU4ZSf) [Strongest SATOSHI Candidates Yet?? ](https://youtu.be/cuItlQZ3RQg?si=CJDuSp4Cn-3vixT5) [CRAZY Bitcoin Theory!! Did Satoshi Work For The NSA?](https://youtu.be/Vr8PQsFOKwM?si=G_uKNW6F7RgoJzrK)
Michael Saylor has got an obsession with BTC...excluding SATOSHI he has the biggest bag of BTC..he personally owns over 17500 and his MICROSTRATEGY Co.nearly 159k BTC
Jack Dorsey was hanging out w JayZ wearing a SATOSHI sweatshirt.
Jack dorsey was at the superbowl rocking a Nirvana parody t shirt that said "SATOSHI" in the V.i.p state farm suite .
THANK YOU. I'M VERY UPSET. ***\*5 minutes later\**** "HELLO MR. SATOSHI, LISTEN I'M VERY UPSET I WOULD LIKE 5 OF YOUR FINEST BITCORNS NOW, I WANT THEM DELIVERED TO MY ADDRESS AND DO NOT KNOCK. RING THE DOOR BELL OR ELSE MY DOG WILL BARK".
JPM a few days ago: BITCOIN BAD! SATOSHI GONNA KILL THE BITCOINS! JPM now: BITCOIN GOOD! NO MOAR SELL BITCOIN! ONLY NUMBER GO BIG! They really think (or know) we're stupid.