XEC

gr8ful4

Fees are even lower in BCH and in the future. LTC has a limited blocksize so works as BTC before hitting the blocksize limit. BCH has a current limit of x4 compared to LTC and starting from next month a dynamic blocksize that will grow with demand without being spammable like BSV. BCH has CashFusion (also implemented in some mobile wallets). It has AnyHedge, one if not the best on-chain hedging tool in the whole crypto space. It has fought at least three battles (BTC, BSV and XEC) and therefore has a hardened community of OGs.

anonymouscitizen2

1mb blocks are not obsolete, with segwit there was an weight increase to 4mb and “small block” bitcoin is currently the most popular crypto for payments and saving (excl. stables) by far. Small block Bitcoin is doing phenomenally well, “large block” (which still couldn’t come close to global scale) is dead in a ditch. BSV, BCH, and XEC are all <1% of Bitcoin COMBINED. You can choose to use BCH, BSV or whatever you want, stop trying to force others. Your ideas are so bad they have destroyed 99% of everyones value who believed them, 3x in a row. Bitcoin was meant to be saved, thats why it has a hard cap and is hard to produce. Thats why satoshi compares it to gold. You need to simply need to face reality. Crypto as cash is not popular, the market does not want it. A crypto savings vehicle is 10000000x more popular and people want it. Its that simple. Use BCH if you want and lose more value, just stop trying to sabotage the Bitcoin that is actually useful and popular and make it another useless -99% fork.

bitcoincashautist

>irrelevant fork It had its bottom of relevance during 2019-2020, but with recent upgrades it's gaining more relevance because it has more to offer than just BTC but with bigger blocks: L1 DeFi & native tokens baked into consensus. We're growing our own network effect as "BitcoinCash", and after 7 years we accumulated some Lindy, too. >BCH has less than 1% of the hashrate of BTC - I guess even some bigger miners could attack BCH at this point, you don't even have to argue with pools here. Just because it's 1% of BTC doesn't mean the sha256d miners are offering it to sale to whomever asks, the hash is too busy mining what pays. If you're a wannabe attacker, what's easier: to rent out ASICs for sha256d, or to rent out GPU cluster or botnet to attack w/e other-algo coin - even if it's the only coin with the algo. I feel safer buying security from the specialists: the sha256d mining industry, and survival of all chains with their algo is in their interest, even if we only bring them 1% of their combined revenue. Why would you attack your paying regular customer? Also, if an attacker can rent hash for an attack, then a defender can rent hash for a defense too, making the cost of attack unknowable. In BCH-BSV and BCH-XEC forks, whales have shown their work behind the scenes when hash allocation was not matching the optimal distribution just based on block reward. Someone paid for the hash, out of band. Ultimately, all networks are secured by their economies, and with USD 12B mcap, BCH is not a small economy on an absolute scale, even though it is relatively small compared to BTC. >it's totally natural that two forks of the BTC don't find blocks at the same rate as both see different growths in hashrate, even if they run identical code The difference would've been much less if the EDAA was not as bad as it was. I did a plot [here](https://bitcoincashresearch.org/uploads/default/original/2X/5/5148db265cf6095e7555b1a4b8ce48bc70b29029.png), notice the anomaly?

wisequote

That was an attack on BCH, just like XEC was an attack soon after. There’s a reason those attacks happen on BCH not on BTC; mainly because those financing the attacks are worried about the working Bitcoin (BCH) where transactions are next to free, not the neutered BTC!

sparkcrz

You know satoshi was a big blocker. And you know what BCH, XMR and XEC are doing "with the same tech".

Alex-Crypto

How so? These are UTXOs— there’s no room for Trojan. That’s why this was in heavy debate since 2018 or even earlier. It wasn’t something new out of nowhere like the others. Also new op_codes have been helpful. Adding is fiercely debated in BCH — bitcoincashresearch.org will show plenty of HEATED debates for years on even a multiply opcode. That’s one reason we cast off BSV and XEC.

New_Reputation

Bought more $LUNC -- its down -99.9999999% from ATH - ofcourse it wont go to ATH or even near it but retail/ new people in crypto will think "WHAT IF" -Top Gainers on Perps today have all 1000 on their ticker -Latest pump is $XEC with 50% gain even with $900m mc-Only one that doesn't pumped yet is $LUNC I believe $LUNC pump is coming soon

EdgeLord19941

It's a hyperbole, the project looks incredibly dead to me, the only reason you could have to bring this up is because you're a BCH or XEC bagholder

Kike328

thankfully blockchain technology is transparent and you can find it by yourself checking the coinbase addresses. that been said, that’s the negative part of forks, that are completely unfair and big guys get the big part of it and have no responsibility of giving it to you. If the XEC team would be smarter, they would have redistributed it at launch, but no, they preferred the good publicity of giving free money even if that means things like this.

BCHcain

I just want XEC listed so Americans have an opportunity to trade it. It's a great coin.

KarolSJZ

eCash $XEC is that what Satoshi want to create. Bitcoin but much better.

1982LikeABoss

I can’t remember who XEC were before they changed but I heard about it, put $100 into the token 3 days before the swap, they also paid at about 100:1 in tokens. Anyway, over the next few weeks, I earned $1000 profit. I can’t say it’s always the case or, as I can’t remember who they used to be (on binance), whether they take better care of their investors but I can say it paid off… not a brag, just maybe a glimmer of hope for you. You’re down already, so what’s the last $10 to risk?

donjoe0

MEXC also has a no-KYC basic user level, but only supports XEC. Or you could try creating a new user on CoinEx through a VPN, like the ProtonVPN free version offers 3 exits, and the Netherlands and Japan ones might work for this.

wisequote

There is nothing called “counterfeit” project when it is a clear fork; it is distinct from BTC, but not “counterfeit”; actually, one can argue a non-functional Bitcoin that costs $50 to send a tx is a counterfeit Bitcoin as it fails to be peer to peer electronic cash as the Bitcoin’s white paper title. So, distinct forks where you have to use your brain to discern which is the closest to Bitcoin as Satoshi created and left it behind: - Bitcoin Cash - BCH: Peer to peer electronic cash. - Bitcoin Core - BTC: Settlement Coin for L2 and Store of Value. - Bitcoin SV: Claims to be true to the peer to peer electronic cash spirit, copies BCH talking points, but provides a copyright and corporate control structure and introduces non-electronic-cash use-cases such as data storage, etc. - XEC: Bitcoin Cash but with a miner tax (Coinbase tax) that goes to the development team council. - Bitcoin Gold, Diamond, etc are failed forks based on technology decisions rather than the above discussed economic and game-theory splits. - Litecoin: Unlike all above forms, Litecoin is a standalone currency but is essentially Bitcoin with a larger block size (and a far worst distribution of wealth because it was effectively pre-mined) however, it follows the BTC camp in all upgrades and approach to scaling, making it yet another settlement coin and store of value rather than peer to peer electronic cash. Nexa: Like Litecoin, it’s a stand alone fork of Bitcoin Cash (doesn’t share the genesis block) but employs a lot of the BCH technology alongside yet unreleased technology that the BU team develops for Nexa and BCH. So, based on all the above, it’s absolutely childish to call any “counterfeit”, in reality, any person with a clear understanding of what cryptocurrency is and what Bitcoin is and is meant to be, can easily decide which of the above is peer to peer electronic cash. So,

RowanSkie

1. 2019 51% happened due to someone doublespending 2. 2020 51% is on BCHA/XEC, not BCH.

Miljenko-i-Manjina

I tried it once with XEC (obscure coin) to gain back losses from ADA. Had luck because it was listed on Binance at the time. Never tried it again.

Miljenko-i-Manjina

Same thing happened to me, I sold with a slight loss at $2.80. I got my profits back elsewhere (XEC probably didn’t hear about that one).

krakensupport

Hey u/Miljenko-i-Manjina 👋 Unfortunately, XEC is not available on Kraken at this time. For a complete list of available cryptocurrencies, [check out our support article.](https://support.kraken.com/hc/en-us/articles/360000678446-Cryptocurrencies-available-on-Kraken) Happy trading! 📈 Bria from Kraken Support 🐙

Miljenko-i-Manjina

Don’t know if there’s XEC on Coinbase or Kraken, but it’s good for swing trading. Also try football clubs shitcoins like Santos or Lazio.

ShotCryptographer523

Thank you. I didn't add Sui, Rollbit or XEC. Haven't been really impressed with Sui. I think Rollbit has lots of potential especially seeing Stake is in a bit of strife, but wanted more top 50 in the mix.

LordIgorBogdanoff

Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin/Bitcoin Core are the "original" Bitcoin, being identical pre-forking. The former follows the white paper more closely while the latter is way different &#x200B; Look up "Bitcoin Ca$h P O dcast #85" (typo intentional, $ is just an s) for a big redpill. Spoiler Alert: The good guys lost, but have recuperated after splits with XEC and BSV (which are another story in and of themselves). If you *really* want to understand, before you do that, google "COINTELPRO".

bitcoincashautist

We survived 2 more forks (vs BSV and vs XEC) and came out as winners. We've been tempered in fire, survived both small block (BTC) cooption, extremely big block cooption (BSV) and dev tax & centralization attempt (XEC) Entire time we've been busy building, and now have full UTXO DeFi and native token capabilities and can go for the DeFi cake. At the same time BTCers are begging for OP_CTV which is just a small subset of current BCH L1 capabilities.

QuartzPuffyStar

OP is comparing apples to oranges. BCH wasn't intended as a store of value, and a high price isn't its purpose, quite the contrary actually. You then have XEC which takes BCH's objectives further.

legionticket

Tbh I only know NANO & XEC.... but waltochain? Nah

MichaelAischmann

Out of the top 100: 3 out of 4 coins in the red are Bitcoin forks (BCH, BSV, XEC).

gr8ful4

It's secure because most miners have been big blockers back in the day. They still have bags of BCH and would protect it were one to attack it. See BSV. See XEC.

MichaelAischmann

Is this the week of Bitcoin forks? BCH, BSV, XEC - all pumping.

Iphone17promax

XEC has its rocket boosters on today

insanityzwolf

Thanks. I'm trying to understand what makes it a scam coin as you described it above. It doesn't have any premine/instamine/tax/confiscation the way ETH, XEC, BSV etc do. In fact by the time the fork occurred over half of all bitcoin had already been minted. As for trying to attack it, any of the coins in the top 20 have $1B+ in valuation and are targets for all these malicious entities. Is BCH any worse? Compared to, say, SOL, or the whole ETH/ETC polemic?

CardanoCrusader

How many times has Bitcoin already been forked, and with a lot less liquidity at stake? The following is a list of notable hard forks splitting bitcoin by date and/or block: * Bitcoin Cash: Forked at block 478558, 1 August 2017, for each bitcoin (BTC), an owner got 1 Bitcoin Cash (BCH) * Bitcoin SV: Forked at block 556766, 15 November 2018, for each Bitcoin Cash (BCH), an owner got 1 Bitcoin SV (BSV). * eCash: Forked at block 661648, 15 November 2020, for each Bitcoin Cash (BCH), an owner got 1,000,000 eCash (XEC). * Bitcoin Gold: Forked at block 491407, 24 October 2017, for each bitcoin (BTC), an owner got 1 Bitcoin Gold (BTG) *

Shibinator

> Whatever you claim it does, I can name 10 other coins that do it better. A proven ability to govern the network through forks, rejecting centralised dev teams (as with Bitcoin Core and the BCHA team that became XEC). There is literally no other major crypto that has EVER shown they can resist their own central dev team - and thus if their central dev team screws up the whole project is sunk. BCH is the only network to prove immune to that weakness, most others have not been tested. Ethereum Classic the only one with somewhat similar credibility in this regard.

eastcoastguy128

BCHABC briefly went up and was rebranded as XEC. I think XEC is something like 1:100 million of BCHABC. Perhaps it’s a sat or satoshi on a different chain.

sparkcrz

BCH, XEC, XMR, XNO... all the p2p electronic cash solutions

QuartzPuffyStar

Depends on the time you want to invest for. If you are for the long term, something like SC or XEC would be fine, both are sturdy projects with low visibility, but which have a quite good potential to reach at least a $ as time advances and BTC gets more and more expensive.

takemidown

I regret buying XEC. One guy shilled it in a group I used to be in, some years back and I bought it. It's the worst.

MysteriousJello2

* Tron * ICP * EOS * CHZ * XEC

knowbodynows

Sloppy "humor". BCH is on that drive indeed, as well as the following shitcoins: BSV, XEC, BTC, BTG, etc.

bitcoincashautist

Bitcoin Cash is not gone, it was left for dead but it's never been more alive. BCH had this problem at time of the fork that BCHers were a mixed bunch, everyone having a different idea of what BCH needs to be. It took BSV and ABC (now called XEC, eCash) forks to filter the community and now BCH-ers are more aligned then ever and figuring out UTXO DeFi and how to build a permisisonless unstoppable p2p cash for decentralized economy. The inscription lists all the upgrades to the tech. Another problem for BCH was that everyone who held BTC got the same amount of BCH, this is just how forks are and BCH paid a big price for tracing back to Bitcoin genesis, because in practice it meant that BTC-ers could slow-rug us for years. But now it looks like nobody has any more BCH to dump on BCH believers - we bought it all and established a floor, and inflation is low and halving is coming. And we had our mini-moon to $1.5k in '21, so from my PoV the future never looked better.

takemidown

XEC gives me the heebie-jeebies.

eCashInformer

It's a shame that these industry leading exchanges didn't do the right thing, by giving their users the split coins (XEC).

kptnkook

In fact yes. There is a reason other exchanges put happily supported this project. It is not a nonsense fork and any player with some insight - which you would hope leading exchanges would have - would know what to do with it. And ignoring this piece of tech and the team behind it is abysmal practice. Also, this isn't even about listing. It is about giving their users what belongs to them. "Adding support" in this case for a Bitcoin fork is literally 30 minute of work. Look at all the trash they list every month and tell me they don't have "the time" to support XEC.

ISpankYourMother

I once lost $400 shorting (I think it was) XEC. It went up to my force sell and immediately crashed around 60% after.

takemidown

Almighty XEC aka Ecash.

KarolSJZ

Only eCash $XEC.

CarolineEllisonFTX


cthulhucomes

Haha! I’ve got zero money in XEC as of yet.

Wonzky

Nobody knows man, and I can't tell if this is a random shill for XEC

MichaelAischmann

Can anyone think of any reason why I should keep 100,000 XEC?

Sidivan

I figured it was something like that. The tricky part was that there are 4 GitHub links. They appear to legit. Like, retrieving the exchange address and finding a new token. The interesting thing is I actually received 29,000,000 XEC and 120,000 MGRT. If the contract just injects somebody’s wallet, why go through the hassle of delivering a token?

Boring-Isopod-1712

Bitcoin is a store of value over time.. eCash ($XEC) is a fork of bitcoin and could be the mass adoption crypto everybody is waiting for.

MichaelAischmann

Does anyone know a reason for the price jump of ecash (XEC) in the last 24 hours?

MichaelAischmann

Does anyone know a reason for the price jump of ecash (XEC) in the last 24 hours?

BCHcain

I support XEC because I believe in it, and it's the only coin I recommend because it's the only one I really think has the most potential. With that said, feel free to continue supporting whatever projects you support, and I'll continue supporting eCash. Have a lovely day.

LovelyDayHere

XEC is the only coin I see you shill, ever. In the past, I've recommended Monero for having default stronger privacy than BCH. So I'll call you a XEC maximalist. Or what other coins do you recommend.

LovelyDayHere

At least BCH didn't implement a dev tax like XEC.

MichaelAischmann

and ofc the answer is ecash XEC. :D

wisequote

The supply didn’t double, one time decided to change the experiment and route transaction fees to non-miners, we kicked them out. As far as I’m concerned, BTC no longer qualifies as Bitcoin, but rather a settlement token for an experimental IOU web 3 banking network comprised of LN, Liquid, etc. So we’re still at 21 million Bitcoins that are forever next to free to transact on-chain with; everything else is a new either technical fork (BSV) or a logical/economical fork (BTC/XEC) of Bitcoin’s original game theory parameters (BCH). It’s ironic you mentioned SmartBCH; this is a standalone solution that has nothing to do with an otherwise working perfectly underlying on-chain network (BCH). LN is a supposed scaling solution to an otherwise broken, unusable L1 (BTC). A drastic difference, but thank you for raising a very cute fact: LN, Liquid AND SmartBCH work (or would work) flawlessly on BCH because of the absolutely unstoppable L1. Your BTC can’t even support its proposed scaling solution, the LN developers themselves admit that you’ll eventually need to increase the blocksize. Hilarious. Your secure base layer is useless and is only meant now to power an highly experimental and absolutely insecure 2nd layer, so that secure is literally wasted and useless. You might be a native English speaker, but you absolutely misunderstood everything Bitcoin and crypto related.

KallistiOW

> (b) miners opting in to a monetary policy that allocates to whitelisted R&D orgs Actually, that's XEC. BCH rejected this proposal.

BCHcain

XEC and ETH pretty much.

BCHcain

eCash (XEC) is a bitcoin fork so coin distribution is same as btc. You can learn more about the project at e.cash

KallistiOW

Craig Wright still litigating. Most definitely NOT Satoshi. BSV has zero legitimacy. XEC still trying I guess. They're trying to implement Avalanche I guess? Good luck to them, I don't think they'll get very far.

MilesPower

This is basically how all forks will always end up. Satoshi warned against it from the start. Once you fracture once it's inevitable that you will fracture again and again until the teams running the projects, like your own XEC are small, underfunded and centralized. On the plus side you can roll out updates super quick and roll them back if shit goes poorly without need for consensus.

bitcoincashautist

>Has there ever been an initiative to rename the project to stop confusion? In a decentralized system, who is supposed to drive that initiative and why? Both BTC and BCH blockchains are just data. The mapping of a blockchain to a real-world currency is not decided by the blockchain or by miners or by any single individual - it is decided by market/social forces, which are external to the blockchain, and they seem to have settled on BTC=Bitcoin BCH=Bitcoin Cash, even though technically they're both instances of the original "Bitcoin" invention. Everyone wants their coin to appreciate in value, if most BCH holders don't see rebranding as positive for long-term price, then who would support the initiative? A lot of exchanges and businesses support both, one is orange one is green. Where are these "confused" masses? It would be a burden on even indifferent entities such as CEX-es to change names/tickers and for what? For those rare few who blindly click? >Why insist on the name if the battle was lost? >What are the worst things regarding BCH in your opinion? I think insisting on "Bitcoin Cash is Bitcoin" did it more harm than good. Problem is - it is all permissionless, you can't tell others what talking points to press on, and old habits die hard. Technically, both BTC and BCH (and other forks) are all "Bitcoin" as in instances of the original invention and descendants of the first Bitcoin blockchain - but if the market/social forces are calling only BTC "Bitcoin" then fighting against that is counter-productive IMO. Cut your losses and move on. Another annoying narrative is "price doesn't matter" - the f- it doesn't. I loved BTC back in '14 when it was magical Internet money, it worked amazing, but I also loved the idea that I was an early adopter, that I discovered something that's going to be big and could bring me riches. As part of my due-diligence I followed the '15/'16 debates closely, and small block arguments were a load of crap - but the market didn't care, BTC was embraced by big tech and big finance anyway and so it mooned. I hold some BTC too, because I like to make money - but I know what I'm buying and why. Another "worst" for BCH was to keep comparing itself with BTC. BTC objectively has crap tech (you may disagree, but this is just to make some other point not to start an argument about it) - other blockchains with much better tech were created and had whole ecosystems grow around them, while BCH was trying to do the same old trick. Internal struggles didn't help, we had BSV and XEC split off. Now, finally, it looks like the project has found a good direction and some quality people with conviction and able to execute: p2p cash uses + UTXO smart contract capabilities to rival Cardano. Cash is always exchanged for something - it only makes sense that that "something" be exchanged as trustlessly as the magical-internet-money cash. I want unstoppable decentralized p2p cash system.

symmetric69

The more pissed people get that there should be a reversal, the less money you know they have left because they DCAd into too many dumps. Save your money and buy back below 5k USD, we have never been in a dump like this before, 18k is looking like a joke and will evaporate any minute. Saylor is dumping his positions, he is not a fool. All bitcoin forks are dumping to oblivion, BCH, XEC, BSV, you know why? Because rich hodlers who didn't give a fuck are now dumping their forked coins on panic mode.

phillipsjk

The train station looks empty because there is blockspace for all reasonable transactions. A full platform in that visualization means the coin is no longer functioning as money. [This graph of a boring implementation detail should not have a reason to exist](https://jochen-hoenicke.de/queue/#BTC,24h,weight). It makes no sense to use your most expensive storage (RAM) to hold transactions: instead of just including them in a block. Flowee the Hub does not even have a mempool: instead storing pending transactions in a database, then tagging them with the block they are included in if confirmed. Also Bitcoin Cash has two major splits after the fork from BTC: creating BSV and XEC. I was able to trade both for BCH at about 1:1, so I am "up" 4x more than one would surmise from looking at the price chart alone. Litecoin has the same problems BTC does. It is only scaling through experimental hacks; instead of actually increasing the blocksize directly. LTC is essentially BTC's testnet these days.

phillipsjk

There are a few coins that still try to act as money in the top 100. Dash, BCH, XEC come to mind.

sirixv

Some people gonna hate me but I’m saying XEC. Out of all the things out there, this seems like the closest version of digital money, made for mass adoption and a clear vision. The devs are hustling despite negativity, which it got a lot from people trying make this project look dead. The technologies they keep implementing to grow the coin is astonishing. Im not shilling cause I don’t have any XEC myself. I just did big research because I was once interested, but my money is mir in micro caps that’s why I don’t own any XEC

MisplacedPhilosopher

The RocketFi (RocketFi.money) on Pancakeswap seems like a genuine project. Not a scam. However, that doesn't mean the token price will rise. If you are a new investor, I would recommend you stick to projects listed on Binance. Projects go through many checks and audits to list on Binance. From the rich BTC to it's more affordable cousins like DASH, DCR, DGB, XEC etc. you have a lot to choose from. Do you research based on what you think is more important to you. I like projects with good prospects which are highly decentralized, censorship resistant and their tokens must have low transaction fees and high liquidity.

fiercygoat

Thank you so much for finding the lost XEC on the blockchain. I thought it wouldn't be possible. You gave me hope! God bless you!

fiercygoat

Yes, i do recognize that amount of XEC. It's the exact amount that i should have had from moving around 16.22 BCH from my blockchain.net private wallet to different exchanges and other private wallets hoping that one of them would deposit my XEC. I wonder if you can find the other amount of XEC from my other blockchain.net private wallet that had 16.57 BCH

Deminero30

It's definitely possible to recover. I'm looking at the transaction id now to try and trace the XEC. Out can take a look at my profile, I deal with things like these, just give me a couple of minutes.

schroobyDoowop

I get this from wikipedia &#x200B; The following is a list of notable hard forks splitting bitcoin by date and/or block: Bitcoin Cash: Forked at block 478558, 1 August 2017, for each bitcoin (BTC), an owner got 1 Bitcoin Cash (BCH) Bitcoin SV: Forked at block 556766, 15 November 2018, for each Bitcoin Cash (BCH), an owner got 1 Bitcoin SV (BSV). eCash: Forked at block 661648, 15 November 2020, for each Bitcoin Cash (BCH), an owner got 1,000,000 eCash (XEC). Bitcoin Gold: Forked at block 491407, 24 October 2017, for each bitcoin (BTC), an owner got 1 Bitcoin Gold (BTG)

ccMudButt

Do we buy eCash (XEC)?

Nox_Lucis

The name "eCash" is already taken, ticker XEC. It's a less-discussed hard fork of the Blocksize Wars, a sibling to BCH and BSV. 75^th position by market cap, currently.

KeepBitcoinFree_org

https://blockchain.poker is by far the best crypto poker site and allows you to use BCH, BTC, BSV or XEC. I’ve had zero issues with the site and there’s no KYC to deposit or withdraw.

crimeo

> I have asked you to look into XEC multiple times What a particular people did in one case =/= that being the logical thing to do. You need to explain how it is rational and strategic, not just that someone did XYZ. People do stupid shit every day. > There is a lot about hash wars that you do not understand. And if you think you do understand it better, then you'd be able to briefly summarize why this makes sense in a sentence or two.

powellquesne

Thanks for the additional response but I don't have the time keep slogging through that much writing. I skimmed it and the problem with your analysis looks like that it assumes the enemy always has perfect information which isn't realistic at all. I am not the only one who has pointed out this problem with proof-of-stake. I don't need to convince you: I have witnessed people will deep pockets trying to pwn minority proof-of-work chains and regardless of whether they succeeded or failed, they could never hold onto any majority they achieved. The deep pocketed attackers always ran out of time and money first, because the defenders were spending almost nothing to keep spawning new chains. Look into the history of XEC and please keep your next reply, if any, brief enough that I won't have to skim it.

eleriaplepg

I am more optimistic about XEC than LMAO

eleriaplepg

**KOL's price is now at its lowest point, I'm more bullish on XEC**

itchyfeat

XEC - Ecash, solid roadmap. Open devs, 5 year investment will make you some amazing gains.

phillipsjk

Bitcoin Cash (and forks like BSV and XEC) simply raised the blocksize. No need for convoluted extension blocks. Good to hear the the LTC devs are more serious about raising transaction capacity than the BTC devs though. I see lots of people/businesses accepting BTC/LTC in the wild (seemingly oblivious to upgraded bitcoin, BCH).

GreenStretch

I saw eCash on CMC and didn't know what it was. Amaury Cash is back from the dead at #61, only five places below Faketoshi. "Bitcoin Cash ABC (BCHA) has rebranded to eCash (XEC) and has redenominated to a 1:1000000 ratio. Who Are the Founders of eCash? ECash (XEC) is led by its lead developer Amaury Sechet, who was the lead developer of Bitcoin Cash (BCH) and forked that blockchain to establish the predecessor of eCash, Bitcoin Cash ABC (BCHA). That fork happened on November 15, 2020. Sechet then decided to rebrand Bitcoin Cash ABC to establish a new brand identity for eCash, explaining that a reduction of decimal places would help with the adoption of the coin:"

PhenacSpiral

I already buy more coins during this dip. Like BTC, ETH, ADA, BNB, XEC, and gonna buy TENO just waiting for their sale this month.

PhenacSpiral

I kept doing DCA in different coins no matter what happened. I always add on the dip these coins SAND, BNB, ETH, ADA, XEC, and planning to add TENO once it is listed already in exchange it has upcoming sales this month in launchpads.

i_have_chosen_a_name

I have sold 66% now and I am keeping 33% doing yield farming on smartBCH (still at 110% APR with 200K USD capital). If you diversify in to fiat (I am doing euro, cad and pound) and also go in to stablecoins that are backed and make sure you avoid and place that touches tether (9 out of 10 exchanges run on Tether so you have to be carefull) then you will survive the coming bear market very well. We are going to see massive flash crashes again, especially when the Tether fraud finally comes to it's end conclusion. The way to benefit from them is to have limit order in Kraken their trade engines, that's the only exchange that ALWAYS executes them. Next to that I am shorting some shitcoins and some promising coins that have been overbought. Shitcoins --> bsv and shib. BSV is becoming a scam coin because they are changing the code to allow CSW to steal BSV from whomever he wants. And shib is a play on dogecoin and because dogecoin exists, there is no reason for shib to exist. Then the overbought coins. First of all e-cash (XEC) It's fallen victim to a pump and dump and I have been making money on it going down since it went past 300. It's now back below 100 dollars per 1M xec. LRC is massively overbought, I have used the loopring orderbook based exchange and the AMM for almost a year. Many people don't know that loopring can't run dapps. A hype around LRC has been created but that hype is to early. That means dumb money has flown in to to and I am betting against that. It's the same idiots that never realized the GME shortsqueeze ended and that GME has already had it's ATH. So it's good to bet against them. Then solana, my most promising short. I started shorting it at 190 and then increased my short positions in between 200 and 250. 250 was scary for a while but then it became clear that we are doing a double peak on BTC like in 2017 and that 69K is the ATH for this cycle. Then the FED raised interest rates and all the institutional had to do risk management which means they have to liquidate some crypto assets and close some positions. So lots of stuff is going to go down now or sideways and we have to accept it when reality changes. Moon is going by by for a while. Unless you have learned how to play these markets, then you are already on the moon and every day is moon day. And now for the downvotes! Come on, let's downvote this assholes that is freely sharing with everybody his strategy on how to make EVEN more money.

kuroirider

Call me crazy, but I'm always buying XEC and SHIB

i_have_chosen_a_name

All of this is correct but needs to be done on a chain that can do 30x of Ethereum's capacity while being secured with proof of work (and staying with proof of work). I am on a chain that can process 1 billion gas every 15 seconds and is secured by the SHA256 hash that mines BTC,BCH,XEC and BSV. Ethereum's L1 just does not scale good enough by itself. Here is how it should scale --> https://docs.smartbch.org/smartbch/in-depth-design-documents/generalidea

i_have_chosen_a_name

SmartBCH is a sidechain build on top of Bitcoin Cash. It's security comes from the SHA256 miners that mine Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, XEC and BSV. For payment transactions, it can process about a 1080 times more per second then Ethereum. For smart contract transactions it can process about 1 billion gas every 15 seconds which is about 30 times as much as Ethereum does. That means that you can have a userbase 30 times the size of Ethereum because you have scale outside of the system.

dhork

Mine is XEC, but for a different reason. I didn't ask for it, it just appeared when the Bitcoin Cash ABC developers decided that it was a good idea to institute a Miner Tax on all transactions, and BCH split into BCHN and BCHABC. The miner tax was a horrible idea, of course, so BCHABC became irrelevant. To try and reinstitute its relevancy, BCHABC split a million-to-one and rebranded itself as ECash/XEC. Maybe someday someone will pump it and I can sell it off, but I didn't pay anything for it to begin with, so it's not like I'm sitting on a huge loss.

BCHcain

Check out eCash (XEC). The website is e.cash.

Revolutionary-Case36

XEC 🔥🔥

VentiVeggies

What is everyones opinion on XEC?

SuddenBus

Yes I like $XEC and $XMR. The guy behind ecash, Amaury Séchet, is co-founder of $BCH. I really like what he is doing. Using $AVAX for $XEC is also a great idea. This could become a really neat project in the future!

cthulhucomes

There is… *cough* … XEC eCash…?

BCHcain

eCash (XEC) because they have great developers, a solid roadmap and an overall vision. Find more info at e.cash.

SuddenBus

Good! $FTM, $XEC, $SHIB, $LUNA

sassyusage

Wasnt aware of XEC before now, how many times does a shitcoin need to be forked

Maxxjulie

What about XEC? A fork if a shit coin also a shitcoin? 😂

julian4u000

In my opinion: KDA, XEC, IOTX, ICP

i_have_chosen_a_name

Monero and BCH are the most overshorted coins on the market. Binance on a regular basis runs out of BCH for withdrawls. Same with monero. Monero is the only coin that offers almost perfect privacy. That's a utililty that will ALWAYS have a value. BCH launched a layer2 about 3 months ago that is basically Ethereum build on top of BCH where the validators get decided by the proof of work on BCH. Which means any SHA256 miner in the system (BTC, BCH,XEC) can vote for himself as validator and start making extra BCH on smartBCH by getting the fees. Now half of those fees get burned. Which means that the BCH supply is now 110 BCH lower then a couple of months ago. Anyway, there is already close to 110 000 BCH staked on smartBCH right now, it's the 9th biggest address on BCH. In about one month Kim Dotcom is also going to launch https://k.im which is a service that will allow anybody in the world to monetize anything they want and put it behind a crypto paywall. They will accept many crypto's but their baselayer will be on BCH and there will be smartBCH integration as well. Anyways, just like the ETH/BTC price is going up in favor of ETH there is a very good change the BCH/BTC price will go up in favor of BCH. So if all you care is getting more BTC, and you already exploited ETH to get more BTC now might be a good time to exploit BCH to do the same.