XT

robyer

QANX is currently just ERC20 token living on Ethereum network, which makes it not quantum resistant. They keep promising mainnet launch since 2020, postponing it year after year. Cellframe is better, but the CELL you are buying/selling on exchanges is again just ERC20 token on Ethereum. They have one-way bridge from this ERC20 token to their native blockchain, but since it's one-way, you won't be able to sell that native coin anymore! QRL is fully working open source quantum-resistant blockchain project since 2018. Available on MEXC, LBank and XT exchanges as the real QR coin.

robyer

QANX is currently just ERC20 token living on Ethereum network, which makes it not quantum resistant. They keep promising mainnet launch since 2020, postponing it year after year. Proof: [https://postimg.cc/mP9pVntY](https://postimg.cc/mP9pVntY) Cellframe is better, but the CELL you are buying/selling on exchanges is again just ERC20 token on Ethereum. They have one-way bridge from this ERC20 token to their native blockchain, but since it's one-way, you won't be able to sell that native coin anymore! Proof: [https://postimg.cc/8JZZjQ0S](https://postimg.cc/8JZZjQ0S) (on their website) QRL is fully working open source quantum-resistant blockchain project since 2018. Available on MEXC, LBank and XT exchanges as the real QR coin.

robyer

QANX is currently just ERC20 token living on Ethereum network, which makes it not quantum resistant. They keep promising mainnet launch since 2019, postponing it year after year. Cellframe is better, but the CELL you are buying/selling on exchanges is again just ERC20 token on Ethereum. Then have one-way bridge from this ERC20 token to their native blockchain, but since it's one-way, you won't be able to sell that native coin anymore! QRL is fully working open source quantum-resistant blockchain project since 2018. Available on MEXC, LBank and XT exchanges as the real QR coin.

RandomNordicGuy

Not really, it just adapted. The peer-to-peer cash version split as early as the Bitcoin XT arguments and then it became BCH. The reason Bitcoin adopted to become more of an investment product has to do, I believe mostly with legislation. Once it became taxed as a property in the United States there was the realization that continuing to push and try to use it as peer-to-peer cash would be a failing business model. A few people tried to use it as cash and did. Especially in the early days. Then there was the debate on how the chain would continue to operate in the future. Where would revenue come from? Btc can operate self-sufficient just on miner revenue now. Rather than failing I see it more as a outstanding success. It was able to adapt to the changing environment. I think there is definitely still a place for peer-to-peer cash but if we look at Litecoin and Bitcoin cash, they don't have anywhere near the investor interest or support of BTC. The peer to peer cash argument is more of a niche thing. It's still desirable, both of those coins often run during bull phases but they aren't continuing to gain investor adoption, at least not anywhere near as much as BTC

Patient_Local_7861

Hi Guys, This is Abhinav here with XT, Regional BD Manager. Please feel free to reach out to discuss on listing your token or project on XT. I am recruiting listing partners, reach out at [abhinav@xt.com](mailto:abhinav@xt.com) Thanks Abhinav TG - abbylester

Patient_Local_7861

Hi Guys, This is Abhinav here with XT, Regional BD Manager. Please feel free to reach out to discuss on listing your token or project on XT. I am recruiting listing partners, reach out at [abhinav@xt.com](mailto:abhinav@xt.com) Thanks Abhinav TG - abbylester

Issa_John

Got a Ryzen 5 5600x and a 6750XT, l'll add my lil bit of compute power to the burning.

parkranger2000

Yeah i first heard it from Saylor which I thought was an interesting take https://youtube.com/shorts/UZo9GsBb5Go?si=WP-XT0enpVWO1XOJ

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; XT.COM, the world's first socially infused trading platform, announced the listing of DUEL(GameGPT) in its Innovation zone with a DUEL/USDT trading pair available from February 1, 2024. DUEL, an ERC-20 token on the Ethereum blockchain, enables participation in community airdrops, in-game utilities, marketplace use, and staking programs. The listing on XT.COM aims to broaden DUEL's market presence and aligns with GameGPT's commitment to creating a decentralized gaming environment, offering enhanced liquidity and a multifaceted utility for gamers and crypto enthusiasts. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.

Mottbox1534

It is though…..and yes I mined from 2018-2022. Mined with my 6800XT from 2020 to 2022. It literally is profitable and my math was and is correct.

filenotfounderror

....no 6800XT mines at 59 MH/s // 300 watts max power // at .09 KwH (CAS) thats a profit of.... -0.0270 Cents per day. also GPU mining hasnt been profitable for almost 4 years, regardless of what card you have.

Mottbox1534

My single 6800XT gaming GPU is profitable at 0.09 cents per kWh, profiting $0.26 per 24 hours at todays BTC value.

TDawgF

What you are describing is a hard fork. Something like this happened back around 2015 known as the fork wars with bitcoin XT. Bitcoin did fork back then and there where many many nodes for each type. As I recall it basically came down to the people that use and buy BTC. If the hard fork is ignored by the majority of people and everyone continues using clients blocks and transaction on the original network then the fork is basically dead. This is why you can't just spool up 100k nodes and take over BTC. It requires consensus. People have to choose to also use the new fork of BTC. The fact that is just exists isn't enough. Tick tock next block. Honey badger don't care.

manofsteelonwheels

https://preview.redd.it/8zolsc35lbkc1.png?width=1961&format=png&auto=webp&s=49b4b322cf00a44a46c293f94f3c1f273bac0bca A token that despite being de-listed from CEXs, is still being diamond handed by them. Once it picks up steam, getting back into Bitrue, OKX and XT com should be easier. Shame Hotbit is not around anymore

TissueUnflawed

This again In 2015, someone panicked that Bitcoin was soon to run out of block space. In 2016, another, and another. There were three extra variants of Bitcoin - XT, Classic and Unlmited But there was no urgency. Blocks did not fill Nine years later, the same panic, and still the truth is that it's not going to happen soon, maybe in 50-80 years

Frogolocalypse

XT (aka fail-train #1) Classic (aka fail-train #2) BU (aka fail-train #3) BCH (aka fail-train #4) 2x (aka fail-train #5) BSV (aka fail-train #6) They kinda gave up after that.

Frogolocalypse

I made a helpful [list.](https://old.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/6qy592/478559_found/dl19x92/) XT (aka fail-train #1) Classic (aka fail-train #2) BU (aka fail-train #3) BCH (aka fail-train #4) 2x (aka fail-train #5)

TheEpiczzz

Anyone on here done some Crypto mining through Salad? Just had an advertisement come by and it sparked a little interest, yet so many questions. I've seen crypto mining on your own PC come by for years, yet it keeps sounding fishy. I always wonder if it really does make such a difference and make you money. Your PC will slowly deteriorate. Faster than it does while just gaming for a few hours a week. Electricity bill will go up, so more monthly costs etc. Does it really weigh up against those costs? I mean I barely have time to use my PC at home and it has a AMD Ryzen 5, 3600X - 16GB RAM - AMD 4750XT. So quite good specs, just not as high end as some. Anyone did any crypto mining who can give me some insights in wether it's worth it or not?

Cptn_BenjaminWillard

There are better rates available. Also, the exchanges need to make money. They are spending incredible amounts on computer infrastructure, bandwidth, and professional security defence teams to keep your money safe. If you have significant money parked on an exchange, you don't want a bunch of script kiddies gathered around a bank of ICM PC XT's in the basement storage room running security for the domain.

Maxx3141

That's unique for each situation. My 400€ GPU (RX 5700 XT) made me 100€ a month in all of 2021 after electricity costs. My Ryzen 5900X makes about 1-2$ per day mining ZEPH, while the electricity cost is about 1$ per day. So it's a mix between some gains and break even. But it's winter, so after taking heating costs into account it's still an ok profit. That PC has paid for itself several times just because I mine when idle. That will be a lot harder today though. It was also used for video editing and gaming, which was the main reason I build it.

SeemedGood

While I was early on the train of running an XT node, and supported the development of some early fork efforts by donating equipment to devs, I am not a BCH maximalist. I’ve never purchased any BCH because I believe that there are better alts than BCH. But I was there to witness the co-opting and corruption of Bitcoin and I watched and participated in the public debate with with those doing it enough to surmise that they were *absolutely* acting in bad faith. But the beauty of cryptocurrency is that it’s voluntary and they can’t force anyone to use it. All they can really do is continue to deceive, and eventually that’s a losing strategy. So, not really worried about it, but I will tell the truth to all those not present when it went down, or not curious enough to question what they have been told at fundamental levels, or not well studied enough to understand how they are being deceived.

Sheeple9001

XT.com is pretty bad as well.

ettoneba

I will keep tabs to pounce on the opportunity of buying early. Personally, I use XT.COM and MEXC to buy KREST. You can check it out.

dysthopian

Bro, the benefit of a blockchain is the lack of a need to speculate. Most market liquidity comes from miners; long term wallets probabilistically are very unlikely to sell given their historic holding patterns. https://youtu.be/BhJjhK4UoEk?si=KDvgLw_XT5bAsnr9

ettoneba

I use XT.COM and MEXC exchanges for trading Krest. They're options you might find useful too.

CandidateNrOne

Why is moon on 23 ct on XT.com exchange and at 6 at Kraken?

eventualexpat

I mean this is probably a big part of the reason that Bitcoin went the direction that it did. Before 2016, you had the Bitcoin XT movement, the people like Roger really pushing for use as currency. That minority lost and they have their own fork but it's funny how that all turned out. The BCH fork is used as cash with ultra low fees in countries that don't have these tax problems. BTC on the other hand is an investment vehicle with way more money and way more hash power and way more people in it. However it is an investment vehicle that does have a pretty good use case for hiding money from governments which is pretty cool. If you're in China, you can upload millions to BTC, leave the country and then retrieve it if you're a little crafty. So I don't think the currency use of BTC is gone, it's just the small transaction, and use phone to phone type currency is definitely not there. Tax policy is almost certainly a big reason why things went this direction

hok98

Are we pretending like XT and other shady and blatant protocol censorship wasn’t a thing?

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; According to data from web analytics platform Similarweb, major cryptocurrency websites like Binance and Coinbase have seen a significant drop in traffic in 2023. However, other crypto websites such as OKX, HTX, Gate.io, CoinW, XT.com, Bitmart, Kraken, MetaMask, Trust Wallet, Uniswap, and Bitrefill have experienced an increase in traffic. This suggests that the crypto market may not be in a bear market after all. While website traffic doesn't reflect trading volumes, it can indicate adoption and demand for crypto services. Additionally, Bitcoin is only down 12% from its recent high, according to CoinGecko data. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.

_TheWolfOfWalmart_

Are there any Bitcoin wallets for MS-DOS? I have an old IBM XT with an ethernet card and I think it would be the most secure possible hot wallet because it's fucking MS-DOS and has no network-related security holes lol

Malik_-

Everything is out there to DYOR, MC is still under 10m. If you still miss out on Crux Decussata then It can't even be called bad luck. Remember, XT listed this in the Main zone where only 22 major coins are listed. Furthermore, it's tagged as "DeFi". Hints given here are more than real alpha you get in regular new coins. Take it & Run.

Doogy_style6

Dude there's definitely something strange with it. I've been digging a lot on it too, though a couple of my theories are only sitting at like 70% confidence, so I don't want to share them yet (but have been logging them to see how accurate, or crazy I am haha) Also on the CMC thing, I noticed it listed as "defi" - so who knows what it's gonna be at this point. Also a note on the XT exchange and X (formerly Twitter) logo - The thick part of the X is reversed, but same design. And XT has had that logo for years (look on the wayback machine) XT says it's a social trading platform. Also found speculation elsewhere that Elon may be interested in buying it. They also are listing this token in the main area. Nearly every token listed there goes to innovation zone, not main. It's just a lot, lol Digging into Herbert - wow. This man has done so much and seems like he's VERY well connected. Crypto chain university? They literally have a host of blockchain parents associated with their members. This man was marketing for Bitcoin when it was single dollar amounts. He must be well tied into the OG BTC and cypherpunk community. The mystery drew me in, and the facts have kept my attention. Please, if you find anything else that is like "wow, holy shit" post it. I feel like as soon as we know the actual plan, this will make a whirlwind in the entire cryptosphere. The people behind this don't need money, and it feels like they're building something to help all of us plebs out of the grasp of tyrannical governments. Time will tell.

Odlavso

The first hard fork was bitcoin XT back in 2014. https://www.investopedia.com/tech/history-bitcoin-hard-forks/

soundingdemo

Bitcoin XT was a fork of the code, it actually never activated.

eat-sleep-rave

Moons are now listed on those CEXs: Kraken, [Crypto.com](https://Crypto.com), [Gate.io](https://Gate.io), MEXC, Bitget, XT.com

Ithinkstrangely

Mike Hearn forked Bitcoin in 2014 to a coin called Bitcoin XT. The development sabotaged it from getting proposals through and it 'died out'. Mike saw that Bitcoin needed to scale on-chain and was the first to do it (after Satoshi). [https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Bitcoin\_XT](https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Bitcoin_XT) XT proponents flipped to Bitcoin Cash.

Zorbithia

It varies pretty widely depending on what kind of hardware you are using/how much hardware power you are devoting to it. I'm not sure if they've changed the reward amounts or not since I last did it, but I used to be able to get a couple hundred BAN per day (I think I was getting around 300) running folding on an RX 5700 XT at the time

Littlefinger_13

First, don't answer any DMs. They are all scammers. Never share passwords, seed phrases, or any personal information with anyone. Huobi, is a relatively big Exchange, but it has the (little shady) Justin Sun, as one of its major stakeholders. I believe that you can deposit and withdraw \~50k USD every 24H, without KYC. So, you don't have to give them personal information and credential, if you don't want. Maybe XT. com has a similar limit. Now, if you want to use these Exchanges and, at the end of the road, have FIAT money in your Bank account, this is a possible route: Firstly, open an account with some of these Exchanges. Preferably use a newly-created email to sign-up, and of course use a unique, and not re-usable, password. Then, deposit your PI tokens to the Exchange that you chose. Do a test transaction first, to be sure that everything works right. Then, go to the "spot market", and sell your PI tokens for USDT (it's a stablecoin, meaning that its value is equal to 1$). Then open an account (with KYC) with a more reputable Exchange (Coinbase, Kraken if you are in the US, plus Binance if you are not) and deposit your USDT to one of these reputable Exchanges. Be careful when you transfer your USDT. You must be sure that you use the same depositing and withdrawing network. Make a test transaction again to be sure. Now, that you have your USDT to one of these reputable Exchanges, convert your USDT to your native FIAT currency (USD, EUR, etc.), and use one of the methods that they suggest, to withdraw your FIAT to your bank account. These methods might differ, depending on your country of origin. P.S. Pi token might not have big liquidity in the PI/USDT pair, because it is a small (in market cap) coin. You also said that you have a big amount of PI. So, be careful, when you sell. You can tank the price by your selling, and eventually take 10-20% less USDT from what you thought you were. Maybe if you sell in smaller "pieces", or placing limit orders, might help. P.S. 2 Everything of the above is NOT Financial Advice. If you'll use any of the above Exchanges, or follow any the above steps, you are doing it at your own risk. Good Luck!

Flynn_Kevin

You can, and it isn't except for the experience of doing it. Mining XMR is almost always unprofitable at today's price once you consider power cost. You're not getting rich doing it. RPI- 100 H/s @ 5W (0.0004 XMR/month) R5 (3600/3600X/3600XT/5600/5600X/5600X3D)- 6-8 kH/s @ 80-125W (0.025-0.032 XMR/month) R9 (3950X/5950X)- 16-20 kH/s @ 150-250W (0.065-0.082 XMR/month) My farm: Power costs: $147/month Revenue: $160/month Profit: $13/month CPUs on p2Pool mining XMR and supporting the network: 100-120 kH/s (0.42-0.49 XMR/month) GPUs profit switching other coins on Monero Ocean pool with payout in XMR (does not support the network): 100-120 kH/s (0.42-0.49 XMR/month). June/July2023 was especially profitable with some alts pumping 2x against XMR. My GPU farm averaged 180 kH/s (.73 XMR/month)

Medfried

XT dot com, some shady exchange from Dubai listed $MOON. And they are using Black Bitcoin logo as avatar for the MOON/USDT pair..

shangavibesXBL

Yep! Currently use brave and was top 90 for Banano Miner for a bit. Think i stopped with around 42 million points folded total and around 20k BAN before I sold it to pay for my 5600XT during the 2c peak.

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; Tether has announced the expansion of Euro Tether (EUR₮) and Tether Gold (XAU₮) on the social-infused exchange XT.COM. This move will allow users to access XAU₮, which represents ownership of physical gold, and transact with EUR₮, a stablecoin pegged to the euro. Tether's CTO emphasized their commitment to unlocking financial liberation and fostering economic inclusivity. XAU₮ and EUR₮ currently have market caps of $474 million and $44 million, respectively. Tether has also signed a Memorandum of Understanding with Georgia's government to position the country as a global hub. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.*

Qptimised

Basically the tldr is Tether's digital EUR and GOLD tokens have been listed on an exchange (XT) that is based in Dubai. I've never heard of this exchange but going through their website, they seem to be operating in a lot of countries.

shangavibesXBL

Folding at home paid off my 5600XT in just 4 months when BAN peaked at 0.02c. I honestly haven’t touched the discord or FAH since unfortunately. Last time I was active in the discord was when someone who made a pretty rad website for FAH ended up scamming the community out of a few thousand.

BIGDADDYCRYPTO6900

BTC is king but there are forks like Bitcoin Cash, Bitcoin Gold, Bitcoin XT, Bitcoin Classic… all of those are worthless copy cat The only fork worth a damn is BTD - Bitcoin Daddy. Coming soon. Bitcoin may be king but even kings has Daddy’s.

MichaelAischmann

XT .com Whenever you are looking for where specific coins are traded and which trading pairs are offered, every coin/token has a tab called "markets" on coingecko. https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/worldcoin#markets

only_merit

I'm referring to incidents like during blocksize war, where people were introducing forks like Bitcoin XT, Bitcoin Unlimited, etc.

shangavibesXBL

Bought ETH and folded for Banano. Ended up paying off my 5600XT in a few months when it spiked!

igadjeed

> Bip 50 March 2013 It's not 2013 any more > suggests that significant number of nodes are actually owned by Bitcoin Miners who can basically change the rules when they want? There's no such suggestion in the document > node providers Did you mean node operators? There's a statistics page somewhere which shows a small number of holdouts still running Classic, Unlimited or XT > What will happen when miners and node operators follow different chains? Bitcoin operates as * each node is independent, each user should only trust his own node * a supermajority of all currently participating nodes, where every node has the same transaction history as a consequence of each node operator choosing to follow the same consensus rules The Bitcoin node network converges on the same transaction history in spite of each node being independent ###What makes the transaction history into a chain? Each block header contains the hash of the previous block header ###I want to buy something. What if my node follows a different chain to my merchant's node? He can not accept my payment. I choose a different merchant. He loses a customer --- BCash happened. Some miners switched. Some nodes switched (very few node operators as it happened). Most exchanges chose to support Bitcoin and BCash. Some merchants chose to support Bitcoin and BCash. Very few merchants support only BCash

Giga79

https://www.technologyreview.com/2014/08/15/12784/the-man-who-really-built-bitcoin/ >A few days later, he sent one last message to the newly-assigned Bitcoin Core Maintainer Gavin Andresen. Gavin Andersen later believed *Craig Wright* was Satoshi. He also worked on increasing Bitcoin's block size, eventually forking Bitcoin into Bitcoin XT.. He's been at the center of so much drama, and at the center of the Bitcoin Foundation. A really interesting figure.

Raja528

Yo, sounds like there's a new doge in town! While AIDOGE might not fit the typical "meme" mold, its deflationary concept and earning potential are worth considering. And the fact that top exchanges like MEXC, gate, XT and Bitget are offering rewards for depositors and traders is definitely something to keep in mind if you're thinking about exploring the event.

WhyAmIGreer

Their coin. Own coin, own blockchain, you can take it and sell it for USDT or LTC on Tradeogre, XT, TXbit…

Tasigur1

In first place BTC is the king and has by far the greatest network effect. Another argument is, look at all BTC forks: Bitcoin XT, Bitcoin Classic, Bitcoin Unlimited, Bitcoin Cash, Bitcoin Gold, Bitcoin SV etc. They all bleed and lost value against the OG! Litecoin is also bleeding against BTC => January 2014, LTC was at 24$ and BTC was at 885$. TL;DR Buy the OG if u like gains!

Random_Person_246810

If you can get USDT on Coinbase, you can use a no-KYC exchange like XT (but would move it to an offline wallet after).

spamohh

>The Fight Out team has announced that the FGHT token will be listed on seven exchanges – XT.com, LBank, BKEX, Changelly Pro, BitForex, DigiFinex, and Uniswap. God damn out of those seven exchanges I've only ever heard of Uniswap, but anyone can list their tokens there, sounds sketchy af

lelgimps

good thing I invested in ANYTHING during 2020-2022 and can now buy 5 GPUs if I wanted. And I ended up buying a 6950 XT a few days ago instead of bitching about not being able to play minecraft at max settings.

rare_design

Thank you for the reply. I did find it yesterday and forgot to post an update. It comes up as WDC on XT, and you can buy it now. Not sure why they don't allow searching for descriptive names.

rare_design

Where else can you get WorldCoin? Oddly even on their site they show XT as the exchange, but it isn’t coming up.

ComparisonJunior7325

Stay away from XT. Crap exchange

ElderBlade

Yep. I'm reading about it right now. I never heard of Bitcoin XT, Bitcoin Classic, and Bitcoin Unlimited before. There's a reason they never saw the light of day or didn't last very long.

lexwolfe

Huobi, XT and bitmart all listed "Pi" without having any. Deposits and withdraws are unavailable.

skyvina

Really? Its gone down for sure. My 6900 XT is down $350

Maxx3141

The GPU (5700XT) I used very long to mine ETH would still be in heavy losses when mining any GPU mineable coin right now. It could only generate profits below 0.05$/kWh. For single-GPU-miners it should still be more profitable to [fold](https://bananominer.com) for Banano.

rantlers357

Bullish on this Proof-of-Authority project, main net is live, capable of processing 500-1000 TPS, NXTwallet is live on Google Play Store, team is doxxed, already listed on XT exchange, hosting AMAs almost daily, utility built in, and tons more on the way.

rantlers357

Excited to see where NXTchain goes, team is committed and has been delivering milestones at a rapid pace. Just got a smol bag on XT. Tested out the wallet app and wallet's swap on BNB since it supports Eth, BNB & NXTchain, it was pretty slick, easy to use.

Sheeple9001

Good, now go after other exchanges like XT.com that send out spam without unsubscription links.

PracticalStranger97

Didn't even hear about XT.com

Slainte042

XT first seemed like some FTX cloning.

prthu001

I have never heard of this XT exchange before tbh

icanseeeu

Not yet, unfortunately. XT.com, pancakeswap, plus some other DEXes like everswap etc. (check website for full list) More CEXes will come in future. After the market turns bullish I guess.

thedarkpampers

I might be suspicious but i still dmor none the less. I need to heat my room and i see that it's gpu minable. It cost me next to nothing to dust off my 5700XT and mine some.

and_another_username

Yea. That’s why I’m specifically talkin in terms of on ramping fiat. CB and trading aren’t worthy of being in the same sentence lol. Sounds crazy but being in US and not being a total tech nerd sucks in crypto trading . BinanceUS? Sucks. CB? Sucks. FTX.US? Sucks. And barely leverage options here. I Never fcked with RH or Gemini. Does Gemini link to bank? I actually loved Cointiger before US blocked it. Then I switched to XT. It’s all about that mobile UI for me. I used to work for a few different shitcoins a few yrs back. Only 2 u might have heard it was Hex (before hexx) and WeAreSatoshi. And another Native Indian gaming association official coin. No lottery tickets. But Got familiar with a ton of lesser known exchanges. Tradesatoshi, p2pb2b, Poloniex, Mercatox, bitfinex, yobit, STEX, beaxy (lol), And saw alot of what’s goin on from the inside. Shits still the Wild West out there. The Market makers and wash trading is incredible. U can literally pay for certain chart patterns. And if it’s your main vol exchange the others will follow. 90% of the market is fake volume. I was some nobody bagholder with no technical knowledge ended up in the business. Literally negotiating listing prices with exchanges myself. While working on a construction site on a damn scaffold and I’m haggling a STEX listing price. It was fun. Felt like a bigshot for a min. Showing of diff big names we dealt with. Macafee. Ver. Gothstein. Pedo brock pierce. All the Twitter influencers. Found out who’s a dick and who’s cool. I stepped away to save my damn marriage. Took up way too much time with little payoff and tons of backstabbing. I’m high btw. Sorry for the rant I had an issue once depositing eth. Thought I got fcked. Made a ticket. Funds deposited in 2 days.

igadjeed

> Satoshi said to increase it as time went on It was increased in 2017. Blocks are rarely full You've been gaslighted into believing Bitcoin has a scaling problem. This panic was false in 2015 (Bitcoin XT), false in 2017 (BCash, SegWit2X fail), and is still false today. Try thinking for yourself instead of copying trash talk from the block wars throwbacks ETH, on the other hand, is impossible to build a fully validating node because the node software crashes part-way through. There are fewer and fewer fully validating nodes every month

GabeSter


Sheeple9001

XT.com is one of the worst exchanges and mobile app I've used. Their promotional emails (with changing `From` addresses make it hard to filter) make it even worse compared to other exchanges (at least you can unsubscribe from marketing emails), what can a regular joe do about these unsolicited emails?

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; The prices of AMD GPUs are dropping rapidly. The Radeon RX 6900 XT is now at the lowest price it's ever been. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.*

Lavasioux

900 DOLLARYDOOS! https://youtu.be/-w3iPFl-cfI https://stellar.expert/explorer/public/asset/DOLLARYDOOS-GCUDSH5SNAQ5L6VC23O3W34P6GM6OV7XT5BAZ75ZRQAMXHGHB3MLGEEK-2

slibetah

We need to distinguish between a soft fork vs a hard fork. Bitcoin (BTC) as I understand, has had soft forks. Same chain, backwards compatible. Bitcoin XT, Bitcoin Classic, BitcoinCash and many others are hard forks. ETH has had hard forks starting with The DAO hack, and did so in a rather centralized fashion, and especially centralized now that it is POS.

wolfbetter

Are gpu used for mining good for gaming? I wouldn't mini buying a 3070 ti or a 6800 XT below MSRP

FunkyRider

Bought 6800XT two years ago before this mining craze taking off. I plan to use it for at least 6 years before even considering to upgrade. Even the 7950 in my back up PC still runs some games just fine.

uncountableinfinity

Love my Radeon 9800XT. It came with Half Life 2 for free!

RockEmSockEmRabi

Snagged a 6600XT this year just to hold me over until we see this waterfall of cards hitting the market. Really hope prices continue to drop in retail and resale so that Nvidia and AMD can’t keep gouging MSRP for new cards

youssif94

>You can get an RTX 3080 10GB OC on amazon for $729.99 hell, even the 6900XT is 729.99$ on Amazon right now! absolutely crazy!

Killersteve420

This is definitely on my Radar. Going to pick some up after it's available on XT this week. Considering dedicating a couple of GPU rigs to it as well.

Kristkind

I don't have much time currently, so I will reply briefly to the main points, possibly elaborating them later. > It's irrelevant here, though; the issue at hand is that he took part in a money laundering operation. Conspiracy - planning on committing a crime - is a punishable offense. As is setting up and implementing a tool for money laundering, *and profiting from said tool.* The coder didn't directly profit from the smart contract as the prominent article from coincenter has shown. But we don't know yet what the investigation will bring to light. The Dutch FDIO-website makes it sound like the programmer actively mixed the coins, which is not true. Again I refer to the coincenter article. > It's not impossible at all. It's pretty trivial. That's not what I meant. Ethereum wouldn't work as a censored chain. So yeah, that's Ethereum's problem. > The reality is that there's no meaningful defense against this because the network has to interact with reality, otherwise it is useless, and the US can pretty much cut that off, at least in places that actually matter in real life. So does the state. The question is will they a) demand that regulated entities don't directly interact with censored addresses --> not a big problem or will they b) clamp down on the larger network --> possible, but there would certainly be a legal fight with unclear outcome. Quoting from this article: https://mirror.xyz/born.eth/KmX_2BJLT7ICYLi1XT90HheG4QG41ULd4FfybH5wdF0 > In 2014, Apple and Google began encrypting mobile storage such that they no longer had backdoor access. This broke the status quo and upset government agencies, however so far this technical architecture has held up in court. Today, Ethereum validating clients will both build (compile) and produce (sign) a block, implying they’d have the ability* to check each transaction prior to signing it. We can provide block producers with the ability to sign blocks without knowing the contents that they contain by separating the block builder from the block proposer (aka Proposer Builder Separation - PBS). With PBS, the block proposer would simply sign the block header and only discover the block contents later. This does move the censorship problem to the block builders; however these entities can more easily operate outside OFAC controlled nations.

TruthSeeekeer

> According to a press release, these unregistered VASPs are KuCoin, MEXC, Phemex, XT.com, Bitrue, ZB.com, Bitglobal, CoinW, CoinEX, AAX, ZoomEX, Poloniex, BTCEX, BTCC, DigiFinex, and Pionex. It’s a shame that they are limiting competition

arcalus

I have a 6900XT. Can confirm AMD is superior. Especially when it comes to Linux support.

arcalus

If anyone has a source(s) for 6900XT reference cards, let me know.

SuckinAwesome

Just a reminder that Brian Armstrong tried to support Bitcoin forks like BTC XT, BTC Unlimited and BCash. To take the power from plebs and have institutions in control. Also, sold internal chain data to the US secret service for $168k. Fuck him and Coinbase. Might as well be a legacy banker.

Next_Foundation_3892

Core i12400k+6700XT/3080ti combo

inductivespam

Grab you a half dozen 5700 XT‘s and get with it - Some cheap on eBay

EastAdvice4309

I made some profit on XT change, and when I want to withdraw, these guys locked me out for risky control. They locked me out since June 14,2022, and they claimed that I have multiple accounts which I don’t! And they reply my ticket every 10 days. I have about $10K locked in there. What should I do?

thinkingperson

I'm with you on this. My first contact with PC was an XT, and later an Apple IIe or IIc. The first virus I encountered was Denzuko, MBR hack, TSR and all the whistles. But yeah, most of the time, I find anti virus and anti malware, the very problem it is trying to fix. I also only run a limited set of known official apps and hit the spam button for any email I am not expecting. Gmail removes most, but some come through. I also think people really forget to read the fine-prints before clicking confirm.

YeOldDoc

As somebody who was actually there when this went down, let me remark a couple of things that are often overlooked in these kind of retroactive glorifications of UASF, which - let me remind you - aimed to justify a contentious split by merely claiming to represent an intangible "econ. majority": TLDR: 1. Blocksize increase had broad consensus in 2015 2. HKA agreement between Core and miners in 2016 to implement 2MB hard-fork failed 3. SegWit2X has significant economic majority but was poorly coded and luckily called off 4. UASF never had majority support in any group with the exception of Core developers 5. SegWit activated with the help of SegWit2X votes [BIP91, Source](https://twitter.com/yeolddoc/status/1398235431867650048) If you read a piece on UASF and it fails to mention HKA and it's minority support status, be careful. Details: # 2015: Blocksize increase was consensus In the years leading up to NYA/UASF there was general consensus that blocksize needed to be increased. The question was not if, but by how much. - *"8MB by 2019"* (Adam Back) - *17%/year* ("Peter Wuille") - *Dynamic blocksize* ("Bitcoin Core Roadmap") # 2016: Hong Kong Agreement promises SegWit + 2MB. Several prominent Core contributors signed an agreement to develop a hard-fork of the non-witness data to 2MB and recommend this implementation to Bitcoin Core by July 2016. The community was relieved: Finally a Core led initiative to raise the blocksize and end the war. But the code to upgrade to 2MB never materialized, Luke Dashjr proposed a reduction to 300kb instead. Without a failed HKA, NYA or UASF would never have happened. #2017: UASF vs NYA With the exception of support by Core developers, there wasn't any majority support of UASF in any group: - 0% of hashrate supported UASF - ~5% of economic actors supported UASF - ~13% of full nodes supported UASF (which consisted mainly of new nodes, Bitcoin Classic hat 34% and Bitcoin ABC 27% at some point) - ~87% of full nudes yielded decision about SegWit to 95% of miners (BIP9) - ~90% of Core devs favoured a UASF (BIP148 or BIP149, [Source](https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Segwit_support) Node count is inherently flawed as a measure to gauge "user" support: Bitcoin XT had similar node shares as UASF once. Bitcoin Classic has had larger shares than UASF once. Bitcoin ABC had once a share twice as high as UASF. Yet node count for UASF is often treated as "the will of the users" while the others are treated as sybil attack. It should also be noted that UASF was originally not aimed at users, but at economic actors (businesses accepting Bitcoin, exchanges, wallets, ...). From the UASF FAQ: > if the **economic majority** agree to run code that rejects non-signalling segwit blocks.[...] If a large part of the **economic majority** publicly say that they will adopt this new client, miners will have to signal bip9 segwit activation in order for their blocks to be valid. Especially noteworthy is that the UASF FAQ explicitly warned > **that users do not update [to UASF] unless an economic majority commits.** [...] **BIP148 requires support from the economic majority, particularly exchanges and wallets.** But UASF **failed** to secure significant support from businesses which started signing the NYA instead, which claimed to represent the economic majority that UASF aimed for: - 58 companies, including 14 exchanges - 5 billion USD of monthly transaction - 80% of hashing power - 20 million bitcoin wallets At this point UASF had no hashrate (0%), only minuscule support from economic actors (5%) and very few nodes (2%). Then the UASF propaganda was kicked into overdrive: - **Companies are now bad** for Bitcoin because they collude in **"backroom deals"** and prepare **"corporate overtake"** of Bitcoin (note that this happened in an atmosphere where miners and Core devs continued to fail to produce a viable solution) - UASF is now not only about activating Segwit but **taking a stance against evil companies** - The economic majority is now about **running "full nodes"** instead of companies/exchanges/wallets. - Sudden increase of UASF node counts and hats. So. many. hats. UASF node count continued to rise but never exceeded 13%. Many suspected those nodes to be either fake or run in the cloud. People cite "almost 15%" as a clear sign of a significant "grassroot movement". In comparison, Bitcoin Classic and ABC had 34% and 27% at their highest peak. (Note that all of them had significant amounts of instances run on cloud VMs). The only metric in which UASF gained any significant support from any group at all at any point in time was support by Core developers: ~50% were in favour of BIP 148, 90% in favour of any UASF (BIP148 or BIP149) while all of them were against S2X. In the end, UASF's goal was achieved (i.e. SegWit activation without blocksize increase) despite its activation (BIP148) having no effect (BIP91 locked in SegWit before). This led people to become UASF supporters "in hindsight": Wearing a UASF hat then meant: "I support threatening a minority chain split in order to force activation of SegWit." Wearing a UASF hat now means: "I support Core. Also: Users should have more say than 'companies' in the strategic development of Bitcoin". It is difficult to assess the UASF support in numbers at that time, especially with regard to the number of people supporting UASF without running a corresponding node. **But it is important to note that UASF did not have any significant support on any known metric and no majority in any metric (except for Core devs) at any time during the "blocksize war".** **** This creates a difficult situation for UASF supporters which claim that UASF is the one and only cause for Segwit activation: Either - a minority of users with - a minority of nodes and - a minority of economic actors and - a minority of hashrate or - a majority of Core developers is sufficient to significantly alter Bitcoin's future against the wishes of the community. The easiest escape from this dilemma is doing what the linked article does: Claiming that UASF had overwhelming user support, but the numbers simply don't support that. It's just a fairy tale to make users feel in control. I think we are all glad NYA was cancelled, but whether we should worship threats of chain splits in order to activate proposed changes to the Bitcoin protocol with no hashrate and only minority node support is questionable.

FrankieTheYoung

XT.com

Witty-Television1328

https://pay.atomicwallet.io/101400000_BTC_17ZKeH2FqwdktsJhEMwyWFDqmyFd9Gr2XT

Dugg

Make no, but he was massively influential. He funded XT et al way before fork. It’s like buying Russian war bonds and claiming you had nothing to do with conflict. At some point you have to own up to the fact you were an enabler and had a vested interest in its success.

tika_dengu

Binance #1 on BTC volume by exchange with around 10%. AAX is second at around 3.8%, followed by XT (3.35%), LBank (3.2%), Coinsbit (2.75%), Bullish (2.7%). Shady

n1ghsthade


Odysseus_Lannister