CCC

Aussiehash

Can you explain the difference between CCC and HSM mode ? Does CCC use or require CKBunker ?

rnvk

Video here of CCC https://youtu.be/6MoQpLrPYXY

HSuke

Totally thanks for sharing. I used to listen to CCC years ago despite that I barely have the time to sit through their hour-long episodes. (I wish they had summaries.) I'm also a Fed (waiting for RIF to kick in anytime), so I totally understand what you said halfway through. I get paid shit compared to how much I got paid working for private companies before. It's like community service, and most employees are honest, hardworking people. I listened to a whole episode. I'll probably share the following with the Ethereum community as a summary of the more interesting parts they might want to know. Please let me know if you see any mistakes. ---------------------------------- **A very-revealing interview with a former SEC senior advisor** Ever wonder why the SEC was so damn confusing in the previous administration? Crypto Critics' Corner released a very interesting episode titled "What happened to the SEC?" This episode is an interview with a former Senior Advisor for the SEC under Gary Gensler, Corey Frayer, who is representing himself and not the SEC. Corey is more open to provide insight to the SEC's confusing decision-making now that he's no longer part of their department. This clarifies a lot of misconceptions around their decisions. I'm summarizing what was said during the interview with my neutral commentary. Please take this with a grain of salt since there are some statements that I can't verify. **The SEC's role is to make sure all investment contracts are properly disclosed.** Ultimately, the SEC's role is all about disclosure. For example, the SEC won't go after a Ponzi scheme as long as it **registers as a Ponzi scheme with proper disclosure**. Now other Federal bureaus might go after the Ponzi scheme for running afoul of other laws, but that's not the SEC's role. The SEC's goal is to make sure investors have all the information they need through disclosures. **SEC reached out to CEXs, but CEXs did not play friendly** The SEC reached out to all the CEXs and tried to work with them. They wanted CEXs to register as securities exchanges and were willing to play friendly with them. According to Corey, CEXs most likely didn't want to register because it would have scared away most tokens from wanting to list on them. If a CEX registered, new tokens would go to a competing CEX that didn't require registering with the SEC. The SEC was open to making their decisions public, but the CEXs wanted confidentiality for their meetings. In fact, there were some CEXs that registered, and they were extremely unpopular because cryptocurrency teams avoided them. Corey says that it was totally possible for them to register as proper securities exchanges and keep operating. But it definitely would have scared away more sketchy tokens and made exchanges much smaller. **The SEC is inconsistent between administrations, but they are held accountable to previous administration's mistakes** The SEC is not a monolithic organization, and it changes between administrations. However, they are somewhat beholden to the decisions of previous administrations. Previous administrations suggested that decentralization was important in determining whether something was a security, but Gensler's administration did not feel that way. Gensler's definition was based on the Howey Test. The test was not only supposed to be applied to the digital asset itself, but to every interaction with the digital asset. Basically, is there an expectation of profit from the work of a common enterprise? The SEC is held accountable for things stated during previous administrations even if the current administration doesn't agree with them. The SEC found it difficult to say things that conflicted with previous statements from previous administrations, which explains their ambiguity and dodging questions in courts. Unless Congresses a new law changing things, their hands are tied and they're expected to be consistent. **Ripple was a SEC win** The SEC case established that the Ripple ICO was a securities contract. The other part about secondary sales of cryptocurrencies was partially misinterpreted. It would be pretty ridiculous to say that secondary sales of stocks are no longer securities after their company's IPO. Secondary sales can actually be retried under the Howey Test to determine whether they are securities. **FTX crisis** Corey points out that the fraud and accounting was at FTX International, and the SEC didn't have sufficient insight into international activities. By the time they knew about it, it was too late. **Limited resources to go after small-scale fraud** There are 15000+ cryptoassets and many more being launched annually. The SEC doesn't have enough resources to go after all the small cases by celebrities that make it to mainstream news. They are overwhelmed because it's so easy to launch crypto projects vs traditional stock companies. **CeFi companies like BlockFi** The SEC went after BlockFi first because it was an easy smaller target. Corey considers it a success since there was a lot of risky leverage in the CeFi market through lending products for retail investors. **Newer memecoins might be securities: Dogecoin vs Trump** Older memecoins like Dogecoin are almost certainly not securities because they were launched as a joke without expectation of profit. However, newer memecoins like **Trump** might be considered securities because they are created for profit and that there is an expectation of profit from being associated with Trump and his projects. **Elon Musk, and why didn't the SEC stop him?** CCC interviewers said Musk is dogeshit for trying to shut down the government and asked Corey why the SEC didn't pursue him harder for conflict-of-interest tweets. Elon Musk was breaking securities disclosure laws rules by constantly tweeting. The SEC fined him but didn't go after him repeatedly because they would have to open a new investigation every time he tweeted. They didn't have enough resources to go after the richest man in the world who also has a huge political influence. Also, Corey says personal letters to legislators are read by staff and useful.

facemrook

Not even the crypto critical community likes him. He picked fights with the CCC podcast, and has shittalked coffeezilla too. There's a reason most prominent crypto critics stay away from Buttcoin.

Immediate_Check_74

nah $CCC

Moist-Oven-7516

Interesting project, keep up $CCC

Collectsteve850

My advice for anyone investing in CCC, only invest an amount you're comfortable with losing.

dou8le8u88le

100,000 in Roman numerals in CCCICCC but the last CCC is backwards. So it mirrors its self. Pretty fucking cool tattoo!!

broken-neurons

I still think it was Hal or someone Hal knew. Read Satoshi’s [first email](https://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2009-January.txt) in the Cryptography Mailing List in 2009, about his first release of Bitcoin and then watch the subsequent replies. It takes Hal less than a day to reply to Satoshi. The detail in his responses suggests to me that he had already knowledge of what it exactly was and more importantly what of an impact bitcoin could make in the future. Whilst Finney already had a deep knowledge and experience in these topics (RPOW) the detail he goes into is telling. He also actively supports the project, encouraging others by standing forward and saying he installed it and had tried it. Getting a bunch of crypto people and security researchers to install some random windows binary from some unknown person isn’t an easy task. Either Finney was sock-puppeting his alt or he knew the alt. The gmx.com email address always puzzles me too. Satoshi used (on occasion) a gmx.com email address. It means the account wasn’t created whilst being in Germany, Austria or Switzerland, since those users [were always issued country specific TLDs](http://www.emaildiscussions.com/showthread.php?t=57794). Gmx.com launched in 2007 and the .com email addresses were issued to users outside German speaking countries based on their IP and redirection from gmx.de to gmx.com. Gmx was very popular in German speaking countries but not that well known outside of them. Advertising for this “email made in Germany” was everywhere at the time. It claimed to be very secure and backed by Deutsche Telekom (ironically). If you had visited the CCC (Chaos Communication Congress) convention in Hamburg in 2007 (24C3) for example, you would have been exposed to this marketing campaign. And who [presented at CCC that year](https://fahrplan.events.ccc.de/congress/2007/Fahrplan/speakers.en.html)? Both Len Sassamann and [Dan Kaminsky](https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/daniel-kaminsky-internet-security-savior-dies-at-42/). Dan Kaminsky is now dead (also died young like Finney and Sassamann), but he was the one that [vehemently](https://dankaminsky.com/2016/05/03/the-cryptographically-provable-con-man/) set out to prove that Craig Wright was [bullshit](https://dankaminsky.com/2016/05/02/validating-satoshi-or-not/) central. Ironically the theme of [24C3](https://flickr.com/search/?text=24c3) was “Überwachung” (surveillance). Hal maybe didn’t know who Satoshi was, but I still think he knew Satoshi virtually before that first email.

Adventurous_Ice_8587

Those days were different no exchanges no online wallet you had to write the code for your transactions and for your encryption. So it was definitely not luck of the drawing. You know lots of people will say oh you were just lucky. No, I was actually writing code for decades, and I was working my butt off to learn it and to build webpages because I saw how the world was changed by computers, so when the Internet dropped, I was like oh my gosh you know we we’ve hooked computer together before making the super computers but this is beyond that so I was in the.com. We did great and it was lots of fun and everybody that was involved the same ration. I’m not kidding you if it wasn’t good for everybody involved, I didn’t want anything to do with it. Limited a lot of the contracts I received, and I had to freelance for a decade. That was hard as well. I lost probably 20 or 2500 bitcoin, when they were a buck or so by trying a shareware wallet idea. It was my fault. I didn’t erase some of the programs and software I needed to prior to installing. So there were a couple problems when it installed and I had imported a new address for every transaction….. whoops. I read today the gentleman trying to dig up. The landfill has been turned down by the city again. Another situation where a city could be blessed with a lot of money just by letting the guy dig through their garbage and then put it back. They think he’s gonna collect a bunch of names and do it four CCC. Like the tweakers back in 1999 and 2000. The first cell phone companies were some of the dirtiest stores as far as ripping the customers off as well. Anyways, I guess my long point you’ll have to excuse me I have autism. It’s a verbal autism so I over explain and something you say in a sentence it takes a paragraph so bear with me and thank you. You don’t need to read this never bothers me if anybody reads it. Just saying there’s bitcoin because of the network and technology backing it. That’s where it’s going to change things and increase the price of a coin. I’ve been pigeonhole since 2012 2013 for throwing my money away although I’ve got a debit card just like my bank debit card that I can go to any ATM and pull money out even if it’s a non-bitcoin. I’ve been very lucky to buy high and sell low after selling over 100 for $200-&400. 2 of my family elders had metastatic cancer. Each one went to the specialized hospital for their own treatment plan. Worth every penny of it. Humans can’t be replaced bitcoin and money that’s a simple equation.

CoolCatforCrypto

Your take on innovation and how it relates to btc is completely wrong. I am accepting your dissenting view and explaining why it is very far off. The innovation in btc is not your normal innovation like windows, the web browser, the iphone and the keurig k cup coffee machine were. The innovation of blockchain is not in tech it is in its DESIGN PHILOSOPHY: HOW EXISTING TECH IS ASSEMBLED IN A UNIQUE WAY TO DELIVER VALUE. All caps is not designed to scream at you but to point out a fundamental fact about bitcoin as a crypto and the blockchain it runs on. When you drill down you will find most of the tech that btc is built on is not all that innovative - it is off the shelf tech, again, ASSEMBLED AND DESIGNED IN A UNIQUE WAY that delivers bitcoin/blockchain uniqueness: To wit: Database sharding - 10 years old Key pair encryption - 50 years old Interplanetary File System - 10 years old State machine replication - 50 years old There's a bunch of other stuff you could list but these are the key pieces of tech. There's not much else out there that is more "elegant" than bitcoin blockchain. I don't understand what you are getting at at all here. Nothing better - more innovative - is going to replace bitcoin blockchain. And if you seek serious discussion on bitcoin you must understand bitcoin as a blockchain first. No blockchain, no bitcoin. BTC owes its existence to blockchain, not the other way around. About me: I have a small IT consulting shop, incl blockchain. I have completed two courses of study. on blockchain. One at the Blockchain Council and one at the Wharton School Univ of Penn \[exec education\]. Cheers, CCC

throwawayaaam

Thanks for the feedback. What do you think happened? I sent tiny amounts as test checks (green) and then in the second test check, it “broke” the change into two (CCC and DDD). I wasnt familiar with UTXO then so when I saw in my cold wallet the DDD transaction, I thought I was compromised and sent out the CCC transaction to the exchange.

Ajax_ZQN

Pure BTC for now, but toying with throwing $1k at a meme coin just for fun. Maybe even Coconut Chicken ($CCC).

kcryptohodlr

1.132,325 2.0x4CCC1256D893D61C40B08393C685c0A5AC155f3e

Breadstronaut

1. 694,269 2. 0xA431D01354807Dc9a4fc92CCC0Ce5169712d0031

efgraphics

My Dad… 79. Was a banker for over 30 years. Then worked for the government CCC for another 30. He still doesn’t get it. He reads about it, but he just downer want to buy. Eh, he says, I’ll stick with the stock market.

Royal_Marketing529

I thought about this more and I didn‘t realize that at first: The question of „is the signature using my passphrase?“ is very easily verfiable. Meaning, if it weren‘t using the passphrase in general, people would know. If it were only my device that isn‘t using the passphrase then my device would‘ve been tampered with which I find far fetched but I guess possible. If I buy a coldcard device now and enter my seed and passphrase in there, it should theoretically come out to be the same keys. That way I could verify if my ledger is using the correct keys for signatures. I‘d first need to check if the BIP39 implementations are the same though. I‘m not worried about the keys leaking. Especially because I only use temporary passphrases too. CCC didn‘t manage to break the Ledger either iirc.

igadjeed

CCC, Crypto Crime City

incubus4282

El Salvador is likely going to default on their existing debt in 2023. Their government budget is unsustainable, their credit rating is at a terrible CCC and investors already demand a yield of [>20%](https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/bonds/china-el-salvador-debt-default-refinance-bitcoin-bond-nayib-bukele-2022-11). The only ones buying this bonds are people whose due diligence process stops after reading the words "volcano bonds".

Ferdo306

*SEC alleges that each of the defendants made materially false and misleading statements in the offer, purchase, and/or sale of BXY tokens, including about the custody and delivery of BXY, the markup charged by CCC, the delivery of account statements, CCC's liquidation of an investor's BXY, their personal investments in BXY, and the financial and management problems occurring at BXY's issuer, Beaxy Digital Ltd., in late 2019. As a result of this alleged fraud, the SEC alleges that some of these investors never received their BXY tokens, and all those who invested paid an undisclosed markup on their BXY tokens* So OPs 'friends and family' are 100 individuals who weren't informed about custody, delivery, mark up, OPs personal investment in the token and problems issuer was expiriencing. Plus some didn't even receive the token

KateR_H0l1day

Where can I buy theses CCC, sounds just like a coin I need to add, love cheese but admit I don’t like soft cheeses.

LivingFondant1419

Title error: they got demoted to CCC, not CC

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; El Salvador is 57% down on its bitcoin bet. Fitch Ratings downgraded the country's external debt to CC from CCC, blaming bitcoin for risk of default. President Nayib Bukele wanted to build Bitcoin City, a tax-free haven running entirely on bitcoin. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.*

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; El Salvador's President Nayib Bukele has announced that he will run for a second consecutive term in the 2024 presidential elections. The country's constitution prohibits Presidents from having consecutive terms, but the Supreme Court ruled in 2021 that he could run for the position. The decision comes despite El Salvador's credit rating agency Fitch downgrading the nation's Long-Term Foreign Currency Issuer Default Rating to “CC” from “CCC” *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.*

coinfeeds-bot

tldr; The Securities and Exchange Commission has filed a lawsuit against Chicago Crypto Capital for allegedly defrauding investors of $1.5 million by issuing unregistered BXY tokens during the 2018 ICO boom. The lawsuit also named CCC’s owner, Brian Amoah, and two salesmen, Oliver Young and Elbert Elliot, as unregistered broker-dealers. Some investors claimed they never received the tokens. *This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.*

Demonyx12

The Cramer Crustacean Conundrum (CCC)

Taykeshi

Climate Crime Coin, CCC

Deadlock1920

Meanwhile my guy Saylor: Imagine yourself sitting on a melting ice cube of 500.000.000 USD with the highest inflation rate since X, and losing its value according to CCP, CCI and CCC; so think about Manhattan and owning a land there in 1930 and think of it for a second of the digital hyper space suit symphony of the store energy transformation, what is transformation right? Imagine yourself trying to send 150 kg gold from Zambia to New Zealand on a sunny saturday afternoon? Uhmmm, good luck with that. Bitcoin is a digital property of the future, if you own anything in North Korea. Right? Whole point of money is being energy. Transfering this value from cyberspace and daft punk, is conservative! Right?

smellyboi6969

El Salvador has lost $60 Million so far on their Bitcoin purchases. That's $60 Million that could have been used for social welfare, schools, or pay off debt. Its debt was recently downgraded to CCC+ by S&P putting it's debt in the same rating category as Ukraine. Every $$ El Salvador borrows is now more expensive and there are serious doubts about it's ability to repay its debts in the future.

princepersona1

CCC. Confidence, certainty and conviction

polloponzi

The original twitter thread is here [https://twitter.com/FatManTerra/status/1531365988809293825](https://twitter.com/FatManTerra/status/1531365988809293825) Below follows a summary of the twitter thread >Mirror Protocol is being exploited again as we speak, and the devs are completely MIA. So far, the attacker has drained over $2m and counting - the attack will get worse when markets open tomorrow unless the dev team steps in and fixes the price oracle. > >A bug in the pricing oracle is telling the system that LUNC is worth around 5 UST when it's actually under a microcent. For $1k in LUNC, an attacker can now load up on $1.3m in collateral but can pull out real assets by borrowing. Example tx: [https://finder.terra.money/classic/tx/F830681D8FEACC4DA67E84D40C49F0FF805609F2BB5CCC39A0EFE66257F2D791](https://finder.terra.money/classic/tx/F830681D8FEACC4DA67E84D40C49F0FF805609F2BB5CCC39A0EFE66257F2D791) > >So far, the mBTC, mETH, mDOT and mGLXY pools have been drained. In around 12 hours, the market feed will kick in, and the attacker will be able to drain all of the mAsset pools (such as mSPY and mAAPL, mAMZN, etc.) - most of the pools can still be saved. > >In a short while, all liquidity pools will be drained, Mirror will accrue irremediable bad debt, and the system will collapse in on itself. This is not the time to be negligent. Other tweets on the thread: >Q: It looks like the Terra Classic validators are reporting the price of $LUNA rather than $LUNC correct? > >A: [@stablekwon](https://twitter.com/stablekwon) rolled out an API-breaking update in a hurry, with no regard for second-order consequences, no coordination among exchanges or even other Terra protocols, on the eve of a holiday weekend. Who does that?

polloponzi

The original twitter thread is here [https://twitter.com/FatManTerra/status/1531365988809293825](https://twitter.com/FatManTerra/status/1531365988809293825) Below follows a summary of the twitter thread >Mirror Protocol is being exploited again as we speak, and the devs are completely MIA. So far, the attacker has drained over $2m and counting - the attack will get worse when markets open tomorrow unless the dev team steps in and fixes the price oracle. > >A bug in the pricing oracle is telling the system that LUNC is worth around 5 UST when it's actually under a microcent. For $1k in LUNC, an attacker can now load up on $1.3m in collateral but can pull out real assets by borrowing. Example tx: [https://finder.terra.money/classic/tx/F830681D8FEACC4DA67E84D40C49F0FF805609F2BB5CCC39A0EFE66257F2D791](https://finder.terra.money/classic/tx/F830681D8FEACC4DA67E84D40C49F0FF805609F2BB5CCC39A0EFE66257F2D791) > >So far, the mBTC, mETH, mDOT and mGLXY pools have been drained. In around 12 hours, the market feed will kick in, and the attacker will be able to drain all of the mAsset pools (such as mSPY and mAAPL, mAMZN, etc.) - most of the pools can still be saved. > >In a short while, all liquidity pools will be drained, Mirror will accrue irremediable bad debt, and the system will collapse in on itself. This is not the time to be negligent. Other tweets on the thread: >Q: It looks like the Terra Classic validators are reporting the price of $LUNA rather than $LUNC correct? > >A: [@stablekwon](https://twitter.com/stablekwon) rolled out an API-breaking update in a hurry, with no regard for second-order consequences, no coordination among exchanges or even other Terra protocols, on the eve of a holiday weekend. Who does that?

eriskendaj

As I said, there will always be people predicting all kinds of stuff. I'm sure CCC has made wrong claims before this one. If you're telling me that there are people who are right 100% of the time only because they do their research, I'm sorry to burst your bubble but it doesn't work that way. One thing we all agree on, is that we can't predict the market, and in this game for CCC to win and be right, others must be wrong and lose. There's no point in telling now that he was right and people should listen to him, because he can't be right without people being wrong first. I don't know if I'm explaining myself correctly, my main point is that this shit is always going to happen. There's no reality where everybody is going to make it. And telling people that you should listen to this or do that in order to win, is ironic at best. Last example, if CCC made money by shorting Luna, if everybody listened to him and everybody shorted, there's no money from longs to be made so everybody would lose and he wouldn't be right right now.

spicolispizza

FYI https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/a-new-moneygram-deal-is-a-big-deal-for-xlm-and-the-stellar-network-2021-10-20 >The Moneygram Deal On Oct. 6, Stellar Lumens achieved a major milestone. It signed a major international remittance company, MoneyGram International (NASDAQ:MGI) as a client. The Stellar Foundation signed an agreement that will allow it to develop a payments bridge that streamlines money transfers. >The platform will enable near-instant settlement in USD Coin (CCC:USDC-USD). USDC is a stablecoin pegged to the U.S. dollar developed by Circle, ranked the 10th largest crypto with a $32.2 billion market capitalization.

uninslalm

I may have heard of how buy tax works before. I think it's a good way of earning with CCC

sarahisforyou

I would bet on these ones: Ripple (CCC:XRP-USD) XDC (CCC:XDC-USD) Stellar Lumens (CCC:XLM-USD) Iota (CCC:IOTA-USD) Algorand (CCC:ALGO-USD)

vresovkamfh

This is one working strategy in the crypto space and has helped lots of people so far, it is really a good thing that prices of alts are discounted following the bloodbath and I filled my bags with more CCC; interestingly it also has streams of earning from reflections and its investment-dao which cuts across major areas of crypto (DEFI,NFT and GAMING).

wokuhlalatw

I think 'Take profit' should be the right phase, still, no one is taking my bags away from me not when I just bought CCC and more MATIC.

wokuhlalatw

I am still buying the dip and not giving up on crypto just yet. Cross chain capital(CCC) is an investment DAO with a unique passive income stream from buy/sell tax levied on token transaction distributed amongst existing token holders.

Mamnorgathgamkm

Its been pretty critical these past days. Hopefully my accumulations before now will hodl till the bulls comes, bet my new lowcaps FTM,LRC and CCC will glow.

smrznutihjh

That's pretty good I think, maybe I will take a look at it, for now, I have many ways of earning through CCC, do you know I earn from buy tax? like for every buy, 10% taxed tokens is applied, which is shared among holders, a good way of earning profit

smrznutihjh

Yes exactly, CCC is even running a DAO and is fully focused on generating high yield for its members through making significant investments across defi (Tokemak) and p2e( Crabada) and also looking forward to expanding more. How does LOX do that? through incentives?

throwawayLouisa

That is indeed because of their risk of default as assessed by the global bond market traders. Rating agencies have also downgraded: * Standard & Poor: B- with negative outlook * Moody's: Caa3 with negative outlook * Fitch's: CCC with no outlook. Sovereign wealth funds, pension funds and other investors gauge the credit worthiness of El Salvador from these ratings, and that has a big impact on the country's borrowing costs.

vresovkamfh

I advise folks as much as I can to buy when the dips are still very much around, stake or look into any profit yielding platform, I have invested lots of my DCAing into projects I am convinced about; BTC and ETH definitely top the list in my portfolio and CCC which I jumped on not quite long functions as a community-driven which give steady and passive earning off the dao and the buy/sell tax distribution.

uninslalm

Looks like the CCC team really holds their community of hodlers as well as the coin itself in high esteem. I'm aware LOX has opted for the giveaway route to keep their community of hodlers engaged and excited.

Etagedh

When holding a solid project like MATIC you really do not have to worry as the project continues to grow which directly affects the price of the asset, another good one is CCC which delibrately pays passively for holding from streams like the buy/sell tax and its investment dao.

moretaszz

Most alt is at a very discount price at the moment, I copped more SYLO and ENJ, also adding CCC, its very underpriced at the moment and I see lots of potential especially for long term goal

smrznutihjh

Lending is good, so as staking, even farming, I do all these for passive income, I also prefer earning for just holding tokens like CCC, which reward holders through buy taxes, like 10% taxed token from each buy are shared to existing holders as passive income, What do you think?

smrznutihjh

That's true, the low cap usually has a lot of potentials, I haven't heard of holoride, Is this a gaming project?. Well talking about CCC, I have been holding since and I earn passively through 10% tax on buyers which are equally shared to existing holders. Just look it up to since you find it interesting

bgrated

CCC cotton candy coin

geredetli

And you're probably aware that some low-cap crypto have a faster return on investment, and less expensive. In the meantime, I also did notice that holoride is moving in-vehicle entertainment to the next level, with its XR tech for back seat passengers, while UTK ensures easy payment of global ecommerce, all solving global needs. But, CCC potentials intrigue me, and I believe I'll need to conduct more research on it.

smrznutihjh

you are right, BTC and ETH are safe bets, I have also heard of RIDE of holoride. Other low caps that also worth looking at are CCC, SYLO, and FLUX. SYLO is web 3 gem while CCC is the utility token powering the whole Cross-chain Capital DAO and being a deflationary token makes it make much sense since its value increases over time

smrznutihjh

It's good you shared your own opinion, BTC and ETH are good ones, I hold them as well, I also have other alts in my bag like CCC and UDO. I fancy the fact that CCC implements token buybacks whereby the tokens are bought back using the profit received from their treasury investments and distribute yield back to holders and this has a way to regulate the total supply, increasing the value and pricee

quintalunazf

A Cross-chain capital holder was spotted, it is no longer news that CCC is another based project to look out for, what really caught my fancy is the fact that the community actually has a say in the process of the DAO and the yields are paid accurately; it is one f the very few that actually exhibits the full feature of a DAO.

fyriskipivp

ETH BCH some CCC Probably AXL and DOT too If I could , I would buy so many more gems

GuyWithNoEffingClue

It's always a great pride and privilege to do my CCC* duty. ^(Crypto Currency Citizen)

Theweebsgod

Bitcoin Ethereum (CCC:ETH-USD) Cardano (CCC:ADA-USD) Stellar Lumens (CCC:XLM-USD) Monero (CCC: XMR-USD) Binance Coin (CCC:BNB-USD) Litecoin (CCC:LTC-USD) According to the article.

Cpt_Stonehead

It will be interesting to see what happens to it. You should mint enough to be able to have millions of holders, just in case 🤪 Names: CAPE - Crypto Ape CCC - Crypto Currency Coin AERO - DUMP - PUMP - PAMP - ACAB - PUNK - FUNKY - JUMP - EATIT - GEM - BEAT.

milonuttigrain

Might as well downgrade to CCC- or junk

Goonzoo

You should bring out a CEX Compare coin $CCC

Etagedh

The new era is not really limited to to SYS alone but to the likes of CCC which is running a DAO that cut across the core areas of crypto and also runs a GameFi/DeFi yield aggregation service alongside.

Etagedh

In as much as i am a big fan of defi kingdom, at this point in time I will chose the HUNT protocol serviced by cross-chain capital,CCC operates the pool and distributes yield to HUNT NFT holders in the form of TUS.

quintalunazf

Investing in good coins is safe but what justifies a good one? I only trust in my own research and I have BTC stacked in a cold wallet looking around for some good alts opened my eyes to many but I spotted FLUX, CCC, and CROTAMA.

Etagedh

ICP was one of those alts I bought without research hoping it would rally back to its ATH, but it's all good now I don't invest without extensive research these days and the results have been quite impressive; one of the results is CCC which is a very solid project with the good use case and gives me passive income.

Etagedh

Binance is one of the best exchanges out there meanwhile you cannot rule out some of these major dex 'cos that where tokens like CCC is listed, it is listed on TraderJoe FYI.

klizmimale

I find CCC also very attractive. Do you know that, staking through StakeEasy platform let's you have a staking derivative token which can be used in other DeFi protocols and can also be easily transferred or swapped with some other asset? Is this also same with CCC?

hepateeu

I see a lot of projects are revolutionizing how passive income are to be earned and staking done. I'll definitely check out StakeEasy because CCC's unique passive income stream was my main attraction to the project.

Etagedh

I'm really not surprised to see AVAX o this list, it has successfully gained that spot and it caught my fancy genuinely by onboarding new-based projects like CCC and some other alts in the ecosystem.

Etagedh

It is no new that the altcoin rally is dependent on previous or ongoing BTC rally which isn't really bad, I just want to see some alts grow well as expected,DOT and SOL were some of my most performed alts last year, would really love to see CCC and some others making good numbers as time goes by.

smrznutihjh

I'd suggest you hodl for longer-term, instead of selling now since you actually believe in the project. for instance, I bought CCC so cheap during the recent dip, went up by 9.9% but I'm still holding because I believe with the fundamentals of the project, I will gradually see a higher profit. my advice is just don't sell

2enjwq

Good choice, tho there are other solid DAOs out there too but the CCC uniqueness is obviously seen by all.

Etagedh

The market looks great for those of us that copped when the market dipped, a good thing I bought enough CCC tokens and have been earning passively as a member of its DAO and token holder.

quintalunazf

Well, I really do not have to worry about staking here and there, I have my funds in CCC which runs a DAO that has been able to live up to the real meaning of DAO and distribute earnings amongst its members at intervals.

hepateeu

CCC is a governance token driving the cross chain capital ecosystem and being a CCC holder comes with lots of benefits with my favorite being the 10% buy/sell tax charged on token transactions for new comers and distributed amongst the existing members.

Etagedh

In this new age, I feel everyone should be able to spend their money the way they want to, no one should come close to telling me why I spend one way or the other or buy a certain coin or token; I could decide to buy CCC for passive earning or whatsoever.

2enjwq

Earning passively without having to stake has to be my highlight holding the CCC token and of course being relieved of researching of projects to invest my funds in is also a good one.

Idgaf115599

0x031843132c55d5d5CCC65DE9f0cD82A286180e51

2enjwq

That how we roll, the dip is to top up the bags for the green days to come. This particular dip was a good one for, I stumbled on quite a number of gems like cross-chain capital (CCC) a friggin DAO with amazing benefits.

Etagedh

Truly MATIC had a very good run and I can say it hasn't reached its full potential, also looking into CCC for a major run as well, it runs a DAO and give passive earning to token holders.

klizmimale

Yes, you can do it. You can also dyor on the project's new privacy-preserving liquid staking solutions called StakeEasy. What is CCC, by the way?

hepateeu

That's a very healthy portfolio and I'll gladly put all that 15% on cross chain capital (CCC) just for the passive income earned on token transaction and the fact that I don't need to really bother myself on extensive research on where to invest my funds because cross chain capital is a decentralized investment funding platform operated in a DAO system pattern.

Etagedh

I think its just a kind of marketing style, ADA is shit,I recently looked into some solid projects and I was willing to buy into, the CCC tokens are still relatively cheap and it will give double reward to its token holders.

sahid584257

$GWS ✅DEV DOXX ✅CORP W/LLC & EIN ✅BUSINESS ACC ✅NO BUY TAX/SELL 10% ✅ANTI BOT LAUNCH ✅FULLY OPERATIONAL AT LAUNCH https://t.me/GWSFINANCE #GWSDAO #GWS #ETH #Crypto #olympusdao #MCC #REFI #TIME #BTRFLY #HEC #Hector #CCC #JadeProtocol #OHMForks #DAO #DAOLaunch #FAAS #DeFi

sahid584257

$GWS ✅DEV DOXX ✅CORP W/LLC & EIN ✅BUSINESS ACC ✅NO BUY TAX/SELL 10% ✅ANTI BOT LAUNCH ✅FULLY OPERATIONAL AT LAUNCH https://t.me/GWSFINANCE #GWSDAO #GWS #ETH #Crypto #olympusdao #MCC #REFI #TIME #BTRFLY #HEC #Hector #CCC #JadeProtocol #OHMForks #DAO #DAOLaunch #FAAS #DeFi

quintalunazf

DAOs are gaining tractions lately no doubt and looking into Cross-chain I noticed it has already placed investment into Tokemak and Crabada and holders of CCC tokens will earn passively.

wowiwwhh11

$GWS ✅DEV DOXX ✅CORP W/LLC & EIN ✅BUSINESS ACC ✅NO BUY TAX/SELL 10% ✅ANTI BOT LAUNCH ✅FULLY OPERATIONAL AT LAUNCH https://t.me/GWSFINANCE #GWSDAO #GWS #ETH #Crypto #olympusdao #MCC #REFI #TIME #BTRFLY #HEC #Hector #CCC #JadeProtocol #OHMForks #DAO #DAOLaunch #FAAS #DeFi

wowiwwhh11

$GWS ✅DEV DOXX ✅CORP W/LLC & EIN ✅BUSINESS ACC ✅NO BUY TAX/SELL 10% ✅ANTI BOT LAUNCH ✅FULLY OPERATIONAL AT LAUNCH https://t.me/GWSFINANCE #GWSDAO #GWS #ETH #Crypto #olympusdao #MCC #REFI #TIME #BTRFLY #HEC #Hector #CCC #JadeProtocol #OHMForks #DAO #DAOLaunch #FAAS #DeFi

wowiwwhh11

$GWS ✅DEV DOXX ✅CORP W/LLC & EIN ✅BUSINESS ACC ✅NO BUY TAX/SELL 10% ✅ANTI BOT LAUNCH ✅FULLY OPERATIONAL AT LAUNCH https://t.me/GWSFINANCE #GWSDAO #GWS #ETH #Crypto #olympusdao #MCC #REFI #TIME #BTRFLY #HEC #Hector #CCC #JadeProtocol #OHMForks #DAO #DAOLaunch #FAAS #DeFi

wowiwwhh11

$GWS ✅DEV DOXX ✅CORP W/LLC & EIN ✅BUSINESS ACC ✅NO BUY TAX/SELL 10% ✅ANTI BOT LAUNCH ✅FULLY OPERATIONAL AT LAUNCH https://t.me/GWSFINANCE #GWSDAO #GWS #ETH #Crypto #olympusdao #MCC #REFI #TIME #BTRFLY #HEC #Hector #CCC #JadeProtocol #OHMForks #DAO #DAOLaunch #FAAS #DeFi

hepateeu

Well I think cross-chain capital (CCC) is good since its a DAO that invest in vast industries including real estate, crypto with strong backing and partnerships.

hepateeu

I'll give it a trial with an open mind while I keep accumulating CCC. It's never too much accumulating solid projects.

hvfhjngf

$GWS ✅DEV DOXX ✅CORP W/LLC & EIN ✅BUSINESS ACC ✅NO BUY TAX/SELL 10% ✅ANTI BOT LAUNCH ✅FULLY OPERATIONAL AT LAUNCH https://t.me/GWSFINANCE #GWSDAO #GWS #ETH #Crypto #olympusdao #MCC #REFI #TIME #BTRFLY #HEC #Hector #CCC #JadeProtocol #OHMForks #DAO #DAOLaunch #FAAS #DeFi

quintalunazf

I have my ETH staked on Binance with a reasonable APY while I also earn passively for holding CCC tokens from its functional running DAO system.

brotherhood1000000

$GWS ✅DEV DOXX ✅CORP W/LLC & EIN ✅BUSINESS ACC ✅NO BUY TAX/SELL 10% ✅ANTI BOT LAUNCH ✅FULLY OPERATIONAL AT LAUNCH https://t.me/GWSFINANCE #GWSDAO #GWS #ETH #Crypto #olympusdao #MCC #REFI #TIME #BTRFLY #HEC #Hector #CCC #JadeProtocol #OHMForks #DAO #DAOLaunch #FAAS #DeFi

brotherhood1000000

$GWS ✅DEV DOXX ✅CORP W/LLC & EIN ✅BUSINESS ACC ✅NO BUY TAX/SELL 10% ✅ANTI BOT LAUNCH ✅FULLY OPERATIONAL AT LAUNCH https://t.me/GWSFINANCE #GWSDAO #GWS #ETH #Crypto #olympusdao #MCC #REFI #TIME #BTRFLY #HEC #Hector #CCC #JadeProtocol #OHMForks #DAO #DAOLaunch #FAAS #DeFi

brotherhood1000000

$GWS ✅DEV DOXX ✅CORP W/LLC & EIN ✅BUSINESS ACC ✅NO BUY TAX/SELL 10% ✅ANTI BOT LAUNCH ✅FULLY OPERATIONAL AT LAUNCH https://t.me/GWSFINANCE #GWSDAO #GWS #ETH #Crypto #olympusdao #MCC #REFI #TIME #BTRFLY #HEC #Hector #CCC #JadeProtocol #OHMForks #DAO #DAOLaunch #FAAS #DeFi

brotherhood1000000

$GWS ✅DEV DOXX ✅CORP W/LLC & EIN ✅BUSINESS ACC ✅NO BUY TAX/SELL 10% ✅ANTI BOT LAUNCH ✅FULLY OPERATIONAL AT LAUNCH https://t.me/GWSFINANCE #GWSDAO #GWS #ETH #Crypto #olympusdao #MCC #REFI #TIME #BTRFLY #HEC #Hector #CCC #JadeProtocol #OHMForks #DAO #DAOLaunch #FAAS #DeFi

brotherhood1000000

$GWS ✅DEV DOXX ✅CORP W/LLC & EIN ✅BUSINESS ACC ✅NO BUY TAX/SELL 10% ✅ANTI BOT LAUNCH ✅FULLY OPERATIONAL AT LAUNCH https://t.me/GWSFINANCE #GWSDAO #GWS #ETH #Crypto #olympusdao #MCC #REFI #TIME #BTRFLY #HEC #Hector #CCC #JadeProtocol #OHMForks #DAO #DAOLaunch #FAAS #DeFi

jgbbsnsksb

$GWS ✅DEV DOXX ✅CORP W/LLC & EIN ✅BUSINESS ACC ✅NO BUY TAX/SELL 10% ✅ANTI BOT LAUNCH ✅FULLY OPERATIONAL AT LAUNCH https://t.me/GWSFINANCE #GWSDAO #GWS #ETH #Crypto #olympusdao #MCC #REFI #TIME #BTRFLY #HEC #Hector #CCC #JadeProtocol #OHMForks #DAO #DAOLaunch #FAAS #DeFi

Bookspirit6

$GWS ✅DEV DOXX ✅CORP W/LLC & EIN ✅BUSINESS ACC ✅NO BUY TAX/SELL 10% ✅ANTI BOT LAUNCH ✅FULLY OPERATIONAL AT LAUNCH https://t.me/GWSFINANCE #GWSDAO #GWS #ETH #Crypto #olympusdao #MCC #REFI #TIME #BTRFLY #HEC #Hector #CCC #JadeProtocol #OHMForks #DAO #DAOLaunch #FAAS #DeFi