Reddit Posts
Kucoin is finally going to give me my money!
Anyone else looking into BCHA ? ( Bitcoin Cash ABC )
Mentions
Looks like BCHA price has glitched as well, but actually stayed this way.
Bitcoin Cash ABC (BCHA) rebranded to eCash (XEC) on July 1, 2021 1 $BCHA for 1,000,000 $XEC. This is why you have such a low daily volume! Best of luck
Let's say the change is contentious. All the public forums tell the proposer to take a long walk of a short pier. Nothing happens Propose a change which is not contentious, like Taproot. Spend a couple of years working on it, and testing public feedback. With minimal opposition, the miners and nodes adopt it Propose a change which is contentious, but the developer believes it's essential for the health of the network. This happened a couple of years ago on a well-known shitcoin. The developer proposed a 15% tax on mining rewards, to fund ongoing development, with 6 months warning. He did it. A new developer group forked the source code without the developer tax. BCH split into BCHA (with tax) and BCHN (no tax). Both chains still exist. BCHN is commonly known as BCH. BCHA is very small > the mechanics Nodes do not vote. There is a miner voting mechanism, but unfortunately, the mining pools do not delegate the actual vote to their members. But that's not important In a sense, there are no mechanics. After the change, you have one chain or two. If you have two, one might be so small that everybody ignores it. But who is "everybody". If nodes can't be counted for opinion, what decides which fork is successful? For these questions, Bitcoin is a social consensus which has no precise metrics ... Do you buy Bitcoin from Kraken? Does Kraken support one fork or the other or both? If both, does Kraken use "BTC" for one, and "BTCmaybenot" for the other? If you spend Bitcoin to buy from AirVPN (for example) or other merchants, do the merchants accept one fork or the other? Are there any exchanges suspending or refusing to list the "smaller" fork because it has insufficient liquidity. Is the global hash rate of the smaller fork so low that you need to wait 3 weeks of transaction confirmations to avoid 51% attack transaction replacements. This is the case with ETC, for example. Users have to wait thousands of confirmations after depositing ETC to a Coinbase account Even if the small (less popular) fork is tiny, it may persist for years
Could BCHA ever over take BCH by market cap? Has Anyone here looked more thoroughly into these two? What conclusions have you so far come too in this regards , so far?
Yeah the Bittrex thing happened to so many people recently that it seems to overshadow anything. There's quite a bit of heat on KuCoin because of this BCHA fiasco but I'd still rank them just as trustworthy/shitty as Binance and Coinbase (with Binance.US being far below all three of those). I think you're at just as much risk on any of those 3 exchanges. >'m looking forwards for proper DEX to come around. Which is why I'm so bullish on Loopring! Their new L2 wallet will effectively become an almost feeless Ethereum/ERC20 DEX. Well, you still have to pay gas fees once to get your funds into the system, but they're working on a direct fiat on- and off-ramp!
I am astonished by the fact, that they still have not realized (or admitted to) the fact, that they can reactivate the withdrawals of BCHA, even without the rebrand. After 6 months of not being able to (or rather not wanting to) make a merely cosmetic change that involves updating their software (2 clicks) and changing a comma (3clicks), they could simply keep the old BCHA brand and let people withdraw. The BCHA would have been "converted" automatically to XEC. I am flabbergasted by the fact, that CEO u/Johnny_Kucoin is still blaming the "rebrand" for it. Not only is it an effortless task, but even if they have troubles, this change is optional.
Other exchanges have already gone ahead with the rebrand and list it as XEC. 1 BCHA = 1M XEC
Still waiting on that BCHA, Coinbase are a bunch of thieves.
It sounds like OP invested in something before it was prudent to do so. He/she/it is now stuck in limbo. Why buy BCHA or whatever the hell this is? Why not just buy normal BCH that is liquid and able to withdraw. I'm not trying to victim shame or whatever (I don't even know if there is a victim because no crime has been committed). You always hear about the 1 bad case before the 1000 good cases that came before the bad. People don't praise a company when they get good service beyond expectations. We only hear about the bad things. I don't use Kucoin.
I rather think that BCHA have screwed up in providing proper documentation. That is also the reason why the fork failed. You can't just change important parameters on a gut feeling when you have no idea what impact it will have in the long run.
Not saying KuCoin is dangerous, I’m taking about that coin BCHA
Noob question. But Im on kucoin now and there are buy and sell orders for BCHA. What does OP mean with no liquidity?
I have a question: Like I understood: - You bought BCHA on the exchange. - And now you wish to sell, for USDT - But there is low liquidity for the pair BCHA/USDT. - Because of the low liquidity, he can not sell for USDT. I hope my understanding is correct. My question is: Is this not the risk of using an exchange? If nobody wishes to buy your coin, the low pair BCHA/USDT liquidity indicates this, what can you blame the exchange? For myself, the exchange that I use, asks 0.0005 BTC to transfer the bitcoins to a wallet or other exchange. With the current BTC prices, this is a crazy fee. (The same for my OMG. The ETH price is to high)
Why would kucoin prevent him from withdrawing the BCHA? They haven't actually got any maybe?
It's not Bitcoin Cash. It's called eCash, a fork of Bitcoin Cash. The original ticker was BCHA but now it's been rebranded to XEC.
TLDR: OP has 50k in dropped on a coin called BCHA. There isn’t enough liquidity for him to cash it out and it’s stuck on kucoin. Kucoin has ignored him since may. He wants ceo to see this and respond.
I have enough BCHA on there that I would have to sell it for pennies on the dollar.
Just trade the BCHA to USDT and withdraw?
Kucoin is Scam. He is the thief himself. He is a thief who stole the BCHA/XEC. Instead of depositing money in KUCOIN, it's the same if you give that money to a thief you see on the street. STAY AWAY FROM KUCOIN!
I bought BCHA around $200 after it dropped from $350. Just kept dropping. Bit the bullet today and took a 50% L. Last time I’m ever doing a swing trade without doing the fundamentals first.
when do you the BCHA rebranding?!!!! we have been waiting for so long!!!
When can we withdraw our BCHA/xec coin?????
Count how many months it has been. When you will let me withdraw my BCHA? Is Kucoin a scam exchange? I have doubts now
tldr; Bitcoin’s inventor Satoshi Nakamoto is now the 20th richest particular person on the planet. Nakamoto owns roughly $60.7 billion in bitcoin, $625 million in bitcoin cash, $169 million in bitcoinsv (BSV), and $191 million in ecash (previously often called BCHA or Bitcoin ABC). Nakamoto's wealth is above the internet price of Zhang Yiming, the Chinese billionaire. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.*
tldr; Bitcoin’s inventor Satoshi Nakamoto is now the 20th richest person in the world. Nakamoto owns roughly $60.7 billion in bitcoin, $625 million in bitcoin cash, $169 million in bitcoinsv (BSV), and $191 million in ecash (formerly known as BCHA or Bitcoin ABC). Nakamoto's wealth is above the net worth of Zhang Yiming, the billionaire from China. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.*
tldr; Bitcoin’s inventor Satoshi Nakamoto is now the 20th richest person in the world, according to Forbes’ real-time billionaires’ list. Nakamoto owns roughly $60.7 billion in bitcoin, $625 million in bitcoin cash, $169 million in bitcoinsv (BSV), and $191 million in ecash (formerly known as BCHA or Bitcoin ABC). He is above the net worth of Zhang Yiming, the billionaire from China. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.*
>This means that on October 17, 2021, Nakamoto owns roughly $60.7 billion in bitcoin (BTC), $625 million in bitcoin cash (BCH), $169 million in bitcoinsv (BSV), and $191 million in ecash (formerly known as BCHA or Bitcoin ABC).
BCHA doesnt care, it did a 117% on the 24h
They could move the decimal points pretty easily. Just a simple wallet change so like your 10 could become 1 real easy. Or the other way too Ex ecash 1 BCHA became 1M ecash they moved the decimal place 6 spots so now instead of 1.00000000 it's now 1000000.00
Did BCHA get rug pulled? Lmao
you can never have enough BCHA
There's a list in the Antonopoulos book previously linked https://github.com/bitcoinbook/bitcoinbook/blob/develop/ch10.asciidoc Unfortunately, the list of transaction validation rules appears in the section dealing with unconfirmed transaction propagation. See "Independent Verification of Transactions". As already discussed, verification of unconfirmed transactions is optional, happens before mining. Consensus validation happens after mining. In consensus, the rules about relay fees and dust amounts are not relevant. The rules about child-parent dependency are different Rules about block validity are listed under "Validating a New Block", and that section refers back to the earlier set of transaction verification rules. The missing differences are details, probably not relevant to the question you're asking I think you should pay attention to the block validation rules - especially that the block header contains the hash of the previous block's header. This maintains a chain of linked blocks and prevents retrospective alteration by the impossibility of repeating miners' work in earlier blocks More nuanced, the target hash is stored in the block header. This provides verification that the block has sufficient work. Any observer can calculate the hash of any block and prove that it is less than the target which applied at the time The chapter also describes the time ratio used to adjust the target hash every 2016 blocks Outside the scope of any book ... Why can't a consensus of sybil nodes with different consensus rules supplant the established node network? The answer to this is that the established node network represents a community consensus. This is a behavioral consensus, not a technical consensus. Conceptually, this is soft and fuzzy There could be community controversies which can cause two divergent node networks to arise if each community has enough nodes operated by enough of the right players. This would cause a chain fork. It hasn't happened to Bitcoin. It happened most recently when the BCash developers tried to modify the consensus rules to pay themselves a developer tax out of the mining reward. The community chose to follow the existing rules. The developers implemented their rules. Most outside observers would see that the BCHA (the developers) chain is so poorly supported by nodes, miners, exchanges, merchants that it doesn't exist. Technically, it does still exist because some nodes and miners continue to support it The direct answer to your sybil question is that there's no power in numbers. More subtly, chain forks can arise if there are sufficiently strong communities which separately support different consensus rules
the pain in my eyes when BCHA mooned today, knowing that i sold a few months ago.
Was just scrolling through the top 100 list and saw some new coin called eCash at 32, turns out it was just rebranded BCHA
On CMC: "Bitcoin Cash ABC (BCHA) has rebranded to eCash (XEC) and has redenominated to a 1:1000000 ratio." Is this new or old news? I don't remember a coin beeing in the top 100 called XEC, nonetheless rank 33 atm., when this happened?
tldr; BCHA, now known as eCash, has recently seen an insane 400% rally of the last week. Now is an excellent time to split your BCH and sell your BCHA/XEC. Here's how to do it with as little risk as possible. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.*
Isn’t BCHA a fork of BCH?
Damn...nothing is stopping BCHA.... O\_o
>"So with this insane BCHA/XEC pump I am going through all my old wallets, especially SLP wallet full of satoshis that are now spendable on BCHA without destroying the SLP tokens on BCH. When we send Thiong Deng to his conference, I wanted to follow the donation process. So I imported his BCH address in to Electron Cash as a watch wallet. So today I accidently opened that watch wallet in Electrum ABC and it showed 4 500 000 XEC!!!! So of course I have a look at his BCH ballance and it's only 0.33 This guy literary has a 1500 dollars worth of crypto he does not know about because his Bitcoin.com wallet does not show it."
tldr; Polymath (POLY), Bitcoin Cash ABC (BCHA) and XYO Network (XEC) are among the best performing altcoins over the past 24-hours. Polymath rallied 56% to an intraday high at $0.54 on Friday as its 24-hour trading volume exploded by 2,040%. XYO's price increased 285% over the next day after CoinApp launched a campaign allowing users to earn XYO tokens for participating in a case study. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.*
WTF with Bitcoin Cash ABC (BCHA). So many questions. WTF with the name? WTF with the price action? SO many more questions.
>rebranded BCHA burst into TOP 30 by marketcap neighboring Monero Monero lives on the open sea in a boat how can one neighbor it?
Cool story! I guess we'll never know how it happened. Maybe you were lucky enough to sell your BCHA after the snapshot. Or it could have been a mistake on the end of your exchange. In that case they can correct it and take it back, so I'd move them out right away.
> The biggest gainer on Sunday is a coin called ecash (formally BCHA or Bitcoin ABC) which has jumped 42.4% during the last day. Bitcoin is always the best.
I totally agree. It's good to have a reasonable conversation for once! Regarding XEC, I wish I had seen it earlier than yesterday! I think the rebranding was really smart. They ditched the "fork of a fork of a fork" status, old ugly name "Bitcoin Cash ABC" and ancient website. Instead focusing on what they are actually good at efficient payments. Rebranding also leveraged the sub-penny "low price" trend. I think XEC has a much better chance of entering top 100 now, than it did as BCHA. For now, it is clearly pumped as a marketing strategy, I believe. But that only shows it has big money behind it and big ambition.
Why are BCH and BCHA pumping?
BCHA token sounds interesting.
What is BCHA? an even more shittier BCH?
**Top losers in the last 24h (from top 100):** 1. AVAX (-7.3%) 2. RUNE (-7.2%) 3. AUDIO (-6.6%) 4. SAFEMOON (-6.2%) 5. NEAR (-5.6%) 6. BCHA (-5.5%) 7. HT (-5.5%) 8. ATOM (-5.2%) 9. EGLD (-4.9%) 10. CHZ(-4.7%) ​ (Some of these are down so much only because they pumped so much in previous days)
Damn look at BCHA 35% gai, why I am the one to miss all the opportunities huh
the pain in my eyes when BCHA mooned today, knowing that i sold a few months ago.
They didn’t. BCH is still BCH. Another fork BCHA , is the one that rebranded.
OP is wrong. He made a post without actually knowing the specifics. Bitcoin cash did not rebrand. BCHA did.
You need to edit your post, can’t edit the title. ###Bitcoin cash has not rebranded. It’s BCHA that rebranded.
a moment of silence for everyone who sold BCHA recently
BCHA (Bitcoin cash ABC) has rebranded NOT BCH
BCHA mooning harder than neil armstrong
I dislike all the forks, but I will also admit that I made some good money on selling the tokens that I got from the forks during the last bull (ended up with BCH, BSV, BCHA and BTG over time).
With over 100% increase over the past 7 days, the best performing is BCHA (Bitcoin Cash ABC). Sounds like a shitcoin to me. Anyone know why it's pumping?
tldr; Four low-cap crypto assets are surging, up 90% or more over the course of one week. Ardor (ARDR), Bitcoin Cash ABC (BCHA), Tenset (10SET) and THORchain (RUNE) are among them. Bitcoin is down nearly 5% on the day but up over 16% in the past seven days. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.*
ARDR , BCHA , RUNE , 10SET. Saved you a click.
Four low-cap crypto assets are surging, up 90% or more over the course of one week. As Bitcoin recovered this past week and summited $40,000 again, four altcoins jumped wildly in price, coming off their recent lows. The first crypto asset making a strong rally is blockchain-as-a-service provider Ardor (ARDR), which holds a market cap of roughly $233 million. The altcoin made significant gains from a seven-day low of $0.14 to a high of $0.35, according to CoinGecko. The move marks a 150% surge in just one week. ARDR is still down from its all-time high of $2.04. The second asset turning in big gains this week is Bitcoin Cash ABC (BCHA), which holds a market cap of approximately $863 million. The Bitcoin Cash (BCH) fork moved off a low of $26.18 to a high of $53.62 in just seven days, representing a 104% price increase. The rally brings BCHA closer to its all-time high of $57.59. Next up is interoperable liquidity network THORchain (RUNE), which hit a low of $3.33 and a high of $6.69 in one week. The move represents an increase of over 100% in just seven days. RUNE has retraced since its climb and is now trading at $6.21 at time of writing. Another altcoin making strides this week is deflationary token Tenset (10SET). The crypto asset turned in a major performance this week, jumping by 96% from a seven-day low of $1.23 to a high of $2.41. Tenset holds a market cap of roughly $160 million at time of writing. As for Bitcoin, the leading cryptocurrency is down nearly 5% on the day, but up over 16% in the past seven days.
BCHA up about 50% today, 65% for the week, it's going to change to XEC with a recommendation of 1 million to 1, so if you have 10 BCHA it will convert to 10 million XEC.
Whats this BCHA (bitcoin cash ABC) ?
Mine has been BCHA, with the redomination and rename tomorrow its going rocket
BCHA soon to be redominated and renamed XEC
BCHA 1 hrs = green 24 hrs = green 1 week = green 1 month = green 1 year = green All = green Check it on coinbase yourself.
Hi, If I have 10 BCHA and once they redominate it (1 to 1 million) on 1st July and convert it to XEC how much will I have ? Also on coinbase that is the only coin that is in the positive for hourly, daily, weekly, monthly, annually and all time.
The big gainers of the week Bitcoin Cash ABC (BCHA) - 105% up for the week Internet Computer (ICP) - 58% up for the week Dogecoin (DOGE) - 51% up for the week
India Bans Crypto again. President Trump Jr. endorses Digital Petrol USD Schiff Jr. endorses other forms of Bitcoin like Bitcoin Cash, Bitcoin Black, Bitcoin Diamond, Bitcoin SV, Bitcoin BCHA, Bitcoin 2, Bitcoin Platinum, Bitcoin Gold, Bitcoin Private, Bitcoin HD , Bitcoin Red. Communities are divided arguing which Bitcoin is real. Elon Musk tweets about taking BABYDOGE to Moon 🌙 Tether has printed another Trillion yesterday.
I'm trying to get rid of some altcoins, forks from back in the day that I just let sit (BSV, BCHA, BCD, BTG), at least the ones that seem sellable. I have done trading on Coinbase Pro where it's simple. Sell your BTC, ACH/Wire transfer to your bank. Minimal fees. However sketchier exchanges like Gate.io aren't going to be able to connect to your bank. My thought is that most sales seem to use USDT or USDC, and using a stablecoin I can send funds out. However, stablecoins on Ethereum seem to have terrible fees. So selling $100 worth of an altcoin just to pay another $20 in transfer fees seems very annoying. Anyone have any thoughts? Of course there are probably some low fee coins out there I'm not aware of but at the same time I'd like to avoid buying some mysterious coin that is great for low fee transfers but impossible to sell later on while creating tons of capital gains reporting situations. Any tips?
lol, I sent a teeny bit of BCHA to binance.com about 19 days ago just to see what would happen. An hour ago I got an e-mail >You've received 0.02133105 BCHA in your Binance account. Oh yeah, I'm gonna get me a different fraction of a coin!
i just randomly received a $0.05 worth of BCHA on Binance. What does this mean?
> Brand deception BCH works just as described in the Satoshi Nakamoto whitepaper. Cheap, fast, reliable transactions. BTC doesn't. I'd argue that given that BTC is being marketed as a store of value, having had transactions fees between $10-$50 just a few weeks ago, and where transactions could be stuck for hours or days if you had the bad luck that your wallet guessed a too low transaction fee, then BTC is engaging in brand deception. The BTC as is works today has little to do with the Bitcoin described in the whitepaper. Furthermore, both the Bitcoin name and its source code are in the public domain, anyone can use it. > toxic thought leaders Both Amaury Séchet and Craig Wright, which I contend could be quite toxic, were forked off to their own minority chains. Furthermore, instigating minimal karma rules in /r/btc also has made the sub more peacful. The community is way more peacul and welcoming than it was a year ago, as a lot of disuptive elements are no longer part of the community or have to do a minimal amount of work before being able to troll and inject toxicity in the sub. > insecure blockchain The miners securing BCH are mostly the same ones securing BTC. Theminers will protect BCH because it is their fallback option, should BTC fail. Furthermore, hash rate follows price and not the other way around. There is no technical reason for BTC to be more secure than BCH, it's only a matter of the current BTC/BCH price ratio. Finally, nobody ever successfully attacked the BCH chain. > disasterous bi-annual forking policy This is a thing of the past. The recent network upgrade on May 15th went without a hitch and wasn't a hard fork. Besides, hard forks are only a problem if they are contentious. And the main sources of contention were forked off. > chaotic and adversarial development. BCH currently has six! different node implementations that collaborate and work together to improve the network. The main source of chaotic and adeverserial development was Amaury Séchet, and he is running his own for now (BCHA/e-Cash). > Block times are supposed to come every 10 mins but in reality they come in at wild unpredictable times (from 1 hour to 2 mins) The 10 minute block time is an average, it fluctuates depending on has rate variations, given that both BCH and BTC and the other forks share the same hash rate. That's why BTC is also and has recently been subject to wildly fluctuating block times, just because of price volatility (mining probability is dependent on both hash rate and price). > It's a terrible coin for payments and the markets don't care. But that's not why people buy it for. Wrong. Bitcoin Cash works exceedingly well for payments, especially for smaller purchases, because 0-conf transactions are secure enough for such purchases (there is no replace-by-fee on BCH, and given that there is ample available block space, a transaction has 99,99% probability to make it in the next block). You can see an example of a Bitcoin Cash payment here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dXwGV_HXAms Just try it out for yourself. Download Bitcoin.com's wallet on two of your devices, and send BCH back and forth between those devices. You'll see that the payments are very fast. > And there's no true community - just a bunch of early whales and sychophants pumping out propaganda to keep their huge bags afloat. Have you ever seen a r/bitcoincashmarkets That's an odd statement. The biggest Bitcoin Cash community community is at /r/btc, which currently has 543,833 subscribers which is one-sixth of /r/Bitcoin at 2,958,859 subscribers and more than half of /r/Ethereum at 960,682 subscribers. Maybe the poster was confused by the smaller /r/BitcoinCash sub, a smaller BitcoinCash community which currently sites at 82,392 subscribers?
I send $1 of BCHA to Binance just for fun (they have deposits of BCHA disabled). Currently on confirmation 20 of 2 and still going! :D https://i.imgur.com/vBYaGyH.png I wasn't expecting it to work; Worth at least $1 in entertainment.
Bitcoin Cash has survived being a minority fork when it split from BTC and being a majority fork, twice, with the BSV and BCHA splits. How many other coins have proven their resistance to capture and decentralization? When Bitcoin Cash split from BTC it had to recreate every single piece of tech, it was reset to day 0 in terms of adoption. No exchanges, no wallets, no block explorers, no businesses accepting it. Bitcoin Cash did this with no ICO. There was no foundation with millions of dollars to support BCH but still Bitcoin Cash is a top 10 coin, accepted by every major exchange and often one of the few coins initially accepted when a company joins crypto (Paypal). This is possible because Bitcoin Cash's primary goal remains unchanged. To become the best form of money, better than Gold. Money is a technology and the best version of it is Gold. Paper money (fiat) was an attempt to become better than Gold as money but we've seen it fail many times already. When you consider the timeframe that money has existed, paper money hasn't been around long and since we see them being hyperinflated out of existence all the time it seems it is a failed technology. 'Bitcoin' the technology is better than gold as money and that technology is best seen in Bitcoin Cash (BCH).
Bitcoin Cash has survived being a minority fork when it split from BTC and being a majority fork, twice, with the BSV and BCHA splits. When Bitcoin Cash split from BTC it had to recreate every single piece of tech, it was reset to day 0 in terms of adoption. No exchanges, no wallets, no block explorers, no businesses accepting it. Bitcoin Cash did this with no ICO. There was no foundation with millions of dollars to support BCH but still Bitcoin Cash is a top 10 coin, accepted by every major exchange and often one of the few coins initially accepted when a company joins crypto (Paypal). This is possible because Bitcoin Cash's primary goal remains unchanged. To become the best form of money that ever existed. Money is a technology and the best version of it is Gold. Paper money (fiat) was an attempt to become better than Gold as money but we've seen it fail many times already. When you consider the timeframe that money has existed, paper money hasn't been around long and since we see them being hyperinflated out of existence all the time it seems it is a failed technology. 'Bitcoin' the technology is better than gold as money and that technology is best seen in Bitcoin Cash (BCH).
Keep it simple for the simple minds chasing easy quick money. Most people that are noobs and entering don’t care what a coin does as long as it goes up. That’s what ETC is. A coin that pumped and people saw it go up and FOMO cause it sounds like ETH but “cheaper” and also cause media showcased the insane pump more FOMO buyers came in. Same thing happened right before Coinbase went public. ETC pumped for four days. A noob doesn’t know the difference between ETC or ETH and when it comes to their eyes looking at numbers they see the higher pump % and “cheaper” price. Same reason Bitcoin named coins pumped too like BCH BSV BTG BCHA. Just talk to average new crypto retail Joe. “Why did you buy BitTorrent?” “It has Bit in the name and my friend said to buy everything with Bit in it.” If you can think like a crypto noob you will make millions from these FOMO pumps guys. This is where the money is at not just HODLing some coin backed by real case use.
ETC, BCHA, BCH, BTG all pumping so hard. Seems like I should've just put some money on anything with Bitcoin or Ethereum in the name. 😑
Anyone know of an exchange that allows BCHA deposits? The popular ones like Binanace all say "disabled due to maintenance" and the maintenance has been at least a month now.
Take your BTC public address and plop it into [blockchair](https://blockchair.com/). That will give you totals for BTC, BCH and BSV. For BCHA, you'll have to get the equivalent BCH address. Just click the BCH link for your address on blockchair, the resulting page will show you the BCH address, which you can paste back into the search bar to get BCHA totals. For BTG you'll have to use something like https://btgexplorer.com/ to see if you have coins still.
yes i agree, making the assertion that 99% of miners will not support it is similar to making the assertion that 99% of users will not support the old chain. However, miner support is more transparent due to block signalling, where was user support can easily be sybilled unless people all do some holder based voting ( signing a message based on your keys ) I think people are trivialising how dangerous the UASF was, Bitcoin is much bigger now with institutional investors they will not like the possibility of a network split. We should commit to activating via miner signalling and if some don't do it we need to address their concerns or making mining more decentralized. Cowboy behaviour and nonchalantly waving a nuke around (UASF) is reckless. This is why i quit Bcash, since they HF everyone 6 months and created multiple splits of bcash BSV, BCHA, BCHN and probably more ever time the upgrade.
It's more than a "challenge". This is simply outrageous. On two fronts: 1. As a PSA, I can tell you right now that the coins suspended on [Binance.US](https://Binance.US) are BCHA Bitcoin Cash ABC, EOS EOS, HBAR Hedra Hashgraph, IOTA MIOTA, NANO NANO, and ZEC Zcash. 2. If I were posting on 4chan, this would be a sticky with 1,000 replies. As it is on Leddit, I got a bot removing my OC post because I don't have enough "karma" or some such shit that I don't give a shit about.
I didn't say that it did, I pointed those out as separate issues I find with other cryptos, probably not my biggest concern though. Satoshi has never spent any of those coins, I actually think thats a really great example that should have been followed by other crypto developers. making a company to support your crypto, particularly if its proof of stake or some other less distributed validation system is a potential point of failure. satoshi made Bitcoin a public good, take BNB for an example, theres an awful large possibility of china shitting it down that doesn't seem worth the large amounts of money put unto it in my opinion. yes. bch is an evolution of bitcoin, creating two competing chains benefits thoses invested in it. they had no down side, free to choose to support either or both chains. if you weren't invested in the first place its doesnt impact you at all. making forks of bitcoin is an altogether better way to address differences in the direction of development, this is part of the genius of the design of bitcoin satoshi had, while forks can on the one hand fracture the support, it ensures when theres a divergence of opinion that users benefit of the eventual out come regardless if they choose to hold both or get an opportunity to sell the chain they don't support for more of the one they do or something else. seeing as BCH has held a spot in the top 20 coins since its inception and is even been gaining against bitcoin and moving back up in rank I think thats pretty valid evidence that its been a net benefit for the crypto space. both chains today have different objectives and BTC has really narrowed its focus on being a store of value, while BCH has moved to focus on being fast and cheap and allowing more experimentation with its extra block space and now its smartbch side chain. the bch 51% attack was actually stopped by miners demonstrating they are willing to supply additional hash power to protect the network. this is one thing BCH needs to work on, smartBCH will help with this as validators for smartBCH must be miners who stake their hashing power, and gas fees will be paid to them, increasing miner profitability and thus brining in more hashing power. you can't stop anyone from forking the blockchain, btc also has many forks, this is isn't really a solid point. and again theres really nothing wrong with making a fork. if as a developer you idea requires making a fork to pursue it go for it. if anyone else wants to support it thats their choice. competition is healthy and everyone that held coins from before the fork would get them on both chains. as for BSV and BCHA those are both vanity projects by individuals. BCH development is distributed theres 6 different node implementations, which means no one can force a change into the code easily with out support from across the different teams. this is really how BCH came to be in the first place, segwit was forced in despite many not supporting it, bitcoin unlimited and bitcoin abc left and supported the fork, before segwit there was multiple dev teams running their own nodes on BTC, now its just core, and once again they are having the same issue of code being forced in without consensus about it through a soft fork. thats a major weakness with BTC having only one group in charge of updating the code, there no way to really hold them accountable if theres a dispute.
I did not think it was bad until BCH split last time and CoinBase kept my BCHA. I have moved everything to a wallet so no one can take my well earned coins.
Any exchanges accept BCHA (The ABC Fork of Bitcoin Cash) deposits? I want to dump them, but every exchange I try (binance, hitbtc, bitfinex) say deposits are suspended.
Bitcoin Cash is a true Bitcoin. This is how I’ve lost my $20 worth of Bitcoin Cash by sending to Bitcoin address. Turns out BTC and BCHA is different blockchain.. Stupid..
What is happening with BCHA?! I thought it was basically a dead coin.
Countless. XRP, EOS, BCH, BSV, BCHA, TRX, XVG, ETC to name some with a bigger market cap. With small market caps you have more shitcoins than actually good ones.
Feature to view branches of coins. Say you're viewing BTC. You would see Bitcoin Cash/Bitcoin gold etc. Under BCH you'd see BCHA, etc.
Bad guide. Never enter you private keys online. Do it yourself and save the risk and fees. Send BCash to a new legacy address using Electron-Cash. Check on Blockchain BSV hasnt moved. Swap BSV for BCash using ElectrumSV to send to https://changehero.io Send total BCash to New Address. Swap BCHA for BCash using ElectrumABC to send to https://abc.voluntarism.dev/ Swap this shitcoin for Bitcoin using https://fixedfloat.com/
Bad guide. Never enter you private keys online. Do it yourself and save the risk and fees. Send BCash to a new legacy address using Electron-Cash. Check on Blockchain BSV hasnt moved. Swap BSV for BCash using ElectrumSV to send to https://changehero.io Send total BCash to New Address. Swap BCHA for BCash using ElectrumABC to send to https://abc.voluntarism.dev/
Bad guide. Never enter you private keys online. Do it yourself and save the risk and fees. Send BCash to a new legacy address using Electron-Cash. Check on Blockchain BSV hasnt moved. Swap BSV for BCash using ElectrumSV to send to https://changehero.io Send total BCash to New Address. Swap BCHA for BCash using ElectrumABC to send to https://abc.voluntarism.dev/